A novel language-neutral Visual Cognitive Assessment Test (VCAT): validation in four Southeast Asian countries

• Published in: Alzheimer's research & therapy Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 6 - 9
• Main Authors: Lim, Levinia, Ng, Tze Pin, Ong, Anam Paulus, Tan, Maw Pin, Cenina, Alvin Rae, Gao, Qi, Ng, Adeline, Kandiah, Nagaendran
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 22.01.2018; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Aged; Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis; Alzheimer’s disease; Asia, Southeastern; Care and treatment; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnosis; Cognitive test; Culture; Dementia; Diagnosis; Female; Humans; Language; Male; Mild cognitive impairment; Neuropsychological Tests; Photic Stimulation; Prospective Studies; ROC Curve; Screening tool; Testing; Asia, Southeastern; Southeast Asia; Cognitive test; Screening tool; Alzheimer’s disease; Mild cognitive impairment; Dementia
• ISSN: 1758-9193; 1758-9193
• DOI: 10.1186/s13195-017-0333-z

Cognitive screeners are imperative for early diagnosis of dementia. The Visual Cognitive Assessment Test (VCAT) is a language-neutral, visual-based test which has proven useful for a multilingual population in a single-center study. However, its performance utility is unknown in a wider and more diverse Southeast Asian cohort. We recruited 164 healthy controls (HC) and 120 cognitively impaired (CI) subjects- 47 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 73 mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia participants, from four countries between January 2015 and August 2016 to determine the usefulness of a single version of the VCAT, without translation or adaptation, in a multinational, multilingual population. The VCAT was administered along with established cognitive evaluation. The VCAT, without local translation or adaptation, was effective in discriminating between HC and CI subjects (MCI and mild AD dementia). Mean (SD) VCAT scores for HC and CI subjects were 22.48 (3.50) and 14.17 (5.05) respectively. Areas under the curve for Montreal Cognitive Assessment (0.916, 95% CI 0.884-0.948) and the VCAT (0.905, 95% CI 0.870-0.940) in discriminating between HCs and CIs were comparable. The multiple languages used to administer VCAT in four countries did not significantly influence test scores. The VCAT without the need for language translation or cultural adaptation showed satisfactory discriminative ability and was effective in a multinational, multilingual Southeast Asian population.