Refugee blues: a UK and European perspective

• Published in: European journal of psychotraumatology Vol. 6; no. 1; p. 29328
• Main Author: Turner, Stuart
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Taylor & Francis 28.10.2015; Taylor & Francis Ltd; Co-Action Publishing; Taylor & Francis Group
• Subjects: Asylum; Colleges & universities; Conflicts of interest; Conventions; Decision making; deterrence; Funding; Human rights; Immigration; Mental health; Political asylum; Proceedings Paper; Protocol; Refugees; Smuggling; Trauma; University colleges; United Kingdom > UK; Western Europe; deterrence; refugees; Asylum; decision making
• DOI: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.29328
• ISSN: 2000-8066

In this paper, the numbers of refugees travelling to the European Union are set in a global context. It is argued that the increasing restrictions placed on asylum seekers from the 1980s onwards in the UK and the associated culture of deterrence and prohibition have had the perverse effect of supporting the economic market for people smuggling. It appears that these restrictions were initially designed to deter people, most of whom would have been granted humanitarian assistance had they managed to arrive in the UK, so as to prevent them from accessing the decision-making process on asylum. Policy changes concerning travel, benefits, and other pressures on asylum seekers are also considered in the context of deterrence. The problems facing asylum seekers do not end with their arrival in a safe country. The current methods of determining refugee status are alarmingly weak. Indeed there is evidence suggesting that those who are most traumatised before arrival face systematic disadvantage. The focus of this paper is on the United Kingdom but its conclusions apply to most Western European countries. The paper concludes with some tentative suggestions for change.