Finite element analysis and a pilot study of different fixation constructs for Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus fractures

Displaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and clinically efficacy of locking plates and lag screws, particularly in Weber A and B distal fibular fractures remains a subject of contention. This study examines two l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 981 - 13
Main Authors Huang, Shuming, Zhu, Junkun, Xing, Hailin, Yang, Ruifeng, Ye, Jifei, Ye, Fang, Wu, Quanzhou, Lan, Shuhua
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 19.12.2023
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Displaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and clinically efficacy of locking plates and lag screws, particularly in Weber A and B distal fibular fractures remains a subject of contention. This study examines two locking plate designs for lateral malleolus fractures, evaluating their performance with and without interfragmentary screws using finite element models. Utilising CT images of a healthy adult male volunteer, a three-dimensional finite element model was constructed. The Fibula-specific Flank Multiaxial Locking Anatomic Plate (FMLP) and the Conventional Locking Plate (CLP) were subjected to stabilisation, both with and without an interfragmentary screw, mimicking the Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus oblique fracture fixation. Loads of 140 N and 70 N, equivalent to 20% of the body weight, were applied to simulate the single-leg and two-leg standing conditions in the axial direction. The von Mises stress (VMS) distributions and element displacements were subsequently analyzed. In the Danis-Weber A fracture model group, the FMLP with an interfragmentary screw fixation exhibited the lowest peak VMS values: 51.9 MPa in the fibula, 89.0 MPa in the plate, and 61.3 MPa in the screws for simulating single-leg conditions. Under two-leg standing conditions, these peak VMS values decreased to 25.9 MPa in the fibula, 44.5 MPa in the plate, and 30.6 MPa in the screws, respectively. Furthermore, the overall structural peak displacements during single-leg standing for both Weber-A and B fractures with different implants ranged from 1.61 to 2.54 mm. While standing on two feet, the ranged was from 0.80 to 1.27 mm. An interfragmentary screw at the oblique fracture site resulted in reduced the peak value of VMS in the fibula, plate, screws, consequently decreased the overall structural displacement for FMLP and CLP fixation in lateral malleolus fractures. The current finite element analysis (FEA) demonstrates that FMLP exhibits superior mechanical characteristics in Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus fractures compared to CLP. The inclusion of an interfragmentary screw, combined with locking plate design, enhances stability for simple oblique distal fibular fractures. The FMLP presents itself as potential as an alternative for lateral malleolus fractures from a biomechanical perspective. Nevertheless, further verification of these results is imperative through subsequent clinical studies.
AbstractList Abstract Background Displaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and clinically efficacy of locking plates and lag screws, particularly in Weber A and B distal fibular fractures remains a subject of contention. This study examines two locking plate designs for lateral malleolus fractures, evaluating their performance with and without interfragmentary screws using finite element models. Methods Utilising CT images of a healthy adult male volunteer, a three-dimensional finite element model was constructed. The Fibula-specific Flank Multiaxial Locking Anatomic Plate (FMLP) and the Conventional Locking Plate (CLP) were subjected to stabilisation, both with and without an interfragmentary screw, mimicking the Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus oblique fracture fixation. Loads of 140 N and 70 N, equivalent to 20% of the body weight, were applied to simulate the single-leg and two-leg standing conditions in the axial direction. The von Mises stress (VMS) distributions and element displacements were subsequently analyzed. Results In the Danis-Weber A fracture model group, the FMLP with an interfragmentary screw fixation exhibited the lowest peak VMS values: 51.9 MPa in the fibula, 89.0 MPa in the plate, and 61.3 MPa in the screws for simulating single-leg conditions. Under two-leg standing conditions, these peak VMS values decreased to 25.9 MPa in the fibula, 44.5 MPa in the plate, and 30.6 MPa in the screws, respectively. Furthermore, the overall structural peak displacements during single-leg standing for both Weber-A and B fractures with different implants ranged from 1.61 to 2.54 mm. While standing on two feet, the ranged was from 0.80 to 1.27 mm. An interfragmentary screw at the oblique fracture site resulted in reduced the peak value of VMS in the fibula, plate, screws, consequently decreased the overall structural displacement for FMLP and CLP fixation in lateral malleolus fractures. Conclusions The current finite element analysis (FEA) demonstrates that FMLP exhibits superior mechanical characteristics in Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus fractures compared to CLP. The inclusion of an interfragmentary screw, combined with locking plate design, enhances stability for simple oblique distal fibular fractures. The FMLP presents itself as potential as an alternative for lateral malleolus fractures from a biomechanical perspective. Nevertheless, further verification of these results is imperative through subsequent clinical studies.
Displaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and clinically efficacy of locking plates and lag screws, particularly in Weber A and B distal fibular fractures remains a subject of contention. This study examines two locking plate designs for lateral malleolus fractures, evaluating their performance with and without interfragmentary screws using finite element models. Utilising CT images of a healthy adult male volunteer, a three-dimensional finite element model was constructed. The Fibula-specific Flank Multiaxial Locking Anatomic Plate (FMLP) and the Conventional Locking Plate (CLP) were subjected to stabilisation, both with and without an interfragmentary screw, mimicking the Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus oblique fracture fixation. Loads of 140 N and 70 N, equivalent to 20% of the body weight, were applied to simulate the single-leg and two-leg standing conditions in the axial direction. The von Mises stress (VMS) distributions and element displacements were subsequently analyzed. In the Danis-Weber A fracture model group, the FMLP with an interfragmentary screw fixation exhibited the lowest peak VMS values: 51.9 MPa in the fibula, 89.0 MPa in the plate, and 61.3 MPa in the screws for simulating single-leg conditions. Under two-leg standing conditions, these peak VMS values decreased to 25.9 MPa in the fibula, 44.5 MPa in the plate, and 30.6 MPa in the screws, respectively. Furthermore, the overall structural peak displacements during single-leg standing for both Weber-A and B fractures with different implants ranged from 1.61 to 2.54 mm. While standing on two feet, the ranged was from 0.80 to 1.27 mm. An interfragmentary screw at the oblique fracture site resulted in reduced the peak value of VMS in the fibula, plate, screws, consequently decreased the overall structural displacement for FMLP and CLP fixation in lateral malleolus fractures. The current finite element analysis (FEA) demonstrates that FMLP exhibits superior mechanical characteristics in Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus fractures compared to CLP. The inclusion of an interfragmentary screw, combined with locking plate design, enhances stability for simple oblique distal fibular fractures. The FMLP presents itself as potential as an alternative for lateral malleolus fractures from a biomechanical perspective. Nevertheless, further verification of these results is imperative through subsequent clinical studies.
Displaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and clinically efficacy of locking plates and lag screws, particularly in Weber A and B distal fibular fractures remains a subject of contention. This study examines two locking plate designs for lateral malleolus fractures, evaluating their performance with and without interfragmentary screws using finite element models. Utilising CT images of a healthy adult male volunteer, a three-dimensional finite element model was constructed. The Fibula-specific Flank Multiaxial Locking Anatomic Plate (FMLP) and the Conventional Locking Plate (CLP) were subjected to stabilisation, both with and without an interfragmentary screw, mimicking the Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus oblique fracture fixation. Loads of 140 N and 70 N, equivalent to 20% of the body weight, were applied to simulate the single-leg and two-leg standing conditions in the axial direction. The von Mises stress (VMS) distributions and element displacements were subsequently analyzed. In the Danis-Weber A fracture model group, the FMLP with an interfragmentary screw fixation exhibited the lowest peak VMS values: 51.9 MPa in the fibula, 89.0 MPa in the plate, and 61.3 MPa in the screws for simulating single-leg conditions. Under two-leg standing conditions, these peak VMS values decreased to 25.9 MPa in the fibula, 44.5 MPa in the plate, and 30.6 MPa in the screws, respectively. Furthermore, the overall structural peak displacements during single-leg standing for both Weber-A and B fractures with different implants ranged from 1.61 to 2.54 mm. While standing on two feet, the ranged was from 0.80 to 1.27 mm. An interfragmentary screw at the oblique fracture site resulted in reduced the peak value of VMS in the fibula, plate, screws, consequently decreased the overall structural displacement for FMLP and CLP fixation in lateral malleolus fractures. The current finite element analysis (FEA) demonstrates that FMLP exhibits superior mechanical characteristics in Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus fractures compared to CLP. The inclusion of an interfragmentary screw, combined with locking plate design, enhances stability for simple oblique distal fibular fractures. The FMLP presents itself as potential as an alternative for lateral malleolus fractures from a biomechanical perspective. Nevertheless, further verification of these results is imperative through subsequent clinical studies.
Background Displaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and clinically efficacy of locking plates and lag screws, particularly in Weber A and B distal fibular fractures remains a subject of contention. This study examines two locking plate designs for lateral malleolus fractures, evaluating their performance with and without interfragmentary screws using finite element models. Methods Utilising CT images of a healthy adult male volunteer, a three-dimensional finite element model was constructed. The Fibula-specific Flank Multiaxial Locking Anatomic Plate (FMLP) and the Conventional Locking Plate (CLP) were subjected to stabilisation, both with and without an interfragmentary screw, mimicking the Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus oblique fracture fixation. Loads of 140 N and 70 N, equivalent to 20% of the body weight, were applied to simulate the single-leg and two-leg standing conditions in the axial direction. The von Mises stress (VMS) distributions and element displacements were subsequently analyzed. Results In the Danis-Weber A fracture model group, the FMLP with an interfragmentary screw fixation exhibited the lowest peak VMS values: 51.9 MPa in the fibula, 89.0 MPa in the plate, and 61.3 MPa in the screws for simulating single-leg conditions. Under two-leg standing conditions, these peak VMS values decreased to 25.9 MPa in the fibula, 44.5 MPa in the plate, and 30.6 MPa in the screws, respectively. Furthermore, the overall structural peak displacements during single-leg standing for both Weber-A and B fractures with different implants ranged from 1.61 to 2.54 mm. While standing on two feet, the ranged was from 0.80 to 1.27 mm. An interfragmentary screw at the oblique fracture site resulted in reduced the peak value of VMS in the fibula, plate, screws, consequently decreased the overall structural displacement for FMLP and CLP fixation in lateral malleolus fractures. Conclusions The current finite element analysis (FEA) demonstrates that FMLP exhibits superior mechanical characteristics in Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus fractures compared to CLP. The inclusion of an interfragmentary screw, combined with locking plate design, enhances stability for simple oblique distal fibular fractures. The FMLP presents itself as potential as an alternative for lateral malleolus fractures from a biomechanical perspective. Nevertheless, further verification of these results is imperative through subsequent clinical studies. Keywords: Finite element, Ankle fracture, Fibular fracture, Osteosynthesis, Fracture fixation
BackgroundDisplaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and clinically efficacy of locking plates and lag screws, particularly in Weber A and B distal fibular fractures remains a subject of contention. This study examines two locking plate designs for lateral malleolus fractures, evaluating their performance with and without interfragmentary screws using finite element models.MethodsUtilising CT images of a healthy adult male volunteer, a three-dimensional finite element model was constructed. The Fibula-specific Flank Multiaxial Locking Anatomic Plate (FMLP) and the Conventional Locking Plate (CLP) were subjected to stabilisation, both with and without an interfragmentary screw, mimicking the Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus oblique fracture fixation. Loads of 140 N and 70 N, equivalent to 20% of the body weight, were applied to simulate the single-leg and two-leg standing conditions in the axial direction. The von Mises stress (VMS) distributions and element displacements were subsequently analyzed.ResultsIn the Danis-Weber A fracture model group, the FMLP with an interfragmentary screw fixation exhibited the lowest peak VMS values: 51.9 MPa in the fibula, 89.0 MPa in the plate, and 61.3 MPa in the screws for simulating single-leg conditions. Under two-leg standing conditions, these peak VMS values decreased to 25.9 MPa in the fibula, 44.5 MPa in the plate, and 30.6 MPa in the screws, respectively. Furthermore, the overall structural peak displacements during single-leg standing for both Weber-A and B fractures with different implants ranged from 1.61 to 2.54 mm. While standing on two feet, the ranged was from 0.80 to 1.27 mm. An interfragmentary screw at the oblique fracture site resulted in reduced the peak value of VMS in the fibula, plate, screws, consequently decreased the overall structural displacement for FMLP and CLP fixation in lateral malleolus fractures.ConclusionsThe current finite element analysis (FEA) demonstrates that FMLP exhibits superior mechanical characteristics in Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus fractures compared to CLP. The inclusion of an interfragmentary screw, combined with locking plate design, enhances stability for simple oblique distal fibular fractures. The FMLP presents itself as potential as an alternative for lateral malleolus fractures from a biomechanical perspective. Nevertheless, further verification of these results is imperative through subsequent clinical studies.
Displaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and clinically efficacy of locking plates and lag screws, particularly in Weber A and B distal fibular fractures remains a subject of contention. This study examines two locking plate designs for lateral malleolus fractures, evaluating their performance with and without interfragmentary screws using finite element models.BACKGROUNDDisplaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and clinically efficacy of locking plates and lag screws, particularly in Weber A and B distal fibular fractures remains a subject of contention. This study examines two locking plate designs for lateral malleolus fractures, evaluating their performance with and without interfragmentary screws using finite element models.Utilising CT images of a healthy adult male volunteer, a three-dimensional finite element model was constructed. The Fibula-specific Flank Multiaxial Locking Anatomic Plate (FMLP) and the Conventional Locking Plate (CLP) were subjected to stabilisation, both with and without an interfragmentary screw, mimicking the Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus oblique fracture fixation. Loads of 140 N and 70 N, equivalent to 20% of the body weight, were applied to simulate the single-leg and two-leg standing conditions in the axial direction. The von Mises stress (VMS) distributions and element displacements were subsequently analyzed.METHODSUtilising CT images of a healthy adult male volunteer, a three-dimensional finite element model was constructed. The Fibula-specific Flank Multiaxial Locking Anatomic Plate (FMLP) and the Conventional Locking Plate (CLP) were subjected to stabilisation, both with and without an interfragmentary screw, mimicking the Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus oblique fracture fixation. Loads of 140 N and 70 N, equivalent to 20% of the body weight, were applied to simulate the single-leg and two-leg standing conditions in the axial direction. The von Mises stress (VMS) distributions and element displacements were subsequently analyzed.In the Danis-Weber A fracture model group, the FMLP with an interfragmentary screw fixation exhibited the lowest peak VMS values: 51.9 MPa in the fibula, 89.0 MPa in the plate, and 61.3 MPa in the screws for simulating single-leg conditions. Under two-leg standing conditions, these peak VMS values decreased to 25.9 MPa in the fibula, 44.5 MPa in the plate, and 30.6 MPa in the screws, respectively. Furthermore, the overall structural peak displacements during single-leg standing for both Weber-A and B fractures with different implants ranged from 1.61 to 2.54 mm. While standing on two feet, the ranged was from 0.80 to 1.27 mm. An interfragmentary screw at the oblique fracture site resulted in reduced the peak value of VMS in the fibula, plate, screws, consequently decreased the overall structural displacement for FMLP and CLP fixation in lateral malleolus fractures.RESULTSIn the Danis-Weber A fracture model group, the FMLP with an interfragmentary screw fixation exhibited the lowest peak VMS values: 51.9 MPa in the fibula, 89.0 MPa in the plate, and 61.3 MPa in the screws for simulating single-leg conditions. Under two-leg standing conditions, these peak VMS values decreased to 25.9 MPa in the fibula, 44.5 MPa in the plate, and 30.6 MPa in the screws, respectively. Furthermore, the overall structural peak displacements during single-leg standing for both Weber-A and B fractures with different implants ranged from 1.61 to 2.54 mm. While standing on two feet, the ranged was from 0.80 to 1.27 mm. An interfragmentary screw at the oblique fracture site resulted in reduced the peak value of VMS in the fibula, plate, screws, consequently decreased the overall structural displacement for FMLP and CLP fixation in lateral malleolus fractures.The current finite element analysis (FEA) demonstrates that FMLP exhibits superior mechanical characteristics in Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus fractures compared to CLP. The inclusion of an interfragmentary screw, combined with locking plate design, enhances stability for simple oblique distal fibular fractures. The FMLP presents itself as potential as an alternative for lateral malleolus fractures from a biomechanical perspective. Nevertheless, further verification of these results is imperative through subsequent clinical studies.CONCLUSIONSThe current finite element analysis (FEA) demonstrates that FMLP exhibits superior mechanical characteristics in Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus fractures compared to CLP. The inclusion of an interfragmentary screw, combined with locking plate design, enhances stability for simple oblique distal fibular fractures. The FMLP presents itself as potential as an alternative for lateral malleolus fractures from a biomechanical perspective. Nevertheless, further verification of these results is imperative through subsequent clinical studies.
ArticleNumber 981
Audience Academic
Author Wu, Quanzhou
Ye, Fang
Zhu, Junkun
Huang, Shuming
Ye, Jifei
Xing, Hailin
Yang, Ruifeng
Lan, Shuhua
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Shuming
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Shuming
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Junkun
  surname: Zhu
  fullname: Zhu, Junkun
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hailin
  surname: Xing
  fullname: Xing, Hailin
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ruifeng
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Ruifeng
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jifei
  surname: Ye
  fullname: Ye, Jifei
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Fang
  surname: Ye
  fullname: Ye, Fang
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Quanzhou
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Quanzhou
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Shuhua
  surname: Lan
  fullname: Lan, Shuhua
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38114924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9ks1uEzEUhUeoiLaBF2CBLLFhM8V_M55ZoVAoVKrEBsTSuvFcB0fOONgeRDY8O05SSlMh5IUt-7vHPr7nvDoZw4hV9ZzRC8a69nVivOtZTbmoqWKsqemj6oxJxWoulTy5tz6tzlNaUcpUJ_on1anoGJM9l2fVrys3uowEPa5xzARG8NvkUlkMBMjG-ZBJytOwJcGSwVmLccdZ9xOyCyMxYUw5TiYnYkMk72B0qf6KC4xkvhd5SzxkjODJGrzH4KdCRjB5ipieVo8t-ITPbudZ9eXq_efLj_XNpw_Xl_Ob2jStzLVgQg2dWDBuBAXVGxisQFPcQy-opFQJ27HGcMta7BvgA7ambxugVlhsBjGrrg-6Q4CV3kS3hrjVAZzeb4S41BCzMx71IBtAxjnwjsuhMyBbWFgpuwUy04u-aL05aG2mxRoHU76juDsSPT4Z3Te9DD80o4r3TWnBrHp1qxDD9wlT1muXDHoPI4Ypad5TyZpWSFHQlw_QVZhiadKOYrK8UQn6l1pCceBGG8rFZieq50q1qqdK7aiLf1BlDLh2pY9oXdk_Knhx3-mdxT_xKQA_ACaGlCLaO4RRvcuoPmRUl4zqfUb1TrV7UGRc3oepPMf5_5X-BtvT6p8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_cnm_3895
Cites_doi 10.1177/1938640018788433
10.1016/j.fas.2021.01.013
10.1243/09544119jeim799
10.1016/j.fas.2016.04.004
10.1016/j.fas.2015.06.007
10.1039/d0sm00762e
10.1007/s00402-021-04232-0
10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.012
10.1007/s00405-023-07866-5
10.7759/cureus.9430
10.3109/17453679809002355
10.1177/107110070502600403
10.1016/j.fas.2014.03.005
10.1186/s12891-022-05804-w
10.1016/j.injury.2011.07.009
10.1053/j.jfas.2006.09.009
10.1007/s00590-021-02927-z
10.1155/2022/7101007
10.1016/j.injury.2019.02.008
10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.028
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.01.005
10.1016/j.jor.2018.05.011
10.1186/s12891-018-2326-x
10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00417
10.1016/j.fas.2021.11.006
10.1115/1.1318904
10.1186/s12891-021-04009-x
10.1097/bot.0000000000001754
10.1016/j.stam.2003.09.002
10.1177/107110078100200104
10.1177/10711007211040508
10.1186/s12891-018-1989-7
10.1111/os.13160
10.1097/00003086-199609000-00034
10.1177/1071100713496223
10.1080/08941939.2019.1567875
10.1186/s13018-021-02334-4
10.1308/003588415x14181254790086
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.01.024
10.1007/s00590-020-02771-7
10.1080/10255842.2022.2032681
10.1177/09544119211048286
10.4103/0019-5413.114918
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QP
7RV
7TK
7TS
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1P
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12891-023-07115-0
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Physical Education Index
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Physical Education Index
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE

Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1471-2474
EndPage 13
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_d45ae122a2824d8ca46abf448be1c939
PMC10729578
A776790770
38114924
10_1186_s12891_023_07115_0
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
– name: United States--US
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: the Lishui Science and Technology Plan Project
  grantid: 2021SJZC011
– fundername: Zhejiang Provincial Technological Research Project for Public Welfare
  grantid: 2013C33223
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7RV
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
-A0
3V.
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
7QP
7TK
7TS
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-3137d83b12c30a79cadf3ec891a93040073f815c2f16e95a2de6c965a0f3fe5d3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1471-2474
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:30:37 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:37:44 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 05 11:37:54 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 00:15:57 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:27:29 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:15:55 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:10:18 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:09:30 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:07:19 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Fracture fixation
Osteosynthesis
Ankle fracture
Fibular fracture
Finite element
Language English
License 2023. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c564t-3137d83b12c30a79cadf3ec891a93040073f815c2f16e95a2de6c965a0f3fe5d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12891-023-07115-0
PMID 38114924
PQID 2914282730
PQPubID 44767
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d45ae122a2824d8ca46abf448be1c939
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10729578
proquest_miscellaneous_2904156343
proquest_journals_2914282730
gale_infotracmisc_A776790770
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A776790770
pubmed_primary_38114924
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_023_07115_0
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12891_023_07115_0
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-12-19
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-12-19
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-12-19
  day: 19
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC musculoskeletal disorders
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Musculoskelet Disord
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References RW Jordan (7115_CR7) 2018; 24
M Zyskowski (7115_CR10) 2021; 22
J Zha (7115_CR9) 2022; 2022
J Wang (7115_CR25) 2020; 33
BC Yemineni (7115_CR32) 2020; 12
NA Hasami (7115_CR13) 2022; 43
DD Anderson (7115_CR27) 2007; 40
J Marvan (7115_CR22) 2017; 19
7115_CR8
F Zhenhua (7115_CR44) 2013; 47
M Hollensteiner (7115_CR16) 2022; 28
DB Tas (7115_CR6) 2019; 58
J Li (7115_CR18) 2019; 50
TT Eckel (7115_CR15) 2013; 34
G Manoharan (7115_CR17) 2018; 15
T Kim (7115_CR38) 2007; 46
CM Court-Brown (7115_CR3) 1998; 69
A Durst (7115_CR28) 2015; 97
J Hallbauer (7115_CR41) 2014; 20
RC Bitar (7115_CR4) 2021; 31
DD Vance (7115_CR11) 2019; 12
JH Ahn (7115_CR14) 2021; 13
H Xu (7115_CR35) 2022; 23
RM Danilkowicz (7115_CR5) 2022; 32
LUR Sica (7115_CR33) 2020; 16
PJ Switaj (7115_CR40) 2016; 22
M Weber (7115_CR37) 2005; 26
Y Zhang (7115_CR42) 2021; 16
Y Guo (7115_CR34) 2022; 25
S Rafiei (7115_CR36) 2022; 236
Y Fan (7115_CR23) 2008; 23
A Milstrey (7115_CR1) 2022; 142
D Segal (7115_CR30) 1981; 2
M Niinomi (7115_CR43) 2016; 4
J Chen (7115_CR31) 2023; 280
A Anwar (7115_CR19) 2017; 48
A Anwar (7115_CR20) 2018; 19
RK Zahn (7115_CR39) 2012; 43
AA Aiyer (7115_CR12) 2019; 27
O Chan (7115_CR45) 2022; 28
S Eberle (7115_CR24) 2010; 224
7115_CR29
H Juto (7115_CR2) 2018; 19
7115_CR26
A Gefen (7115_CR21) 2000; 122
References_xml – volume: 12
  start-page: 246
  year: 2019
  ident: 7115_CR11
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Spec
  doi: 10.1177/1938640018788433
– volume: 28
  start-page: 62
  year: 2022
  ident: 7115_CR45
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.01.013
– volume: 224
  start-page: 1141
  year: 2010
  ident: 7115_CR24
  publication-title: Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]
  doi: 10.1243/09544119jeim799
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 7115_CR7
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.04.004
– volume: 22
  start-page: 158
  year: 2016
  ident: 7115_CR40
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.06.007
– volume: 16
  start-page: 7576
  year: 2020
  ident: 7115_CR33
  publication-title: Soft Matter
  doi: 10.1039/d0sm00762e
– volume: 142
  start-page: 3771
  year: 2022
  ident: 7115_CR1
  publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04232-0
– volume: 48
  start-page: 825
  year: 2017
  ident: 7115_CR19
  publication-title: Injury
  doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.012
– volume: 280
  start-page: 3287
  year: 2023
  ident: 7115_CR31
  publication-title: Eur Arch oto-rhino-Laryngol
  doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07866-5
– volume: 12
  start-page: e9430
  year: 2020
  ident: 7115_CR32
  publication-title: Cureus
  doi: 10.7759/cureus.9430
– volume: 69
  start-page: 43
  year: 1998
  ident: 7115_CR3
  publication-title: Acta Orthop Scand
  doi: 10.3109/17453679809002355
– volume: 26
  start-page: 281
  year: 2005
  ident: 7115_CR37
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Int
  doi: 10.1177/107110070502600403
– volume: 20
  start-page: 180
  year: 2014
  ident: 7115_CR41
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2014.03.005
– volume: 23
  start-page: 851
  year: 2022
  ident: 7115_CR35
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05804-w
– volume: 43
  start-page: 718
  year: 2012
  ident: 7115_CR39
  publication-title: Injury
  doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.07.009
– volume: 46
  start-page: 2
  year: 2007
  ident: 7115_CR38
  publication-title: J Foot Ankle Surg
  doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2006.09.009
– volume: 32
  start-page: 113
  year: 2022
  ident: 7115_CR5
  publication-title: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
  doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02927-z
– volume: 2022
  start-page: 7101007
  year: 2022
  ident: 7115_CR9
  publication-title: Contrast Media Mol Imaging
  doi: 10.1155/2022/7101007
– volume: 50
  start-page: 648
  year: 2019
  ident: 7115_CR18
  publication-title: Injury
  doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.02.008
– volume: 58
  start-page: 119
  year: 2019
  ident: 7115_CR6
  publication-title: J Foot Ankle Surg
  doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.028
– volume: 19
  start-page: 33
  year: 2017
  ident: 7115_CR22
  publication-title: Acta Bioeng Biomech
– volume: 23
  start-page: S7
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 7115_CR23
  publication-title: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.01.005
– volume: 15
  start-page: 549
  year: 2018
  ident: 7115_CR17
  publication-title: J Orthop
  doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.05.011
– volume: 19
  start-page: 441
  year: 2018
  ident: 7115_CR2
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2326-x
– volume: 27
  start-page: 50
  year: 2019
  ident: 7115_CR12
  publication-title: J Am Acad Orthop Surg
  doi: 10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00417
– volume: 28
  start-page: 845
  year: 2022
  ident: 7115_CR16
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.11.006
– volume: 122
  start-page: 630
  year: 2000
  ident: 7115_CR21
  publication-title: J Biomech Eng
  doi: 10.1115/1.1318904
– volume: 22
  start-page: 159
  year: 2021
  ident: 7115_CR10
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04009-x
– ident: 7115_CR8
  doi: 10.1097/bot.0000000000001754
– ident: 7115_CR26
– volume: 4
  start-page: 445
  issue: 5
  year: 2016
  ident: 7115_CR43
  publication-title: Sci Technol Adv Mater
  doi: 10.1016/j.stam.2003.09.002
– volume: 2
  start-page: 25
  year: 1981
  ident: 7115_CR30
  publication-title: Foot Ankle
  doi: 10.1177/107110078100200104
– volume: 43
  start-page: 280
  year: 2022
  ident: 7115_CR13
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Int.
  doi: 10.1177/10711007211040508
– volume: 19
  start-page: 73
  year: 2018
  ident: 7115_CR20
  publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
  doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1989-7
– volume: 13
  start-page: 2301
  year: 2021
  ident: 7115_CR14
  publication-title: Orthop Surg
  doi: 10.1111/os.13160
– ident: 7115_CR29
  doi: 10.1097/00003086-199609000-00034
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1588
  year: 2013
  ident: 7115_CR15
  publication-title: Foot Ankle Int
  doi: 10.1177/1071100713496223
– volume: 33
  start-page: 699
  year: 2020
  ident: 7115_CR25
  publication-title: J Investig Surg
  doi: 10.1080/08941939.2019.1567875
– volume: 16
  start-page: 191
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 7115_CR42
  publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res.
  doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02334-4
– volume: 97
  start-page: 409
  year: 2015
  ident: 7115_CR28
  publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
  doi: 10.1308/003588415x14181254790086
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1662
  year: 2007
  ident: 7115_CR27
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.01.024
– volume: 31
  start-page: 407
  year: 2021
  ident: 7115_CR4
  publication-title: Eur J Orthop SurgTraumatol
  doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02771-7
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1663
  year: 2022
  ident: 7115_CR34
  publication-title: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin
  doi: 10.1080/10255842.2022.2032681
– volume: 236
  start-page: 188
  year: 2022
  ident: 7115_CR36
  publication-title: Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]
  doi: 10.1177/09544119211048286
– volume: 47
  start-page: 364
  year: 2013
  ident: 7115_CR44
  publication-title: Indian J Orthop
  doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.114918
SSID ssj0017839
Score 2.3838758
Snippet Displaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and clinically efficacy of...
Background Displaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and clinically...
BackgroundDisplaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and clinically...
Abstract Background Displaced lateral malleolus fractures are typically stabilised through open reduction and internal fixation. The biomechanically and...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 981
SubjectTerms Adult
Analysis
Ankle
Ankle fracture
Ankle Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Ankle Fractures - surgery
Biomechanical Phenomena
Biomechanics
Body weight
Bone implants
Bone Plates
Care and treatment
Diagnosis
Fibula
Fibular fracture
Finite element
Finite Element Analysis
Finite element method
Fracture fixation
Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods
Fractures
Fractures, Multiple
Humans
Internal fixation in fractures
Leg
Male
Mathematical models
Osteosynthesis
Patient outcomes
Pilot Projects
Transplants & implants
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEF6hnrggaHkYClokBAdk1fv0-piiRhUHTlT0tlqP1yJSaldNKtFLf3tn1nYUC4leuEXesePdeScz3zD2qbF16QBsrl1ocw2hzp01aAwdgXmBxiA7VVv8sOcX-vuludwb9UU1YQM88HBwJ402IQopA-YGunEQtA11i0lFHQVUKrXuoc-bkqnx_4MS_f7UIuPsyQatMFX4SEUNO8LkxcwNJbT-v23ynlOaF0zueaDlc_ZsDB35YnjlF-xJ7A7Z0aLDtPnqjn_mqZgz_Up-xO6XKwomeRyqw3kYsUfwQ8MDv16t-y1P0LK8b_k0JWXL29WfxCoO_Qgtu-EY1nLqRN_kv5AXN3yRHnLK14G6l9f8isaxoAQjJbVc3WIC_5JdLM9-fjvPx1ELORirt2iJVdk4VQsJqghlBaFpVQQ8tFAp0vNStU4YkK2wsTJBNtFCZU0oWtVG06hX7KDru_iGcYzJLNhohIpOE5YO5sCxbqB00TqIJmNiOnkPIw45jcNY-5SPOOsHbnnklk_c8kXGvu7uuR5QOP5JfUoM3VESgna6gHLlR7nyj8lVxr6QOHjSc3w9CGO7Am6SELP8gmCQqqIs8euOZ5SonzBfngTKj_Zh42VFSHcYOuLyx90y3Uk1b13sb4mG4BOs0ipjrwf5220J4yxMbaXOmJtJ5mzP85Vu9TuhhwvCike2vP0fp_SOPZWkVULmojpmByiY8T1Gadv6Q1LIBzZtOV0
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagXLggoDxCCzISggOKGsePOCe0RawqDpyo2Jvl2A6stE223a0El_52ZhwnNELqbbWe7MaZtzPzDSHvvGoq7ZzKhbZtLpxtcq0kGEONYF5OQJAdqy2-qbNz8XUlV-nAbZfKKkebGA217x2ekZ-UNWKDgbMtPm0vc5wahW9X0wiN--QBQpdhSVe1mhIuVoH3HxtltDrZgS3GOp-SY9sOk3kxc0YRs_9_y3zLNc3LJm_5oeVj8igFkHQxcPwJuRe6p-Rw0UHyfPGHvqexpDOelR-Sm-UaQ0oahhpxahMCCXzw1NLtetPvaQSYpX1Lx1kpe9quf0eGUdcngNkdheCWYj_6Lv8BHLmii_gjp3RjsYd5Qy9wKAvIMVBi49U1pPHPyPnyy_fPZ3kauJA7qcQe7DGvvOYNKx0vbFU761seHDw0W3PU9oq3mklXtkyFWtrSB-VqJW3R8jZIz5-Tg67vwktCITJTTgXJeNACEXUgEw6Nd5UOSrsgM8LGJ29cQiPHoRgbE7MSrczALQPcMpFbpsjIx-ma7YDFcSf1KTJ0okQc7fhFf_XTJLU0XkgbWFlaEC3htbNC2aaFlLUJzNW8zsgHFAeD2g6352xqWoBNIm6WWSAYUl1UFfzd8YwStNTNl0eBMslK7Mw_mc7I22kZr8TKty7010iDIAqKC56RF4P8TVuCaAsS3FJkRM8kc7bn-Uq3_hUxxBkixgNbXt19X0fkYYn6wsqc1cfkAEQuvIYobN-8iar2F8CPMGw
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Finite element analysis and a pilot study of different fixation constructs for Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus fractures
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38114924
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2914282730
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2904156343
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10729578
https://doaj.org/article/d45ae122a2824d8ca46abf448be1c939
Volume 24
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LbxMxELZKe-GCgPIIlMhICA5oIV4_94DQBjWqIlEhICI3y-v1QqR0tySp1F747cw4u6ErKiROieLZhz0Pzzgz3xDyolSFNt6rRBhXJcK7IjFKgjE0COblBTjZMdviVJ3MxHQu53uka3fULuD6xtAO-0nNVss3lz-v3oPCv4sKb9TbNdhYzN9JOZbjMJlACH8AO5NGRf0o_vyroE3sLMbAICep0KIrornxHr2NKuL5_221r21b_ZTKa3vU5C650zqXNN9Kwz2yF-r75DCvIbA-u6IvaUz3jOfoh-TXZIHuJg3b_HHqWnQS-FJSR88Xy2ZDI_gsbSra9VHZ0GpxGZlJfdOCz64pOL4Ua9XXyTfg1orm8SZjunRY37ykZ9iwBWQcKLEo6wJC_AdkNjn--uEkaZsxJF4qsQFbzXVpeMFSz0dOZ96VFQ8eFs1lHC2B5pVh0qcVUyGTLi2D8pmSblTxKsiSPyT7dVOHx4SC16a8CpLxYASi7UCUHIrSaxOU8UEOCOtW3voWqRwbZixtjFiMsltuWeCWjdyyowF5vbvmfIvT8U_qMTJ0R4kY2_GHZvXdtiprSyFdYGnqICoVpfFOKFdUEM4WgfmMZwPyCsXBomzC63nXFjTAJBFTy-YIlJSNtIbHHfUoQYN9f7gTKNspgE0zxMID5xKGn--G8UrMiqtDc4E0CLCguOAD8mgrf7spgScGwW8qBsT0JLM35_5IvfgR8cUZoskDW57815o-JbdTVB-WJiw7IvsggeEZOGybYkhu6bkekoM8n36Zwuf4-PTT52E8_hhGDf0NgF8-OA
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbK9gAXBJRHoICReBxQ1MR2HOeA0C501dKyQqgVvRnHcWClbbJstoJe-En8Rma8ydIIqbfeovXk4Z3P45lk5htCnhcyT5W1MhTKlKGwJg-VTMAYKiTzsgKcbJ9tMZF7x-LDSXKyQf50tTCYVtnZRG-oi9riO_IdliE3GGy20dv5jxC7RuHX1a6FxgoWB-78J4RszZv996DfF4yNd4_e7YVtV4HQJlIswejwtFA8j5nlkUkza4qSO6uy2GQcIZ3yUsWJZWUsXZYYVjhpM5mYqOSlSwoO171GNgWHUGZANke7k0-f198tUvA3utIcJXcasP6YWcQ4FgrFSRj1tj_fJeD_veDCZthP1Lyw841vkZuty0qHK4zdJhuuukO2hhWE66fn9CX1SaT-7fwW-T2eohNL3SornZqW8wQOCmrofDqrl9RT2tK6pF13liUtp788RKitW0rbhoI7TbECvgm_AAYWdOgvMqIzg1XTM3qKbWBg5YAklnqdLVxzlxxfiTLukUFVV-4BoeALSitdEnOnBHL4QOzt8sKmykllXRKQuPvntW35z7ENx0z7OEhJvdKWBm1pry0dBeT1-pz5iv3jUukRKnQticzd_od68U23hkAXIjEuZswAmEWhrBHS5CUEybmLbcazgLxCOGi0L_B41rRlEjBJZOrSQ6RfyqI0hdtt9yTBLtj-cAco3dqlRv9bRQF5th7GMzHXrnL1GcogbYPkggfk_gp_6ymBfwchNRMBUT1k9ubcH6mm3z1reYwc9aCWh5c_11Nyfe_o46E-3J8cPCI3GK6dmIVxtk0GAD_3GHzAZf6kXXiUfL3qtf4XWPtuaw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Finite+element+analysis+and+a+pilot+study+of+different+fixation+constructs+for+Danis-Weber+A+and+B+lateral+malleolus+fractures&rft.jtitle=BMC+musculoskeletal+disorders&rft.au=Huang%2C+Shuming&rft.au=Zhu%2C+Junkun&rft.au=Xing%2C+Hailin&rft.au=Yang%2C+Ruifeng&rft.date=2023-12-19&rft.issn=1471-2474&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12891-023-07115-0&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s12891_023_07115_0
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon