Clinical use of machine learning‐based pathomics signature for diagnosis and survival prediction of bladder cancer
Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E‐stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross‐verified automat...
Saved in:
Published in | Cancer science Vol. 112; no. 7; pp. 2905 - 2914 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.07.2021
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1347-9032 1349-7006 1349-7006 |
DOI | 10.1111/cas.14927 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E‐stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross‐verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning‐based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56‐2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95‐9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications.
We extracted quantitative features from H&E‐stained images and used the features to construct bladder cancer diagnostic and prognostic models based on computational recognition of digital pathology. A machine learning histopathological image signature derived from digital pathology demonstrated high accuracy in bladder cancer diagnosis and survival prediction. The findings highlighted the potential clinical utility of machine learning for histopathologic image analysis in bladder cancer. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E‐stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross‐verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning‐based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56‐2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95‐9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications. Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E-stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross-verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning-based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95-9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1-, 3-, and 5-y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications. Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E-stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross-verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning-based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95-9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1-, 3-, and 5-y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications.Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E-stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross-verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning-based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56-2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95-9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1-, 3-, and 5-y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications. Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E‐stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross‐verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning‐based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56‐2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95‐9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications. We extracted quantitative features from H&E‐stained images and used the features to construct bladder cancer diagnostic and prognostic models based on computational recognition of digital pathology. A machine learning histopathological image signature derived from digital pathology demonstrated high accuracy in bladder cancer diagnosis and survival prediction. The findings highlighted the potential clinical utility of machine learning for histopathologic image analysis in bladder cancer. Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E‐stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross‐verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning‐based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56‐2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95‐9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications. We extracted quantitative features from H&E‐stained images and used the features to construct bladder cancer diagnostic and prognostic models based on computational recognition of digital pathology. A machine learning histopathological image signature derived from digital pathology demonstrated high accuracy in bladder cancer diagnosis and survival prediction. The findings highlighted the potential clinical utility of machine learning for histopathologic image analysis in bladder cancer. Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We collected 643 H&E‐stained BCa images from Shanghai General Hospital and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed and cross‐verified automatic diagnosis and prognosis models by performing a machine learning algorithm based on pathomics data. Our study indicated that high diagnostic efficiency of the machine learning‐based diagnosis model was observed in patients with BCa, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.3%, 89.2%, and 94.1% in the training cohort, test cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively. Our diagnosis model also performed well in distinguishing patients with BCa from patients with glandular cystitis, with an AUC value of 93.4% in the General cohort. Significant differences were found in overall survival in TCGA cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.56‐2.81, P < .0001) and the General cohort (HR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.95‐9.59, P < .0001) comparing patients with BCa of high risk vs low risk stratified by risk score, which was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for BCa. The integration nomogram based on our risk score and clinicopathologic characters displayed higher prediction accuracy than current tumor stage/grade systems, with AUC values of 77.7%, 83.8%, and 81.3% for 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐y overall survival prediction of patients with BCa. However, prospective studies are still needed for further verifications. |
Author | Chen, Siteng Wang, Xiang Zheng, Xinyi Zhang, Encheng Shao, Jialiang Jiang, Liren Zheng, Junhua Wang, Tao Gao, Feng |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Urology Shanghai General Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China 3 Department of Pharmacy Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China 2 Department of Pathology Shanghai General Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Urology Shanghai General Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China – name: 2 Department of Pathology Shanghai General Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China – name: 3 Department of Pharmacy Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Siteng surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Siteng organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine – sequence: 2 givenname: Liren surname: Jiang fullname: Jiang, Liren organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine – sequence: 3 givenname: Xinyi surname: Zheng fullname: Zheng, Xinyi organization: Fudan University – sequence: 4 givenname: Jialiang surname: Shao fullname: Shao, Jialiang organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine – sequence: 5 givenname: Tao surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Tao organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine – sequence: 6 givenname: Encheng surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Encheng organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine – sequence: 7 givenname: Feng surname: Gao fullname: Gao, Feng email: feng.gao@shgh.cn organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine – sequence: 8 givenname: Xiang orcidid: 0000-0001-5538-4310 surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Xiang email: seanw_hs@163.com organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine – sequence: 9 givenname: Junhua surname: Zheng fullname: Zheng, Junhua email: zhengjh0471@sina.com organization: Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9ks2KFDEQgBtZcX_04AtIwIseeje_neQiLIN_sOBBPYfqJD2TpScZk-6RvfkIPqNPYmZnVnRRc6lAffVRldRpcxRT9E3zlOBzUs-FhXJOuKbyQXNCGNetxLg7ur3LVmNGj5vTUq4xZh3X_FFzzJhmRFNx0kyLMcRgYURz8SgNaA12FaJHo4ccQ1z--Pa9h-Id2sC0SutgCyphGWGas0dDysgFWMZUQkEQHSpz3oZt1W2yd8FOIcWdtR_BOZ-RhWh9ftw8HGAs_skhnjWf37z-tHjXXn14-35xedVa0RHZEkdgEKonUkvsO8trVG7QTDvJCeugVwwzpWpKCQUccC_0UBniJKOVO2te7b2buV97Z32cMoxmk8Ma8o1JEMyfmRhWZpm2RlHBqGZV8OIgyOnL7Mtk1qFYP44QfZqLoYJiJTjXoqLP76HXac6xjlcpXRtVjJL_U1wKiSmllXr2e9-_Gr77tgpc7AGbUynZD8aGCXaPXccIoyHY7BbD1MUwt4tRK17eq7iT_o092L-G0d_8GzSLy4_7ip_yK8h0 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e38562 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_80292_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00414_023_03136_5 crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000001222 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_critrevonc_2022_103601 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_77101_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00262_024_03829_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering11121230 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_022_09783_y crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1166245 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_024_13328_w crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_16748 crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_7374 crossref_primary_10_1111_cas_15395 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14184449 crossref_primary_10_1002_cnr2_70138 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e24371 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjonc_2023_000134 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1509362 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_imu_2024_101581 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_modpat_2024_100631 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1227152 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15184518 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jprot_2024_105180 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bspc_2024_107431 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14205019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tranon_2024_101985 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_023_05574_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_annepidem_2024_12_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_artmed_2023_102740 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_1077118 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semradonc_2022_10_009 crossref_primary_10_1111_exsy_13666 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12967_024_05382_6 crossref_primary_10_1002_cnr2_1860 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_engappai_2024_109972 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_023_03095_z crossref_primary_10_29109_gujsc_1232028 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12672_023_00801_4 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_023_10817_2 crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedinformatics3010008 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1477166 |
Cites_doi | 10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.12.026 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0072 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.023 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.028 10.1001/jama.2017.14585 10.1038/s41591-020-1034-x 10.1038/ncomms12474 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1510 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr095 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.029 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141 10.1148/radiol.2015151169 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003778 10.1016/j.media.2016.06.037 10.7150/thno.49864 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30098-1 10.18637/jss.v033.i01 10.1038/s41591-020-1037-7 10.18637/jss.v039.i05 10.3322/caac.21590 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. 2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. – notice: 2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. – notice: 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. LK8 M0S M1P M7P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1111/cas.14927 |
DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biological Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Biological Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access (Activated by CARLI) url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
DocumentTitleAlternate | CHEN et al |
EISSN | 1349-7006 |
EndPage | 2914 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC8253293 33931925 10_1111_cas_14927 CAS14927 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China funderid: 81972393; 81772705 – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China grantid: 81772705 – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China grantid: 81972393 – fundername: ; grantid: 81972393; 81772705 |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .55 .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 24P 29B 2WC 31~ 36B 3O- 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 7.U 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8FE 8FH 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAHHS AAZKR ABCQN ABEML ACCFJ ACCMX ACSCC ACXQS ADBBV ADKYN ADPDF ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AENEX AEQDE AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFKRA AFPKN AFZJQ AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AOIJS AVUZU BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFHJK BHPHI BY8 CAG CCPQU COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DIK DR2 DU5 E3Z EBS EJD EMB EMOBN EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FIJ GODZA GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ HF~ HOLLA HYE HZI HZ~ IAO IHR IPNFZ ITC IX1 J0M K.9 K48 KQ8 LC2 LC3 LH4 LK8 LP6 LP7 LW6 M7P MK4 N04 N05 N9A O9- OIG OK1 OVD P2P P2X P2Z P4B P4D PIMPY PROAC Q11 ROL RPM RX1 SJN SUPJJ SV3 TEORI UB1 W8V WIN WOW WQJ WRC WXI X7M XG1 ZXP ~IA ~WT 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAYXX ABUWG CITATION FYUFA HMCUK M1P PHGZM PHGZT PSQYO UKHRP NPM 3V. 7XB 8FK AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5617-1d1af58b17970e6c47978df939d74136ab830388e6c858a4a0b59f9781d732f93 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1347-9032 1349-7006 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:25:21 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 18:15:24 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 08:39:32 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 06:24:08 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:28:04 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:48 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:31:11 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:28:30 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Keywords | diagnosis pathomics machine learning prognosis bladder cancer |
Language | English |
License | Attribution-NonCommercial 2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5617-1d1af58b17970e6c47978df939d74136ab830388e6c858a4a0b59f9781d732f93 |
Notes | Siteng Chen, Liren Jiang, and Xinyi Zheng are equal contributors and co‐first authors. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-5538-4310 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2598308321?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 33931925 |
PQID | 2547570222 |
PQPubID | 4378882 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8253293 proquest_miscellaneous_2520854495 proquest_journals_2598308321 proquest_journals_2547570222 pubmed_primary_33931925 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_cas_14927 crossref_primary_10_1111_cas_14927 wiley_primary_10_1111_cas_14927_CAS14927 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | July 2021 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2021 text: July 2021 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Tokyo – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | Cancer science |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Cancer Sci |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: John Wiley and Sons Inc |
References | 2017; 318 2010; 33 2016; 7 2019; 20 2017; 14 2020 2020; 70 2017; 23 2016; 278 2006; 7 2020; 26 2019; 119 2016; 70 2012; 48 2020; 10 2011; 39 2018; 34 2011; 27 2018; 27 2018; 16 2016; 33 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 26 start-page: 1351 year: 2020 end-page: 1363 article-title: Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT‐AI extension publication-title: Nat Med – volume: 14 start-page: 749 year: 2017 end-page: 762 article-title: Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine publication-title: Nat Rev Clin Oncol – volume: 20 start-page: 728 year: 2019 end-page: 740 article-title: Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro‐oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study publication-title: Lancet Oncol – volume: 70 start-page: 106 year: 2016 end-page: 119 article-title: The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs‐part B: prostate and bladder tumours publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 27 start-page: 317 year: 2018 end-page: 328 article-title: Deep convolutional neural networks enable discrimination of heterogeneous digital pathology images publication-title: EBioMedicine – volume: 27 start-page: 1179 year: 2011 end-page: 1180 article-title: Improved structure, function and compatibility for cell profiler: modular high‐throughput image analysis software publication-title: Bioinformatics – volume: 33 start-page: 170 year: 2016 end-page: 175 article-title: Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: challenges and opportunities publication-title: Med Image Anal – volume: 16 start-page: 1041 year: 2018 end-page: 1053 article-title: NCCN guidelines insights: bladder cancer, version 5.2018 publication-title: J Natl Compr Canc Netw – volume: 34 start-page: 76 year: 2018 end-page: 84 article-title: Development and validation of an MRI‐based radiomics signature for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in bladder cancer publication-title: EBioMedicine – volume: 70 start-page: 7 year: 2020 end-page: 30 article-title: Cancer statistics, 2020 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin – year: 2020 article-title: Development and validation of a deep learning CT signature to predict survival and chemotherapy benefit in gastric cancer: a multicenter, retrospective study publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 48 start-page: 441 year: 2012 end-page: 446 article-title: Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis publication-title: Eur J Cancer – volume: 39 start-page: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 13 article-title: Regularization paths for Cox's proportional hazards model via coordinate descent publication-title: J Stat Softw – volume: 23 start-page: 6904 year: 2017 end-page: 6911 article-title: A radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in bladder cancer publication-title: Clin Cancer Res – volume: 26 start-page: 1364 year: 2020 end-page: 1374 article-title: Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT‐AI extension publication-title: Nat Med – volume: 7 start-page: R100 year: 2006 article-title: Cell Profiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes publication-title: Genome Biol – volume: 10 start-page: 11080 year: 2020 end-page: 11091 article-title: Development and interpretation of a patho‐mics‐based model for the prediction of microsatellite instability in Colorectal Cancer publication-title: Theranostics – volume: 33 start-page: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 22 article-title: Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent publication-title: J Stat Softw – volume: 7 start-page: 12474 year: 2016 article-title: Predicting non‐small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features publication-title: Nat Commun – volume: 278 start-page: 563 year: 2016 end-page: 677 article-title: Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data publication-title: Radiology – volume: 119 start-page: 11 year: 2019 end-page: 17 article-title: Deep neural networks are superior to dermatologists in melanoma image classification publication-title: Eur J Cancer – volume: 318 start-page: 2199 year: 2017 end-page: 2210 article-title: Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer publication-title: JAMA – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.12.026 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0072 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.023 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.028 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14585 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1034-x – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12474 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1510 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr095 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.029 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003778 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.06.037 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.7150/thno.49864 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30098-1 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.18637/jss.v033.i01 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1037-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.18637/jss.v039.i05 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.3322/caac.21590 |
SSID | ssj0036494 |
Score | 2.52638 |
Snippet | Traditional histopathology performed by pathologists by the naked eye is insufficient for accurate and efficient diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). We... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 2905 |
SubjectTerms | Bladder cancer Cancer Cystitis Diagnosis Genomes Histopathology Learning algorithms Machine learning Medical prognosis Original Pathology pathomics Patients Predictions prognosis Survival Tumors |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Wiley Online Library Open Access dbid: 24P link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1La9tAEB5SB0IvoXm0ceqEbcghF4Gs3dVK5BRCQyg4FNpAbmJXu9sGHNlY9j0_Ib8xvyQzqwcxaaAnC2YsS5rHfmPNfgNw6rn0hhsTGedVJIxKIy2lj3CtlU55q7Si_c6Tm_T6Vvy4k3cbcN7thWn4Ifo_3CgyQr6mANemfhXkNBIM4X2iPsAmba0lJ0_Ezy4N81TkzURboaI85klLK0RtPP1X1xejNwjzbaPkawAbVqCrT7DdQkd20dh6BzZctQtbk_bl-B4sW47PKVvVjs08ewiNko61kyH-PD8-0aJlGY0hpt3INaP2jUDtyRC8Mtv03d3XTFeW1StMI-iIbL6g3yAL0lnNlJLVgpXkL4t9uL36_vvyOmqHKkQlQiUVje1Ye5kZDEQVu7QU-JlZn_PcIrjgqTYZJ4YYFGUy00LHRuaemLGs4gnqfYZBNavcAbCyNEYkZax97oRyNovLsXfc6tSndpylQzjrnm5RtozjNPhiWnSVBxqiCIYYwkmvOm9oNv6lNOpMVLSRVhdY4CqpqGx9R5zj_dA4piF868UYQvReRFdutiIdGlQqsFQcwpfG4P1FcJ5jkkpQotZcoVcgeu51SXX_N9B0Y-3NEUzhUwhO8_59FZcXv8LB4f-rfoWPCXXXhMbhEQyWi5U7Qni0NMchDF4AF3QOow priority: 102 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
Title | Clinical use of machine learning‐based pathomics signature for diagnosis and survival prediction of bladder cancer |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcas.14927 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931925 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2547570222 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2598308321 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2520854495 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8253293 |
Volume | 112 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3NTtwwELYKSFUvVf-7FFZu1UMvVrOxHSenChAIIYEQLdLeIv8WpG12u9m98wh9xj5JZxwnAlG47K40o2TjGY9n7Mn3EfI5cBkMN4YZHxQTRhVMSxkYrLXSq-CUVvi-8-lZcXwpTqZymjbc2tRW2cfEGKjd3OIe-VdI00ueIa_Ot8VvhqxReLqaKDQ2yBZCl2HxpaZDwcULUXWktkKxKuN5QhbCTh4kFIPiAMlkbq9H95LM-72St3PYuAgdvSDPU_ZI9zpzvyRPfPOKPD1N5-OvySrBfM7ouvV0Huiv2CvpaSKH-Pn35g-uW44iEzG-kNxS7OCI6J4U8lfquta765bqxtF2DZEEfJEulngPNCJe1cwwXi2pRZdZviGXR4c_Do5Z4lVgFrIlxSZuooMsDcxFlfnCCvguXah45SC_4IU2MNK8LEFUylILnRlZBQTHcornoPeWbDbzxr8n1FpjRG4zHSovlHdlZifBc6eLULhJWYzIl350a5tAx5H7Ylb3xQcYoo6GGJFPg-qiQ9r4n9JOb6I6Tba2hhpXSYWV6wPi3nNG5OMghlmERyO68fM16iBXqYBqcUTedQYf_gTnFcSpHCTqjisMCojQfVfSXF9FpG4ovznkUzAK0Wkefq76YO97_LH9-BN8IM9ybKqJ_cI7ZHO1XPtdyIpWZkw2cnE-jhNgTLb2D8_OL8ZxhwE_L_J_W_ES8A |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqIgEXRHkulGIQSFwssnEcOweEqkK1pd1eaKW9BT-h0pJdNruqeuMn8Ev4UfwSZpyHWpVy62kjjZVsPON5xJ_nI-RV4CIYbgwzPkiWGZkzLURgEGuFl8FJLfG88_gwHx1nnyZiskZ-d2dhEFbZ-cToqN3M4jfyt5CmK54gr877-Q-GrFG4u9pRaDRmse_PTqFkq9_tfQD9vk7T3Y9HOyPWsgowC7mCZEM31EEoA5YoE5_bDH6VCwUvHERXnmsDz-FKgUgJpTOdGFEEbA3lJE8DNl8Cl38DAm-CEEI56Qs8nmdFQ6KbSVYkPG07GSFyCAnMoBhB8prz8e9SUnsZm3k-Z45Bb_cuudNmq3S7Ma8Nsuare-TmuN2Pv0-WbVvRKV3Vns4C_R6xmZ62ZBRf__z8hXHSUWQ-xgPQNUXESOwmSiFfpq6B-p3UVFeO1ivwXGD7dL7AZ6DR4F3NFP3jglo00cUDcnwtM_6QrFezyj8m1FpjstQmOhQ-k96pxA6D507nIXdDlQ_Im252S9s2OUeujWnZFTugiDIqYkBe9kPnTWePfw3a7FRUtou7LqGmlkJipXyFuLPUAXnRi2HV4laMrvxshWOQGzWD6nRAHjUK7_8E5wX4xRQk8oIp9AOwI_hFSXXyLXYGh3KfQ_4GsxCN5ur3Kne2P8eLJ_9_g-fk1uhofFAe7B3uPyW3UwT0RKzyJllfLlb-GWRkS7MVlwElX6573f0FXnZJRg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ba9RAFB5KC8UXsV5Xqx1FwZeh2cxMJnkQKW2X1toiaGHf4lxrYc2um13EN3-Cv8ef4y_xnMmFllrf-pTAGZLMnHvmzPkIeRm4DIYbw4wPigmjMqalDAx8rfQqOKUVnnc-PskOTsW7sRyvkN_dWRgsq-xsYjTUbmrxH_k2hOk5TxBXZzu0ZREf9kZvZ98YIkjhTmsHp9GIyJH_8R3St_rN4R7w-lWajvY_7R6wFmGAWYgbFBu6oQ4yNyCVKvGZFXDNXSh44cDT8kwbeCfPcyDlMtdCJ0YWAdtEOcXTgI2YwPyvKQ5uE3RJjftkj2eiaAB1hWJFwtO2qxFWESGYGSQmCGRz0RdeCXCv1mlejJ-jAxzdIbfbyJXuNKK2QVZ8dZesH7d78_fIom0xOqHL2tNpoF9jnaanLTDF2Z-fv9BnOoooyHgYuqZYPRI7i1KInalryv7Oa6orR-slWDHQAzqb4ztQgPCpZoK2ck4tiuv8Pjm9kRV_QFaraeUfEWqtMSK1iQ6FF8q7PLHD4LnTWcjcMM8G5HW3uqVtG54j7sak7BIfYEQZGTEgL_qhs6bLx78GbXYsKltFr0vIr5VUmDVfQ-6kdkCe92TQYNyW0ZWfLnEM4qQKyFQH5GHD8P4jOC_ARqZAUZdEoR-A3cEvU6rzL7FLOKT-HGI5WIUoNNfPq9zd-RhvHv9_BltkHTSufH94cvSE3EqxtieWLW-S1cV86Z9CcLYwz6IWUPL5ptXuL6d-TXw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+use+of+machine+learning%E2%80%90based+pathomics+signature+for+diagnosis+and+survival+prediction+of+bladder+cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer+science&rft.au=Chen%2C+Siteng&rft.au=Jiang%2C+Liren&rft.au=Zheng%2C+Xinyi&rft.au=Shao%2C+Jialiang&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+%26+Sons%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1347-9032&rft.eissn=1349-7006&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2905&rft.epage=2914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fcas.14927&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1347-9032&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1347-9032&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1347-9032&client=summon |