Clinical use of machine learning‐based pathomics signature for diagnosis and survival prediction of bladder cancer

Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E‐stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross‐verified automat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer science Vol. 112; no. 7; pp. 2905 - 2914
Main Authors Chen, Siteng, Jiang, Liren, Zheng, Xinyi, Shao, Jialiang, Wang, Tao, Zhang, Encheng, Gao, Feng, Wang, Xiang, Zheng, Junhua
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.07.2021
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1347-9032
1349-7006
1349-7006
DOI10.1111/cas.14927

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E‐stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross‐verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning‐based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56‐2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95‐9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications. We extracted quantitative features from H&E‐stained images and used the features to construct bladder cancer diagnostic and prognostic models based on computational recognition of digital pathology. A machine learning histopathological image signature derived from digital pathology demonstrated high accuracy in bladder cancer diagnosis and survival prediction. The findings highlighted the potential clinical utility of machine learning for histopathologic image analysis in bladder cancer.
AbstractList Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E‐stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross‐verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning‐based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56‐2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95‐9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications.
Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E-stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross-verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning-based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95-9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1-, 3-, and 5-y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications.
Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E-stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross-verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning-based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95-9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1-, 3-, and 5-y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications.Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E-stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross-verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning-based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95-9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1-, 3-, and 5-y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications.
Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E‐stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross‐verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning‐based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56‐2.81, P  < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95‐9.59, P  < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications. We extracted quantitative features from H&E‐stained images and used the features to construct bladder cancer diagnostic and prognostic models based on computational recognition of digital pathology. A machine learning histopathological image signature derived from digital pathology demonstrated high accuracy in bladder cancer diagnosis and survival prediction. The findings highlighted the potential clinical utility of machine learning for histopathologic image analysis in bladder cancer.
Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E‐stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross‐verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning‐based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56‐2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95‐9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications. We extracted quantitative features from H&E‐stained images and used the features to construct bladder cancer diagnostic and prognostic models based on computational recognition of digital pathology. A machine learning histopathological image signature derived from digital pathology demonstrated high accuracy in bladder cancer diagnosis and survival prediction. The findings highlighted the potential clinical utility of machine learning for histopathologic image analysis in bladder cancer.
Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E‐stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross‐verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning‐based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56‐2.81, P  < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95‐9.59, P  < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications.
Author Chen, Siteng
Wang, Xiang
Zheng, Xinyi
Zhang, Encheng
Shao, Jialiang
Jiang, Liren
Zheng, Junhua
Wang, Tao
Gao, Feng
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Urology Shanghai General Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
3 Department of Pharmacy Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China
2 Department of Pathology Shanghai General Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Urology Shanghai General Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
– name: 2 Department of Pathology Shanghai General Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China
– name: 3 Department of Pharmacy Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Siteng
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Siteng
  organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Liren
  surname: Jiang
  fullname: Jiang, Liren
  organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Xinyi
  surname: Zheng
  fullname: Zheng, Xinyi
  organization: Fudan University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jialiang
  surname: Shao
  fullname: Shao, Jialiang
  organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Tao
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Tao
  organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Encheng
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Encheng
  organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Feng
  surname: Gao
  fullname: Gao, Feng
  email: feng.gao@shgh.cn
  organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Xiang
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5538-4310
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Xiang
  email: seanw_hs@163.com
  organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Junhua
  surname: Zheng
  fullname: Zheng, Junhua
  email: zhengjh0471@sina.com
  organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9ks2KFDEQgBtZcX_04AtIwIseeje_neQiLIN_sOBBPYfqJD2TpScZk-6RvfkIPqNPYmZnVnRRc6lAffVRldRpcxRT9E3zlOBzUs-FhXJOuKbyQXNCGNetxLg7ur3LVmNGj5vTUq4xZh3X_FFzzJhmRFNx0kyLMcRgYURz8SgNaA12FaJHo4ccQ1z--Pa9h-Id2sC0SutgCyphGWGas0dDysgFWMZUQkEQHSpz3oZt1W2yd8FOIcWdtR_BOZ-RhWh9ftw8HGAs_skhnjWf37z-tHjXXn14-35xedVa0RHZEkdgEKonUkvsO8trVG7QTDvJCeugVwwzpWpKCQUccC_0UBniJKOVO2te7b2buV97Z32cMoxmk8Ma8o1JEMyfmRhWZpm2RlHBqGZV8OIgyOnL7Mtk1qFYP44QfZqLoYJiJTjXoqLP76HXac6xjlcpXRtVjJL_U1wKiSmllXr2e9-_Gr77tgpc7AGbUynZD8aGCXaPXccIoyHY7BbD1MUwt4tRK17eq7iT_o092L-G0d_8GzSLy4_7ip_yK8h0
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e38562
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_80292_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00414_023_03136_5
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000001222
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_critrevonc_2022_103601
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_77101_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00262_024_03829_9
crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering11121230
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_022_09783_y
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1166245
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_024_13328_w
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_16748
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_7374
crossref_primary_10_1111_cas_15395
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14184449
crossref_primary_10_1002_cnr2_70138
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e24371
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjonc_2023_000134
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1509362
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_imu_2024_101581
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_modpat_2024_100631
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1227152
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15184518
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jprot_2024_105180
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bspc_2024_107431
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14205019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tranon_2024_101985
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_023_05574_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_annepidem_2024_12_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_artmed_2023_102740
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_1077118
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semradonc_2022_10_009
crossref_primary_10_1111_exsy_13666
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12967_024_05382_6
crossref_primary_10_1002_cnr2_1860
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_engappai_2024_109972
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_023_03095_z
crossref_primary_10_29109_gujsc_1232028
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12672_023_00801_4
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_023_10817_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedinformatics3010008
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1477166
Cites_doi 10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100
10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.12.026
10.6004/jnccn.2018.0072
10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.023
10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.028
10.1001/jama.2017.14585
10.1038/s41591-020-1034-x
10.1038/ncomms12474
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1510
10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036
10.1093/bioinformatics/btr095
10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.029
10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141
10.1148/radiol.2015151169
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003778
10.1016/j.media.2016.06.037
10.7150/thno.49864
10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30098-1
10.18637/jss.v033.i01
10.1038/s41591-020-1037-7
10.18637/jss.v039.i05
10.3322/caac.21590
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
– notice: 2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
– notice: 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1111/cas.14927
DatabaseName Wiley Online Library Open Access
CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biological Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic

Publicly Available Content Database

CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access (Activated by CARLI)
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
DocumentTitleAlternate CHEN et al
EISSN 1349-7006
EndPage 2914
ExternalDocumentID PMC8253293
33931925
10_1111_cas_14927
CAS14927
Genre article
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China
  funderid: 81972393; 81772705
– fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China
  grantid: 81772705
– fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China
  grantid: 81972393
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 81972393; 81772705
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.55
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
24P
29B
2WC
31~
36B
3O-
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
7.U
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8FE
8FH
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAHHS
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABEML
ACCFJ
ACCMX
ACSCC
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADKYN
ADPDF
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AENEX
AEQDE
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFZJQ
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AOIJS
AVUZU
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFHJK
BHPHI
BY8
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DIK
DR2
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FIJ
GODZA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HCIFZ
HF~
HOLLA
HYE
HZI
HZ~
IAO
IHR
IPNFZ
ITC
IX1
J0M
K.9
K48
KQ8
LC2
LC3
LH4
LK8
LP6
LP7
LW6
M7P
MK4
N04
N05
N9A
O9-
OIG
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PIMPY
PROAC
Q11
ROL
RPM
RX1
SJN
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
UB1
W8V
WIN
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WXI
X7M
XG1
ZXP
~IA
~WT
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABUWG
CITATION
FYUFA
HMCUK
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PSQYO
UKHRP
NPM
3V.
7XB
8FK
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5617-1d1af58b17970e6c47978df939d74136ab830388e6c858a4a0b59f9781d732f93
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1347-9032
1349-7006
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:25:21 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 18:15:24 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 08:39:32 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 06:24:08 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:28:04 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:48 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:31:11 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:28:30 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Keywords diagnosis
pathomics
machine learning
prognosis
bladder cancer
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial
2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5617-1d1af58b17970e6c47978df939d74136ab830388e6c858a4a0b59f9781d732f93
Notes Siteng Chen, Liren Jiang, and Xinyi Zheng are equal contributors and co‐first authors.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-5538-4310
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2598308321?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 33931925
PQID 2547570222
PQPubID 4378882
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8253293
proquest_miscellaneous_2520854495
proquest_journals_2598308321
proquest_journals_2547570222
pubmed_primary_33931925
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_cas_14927
crossref_primary_10_1111_cas_14927
wiley_primary_10_1111_cas_14927_CAS14927
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate July 2021
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2021
  text: July 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Tokyo
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Cancer science
PublicationTitleAlternate Cancer Sci
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
– name: John Wiley and Sons Inc
References 2017; 318
2010; 33
2016; 7
2019; 20
2017; 14
2020
2020; 70
2017; 23
2016; 278
2006; 7
2020; 26
2019; 119
2016; 70
2012; 48
2020; 10
2011; 39
2018; 34
2011; 27
2018; 27
2018; 16
2016; 33
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_21_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
References_xml – volume: 26
  start-page: 1351
  year: 2020
  end-page: 1363
  article-title: Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT‐AI extension
  publication-title: Nat Med
– volume: 14
  start-page: 749
  year: 2017
  end-page: 762
  article-title: Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine
  publication-title: Nat Rev Clin Oncol
– volume: 20
  start-page: 728
  year: 2019
  end-page: 740
  article-title: Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro‐oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
– volume: 70
  start-page: 106
  year: 2016
  end-page: 119
  article-title: The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs‐part B: prostate and bladder tumours
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 27
  start-page: 317
  year: 2018
  end-page: 328
  article-title: Deep convolutional neural networks enable discrimination of heterogeneous digital pathology images
  publication-title: EBioMedicine
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1179
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1180
  article-title: Improved structure, function and compatibility for cell profiler: modular high‐throughput image analysis software
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
– volume: 33
  start-page: 170
  year: 2016
  end-page: 175
  article-title: Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: challenges and opportunities
  publication-title: Med Image Anal
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1041
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1053
  article-title: NCCN guidelines insights: bladder cancer, version 5.2018
  publication-title: J Natl Compr Canc Netw
– volume: 34
  start-page: 76
  year: 2018
  end-page: 84
  article-title: Development and validation of an MRI‐based radiomics signature for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in bladder cancer
  publication-title: EBioMedicine
– volume: 70
  start-page: 7
  year: 2020
  end-page: 30
  article-title: Cancer statistics, 2020
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
– year: 2020
  article-title: Development and validation of a deep learning CT signature to predict survival and chemotherapy benefit in gastric cancer: a multicenter, retrospective study
  publication-title: Ann Surg
– volume: 48
  start-page: 441
  year: 2012
  end-page: 446
  article-title: Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1
  year: 2011
  end-page: 13
  article-title: Regularization paths for Cox's proportional hazards model via coordinate descent
  publication-title: J Stat Softw
– volume: 23
  start-page: 6904
  year: 2017
  end-page: 6911
  article-title: A radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in bladder cancer
  publication-title: Clin Cancer Res
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1364
  year: 2020
  end-page: 1374
  article-title: Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT‐AI extension
  publication-title: Nat Med
– volume: 7
  start-page: R100
  year: 2006
  article-title: Cell Profiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes
  publication-title: Genome Biol
– volume: 10
  start-page: 11080
  year: 2020
  end-page: 11091
  article-title: Development and interpretation of a patho‐mics‐based model for the prediction of microsatellite instability in Colorectal Cancer
  publication-title: Theranostics
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 22
  article-title: Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent
  publication-title: J Stat Softw
– volume: 7
  start-page: 12474
  year: 2016
  article-title: Predicting non‐small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features
  publication-title: Nat Commun
– volume: 278
  start-page: 563
  year: 2016
  end-page: 677
  article-title: Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 119
  start-page: 11
  year: 2019
  end-page: 17
  article-title: Deep neural networks are superior to dermatologists in melanoma image classification
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
– volume: 318
  start-page: 2199
  year: 2017
  end-page: 2210
  article-title: Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer
  publication-title: JAMA
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.12.026
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0072
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.023
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.028
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14585
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1034-x
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1038/ncomms12474
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1510
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr095
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.029
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003778
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.06.037
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.7150/thno.49864
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30098-1
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v033.i01
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1037-7
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v039.i05
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21590
SSID ssj0036494
Score 2.52638
Snippet Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 2905
SubjectTerms Bladder cancer
Cancer
Cystitis
Diagnosis
Genomes
Histopathology
Learning algorithms
Machine learning
Medical prognosis
Original
Pathology
pathomics
Patients
Predictions
prognosis
Survival
Tumors
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  dbid: 24P
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1La9tAEB5SB0IvoXm0ceqEbcghF4Gs3dVK5BRCQyg4FNpAbmJXu9sGHNlY9j0_Ib8xvyQzqwcxaaAnC2YsS5rHfmPNfgNw6rn0hhsTGedVJIxKIy2lj3CtlU55q7Si_c6Tm_T6Vvy4k3cbcN7thWn4Ifo_3CgyQr6mANemfhXkNBIM4X2iPsAmba0lJ0_Ezy4N81TkzURboaI85klLK0RtPP1X1xejNwjzbaPkawAbVqCrT7DdQkd20dh6BzZctQtbk_bl-B4sW47PKVvVjs08ewiNko61kyH-PD8-0aJlGY0hpt3INaP2jUDtyRC8Mtv03d3XTFeW1StMI-iIbL6g3yAL0lnNlJLVgpXkL4t9uL36_vvyOmqHKkQlQiUVje1Ye5kZDEQVu7QU-JlZn_PcIrjgqTYZJ4YYFGUy00LHRuaemLGs4gnqfYZBNavcAbCyNEYkZax97oRyNovLsXfc6tSndpylQzjrnm5RtozjNPhiWnSVBxqiCIYYwkmvOm9oNv6lNOpMVLSRVhdY4CqpqGx9R5zj_dA4piF868UYQvReRFdutiIdGlQqsFQcwpfG4P1FcJ5jkkpQotZcoVcgeu51SXX_N9B0Y-3NEUzhUwhO8_59FZcXv8LB4f-rfoWPCXXXhMbhEQyWi5U7Qni0NMchDF4AF3QOow
  priority: 102
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
Title Clinical use of machine learning‐based pathomics signature for diagnosis and survival prediction of bladder cancer
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcas.14927
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931925
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2547570222
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2598308321
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2520854495
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8253293
Volume 112
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3NTtwwELYKSFUvVf-7FFZu1UMvVrOxHSenChAIIYEQLdLeIv8WpG12u9m98wh9xj5JZxwnAlG47K40o2TjGY9n7Mn3EfI5cBkMN4YZHxQTRhVMSxkYrLXSq-CUVvi-8-lZcXwpTqZymjbc2tRW2cfEGKjd3OIe-VdI00ueIa_Ot8VvhqxReLqaKDQ2yBZCl2HxpaZDwcULUXWktkKxKuN5QhbCTh4kFIPiAMlkbq9H95LM-72St3PYuAgdvSDPU_ZI9zpzvyRPfPOKPD1N5-OvySrBfM7ouvV0Huiv2CvpaSKH-Pn35g-uW44iEzG-kNxS7OCI6J4U8lfquta765bqxtF2DZEEfJEulngPNCJe1cwwXi2pRZdZviGXR4c_Do5Z4lVgFrIlxSZuooMsDcxFlfnCCvguXah45SC_4IU2MNK8LEFUylILnRlZBQTHcornoPeWbDbzxr8n1FpjRG4zHSovlHdlZifBc6eLULhJWYzIl350a5tAx5H7Ylb3xQcYoo6GGJFPg-qiQ9r4n9JOb6I6Tba2hhpXSYWV6wPi3nNG5OMghlmERyO68fM16iBXqYBqcUTedQYf_gTnFcSpHCTqjisMCojQfVfSXF9FpG4ovznkUzAK0Wkefq76YO97_LH9-BN8IM9ybKqJ_cI7ZHO1XPtdyIpWZkw2cnE-jhNgTLb2D8_OL8ZxhwE_L_J_W_ES8A
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqIgEXRHkulGIQSFwssnEcOweEqkK1pd1eaKW9BT-h0pJdNruqeuMn8Ev4UfwSZpyHWpVy62kjjZVsPON5xJ_nI-RV4CIYbgwzPkiWGZkzLURgEGuFl8FJLfG88_gwHx1nnyZiskZ-d2dhEFbZ-cToqN3M4jfyt5CmK54gr877-Q-GrFG4u9pRaDRmse_PTqFkq9_tfQD9vk7T3Y9HOyPWsgowC7mCZEM31EEoA5YoE5_bDH6VCwUvHERXnmsDz-FKgUgJpTOdGFEEbA3lJE8DNl8Cl38DAm-CEEI56Qs8nmdFQ6KbSVYkPG07GSFyCAnMoBhB8prz8e9SUnsZm3k-Z45Bb_cuudNmq3S7Ma8Nsuare-TmuN2Pv0-WbVvRKV3Vns4C_R6xmZ62ZBRf__z8hXHSUWQ-xgPQNUXESOwmSiFfpq6B-p3UVFeO1ivwXGD7dL7AZ6DR4F3NFP3jglo00cUDcnwtM_6QrFezyj8m1FpjstQmOhQ-k96pxA6D507nIXdDlQ_Im252S9s2OUeujWnZFTugiDIqYkBe9kPnTWePfw3a7FRUtou7LqGmlkJipXyFuLPUAXnRi2HV4laMrvxshWOQGzWD6nRAHjUK7_8E5wX4xRQk8oIp9AOwI_hFSXXyLXYGh3KfQ_4GsxCN5ur3Kne2P8eLJ_9_g-fk1uhofFAe7B3uPyW3UwT0RKzyJllfLlb-GWRkS7MVlwElX6573f0FXnZJRg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ba9RAFB5KC8UXsV5Xqx1FwZeh2cxMJnkQKW2X1toiaGHf4lxrYc2um13EN3-Cv8ef4y_xnMmFllrf-pTAGZLMnHvmzPkIeRm4DIYbw4wPigmjMqalDAx8rfQqOKUVnnc-PskOTsW7sRyvkN_dWRgsq-xsYjTUbmrxH_k2hOk5TxBXZzu0ZREf9kZvZ98YIkjhTmsHp9GIyJH_8R3St_rN4R7w-lWajvY_7R6wFmGAWYgbFBu6oQ4yNyCVKvGZFXDNXSh44cDT8kwbeCfPcyDlMtdCJ0YWAdtEOcXTgI2YwPyvKQ5uE3RJjftkj2eiaAB1hWJFwtO2qxFWESGYGSQmCGRz0RdeCXCv1mlejJ-jAxzdIbfbyJXuNKK2QVZ8dZesH7d78_fIom0xOqHL2tNpoF9jnaanLTDF2Z-fv9BnOoooyHgYuqZYPRI7i1KInalryv7Oa6orR-slWDHQAzqb4ztQgPCpZoK2ck4tiuv8Pjm9kRV_QFaraeUfEWqtMSK1iQ6FF8q7PLHD4LnTWcjcMM8G5HW3uqVtG54j7sak7BIfYEQZGTEgL_qhs6bLx78GbXYsKltFr0vIr5VUmDVfQ-6kdkCe92TQYNyW0ZWfLnEM4qQKyFQH5GHD8P4jOC_ARqZAUZdEoR-A3cEvU6rzL7FLOKT-HGI5WIUoNNfPq9zd-RhvHv9_BltkHTSufH94cvSE3EqxtieWLW-S1cV86Z9CcLYwz6IWUPL5ptXuL6d-TXw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+use+of+machine+learning%E2%80%90based+pathomics+signature+for+diagnosis+and+survival+prediction+of+bladder+cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer+science&rft.au=Chen%2C+Siteng&rft.au=Jiang%2C+Liren&rft.au=Zheng%2C+Xinyi&rft.au=Shao%2C+Jialiang&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+%26+Sons%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1347-9032&rft.eissn=1349-7006&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2905&rft.epage=2914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fcas.14927&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1347-9032&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1347-9032&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1347-9032&client=summon