Influence of cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in an osteoporotic lumbosacral spine over the adjacent segments: a 3D finite element study
To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finit...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 132 - 8 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
07.04.2020
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1749-799X 1749-799X |
DOI | 10.1186/s13018-020-01650-5 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).
A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared.
The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4.
In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Methods A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4–L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3–4 and L5–S1) were compared. Results The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3–4. Conclusion In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration. To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).PURPOSETo compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared.METHODSA normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared.The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4.RESULTSThe validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4.In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration.CONCLUSIONIn general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration. To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared. The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4. In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Purpose To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Methods A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared. Results The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4. Conclusion In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Keywords: Cement-augmented pedicle screw;, Osteoporotic lumbosacral spine;, Adjacent segment;, Finite element study To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared. The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4. In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Abstract Purpose To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Methods A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4–L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3–4 and L5–S1) were compared. Results The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3–4. Conclusion In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration. |
ArticleNumber | 132 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Ding, Zhi-Hui Zeng, Fan-hui Tu, Jian-long Zhou, Quan-kun Dong, Zhang-qing |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Quan-kun surname: Zhou fullname: Zhou, Quan-kun – sequence: 2 givenname: Fan-hui surname: Zeng fullname: Zeng, Fan-hui – sequence: 3 givenname: Jian-long surname: Tu fullname: Tu, Jian-long – sequence: 4 givenname: Zhang-qing surname: Dong fullname: Dong, Zhang-qing – sequence: 5 givenname: Zhi-Hui surname: Ding fullname: Ding, Zhi-Hui |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kstu1DAUhiNURC_wAiyQJTZsUnzJxWGBVJXbSJXYgMTOOrGPpx4l9mAnRX0RnhdnpkXTCqEsnBz__3d0Tv7T4sgHj0XxktFzxmTzNjFBmSwppyVlTU3L-klxwtqqK9uu-3F08H5cnKa0obSmtayeFceC86bqKDspfq-8HWb0GkmwROOIfiphXi8nGrJF4_SAJOmIv4jzaYrzcgWTCz5_E_AkpAnDNsQwOU2GeexDAh1hIGnrfMbeYCTTNRIwG9DZSxLu8OkdASI-EOu8m5DgsGtO0jSb2-fFUwtDwhd351nx_dPHb5dfyquvn1eXF1elrhsxlYJysMit5H0rLFQChdbcUNOCqYyVudShroB1LWssYt9gBaahrah0R60UZ8VqzzUBNmob3QjxVgVwalcIca0gTssKlGVQS6yl7DivjGASrQHGm55Bj33VZ9b7PWs79yOaZdS8hQfQhzfeXat1uFEtE63gTQa8uQPE8HPGNKnRJY3DAB7DnBQXss2_ueY0S18_km7CHH1eVVZ1rKKU1weqNeQBnLch99ULVF00PPfs2qbLqvN_qPJjcHQ6R866XH9geHU46N8J71OVBXIv0DGkFNEq7faRyWQ3KEbVEmC1D7DKAVa7AKs6W_kj6z39P6Y_4dj1yw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11517_022_02625_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s11916_023_01188_1 crossref_primary_10_1088_1757_899X_1206_1_012024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2021_12_105 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_76091 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10237_020_01403_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e26726 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_022_03220_3 crossref_primary_10_4055_jkoa_2024_59_5_370 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_022_02984_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2024_112070 crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2022_978917 crossref_primary_10_1097_BSD_0000000000001757 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2023_1183683 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2023_09_050 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_07463_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00590_024_03849_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2024_01_021 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105377 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318273a2ea 10.1007/s00586-019-05985-4 10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.164 10.1007/s00198-018-4716-1 10.1007/s00586-018-5513-4 10.1371/journal.pone.0200899 10.1007/s00264-018-3812-3 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.5.435 10.3171/2011.7.FOCUS11125 10.3171/2017.3.SPINE161169 10.1186/s13018-018-0733-1 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181894fb1 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.026 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.04.015 10.1097/MD.0000000000006032 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.032 10.1055/s-2008-1039791 10.1080/02688697.2018.1523365 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002710 10.1186/s13018-019-1213-y 10.1371/journal.pone.0166452 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.073 10.1080/10255842.2019.1639047 10.1007/s00586-018-5629-6 10.1007/s11517-018-1844-x 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.001 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000164 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.001 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd. 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2020 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2020 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QP 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s13018-020-01650-5 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1749-799X |
EndPage | 8 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_f1a58e5889224d318efda126b1abeb4b PMC7137326 A627329769 32264901 10_1186_s13018_020_01650_5 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29L 2WC 53G 5GY 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR IPT ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW ~8M CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 3V. 7QP 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-302afe2f82b73fa43e3cc2d0d7ad4df8fa49ec4a19716feeb6e4ad60734c90f83 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1749-799X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:47 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:24:47 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 15:55:14 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 06:59:03 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:25:49 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:39:11 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:07:42 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:17:24 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:07:18 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Finite element study Osteoporotic lumbosacral spine Cement-augmented pedicle screw Adjacent segment |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c563t-302afe2f82b73fa43e3cc2d0d7ad4df8fa49ec4a19716feeb6e4ad60734c90f83 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/f1a58e5889224d318efda126b1abeb4b |
PMID | 32264901 |
PQID | 2391400250 |
PQPubID | 55349 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f1a58e5889224d318efda126b1abeb4b pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7137326 proquest_miscellaneous_2387650520 proquest_journals_2391400250 gale_infotracmisc_A627329769 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A627329769 pubmed_primary_32264901 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13018_020_01650_5 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_020_01650_5 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-04-07 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-04-07 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2020 text: 2020-04-07 day: 07 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Orthop Surg Res |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | 1650_CR9 H Xu (1650_CR20) 2013; 73 KS Tay (1650_CR30) 2016; 16 F Galbusera (1650_CR26) 2015; 24 1650_CR1 1650_CR22 D Liu (1650_CR32) 2016; 16 CS Shim (1650_CR24) 2008; 33 P Korovessis (1650_CR2) 2018; 2018 HZ Guo (1650_CR5) 2019; 28 W Wang (1650_CR3) 2019; 183 WT Zhao (1650_CR23) 2018; 13 K Kobayashi (1650_CR25) 2018; 27 YP Huang (1650_CR21) 2016; 11 GY Mo (1650_CR4) 2019; 14 H Wang (1650_CR29) 2017; 96 Y Peng (1650_CR19) 2018; 56 HH Lin (1650_CR6) 2018; 42 S Okuda (1650_CR11) 2018; 43 JC Wu (1650_CR27) 2011; 31 CH Lee (1650_CR13) 2017; 27 JH Klingler (1650_CR8) 2015; 2015 XP Xia (1650_CR28) 2013; 38 K Wang Md (1650_CR16) 2018; 18 J Ramirez-Villaescusa (1650_CR14) 2019; 33 JM Kim (1650_CR34) 2012; 52 MN Erdem (1650_CR7) 2017; 17 KP Schulitz (1650_CR33) 1996; 134 JZ Yan (1650_CR15) 2009; 89 T Wang (1650_CR17) 2019; 69 JC Lee (1650_CR31) 2014; 39 K Phan (1650_CR10) 2018; 27 MV Rijsbergen (1650_CR12) 2018; 13 BT Allaire (1650_CR18) 2019; 30 |
References_xml | – volume: 183 start-page: 105377 year: 2019 ident: 1650_CR3 publication-title: Clin Neurol Neurosurg. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105377 – volume: 38 start-page: 597 issue: 7 year: 2013 ident: 1650_CR28 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318273a2ea – volume: 28 start-page: 1661 issue: 7 year: 2019 ident: 1650_CR5 publication-title: Eur Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05985-4 – volume: 24 start-page: 1005 issue: 5 year: 2015 ident: 1650_CR26 publication-title: Eur Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6 – ident: 1650_CR22 doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.164 – volume: 30 start-page: 323 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 1650_CR18 publication-title: Osteoporos Int. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4716-1 – volume: 27 start-page: 1698 issue: 8 year: 2018 ident: 1650_CR25 publication-title: Eur Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5513-4 – volume: 13 start-page: e0200899 issue: 8 year: 2018 ident: 1650_CR12 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200899 – volume: 42 start-page: 1313 issue: 6 year: 2018 ident: 1650_CR6 publication-title: Int Orthop doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3812-3 – volume: 52 start-page: 435 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 1650_CR34 publication-title: J Korean Neurosurg Soc doi: 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.5.435 – volume: 31 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 1650_CR27 publication-title: Neurosurg Focus. doi: 10.3171/2011.7.FOCUS11125 – volume: 27 start-page: 643 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: 1650_CR13 publication-title: J Neurosurg Spine. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.SPINE161169 – volume: 73 start-page: ons198 issue: 2 Suppl Operati year: 2013 ident: 1650_CR20 publication-title: Neurosurgery – volume: 13 start-page: 32 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 1650_CR23 publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0733-1 – volume: 33 start-page: E820 issue: 22 year: 2008 ident: 1650_CR24 publication-title: Locker. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181894fb1 – volume: 16 start-page: 182 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 1650_CR30 publication-title: Spine J. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.026 – volume: 16 start-page: 1124 issue: 9 year: 2016 ident: 1650_CR32 publication-title: Spine J doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.04.015 – volume: 2015 start-page: 979186 year: 2015 ident: 1650_CR8 publication-title: Spine J – volume: 96 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 1650_CR29 publication-title: Medicine (Baltimore). doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006032 – volume: 69 start-page: 178 year: 2019 ident: 1650_CR17 publication-title: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.032 – volume: 134 start-page: 171 issue: 2 year: 1996 ident: 1650_CR33 publication-title: Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039791 – volume: 33 start-page: 17 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 1650_CR14 publication-title: Br J Neurosurg. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1523365 – volume: 43 start-page: E1384 issue: 23 year: 2018 ident: 1650_CR11 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002710 – volume: 14 start-page: 170 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 1650_CR4 publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1213-y – volume: 11 start-page: e0166452 issue: 11 year: 2016 ident: 1650_CR21 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166452 – ident: 1650_CR1 doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.073 – volume: 89 start-page: 1162 issue: 17 year: 2009 ident: 1650_CR15 publication-title: Chin Med J – ident: 1650_CR9 doi: 10.1080/10255842.2019.1639047 – volume: 27 start-page: 1981 issue: 8 year: 2018 ident: 1650_CR10 publication-title: Eur Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5629-6 – volume: 56 start-page: 2137 issue: 11 year: 2018 ident: 1650_CR19 publication-title: Med Biol Eng Comput. doi: 10.1007/s11517-018-1844-x – volume: 17 start-page: 328 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 1650_CR7 publication-title: Spine J doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.001 – volume: 39 start-page: E339 issue: 5 year: 2014 ident: 1650_CR31 publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000164 – volume: 2018 start-page: 1623647 year: 2018 ident: 1650_CR2 publication-title: Adv Orthop. – volume: 18 start-page: 2288 issue: 12 year: 2018 ident: 1650_CR16 publication-title: Spine J doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.001 |
SSID | ssj0050584 |
Score | 2.3012445 |
Snippet | To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).
A... Purpose To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration... To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). A... To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration... Abstract Purpose To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 132 |
SubjectTerms | Adjacent segment Adult Biomechanics Bone Cements Cadavers Cartilage Cement Cement-augmented pedicle screw Degeneration Finite Element Analysis Finite element study Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Internal fixation Intervertebral discs Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Male Mathematical models Orthopedics Osteoporosis Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging Osteoporosis - surgery Osteoporotic lumbosacral spine Pedicle Screws Sacrum - diagnostic imaging Sacrum - surgery Spine (lumbar) Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Jb9UwELagXLggEFugICMhcUBWk3iJwwWVpSpIcKLSu1ley6tK8iCt-Cf8XmachUZIPb54kmdnVjsz3xDyUlahkTIoJlolmBAtqJT2JaudiuDNgi0zWPWXr-r4RHzeyM104DZMaZWzTcyGOvQez8gPat7CXgA99tvdT4Zdo_Dr6tRC4ya5hdBlmNLVbJYNFzh3LeZCGa0OBrDXlWa4YcIinpLJlTPKmP3_W-YrrmmdNnnFDx3dJXemAJIejhy_R27E7j7582nuNUL7RH0-8mP28jQjbga6w68x55GCiYi_6TaDxv6Yio46-E1tR7HYo4dgvIfnUrBYrh-sh_-nww4CUYqZnhSCRWrDmcWp0SHmxw9vqKX8A01bjF5pHNPRaYatfUBOjj5-e3_Mpo4LzEvFLxgva5tinXTtGp6s4JF7X4cyNDaIkDRcaqMXtkLgqRQjMFTYoMBMCN-WSfOHZK_ru_iYUNhJlc5zLlRKQJPawJWIkgvHRdKKF6SaX73xExw5dsU4N3lbopUZ2WWAXSazy8iCvF7u2Y1gHNdSv0OOLpQIpJ0v9L9OzaSXJlVW6ii1biGWCWDgYgq2qpWrrItOuIK8QnkwqO4wPW-nqgVYJAJnmUMF8V8NMV1bkP0VJaipXw_PEmUmMzGYf0JdkBfLMN6JqW9d7C-RBhwWthsEmkejAC5L4lgGDRFdQZqVaK7WvB7ptt8ziHhTcZiZenL9tJ6S23XWF8HKZp_sgXjGZxCFXbjnWdX-AjGFMwI priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Jb9UwELZKuXBBILZAQUZC4oAMSbzEQUKoLFVBKiee1JvleCkPPZJH0wr4I_xeZpxFjag4cUw8TrzMmni-IeSJLHwlpVdM1EowIWoQKe1yVjYqgDXzNk9g1Uef1OFKfDyWxztkKnc0LmB_aWiH9aRWp5vnP7__eg0C_yoJvFYvetDDhWYYCGFyTs7kFXIVLFOFgnok5r8KYOy1mBJnLu23ME4Jw_9vTX3BVC2PUV6wSwc3yPXRoaT7AwfcJDuhvUV-f5hqj9AuUpc-ATJ7fpIQOD3d4t-ZTaCgMsIPuk4gst_GJKQWrqltKSZ_dLAuHTyXggZrut46eD_tt-CYUjz5ScF5pNZ_tTg02of0-P4ltZS_o3GN3iwNw_F0mmBsb5PVwfvPbw_ZWIGBOan4GeN5aWMooy6bikcreODOlT73lfXCRw236uCELRCIKoYAGyysV6A2hKvzqPkdstt2bbhHKERWeeM4FypGoIm150oEyUXDRdSKZ6SYlt64EZ4cq2RsTApTtDLDdhnYLpO2y8iMPJv7bAdwjn9Sv8EdnSkRWDvd6E5PzCinJhZW6iC1rsG38aDwQvS2KFVT2CY0osnIU-QHgwwJw3N2zGKASSKQltlX4A-W4OPVGdlbUILYumXzxFFm4npT8hoCXnRLM_J4bsaeeBSuDd050oABw_KDQHN3YMB5ShzTosHDy0i1YM3FnJct7fpLAhWvCg4jU_f_xyI9INfKJFWC5dUe2QUmDg_BdztrHiWB_APRGkOk priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Influence of cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in an osteoporotic lumbosacral spine over the adjacent segments: a 3D finite element study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264901 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2391400250 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2387650520 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7137326 https://doaj.org/article/f1a58e5889224d318efda126b1abeb4b |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELZguXBBIF6BpTISEgdkbRI7jsOtC7taKu0KASv1ZvkJRUtSKbvin_B7mXGSqhESXLi0ajxJbc94Hu3MN4S8qgpfV5WXTDRSMCEaOFLK5ay0MoA18yZPYNXnF_LsUqzW1Xqv1RfmhA3wwMPGHcXCVCpUSjVgbDxIYIjeFKW0hbHBCovaF2zeFEwNOhjMuhJTiYySRz1o6kIxDJWwfCdn1cwMJbT-P3XynlGaJ0zuWaDT--Te6DrS5TDlB-RWaB-SXx-mLiO0i9SlH_uYufmasDY93eL_MFeBgnIIP-kmwcX-GMuNWvhMTUuxzKMDN7yD51LQVbbrjYPvp_0WXFCKOZ4U3ERq_HeDU6N9SI_v31JD-XsaN-i30jAkotMEWPuIXJ6efHl3xsZeC8xVkl8znpcmhjKq0tY8GsEDd670ua-NFz4quNQEJ0yBkFMxBGClMF6CghCuyaPij8lB27XhKaEQQ-XWcS5kjEATG8-lCBUXlouoJM9IMW29diMQOfbDuNIpIFFSD-zSwC6d2KWrjLzZ3bMdYDj-Sn2MHN1RIoR2ugCCpUfB0v8SrIy8RnnQeNBhes6M9QqwSITM0ksJnl8J3lyTkcMZJRxQNx-eJEqPCqLXJW8gtEUHNCMvd8N4Jya9taG7QRowVdhoEGieDAK4WxLHAmjw5TJSz0Rztub5SLv5luDD64LDzOSz_7FJz8ndMp0qwfL6kByAEIcX4KVd2wW5Xa_rBbmzXK4-r-D9-OTi46dFOqbwei7Ub8vmQVI |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbK9gAXBOIVKGAkEAcUNYkdx0FCqKWturRdIdRKvRnHj7KoJAtpVfFH-Bn8RmacZGmE1FuPG0-8dub1TeKZIeRlntoiz62IeSl4zHkJKiVNEmeVcODNrE5CseqDmdg94h-P8-MV8mfIhcFjlYNNDIbaNgbfka9nrIRYAD32-8WPGLtG4dfVoYVGJxZ77tcFhGztu-kW8PdVlu1sH37YjfuuArHJBTuLWZJp7zIvs6pgXnPmmDGZTWyhLbdewqXSGa5TLK7knYNFc20FqAI3ZeIlg3lvkFXOIJSZkNXN7dmnz4PtBzgh-ZCaI8V6Cx4ilTGGaJg2lMT5yP2FLgH_-4JLznB8UPOS59u5Q273kJVudDJ2l6y4-h75PR26m9DGUxNeMsb6_CTU-LR0gd9_Th0Fo-Qu6DyUqf3epznV8JvqmmJ6SQPwv4F5KdjIqmm1gf-n7QKgL8WzpRTgKdX2m8al0daF6du3VFO2Rf0c8TJ13QF4Ggrl3idH18KNB2RSN7V7RCjEbkllGOPCe6DxpWWCu5zxinEvBYtIOjx6ZfoC6NiH41SFQEgK1bFLAbtUYJfKI_Jmec-iK_9xJfUmcnRJiaW7w4Xm54nqLYHyqc6ly6UsAT1ZMKnOW51mokp15SpeReQ1yoNCAwPLM7rPk4BNYqkutSEAcWaAIsuIrI0owTCY8fAgUao3TK36p0YRebEcxjvxsF3tmnOkAReJDQ6B5mEngMstMUy8BgwZkWIkmqM9j0fq-ddQtrxIGaxMPL56Wc_Jzd3Dg321P53tPSG3sqA7PE6KNTIBUXVPAQOeVc96xaPky3Xr-l-ZbnNJ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence+of+cement-augmented+pedicle+screw+instrumentation+in+an+osteoporotic+lumbosacral+spine+over+the+adjacent+segments%3A+a+3D+finite+element+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+orthopaedic+surgery+and+research&rft.au=Quan-kun+Zhou&rft.au=Fan-hui+Zeng&rft.au=Jian-long+Tu&rft.au=Zhang-qing+Dong&rft.date=2020-04-07&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1749-799X&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13018-020-01650-5&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_f1a58e5889224d318efda126b1abeb4b |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon |