Teacher attitudes about compensation reform Implications for reform implementation

Concerns about the quality of the teacher workforce and the distribution of teacher quality among schools have led to calls to reform teacher compensation. The authors present the results of the 2006 Washington State Teacher Compensation survey on teachers' attitudes about this issue. By linkin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIndustrial & labor relations review Vol. 64; no. 3; pp. 441 - 463
Main Authors Goldhaber, Dan, Dearmond, Michael, Deburgomaster, Scott
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University 01.04.2011
SAGE Publications
Cornell Univ
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0019-7939
2162-271X
DOI10.1177/001979391106400302

Cover

More Information
Summary:Concerns about the quality of the teacher workforce and the distribution of teacher quality among schools have led to calls to reform teacher compensation. The authors present the results of the 2006 Washington State Teacher Compensation survey on teachers' attitudes about this issue. By linking survey results to detailed data on school and district characteristics, they analyze how teacher attitudes differ by individual characteristics such as subject area, school assignment, or experience, as well as workplace characteristics such as school performance and the level of trust among teachers and principals. The results suggest teachers' attitudes toward reform are shaped by self-interest as well as by professional norms of collegiality—two factors that can push teachers' attitudes toward compensation reform in opposite directions. For example, teachers with middle and high school assignments in mathematics and science are more supportive of subject-area bonuses; the more trust that exists among teachers, however, the less teachers support merit pay.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0019-7939
2162-271X
DOI:10.1177/001979391106400302