Habitat type and host grazing regimen influence the soil microbial diversity and communities within potential biting midge larval habitats

• Published in: Environmental microbiome Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 5
• Main Authors: Neupane, Saraswoti, Davis, Travis, Nayduch, Dana, McGregor, Bethany L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 19.01.2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Acidobacteria; Actinobacteria; Apicomplexa; Bacteria; Bacteroidetes; Biting; Buffalo; Chironomidae; Chloroflexi; Dairy cattle; Domestic animals; Firmicutes; Fungi; Genetic testing; Grazing; Habitat utilization; Habitats; Laboratories; Metazoa; Microbial activity; Nematoda; Nematodes; Organic matter; Plastics; Potential midge larval habitat; Proteobacteria; Protists; Relative abundance; rRNA gene; Soil; Soil microbiology; Soil microorganisms; Soil properties; Species richness; Vectors; United States > US; Kansas; Fungi; Protists; Diversity; Soil; Bacteria; Metazoa community; Potential midge larval habitat; rRNA gene
• DOI: 10.1186/s40793-022-00456-8
• ISSN: 2524-6372

Biting midges (Culicoides spp.) are important vectors of diverse microbes such as viruses, protozoa, and nematodes that cause diseases in wild and domestic animals. However, little is known about the role of microbial communities in midge larval habitat utilization in the wild. In this study, we characterized microbial communities (bacterial, protistan, fungal and metazoan) in soils from disturbed (bison and cattle grazed) and undisturbed (non-grazed) pond and spring potential midge larval habitats. We evaluated the influence of habitat and grazing disturbance and their interaction on microbial communities, diversity, presence of midges, and soil properties. Bacterial, protistan, fungal and metazoan community compositions were significantly influenced by habitat and grazing type. Irrespective of habitat and grazing type, soil communities were dominated by phyla Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria (Bacteria); Apicomplexa, Cercozoa, Ciliophora, Ochrophyta (Protists); Chytridiomycota, Cryptomycota (Fungi) and Nematoda, Arthropoda (Metazoa). The relative abundance of Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia (Bacteria); Apicomplexa, Lobosa (Protists); Ascomycota, Blastomycotina, Cryptomycota (Fungi); and Platyhelminthes (Metazoa) were significantly affected by grazing type. Of note, midge prevalence was higher in grazed sites (67-100%) than non-grazed (25%). Presence of midges in the soil was negatively correlated with bacterial, protistan, fungal and metazoan beta diversities and metazoan species richness but positively correlated with protistan and fungal species richness. Moreover, total carbon (TC), nitrogen (TN) and organic matter (OM) were negatively correlated with the presence of midges and relative abundances of unclassified Solirubrobacterales (Bacteria) and Chlamydomonadales (Protists) but positively with Proteobacteria and unclassified Burkholderiales (Bacteria). Habitat and grazing type shaped the soil bacterial, protistan, fungal and metazoan communities, their compositions and diversities, as well as presence of midges. Soil properties (TN, TC, OM) also influenced soil microbial communities, diversities and the presence of midges. Prevalence of midges mainly in grazed sites indicates that midges prefer to breed and shelter in a habitat with abundant hosts, probably due to greater accessibility of food (blood meals). These results provide a first glimpse into the microbial communities, soil properties and prevalence of midges in suspected midge larval habitats at a protected natural prairie site.