A meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting stents versus sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients
We performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (PES) should be preferred for the treatment of DM patients. A systematic search of publications about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focus...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cardiothoracic surgery Vol. 16; no. 1; p. 90 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
17.04.2021
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | We performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (PES) should be preferred for the treatment of DM patients.
A systematic search of publications about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on diabetic patients received EES, SES or PES was conducted. We evaluated the following indicators: target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), late luminal loss (LLL), stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality.
EES showed obvious advantages over SES for DM patients, as it induced the lowest rate of target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (p = 0.04). In addition, EES induced lower in-segment LLL than PSE and SES and lower in-stent LLL than PES in DM patients (all p < 0.05). Moreover, EES effectively reduced all-cause mortality compared to SES (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.99, p = 0.04) and MI rates compared to PES (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.73, p = 0.0002). Furthermore, EES could reduce the ST rate compared with both SES (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.28-0.98, p = 0.04) and PES (RR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07-0.51, p = 0.001).
Among those three types of stents, EES should be the first recommended stent for DM patients. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract
Objective
We performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (PES) should be preferred for the treatment of DM patients.
Methods
A systematic search of publications about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on diabetic patients received EES, SES or PES was conducted. We evaluated the following indicators: target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), late luminal loss (LLL), stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality.
Results
EES showed obvious advantages over SES for DM patients, as it induced the lowest rate of target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (
p
= 0.04). In addition, EES induced lower in-segment LLL than PSE and SES and lower in-stent LLL than PES in DM patients (all
p
< 0.05). Moreover, EES effectively reduced all-cause mortality compared to SES (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52–0.99,
p
= 0.04) and MI rates compared to PES (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26–0.73,
p
= 0.0002). Furthermore, EES could reduce the ST rate compared with both SES (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.28–0.98,
p
= 0.04) and PES (RR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07–0.51,
p
= 0.001).
Conclusion
Among those three types of stents, EES should be the first recommended stent for DM patients. Abstract Objective We performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (PES) should be preferred for the treatment of DM patients. Methods A systematic search of publications about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on diabetic patients received EES, SES or PES was conducted. We evaluated the following indicators: target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), late luminal loss (LLL), stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. Results EES showed obvious advantages over SES for DM patients, as it induced the lowest rate of target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (p = 0.04). In addition, EES induced lower in-segment LLL than PSE and SES and lower in-stent LLL than PES in DM patients (all p < 0.05). Moreover, EES effectively reduced all-cause mortality compared to SES (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52–0.99, p = 0.04) and MI rates compared to PES (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26–0.73, p = 0.0002). Furthermore, EES could reduce the ST rate compared with both SES (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.28–0.98, p = 0.04) and PES (RR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07–0.51, p = 0.001). Conclusion Among those three types of stents, EES should be the first recommended stent for DM patients. Objective We performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (PES) should be preferred for the treatment of DM patients. Methods A systematic search of publications about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on diabetic patients received EES, SES or PES was conducted. We evaluated the following indicators: target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), late luminal loss (LLL), stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. Results EES showed obvious advantages over SES for DM patients, as it induced the lowest rate of target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (p = 0.04). In addition, EES induced lower in-segment LLL than PSE and SES and lower in-stent LLL than PES in DM patients (all p < 0.05). Moreover, EES effectively reduced all-cause mortality compared to SES (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.99, p = 0.04) and MI rates compared to PES (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.73, p = 0.0002). Furthermore, EES could reduce the ST rate compared with both SES (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.28-0.98, p = 0.04) and PES (RR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07-0.51, p = 0.001). Conclusion Among those three types of stents, EES should be the first recommended stent for DM patients. Keywords: Sirolimus-eluting stents, Paclitaxel-eluting stents, Everolimus-eluting stent, Diabetes, Meta-analysis We performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (PES) should be preferred for the treatment of DM patients. A systematic search of publications about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on diabetic patients received EES, SES or PES was conducted. We evaluated the following indicators: target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), late luminal loss (LLL), stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. EES showed obvious advantages over SES for DM patients, as it induced the lowest rate of target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (p = 0.04). In addition, EES induced lower in-segment LLL than PSE and SES and lower in-stent LLL than PES in DM patients (all p < 0.05). Moreover, EES effectively reduced all-cause mortality compared to SES (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.99, p = 0.04) and MI rates compared to PES (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.73, p = 0.0002). Furthermore, EES could reduce the ST rate compared with both SES (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.28-0.98, p = 0.04) and PES (RR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07-0.51, p = 0.001). Among those three types of stents, EES should be the first recommended stent for DM patients. Objective We performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (PES) should be preferred for the treatment of DM patients. Methods A systematic search of publications about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on diabetic patients received EES, SES or PES was conducted. We evaluated the following indicators: target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), late luminal loss (LLL), stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. Results EES showed obvious advantages over SES for DM patients, as it induced the lowest rate of target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (p = 0.04). In addition, EES induced lower in-segment LLL than PSE and SES and lower in-stent LLL than PES in DM patients (all p < 0.05). Moreover, EES effectively reduced all-cause mortality compared to SES (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52–0.99, p = 0.04) and MI rates compared to PES (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26–0.73, p = 0.0002). Furthermore, EES could reduce the ST rate compared with both SES (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.28–0.98, p = 0.04) and PES (RR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07–0.51, p = 0.001). Conclusion Among those three types of stents, EES should be the first recommended stent for DM patients. We performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (PES) should be preferred for the treatment of DM patients. A systematic search of publications about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on diabetic patients received EES, SES or PES was conducted. We evaluated the following indicators: target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), late luminal loss (LLL), stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. EES showed obvious advantages over SES for DM patients, as it induced the lowest rate of target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (p = 0.04). In addition, EES induced lower in-segment LLL than PSE and SES and lower in-stent LLL than PES in DM patients (all p < 0.05). Moreover, EES effectively reduced all-cause mortality compared to SES (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.99, p = 0.04) and MI rates compared to PES (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.73, p = 0.0002). Furthermore, EES could reduce the ST rate compared with both SES (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.28-0.98, p = 0.04) and PES (RR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07-0.51, p = 0.001). Among those three types of stents, EES should be the first recommended stent for DM patients. OBJECTIVEWe performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting stents (PES) should be preferred for the treatment of DM patients. METHODSA systematic search of publications about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on diabetic patients received EES, SES or PES was conducted. We evaluated the following indicators: target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), late luminal loss (LLL), stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. RESULTSEES showed obvious advantages over SES for DM patients, as it induced the lowest rate of target vessel revascularization and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (p = 0.04). In addition, EES induced lower in-segment LLL than PSE and SES and lower in-stent LLL than PES in DM patients (all p < 0.05). Moreover, EES effectively reduced all-cause mortality compared to SES (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.99, p = 0.04) and MI rates compared to PES (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.73, p = 0.0002). Furthermore, EES could reduce the ST rate compared with both SES (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.28-0.98, p = 0.04) and PES (RR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07-0.51, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONAmong those three types of stents, EES should be the first recommended stent for DM patients. |
ArticleNumber | 90 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Xie, Siya Tao, Zheng Ouyang, Hang Zeng, Xuehui Hou, Zhihui Zhang, Chunlei Song, Linli Xu, Jiarui He, Jincai |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hang surname: Ouyang fullname: Ouyang, Hang organization: Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 1 Fuhua Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518033, People's Republic of China – sequence: 2 givenname: Xuehui surname: Zeng fullname: Zeng, Xuehui organization: Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 1 Fuhua Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518033, People's Republic of China – sequence: 3 givenname: Chunlei surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Chunlei organization: Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 1 Fuhua Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518033, People's Republic of China – sequence: 4 givenname: Linli surname: Song fullname: Song, Linli organization: Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 1 Fuhua Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518033, People's Republic of China – sequence: 5 givenname: Jiarui surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Jiarui organization: Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 1 Fuhua Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518033, People's Republic of China – sequence: 6 givenname: Zhihui surname: Hou fullname: Hou, Zhihui organization: Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 1 Fuhua Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518033, People's Republic of China – sequence: 7 givenname: Siya surname: Xie fullname: Xie, Siya organization: Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 1 Fuhua Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518033, People's Republic of China – sequence: 8 givenname: Zheng surname: Tao fullname: Tao, Zheng email: taozheng67@foxmail.com organization: Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, 438 Jiefang Road, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, 212001, People's Republic of China. taozheng67@foxmail.com – sequence: 9 givenname: Jincai surname: He fullname: He, Jincai email: sztcmhjc@163.com organization: Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 1 Fuhua Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518033, People's Republic of China. sztcmhjc@163.com |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33865413$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1Uk1rFDEYDlKxH_oHPMiAFy9T8zmTXISlaC0UvOg55GvWLJlkTWaKPfnXzey2ZbcoOSS8z8ebN3nOwUlM0QHwFsFLhHj3sSACkWghRi1ElOGWvwBnqKei5VDAk4PzKTgvZQMhZQSyV-CUEN4xisgZ-LNqRjepVkUV7osvTRoad-dyCn6cS-vCPPm4bsrk4lSaCpS5NMX_B1fRNltlgp_Ubxeeoz421ivtJm8qa_JL8TV4OahQ3JuH_QL8-PL5-9XX9vbb9c3V6rY1rCNTayGjjlUtHphliGuBFaFGC804QYZb0XEDdT9AqxhW2lICnXGQk0WpBLkAN3tfm9RGbrMfVb6XSXm5K6S8lirXiwUne64RFpQ6ai0d-l5j2mtGteEIU8EWr097r-2sR2dNnSOrcGR6jET_U67TneSQ4Z7TavDhwSCnX7Mrkxx9MS4EFV2ai8QMMdgxxmClvn9G3aQ518_asSgWguED1lrVAXwcUu1rFlO56jpEUW27sC7_warLutGbmq3B1_qRAO8FJqdSshueZkRQLhGU-wjKGkG5i6DkVfTu8HWeJI-ZI38B3fnaZw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000000736 crossref_primary_10_1089_blr_2022_29259_cmh crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12237367 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.031 10.1002/ccd.25875 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62127-9 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015453 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.05.038 10.4244/eij-d-17-00333 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.829176 10.1007/s11886-017-0837-y 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00732-4 10.1002/9780470712184 10.1001/jama.299.16.1903 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn434 10.1136/hrt.2005.075960 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.016 10.1056/NEJMoa044372 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14462-5 10.1161/01.CIR.0000153356.72810.97 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn021 10.1002/ccd.24741 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.034 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002319 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.116 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.045 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.02.006 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.084 10.1056/NEJMoa051175 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.022 10.1007/s00395-011-0177-9 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.006 10.1136/bmj.e5170 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2021 |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FD 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P M7Z P64 PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s13019-021-01452-8 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Biochemistry Abstracts 1 Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Technology Research Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Biochemistry Abstracts 1 Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1749-8090 |
EndPage | 90 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_78b12944e4dd4f77b247b54bc8124959 A661412780 10_1186_s13019_021_01452_8 33865413 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Shenzhen Science and Technology Project grantid: JCYJ20170307155244629 – fundername: Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Bureau Project grantid: 20182125 – fundername: ; grantid: JCYJ20170307155244629 – fundername: ; grantid: 20182125 |
GroupedDBID | --- -5E -5G -A0 -BR 0R~ 29K 2WC 3V. 53G 5GY 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACRMQ ADBBV ADINQ ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C24 C6C CCPQU CS3 D-I DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E NPM O5R O5S OK1 P2P P6G PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW ~8M AAYXX CITATION ABVAZ AFGXO AFNRJ 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC DWQXO FR3 K9. M7Z P64 PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-d054e5abe2f5d518b92a34cb9b5831c8d968c0b7f0da52abd430ece083d054a93 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 1749-8090 |
IngestDate | Sun Sep 29 07:14:44 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:06:31 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 16 05:48:35 EDT 2024 Fri Sep 13 10:14:14 EDT 2024 Thu Feb 22 23:27:32 EST 2024 Fri Feb 02 04:31:58 EST 2024 Thu Sep 12 19:52:32 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:27:48 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Diabetes Paclitaxel-eluting stents Everolimus-eluting stent Sirolimus-eluting stents Meta-analysis |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c563t-d054e5abe2f5d518b92a34cb9b5831c8d968c0b7f0da52abd430ece083d054a93 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8052784/ |
PMID | 33865413 |
PQID | 2514299520 |
PQPubID | 55047 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_78b12944e4dd4f77b247b54bc8124959 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8052784 proquest_miscellaneous_2515065550 proquest_journals_2514299520 gale_infotracmisc_A661412780 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A661412780 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13019_021_01452_8 pubmed_primary_33865413 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-04-17 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-04-17 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2021 text: 2021-04-17 day: 17 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Journal of cardiothoracic surgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Cardiothorac Surg |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | 1452_CR10 1452_CR11 PW Serruys (1452_CR17) 2006; 2 P Codner (1452_CR1) 2017; 19 1452_CR30 1452_CR9 1452_CR8 KE Kip (1452_CR31) 2008; 51 1452_CR6 1452_CR18 E Di Lorenzo (1452_CR16) 2014; 7 1452_CR5 1452_CR14 1452_CR4 1452_CR13 1452_CR3 1452_CR2 1452_CR15 1452_CR21 1452_CR20 1452_CR23 1452_CR22 E Grube (1452_CR7) 2012; 163 T Hammoud (1452_CR19) 2000; 36 WJ Kim (1452_CR12) 2011; 124 1452_CR29 1452_CR28 1452_CR25 1452_CR24 1452_CR27 1452_CR26 |
References_xml | – ident: 1452_CR6 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.031 – ident: 1452_CR14 doi: 10.1002/ccd.25875 – ident: 1452_CR5 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62127-9 – volume: 124 start-page: 886 year: 2011 ident: 1452_CR12 publication-title: Circulation doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015453 contributor: fullname: WJ Kim – ident: 1452_CR3 doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.05.038 – ident: 1452_CR15 doi: 10.4244/eij-d-17-00333 – ident: 1452_CR4 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.829176 – volume: 19 start-page: 28 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 1452_CR1 publication-title: Curr Cardiol Rep doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0837-y contributor: fullname: P Codner – volume: 36 start-page: 355 issue: 2 year: 2000 ident: 1452_CR19 publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00732-4 contributor: fullname: T Hammoud – ident: 1452_CR8 doi: 10.1002/9780470712184 – ident: 1452_CR18 doi: 10.1001/jama.299.16.1903 – ident: 1452_CR20 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn434 – ident: 1452_CR2 doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.075960 – volume: 7 start-page: 849 issue: 8 year: 2014 ident: 1452_CR16 publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Interv doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.016 contributor: fullname: E Di Lorenzo – ident: 1452_CR21 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044372 – ident: 1452_CR27 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14462-5 – ident: 1452_CR28 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000153356.72810.97 – ident: 1452_CR22 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn021 – ident: 1452_CR13 doi: 10.1002/ccd.24741 – volume: 51 start-page: 701 issue: 7 year: 2008 ident: 1452_CR31 publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.034 contributor: fullname: KE Kip – ident: 1452_CR10 doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002319 – volume: 2 start-page: 286 year: 2006 ident: 1452_CR17 publication-title: EuroIntervention contributor: fullname: PW Serruys – ident: 1452_CR30 doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.116 – ident: 1452_CR26 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.045 – volume: 163 start-page: 867 year: 2012 ident: 1452_CR7 publication-title: Am Heart J doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.02.006 contributor: fullname: E Grube – ident: 1452_CR29 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.084 – ident: 1452_CR25 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051175 – ident: 1452_CR11 doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.022 – ident: 1452_CR23 doi: 10.1007/s00395-011-0177-9 – ident: 1452_CR9 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.006 – ident: 1452_CR24 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5170 |
SSID | ssj0045305 |
Score | 2.2823355 |
Snippet | We performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting stents... Abstract Objective We performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and... Objective We performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting... OBJECTIVEWe performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel eluting... Abstract Objective We performed this meta-analysis to determine which stent among everolimus eluting stents (EES), sirolimus eluting stents (SES) and... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 90 |
SubjectTerms | Blood clot Care and treatment Clinical trials Diabetes Diabetes mellitus Diabetics Everolimus-eluting stent Health aspects Heart attack Heart attacks Implants Lesions Meta-analysis Mortality Myocardial infarction Paclitaxel Paclitaxel-eluting stents Rapamycin Sensitivity analysis Sirolimus-eluting stents Stent (Surgery) Stents Thromboembolism Thrombosis |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9UwEA-yJy-i-FVdJYLgQcK2ab56fIrLIujJhb2FfFULu31i-2Bv_uvOJH2PV0W8eCp0JpBmfvNVMjOEvJatUuC2Emt47ZkQUTKfkme88-AtQ6-cxkLhT5_VxaX4eCWvjkZ94Z2w0h64HNyZNh5ckhBJxCh6rT0X2kvhg8ljk0vpXiP3yVSxwUICjPclMkadTWCpsViHY-osJNiAlRvK3fr_tMlHTml9YfLIA53fJ_eW0JFuypYfkDtpfEh-buhNmh1zS3MRuu1pAnhur4eb3cQSAmv8SkGW4zxRvIOxm-g0_IXuxkghicbG3bfp-nfqMNLyq3YIdOnHOj0il-cfvry_YMtQBRakamcWIUZLEnh5L6NsjO-4a0XwnZembYKJnTKh9rqvo5Pc-SjaOoUEkRqudF37mJyM2zE9JdR0RgVVR8ivvUhBdrXTBp5N7XwLhrQib_dnbL-X3hk25xxG2SIRCxKxWSIWuN-hGA6c2Pc6vwA02AUN9l9oqMgbFKJF7QRJBbcUGcCGsc-V3WA40nBt6oqcrjhBq8KavIeBXbR6shALovuWHMivDmRciTfVxrTdZR4JYR0kfhV5UlBz-KQWB6xC1FARvcLT6pvXlHH4lnt-4-QJbcSz_3FIz8ldnlVBsEafkpP5xy69gNBq9i-zFv0C1KoiFw priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Na9VAEF9qe_Eiil-pVVYQPMjyks1udnOSV2l5CBYRC70t-5UaaJPa5IE3_3Vn8vFsFD0FMhNIMr_52t2ZIeSNzIsC3FZkGU8dEyJI5mJ0jJcOvKWvCquwUPjTWbE5Fx8v5MUe2cy1MHiscraJg6EOrcc18hX4YTSdkqcr63AVwPer9zffGc6Pwn3WaZjGPXLAM4EbtgfHJ2efv8xWWUgA9lw0o4tVB7Yby3c4JtNCglVYOKahf__fVvqOm1oeobzjk04fkgdTMEnXo_Qfkb3YPCY_1_Q69pbZqd0IbSsaAbDtVX297VhEqDWXFKTb9B3FUxnbjnb1P-i2CRTSamzl_SNe_UmtGzou3taeTh1auyfk_PTk64cNm8YsMC-LvGcBorYogZdXMshMu5LbXHhXOqnzzOtQFtqnTlVpsJJbF0SeRh8hdsMnbZk_JftN28TnhOpSF75IA2TcTkQvy9QqDdcstS4H05qQd_M_NjdjNw0zZCG6MKNEDEjEDBIxwH2MYthxYifs4UZ7e2kmxTJKOwhZhIgiBFEp5bhQTgrn9TBWu0zIWxSiQX1F1Nip7ABeGDtfmTUGKBlXOk3I0YIT9MwvyTMMzKTnnfmNyoS83pHxSTy71sR2O_BICPQgFUzIsxE1u0_KceQqxBEJUQs8Lb55SWnqb0MXcJxFobQ4_P9rvSD3-QBywTJ1RPb72218CWFU715NGvILsXMflQ priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Open Access Journals dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Ni9UwEA_revEiil_VVSIIHiTapvnqQeQpLouwnnywt5CvroW37fraB-vJf91J2j62unoqdCbQZn6T-U2bzCD0ipdCQNgKpKC5JYx5TmwIltDKQrR0tTAyHhQ-_SpO1uzLGT87QHO7o2kC-xtTu9hPar3dvL368fMDOPz75PBKvOthHY5HcWhMjBkHD7-FblNWsoj4U7b_q8A4gHs-OHPjuEVwSjX8_16pr4Wq5TbKa3Hp-B66OxFKvBoRcB8dhPYB-rXCF2EwxEwlR3BX4wCg7TbNxa4nIcKtPcdg4XbocdyZsetx3_xDblqPIbWO5byvwuZPadPi8QNu4_BUpbV_iNbHn799OiFTqwXiuCgH4oG5BQ66tOaeF8pW1JTM2cpyVRZO-Uool1tZ595waqxnZR5cAP4WR5qqfIQO264NTxBWlRJO5B6ybsuC41VupIJrkRtbwvKaoTfzHOvLsaKGTpmIEnq0iAaL6GQRDdofoxn2mrEadrrRbc_15FxaKgu0hbHAvGe1lJYyaTmzTqXW2lWGXkcj6ogisJQz09EDeOBY_UqvIkkpqFR5ho4WmuBrbimeYaBnqGpgiDGocwril3txHBn3r7Wh2yUdDmQP0sEMPR5Rs3-lMrZdBS6RIbnA0-Kdl5K2-Z4qgcd-FFKxp_9_rGfoDk0gZ6SQR-hw2O7Cc6BSg32R_OM3aModow priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | A meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting stents versus sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33865413 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2514299520/abstract/ https://search.proquest.com/docview/2515065550 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8052784 https://doaj.org/article/78b12944e4dd4f77b247b54bc8124959 |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBZJCiWX0tKX23RRodBDcda2nj46ISEsbAhtA3sTkqxNDbt2iL3QW_96R7K9xC299LKGnRHYnm80M2bmE0KfGOEcwpaL0ywxMaUli41zJs5yA9HSrrkWflB4ec2vbulixVYHiI2zMKFp35rqtN5sT-vqR-itvN_a-dgnNr9ZnnsafiHp_BAdCkLGEr3ffikDBI_TMZLPW9ik_ZxO5qtmysD9j9FT4k-6pCmZBKPA2f_3zvwoNE3bJh_Focvn6NmQQOKiv9EX6MDVL9GvAm9dp2M9UIzgZo0dgLTZVNtdGzsPr_oOg0XrrsW-E2PX4rb6h1zXJYZS2tN3_3SbP6VVjfsPtpXFAytr-wrdXl58P7-Kh6MVYss46eISMjXHQDdbs5Kl0uSZJtSa3DBJUivLnEubGLFOSs0ybUpKEmcd5Gt-pc7Ja3RUN7V7i7DMJbc8KaHKNtRZlidaSLimiTYEttMIfRnfsbrvGTRUqDwkV71xFBhHBeMo0D7zZthrevbr8EfzcKcGDCghDaQplDpalnQthMmoMIwaK8NR2nmEPnsjKu-jYCmrh1EDuGHPdqUKn5SkAKEkQicTTfAtOxWPMFCDb7cKMkIfxFkG4o97sV_p-9Vq1-yCDoPkDsq_CL3pUbN_pBF8ERITPE2eeSoBRwjM3wPw3_33yvfoOAuuQONUnKCj7mHnPkBW1ZkZ-NJKzNCTolh8W8D17OL65ussfKOA3yWVs-BnvwH8milV |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,733,786,790,870,891,2115,12083,21416,24346,27957,27958,31754,31755,33779,33780,43345,43840,53827,53829 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfR1Na9RAdNDtQS-i-BWtOoLgQYbmYyYzOclWWlZtF5EWehvmK3WhTWqzC978676XTNZG0VMg7w3M5H1P3gchb0RRlmC2Asvy1DLOvWA2BMvyyoK1dHVpJBYKHy_LxSn_dCbO4oVbF9MqR53YK2rfOrwj3wM7jKpT5On7q-8Mp0bh39U4QuM22eEFhCozsrN_sPzyddTFXAA7j6UyqtzrQGNj0U6OITQXoAsm5qjv2v-3br5hnKaJkzcs0eF9ci-6kHQ-0PwBuRWah-TnnF6GtWEmNhmhbU0DsGl7sbrcdCwggzXnFGjarDuKuRibjnarf8BN4ykE09jA-0e4-BO6auhwZbtyNPZl7R6R08ODkw8LFocrMCfKYs08-GpBAG5eCy8yZavcFNzZygpVZE75qlQutbJOvRG5sZ4XaXABPDZcaariMZk1bROeEqoqVboy9RBnWx6cqFIjFTyz1NgCFGpC3o3fWF8NPTR0H3uoUg8U0UAR3VNEA_Y-kmGLif2v-xft9bmO4qSlsuCocB6497yW0uZcWsGtU_0w7Sohb5GIGqUUKOVMLDaADWO_Kz1HtyTLpUoTsjvBBOlyU_DIBjpKd6d_82JCXm_BuBIz1prQbnocAe4dBIAJeTJwzfZIBQ5aBe8hIXLCT5MzTyHN6lvf-xsnUEjFn_1_W6_IncXJ8ZE--rj8_JzczXuG5yyTu2S2vt6EF-BIre3LKC2_ANDpHsg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9QwFLagSFUvLGILFDASEgfkmSx24hyHwqgsrXqgUsXF8pYSMZOMmkRCXPjrPDvJaFLEpadI856leN73tuj5M0JvWJKmkLYsieJQEUoNI8paReJcQbbURSozd1D45DQ9PqefL9jFzlVffmhfq3JWrdazqvzhZys3az0f58TmZydHjoY_43S-McX8NroDPhvnY6PeB2HKAMfjGRmezhsI1e60Tux6Z8ogCByg_cTdd0mjZJKSPHP_v_F5J0FNhyd3stHyHvo-7qMfQvk561o107-vUTzeaKP30d2hRsWLXuUBumWrh-jPAq9tK4kcWExwXWALflCvynXXEOsQXF1iAE3VNtgNe3QNbsr_yGVlMHTrjiH8l11dl5YV7r8JlxoPxK_NI3S-_Pjt6JgMtzcQzdKkJQaKQctANy6YYRFXeSwTqlWuGE8izU2ech2qrAiNZLFUhiah1RZKQrdS5sljtFfVlX2KMM95qtPQQCOvqNUsD2XG4RmFUiVg_QC9Gw0oNj1Jh_DNDU9Fb3kBlhfe8gK03zsbbzUdwbb_ob66FMO_LzKuoBKi1FJjaJFlKqaZYlRp7m_rzgP01iFEuDAAMNByOM0AL-wItcTC1T0RGC8M0OFEE9xXT8UjxsQQPhoBRaerE1gM4tdbsVvpRuIqW3deh0H9CB1mgJ70kNxuaUR2gLIJWCd7nkoAgp5cfIDcsxuvfIX2zz4sxddPp1-eo4PYuxwlUXaI9tqrzr6AGq5VL723_gUXYEfz |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+meta-analysis+of+everolimus-eluting+stents+versus+sirolimus-eluting+stents+and+paclitaxel-eluting+stents+in+diabetic+patients&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+cardiothoracic+surgery&rft.au=Ouyang%2C+Hang&rft.au=Zeng%2C+Xuehui&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Chunlei&rft.au=Song%2C+Linli&rft.date=2021-04-17&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1749-8090&rft.volume=16&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13019-021-01452-8 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1749-8090&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1749-8090&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1749-8090&client=summon |