Influence of cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in an osteoporotic lumbosacral spine over the adjacent segments: a 3D finite element study

To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 132 - 8
Main Authors Zhou, Quan-kun, Zeng, Fan-hui, Tu, Jian-long, Dong, Zhang-qing, Ding, Zhi-Hui
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 07.04.2020
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1749-799X
1749-799X
DOI10.1186/s13018-020-01650-5

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared. The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4. In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration.
AbstractList Purpose To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Methods A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4–L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3–4 and L5–S1) were compared. Results The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3–4. Conclusion In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration.
To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).PURPOSETo compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared.METHODSA normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared.The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4.RESULTSThe validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4.In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration.CONCLUSIONIn general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration.
To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared. The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4. In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration.
Purpose To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Methods A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared. Results The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4. Conclusion In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Keywords: Cement-augmented pedicle screw;, Osteoporotic lumbosacral spine;, Adjacent segment;, Finite element study
To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4-L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3-4 and L5-S1) were compared. The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3-4. In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration.
Abstract Purpose To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Methods A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. A common pedicle screw model and a cement-augmented pedicle screw model of L4–L5 with fusion and internal fixation were constructed. With ANSYS Workbench 17.0, a 500 N load was applied to the upper surface of L3 to simulate the weight of a human body, and a 7.5 N m moment was applied at the neutral point to simulate flexion, extension, left/right bending, left/right rotation of the spine. The peak von Mises stress of intervertebral disc and the range of motion (ROM) on the adjacent segments (L3–4 and L5–S1) were compared. Results The validity of the intact model shows that the ROM of the model is similar to that of a cadaveric study. Compared with the intact model, CPS model and CAPSI model in all motion patterns increased the ROM of adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc stress and the ROM of adjacent segments were found to be higher in the CAPSI model than in the CPS model, especially in L3–4. Conclusion In general, the biomechanical analysis of an osteoporotic lumbar spine showed that both CPS and CAPSI can increase the ROM and disc stresses of osteoporotic lumbar models, and compared with CPS, CAPSI is more likely to increase the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration.
ArticleNumber 132
Audience Academic
Author Ding, Zhi-Hui
Zeng, Fan-hui
Tu, Jian-long
Zhou, Quan-kun
Dong, Zhang-qing
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Quan-kun
  surname: Zhou
  fullname: Zhou, Quan-kun
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Fan-hui
  surname: Zeng
  fullname: Zeng, Fan-hui
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jian-long
  surname: Tu
  fullname: Tu, Jian-long
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Zhang-qing
  surname: Dong
  fullname: Dong, Zhang-qing
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Zhi-Hui
  surname: Ding
  fullname: Ding, Zhi-Hui
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kstu1DAUhiNURC_wAiyQJTZsUnzJxWGBVJXbSJXYgMTOOrGPpx4l9mAnRX0RnhdnpkXTCqEsnBz__3d0Tv7T4sgHj0XxktFzxmTzNjFBmSwppyVlTU3L-klxwtqqK9uu-3F08H5cnKa0obSmtayeFceC86bqKDspfq-8HWb0GkmwROOIfiphXi8nGrJF4_SAJOmIv4jzaYrzcgWTCz5_E_AkpAnDNsQwOU2GeexDAh1hIGnrfMbeYCTTNRIwG9DZSxLu8OkdASI-EOu8m5DgsGtO0jSb2-fFUwtDwhd351nx_dPHb5dfyquvn1eXF1elrhsxlYJysMit5H0rLFQChdbcUNOCqYyVudShroB1LWssYt9gBaahrah0R60UZ8VqzzUBNmob3QjxVgVwalcIca0gTssKlGVQS6yl7DivjGASrQHGm55Bj33VZ9b7PWs79yOaZdS8hQfQhzfeXat1uFEtE63gTQa8uQPE8HPGNKnRJY3DAB7DnBQXss2_ueY0S18_km7CHH1eVVZ1rKKU1weqNeQBnLch99ULVF00PPfs2qbLqvN_qPJjcHQ6R866XH9geHU46N8J71OVBXIv0DGkFNEq7faRyWQ3KEbVEmC1D7DKAVa7AKs6W_kj6z39P6Y_4dj1yw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s11517_022_02625_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11916_023_01188_1
crossref_primary_10_1088_1757_899X_1206_1_012024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2021_12_105
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_76091
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10237_020_01403_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e26726
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_022_03220_3
crossref_primary_10_4055_jkoa_2024_59_5_370
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_022_02984_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2024_112070
crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2022_978917
crossref_primary_10_1097_BSD_0000000000001757
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2023_1183683
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2023_09_050
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_07463_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00590_024_03849_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spinee_2024_01_021
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105377
10.1097/BRS.0b013e318273a2ea
10.1007/s00586-019-05985-4
10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6
10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.164
10.1007/s00198-018-4716-1
10.1007/s00586-018-5513-4
10.1371/journal.pone.0200899
10.1007/s00264-018-3812-3
10.3340/jkns.2012.52.5.435
10.3171/2011.7.FOCUS11125
10.3171/2017.3.SPINE161169
10.1186/s13018-018-0733-1
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181894fb1
10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.026
10.1016/j.spinee.2016.04.015
10.1097/MD.0000000000006032
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.032
10.1055/s-2008-1039791
10.1080/02688697.2018.1523365
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002710
10.1186/s13018-019-1213-y
10.1371/journal.pone.0166452
10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.073
10.1080/10255842.2019.1639047
10.1007/s00586-018-5629-6
10.1007/s11517-018-1844-x
10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.001
10.1097/BRS.0000000000000164
10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.001
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.
2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2020
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2020
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QP
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s13018-020-01650-5
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE



Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1749-799X
EndPage 8
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_f1a58e5889224d318efda126b1abeb4b
PMC7137326
A627329769
32264901
10_1186_s13018_020_01650_5
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29L
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
IPT
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~8M
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7QP
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-302afe2f82b73fa43e3cc2d0d7ad4df8fa49ec4a19716feeb6e4ad60734c90f83
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1749-799X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:30:47 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:24:47 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 15:55:14 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 06:59:03 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:25:49 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:39:11 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:07:42 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:17:24 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:07:18 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Finite element study
Osteoporotic lumbosacral spine
Cement-augmented pedicle screw
Adjacent segment
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c563t-302afe2f82b73fa43e3cc2d0d7ad4df8fa49ec4a19716feeb6e4ad60734c90f83
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/f1a58e5889224d318efda126b1abeb4b
PMID 32264901
PQID 2391400250
PQPubID 55349
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f1a58e5889224d318efda126b1abeb4b
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7137326
proquest_miscellaneous_2387650520
proquest_journals_2391400250
gale_infotracmisc_A627329769
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A627329769
pubmed_primary_32264901
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13018_020_01650_5
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_020_01650_5
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-04-07
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-04-07
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-04-07
  day: 07
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
PublicationTitleAlternate J Orthop Surg Res
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References 1650_CR9
H Xu (1650_CR20) 2013; 73
KS Tay (1650_CR30) 2016; 16
F Galbusera (1650_CR26) 2015; 24
1650_CR1
1650_CR22
D Liu (1650_CR32) 2016; 16
CS Shim (1650_CR24) 2008; 33
P Korovessis (1650_CR2) 2018; 2018
HZ Guo (1650_CR5) 2019; 28
W Wang (1650_CR3) 2019; 183
WT Zhao (1650_CR23) 2018; 13
K Kobayashi (1650_CR25) 2018; 27
YP Huang (1650_CR21) 2016; 11
GY Mo (1650_CR4) 2019; 14
H Wang (1650_CR29) 2017; 96
Y Peng (1650_CR19) 2018; 56
HH Lin (1650_CR6) 2018; 42
S Okuda (1650_CR11) 2018; 43
JC Wu (1650_CR27) 2011; 31
CH Lee (1650_CR13) 2017; 27
JH Klingler (1650_CR8) 2015; 2015
XP Xia (1650_CR28) 2013; 38
K Wang Md (1650_CR16) 2018; 18
J Ramirez-Villaescusa (1650_CR14) 2019; 33
JM Kim (1650_CR34) 2012; 52
MN Erdem (1650_CR7) 2017; 17
KP Schulitz (1650_CR33) 1996; 134
JZ Yan (1650_CR15) 2009; 89
T Wang (1650_CR17) 2019; 69
JC Lee (1650_CR31) 2014; 39
K Phan (1650_CR10) 2018; 27
MV Rijsbergen (1650_CR12) 2018; 13
BT Allaire (1650_CR18) 2019; 30
References_xml – volume: 183
  start-page: 105377
  year: 2019
  ident: 1650_CR3
  publication-title: Clin Neurol Neurosurg.
  doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105377
– volume: 38
  start-page: 597
  issue: 7
  year: 2013
  ident: 1650_CR28
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318273a2ea
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1661
  issue: 7
  year: 2019
  ident: 1650_CR5
  publication-title: Eur Spine J.
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05985-4
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1005
  issue: 5
  year: 2015
  ident: 1650_CR26
  publication-title: Eur Spine J.
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6
– ident: 1650_CR22
  doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.164
– volume: 30
  start-page: 323
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 1650_CR18
  publication-title: Osteoporos Int.
  doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4716-1
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1698
  issue: 8
  year: 2018
  ident: 1650_CR25
  publication-title: Eur Spine J.
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5513-4
– volume: 13
  start-page: e0200899
  issue: 8
  year: 2018
  ident: 1650_CR12
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200899
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1313
  issue: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: 1650_CR6
  publication-title: Int Orthop
  doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3812-3
– volume: 52
  start-page: 435
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 1650_CR34
  publication-title: J Korean Neurosurg Soc
  doi: 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.5.435
– volume: 31
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  ident: 1650_CR27
  publication-title: Neurosurg Focus.
  doi: 10.3171/2011.7.FOCUS11125
– volume: 27
  start-page: 643
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  ident: 1650_CR13
  publication-title: J Neurosurg Spine.
  doi: 10.3171/2017.3.SPINE161169
– volume: 73
  start-page: ons198
  issue: 2 Suppl Operati
  year: 2013
  ident: 1650_CR20
  publication-title: Neurosurgery
– volume: 13
  start-page: 32
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 1650_CR23
  publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res.
  doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0733-1
– volume: 33
  start-page: E820
  issue: 22
  year: 2008
  ident: 1650_CR24
  publication-title: Locker. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181894fb1
– volume: 16
  start-page: 182
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 1650_CR30
  publication-title: Spine J.
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.026
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1124
  issue: 9
  year: 2016
  ident: 1650_CR32
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.04.015
– volume: 2015
  start-page: 979186
  year: 2015
  ident: 1650_CR8
  publication-title: Spine J
– volume: 96
  issue: 5
  year: 2017
  ident: 1650_CR29
  publication-title: Medicine (Baltimore).
  doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006032
– volume: 69
  start-page: 178
  year: 2019
  ident: 1650_CR17
  publication-title: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.032
– volume: 134
  start-page: 171
  issue: 2
  year: 1996
  ident: 1650_CR33
  publication-title: Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb.
  doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039791
– volume: 33
  start-page: 17
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 1650_CR14
  publication-title: Br J Neurosurg.
  doi: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1523365
– volume: 43
  start-page: E1384
  issue: 23
  year: 2018
  ident: 1650_CR11
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002710
– volume: 14
  start-page: 170
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 1650_CR4
  publication-title: J Orthop Surg Res.
  doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1213-y
– volume: 11
  start-page: e0166452
  issue: 11
  year: 2016
  ident: 1650_CR21
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166452
– ident: 1650_CR1
  doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.073
– volume: 89
  start-page: 1162
  issue: 17
  year: 2009
  ident: 1650_CR15
  publication-title: Chin Med J
– ident: 1650_CR9
  doi: 10.1080/10255842.2019.1639047
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1981
  issue: 8
  year: 2018
  ident: 1650_CR10
  publication-title: Eur Spine J.
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5629-6
– volume: 56
  start-page: 2137
  issue: 11
  year: 2018
  ident: 1650_CR19
  publication-title: Med Biol Eng Comput.
  doi: 10.1007/s11517-018-1844-x
– volume: 17
  start-page: 328
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  ident: 1650_CR7
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.001
– volume: 39
  start-page: E339
  issue: 5
  year: 2014
  ident: 1650_CR31
  publication-title: Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000164
– volume: 2018
  start-page: 1623647
  year: 2018
  ident: 1650_CR2
  publication-title: Adv Orthop.
– volume: 18
  start-page: 2288
  issue: 12
  year: 2018
  ident: 1650_CR16
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.001
SSID ssj0050584
Score 2.3012445
Snippet To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). A...
Purpose To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration...
To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). A...
To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment degeneration...
Abstract Purpose To compare the effect of conventional pedicle screw (CPS) and cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) on adjacent segment...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 132
SubjectTerms Adjacent segment
Adult
Biomechanics
Bone Cements
Cadavers
Cartilage
Cement
Cement-augmented pedicle screw
Degeneration
Finite Element Analysis
Finite element study
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Internal fixation
Intervertebral discs
Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Male
Mathematical models
Orthopedics
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging
Osteoporosis - surgery
Osteoporotic lumbosacral spine
Pedicle Screws
Sacrum - diagnostic imaging
Sacrum - surgery
Spine (lumbar)
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Jb9UwELagXLggEFugICMhcUBWk3iJwwWVpSpIcKLSu1ley6tK8iCt-Cf8XmachUZIPb54kmdnVjsz3xDyUlahkTIoJlolmBAtqJT2JaudiuDNgi0zWPWXr-r4RHzeyM104DZMaZWzTcyGOvQez8gPat7CXgA99tvdT4Zdo_Dr6tRC4ya5hdBlmNLVbJYNFzh3LeZCGa0OBrDXlWa4YcIinpLJlTPKmP3_W-YrrmmdNnnFDx3dJXemAJIejhy_R27E7j7582nuNUL7RH0-8mP28jQjbga6w68x55GCiYi_6TaDxv6Yio46-E1tR7HYo4dgvIfnUrBYrh-sh_-nww4CUYqZnhSCRWrDmcWp0SHmxw9vqKX8A01bjF5pHNPRaYatfUBOjj5-e3_Mpo4LzEvFLxgva5tinXTtGp6s4JF7X4cyNDaIkDRcaqMXtkLgqRQjMFTYoMBMCN-WSfOHZK_ru_iYUNhJlc5zLlRKQJPawJWIkgvHRdKKF6SaX73xExw5dsU4N3lbopUZ2WWAXSazy8iCvF7u2Y1gHNdSv0OOLpQIpJ0v9L9OzaSXJlVW6ii1biGWCWDgYgq2qpWrrItOuIK8QnkwqO4wPW-nqgVYJAJnmUMF8V8NMV1bkP0VJaipXw_PEmUmMzGYf0JdkBfLMN6JqW9d7C-RBhwWthsEmkejAC5L4lgGDRFdQZqVaK7WvB7ptt8ziHhTcZiZenL9tJ6S23XWF8HKZp_sgXjGZxCFXbjnWdX-AjGFMwI
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Jb9UwELZKuXBBILZAQUZC4oAMSbzEQUKoLFVBKiee1JvleCkPPZJH0wr4I_xeZpxFjag4cUw8TrzMmni-IeSJLHwlpVdM1EowIWoQKe1yVjYqgDXzNk9g1Uef1OFKfDyWxztkKnc0LmB_aWiH9aRWp5vnP7__eg0C_yoJvFYvetDDhWYYCGFyTs7kFXIVLFOFgnok5r8KYOy1mBJnLu23ME4Jw_9vTX3BVC2PUV6wSwc3yPXRoaT7AwfcJDuhvUV-f5hqj9AuUpc-ATJ7fpIQOD3d4t-ZTaCgMsIPuk4gst_GJKQWrqltKSZ_dLAuHTyXggZrut46eD_tt-CYUjz5ScF5pNZ_tTg02of0-P4ltZS_o3GN3iwNw_F0mmBsb5PVwfvPbw_ZWIGBOan4GeN5aWMooy6bikcreODOlT73lfXCRw236uCELRCIKoYAGyysV6A2hKvzqPkdstt2bbhHKERWeeM4FypGoIm150oEyUXDRdSKZ6SYlt64EZ4cq2RsTApTtDLDdhnYLpO2y8iMPJv7bAdwjn9Sv8EdnSkRWDvd6E5PzCinJhZW6iC1rsG38aDwQvS2KFVT2CY0osnIU-QHgwwJw3N2zGKASSKQltlX4A-W4OPVGdlbUILYumXzxFFm4npT8hoCXnRLM_J4bsaeeBSuDd050oABw_KDQHN3YMB5ShzTosHDy0i1YM3FnJct7fpLAhWvCg4jU_f_xyI9INfKJFWC5dUe2QUmDg_BdztrHiWB_APRGkOk
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Influence of cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in an osteoporotic lumbosacral spine over the adjacent segments: a 3D finite element study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264901
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2391400250
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2387650520
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7137326
https://doaj.org/article/f1a58e5889224d318efda126b1abeb4b
Volume 15
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELZguXBBIF6BpTISEgdkbRI7jsOtC7taKu0KASv1ZvkJRUtSKbvin_B7mXGSqhESXLi0ajxJbc94Hu3MN4S8qgpfV5WXTDRSMCEaOFLK5ay0MoA18yZPYNXnF_LsUqzW1Xqv1RfmhA3wwMPGHcXCVCpUSjVgbDxIYIjeFKW0hbHBCovaF2zeFEwNOhjMuhJTiYySRz1o6kIxDJWwfCdn1cwMJbT-P3XynlGaJ0zuWaDT--Te6DrS5TDlB-RWaB-SXx-mLiO0i9SlH_uYufmasDY93eL_MFeBgnIIP-kmwcX-GMuNWvhMTUuxzKMDN7yD51LQVbbrjYPvp_0WXFCKOZ4U3ERq_HeDU6N9SI_v31JD-XsaN-i30jAkotMEWPuIXJ6efHl3xsZeC8xVkl8znpcmhjKq0tY8GsEDd670ua-NFz4quNQEJ0yBkFMxBGClMF6CghCuyaPij8lB27XhKaEQQ-XWcS5kjEATG8-lCBUXlouoJM9IMW29diMQOfbDuNIpIFFSD-zSwC6d2KWrjLzZ3bMdYDj-Sn2MHN1RIoR2ugCCpUfB0v8SrIy8RnnQeNBhes6M9QqwSITM0ksJnl8J3lyTkcMZJRxQNx-eJEqPCqLXJW8gtEUHNCMvd8N4Jya9taG7QRowVdhoEGieDAK4WxLHAmjw5TJSz0Rztub5SLv5luDD64LDzOSz_7FJz8ndMp0qwfL6kByAEIcX4KVd2wW5Xa_rBbmzXK4-r-D9-OTi46dFOqbwei7Ub8vmQVI
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbK9gAXBOIVKGAkEAcUNYkdx0FCqKWturRdIdRKvRnHj7KoJAtpVfFH-Bn8RmacZGmE1FuPG0-8dub1TeKZIeRlntoiz62IeSl4zHkJKiVNEmeVcODNrE5CseqDmdg94h-P8-MV8mfIhcFjlYNNDIbaNgbfka9nrIRYAD32-8WPGLtG4dfVoYVGJxZ77tcFhGztu-kW8PdVlu1sH37YjfuuArHJBTuLWZJp7zIvs6pgXnPmmDGZTWyhLbdewqXSGa5TLK7knYNFc20FqAI3ZeIlg3lvkFXOIJSZkNXN7dmnz4PtBzgh-ZCaI8V6Cx4ilTGGaJg2lMT5yP2FLgH_-4JLznB8UPOS59u5Q273kJVudDJ2l6y4-h75PR26m9DGUxNeMsb6_CTU-LR0gd9_Th0Fo-Qu6DyUqf3epznV8JvqmmJ6SQPwv4F5KdjIqmm1gf-n7QKgL8WzpRTgKdX2m8al0daF6du3VFO2Rf0c8TJ13QF4Ggrl3idH18KNB2RSN7V7RCjEbkllGOPCe6DxpWWCu5zxinEvBYtIOjx6ZfoC6NiH41SFQEgK1bFLAbtUYJfKI_Jmec-iK_9xJfUmcnRJiaW7w4Xm54nqLYHyqc6ly6UsAT1ZMKnOW51mokp15SpeReQ1yoNCAwPLM7rPk4BNYqkutSEAcWaAIsuIrI0owTCY8fAgUao3TK36p0YRebEcxjvxsF3tmnOkAReJDQ6B5mEngMstMUy8BgwZkWIkmqM9j0fq-ddQtrxIGaxMPL56Wc_Jzd3Dg321P53tPSG3sqA7PE6KNTIBUXVPAQOeVc96xaPky3Xr-l-ZbnNJ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence+of+cement-augmented+pedicle+screw+instrumentation+in+an+osteoporotic+lumbosacral+spine+over+the+adjacent+segments%3A+a+3D+finite+element+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+orthopaedic+surgery+and+research&rft.au=Quan-kun+Zhou&rft.au=Fan-hui+Zeng&rft.au=Jian-long+Tu&rft.au=Zhang-qing+Dong&rft.date=2020-04-07&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1749-799X&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13018-020-01650-5&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_f1a58e5889224d318efda126b1abeb4b
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1749-799X&client=summon