Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol

• Published in: BMC pregnancy and childbirth Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 721 - 9
• Main Authors: Dadashaliha, Masoumeh, Fallah, Somayeh, Mirzadeh, Monirsadat
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central 27.10.2021; BMC
• Subjects: Administration, Intravaginal; Administration, Sublingual; Apgar score; Births; Cervical Ripening - drug effects; Cervix; Cervix Uteri - drug effects; Cesarean section; Clinical trials; Drug dosages; Feces; Female; Heart rate; Humans; Induced labor; Labor induced; Labor, Induced - methods; Midwifery; Misoprostol; Misoprostol - administration & dosage; Oxytocics - administration & dosage; Pregnancy; Questionnaires; Term birth; Uterine Contraction - drug effects; Vagina; Womens health; Iran; Labor induced; Term birth; Misoprostol

This study attempts to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 50μgm intracervical misoprostol in comparison with intravaginal and sublingual for the induction of labor at term pregnant women. This study is designed as a parallel clinical trial study. Three hundred and fifteen term pregnancies requ...