“It’s like ‘liquid handcuffs”: The effects of take-home dosing policies on Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) patients’ lives
Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and transmission of blood-borne viruses like HIV and HCV among people that use opioids. Yet, MMT's use of restrictive take-home dose policies that force most patien...
Saved in:
Published in | Harm reduction journal Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 88 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
14.08.2021
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and transmission of blood-borne viruses like HIV and HCV among people that use opioids. Yet, MMT's use of restrictive take-home dose policies that force most patients to attend their clinic on a daily, or near-daily, basis may be unpopular with many patients and lead to low rates of treatment uptake and retention. In response, this article examines how clinics' take-home dosing policies have affected patients' experiences of treatment and lives in general.
This article is based on semi-structured, qualitative interviews with a variety of stakeholders in MMT. Interviews explored: reasons for engaging with, or not engaging with MMT; how MMT is conceptualized by patients and treatment providers (e.g., as harm reduction or route to abstinence and/or recovery); experiences with MMT; perception of barriers to MMT (e.g., organizational/regulatory, social) and how MMT might be improved to support peoples' substance use treatment needs and goals.
Nearly all of the patients with past or present MMT use were highly critical of the limited access to take-home doses and consequent need for daily or near daily clinic attendance. Participants described how the use of restrictive take-home dose policies negatively impacted their ability to meet day-to-day responsibilities and also cited the need for daily attendance as a reason for quitting or avoiding OAT. Responses also demonstrate how such policies contribute to an environment of cruelty and stigma within many clinics that exposes this already-stigmatized population to additional trauma.
Take-home dose policies in MMT are not working for a substantial number of patients and are reasonably seen by participants as degrading and dehumanizing. Revision of MMT regulations and policies regarding take home doses are essential to improve patient satisfaction and the quality and effectiveness of MMT as a key evidence-based treatment and harm reduction strategy. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract Background Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and transmission of blood-borne viruses like HIV and HCV among people that use opioids. Yet, MMT’s use of restrictive take-home dose policies that force most patients to attend their clinic on a daily, or near-daily, basis may be unpopular with many patients and lead to low rates of treatment uptake and retention. In response, this article examines how clinics’ take-home dosing policies have affected patients’ experiences of treatment and lives in general. Methods This article is based on semi-structured, qualitative interviews with a variety of stakeholders in MMT. Interviews explored: reasons for engaging with, or not engaging with MMT; how MMT is conceptualized by patients and treatment providers (e.g., as harm reduction or route to abstinence and/or recovery); experiences with MMT; perception of barriers to MMT (e.g., organizational/regulatory, social) and how MMT might be improved to support peoples’ substance use treatment needs and goals. Results Nearly all of the patients with past or present MMT use were highly critical of the limited access to take-home doses and consequent need for daily or near daily clinic attendance. Participants described how the use of restrictive take-home dose policies negatively impacted their ability to meet day-to-day responsibilities and also cited the need for daily attendance as a reason for quitting or avoiding OAT. Responses also demonstrate how such policies contribute to an environment of cruelty and stigma within many clinics that exposes this already-stigmatized population to additional trauma. Conclusions Take-home dose policies in MMT are not working for a substantial number of patients and are reasonably seen by participants as degrading and dehumanizing. Revision of MMT regulations and policies regarding take home doses are essential to improve patient satisfaction and the quality and effectiveness of MMT as a key evidence-based treatment and harm reduction strategy. Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and transmission of blood-borne viruses like HIV and HCV among people that use opioids. Yet, MMT's use of restrictive take-home dose policies that force most patients to attend their clinic on a daily, or near-daily, basis may be unpopular with many patients and lead to low rates of treatment uptake and retention. In response, this article examines how clinics' take-home dosing policies have affected patients' experiences of treatment and lives in general. This article is based on semi-structured, qualitative interviews with a variety of stakeholders in MMT. Interviews explored: reasons for engaging with, or not engaging with MMT; how MMT is conceptualized by patients and treatment providers (e.g., as harm reduction or route to abstinence and/or recovery); experiences with MMT; perception of barriers to MMT (e.g., organizational/regulatory, social) and how MMT might be improved to support peoples' substance use treatment needs and goals. Nearly all of the patients with past or present MMT use were highly critical of the limited access to take-home doses and consequent need for daily or near daily clinic attendance. Participants described how the use of restrictive take-home dose policies negatively impacted their ability to meet day-to-day responsibilities and also cited the need for daily attendance as a reason for quitting or avoiding OAT. Responses also demonstrate how such policies contribute to an environment of cruelty and stigma within many clinics that exposes this already-stigmatized population to additional trauma. Take-home dose policies in MMT are not working for a substantial number of patients and are reasonably seen by participants as degrading and dehumanizing. Revision of MMT regulations and policies regarding take home doses are essential to improve patient satisfaction and the quality and effectiveness of MMT as a key evidence-based treatment and harm reduction strategy. Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and transmission of blood-borne viruses like HIV and HCV among people that use opioids. Yet, MMT's use of restrictive take-home dose policies that force most patients to attend their clinic on a daily, or near-daily, basis may be unpopular with many patients and lead to low rates of treatment uptake and retention. In response, this article examines how clinics' take-home dosing policies have affected patients' experiences of treatment and lives in general.BACKGROUNDMethadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and transmission of blood-borne viruses like HIV and HCV among people that use opioids. Yet, MMT's use of restrictive take-home dose policies that force most patients to attend their clinic on a daily, or near-daily, basis may be unpopular with many patients and lead to low rates of treatment uptake and retention. In response, this article examines how clinics' take-home dosing policies have affected patients' experiences of treatment and lives in general.This article is based on semi-structured, qualitative interviews with a variety of stakeholders in MMT. Interviews explored: reasons for engaging with, or not engaging with MMT; how MMT is conceptualized by patients and treatment providers (e.g., as harm reduction or route to abstinence and/or recovery); experiences with MMT; perception of barriers to MMT (e.g., organizational/regulatory, social) and how MMT might be improved to support peoples' substance use treatment needs and goals.METHODSThis article is based on semi-structured, qualitative interviews with a variety of stakeholders in MMT. Interviews explored: reasons for engaging with, or not engaging with MMT; how MMT is conceptualized by patients and treatment providers (e.g., as harm reduction or route to abstinence and/or recovery); experiences with MMT; perception of barriers to MMT (e.g., organizational/regulatory, social) and how MMT might be improved to support peoples' substance use treatment needs and goals.Nearly all of the patients with past or present MMT use were highly critical of the limited access to take-home doses and consequent need for daily or near daily clinic attendance. Participants described how the use of restrictive take-home dose policies negatively impacted their ability to meet day-to-day responsibilities and also cited the need for daily attendance as a reason for quitting or avoiding OAT. Responses also demonstrate how such policies contribute to an environment of cruelty and stigma within many clinics that exposes this already-stigmatized population to additional trauma.RESULTSNearly all of the patients with past or present MMT use were highly critical of the limited access to take-home doses and consequent need for daily or near daily clinic attendance. Participants described how the use of restrictive take-home dose policies negatively impacted their ability to meet day-to-day responsibilities and also cited the need for daily attendance as a reason for quitting or avoiding OAT. Responses also demonstrate how such policies contribute to an environment of cruelty and stigma within many clinics that exposes this already-stigmatized population to additional trauma.Take-home dose policies in MMT are not working for a substantial number of patients and are reasonably seen by participants as degrading and dehumanizing. Revision of MMT regulations and policies regarding take home doses are essential to improve patient satisfaction and the quality and effectiveness of MMT as a key evidence-based treatment and harm reduction strategy.CONCLUSIONSTake-home dose policies in MMT are not working for a substantial number of patients and are reasonably seen by participants as degrading and dehumanizing. Revision of MMT regulations and policies regarding take home doses are essential to improve patient satisfaction and the quality and effectiveness of MMT as a key evidence-based treatment and harm reduction strategy. Background Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and transmission of blood-borne viruses like HIV and HCV among people that use opioids. Yet, MMT's use of restrictive take-home dose policies that force most patients to attend their clinic on a daily, or near-daily, basis may be unpopular with many patients and lead to low rates of treatment uptake and retention. In response, this article examines how clinics' take-home dosing policies have affected patients' experiences of treatment and lives in general. Methods This article is based on semi-structured, qualitative interviews with a variety of stakeholders in MMT. Interviews explored: reasons for engaging with, or not engaging with MMT; how MMT is conceptualized by patients and treatment providers (e.g., as harm reduction or route to abstinence and/or recovery); experiences with MMT; perception of barriers to MMT (e.g., organizational/regulatory, social) and how MMT might be improved to support peoples' substance use treatment needs and goals. Results Nearly all of the patients with past or present MMT use were highly critical of the limited access to take-home doses and consequent need for daily or near daily clinic attendance. Participants described how the use of restrictive take-home dose policies negatively impacted their ability to meet day-to-day responsibilities and also cited the need for daily attendance as a reason for quitting or avoiding OAT. Responses also demonstrate how such policies contribute to an environment of cruelty and stigma within many clinics that exposes this already-stigmatized population to additional trauma. Conclusions Take-home dose policies in MMT are not working for a substantial number of patients and are reasonably seen by participants as degrading and dehumanizing. Revision of MMT regulations and policies regarding take home doses are essential to improve patient satisfaction and the quality and effectiveness of MMT as a key evidence-based treatment and harm reduction strategy. Keywords: Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT), Take-home doses, Methadone clinics, Harm reduction, Patients' rights, Stigma Background Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and transmission of blood-borne viruses like HIV and HCV among people that use opioids. Yet, MMT’s use of restrictive take-home dose policies that force most patients to attend their clinic on a daily, or near-daily, basis may be unpopular with many patients and lead to low rates of treatment uptake and retention. In response, this article examines how clinics’ take-home dosing policies have affected patients’ experiences of treatment and lives in general. Methods This article is based on semi-structured, qualitative interviews with a variety of stakeholders in MMT. Interviews explored: reasons for engaging with, or not engaging with MMT; how MMT is conceptualized by patients and treatment providers (e.g., as harm reduction or route to abstinence and/or recovery); experiences with MMT; perception of barriers to MMT (e.g., organizational/regulatory, social) and how MMT might be improved to support peoples’ substance use treatment needs and goals. Results Nearly all of the patients with past or present MMT use were highly critical of the limited access to take-home doses and consequent need for daily or near daily clinic attendance. Participants described how the use of restrictive take-home dose policies negatively impacted their ability to meet day-to-day responsibilities and also cited the need for daily attendance as a reason for quitting or avoiding OAT. Responses also demonstrate how such policies contribute to an environment of cruelty and stigma within many clinics that exposes this already-stigmatized population to additional trauma. Conclusions Take-home dose policies in MMT are not working for a substantial number of patients and are reasonably seen by participants as degrading and dehumanizing. Revision of MMT regulations and policies regarding take home doses are essential to improve patient satisfaction and the quality and effectiveness of MMT as a key evidence-based treatment and harm reduction strategy. Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and transmission of blood-borne viruses like HIV and HCV among people that use opioids. Yet, MMT's use of restrictive take-home dose policies that force most patients to attend their clinic on a daily, or near-daily, basis may be unpopular with many patients and lead to low rates of treatment uptake and retention. In response, this article examines how clinics' take-home dosing policies have affected patients' experiences of treatment and lives in general. This article is based on semi-structured, qualitative interviews with a variety of stakeholders in MMT. Interviews explored: reasons for engaging with, or not engaging with MMT; how MMT is conceptualized by patients and treatment providers (e.g., as harm reduction or route to abstinence and/or recovery); experiences with MMT; perception of barriers to MMT (e.g., organizational/regulatory, social) and how MMT might be improved to support peoples' substance use treatment needs and goals. Nearly all of the patients with past or present MMT use were highly critical of the limited access to take-home doses and consequent need for daily or near daily clinic attendance. Participants described how the use of restrictive take-home dose policies negatively impacted their ability to meet day-to-day responsibilities and also cited the need for daily attendance as a reason for quitting or avoiding OAT. Responses also demonstrate how such policies contribute to an environment of cruelty and stigma within many clinics that exposes this already-stigmatized population to additional trauma. Take-home dose policies in MMT are not working for a substantial number of patients and are reasonably seen by participants as degrading and dehumanizing. Revision of MMT regulations and policies regarding take home doses are essential to improve patient satisfaction and the quality and effectiveness of MMT as a key evidence-based treatment and harm reduction strategy. |
ArticleNumber | 88 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Mateu-Gelabert, Pedro Frank, David Curran, Laura Walters, Suzan M. Guarino, Honoria Perlman, David C. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: David orcidid: 0000-0003-3304-3237 surname: Frank fullname: Frank, David – sequence: 2 givenname: Pedro surname: Mateu-Gelabert fullname: Mateu-Gelabert, Pedro – sequence: 3 givenname: David C. surname: Perlman fullname: Perlman, David C. – sequence: 4 givenname: Suzan M. surname: Walters fullname: Walters, Suzan M. – sequence: 5 givenname: Laura surname: Curran fullname: Curran, Laura – sequence: 6 givenname: Honoria surname: Guarino fullname: Guarino, Honoria |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34391436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kstuEzEYhUeoiF7gBVggS2zKYoovY88MC6Sq4hKpEZuwtjz2P4nTGTsdz1TKLmuegErwcnkSnKRUSYWQF759_7GPfU6TI-cdJMlrgi8IKcT7QGjJsxRTkmLMGU-Xz5ITkuV5mnOSH-2Nj5PTEOYYR54VL5JjlrGSZEycJD_Wq1-jfr26D6ixN4DWq5-NvR2sQTPljB7qOqxXvz-gyQwQ1DXoPiBfo17dQDrzLSDjg3VTtPCN1RbipkNj6GfKxLuisbKuB6ecBjTpQPUtuB6dj8eTd2ihehtnUf4-Hn0H4WXyvFZNgFcP_Vny_fOnydXX9Prbl9HV5XWquWB9yqGoqQGgpdBQGcA4mqG0yinFVFQFLUxJmRbC5JnAwIFnGcc1w0VZ6UpjdpaMdrrGq7lcdLZV3VJ6ZeV2wXdTqbre6gZkiXNijGKY1GWGuVAFFwZjgWlVMMNV1Pq401oMVQtGR0Odag5ED3ecncmpv5MFExnDeRQ4fxDo_O0AoZetDRqaRjnwQ5CUC1JSTAoS0bdP0LkfOhefakNRwVgu9qipigasq308V29E5aXIKcNZudW6-AcVm4HW6vh1tY3rBwVv9o0-OvybpAjQHaA7H0IH9SNCsNzEVe7iKmNc5TauchmLiidF2vYxF37zWLb5X-kfWWTyHQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_jhm_13138 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_focus_2023_100102 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jadohealth_2022_08_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_josat_2022_208946 crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_24_00705 crossref_primary_10_1177_29767342241288981 crossref_primary_10_1097_jnr_0000000000000619 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2024_116683 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_josat_2023_209086 crossref_primary_10_1080_00952990_2023_2222336 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forsciint_2023_111579 crossref_primary_10_1177_00220426241269828 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2023_104032 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsat_2022_108801 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13722_022_00303_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_focus_2023_100177 crossref_primary_10_1080_01459740_2022_2133706 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2024_116708 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dadr_2022_100052 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12954_023_00896_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_josat_2024_209491 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2023_1201967 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2022_109459 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2024_104425 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2024_104420 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12954_023_00785_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2023_111036 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2022_071467 crossref_primary_10_1080_16066359_2023_2292593 crossref_primary_10_1177_29767342241255480 crossref_primary_10_2196_69829 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_022_07817_6 crossref_primary_10_1080_09687637_2022_2102461 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_josat_2024_209538 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12954_022_00623_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11606_022_07939_x crossref_primary_10_1186_s12954_025_01179_y crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20054455 crossref_primary_10_1016_S2468_2667_23_00023_3 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12954_024_01029_3 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13722_024_00458_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_pharmaceutics14020461 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tranpol_2024_08_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2023_109893 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12954_023_00893_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2025_104749 crossref_primary_10_1080_10428232_2025_2459993 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_12_059 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2025_104746 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2024_095198 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2023_104141 crossref_primary_10_1097_HJH_0000000000003840 crossref_primary_10_1111_add_70008 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2024_51988 crossref_primary_10_1111_add_16160 crossref_primary_10_1177_29767342251324325 crossref_primary_10_1093_aje_kwac217 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_josat_2023_209160 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2022_109703 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hsr_2024_100195 crossref_primary_10_62401_2531_4122_2024_19 crossref_primary_10_1002_jhm_13329 crossref_primary_10_1080_10550887_2023_2212544 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2023_104075 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2022_109497 crossref_primary_10_1080_10550887_2023_2237394 crossref_primary_10_1001_jama_2022_1271 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssmqr_2023_100298 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2023_104123 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2024_104343 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12954_025_01165_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2023_104120 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4144150 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_josat_2024_209616 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsat_2022_108896 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20021526 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13722_023_00402_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12954_022_00671_z crossref_primary_10_1080_00952990_2024_2360984 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0286859 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13011_023_00525_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2022_103768 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2022_103644 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_068729 crossref_primary_10_1177_00914509241310745 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13722_024_00501_6 crossref_primary_10_2147_SAR_S484831 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2023_104058 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_023_09959_7 crossref_primary_10_12688_hrbopenres_14044_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2022_103752 crossref_primary_10_1002_jmv_29784 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2021_103573 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_023_09558_6 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12954_024_01008_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_josat_2023_209055 crossref_primary_10_1080_10826084_2022_2064509 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2024_104487 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_023_01281_4 crossref_primary_10_5694_mja2_52628 crossref_primary_10_1080_00909882_2023_2180770 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0283979 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2012.12004.x 10.15585/mmwr.mm6634a3 10.1080/10826084.2017.1310247 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108074 10.1023/A:1005574918294 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 10.3109/16066359808993303 10.4135/9781849208574.n4 10.1016/j.colegn.2018.01.002 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3182584772 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.10.005 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000685 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.07.006 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108449 10.15585/mmwr.mm6643e1 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102844 10.1080/10826084.2018.1555597 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301049 10.5617/jea.6737 10.1371/journal.pone.0104275 10.1016/0376-8716(96)01240-9 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181e6ad48 10.15585/mmwr.mm6526a2 10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.10.003 10.1136/bmj.j1550 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108276 10.1037/cou0000203 10.3389/fsoc.2021.619677 10.2307/799624 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.29 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.05.021 10.1001/jama.2015.10345 10.1007/s10461-020-02887-1 10.1515/9780804764025 10.1080/08964289.2019.1619511 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108223 10.1186/s12910-016-0108-2 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001233 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2021 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BHPHI CCPQU COVID DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. M0S M1P PATMY PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PYCSY 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12954-021-00535-y |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection (NC LIVE) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Environmental Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Environmental Science Collection MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Open Access Full Text |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Social Welfare & Social Work Public Health |
EISSN | 1477-7517 |
EndPage | 10 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_9071dda301f94056a856d00602b83d5a PMC8364307 A672304981 34391436 10_1186_s12954_021_00535_y |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GeographicLocations | United States United States--US New York City New York |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States – name: New York City New York – name: United States--US |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NIDA NIH HHS grantid: R01 DA041298 – fundername: NIDA NIH HHS grantid: R01 DA041501 – fundername: NIDA NIH HHS grantid: P30 DA011041 – fundername: NIDA NIH HHS grantid: T32 DA007233 – fundername: NIDA NIH HHS grantid: K01 DA053159 – fundername: ; – fundername: ; grantid: #5T32 DA007233-35; R01DA041298; R01DA041501 – fundername: ; grantid: NOH P30 DA011041 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29I 2WC 2XV 53G 5GY 5VS 7X7 7XC 88E 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABIVO ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIHN ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS ATCPS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR IPY ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PATMY PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PYCSY RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW XSB ~8M CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PMFND 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC COVID DWQXO GNUQQ K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-5e8f2dee296cebde0043922b722026b828d923c66d7460e5e54450f3089bcbc03 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1477-7517 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:22 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:12:37 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 03:14:01 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 22:27:47 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:36:21 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:37:59 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:05:31 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:46:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:30 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Harm reduction Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) Patients’ rights Methadone clinics Stigma Take-home doses |
Language | English |
License | 2021. The Author(s). Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c563t-5e8f2dee296cebde0043922b722026b828d923c66d7460e5e54450f3089bcbc03 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-3304-3237 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12954-021-00535-y |
PMID | 34391436 |
PQID | 2562633761 |
PQPubID | 105462 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9071dda301f94056a856d00602b83d5a pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8364307 proquest_miscellaneous_2561920181 proquest_journals_2562633761 gale_infotracmisc_A672304981 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A672304981 pubmed_primary_34391436 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12954_021_00535_y crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12954_021_00535_y |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-08-14 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-08-14 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2021 text: 2021-08-14 day: 14 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Harm reduction journal |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Harm Reduct J |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | CB Fisher (535_CR30) 2008; 30 535_CR7 PP Pani (535_CR18) 1996; 41 PP Pani (535_CR19) 2000; 2 535_CR22 535_CR21 JK O’Donnell (535_CR52) 2017; 66 M Harris (535_CR47) 2013; 24 GR Gibbs (535_CR28) 2007; 703 B Saloner (535_CR8) 2015; 314 535_CR25 535_CR24 J Jaiswal (535_CR31) 2019; 45 KM Peavy (535_CR23) 2020; 24 R Daniulaityte (535_CR53) 2017; 66 535_CR33 H Keane (535_CR40) 2009; 20 J Gryczynski (535_CR45) 2013; 22 AY Walley (535_CR16) 2012; 6 I Etikan (535_CR26) 2016; 5 D Frank (535_CR43) 2020; 83 535_CR38 D Frank (535_CR9) 2018; 53 535_CR37 535_CR35 H Joseph (535_CR55) 2000; 67 E Peles (535_CR10) 2011; 5 AE Butler (535_CR27) 2018; 25 P Conrad (535_CR41) 1992; 18 ML DeVault (535_CR36) 1996; 22 P Conrad (535_CR42) 1975; 23 535_CR44 CA Latkin (535_CR51) 2019; 54 535_CR49 S Amiri (535_CR20) 2018; 93 R Cheng (535_CR12) 2009 CM Jones (535_CR50) 2016; 65 D Frank (535_CR29) 2021; 6 AJ Saxon (535_CR46) 1998; 6 D Frank (535_CR15) 2019; 3 535_CR11 B Moradi (535_CR34) 2017; 64 535_CR54 535_CR1 535_CR2 L Degenhardt (535_CR4) 2009; 105 535_CR3 535_CR5 D Eddie (535_CR13) 2019; 10 535_CR6 P Bourgois (535_CR39) 2000; 24 535_CR17 R Souleymanov (535_CR32) 2016; 17 535_CR14 TJ Cicero (535_CR48) 2005; 293 |
References_xml | – volume: 22 start-page: 285 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 535_CR45 publication-title: Am J Addict doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2012.12004.x – volume: 66 start-page: 904 issue: 34 year: 2017 ident: 535_CR53 publication-title: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6634a3 – ident: 535_CR35 – volume-title: Engaging people with lived experience for better health outcomes: collaboration with mental health and addiction service users in research, policy, and treatment year: 2009 ident: 535_CR12 – volume: 53 start-page: 311 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 535_CR9 publication-title: Subst Use Misuse doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1310247 – ident: 535_CR7 – volume: 10 start-page: 1052 year: 2019 ident: 535_CR13 publication-title: Front Psychol doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052 – ident: 535_CR25 doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108074 – volume: 24 start-page: 165 issue: 2 year: 2000 ident: 535_CR39 publication-title: Cult Med Psychiatry doi: 10.1023/A:1005574918294 – volume: 67 start-page: 347 issue: 5–6 year: 2000 ident: 535_CR55 publication-title: Mt Sinai J Med New York – volume: 5 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 535_CR26 publication-title: Am J Theor Appl Stat doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 – volume: 6 start-page: 203 issue: 3 year: 1998 ident: 535_CR46 publication-title: Addict Res doi: 10.3109/16066359808993303 – volume: 703 start-page: 38 year: 2007 ident: 535_CR28 publication-title: Analyzing Qual Data doi: 10.4135/9781849208574.n4 – ident: 535_CR21 – volume: 25 start-page: 561 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 535_CR27 publication-title: Collegian doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2018.01.002 – ident: 535_CR44 – volume: 6 start-page: 186 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: 535_CR16 publication-title: J Addict Med doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3182584772 – volume: 20 start-page: 450 issue: 5 year: 2009 ident: 535_CR40 publication-title: Int J Drug Policy doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.10.005 – ident: 535_CR24 doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000685 – volume: 93 start-page: 26 year: 2018 ident: 535_CR20 publication-title: J Subst Abuse Treat doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.07.006 – ident: 535_CR22 doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108449 – volume: 66 start-page: 1197 issue: 43 year: 2017 ident: 535_CR52 publication-title: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6643e1 – volume: 83 start-page: 102844 year: 2020 ident: 535_CR43 publication-title: International Journal of Drug Policy. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102844 – volume: 54 start-page: 998 issue: 6 year: 2019 ident: 535_CR51 publication-title: Subst Use Misuse doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1555597 – ident: 535_CR3 doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301049 – volume: 3 start-page: 1 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 535_CR15 publication-title: J Extreme Anthropol doi: 10.5617/jea.6737 – ident: 535_CR38 – volume: 293 start-page: 293 issue: 3 year: 2005 ident: 535_CR48 publication-title: JAMA – ident: 535_CR54 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104275 – ident: 535_CR49 – volume: 41 start-page: 81 issue: 1 year: 1996 ident: 535_CR18 publication-title: Drug Alcohol Depend doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(96)01240-9 – volume: 5 start-page: 92 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 535_CR10 publication-title: J Addict Med doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181e6ad48 – volume: 65 start-page: 667 issue: 26 year: 2016 ident: 535_CR50 publication-title: Morb Mortal Wkly Rep doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6526a2 – volume: 30 start-page: 1 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: 535_CR30 publication-title: IRB – ident: 535_CR33 – volume: 24 start-page: e43 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: 535_CR47 publication-title: Int J Drug Policy doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.10.003 – ident: 535_CR1 doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1550 – ident: 535_CR11 doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108276 – ident: 535_CR14 – ident: 535_CR5 – volume: 64 start-page: 500 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 535_CR34 publication-title: J Couns Psychol doi: 10.1037/cou0000203 – volume: 6 start-page: 6 year: 2021 ident: 535_CR29 publication-title: Front Sociol doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.619677 – volume: 2 start-page: 33 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 535_CR19 publication-title: Heroin Addict Relat Clin Probl – volume: 23 start-page: 12 issue: 1 year: 1975 ident: 535_CR42 publication-title: Soc Probl doi: 10.2307/799624 – volume: 22 start-page: 29 issue: 1 year: 1996 ident: 535_CR36 publication-title: Ann Rev Sociol doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.29 – volume: 105 start-page: 9 issue: 1–2 year: 2009 ident: 535_CR4 publication-title: Drug Alcohol Depend doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.05.021 – ident: 535_CR2 – volume: 314 start-page: 1515 issue: 14 year: 2015 ident: 535_CR8 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10345 – volume: 24 start-page: 2469 issue: 9 year: 2020 ident: 535_CR23 publication-title: AIDS Behav doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02887-1 – ident: 535_CR37 doi: 10.1515/9780804764025 – volume: 45 start-page: 79 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 535_CR31 publication-title: Behav Med doi: 10.1080/08964289.2019.1619511 – ident: 535_CR6 – ident: 535_CR17 doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108223 – volume: 17 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 535_CR32 publication-title: BMC Med Ethics doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0108-2 – volume: 18 start-page: 209 issue: 1 year: 1992 ident: 535_CR41 publication-title: Ann Rev Sociol doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001233 |
SSID | ssj0029538 |
Score | 2.5657752 |
Snippet | Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and transmission of... Background Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and transmission... Abstract Background Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing risk of overdose, arrest, and... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 88 |
SubjectTerms | Clinics Coronaviruses COVID-19 Disease transmission Dosage Drug dosages Drug use Harm reduction HIV Human immunodeficiency virus Humans Maintenance Marginalized groups Medical research Methadone Methadone - therapeutic use Methadone clinics Methadone maintenance Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) Methods Narcotics Opiate Substitution Treatment Opioid-Related Disorders - drug therapy Opioids Overdose Patient outcomes Patient satisfaction Patients Patients’ rights Policies Policy Public health Retention Risk management Risk reduction Stigma Substance use Take-home doses Trauma |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Open Access Full Text dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELbQnrgg3gS6yEiIh5C1iZM4DrcFsVqQyqkr9mbF9lit2k2gTVfaW8_8AlaCP9dfwjiPqhESXDg246R2Zsb-Jp75TMjzxGahEUYzk0c5S7SMWQFRxLi0NsOf0kS-OHn8WZyeJZ_O0_O9o758TlhLD9y-uCMM3iJrC7RDlyO4EIVMhfUsIhyfa9MGGuGa1wdTXaiVox_3JTJSHK0iv53FfDpCQ2jCrgbLUMPW_-ecvLcoDRMm91agk9vkVgcd6XHb5TvkBpR3yaitr6VfYOGKJdAXtL9QLef3yPft5ufHeru5XtHFbA50u_mxmH1bzyz1X8zN2rnVdvPrLUVroV1qB60crYs5sGl1AdRW_mMC9Wc54CyAwpKOoZ4WtiqBjgvPNuEpO4BO-ox1-mo8nrymHWErPv4a__oSVvfJ2cmHyftT1h2_wEwq4pqlIB23ADwXBrQFv2mYc64zzjFw0xiqWUSHRghUqgghBc_rE7o4lLk22oTxA3JQYmceEaqdQZjloEgcT2QOMgPBc5Np0FlhnQ1I1GtDmY6b3B-RsVBNjCKFajWoUIOq0aC6Csib3T1fW2aOv7Z-55W8a-lZtZsLaGuqszX1L1sLyEtvIsr7PnbPFF0JAw7Ss2ipY5E125YyCsho0BJ91gzFvZGpbs5YKQSfXMQ44aP42U7s7_R5cCVU66YNQnJPshaQh61N7oYU-yLqJBYByQbWOhjzUFLOpg2juIwRmIbZ4__xkp6Qm7xxNMmiZEQO6uUaDhG41fpp46O_AXvhQ0w priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection (NC LIVE) dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagXJAQgvIKLMhIiIdQ1MRJHIcLKoiqIC2nrejNSuwJu9olaTdZpN72zC-gEvy5_SXM5LFthNRjYjuxNQ-PxzPfMPYitLFnpMlck_iJG2YqcFPwfVcoa2N8VMan5OTxV3l4FH45jo47h1vVhVX2OrFR1LY05CPfw61ZyADFwX9_cupS1Si6Xe1KaFxnNwi6jLg6Pr44cCUozX2ijJJ7lU-XWi4FJTSwJu7ZYDNqMPv_18yXtqZh2OSlfejgDrvdGZB8v6X4XXYNil12q_W-8TapaJeN2qxb_g0WeboE_pL3L8rl_B77tVn_-Vxv1ucVX8zmwDfr34vZ6WpmOfnRzSrPq8367zuOPMS7gA9e5rxO5-BOyx_AbUkuBk4VHlA3YGPBx1BPU1sWwMcpYVAQkAfwSR_Hzl-Px5M3vINxxc-f469_QnWfHR18mnw8dLuiDK6JZFC7EahcWACRSAOZBbpKTITIYiHwOJfhAc6izWikRFJLDyIgtB8vDzyVZCYzXvCA7RQ4mUeMZ7lB4yuHNMxFqBJQMUiRmDiDLE5tbh3m99TRpkMsp8IZC92cXJTULUU1UlQ3FNVnDnu7HXPS4nVc2fsDEX3bk7C2mxfl8rvuRFcnaIVZm6ImzBM0b2WqImkJx0YgZ9soddgrYhlNGgGnZ9IusQEXSdhael_GzWWm8h02GvRESTbD5p7pdKdJKn3B9w57vm2mkRQdV0C5avqgoU7Qaw572PLodkkBpVaHgXRYPODewZqHLcVs2uCMqwDNVS9-fPW0nrCbohEp5frhiO3UyxU8RUOtzp410vgPEElA6Q priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | “It’s like ‘liquid handcuffs”: The effects of take-home dosing policies on Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) patients’ lives |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34391436 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2562633761 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2561920181 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8364307 https://doaj.org/article/9071dda301f94056a856d00602b83d5a |
Volume | 18 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELb2ceGCeBMolZEQD6FA4iS2g4RQF-1qWSkrBK3ozUpsh1YtCdumiN565hewEvy5_hLGblJtxIoTp6iZcRpnZuyxPfMNQo9CxTxJZebK2I_dMOOBm2rfdwlXisFPLn2TnJyc0uNBeDKMhjuoKXdUf8D5pUs7U09qMJu--H62fAMG_9oaPKcv5745rHJNsIGFK3GXu2gfZiZmKhok4fZUAbgC3iTOXNquNTlZDP-_R-oLU1U7jPLCvHR0DV2tHUrc22jAdbSjixuos8m6xZ_0NE9nGj_GzY1yNrmJfqxXv95V69X5HE_HE43Xq5_T8dlirLDZR5eLPJ-vV79fYdAhXAd84DLHVTrR7qj8orEqzRYDNhUeYGwAYoETXY1SVRYaJ6nBoDBAHhr3mzh2_DRJ-s9wDeMKjz-Hv_6m57fQ4Oiw__bYrYsyuDKiQeVGmudEaU1iKnWmtDlKjAnJGCGwnMtgAafAZ5SUgqippyNt0H68PPB4nMlMesFttFfAy9xFOMslOF-5TsOchDzWnGlKYskynbFU5cpBfiMNIWvEclM4YyrsyoVTsZGgAAkKK0GxdNDzbZuvG7yOf3IfGCFvOQ3Wtr1Rzj6L2nRFDF6YUimMhHkM7i1NeUSVwbEhoNkqSh30xKiIMDoKryfTOrEBOmmwtUSPMnuYyX0HdVqcYMmyTW6UTDSGIMAlJTSAaQDID7dk09JExxW6XFgecNQN9JqD7mx0ctulwKRWhwF1EGtpa6vPbUoxHlmccR6Au-qxe__jI91HV4g1NO76YQftVbOFfgDuXJV10S4bsi7a7_VOPp7A9eDw9P2Hrt0c6Vr7_QNe2VDP |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKOYCEEJRXoICReApFTZys4yAhVB7VlnZ72qq9mcSe0FWXTbsP0N72zC-gEvwFftT-Emby2DZC6q3HjZ2srXnbM98w9jS0kWekSV0T-7EbpipwE_B9VyhrI_ypjE_FyZ0d2d4NP--39pfY37oWhtIqa51YKGqbGzojX0PTLGSA4uC_Ozp2qWsU3a7WLTRKttiC6Q8M2UZvNz8ifZ8JsfGp-6HtVl0FXNOSwdhtgcqEBRCxNJBaoLuwWIg0EgLjkRQjEItOj5ES1yo9aAHB1XhZ4Kk4NanxAvzuJXYZDa9HwV60fxrgxag96sIcJddGPl2iuZQEUcCouNOG8St6BPxvCc6Ywmaa5hm7t3GDXa8cVr5ecthNtgSDFXatPO3jZRHTClstq3z5HvSzZAj8Oa8f5MPDW-znfPZ7czyfnYx4v3cIfD771e8dT3qW07m9mWTZaD7784Yjz_IqwYTnGR8nh-Ae5N-A25yONDh1lEBdhIMD3oHxQWLzAfBOQpgXBBwCvFvnzfOXnU73Fa9gY_HzJ_jX32F0m-1eCLnusOUBLuYe42lm0NnLIAkzEaoYVARSxCZKIY0Sm1mH-TV1tKkQ0qlRR18XkZKSuqSoRorqgqJ66rDXi3eOSnyQc2e_J6IvZhK2d_EgH37VlarQMXp91iaoebMY3WmZqJa0hJsjUJJsK3HYC2IZTRoIl2eSqpACN0lYXnpdRsXlqfIdttqYiZrDNIdrptOV5hrpUzlz2JPFML1J2XgDyCfFHAwMCOrNYXdLHl1sKaBS7jCQDosa3NvYc3Nk0DsocM1VgO6xF90_f1mP2ZV2t7Ottzd3th6wq6IQL-X64SpbHg8n8BCdxHH6qJBMzr5ctCr4B9qbfMo |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CIt%E2%80%99s+like+%E2%80%98liquid+handcuffs%E2%80%9D%3A+The+effects+of+take-home+dosing+policies+on+Methadone+Maintenance+Treatment+%28MMT%29+patients%E2%80%99+lives&rft.jtitle=Harm+reduction+journal&rft.au=David+Frank&rft.au=Pedro+Mateu-Gelabert&rft.au=David+C.+Perlman&rft.au=Suzan+M.+Walters&rft.date=2021-08-14&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1477-7517&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12954-021-00535-y&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_9071dda301f94056a856d00602b83d5a |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1477-7517&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1477-7517&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1477-7517&client=summon |