High expression of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with colorectal cancer

To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC. In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of surgical oncology Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 171 - 13
Main Authors Zhang, Yaqin, Zhao, Xiaotong, Deng, Lili, Li, Xueting, Wang, Ganbiao, Li, Yongxing, Chen, Mingwei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 24.10.2019
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC. In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke's and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340-2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8-96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7-89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8-57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2-67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0-69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3-86.8), respectively. Increased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC.
AbstractList To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC. In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke's and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340-2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8-96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7-89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8-57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2-67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0-69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3-86.8), respectively. Increased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC.
To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC.OBJECTIVETo explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC.In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.METHODSIn total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke's and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340-2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8-96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7-89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8-57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2-67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0-69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3-86.8), respectively.RESULTSThe serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke's and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340-2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8-96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7-89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8-57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2-67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0-69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3-86.8), respectively.Increased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC.CONCLUSIONIncreased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC.
Objective To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC. Methods In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke's and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340-2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8-96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7-89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8-57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2-67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0-69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3-86.8), respectively. Conclusion Increased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC. Keywords: Colorectal cancer, FABP4, FABP6, Biomarkers
Abstract Objective To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC. Methods In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke’s and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340–2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8–96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7–89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8–57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2–67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0–69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3–86.8), respectively. Conclusion Increased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC.
To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC. In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke's and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340-2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8-96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7-89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8-57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2-67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0-69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3-86.8), respectively. Increased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC.
ArticleNumber 171
Audience Academic
Author Li, Yongxing
Chen, Mingwei
Deng, Lili
Zhao, Xiaotong
Li, Xueting
Zhang, Yaqin
Wang, Ganbiao
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yaqin
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Yaqin
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Xiaotong
  surname: Zhao
  fullname: Zhao, Xiaotong
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Lili
  surname: Deng
  fullname: Deng, Lili
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Xueting
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Xueting
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ganbiao
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Ganbiao
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Yongxing
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Yongxing
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Mingwei
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9538-2173
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Mingwei
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651326$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kk1v1DAQhi1URD_gB3BBkZBQLyl2_JkL0lK1tFIlOMDZcifjjatsvNhZPv59vU2pdhFCPtgaP-_rmfEck4MxjkjIa0bPGDPqfWZNK3VNWVszzUQtn5EjJrSutWHtwc75kBznfEdpw7nkL8ghZ0oy3qgjcnEVln2Fv9YJcw5xrKKvLhcfv4jKjd3DSVVhrNZuCjhOufoZpr6COMSEMLmhAjcCppfkuXdDxleP-wn5dnnx9fyqvvn86fp8cVODVHyqDQdoO6Y6JyTeUm2carXQgMKLhilvuAStNfcCOffGQ6uYR8cEp8I3ruEn5Hr27aK7s-sUVi79ttEF-xCIaWldmgIMaAEQqW-UF7oTEqTjBqmWojGlXV279fowe603tyvsoJSX3LBnun8zht4u4w-rDBOsYcXg9NEgxe8bzJNdhQw4DG7EuMm24bSVVBayoG9ndOlKamH0sTjCFrcLRYUUwoi2UGf_oMrqcBWgfL0PJb4neLcj6NENU5_jsJnKR-Z98M1urU9F_pmDArAZgBRzTuifEEbtdtbsPGu2NM9uZ83KotF_aSBMbvt2STsM_1HeA82X0_I
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_biom13121753
crossref_primary_10_1080_19490976_2022_2139978
crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2024_14813
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines9101460
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_27689
crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules26061659
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_13200_6
crossref_primary_10_3233_TUB_220035
crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2022_999084
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16091678
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms23179648
crossref_primary_10_1039_D1FO01936H
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_3640589
crossref_primary_10_1097_CAD_0000000000001515
crossref_primary_10_2147_JIR_S324336
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12192_020_01153_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eclinm_2023_101827
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_023_03104_1
crossref_primary_10_1631_jzus_B2000366
crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_3905367
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gastha_2022_01_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2024_109859
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12860_020_00295_w
crossref_primary_10_1080_1354750X_2024_2420196
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2022_773671
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1201616
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canlet_2024_217324
crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm11020154
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cca_2024_120029
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1371599
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2022_948610
crossref_primary_10_3390_cells10102782
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2022_1032806
crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2022_911378
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_3764914
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12863_022_01086_2
crossref_primary_10_1177_03000605211006522
crossref_primary_10_18632_aging_203771
Cites_doi 10.1089/sur.2014.073
10.1074/jbc.R110.135210
10.18632/oncotarget.12140
10.3322/caac.20038
10.1038/nm.2492
10.1002/mc.22485
10.1002/jcp.28190
10.1080/07435809609043778
10.1007/s10654-014-9901-8
10.3390/ijms20020296
10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.033
10.1111/ajco.12501
10.3322/caac.21492
10.1093/carcin/18.12.2353
10.3322/caac.21332
10.1007/978-1-4757-2670-1_12
10.1177/0961203313517405
10.1007/s00125-012-2737-4
10.1006/bbrc.1993.1027
10.1038/sj.jhh.1002098
10.1016/j.mce.2017.09.005
10.1093/aje/kwj063
10.3109/00365528809093865
10.1177/1947601913499155
10.1210/endo.141.9.7637
10.1126/science.274.5291.1377
10.1136/gut.33.1_Suppl.S9
10.3892/or.2013.2859
10.21037/jgo.2018.04.01
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd.
The Author(s). 2019
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: The Author(s). 2019
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12957-019-1714-5
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) (Open Access)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic




Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1477-7819
EndPage 13
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_ccee0f26f47d45c5a38e075428019d92
PMC6814121
A604544849
31651326
10_1186_s12957_019_1714_5
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province
  grantid: 1508085MH150
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 1508085MH150
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29R
2WC
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
~8M
-A0
3V.
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
FRP
NPM
PMFND
7X8
PPXIY
5PM
PJZUB
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-83cc9d16da45eb078a69747ce4f4216f835c7773f4e33f8fc961fea14304f2a23
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1477-7819
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 00:35:38 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:13:20 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 09:44:57 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:20:51 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:44:30 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:07:04 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:59:13 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:17 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:21:27 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Biomarkers
FABP4
FABP6
Colorectal cancer
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c563t-83cc9d16da45eb078a69747ce4f4216f835c7773f4e33f8fc961fea14304f2a23
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-9538-2173
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12957-019-1714-5
PMID 31651326
PQID 2309505213
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ccee0f26f47d45c5a38e075428019d92
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6814121
proquest_miscellaneous_2309505213
gale_infotracmisc_A604544849
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A604544849
gale_healthsolutions_A604544849
pubmed_primary_31651326
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_019_1714_5
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12957_019_1714_5
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-10-24
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-10-24
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-10-24
  day: 24
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle World journal of surgical oncology
PublicationTitleAlternate World J Surg Oncol
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References C Jing (1714_CR14) 2000; 60
S Parra (1714_CR25) 2014; 23
RS ImrayCH (1714_CR8) 1992; 33
R Siegel (1714_CR2) 2014; 64
T Ohmachi (1714_CR13) 2006; 12
S Guaita-Esteruelas (1714_CR15) 2017; 56
Z Bao (1714_CR18) 2013; 4
KT Uysal (1714_CR40) 2000; 141
S Kralisch (1714_CR6) 2013; 56
KJ Thompson (1714_CR29) 2017; 38
R Das (1714_CR16) 2001; 7
WJ Kurtz (1714_CR11) 1983; 8
M Chen (1714_CR21) 2016; 12
J Storch (1714_CR5) 2010; 285
1714_CR1
K Aleksandrova (1714_CR37) 2014; 29
DJ Morris (1714_CR35) 1996; 22
X Shen (1714_CR19) 2016; 12
M Furuhashi (1714_CR33) 2008; 118
KM Nieman (1714_CR7) 2011; 17
RZ Liu (1714_CR24) 2003; 270
MM Center (1714_CR4) 2009; 59
NP Long (1714_CR32) 2019; 20
JM Sayagués (1714_CR30) 2016; 7
1714_CR34
V Ulaganathan (1714_CR23) 2018; 9
D Lee (1714_CR42) 2014; 31
Dongmei Zhao (1714_CR20) 2019; 234
TM Bingold (1714_CR26) 2015; 16
MJ Hill (1714_CR10) 1987; 2
Jiangbo Jin (1714_CR31) 2018; 461
G Cramer (1714_CR27) 2014; 113
T Hashimoto (1714_CR17) 2004; 71
M Venturi (1714_CR43) 1997; 18
T Marotta (1714_CR38) 2007; 21
NJ Perkins (1714_CR22) 2006; 163
L Huang (1714_CR39) 2018; 21
V Ulaganathan (1714_CR36) 2018; 25
RL Siegel (1714_CR3) 2016; 66
JT Korpela (1714_CR9) 1988; 23
H Fujii (1714_CR12) 1993; 190
HB El-Serag (1714_CR28) 2014; 60
GS Hotamisligil (1714_CR41) 1996; 274
References_xml – volume: 16
  start-page: 3
  year: 2015
  ident: 1714_CR26
  publication-title: Surg Infect (Larchmt)
  doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.073
– volume: 285
  start-page: 43
  year: 2010
  ident: 1714_CR5
  publication-title: J Biol Chem
  doi: 10.1074/jbc.R110.135210
– volume: 7
  start-page: 45
  year: 2016
  ident: 1714_CR30
  publication-title: Oncotarget.
  doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12140
– volume: 25
  start-page: 17
  year: 2018
  ident: 1714_CR36
  publication-title: J Carcinog
– volume: 59
  start-page: 6
  year: 2009
  ident: 1714_CR4
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/caac.20038
– volume: 17
  start-page: 11
  year: 2011
  ident: 1714_CR7
  publication-title: Nat Med
  doi: 10.1038/nm.2492
– volume: 56
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 1714_CR15
  publication-title: Mol Carcinog
  doi: 10.1002/mc.22485
– volume: 234
  start-page: 15429
  issue: 9
  year: 2019
  ident: 1714_CR20
  publication-title: Journal of Cellular Physiology
  doi: 10.1002/jcp.28190
– volume: 7
  start-page: 6
  year: 2001
  ident: 1714_CR16
  publication-title: Clin Cancer Res
– volume: 22
  start-page: 4
  year: 1996
  ident: 1714_CR35
  publication-title: Endocr Res
  doi: 10.1080/07435809609043778
– volume: 29
  start-page: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 1714_CR37
  publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9901-8
– volume: 21
  start-page: 12
  year: 2018
  ident: 1714_CR39
  publication-title: Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi
– volume: 20
  start-page: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 1714_CR32
  publication-title: Int J Mol Sci
  doi: 10.3390/ijms20020296
– volume: 113
  start-page: 7
  year: 2014
  ident: 1714_CR27
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.033
– volume: 118
  start-page: 7
  year: 2008
  ident: 1714_CR33
  publication-title: J Clin Invest
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 1714_CR21
  publication-title: Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
  doi: 10.1111/ajco.12501
– ident: 1714_CR1
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
– volume: 18
  start-page: 2
  year: 1997
  ident: 1714_CR43
  publication-title: Carcinogenesis
  doi: 10.1093/carcin/18.12.2353
– volume: 66
  start-page: 4
  year: 2016
  ident: 1714_CR3
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21332
– ident: 1714_CR34
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2670-1_12
– volume: 270
  start-page: 15
  year: 2003
  ident: 1714_CR24
  publication-title: Eur J Biochem
– volume: 23
  start-page: 3
  year: 2014
  ident: 1714_CR25
  publication-title: Lupus.
  doi: 10.1177/0961203313517405
– volume: 56
  start-page: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 1714_CR6
  publication-title: Diabetologia.
  doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2737-4
– volume: 60
  start-page: 5
  year: 2014
  ident: 1714_CR28
  publication-title: Hepatology.
– volume: 190
  start-page: 1
  year: 1993
  ident: 1714_CR12
  publication-title: Biochem Biophys Res Commun
  doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1027
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1
  year: 2007
  ident: 1714_CR38
  publication-title: J Hum Hypertens
  doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002098
– volume: 461
  start-page: 155
  year: 2018
  ident: 1714_CR31
  publication-title: Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
  doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.09.005
– volume: 163
  start-page: 6
  year: 2006
  ident: 1714_CR22
  publication-title: Am J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj063
– volume: 12
  start-page: 5
  year: 2016
  ident: 1714_CR19
  publication-title: Oncol Lett
– volume: 23
  start-page: 3
  year: 1988
  ident: 1714_CR9
  publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.3109/00365528809093865
– volume: 64
  start-page: 2
  year: 2014
  ident: 1714_CR2
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
– volume: 12
  start-page: 17
  year: 2006
  ident: 1714_CR13
  publication-title: Clin Cancer Res
– volume: 4
  start-page: 7
  year: 2013
  ident: 1714_CR18
  publication-title: Genes Cancer
  doi: 10.1177/1947601913499155
– volume: 38
  start-page: 6
  year: 2017
  ident: 1714_CR29
  publication-title: Liver Int
– volume: 141
  start-page: 9
  year: 2000
  ident: 1714_CR40
  publication-title: Endocrinology
  doi: 10.1210/endo.141.9.7637
– volume: 274
  start-page: 5291
  year: 1996
  ident: 1714_CR41
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.274.5291.1377
– volume: 33
  start-page: 9
  year: 1992
  ident: 1714_CR8
  publication-title: Gut
  doi: 10.1136/gut.33.1_Suppl.S9
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1
  year: 1983
  ident: 1714_CR11
  publication-title: Tokai J Exp Clin Med
– volume: 71
  start-page: 5
  year: 2004
  ident: 1714_CR17
  publication-title: Pathobiology
– volume: 60
  start-page: 9
  year: 2000
  ident: 1714_CR14
  publication-title: Cancer Res
– volume: 31
  start-page: 3
  year: 2014
  ident: 1714_CR42
  publication-title: Oncology Reports
  doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2859
– volume: 2
  start-page: 8565
  year: 1987
  ident: 1714_CR10
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 9
  start-page: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 1714_CR23
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Oncol
  doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.04.01
SSID ssj0023353
Score 2.4246802
Snippet To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the...
Objective To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in...
Abstract Objective To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 171
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Biological markers
Biomarkers
Cancer metastasis
Cancer patients
Carcinoembryonic Antigen - analysis
Care and treatment
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - chemistry
Colorectal Neoplasms - etiology
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Development and progression
Diagnosis
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Enzymes
FABP4
FABP6
Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins - analysis
Female
Gastrointestinal Hormones - analysis
Gene expression
Genetic aspects
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Regression analysis
Risk factors
Surgery
Tumors
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) (Open Access)
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlh9JLafp0k6YqFAoFEestHzchSyi09NBAbkKWJRoo3pLdQH5-ZmTtsqbQXnoz1thYo3nKo28I-WhdigE33QWXiSHCHIPgKLCuV9YMduAilQLZb-bySn251td7rb6wJmyCB54YdxrBirdZmKzsoHTUQbrUYttWMK3d0BXrCz5vm0zVVEtKLes_TO7M6Rq8msYSy45hw2-mZ16ogPX_aZL3fNK8XnLPAS2fkac1cqSL6YsPyaM0PiePv9Z_4y_IBZZs0HRfK1tHusp0uTj7rmgYh3Jl6M1IK5DqmuIOLEXMarR58OKI63_7klwtL36cX7LaJIFFbeSGORljN3AzBKVTDw4_GEwRYlJZCW4yRFjRWiuzSlJml2NneE4BwqRWZRGEfEUOxtWY3hDqIFlynet7BUmZsZBmQ_yVep1iGxFZsCHtlmk-VgRxbGTxy5dMwhk_8dkDnz3y2euGfN498nuCz_gb8RmuxI4Qka_LDZAHX-XB_0seGvIe19FPx0h3-usXBsEGlcNpfCoUqMHw-THUgwjABMTCmlEezyhB8-Js-MNWVjwOYbnamFZ3ay-Qc3gsWjbk9SQ7u1lJbjSHoLkhdiZVs2nPR8abnwX42ziuuOBv_wefjsgTUfShZUIdk4PN7V16B_HVpj8pqvQAPWUdQA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title High expression of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with colorectal cancer
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651326
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2309505213
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6814121
https://doaj.org/article/ccee0f26f47d45c5a38e075428019d92
Volume 17
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3di9QwEA_3AeKL-G31XCMIglBtvtMHkV3Z5RDuOA4XFl9Cm6Z6cHR1dw_O_96ZNLtc8RB8KaWZlmYyk5lJJr8h5I2xwVe46M6ZCDkizOXgHFV5WUujG9MwHmKC7Kk-nssvC7XYI9vyVomB61tDO6wnNV9dvr_-9fsTKPzHqPBWf1iDzVKYQFnmWM47V_vkEAyTwYIGJ3K3qcCFiKCUTBqTG7CEaZPz1k8MzFRE8_97zr5htIYJlTcs1Ow-uZdcSzruZeEB2QvdQ3LnJG2ePyJTzOmg4TqlvnZ02dLZeHImadU18U7Ti44mpNU1xSVaiqDWOCnChz0KyOoxmc-mXz8f56mKQu6VFpvcCu_LhummkirU4BFUGmMIH2QrOdMtuGDeGCNaGYRobetLzdpQgR9VyJZXXDwhB92yC88ItRBN2dLWtYSoTRuIw8FBC7UKvvAIPZiRYss05xPEOFa6uHQx1LDa9Xx2wGeHfHYqI-92r_zs8TX-RTzBkdgRIjR2fLBcfXdJ05wHs1-0XLfSNFJ5VQkbCqzzC7a4bEqekVc4jq4_Z7pTcDfWiEYoLXbjbaRAoYPf91U6qQBMQLCsAeXRgBJU0w-aX29lxWET5rN1YXm1dhw5h-emRUae9rKz65VgWjHwqjNiBlI16Pawpbv4EZHBtWWScfb8f5j6gtzlUe6LnMsjcrBZXYWX4Ght6hHZNwszIoeT6enZ-SguV4yiSsH1fPLtD6RwIgs
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High+expression+of+FABP4+and+FABP6+in+patients+with+colorectal+cancer&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+surgical+oncology&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Yaqin&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Xiaotong&rft.au=Deng%2C+Lili&rft.au=Li%2C+Xueting&rft.date=2019-10-24&rft.issn=1477-7819&rft.eissn=1477-7819&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12957-019-1714-5&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s12957_019_1714_5
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon