High expression of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with colorectal cancer
To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC. In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immu...
Saved in:
Published in | World journal of surgical oncology Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 171 - 13 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
24.10.2019
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC.
In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke's and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340-2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8-96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7-89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8-57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2-67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0-69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3-86.8), respectively.
Increased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC.
In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke's and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340-2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8-96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7-89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8-57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2-67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0-69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3-86.8), respectively.
Increased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC. To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC.OBJECTIVETo explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC.In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.METHODSIn total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke's and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340-2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8-96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7-89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8-57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2-67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0-69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3-86.8), respectively.RESULTSThe serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke's and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340-2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8-96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7-89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8-57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2-67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0-69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3-86.8), respectively.Increased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC.CONCLUSIONIncreased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC. Objective To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC. Methods In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke's and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340-2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8-96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7-89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8-57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2-67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0-69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3-86.8), respectively. Conclusion Increased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC. Keywords: Colorectal cancer, FABP4, FABP6, Biomarkers Abstract Objective To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC. Methods In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke’s and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340–2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8–96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7–89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8–57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2–67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0–69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3–86.8), respectively. Conclusion Increased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC. To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC. In total, 100 CRC patients and 100 controls were enrolled. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before and 2 weeks after radical resection of CRC. The protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were observed in colorectal tumor tissues and adjacent tissues by immunohistochemistry and western blot, respectively. The diagnostic performance of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The serum levels of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with CRC were higher than the levels in the controls before surgery (P < 0.001), and significantly decreased at 2 weeks after operation (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of human colorectal tumor tissues, and only a small amount distributed in adjacent tissues. Western blot revealed that the protein expressions of FABP4 and FABP6 were significantly higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Tumors with high and low FABP4 and FABP6 expression have no significant correlation in tumor size, tumor site, distant organ and lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, lymphatic permeation, neurological invasion, vascular invasion, and Duke's and TNM classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FABP4 and FABP6 were independent risk factors for CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.916; 95%CI 1.340-2.492; P < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 2.162; 95%CI 1.046, 1.078); P < 0.001, respectively). In discriminating CRC from the normal control, the optimal sensitivity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 93.20% (95%CI 87.8-96.7) and 83.70% (95%CI 76.7-89.3), respectively, while the optimal specificity of FABP4 and FABP6 were 48.8% (95%CI 39.8-57.9) and 58.4% (95%CI 49.2-67.1), respectively. When combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic (CEA) and FABP4 and FABP6, the optimal sensitivity and specificity were 61.33% (95%CI 53.0-69.2) and 79.82% (95%CI 71.3-86.8), respectively. Increased expression of FABP4 and FABP6 not only were strong risk factors for the development of CRC but could also represent a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis in Chinese patients. Combined detection of CEA with FABP4 and FABP6 could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CRC. |
ArticleNumber | 171 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Li, Yongxing Chen, Mingwei Deng, Lili Zhao, Xiaotong Li, Xueting Zhang, Yaqin Wang, Ganbiao |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yaqin surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Yaqin – sequence: 2 givenname: Xiaotong surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Xiaotong – sequence: 3 givenname: Lili surname: Deng fullname: Deng, Lili – sequence: 4 givenname: Xueting surname: Li fullname: Li, Xueting – sequence: 5 givenname: Ganbiao surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Ganbiao – sequence: 6 givenname: Yongxing surname: Li fullname: Li, Yongxing – sequence: 7 givenname: Mingwei orcidid: 0000-0002-9538-2173 surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Mingwei |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651326$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kk1v1DAQhi1URD_gB3BBkZBQLyl2_JkL0lK1tFIlOMDZcifjjatsvNhZPv59vU2pdhFCPtgaP-_rmfEck4MxjkjIa0bPGDPqfWZNK3VNWVszzUQtn5EjJrSutWHtwc75kBznfEdpw7nkL8ghZ0oy3qgjcnEVln2Fv9YJcw5xrKKvLhcfv4jKjd3DSVVhrNZuCjhOufoZpr6COMSEMLmhAjcCppfkuXdDxleP-wn5dnnx9fyqvvn86fp8cVODVHyqDQdoO6Y6JyTeUm2carXQgMKLhilvuAStNfcCOffGQ6uYR8cEp8I3ruEn5Hr27aK7s-sUVi79ttEF-xCIaWldmgIMaAEQqW-UF7oTEqTjBqmWojGlXV279fowe603tyvsoJSX3LBnun8zht4u4w-rDBOsYcXg9NEgxe8bzJNdhQw4DG7EuMm24bSVVBayoG9ndOlKamH0sTjCFrcLRYUUwoi2UGf_oMrqcBWgfL0PJb4neLcj6NENU5_jsJnKR-Z98M1urU9F_pmDArAZgBRzTuifEEbtdtbsPGu2NM9uZ83KotF_aSBMbvt2STsM_1HeA82X0_I |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_biom13121753 crossref_primary_10_1080_19490976_2022_2139978 crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2024_14813 crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines9101460 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_27689 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules26061659 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_13200_6 crossref_primary_10_3233_TUB_220035 crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2022_999084 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16091678 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms23179648 crossref_primary_10_1039_D1FO01936H crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_3640589 crossref_primary_10_1097_CAD_0000000000001515 crossref_primary_10_2147_JIR_S324336 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12192_020_01153_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eclinm_2023_101827 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_023_03104_1 crossref_primary_10_1631_jzus_B2000366 crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_3905367 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gastha_2022_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2024_109859 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12860_020_00295_w crossref_primary_10_1080_1354750X_2024_2420196 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2022_773671 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1201616 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canlet_2024_217324 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm11020154 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cca_2024_120029 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1371599 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2022_948610 crossref_primary_10_3390_cells10102782 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2022_1032806 crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2022_911378 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_3764914 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12863_022_01086_2 crossref_primary_10_1177_03000605211006522 crossref_primary_10_18632_aging_203771 |
Cites_doi | 10.1089/sur.2014.073 10.1074/jbc.R110.135210 10.18632/oncotarget.12140 10.3322/caac.20038 10.1038/nm.2492 10.1002/mc.22485 10.1002/jcp.28190 10.1080/07435809609043778 10.1007/s10654-014-9901-8 10.3390/ijms20020296 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.033 10.1111/ajco.12501 10.3322/caac.21492 10.1093/carcin/18.12.2353 10.3322/caac.21332 10.1007/978-1-4757-2670-1_12 10.1177/0961203313517405 10.1007/s00125-012-2737-4 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1027 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002098 10.1016/j.mce.2017.09.005 10.1093/aje/kwj063 10.3109/00365528809093865 10.1177/1947601913499155 10.1210/endo.141.9.7637 10.1126/science.274.5291.1377 10.1136/gut.33.1_Suppl.S9 10.3892/or.2013.2859 10.21037/jgo.2018.04.01 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd. The Author(s). 2019 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: The Author(s). 2019 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12957-019-1714-5 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) (Open Access) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1477-7819 |
EndPage | 13 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_ccee0f26f47d45c5a38e075428019d92 PMC6814121 A604544849 31651326 10_1186_s12957_019_1714_5 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province grantid: 1508085MH150 – fundername: ; grantid: 1508085MH150 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29R 2WC 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EJD ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR IHW INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB ~8M -A0 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF FRP NPM PMFND 7X8 PPXIY 5PM PJZUB PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-83cc9d16da45eb078a69747ce4f4216f835c7773f4e33f8fc961fea14304f2a23 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1477-7819 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 00:35:38 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:13:20 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:44:57 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:20:51 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:44:30 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:07:04 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:59:13 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:17 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:21:27 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Biomarkers FABP4 FABP6 Colorectal cancer |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c563t-83cc9d16da45eb078a69747ce4f4216f835c7773f4e33f8fc961fea14304f2a23 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-9538-2173 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12957-019-1714-5 |
PMID | 31651326 |
PQID | 2309505213 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ccee0f26f47d45c5a38e075428019d92 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6814121 proquest_miscellaneous_2309505213 gale_infotracmisc_A604544849 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A604544849 gale_healthsolutions_A604544849 pubmed_primary_31651326 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_019_1714_5 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12957_019_1714_5 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-10-24 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-10-24 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2019 text: 2019-10-24 day: 24 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | World journal of surgical oncology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | World J Surg Oncol |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | C Jing (1714_CR14) 2000; 60 S Parra (1714_CR25) 2014; 23 RS ImrayCH (1714_CR8) 1992; 33 R Siegel (1714_CR2) 2014; 64 T Ohmachi (1714_CR13) 2006; 12 S Guaita-Esteruelas (1714_CR15) 2017; 56 Z Bao (1714_CR18) 2013; 4 KT Uysal (1714_CR40) 2000; 141 S Kralisch (1714_CR6) 2013; 56 KJ Thompson (1714_CR29) 2017; 38 R Das (1714_CR16) 2001; 7 WJ Kurtz (1714_CR11) 1983; 8 M Chen (1714_CR21) 2016; 12 J Storch (1714_CR5) 2010; 285 1714_CR1 K Aleksandrova (1714_CR37) 2014; 29 DJ Morris (1714_CR35) 1996; 22 X Shen (1714_CR19) 2016; 12 M Furuhashi (1714_CR33) 2008; 118 KM Nieman (1714_CR7) 2011; 17 RZ Liu (1714_CR24) 2003; 270 MM Center (1714_CR4) 2009; 59 NP Long (1714_CR32) 2019; 20 JM Sayagués (1714_CR30) 2016; 7 1714_CR34 V Ulaganathan (1714_CR23) 2018; 9 D Lee (1714_CR42) 2014; 31 Dongmei Zhao (1714_CR20) 2019; 234 TM Bingold (1714_CR26) 2015; 16 MJ Hill (1714_CR10) 1987; 2 Jiangbo Jin (1714_CR31) 2018; 461 G Cramer (1714_CR27) 2014; 113 T Hashimoto (1714_CR17) 2004; 71 M Venturi (1714_CR43) 1997; 18 T Marotta (1714_CR38) 2007; 21 NJ Perkins (1714_CR22) 2006; 163 L Huang (1714_CR39) 2018; 21 V Ulaganathan (1714_CR36) 2018; 25 RL Siegel (1714_CR3) 2016; 66 JT Korpela (1714_CR9) 1988; 23 H Fujii (1714_CR12) 1993; 190 HB El-Serag (1714_CR28) 2014; 60 GS Hotamisligil (1714_CR41) 1996; 274 |
References_xml | – volume: 16 start-page: 3 year: 2015 ident: 1714_CR26 publication-title: Surg Infect (Larchmt) doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.073 – volume: 285 start-page: 43 year: 2010 ident: 1714_CR5 publication-title: J Biol Chem doi: 10.1074/jbc.R110.135210 – volume: 7 start-page: 45 year: 2016 ident: 1714_CR30 publication-title: Oncotarget. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12140 – volume: 25 start-page: 17 year: 2018 ident: 1714_CR36 publication-title: J Carcinog – volume: 59 start-page: 6 year: 2009 ident: 1714_CR4 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.20038 – volume: 17 start-page: 11 year: 2011 ident: 1714_CR7 publication-title: Nat Med doi: 10.1038/nm.2492 – volume: 56 start-page: 1 year: 2017 ident: 1714_CR15 publication-title: Mol Carcinog doi: 10.1002/mc.22485 – volume: 234 start-page: 15429 issue: 9 year: 2019 ident: 1714_CR20 publication-title: Journal of Cellular Physiology doi: 10.1002/jcp.28190 – volume: 7 start-page: 6 year: 2001 ident: 1714_CR16 publication-title: Clin Cancer Res – volume: 22 start-page: 4 year: 1996 ident: 1714_CR35 publication-title: Endocr Res doi: 10.1080/07435809609043778 – volume: 29 start-page: 4 year: 2014 ident: 1714_CR37 publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9901-8 – volume: 21 start-page: 12 year: 2018 ident: 1714_CR39 publication-title: Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi – volume: 20 start-page: 2 year: 2019 ident: 1714_CR32 publication-title: Int J Mol Sci doi: 10.3390/ijms20020296 – volume: 113 start-page: 7 year: 2014 ident: 1714_CR27 publication-title: Am J Cardiol doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.033 – volume: 118 start-page: 7 year: 2008 ident: 1714_CR33 publication-title: J Clin Invest – volume: 12 start-page: 1 year: 2016 ident: 1714_CR21 publication-title: Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology doi: 10.1111/ajco.12501 – ident: 1714_CR1 doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 – volume: 18 start-page: 2 year: 1997 ident: 1714_CR43 publication-title: Carcinogenesis doi: 10.1093/carcin/18.12.2353 – volume: 66 start-page: 4 year: 2016 ident: 1714_CR3 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.21332 – ident: 1714_CR34 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2670-1_12 – volume: 270 start-page: 15 year: 2003 ident: 1714_CR24 publication-title: Eur J Biochem – volume: 23 start-page: 3 year: 2014 ident: 1714_CR25 publication-title: Lupus. doi: 10.1177/0961203313517405 – volume: 56 start-page: 1 year: 2013 ident: 1714_CR6 publication-title: Diabetologia. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2737-4 – volume: 60 start-page: 5 year: 2014 ident: 1714_CR28 publication-title: Hepatology. – volume: 190 start-page: 1 year: 1993 ident: 1714_CR12 publication-title: Biochem Biophys Res Commun doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1027 – volume: 21 start-page: 1 year: 2007 ident: 1714_CR38 publication-title: J Hum Hypertens doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002098 – volume: 461 start-page: 155 year: 2018 ident: 1714_CR31 publication-title: Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.09.005 – volume: 163 start-page: 6 year: 2006 ident: 1714_CR22 publication-title: Am J Epidemiol doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj063 – volume: 12 start-page: 5 year: 2016 ident: 1714_CR19 publication-title: Oncol Lett – volume: 23 start-page: 3 year: 1988 ident: 1714_CR9 publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol doi: 10.3109/00365528809093865 – volume: 64 start-page: 2 year: 2014 ident: 1714_CR2 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin – volume: 12 start-page: 17 year: 2006 ident: 1714_CR13 publication-title: Clin Cancer Res – volume: 4 start-page: 7 year: 2013 ident: 1714_CR18 publication-title: Genes Cancer doi: 10.1177/1947601913499155 – volume: 38 start-page: 6 year: 2017 ident: 1714_CR29 publication-title: Liver Int – volume: 141 start-page: 9 year: 2000 ident: 1714_CR40 publication-title: Endocrinology doi: 10.1210/endo.141.9.7637 – volume: 274 start-page: 5291 year: 1996 ident: 1714_CR41 publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.274.5291.1377 – volume: 33 start-page: 9 year: 1992 ident: 1714_CR8 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gut.33.1_Suppl.S9 – volume: 8 start-page: 1 year: 1983 ident: 1714_CR11 publication-title: Tokai J Exp Clin Med – volume: 71 start-page: 5 year: 2004 ident: 1714_CR17 publication-title: Pathobiology – volume: 60 start-page: 9 year: 2000 ident: 1714_CR14 publication-title: Cancer Res – volume: 31 start-page: 3 year: 2014 ident: 1714_CR42 publication-title: Oncology Reports doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2859 – volume: 2 start-page: 8565 year: 1987 ident: 1714_CR10 publication-title: Lancet – volume: 9 start-page: 4 year: 2018 ident: 1714_CR23 publication-title: J Gastrointest Oncol doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.04.01 |
SSID | ssj0023353 |
Score | 2.4246802 |
Snippet | To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in the... Objective To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as biomarkers in... Abstract Objective To explore the relationship between FABP4 and FABP6 expression and the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential as... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 171 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Biological markers Biomarkers Cancer metastasis Cancer patients Carcinoembryonic Antigen - analysis Care and treatment Colorectal cancer Colorectal Neoplasms - chemistry Colorectal Neoplasms - etiology Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology Development and progression Diagnosis Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Enzymes FABP4 FABP6 Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins - analysis Female Gastrointestinal Hormones - analysis Gene expression Genetic aspects Humans Immunohistochemistry Logistic Models Male Middle Aged Regression analysis Risk factors Surgery Tumors |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) (Open Access) dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlh9JLafp0k6YqFAoFEestHzchSyi09NBAbkKWJRoo3pLdQH5-ZmTtsqbQXnoz1thYo3nKo28I-WhdigE33QWXiSHCHIPgKLCuV9YMduAilQLZb-bySn251td7rb6wJmyCB54YdxrBirdZmKzsoHTUQbrUYttWMK3d0BXrCz5vm0zVVEtKLes_TO7M6Rq8msYSy45hw2-mZ16ogPX_aZL3fNK8XnLPAS2fkac1cqSL6YsPyaM0PiePv9Z_4y_IBZZs0HRfK1tHusp0uTj7rmgYh3Jl6M1IK5DqmuIOLEXMarR58OKI63_7klwtL36cX7LaJIFFbeSGORljN3AzBKVTDw4_GEwRYlJZCW4yRFjRWiuzSlJml2NneE4BwqRWZRGEfEUOxtWY3hDqIFlynet7BUmZsZBmQ_yVep1iGxFZsCHtlmk-VgRxbGTxy5dMwhk_8dkDnz3y2euGfN498nuCz_gb8RmuxI4Qka_LDZAHX-XB_0seGvIe19FPx0h3-usXBsEGlcNpfCoUqMHw-THUgwjABMTCmlEezyhB8-Js-MNWVjwOYbnamFZ3ay-Qc3gsWjbk9SQ7u1lJbjSHoLkhdiZVs2nPR8abnwX42ziuuOBv_wefjsgTUfShZUIdk4PN7V16B_HVpj8pqvQAPWUdQA priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | High expression of FABP4 and FABP6 in patients with colorectal cancer |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651326 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2309505213 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6814121 https://doaj.org/article/ccee0f26f47d45c5a38e075428019d92 |
Volume | 17 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3di9QwEA_3AeKL-G31XCMIglBtvtMHkV3Z5RDuOA4XFl9Cm6Z6cHR1dw_O_96ZNLtc8RB8KaWZlmYyk5lJJr8h5I2xwVe46M6ZCDkizOXgHFV5WUujG9MwHmKC7Kk-nssvC7XYI9vyVomB61tDO6wnNV9dvr_-9fsTKPzHqPBWf1iDzVKYQFnmWM47V_vkEAyTwYIGJ3K3qcCFiKCUTBqTG7CEaZPz1k8MzFRE8_97zr5htIYJlTcs1Ow-uZdcSzruZeEB2QvdQ3LnJG2ePyJTzOmg4TqlvnZ02dLZeHImadU18U7Ti44mpNU1xSVaiqDWOCnChz0KyOoxmc-mXz8f56mKQu6VFpvcCu_LhummkirU4BFUGmMIH2QrOdMtuGDeGCNaGYRobetLzdpQgR9VyJZXXDwhB92yC88ItRBN2dLWtYSoTRuIw8FBC7UKvvAIPZiRYss05xPEOFa6uHQx1LDa9Xx2wGeHfHYqI-92r_zs8TX-RTzBkdgRIjR2fLBcfXdJ05wHs1-0XLfSNFJ5VQkbCqzzC7a4bEqekVc4jq4_Z7pTcDfWiEYoLXbjbaRAoYPf91U6qQBMQLCsAeXRgBJU0w-aX29lxWET5rN1YXm1dhw5h-emRUae9rKz65VgWjHwqjNiBlI16Pawpbv4EZHBtWWScfb8f5j6gtzlUe6LnMsjcrBZXYWX4Ght6hHZNwszIoeT6enZ-SguV4yiSsH1fPLtD6RwIgs |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High+expression+of+FABP4+and+FABP6+in+patients+with+colorectal+cancer&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+surgical+oncology&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Yaqin&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Xiaotong&rft.au=Deng%2C+Lili&rft.au=Li%2C+Xueting&rft.date=2019-10-24&rft.issn=1477-7819&rft.eissn=1477-7819&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12957-019-1714-5&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s12957_019_1714_5 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon |