Reassessing the most popularly suggested measurement models and measurement invariance of the Maslach Burnout Inventory - human service survey among Vietnamese healthcare professionals

Despite its popularity, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS)'s factorial structure has been subject to considerable debate, and its measurement invariance (MI) is seldomly examined. This cross-sectional study aims at reassessing the most popularly suggested structures of thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHealth psychology & behavioral medicine Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 104 - 120
Main Authors Bui, Thi Hong Thai, Tran, Thi Minh Duc, Nguyen, Thi Nhu Trang, Vu, Thy Cam, Ngo, Xuan Diep, Nguyen, Thi Hang Phuong, Do, Thi Le Hang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Routledge 31.12.2022
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Burnout
healthcare professionals
MBI-HSS
measurement invariance
measurement model
Mental disorders
Mental health
Occupations
Questionnaires
Vietnam
measurement model
measurement invariance
burnout
healthcare professionals
MBI-HSS
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract Despite its popularity, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS)'s factorial structure has been subject to considerable debate, and its measurement invariance (MI) is seldomly examined. This cross-sectional study aims at reassessing the most popularly suggested structures of this instrument, namely the 20- and 22-item three-factor model on Vietnamese healthcare professionals. It also examines the MI of MBI-HSS across genders, occupations, and mental health conditions. Self-administered questionnaires were sent out to 1500 doctors and nurses working at 15 hospitals in big cities in Vietnam in September and October 2020, and 1162 valid questionnaires were collected. The questionnaire consists of three sets of questions covering (1) demographic information of participants; (2) MBI-HSS questionnaire; and (3) The 21-item version of the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale. MBI-HSS scale was validated on Vietnamese sample for the first time; therefore, we used the repeated forward-backward procedure to translate this scale into Vietnamese. To examine which model best fits the data, a series of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the model fit of correlated three-factor model, second-order hierarchical model, and bi-factor model. The reliability of the MBI-HSS was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficients. Then, multiple-group CFA (MGCFA) was applied to determine whether the MBI-HSS has a similar structure between groups different in gender, occupation, and mental health condition. Our findings confirmed that the 22-item MBI-HSS best fit the data, and this scale measures three distinct but related aspects of burnout, including Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, and Personal Accomplishment. The MI of MBI-HSS across genders and occupations was also confirmed. However, data did not fit well with group at risk for common mental health disorders. It can be concluded that the Vietnamese version of MBI-HSS is a valid measure to assess burnout level of healthcare professionals in Vietnam who are not at risk for mental health disorders.
AbstractList Despite its popularity, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS)'s factorial structure has been subject to considerable debate, and its measurement invariance (MI) is seldomly examined. This cross-sectional study aims at reassessing the most popularly suggested structures of this instrument, namely the 20- and 22-item three-factor model on Vietnamese healthcare professionals. It also examines the MI of MBI-HSS across genders, occupations, and mental health conditions. Self-administered questionnaires were sent out to 1500 doctors and nurses working at 15 hospitals in big cities in Vietnam in September and October 2020, and 1162 valid questionnaires were collected. The questionnaire consists of three sets of questions covering (1) demographic information of participants; (2) MBI-HSS questionnaire; and (3) The 21-item version of the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale. MBI-HSS scale was validated on Vietnamese sample for the first time; therefore, we used the repeated forward-backward procedure to translate this scale into Vietnamese. To examine which model best fits the data, a series of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the model fit of correlated three-factor model, second-order hierarchical model, and bi-factor model. The reliability of the MBI-HSS was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficients. Then, multiple-group CFA (MGCFA) was applied to determine whether the MBI-HSS has a similar structure between groups different in gender, occupation, and mental health condition. Our findings confirmed that the 22-item MBI-HSS best fit the data, and this scale measures three distinct but related aspects of burnout, including Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, and Personal Accomplishment. The MI of MBI-HSS across genders and occupations was also confirmed. However, data did not fit well with group at risk for common mental health disorders. It can be concluded that the Vietnamese version of MBI-HSS is a valid measure to assess burnout level of healthcare professionals in Vietnam who are not at risk for mental health disorders.
Despite its popularity, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS)'s factorial structure has been subject to considerable debate, and its measurement invariance (MI) is seldomly examined. This cross-sectional study aims at reassessing the most popularly suggested structures of this instrument, namely the 20- and 22-item three-factor model on Vietnamese healthcare professionals. It also examines the MI of MBI-HSS across genders, occupations, and mental health conditions. Self-administered questionnaires were sent out to 1500 doctors and nurses working at 15 hospitals in big cities in Vietnam in September and October 2020, and 1162 valid questionnaires were collected. The questionnaire consists of three sets of questions covering (1) demographic information of participants; (2) MBI-HSS questionnaire; and (3) The 21-item version of the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale. MBI-HSS scale was validated on Vietnamese sample for the first time; therefore, we used the repeated forward-backward procedure to translate this scale into Vietnamese. To examine which model best fits the data, a series of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the model fit of correlated three-factor model, second-order hierarchical model, and bi-factor model. The reliability of the MBI-HSS was assessed using Cronbach's coefficients. Then, multiple-group CFA (MGCFA) was applied to determine whether the MBI-HSS has a similar structure between groups different in gender, occupation, and mental health condition. Our findings confirmed that the 22-item MBI-HSS best fit the data, and this scale measures three distinct but related aspects of burnout, including Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, and Personal Accomplishment. The MI of MBI-HSS across genders and occupations was also confirmed. However, data did not fit well with group at risk for common mental health disorders. It can be concluded that the Vietnamese version of MBI-HSS is a valid measure to assess burnout level of healthcare professionals in Vietnam who are not at risk for mental health disorders.
Despite its popularity, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS)'s factorial structure has been subject to considerable debate, and its measurement invariance (MI) is seldomly examined. This cross-sectional study aims at reassessing the most popularly suggested structures of this instrument, namely the 20- and 22-item three-factor model on Vietnamese healthcare professionals. It also examines the MI of MBI-HSS across genders, occupations, and mental health conditions.BACKGROUNDDespite its popularity, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS)'s factorial structure has been subject to considerable debate, and its measurement invariance (MI) is seldomly examined. This cross-sectional study aims at reassessing the most popularly suggested structures of this instrument, namely the 20- and 22-item three-factor model on Vietnamese healthcare professionals. It also examines the MI of MBI-HSS across genders, occupations, and mental health conditions.Self-administered questionnaires were sent out to 1500 doctors and nurses working at 15 hospitals in big cities in Vietnam in September and October 2020, and 1162 valid questionnaires were collected. The questionnaire consists of three sets of questions covering (1) demographic information of participants; (2) MBI-HSS questionnaire; and (3) The 21-item version of the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale. MBI-HSS scale was validated on Vietnamese sample for the first time; therefore, we used the repeated forward-backward procedure to translate this scale into Vietnamese. To examine which model best fits the data, a series of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the model fit of correlated three-factor model, second-order hierarchical model, and bi-factor model. The reliability of the MBI-HSS was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficients. Then, multiple-group CFA (MGCFA) was applied to determine whether the MBI-HSS has a similar structure between groups different in gender, occupation, and mental health condition.METHODSelf-administered questionnaires were sent out to 1500 doctors and nurses working at 15 hospitals in big cities in Vietnam in September and October 2020, and 1162 valid questionnaires were collected. The questionnaire consists of three sets of questions covering (1) demographic information of participants; (2) MBI-HSS questionnaire; and (3) The 21-item version of the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale. MBI-HSS scale was validated on Vietnamese sample for the first time; therefore, we used the repeated forward-backward procedure to translate this scale into Vietnamese. To examine which model best fits the data, a series of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the model fit of correlated three-factor model, second-order hierarchical model, and bi-factor model. The reliability of the MBI-HSS was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficients. Then, multiple-group CFA (MGCFA) was applied to determine whether the MBI-HSS has a similar structure between groups different in gender, occupation, and mental health condition.Our findings confirmed that the 22-item MBI-HSS best fit the data, and this scale measures three distinct but related aspects of burnout, including Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, and Personal Accomplishment. The MI of MBI-HSS across genders and occupations was also confirmed. However, data did not fit well with group at risk for common mental health disorders. It can be concluded that the Vietnamese version of MBI-HSS is a valid measure to assess burnout level of healthcare professionals in Vietnam who are not at risk for mental health disorders.RESULTSOur findings confirmed that the 22-item MBI-HSS best fit the data, and this scale measures three distinct but related aspects of burnout, including Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, and Personal Accomplishment. The MI of MBI-HSS across genders and occupations was also confirmed. However, data did not fit well with group at risk for common mental health disorders. It can be concluded that the Vietnamese version of MBI-HSS is a valid measure to assess burnout level of healthcare professionals in Vietnam who are not at risk for mental health disorders.
BackgroundDespite its popularity, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS)’s factorial structure has been subject to considerable debate, and its measurement invariance (MI) is seldomly examined. This cross-sectional study aims at reassessing the most popularly suggested structures of this instrument, namely the 20- and 22-item three-factor model on Vietnamese healthcare professionals. It also examines the MI of MBI-HSS across genders, occupations, and mental health conditions.MethodSelf-administered questionnaires were sent out to 1500 doctors and nurses working at 15 hospitals in big cities in Vietnam in September and October 2020, and 1162 valid questionnaires were collected. The questionnaire consists of three sets of questions covering (1) demographic information of participants; (2) MBI-HSS questionnaire; and (3) The 21-item version of the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale. MBI-HSS scale was validated on Vietnamese sample for the first time; therefore, we used the repeated forward–backward procedure to translate this scale into Vietnamese. To examine which model best fits the data, a series of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the model fit of correlated three-factor model, second-order hierarchical model, and bi-factor model. The reliability of the MBI-HSS was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficients. Then, multiple-group CFA (MGCFA) was applied to determine whether the MBI-HSS has a similar structure between groups different in gender, occupation, and mental health condition.ResultsOur findings confirmed that the 22-item MBI-HSS best fit the data, and this scale measures three distinct but related aspects of burnout, including Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, and Personal Accomplishment. The MI of MBI-HSS across genders and occupations was also confirmed. However, data did not fit well with group at risk for common mental health disorders. It can be concluded that the Vietnamese version of MBI-HSS is a valid measure to assess burnout level of healthcare professionals in Vietnam who are not at risk for mental health disorders.
Background Despite its popularity, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS)’s factorial structure has been subject to considerable debate, and its measurement invariance (MI) is seldomly examined. This cross-sectional study aims at reassessing the most popularly suggested structures of this instrument, namely the 20- and 22-item three-factor model on Vietnamese healthcare professionals. It also examines the MI of MBI-HSS across genders, occupations, and mental health conditions. Method Self-administered questionnaires were sent out to 1500 doctors and nurses working at 15 hospitals in big cities in Vietnam in September and October 2020, and 1162 valid questionnaires were collected. The questionnaire consists of three sets of questions covering (1) demographic information of participants; (2) MBI-HSS questionnaire; and (3) The 21-item version of the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale. MBI-HSS scale was validated on Vietnamese sample for the first time; therefore, we used the repeated forward–backward procedure to translate this scale into Vietnamese. To examine which model best fits the data, a series of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the model fit of correlated three-factor model, second-order hierarchical model, and bi-factor model. The reliability of the MBI-HSS was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficients. Then, multiple-group CFA (MGCFA) was applied to determine whether the MBI-HSS has a similar structure between groups different in gender, occupation, and mental health condition. Results Our findings confirmed that the 22-item MBI-HSS best fit the data, and this scale measures three distinct but related aspects of burnout, including Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, and Personal Accomplishment. The MI of MBI-HSS across genders and occupations was also confirmed. However, data did not fit well with group at risk for common mental health disorders. It can be concluded that the Vietnamese version of MBI-HSS is a valid measure to assess burnout level of healthcare professionals in Vietnam who are not at risk for mental health disorders.
Author Nguyen, Thi Hang Phuong
Do, Thi Le Hang
Bui, Thi Hong Thai
Tran, Thi Minh Duc
Vu, Thy Cam
Nguyen, Thi Nhu Trang
Ngo, Xuan Diep
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Thi Hong Thai
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2163-7572
  surname: Bui
  fullname: Bui, Thi Hong Thai
  email: hongthaibui.psy@gmail.com
  organization: VNU University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Thi Minh Duc
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3744-6981
  surname: Tran
  fullname: Tran, Thi Minh Duc
  organization: VNU University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Thi Nhu Trang
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0224-2970
  surname: Nguyen
  fullname: Nguyen, Thi Nhu Trang
  organization: VNU University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Thy Cam
  surname: Vu
  fullname: Vu, Thy Cam
  organization: National Institute of Mental Health
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Xuan Diep
  surname: Ngo
  fullname: Ngo, Xuan Diep
  organization: VNU University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Thi Hang Phuong
  surname: Nguyen
  fullname: Nguyen, Thi Hang Phuong
  organization: University of Science & Education, The University of Da Nang
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Thi Le Hang
  surname: Do
  fullname: Do, Thi Le Hang
  organization: Institute of Psychology
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFUl2L1DAULbLiruv-BCXgiy-zJmnTpgiiLn4MrAiivobb9HaaJU3GpB2Zf-bPM92ZkZ190Dwkl5tzTg6553F24rzDLHvK6CWjkr7krCy4FPSSU87SxmohxYPsbO4v5ouTO_VpdhHjDU1LyoIJ8Sg7zQWleU3ZWfb7K0KMGKNxKzL2SAYfR7L268lCsFsSp9UK44gtGRJwCjigGxOoRRsJuOO2cRsIBpxG4rtbtc8QLeievJuC89NIlm6TgD5syYL00wCORAwbkwhJZINbAoNPRn4YHB0MGJH0CHbsNQQk6-C72al3YOOT7GGXDrzYn-fZ9w_vv119Wlx_-bi8enu90KLk40Kzoi47JvOqwU7qgraiyaEqmqquAQpdgOx4XUGRS8awBZHXyGRD54pSDvl5ttzpth5u1DqYAcJWeTDqtuHDSkEYjbaoaMW1rJnQHZdFq2soGym7pm04FazWPGm93mmtp2bAVqevCGCPRI9vnOnVym-UrArG8yIJvNgLBP9zSnNRg4karQWHfoqKlywNvKK0TNDn96A3Pg0hfZXilRBlxSs2O3p219FfK4eAJMCrHUAHH2PATmkzwphmkAwaqxhVcyLVIZFqTqTaJzKxxT324YH_8d7seMZ1PgzwywfbqhG21ocupICZqPJ_S_wBNsj8EQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_23311908_2022_2075614
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2022_09_141
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58111516
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1439470
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_025_12235_5
crossref_primary_10_1177_13591053251314932
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2022_1087947
crossref_primary_10_1080_23311975_2024_2326237
crossref_primary_10_52589_BJMMS_PQYHWGZ1
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2023_1140552
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2023_106377
Cites_doi 10.1080/02678370500385913
10.1080/13603124.2020.1791964
10.1080/026783700417212
10.3390/ijerph18158172
10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00695
10.1002/smi.2481
10.1177/001316448104100425
10.1016/j.anr.2018.01.003
10.1590/s0034-89102005000100001
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06114.x
10.1002/job.115
10.1080/02678370500297720
10.1080/01488376.2018.1480549
10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
10.1027/1015-5759.20.4.320
10.1186/1471-244x-13-24
10.5402/2012/593876
10.1002/nur.4770090210
10.1371/journal.pone.0114987
10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
10.1037/004284
10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.93
10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00012-3
10.2466/pr0.1985.57.1.147
10.1080/02678370902834021
10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01413.x
10.1016/j.burn.2014.04.002
10.1111/j.1442-2018.2006.00283.x
10.1002/job.4030140703
10.1177/1049731508318550
10.31478/201810b
10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.89
10.3390/ijerph17155604
10.1007/s40596-017-0849-3
10.1016/j.burn.2014.03.002
10.1080/10705519909540118
10.3390/healthcare8040421
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.004
10.4324/9781315827506
10.1002/job.4030060205
10.3402/ljm.v9.23556
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00663
10.3390/ijerph18084361
10.1023/A:1015630930326
10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.07.012
10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
10.1177/0013164410391579
10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3713
10.1002/smi.2737
10.1002/job.4030020205
10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00950
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2022
2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2022 The Author(s)
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2022
– notice: 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
– notice: 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2022 The Author(s)
DBID 0YH
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7XB
88G
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
M2M
M2O
MBDVC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PSYQQ
Q9U
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1080/21642850.2021.2019585
DatabaseName Taylor & Francis Open Access
CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
Psychology Database
Research Library
Research Library (Corporate)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest One Psychology
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest One Psychology
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Open Access Full Text
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 0YH
  name: Taylor & Francis Open Access
  url: https://www.tandfonline.com
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
EISSN 2164-2850
EndPage 120
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_072c8915cf284dc9a6b88fbdb20519c2
PMC8741234
35003901
10_1080_21642850_2021_2019585
2019585
Genre Research Article
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Vietnam
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Vietnam
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED)
  grantid: 501.02-2020.01
  funderid: 10.13039/100007224
GroupedDBID 0YH
5VS
8FI
8FJ
8G5
ABUWG
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADCVX
AFKRA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AZQEC
BCNDV
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
EBS
EMOBN
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GUQSH
H13
KQ8
M2M
M2O
M4Z
M~E
OK1
PGMZT
PROAC
PSYQQ
RDKPK
RPM
TFL
TFMNY
TFW
UKHRP
AAYXX
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
BPHCQ
EJD
NPM
PQQKQ
3V.
7XB
8FK
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-c1496f1837bef8c40d5b3a74b799aa4c4a8f297a43811eda539e18b0da53002a3
IEDL.DBID 0YH
ISSN 2164-2850
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:04 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:20:48 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 05:16:15 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 07:58:11 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:06:04 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:24 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:03:10 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 25 09:03:41 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords measurement model
measurement invariance
burnout
healthcare professionals
MBI-HSS
Language English
License open-access: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c562t-c1496f1837bef8c40d5b3a74b799aa4c4a8f297a43811eda539e18b0da53002a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work.
ORCID 0000-0003-2163-7572
0000-0003-0224-2970
0000-0003-3744-6981
OpenAccessLink https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21642850.2021.2019585
PMID 35003901
PQID 2755672712
PQPubID 3933310
PageCount 17
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2618507006
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_21642850_2021_2019585
proquest_journals_2755672712
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_21642850_2021_2019585
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8741234
doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_072c8915cf284dc9a6b88fbdb20519c2
pubmed_primary_35003901
crossref_primary_10_1080_21642850_2021_2019585
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-12-31
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-12-31
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-12-31
  day: 31
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Abingdon
PublicationTitle Health psychology & behavioral medicine
PublicationTitleAlternate Health Psychol Behav Med
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Routledge
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Taylor & Francis Group
Publisher_xml – name: Routledge
– name: Taylor & Francis Ltd
– name: Taylor & Francis Group
References CIT0030
CIT0032
CIT0031
CIT0034
Nunnally J. C. (CIT0043) 1994
Golembiewski R. T. (CIT0020) 1984; 6
Byrne B. M. (CIT0007) 2012
CIT0036
CIT0035
CIT0039
CIT0041
CIT0040
CIT0042
CIT0001
CIT0045
CIT0044
CIT0003
CIT0047
CIT0002
CIT0046
CIT0005
CIT0049
CIT0004
CIT0048
CIT0009
CIT0008
CIT0050
CIT0052
CIT0051
CIT0010
CIT0054
Maslach C. (CIT0038) 1996
CIT0053
CIT0012
CIT0056
CIT0011
CIT0055
DeVellis R. F. (CIT0015) 2017
Lovibond S. H. (CIT0033) 1995
Brown M. W. (CIT0006) 1993
CIT0014
CIT0058
CIT0013
CIT0057
CIT0016
CIT0059
CIT0018
CIT0017
CIT0019
Maslach C. (CIT0037) 1986
CIT0061
CIT0060
CIT0062
CIT0021
CIT0023
CIT0022
Jöreskog K. G. (CIT0027) 1993
CIT0025
CIT0024
CIT0026
CIT0029
CIT0028
References_xml – ident: CIT0053
  doi: 10.1080/02678370500385913
– ident: CIT0055
  doi: 10.1080/13603124.2020.1791964
– ident: CIT0028
  doi: 10.1080/026783700417212
– ident: CIT0022
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158172
– ident: CIT0059
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00695
– volume-title: Structural equation modeling with MPLUS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming
  year: 2012
  ident: CIT0007
– volume-title: Maslach Burnout Inventory manual
  year: 1996
  ident: CIT0038
– ident: CIT0039
  doi: 10.1002/smi.2481
– ident: CIT0026
  doi: 10.1177/001316448104100425
– ident: CIT0041
  doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2018.01.003
– ident: CIT0019
  doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102005000100001
– ident: CIT0047
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06114.x
– ident: CIT0014
  doi: 10.1002/job.115
– ident: CIT0031
  doi: 10.1080/02678370500297720
– volume-title: Scale development: Theory and applications
  year: 2017
  ident: CIT0015
– ident: CIT0021
  doi: 10.1080/01488376.2018.1480549
– ident: CIT0013
  doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
– ident: CIT0049
  doi: 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
– ident: CIT0024
  doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.20.4.320
– ident: CIT0058
  doi: 10.1186/1471-244x-13-24
– ident: CIT0017
  doi: 10.5402/2012/593876
– start-page: 294
  volume-title: Testing structural equation models
  year: 1993
  ident: CIT0027
– ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.1002/nur.4770090210
– ident: CIT0032
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114987
– ident: CIT0011
  doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
– ident: CIT0035
  doi: 10.1037/004284
– ident: CIT0023
  doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.93
– ident: CIT0004
  doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00012-3
– ident: CIT0018
  doi: 10.2466/pr0.1985.57.1.147
– ident: CIT0051
  doi: 10.1080/02678370902834021
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01413.x
– volume-title: Manual for the depression anxiety & Stress scales
  year: 1995
  ident: CIT0033
– volume-title: Psychometric theory
  year: 1994
  ident: CIT0043
– ident: CIT0040
  doi: 10.1016/j.burn.2014.04.002
– ident: CIT0029
  doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2006.00283.x
– ident: CIT0054
  doi: 10.1002/job.4030140703
– ident: CIT0030
  doi: 10.1177/1049731508318550
– ident: CIT0046
– ident: CIT0016
  doi: 10.31478/201810b
– start-page: 136
  volume-title: Testing structural equation models
  year: 1993
  ident: CIT0006
– ident: CIT0061
  doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.89
– ident: CIT0012
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155604
– ident: CIT0060
  doi: 10.1007/s40596-017-0849-3
– ident: CIT0056
  doi: 10.1016/j.burn.2014.03.002
– ident: CIT0025
  doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
– ident: CIT0001
  doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040421
– volume: 6
  start-page: 290
  issue: 3
  year: 1984
  ident: CIT0020
  publication-title: Journal of Health and Human Resources Administration
– ident: CIT0048
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.004
– ident: CIT0010
  doi: 10.4324/9781315827506
– volume-title: Maslach Burnout Inventory, manual research edition
  year: 1986
  ident: CIT0037
– ident: CIT0005
  doi: 10.1002/job.4030060205
– ident: CIT0050
  doi: 10.3402/ljm.v9.23556
– ident: CIT0002
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00663
– ident: CIT0034
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084361
– ident: CIT0052
  doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326
– ident: CIT0044
  doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.07.012
– ident: CIT0009
  doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
– ident: CIT0062
  doi: 10.1177/0013164410391579
– ident: CIT0045
  doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3713
– ident: CIT0057
  doi: 10.1002/smi.2737
– ident: CIT0036
  doi: 10.1002/job.4030020205
– ident: CIT0042
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00950
SSID ssj0000884155
Score 2.2922537
Snippet Despite its popularity, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS)'s factorial structure has been subject to considerable debate, and its...
BackgroundDespite its popularity, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS)’s factorial structure has been subject to considerable debate, and...
Background Despite its popularity, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey (MBI-HSS)’s factorial structure has been subject to considerable debate, and...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 104
SubjectTerms Burnout
healthcare professionals
MBI-HSS
measurement invariance
measurement model
Mental disorders
Mental health
Occupations
Questionnaires
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwELZQT1wQiL9AQUbiGmo7tmMfKaIqSHBAFPVmOY7TXalNVptspb31HXibPk6fhLGTDUmFtBduK-dvnfky_sYef4PQe-kFLYmEDykvq5QriFmVdywFskGt8gxaY4Lsd3l6xr-ei_NJqa-QE9bLA_cv7ojkzClNhavAkZZOW1koVRVlwQL5cNH7wpg3CaaiD1YqjJS7LTuKHDEamLYgEBKyEBcGkRUxG4yiZv89xdJ_8c776ZOT8ejkMXo0EEn8se_AE_TA10_R7Q9v4youDEgYqB2-atoOr2KRrvXlFrebi4s4wYmv_s4N4lgNp8W2njcv62sIpAMqcFPFu32zACC3wMfw7GbT4S8xY71Zb_HdzW8cy_3htnc-8Kj1td_iWMwI_1r6rg75uB4vxoQzvJrIgrTP0NnJ55-fTtOhOkPqgDN1qYPYSlbgEfLCV8pxUooiszkvcq2t5Y5bVTGd26AhRn1pRaY9VQUJv8AN2-w5Oqib2r9EWBInGZgE7Co51aXOnFZM24xUxAKaEsR3ZjJukC4PFTQuDR0UTnfWNcG6ZrBugj6Ml6167Y59FxwHDIwnB-nt2ACANAMgzT5AJkhPEWS6OPNS9WVSTLbnDxzu4GYGX9IalgsR1ssp3PrdeBi8QFjasbVvNnCOBN4F3pvIBL3o0Tn2IhNhAzahCcpnuJ11c36kXi6i0rgCvsky_up_vJfX6CELW0eiSOYhOujWG_8GCF1XvI3f7h_KhEm0
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3NbtQwELZge-GCQPylFGQkrqGOkzj2CbGoVUGiQhVFvVmO4-yu1CZLkq20N96Bt-FxeBLGjpNuKkRvKyfZOJoffzMef4PQW2bSqCAMDCkryjDhELNyo2kIYCNS3FAYdQWyp-zkPPl8kV74hFvryyoHn-gcdVFrmyM_pFma2l3DiL5f_wht1yi7u-pbaNxHe-CCOZ-hvfnR6dezMcsCNmRXzOHoDieHNLKIOyUQGlIbH1qylXSyKDnu_lvMpf_Cn7fLKHfWpeNH6KEHlPhDrwGP0T1TPUG_z4xyu7mwMGGAePiqbju8ds26msstbjeLhUt04qubHCF2XXFarKrp8Kq6hoDaageuS_dvXxQokl7iOby73nT4k6tcr5st_vPzF3Zt_3DbOyF4VXNtttg1NcLfV6arbF2uwcux8Ayvd-hB2qfo_Pjo28eT0HdpCDVgpy7UEGOxEjxDlpuS64QUaR6rLMkzIZRKdKJ4SUWmLJdYZAqVxsJEPCf2F7hjFT9Ds6quzAuEGdGMgkh4mbMkEoWIteBUqJiURIFWBSgZxCS1pzC3nTQuZeSZTgfpSitd6aUboHfjY-uew-OuB-ZWB8abLQW3G6ibhfQWLUlGNRdRqktY4QstFMs5TLzIqUXFmgZI7GqQ7FwGpuzbpcj4jgkcDOomvU9p5Y0FBOjNeBm8gd3iUZWpN3APA_wFXpywAD3vtXP8iji1B7FJFKBsoreTz5xeqVZLxzjOAXfSONn__7ReogfUHg5xNJgHaNY1G_MKIFuXv_Z2-ReOI0J8
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Reassessing the most popularly suggested measurement models and measurement invariance of the Maslach Burnout Inventory - human service survey among Vietnamese healthcare professionals
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21642850.2021.2019585
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003901
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2755672712
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2618507006
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8741234
https://doaj.org/article/072c8915cf284dc9a6b88fbdb20519c2
Volume 10
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELagvXBBIF4LZWUkrgHbSRz7yEKrhYqqWlEEp8hx7N2V2mSVZCvtP-vP69h5sKlAPXBLnDiJM-N5efwNQu-5iWlOOEykJLdBJMBnFUazAIwNqoRh0OoTZM_4_CL69ivuswnrLq3S-dC2BYrwstpNbpXVfUbcR0ad0RwT8O6Yc_EcXkr8EB2CJiauiAH5PR_CLDCJnMrs9-78q_dIK3nw_jvQpX8zQO_mUe4pppMn6HFnUeJPLQs8RQ9M8QzdLIzyy7mgmTDYePiqrBu88dW6qssdrrfLpY904qs_QULsy-LUGH7MqHldXINH7dgDl9Y_7bsCTtIrPIN3l9sGf_Wp62W1wwH2Vf9w3cogeFF1bXbY1zTCP9emKVxarsGrIe8Mb_bQQern6OLk-MfnedAVaQg0mE5NoMHF4hYEQ5IZK3RE8jgLVRJliZRKRTpSwjKZKAclRk2u4lAaKjLijkAaq_AFOijKwrxCmBPNGRBE2IxHVOYy1FIwqUJiiQKmmqCoJ1KqOwRzV0jjMqUd0GlP29TRNu1oO0Efhm6bFsLjvg4zxwHDzQ6B2zeU1TLtJnRKEqaFpLG2oOBzLRXPBHx4njFnFGs2QXKff9LGB2BsWy0lDe_5gKOe2dJOpNQpS-LYLZtTePS74TIIA7fCowpTbuEeDuYXCHHCJ-hly5vDKMLY7cMmdIKSEdeOhjm-UqxXHnBcgNnJwuj1fwzpDXrE3MYRD5F5hA6aamvegjnXZFM_YafocHZ8dr6Y-qAInC2-nJ6f3gJ8IEi_
linkProvider Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3LbtQwFLXKdAEbBOKVUsBIsAx1nMSxFwgx0GqGtiNUtai74DjOzEhtMkwyRbPjH_gPPoDP4Uu4dh6dqRBddRc5L1v3-D7s63sQesV06KWEwUSK0swNOMSsXCvqgrPhSa4ptNoE2REbnASfTsPTDfSrPQtj0ipbnWgVdVoos0a-Q6MwNLuGHn03--Ya1iizu9pSaNSw2NfL7xCylW-HH0G-rynd2z3-MHAbVgFXga2vXAUxAcsAyVGiM64CkoaJL6MgiYSQMlCB5BkVkTS1rzydytAX2uMJMVegPqQP372FNgOfEdpDm_3d0eejblUH5qyx0O1RIU52qGc8_JBAKEpNPGqKu4RrRtByBVyplPovf_dq2uaKHdy7h-42Dix-XyPuPtrQ-QP0-0hLu3sMhhCDS4nPi7LCM0sONj9b4nIxHtuFVXx-uSaJLQtPiWW-3jzNLyCAN2jERWa_digBuGqC-_DvYlHhoc2UL-ZL_OfHT2xpBnFZKz341fxCL7ElUcJfprrKTR6wxpMu0Q3PVsqRlA_RyY3I7xHq5UWunyDMiGIURMKzhAWeSIWvBKdC-iQjElDsoKAVU6yakumGueMs9prKqq10YyPduJGug950r83qmiHXvdA3GOgeNiW_bUMxH8eNBolJRBUXXqgy8ChSJSRLOHQ8TajxwhV1kFhFUFzZFZ-spmeJ_Ws6sN3CLW50WBlfzjgHvexug_YxW0oy18UCnmHg74HVIMxBj2t0dqPwQ3Pwm3gOitZwuzbM9Tv5dGIrnHPwc6kfbP2_Wy_Q7cHx4UF8MBztP0V3qDmYYktwbqNeNV_oZ-AuVsnzZo5i9PWm1cJfzKp_Dw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lj9MwELZgkRAXBOIVWMBIXAO2Eyf2kQWqLo8VQiyCk-U4dltpN6mSdKX-M34eY-dBuwLtgVvlxEncGc98Y4-_QehlZjktSQYTKS9dnAqIWYU1LAawQbWwDFpDguxJNj9NP_zgYzZhO6RV-hja9UQRwVb7yb0u3ZgR95pRD5o5geiO-RDP86Xw6-gGB9_rqzeQn_NpmQUmkXeZ49mdf_Xe80qBvP8SdenfAOjlPModxzS7g24PiBK_6VXgLrpmq3vo11erw3YueCYMGA-f122H16FaV3O2xe1msQgrnfj8zyIhDmVxWgx_zF7zqrqAiNqrB65deNpnDZpklvgI3l1vOnwcUtfrZotjHKr-4ba3QfCi5sJucahphL-vbFf5tFyLl1PeGV7vsIO099Hp7P23t_N4KNIQG4BOXWwgxMocGIa8sE6YlJS8SHSeFrmUWqcm1cIxmWtPJUZtqXkiLRUF8b_AGuvkATqo6so-QjgjJmMgEOGKLKWylImRgkmdEEc0KFWE0lFIygwM5r6QxpmiA9HpKFvlZasG2Ubo1dRt3VN4XNXhyGvAdLNn4A4NdbNQw4RWJGdGSMqNAwdfGqmzQsCHlwXzoNiwCMld_VFdWIBxfbUUlVzxAYejsqnBpLSK5Zz7bXMKj34xXQZj4Hd4dGXrDdyTAfwCI06yCD3sdXMaRcL9OWxCI5Tvae3eMPevVKtlIBwXADtZkj7-jyE9Rze_vJupT8cnH5-gW8yfIQlsmYfooGs29ikgu654Fubub7C3Ry4
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reassessing+the+most+popularly+suggested+measurement+models+and+measurement+invariance+of+the+Maslach+Burnout+Inventory+-+human+service+survey+among+Vietnamese+healthcare+professionals&rft.jtitle=Health+psychology+%26+behavioral+medicine&rft.au=Bui%2C+Thi+Hong+Thai&rft.au=Tran%2C+Thi+Minh+Duc&rft.au=Nguyen%2C+Thi+Nhu+Trang&rft.au=Vu%2C+Thy+Cam&rft.date=2022-12-31&rft.issn=2164-2850&rft.eissn=2164-2850&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F21642850.2021.2019585&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2164-2850&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2164-2850&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2164-2850&client=summon