Gay and Lesbian Couples in Italy: Comparisons with Heterosexual Couples

Assessing couple relationships across diverse languages and cultures has important implications for both clinical intervention and prevention. This is especially true for nontraditional relationships potentially subject to various expressions of negative societal evaluation or bias. Few empirically...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFamily process Vol. 53; no. 4; pp. 702 - 716
Main Authors Antonelli, Paolo, Dèttore, Davide, Lasagni, Irene, Snyder, Douglas K., Balderrama-Durbin, Christina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, NJ Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2014
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0014-7370
1545-5300
1545-5300
DOI10.1111/famp.12078

Cover

Abstract Assessing couple relationships across diverse languages and cultures has important implications for both clinical intervention and prevention. This is especially true for nontraditional relationships potentially subject to various expressions of negative societal evaluation or bias. Few empirically validated measures of relationship functioning have been developed for cross‐cultural applications, and none have been examined for their psychometric sufficiency for evaluating same‐sex couples across different languages and cultures. The current study examined the psychometric properties of an Italian translation of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory – Revised (MSI‐R), a 150‐item 13‐scale measure of couple relationship functioning, for its use in assessing the intimate relationships of gay and lesbian couples in Italy. Results for these couples were compared to data from heterosexual married and unmarried cohabiting couples from the same geographical region, as well as to previously published data for gay, lesbian, and unmarried heterosexual couples from the United States. Findings suggest that, despite unique societal pressures confronting Italian same‐sex couples, these relationships appear resilient and fare well both overall and in specific domains of functioning compared to heterosexual couples both in Italy and the United States. La evaluación de las relaciones de pareja entre distintos idiomas y culturas tiene importantes consecuencias tanto para la intervención como para la prevención clínica. Esto es especialmente cierto en el caso de las relaciones no tradicionales que pueden estar sujetas a diferentes expresiones de evaluación negativa o prejuicio de la sociedad. Se han desarrollado pocas evaluaciones del funcionamiento de una relación validadas empíricamente para usos multiculturales y no se ha analizado la capacidad psicométrica de ninguna para evaluar las parejas del mismo sexo entre diferentes idiomas y culturas. En el presente estudio se analizaron las propiedades psicométricas de una traducción italiana del “Inventario de Satisfacción Marital – Versión revisada” (Marital Satisfaction Inventory – Revised, MSI‐R), una evaluación de 13 escalas y 150 puntos del funcionamiento de la relación de pareja para utilizarla en la evaluación de las relaciones íntimas de parejas de homosexuales y lesbianas en Italia. Los resultados de estas parejas se compararon con datos de parejas heterosexuales casadas y en concubinato de la misma región geográfica así como con datos publicados anteriormente de parejas homosexuales, lesbianas y heterosexuales en concubinato de Estados Unidos. Los resultados sugieren que, a pesar de las presiones características de la sociedad que enfrentan las parejas italianas del mismo sexo, estas relaciones parecen resistentes y prosperan tanto en los aspectos generales como específicos del funcionamiento en comparación con las parejas heterosexuales de Italia y Estados Unidos. 评估跨语言和文化的伴侣关系对临床干预和预防都具有重要意义。这对潜在遭遇各种消极社会评估或偏见表达的非传统关系尤为正确。 很少有为跨文化应用而制定的经过实践验证的关系功能量表,而且没有量表被考察过其评估跨不同语言和文化的同性伴侣的心理测量充分性。 本项研究考察了含150个条目、13个等级的夫妇关系功能量表的婚姻满意度清单(改订版)(MSI‐R)的意大利语翻译在评估意大利男同和女同伴侣的亲密关系的心理测量方面的性能。这些同性伴侣的测量结果与同一地区的已婚和未婚异性同居伴侣的数据进行了比较,也同已出版的美国男同、女同和非婚异性伴侣数据进行了比较。结果发现,与意大利和美国的异性伴侣相比,意大利同性伴侣虽然面临独特的社会压力,但这些关系在总体和具体的功能领域内都显得富有弹性、相当良好。 Video
AbstractList Assessing couple relationships across diverse languages and cultures has important implications for both clinical intervention and prevention. This is especially true for nontraditional relationships potentially subject to various expressions of negative societal evaluation or bias. Few empirically validated measures of relationship functioning have been developed for cross-cultural applications, and none have been examined for their psychometric sufficiency for evaluating same-sex couples across different languages and cultures. The current study examined the psychometric properties of an Italian translation of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory - Revised (MSI-R), a 150-item 13-scale measure of couple relationship functioning, for its use in assessing the intimate relationships of gay and lesbian couples in Italy. Results for these couples were compared to data from heterosexual married and unmarried cohabiting couples from the same geographical region, as well as to previously published data for gay, lesbian, and unmarried heterosexual couples from the United States. Findings suggest that, despite unique societal pressures confronting Italian same-sex couples, these relationships appear resilient and fare well both overall and in specific domains of functioning compared to heterosexual couples both in Italy and the United States.Assessing couple relationships across diverse languages and cultures has important implications for both clinical intervention and prevention. This is especially true for nontraditional relationships potentially subject to various expressions of negative societal evaluation or bias. Few empirically validated measures of relationship functioning have been developed for cross-cultural applications, and none have been examined for their psychometric sufficiency for evaluating same-sex couples across different languages and cultures. The current study examined the psychometric properties of an Italian translation of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory - Revised (MSI-R), a 150-item 13-scale measure of couple relationship functioning, for its use in assessing the intimate relationships of gay and lesbian couples in Italy. Results for these couples were compared to data from heterosexual married and unmarried cohabiting couples from the same geographical region, as well as to previously published data for gay, lesbian, and unmarried heterosexual couples from the United States. Findings suggest that, despite unique societal pressures confronting Italian same-sex couples, these relationships appear resilient and fare well both overall and in specific domains of functioning compared to heterosexual couples both in Italy and the United States.
Assessing couple relationships across diverse languages and cultures has important implications for both clinical intervention and prevention. This is especially true for nontraditional relationships potentially subject to various expressions of negative societal evaluation or bias. Few empirically validated measures of relationship functioning have been developed for cross-cultural applications, and none have been examined for their psychometric sufficiency for evaluating same-sex couples across different languages and cultures. The current study examined the psychometric properties of an Italian translation of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory - Revised (MSI-R), a 150-item 13-scale measure of couple relationship functioning, for its use in assessing the intimate relationships of gay and lesbian couples in Italy. Results for these couples were compared to data from heterosexual married and unmarried cohabiting couples from the same geographical region, as well as to previously published data for gay, lesbian, and unmarried heterosexual couples from the United States. Findings suggest that, despite unique societal pressures confronting Italian same-sex couples, these relationships appear resilient and fare well both overall and in specific domains of functioning compared to heterosexual couples both in Italy and the United States.
Assessing couple relationships across diverse languages and cultures has important implications for both clinical intervention and prevention. This is especially true for nontraditional relationships potentially subject to various expressions of negative societal evaluation or bias. Few empirically validated measures of relationship functioning have been developed for cross‐cultural applications, and none have been examined for their psychometric sufficiency for evaluating same‐sex couples across different languages and cultures. The current study examined the psychometric properties of an Italian translation of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory – Revised (MSI‐R), a 150‐item 13‐scale measure of couple relationship functioning, for its use in assessing the intimate relationships of gay and lesbian couples in Italy. Results for these couples were compared to data from heterosexual married and unmarried cohabiting couples from the same geographical region, as well as to previously published data for gay, lesbian, and unmarried heterosexual couples from the United States. Findings suggest that, despite unique societal pressures confronting Italian same‐sex couples, these relationships appear resilient and fare well both overall and in specific domains of functioning compared to heterosexual couples both in Italy and the United States. La evaluación de las relaciones de pareja entre distintos idiomas y culturas tiene importantes consecuencias tanto para la intervención como para la prevención clínica. Esto es especialmente cierto en el caso de las relaciones no tradicionales que pueden estar sujetas a diferentes expresiones de evaluación negativa o prejuicio de la sociedad. Se han desarrollado pocas evaluaciones del funcionamiento de una relación validadas empíricamente para usos multiculturales y no se ha analizado la capacidad psicométrica de ninguna para evaluar las parejas del mismo sexo entre diferentes idiomas y culturas. En el presente estudio se analizaron las propiedades psicométricas de una traducción italiana del “Inventario de Satisfacción Marital – Versión revisada” (Marital Satisfaction Inventory – Revised, MSI‐R), una evaluación de 13 escalas y 150 puntos del funcionamiento de la relación de pareja para utilizarla en la evaluación de las relaciones íntimas de parejas de homosexuales y lesbianas en Italia. Los resultados de estas parejas se compararon con datos de parejas heterosexuales casadas y en concubinato de la misma región geográfica así como con datos publicados anteriormente de parejas homosexuales, lesbianas y heterosexuales en concubinato de Estados Unidos. Los resultados sugieren que, a pesar de las presiones características de la sociedad que enfrentan las parejas italianas del mismo sexo, estas relaciones parecen resistentes y prosperan tanto en los aspectos generales como específicos del funcionamiento en comparación con las parejas heterosexuales de Italia y Estados Unidos. 评估跨语言和文化的伴侣关系对临床干预和预防都具有重要意义。这对潜在遭遇各种消极社会评估或偏见表达的非传统关系尤为正确。 很少有为跨文化应用而制定的经过实践验证的关系功能量表,而且没有量表被考察过其评估跨不同语言和文化的同性伴侣的心理测量充分性。 本项研究考察了含150个条目、13个等级的夫妇关系功能量表的婚姻满意度清单(改订版)(MSI‐R)的意大利语翻译在评估意大利男同和女同伴侣的亲密关系的心理测量方面的性能。这些同性伴侣的测量结果与同一地区的已婚和未婚异性同居伴侣的数据进行了比较,也同已出版的美国男同、女同和非婚异性伴侣数据进行了比较。结果发现,与意大利和美国的异性伴侣相比,意大利同性伴侣虽然面临独特的社会压力,但这些关系在总体和具体的功能领域内都显得富有弹性、相当良好。 Video
Assessing couple relationships across diverse languages and cultures has important implications for both clinical intervention and prevention. This is especially true for nontraditional relationships potentially subject to various expressions of negative societal evaluation or bias. Few empirically validated measures of relationship functioning have been developed for cross‐cultural applications, and none have been examined for their psychometric sufficiency for evaluating same‐sex couples across different languages and cultures. The current study examined the psychometric properties of an Italian translation of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory – Revised ( MSI ‐R), a 150‐item 13‐scale measure of couple relationship functioning, for its use in assessing the intimate relationships of gay and lesbian couples in Italy. Results for these couples were compared to data from heterosexual married and unmarried cohabiting couples from the same geographical region, as well as to previously published data for gay, lesbian, and unmarried heterosexual couples from the United States. Findings suggest that, despite unique societal pressures confronting Italian same‐sex couples, these relationships appear resilient and fare well both overall and in specific domains of functioning compared to heterosexual couples both in Italy and the United States. La evaluación de las relaciones de pareja entre distintos idiomas y culturas tiene importantes consecuencias tanto para la intervención como para la prevención clínica. Esto es especialmente cierto en el caso de las relaciones no tradicionales que pueden estar sujetas a diferentes expresiones de evaluación negativa o prejuicio de la sociedad. Se han desarrollado pocas evaluaciones del funcionamiento de una relación validadas empíricamente para usos multiculturales y no se ha analizado la capacidad psicométrica de ninguna para evaluar las parejas del mismo sexo entre diferentes idiomas y culturas. En el presente estudio se analizaron las propiedades psicométricas de una traducción italiana del “Inventario de Satisfacción Marital – Versión revisada” ( Marital Satisfaction Inventory – Revised , MSI ‐R), una evaluación de 13 escalas y 150 puntos del funcionamiento de la relación de pareja para utilizarla en la evaluación de las relaciones íntimas de parejas de homosexuales y lesbianas en Italia. Los resultados de estas parejas se compararon con datos de parejas heterosexuales casadas y en concubinato de la misma región geográfica así como con datos publicados anteriormente de parejas homosexuales, lesbianas y heterosexuales en concubinato de Estados Unidos. Los resultados sugieren que, a pesar de las presiones características de la sociedad que enfrentan las parejas italianas del mismo sexo, estas relaciones parecen resistentes y prosperan tanto en los aspectos generales como específicos del funcionamiento en comparación con las parejas heterosexuales de Italia y Estados Unidos. 评估跨语言和文化的伴侣关系对临床干预和预防都具有重要意义。这对潜在遭遇各种消极社会评估或偏见表达的非传统关系尤为正确。 很少有为跨文化应用而制定的经过实践验证的关系功能量表,而且没有量表被考察过其评估跨不同语言和文化的同性伴侣的心理测量充分性。 本项研究考察了含150个条目、13个等级的夫妇关系功能量表的婚姻满意度清单(改订版)( MSI ‐R)的意大利语翻译在评估意大利男同和女同伴侣的亲密关系的心理测量方面的性能。这些同性伴侣的测量结果与同一地区的已婚和未婚异性同居伴侣的数据进行了比较,也同已出版的美国男同、女同和非婚异性伴侣数据进行了比较。结果发现,与意大利和美国的异性伴侣相比,意大利同性伴侣虽然面临独特的社会压力,但这些关系在总体和具体的功能领域内都显得富有弹性、相当良好。 Video Abstract
Assessing couple relationships across diverse languages and cultures has important implications for both clinical intervention and prevention. This is especially true for nontraditional relationships potentially subject to various expressions of negative societal evaluation or bias. Few empirically validated measures of relationship functioning have been developed for cross-cultural applications, and none have been examined for their psychometric sufficiency for evaluating same-sex couples across different languages and cultures. The current study examined the psychometric properties of an Italian translation of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory - Revised (MSI-R), a 150-item 13-scale measure of couple relationship functioning, for its use in assessing the intimate relationships of gay and lesbian couples in Italy. Results for these couples were compared to data from heterosexual married and unmarried cohabiting couples from the same geographical region, as well as to previously published data for gay, lesbian, and unmarried heterosexual couples from the United States. Findings suggest that, despite unique societal pressures confronting Italian same-sex couples, these relationships appear resilient and fare well both overall and in specific domains of functioning compared to heterosexual couples both in Italy and the United States. Adapted from the source document.
Author Snyder, Douglas K.
Lasagni, Irene
Antonelli, Paolo
Dèttore, Davide
Balderrama-Durbin, Christina
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Paolo
  surname: Antonelli
  fullname: Antonelli, Paolo
  organization: Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Davide
  surname: Dèttore
  fullname: Dèttore, Davide
  email: davide.dettore@unifi.it
  organization: Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Irene
  surname: Lasagni
  fullname: Lasagni, Irene
  organization: The Miller Institute, Florence, Italy
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Douglas K.
  surname: Snyder
  fullname: Snyder, Douglas K.
  organization: Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, TX, College Station
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Christina
  surname: Balderrama-Durbin
  fullname: Balderrama-Durbin, Christina
  organization: Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, TX, College Station
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=29077636$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24867576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqN0l1rFDEUBuAgFbut3vgDZEAEEabmOxnv6mq3hfXjQhG8CWcyGUydyYzJDO3-e7PurkIRMTeB8LwHcs45QUdhCA6hxwSfkXxettCPZ4Ripe-hBRFclIJhfIQWGBNeKqbwMTpJ6RpjzCutHqBjyrVUQskFWq1gU0BoirVLtYdQLId57FwqfCiuJug2r_JLP0L0aQipuPHTt-LSTS4Oyd3O0B38Q3S_hS65R_v7FH2-ePtpeVmuP6yulufr0grJdakr1ggLpK04r5zFQmpXg2yorZXibYtrBowy7rRljDcYGka4FqTGytWUNuwUPd_VHePwY3ZpMr1P1nUdBDfMyRApVSWwptV_UMapEkLTTJ_eodfDHEP-SFa00oQKRrJ6sldz3bvGjNH3EDfm0M0Mnu0BJAtdGyFYn_64Cqustg7vnM1tTNG1xvoJJj-EKYLvDMFmO1izHaz5NdgceXEncqj6V0x2-MZ3bvMPaS7O3308ZMpdxqfJ3f7OQPxuZF4hYb68X5k1IfjN66_SSPYTe2u_Cw
CODEN FAPRDG
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_jmft_12220
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_860260
crossref_primary_10_1111_jmft_12276
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12440_018_0079_3
crossref_primary_10_1080_19359705_2019_1621231
crossref_primary_10_1590_1413_82712020250103
crossref_primary_10_1080_0092623X_2018_1447056
crossref_primary_10_1080_19419899_2018_1555185
crossref_primary_10_1111_famp_12168
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12905_016_0324_4
crossref_primary_10_1080_10720537_2023_2267151
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sexol_2019_06_003
crossref_primary_10_1080_00918369_2019_1607685
crossref_primary_10_1080_15332691_2019_1667937
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sexol_2019_06_004
Cites_doi 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb00384.x
10.1300/J082v45n01_04
10.1037/a0014476
10.1177/002214650604700101
10.1037/0893-3200.17.3.419
10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
10.1300/J082v45n01_02
10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.221
10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085701
10.1007/s10691-007-9064-z
10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00375.x
10.3280/RSC2013-001001
10.1037/a0017942
10.1093/med:psych/9780195310641.003.0020
10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.003
10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.472
10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070154
10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01365.x
10.2307/353528
10.1300/J082v06n03_01
10.1007/s11199-005-3725-7
10.1177/0265407512455269
10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
10.1176/appi.books.9781615377695.lg14
10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x
10.1080/19424620.2011.600586
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2014 Family Process Institute
2015 INIST-CNRS
2014 Family Process Institute.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2014 Family Process Institute
– notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
– notice: 2014 Family Process Institute.
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QJ
7U3
7U4
BHHNA
DWI
K9.
NAPCQ
WZK
7X8
DOI 10.1111/famp.12078
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
Social Services Abstracts
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
Sociological Abstracts
Sociological Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Social Services Abstracts
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
Sociological Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)

CrossRef
MEDLINE
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
Women's Studies
Law
EISSN 1545-5300
EndPage 716
ExternalDocumentID 3515126631
24867576
29077636
10_1111_famp_12078
FAMP12078
ark_67375_WNG_L110DBZ6_6
Genre article
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations Italy
Europe
United States
United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Italy
– name: United States
– name: United States--US
GroupedDBID ---
--Z
-ET
-~X
..I
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
0-V
04C
05W
07C
0R~
10A
186
1OB
1OC
29H
31~
33P
36B
3EH
3V.
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51Y
52M
52O
52Q
52S
52T
52U
52W
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
7RV
7X7
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
85S
88E
8AO
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8R4
8R5
8UM
930
9M8
A04
AAAHA
AABNI
AAESR
AAHHS
AAONW
AAOUF
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYJJ
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABDPE
ABEML
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABSOO
ABUWG
ACAHQ
ACBKW
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACSCC
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADEMA
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADMGS
ADMHG
ADOJX
ADXAS
ADZJE
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFKFF
AFKRA
AFPWT
AFZJQ
AGHSJ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AHMBA
AIAGR
AIFKG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALSLI
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ARALO
ASOEW
ASPBG
ASTYK
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZQEC
AZVAB
B-7
BAFTC
BCR
BCU
BDRZF
BEC
BENPR
BFHJK
BKEYQ
BKNYI
BLC
BMSDO
BMXJE
BNVMJ
BPHCQ
BQESF
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BVXVI
BY8
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
D-C
D-D
D0S
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSSH
DU5
DWQXO
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBC
EBD
EBS
ECF
ECT
ECV
EIHBH
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ENC
ENX
EPS
EPT
ESI
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F5P
FEDTE
FYUFA
FZ0
G-S
G.N
G50
GNUQQ
GODZA
GUQSH
HAOEW
HEHIP
HF~
HGLYW
HMCUK
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
K9-
LATKE
LC2
LC4
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LPU
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M0R
M1P
M2M
M2O
M2S
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSSH
MSFUL
MSSSH
MVM
MXFUL
MXSSH
N04
N06
N9A
NAPCQ
NF~
NHB
O66
O9-
OHT
OIG
P-O
P2P
P2W
P2Y
P4C
PALCI
PCD
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
Q.N
Q11
Q2X
QB0
Q~Q
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RWL
RX1
S0X
SAMSI
SJFOW
SUPJJ
SV3
TAE
UB1
UCV
UHB
UKHRP
UKR
UMD
UPT
V62
V8K
VQA
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WGLLI
WH7
WHG
WIH
WII
WOHZO
WOW
WQ9
WQZ
WRC
WSUWO
WXSBR
XG1
XOL
XSW
YCJ
YCV
YYQ
YZZ
Z0I
ZCA
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WP
AAHQN
AAMNL
AANHP
AAYCA
ACRPL
ACUHS
ACYXJ
ADNMO
AFWVQ
AFYRF
ALVPJ
AAMMB
AAYXX
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
POGQB
PPXIY
PRQQA
08R
AAGJQ
AAJUZ
AAPBV
ABCVL
ABFLS
ABPTK
ACXME
ADDAD
AFMIJ
AFVGU
AGJLS
AJYWA
BBAFP
F20
G8K
IPNFZ
IQODW
K78
PQEST
PQUKI
ZA5
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
VUBTB
7QJ
7U3
7U4
BHHNA
DWI
K9.
WZK
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5648-893d5ca1f9449ec0568eba6d2cb774ff0b3a3234e8c334d0ad314851b07eb22d3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0014-7370
1545-5300
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 04:23:36 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 07:16:41 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 01:06:30 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:02:29 EDT 2025
Fri Nov 25 06:04:27 EST 2022
Tue Aug 05 11:57:14 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:49 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:51:59 EST 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:54:29 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Human
Marital relation
Homosexuality
Social interaction
Heterosexuality
Comparative study
Marital Satisfaction
Same-Sex Couples
关系功能
Italian Marriage
Assessment
matrimonio italiano
男同和女同伴侣
evaluación
同性伴侣
funcionamiento de la relación
parejas del mismo sexo
意大利婚姻
parejas de homosexuales y lesbianas
satisfacción marital
Relationship Functioning
婚姻满意度
评估
Gay and Lesbian Couples
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
2014 Family Process Institute.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5648-893d5ca1f9449ec0568eba6d2cb774ff0b3a3234e8c334d0ad314851b07eb22d3
Notes istex:41E1F7B8929F9EA0899407AFA8BD2C16F151D076
ark:/67375/WNG-L110DBZ6-6
ArticleID:FAMP12078
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/famp.12078
PMID 24867576
PQID 1629812531
PQPubID 49117
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1667950829
proquest_miscellaneous_1634275582
proquest_journals_1629812531
pubmed_primary_24867576
pascalfrancis_primary_29077636
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_famp_12078
crossref_primary_10_1111_famp_12078
wiley_primary_10_1111_famp_12078_FAMP12078
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_L110DBZ6_6
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate December 2014
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2014
  text: December 2014
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Hoboken, NJ
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Hoboken, NJ
– name: United States
– name: Rochester
PublicationTitle Family process
PublicationTitleAlternate Fam. Proc
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley
References Kurdek, L. A. (1998). Relationship outcomes and their predictors: Longitudinal evidence from heterosexual married, gay cohabiting, and lesbian cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 553-568.
Platero, R. (2007). Love and the state: Gay marriage in Spain. Feminist Legal Studies, 15, 329-340.
Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., & Horne, S. G. (2010). Psychological distress, well-being, and legal recognition in same-sex couple relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 82-86.
Newcomb, M. E., & Mustanski, B. (2010). Internalized homophobia and internalizing mental health problems: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 1019-1029.
Whisman, M. A., Snyder, D. K., & Beach, S. R. H. (2009). Screening for marital and relationship discord. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 247-254.
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674-697.
Simons, T., & O'Connell, M. (2003). Married-couple and unmarried partner households: 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved February 8, 2014, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/censr-5.pdf
Snyder, D. K., Castellani, A. M., & Whisman, M. A. (2006). Current status and future directions in couple therapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 317-344.
Snyder, D. K. (1997). Manual for the marital satisfaction inventory-revised. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221-233.
Kurdek, L. A. (2005). What do we know about gay and lesbian couples? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 251-254.
Antonelli, P., & Dèttore, D. (2013). La coppia omosessuale oggi [The homosexual couple today]. Rivista di Sessuologia Clinica, 20, 5-23.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
Barbagli, M., & Colombo, A. (2007). Omosessuali moderni. Gay e lesbiche in Italia [Modern homosexuals. Gay men and lesbians in Italy]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Istituto nazionale di statistica. (2012). Anno 2011. La popolazione omosessuale nella società italiana. Roma: Statistiche Report. [National Institute of Statistics. (2012). Year 2011. The homosexual population in Italian society. Rome: Statistics Report.]
Antonelli, P., Stefanile, C., & Dèttore, D. (2010). Behavioural and cognitive aspects of Italian male same-sex couples: A qualitative research. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 16, 277.
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York: William Marrow.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
Graglia, M. (2009). Psicoterapia e omosessualità [Psychotherapy and homosexuality]. Roma: Carocci editore.
Balderrama-Durbin, C., Snyder, D. K., & Semmar, Y. (2011). Assessing Arabic couples: An evidence-based approach. Family Science, 2, 24-33.
Gotta, G., Green, R. J., Rothblum, E., Solomon, S., Balsam, K., & Schwartz, P. (2011). Heterosexual, lesbian, and gay male relationships: A comparison of couples in 1975 and 2000. Family Process, 50, 353-376.
Gottman, J. M., Levenson, R. W., Gross, J., Frederickson, B. L., McCoy, K., Rosenthal, L. et al. (2003a). Correlates of gay and lesbian couples' relationship satisfaction and relationship dissolution. Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 23-43.
Julien, D., Chartrand, E., Simard, M., Bouthillier, D., & Bègin, J. (2003). Conflict, social support, and relationship quality: An observational study of heterosexual, gay male, and lesbian couples' communication. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 419-428.
Peplau, L. A., & Fingerhut, A. W. (2007). The close relationships of lesbians and gay men. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 405-424.
Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D., Liu, H., & Needham, B. (2006). You make me sick: Marital quality and health over the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47, 1-16.
Antonelli, P. (2012). Il minority stress nella popolazione gay e lesbica italiana: il ruolo dell'omonegatività interiorizzata [Minority stress in the Italian gay and lesbian population: The role of internalized homonegativity]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italia.
Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.) (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472-503.
Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964-980.
Gottman, J. M., Levenson, R. W., Swanson, C., Swanson, K., Tyson, R., & Yoshimoto, D. (2003b). Observing gay, lesbian and heterosexual couples' relationships: Mathematical modeling of conflict interaction. Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 65-91.
Means-Christensen, A. J., Snyder, D. K., & Negy, C. (2003). Assessing nontraditional couples: Validity of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory-Revised (MSI-R) with gay, lesbian, and cohabiting heterosexual couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 69-83.
Whisman, M. A. (2013). Relationship adjustment and the prevalence, incidence, and treatment of psychopathology. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 163-170.
Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2005). Money, housework, sex, and conflict: Same-sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings. Sex Roles, 52, 561-575.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
Peplau, L. A., & Cochran, S. D. (1981). Value orientations in the intimate relationships of gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 6, 1-19.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structure. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
2009; 23
1990; 107
2010; 16
2011; 2
2012
2006; 57
2010
2013; 20
1980; 88
2003b; 45
2009
2008
1981; 6
1997
2007
2006
2003; 17
1993
2004
2003
1998; 60
2007; 58
2007; 15
2001; 127
2003; 129
2010; 24
1990; 25
2006; 47
2011; 50
2013; 30
2000; 62
2005; 52
1983
1998; 3
2003; 29
2013
2003a; 45
2010; 30
1992; 63
2005; 14
e_1_2_5_27_1
Istituto nazionale di statistica (e_1_2_5_21_1) 2012
e_1_2_5_28_1
e_1_2_5_25_1
e_1_2_5_26_1
e_1_2_5_23_1
e_1_2_5_24_1
e_1_2_5_44_1
e_1_2_5_22_1
Whisman M. A. (e_1_2_5_42_1) 2006
e_1_2_5_43_1
Graglia M. (e_1_2_5_18_1) 2009
Gasbarrini M. F. (e_1_2_5_13_1) 2010
e_1_2_5_29_1
Simons T. (e_1_2_5_34_1) 2003
Antonelli P. (e_1_2_5_4_1) 2010; 16
Blumstein P. (e_1_2_5_9_1) 1983
e_1_2_5_20_1
e_1_2_5_41_1
e_1_2_5_40_1
e_1_2_5_15_1
e_1_2_5_38_1
e_1_2_5_14_1
e_1_2_5_39_1
e_1_2_5_17_1
e_1_2_5_36_1
e_1_2_5_16_1
e_1_2_5_8_1
e_1_2_5_11_1
Peplau L. A. (e_1_2_5_31_1) 2004
e_1_2_5_7_1
e_1_2_5_32_1
e_1_2_5_5_1
e_1_2_5_33_1
Barbagli M. (e_1_2_5_6_1) 2007
e_1_2_5_3_1
Elia I. R. (e_1_2_5_12_1) 2013
Green R. J. (e_1_2_5_19_1) 2008
Snyder D. K. (e_1_2_5_35_1) 1997
e_1_2_5_30_1
Antonelli P. (e_1_2_5_2_1) 2012
Bollen K. A. (e_1_2_5_10_1) 1993
Snyder D. K. (e_1_2_5_37_1) 2004
References_xml – reference: Graglia, M. (2009). Psicoterapia e omosessualità [Psychotherapy and homosexuality]. Roma: Carocci editore.
– reference: Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.) (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
– reference: Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York: William Marrow.
– reference: Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2005). Money, housework, sex, and conflict: Same-sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings. Sex Roles, 52, 561-575.
– reference: Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472-503.
– reference: Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D., Liu, H., & Needham, B. (2006). You make me sick: Marital quality and health over the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47, 1-16.
– reference: Newcomb, M. E., & Mustanski, B. (2010). Internalized homophobia and internalizing mental health problems: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 1019-1029.
– reference: Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., & Horne, S. G. (2010). Psychological distress, well-being, and legal recognition in same-sex couple relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 82-86.
– reference: Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964-980.
– reference: Kurdek, L. A. (1998). Relationship outcomes and their predictors: Longitudinal evidence from heterosexual married, gay cohabiting, and lesbian cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 553-568.
– reference: Simons, T., & O'Connell, M. (2003). Married-couple and unmarried partner households: 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved February 8, 2014, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/censr-5.pdf
– reference: Julien, D., Chartrand, E., Simard, M., Bouthillier, D., & Bègin, J. (2003). Conflict, social support, and relationship quality: An observational study of heterosexual, gay male, and lesbian couples' communication. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 419-428.
– reference: Means-Christensen, A. J., Snyder, D. K., & Negy, C. (2003). Assessing nontraditional couples: Validity of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory-Revised (MSI-R) with gay, lesbian, and cohabiting heterosexual couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 69-83.
– reference: Barbagli, M., & Colombo, A. (2007). Omosessuali moderni. Gay e lesbiche in Italia [Modern homosexuals. Gay men and lesbians in Italy]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
– reference: Gottman, J. M., Levenson, R. W., Swanson, C., Swanson, K., Tyson, R., & Yoshimoto, D. (2003b). Observing gay, lesbian and heterosexual couples' relationships: Mathematical modeling of conflict interaction. Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 65-91.
– reference: Istituto nazionale di statistica. (2012). Anno 2011. La popolazione omosessuale nella società italiana. Roma: Statistiche Report. [National Institute of Statistics. (2012). Year 2011. The homosexual population in Italian society. Rome: Statistics Report.]
– reference: Gottman, J. M., Levenson, R. W., Gross, J., Frederickson, B. L., McCoy, K., Rosenthal, L. et al. (2003a). Correlates of gay and lesbian couples' relationship satisfaction and relationship dissolution. Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 23-43.
– reference: Gotta, G., Green, R. J., Rothblum, E., Solomon, S., Balsam, K., & Schwartz, P. (2011). Heterosexual, lesbian, and gay male relationships: A comparison of couples in 1975 and 2000. Family Process, 50, 353-376.
– reference: Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674-697.
– reference: Snyder, D. K. (1997). Manual for the marital satisfaction inventory-revised. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
– reference: Antonelli, P., Stefanile, C., & Dèttore, D. (2010). Behavioural and cognitive aspects of Italian male same-sex couples: A qualitative research. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 16, 277.
– reference: Antonelli, P., & Dèttore, D. (2013). La coppia omosessuale oggi [The homosexual couple today]. Rivista di Sessuologia Clinica, 20, 5-23.
– reference: Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structure. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
– reference: Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
– reference: Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
– reference: Kurdek, L. A. (2005). What do we know about gay and lesbian couples? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 251-254.
– reference: Snyder, D. K., Castellani, A. M., & Whisman, M. A. (2006). Current status and future directions in couple therapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 317-344.
– reference: Antonelli, P. (2012). Il minority stress nella popolazione gay e lesbica italiana: il ruolo dell'omonegatività interiorizzata [Minority stress in the Italian gay and lesbian population: The role of internalized homonegativity]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italia.
– reference: Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221-233.
– reference: Whisman, M. A., Snyder, D. K., & Beach, S. R. H. (2009). Screening for marital and relationship discord. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 247-254.
– reference: Peplau, L. A., & Fingerhut, A. W. (2007). The close relationships of lesbians and gay men. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 405-424.
– reference: Platero, R. (2007). Love and the state: Gay marriage in Spain. Feminist Legal Studies, 15, 329-340.
– reference: Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
– reference: Balderrama-Durbin, C., Snyder, D. K., & Semmar, Y. (2011). Assessing Arabic couples: An evidence-based approach. Family Science, 2, 24-33.
– reference: Peplau, L. A., & Cochran, S. D. (1981). Value orientations in the intimate relationships of gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 6, 1-19.
– reference: Whisman, M. A. (2013). Relationship adjustment and the prevalence, incidence, and treatment of psychopathology. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 163-170.
– volume: 3
  start-page: 424
  year: 1998
  end-page: 453
  article-title: Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification
  publication-title: Psychological Methods
– start-page: 439
  year: 2008
  end-page: 463
– year: 1983
– year: 2009
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1
  year: 1981
  end-page: 19
  article-title: Value orientations in the intimate relationships of gay men
  publication-title: Journal of Homosexuality
– volume: 30
  start-page: 163
  year: 2013
  end-page: 170
  article-title: Relationship adjustment and the prevalence, incidence, and treatment of psychopathology
  publication-title: Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
– volume: 88
  start-page: 588
  year: 1980
  end-page: 606
  article-title: Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structure
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– start-page: 225
  year: 2006
  end-page: 238
– volume: 50
  start-page: 353
  year: 2011
  end-page: 376
  article-title: Heterosexual, lesbian, and gay male relationships: A comparison of couples in 1975 and 2000
  publication-title: Family Process
– volume: 63
  start-page: 221
  year: 1992
  end-page: 233
  article-title: Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health
  publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
– year: 2007
– volume: 45
  start-page: 23
  year: 2003a
  end-page: 43
  article-title: Correlates of gay and lesbian couples’ relationship satisfaction and relationship dissolution
  publication-title: Journal of Homosexuality
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1019
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1029
  article-title: Internalized homophobia and internalizing mental health problems: A meta‐analytic review
  publication-title: Clinical Psychology Review
– volume: 24
  start-page: 82
  year: 2010
  end-page: 86
  article-title: Psychological distress, well‐being, and legal recognition in same‐sex couple relationships
  publication-title: Journal of Family Psychology
– volume: 29
  start-page: 69
  year: 2003
  end-page: 83
  article-title: Assessing nontraditional couples: Validity of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory‐Revised (MSI‐R) with gay, lesbian, and cohabiting heterosexual couples
  publication-title: Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
– year: 2003
– volume: 16
  start-page: 277
  year: 2010
  article-title: Behavioural and cognitive aspects of Italian male same‐sex couples: A qualitative research
  publication-title: Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale
– volume: 127
  start-page: 472
  year: 2001
  end-page: 503
  article-title: Marriage and health: His and hers
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 2
  start-page: 24
  year: 2011
  end-page: 33
  article-title: Assessing Arabic couples: An evidence‐based approach
  publication-title: Family Science
– year: 2010
– year: 2012
– volume: 47
  start-page: 1
  year: 2006
  end-page: 16
  article-title: You make me sick: Marital quality and health over the life course
  publication-title: Journal of Health and Social Behavior
– start-page: 135
  year: 2013
  end-page: 146
– start-page: 349
  year: 2004
  end-page: 369
– volume: 14
  start-page: 251
  year: 2005
  end-page: 254
  article-title: What do we know about gay and lesbian couples?
  publication-title: Current Directions in Psychological Science
– volume: 57
  start-page: 317
  year: 2006
  end-page: 344
  article-title: Current status and future directions in couple therapy
  publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology
– volume: 129
  start-page: 674
  year: 2003
  end-page: 697
  article-title: Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 23
  start-page: 247
  year: 2009
  end-page: 254
  article-title: Screening for marital and relationship discord
  publication-title: Journal of Family Psychology
– start-page: 603
  year: 2004
  end-page: 623
– year: 1997
– volume: 60
  start-page: 553
  year: 1998
  end-page: 568
  article-title: Relationship outcomes and their predictors: Longitudinal evidence from heterosexual married, gay cohabiting, and lesbian cohabiting couples
  publication-title: Journal of Marriage and Family
– volume: 58
  start-page: 405
  year: 2007
  end-page: 424
  article-title: The close relationships of lesbians and gay men
  publication-title: Annual Review of Psychology
– volume: 45
  start-page: 65
  year: 2003b
  end-page: 91
  article-title: Observing gay, lesbian and heterosexual couples’ relationships: Mathematical modeling of conflict interaction
  publication-title: Journal of Homosexuality
– volume: 20
  start-page: 5
  year: 2013
  end-page: 23
  article-title: La coppia omosessuale oggi [The homosexual couple today]
  publication-title: Rivista di Sessuologia Clinica
– volume: 62
  start-page: 964
  year: 2000
  end-page: 980
  article-title: Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade review
  publication-title: Journal of Marriage and the Family
– volume: 17
  start-page: 419
  year: 2003
  end-page: 428
  article-title: Conflict, social support, and relationship quality: An observational study of heterosexual, gay male, and lesbian couples’ communication
  publication-title: Journal of Family Psychology
– volume: 52
  start-page: 561
  year: 2005
  end-page: 575
  article-title: Money, housework, sex, and conflict: Same‐sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings
  publication-title: Sex Roles
– volume: 107
  start-page: 238
  year: 1990
  end-page: 246
  article-title: Comparative fit indices in structural models
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– year: 1993
– volume: 15
  start-page: 329
  year: 2007
  end-page: 340
  article-title: Love and the state: Gay marriage in Spain
  publication-title: Feminist Legal Studies
– volume: 25
  start-page: 173
  year: 1990
  end-page: 180
  article-title: Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
  publication-title: Multivariate Behavioral Research
– start-page: 662
  year: 2008
  end-page: 680
– ident: e_1_2_5_7_1
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
– ident: e_1_2_5_26_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb00384.x
– ident: e_1_2_5_17_1
  doi: 10.1300/J082v45n01_04
– ident: e_1_2_5_44_1
  doi: 10.1037/a0014476
– ident: e_1_2_5_41_1
  doi: 10.1177/002214650604700101
– ident: e_1_2_5_22_1
  doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.17.3.419
– ident: e_1_2_5_40_1
  doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
– ident: e_1_2_5_8_1
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
– ident: e_1_2_5_16_1
  doi: 10.1300/J082v45n01_02
– volume-title: Testing structural equation models
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_5_10_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_15_1
  doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.221
– ident: e_1_2_5_20_1
  doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
– volume-title: American couples: Money, work, sex
  year: 1983
  ident: e_1_2_5_9_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_30_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085701
– volume-title: Cross‐national approaches to evidence‐based couple assessment
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_5_13_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_32_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10691-007-9064-z
– ident: e_1_2_5_25_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00375.x
– volume-title: Manual for the marital satisfaction inventory–revised
  year: 1997
  ident: e_1_2_5_35_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_3_1
  doi: 10.3280/RSC2013-001001
– ident: e_1_2_5_33_1
  doi: 10.1037/a0017942
– ident: e_1_2_5_38_1
  doi: 10.1093/med:psych/9780195310641.003.0020
– ident: e_1_2_5_28_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.003
– ident: e_1_2_5_23_1
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.472
– ident: e_1_2_5_36_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070154
– ident: e_1_2_5_14_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01365.x
– ident: e_1_2_5_24_1
  doi: 10.2307/353528
– start-page: 135
  volume-title: Crescere nelle famiglie omosessuali. Un approccio psicologico [Growing up in homosexual families. A psychological approach]
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_5_12_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_29_1
  doi: 10.1300/J082v06n03_01
– start-page: 603
  volume-title: Use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_5_37_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_39_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-3725-7
– ident: e_1_2_5_43_1
  doi: 10.1177/0265407512455269
– volume-title: Married‐couple and unmarried partner households: 2000
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_5_34_1
– volume-title: Anno 2011. La popolazione omosessuale nella società italiana
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_5_21_1
– volume-title: Omosessuali moderni. Gay e lesbiche in Italia [Modern homosexuals. Gay men and lesbians in Italy]
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_5_6_1
– volume: 16
  start-page: 277
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_5_4_1
  article-title: Behavioural and cognitive aspects of Italian male same‐sex couples: A qualitative research
  publication-title: Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale
– ident: e_1_2_5_27_1
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
– start-page: 225
  volume-title: Relational processes and DSM‐V: Neuroscience, assessment, prevention, and treatment
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_5_42_1
  doi: 10.1176/appi.books.9781615377695.lg14
– ident: e_1_2_5_11_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x
– start-page: 349
  volume-title: The handbook of sexuality in close relationships
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_5_31_1
– volume-title: Psicoterapia e omosessualità [Psychotherapy and homosexuality]
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_5_18_1
– ident: e_1_2_5_5_1
  doi: 10.1080/19424620.2011.600586
– start-page: 662
  volume-title: Clinical handbook of couple therapy
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_5_19_1
– volume-title: Il minority stress nella popolazione gay e lesbica italiana: il ruolo dell'omonegatività interiorizzata [Minority stress in the Italian gay and lesbian population: The role of internalized homonegativity]
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_5_2_1
SSID ssj0004987
Score 2.1238582
Snippet Assessing couple relationships across diverse languages and cultures has important implications for both clinical intervention and prevention. This is...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 702
SubjectTerms Assessment
Biological and medical sciences
Couple and family
Couples
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Crosscultural Differences
evaluación
Female
funcionamiento de la relación
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gay and Lesbian Couples
Gays & lesbians
Heterosexuality
Heterosexuality - psychology
Homosexuality
Homosexuality, Female - psychology
Homosexuality, Male - psychology
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Intervention
Italian Marriage
Italy
Language
Lesbianism
Male
Marital Satisfaction
Marriage
matrimonio italiano
parejas de homosexuales y lesbianas
parejas del mismo sexo
Personal Satisfaction
Prevention
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Relationship Functioning
Same-Sex Couples
satisfacción marital
Sexual Partners - psychology
Single Person - psychology
Social psychology
Translations
United States
United States of America
关系功能
同性伴侣
婚姻满意度
意大利婚姻
男同和女同伴侣
评估
Title Gay and Lesbian Couples in Italy: Comparisons with Heterosexual Couples
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-L110DBZ6-6/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Ffamp.12078
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24867576
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1629812531
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1634275582
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1667950829
Volume 53
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3raxQxEB9q-6Vfqp6vtfWIKIrCHpvHPiJ-uYd3p1yLiMUiyJLsJiBt947uHXr-9SbZx3lSCvptYSeQTGYmv9nM_gbgueQCYy1yX0jFfaal9jnDwg9EHHIupVSuf8rxSTQ9ZR_OwrMdeNv8C1PxQ7Qf3KxnuHhtHVzI8g8n1-Jy0cPEHHEmAGMaWeL80acNdxTjSUWYiZkf0ziouUltGc9m6NZptGcV-9NWR4rSKEhXnS2ug57bSNYdRePb8K1ZRFWBct5bLWUv-_UXv-P_rvIOHNQYFfUro7oLO6rowK2Z-NGB_TZgrjtw4NpfvixRXYx4DyYTsUaiyNHM3juJAg3nq8WFKtH3Ar03MH_9Bg3bxoclsh-B0dQW5MxLR_3cyN-H0_G7z8OpX7dq8LMwYolvUE8eZgJrzhhXmUFViZIiykkmDb7UOpBUUEKZSjJKWR6InJo8LMQyiE1qT3L6AHaLeaEeAdIRySXXmAuT6hjAIm2GqkxWGCgS5zTz4FWzZWlW85jbdhoXaZPPWJ2lTmcePGtlFxV7x7VSL9zOtyLi6tzWu8Vh-uVkks7MBEaDr1EaedDdMo12AOGWFYkagaPGVtI6FpQpjgg3MMoEOw-etq-NF9urGVGo-crKUEbiMEzITTJRbHv2Eu7Bw8oONxOwxIkmdfTgtbOmG1abjvvHH93T438RPoR9Yl3JVfIcwe7yaqWeGDy2lF3Y6w9Gg3HX-d9vdz4vjg
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwED-x7YG9DChfgTGMQCCQUiW282HeRkfbQVshtImJF8tOHAltpNXSCspfj89JU4qmSfAWKWfJOd-df2dffgfwQgsVhoXKfaWN8HmhC1_wUPmBSiIhtNbG9U8ZT-LhKf9wFp01tTn4L0zND9EeuKFnuHiNDo4H0n94eaG-z7ohtXvcFuxwizQw9zr6vGaP4iKtKTND7icsCRp2UizkWY_d2I92ULU_sT5SVVZFRd3b4irwuYll3WbUv1V3XK0chyHWoJx3F3PdzX79xfD43995G_YamEoOa7u6AzdM2YGtkfrRgd02Zi47sOc6YL6qSFOPeBcGA7UkqszJCK-eVEl608XswlTkW0mOLdJfviW9tvdhRfAcmAyxJmdaOfbnlfw9OO2_P-kN_aZbg59FMU99C3zyKFNhITgXJrPAKjVaxTnNtIWYRRFophhl3KQZYzwPVM5sKhaFOkhsdk9zdh-2y2lpHgIpYpprUYRC2WzHYhaNSaqxiWFgaJKzzIPXqzWTWUNljh01LuQqpUGdSaczD563srOawONKqZdu6VsRdXmOJW9JJL9MBnJkJ3D07mssYw8ONmyjHUAFEiMxK7C_MhbZhINKhjEVFknZeOfBs_a1dWS8nVGlmS5QhnGaRFFKr5OJE2zbS4UHD2pDXE8AuRNt9ujBG2dO13yt7B-OP7mnR_8i_BRuDk_GIzk6nnx8DLsU_coV9uzD9vxyYZ5YeDbXB84JfwPZoDI7
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3raxQxEB_6AOmXquejq7VGFEVhj90k-4j4pV69u-r1KGJpEWRJNgmU1r2je4eef71J9nGelIJ-W9gJJJOZyW82s78BeCEYD0PNpc-FYj7VQvuMhtwPeBIxJoRQrn_K0TgentCPZ9HZGrxr_oWp-CHaD27WM1y8tg4-lfoPJ9f8-7QbYnPErcMmjQ2UsJDo85I8irK0YswMqZ-QJKjJSW0dz3LsynG0aTX705ZH8tJoSFetLa7DnqtQ1p1F_dvwrVlFVYJy0Z3PRDf_9RfB4_8u8w5s1yAV7VdWdRfWVNGB9RH_0YGtNmIuOrDt-l--KlFdjXgPBgO-QLyQaGQvnniBepP59FKV6LxAhwbnL96iXtv5sET2KzAa2oqcSem4nxv5-3DS__ClN_TrXg1-HsU09Q3skVHOQ80oZSo3sCpVgscS58IATK0DQTjBhKo0J4TKgEtiErEoFEFicnssyQPYKCaF2gGkYywF0yHjJtcxiEXYFFWZtDBQOJEk9-B1s2VZXhOZ234al1mT0FidZU5nHjxvZacVfce1Ui_dzrci_OrCFrwlUXY6HmQjM4GD91_jLPZgb8U02gGYWVokYgR2G1vJ6mBQZmGMmcFRJtp58Kx9bdzY3s3wQk3mVoZQnERRim-SiRPbtBczDx5WdricgGVONLmjB2-cNd2w2qy_f3Tsnh79i_BTuHV80M9Gh-NPj2ELW69yVT27sDG7mqsnBpvNxJ5zwd8XPjDq
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gay+and+Lesbian+Couples+in+Italy%3A+Comparisons+with+Heterosexual+Couples&rft.jtitle=Family+process&rft.au=ANTONELLI%2C+Paolo&rft.au=DETTORE%2C+Davide&rft.au=LASAGNI%2C+Irene&rft.au=SNYDER%2C+Douglas+K&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.pub=Wiley&rft.issn=0014-7370&rft.eissn=1545-5300&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=702&rft.epage=716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Ffamp.12078&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=29077636
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0014-7370&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0014-7370&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0014-7370&client=summon