Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Evidence for the relationship between maternal and perinatal factors and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is conflicting. We aimed to systematically analyze published data on maternal and fetal factors for successful VBAC. A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and the...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC pregnancy and childbirth Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 360 - 12 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central
17.10.2019
BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Evidence for the relationship between maternal and perinatal factors and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is conflicting. We aimed to systematically analyze published data on maternal and fetal factors for successful VBAC.
A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, from each database's inception to March 16, 2018. Observational studies, identifying women with a trial of labor after one previous low-transverse cesarean section were included. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
We included 94 eligible observational studies (239,006 pregnant women with 163,502 VBAC). Factors were associated with successful VBAC with the following odds ratios (OR;95%CI): age (0.92;0.86-0.98), obesity (0.50;0.39-0.64), diabetes (0.50;0.42-0.60), hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy (HDCP) (0.54;0.44-0.67), Bishop score (3.77;2.17-6.53), labor induction (0.58;0.50-0.67), macrosomia (0.56;0.50-0.64), white race (1.39;1.26-1.54), previous vaginal birth before cesarean section (3.14;2.62-3.77), previous VBAC (4.71;4.33-5.12), the indications for the previous cesarean section (cephalopelvic disproportion (0.54;0.36-0.80), dystocia or failure to progress (0.54;0.41-0.70), failed induction (0.56;0.37-0.85), and fetal malpresentation (1.66;1.38-2.01)). Adjusted ORs were similar.
Diabetes, HDCP, Bishop score, labor induction, macrosomia, age, obesity, previous vaginal birth, and the indications for the previous CS should be considered as the factors affecting the success of VBAC. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Evidence for the relationship between maternal and perinatal factors and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is conflicting. We aimed to systematically analyze published data on maternal and fetal factors for successful VBAC.BACKGROUNDEvidence for the relationship between maternal and perinatal factors and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is conflicting. We aimed to systematically analyze published data on maternal and fetal factors for successful VBAC.A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, from each database's inception to March 16, 2018. Observational studies, identifying women with a trial of labor after one previous low-transverse cesarean section were included. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.METHODSA comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, from each database's inception to March 16, 2018. Observational studies, identifying women with a trial of labor after one previous low-transverse cesarean section were included. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.We included 94 eligible observational studies (239,006 pregnant women with 163,502 VBAC). Factors were associated with successful VBAC with the following odds ratios (OR;95%CI): age (0.92;0.86-0.98), obesity (0.50;0.39-0.64), diabetes (0.50;0.42-0.60), hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy (HDCP) (0.54;0.44-0.67), Bishop score (3.77;2.17-6.53), labor induction (0.58;0.50-0.67), macrosomia (0.56;0.50-0.64), white race (1.39;1.26-1.54), previous vaginal birth before cesarean section (3.14;2.62-3.77), previous VBAC (4.71;4.33-5.12), the indications for the previous cesarean section (cephalopelvic disproportion (0.54;0.36-0.80), dystocia or failure to progress (0.54;0.41-0.70), failed induction (0.56;0.37-0.85), and fetal malpresentation (1.66;1.38-2.01)). Adjusted ORs were similar.RESULTSWe included 94 eligible observational studies (239,006 pregnant women with 163,502 VBAC). Factors were associated with successful VBAC with the following odds ratios (OR;95%CI): age (0.92;0.86-0.98), obesity (0.50;0.39-0.64), diabetes (0.50;0.42-0.60), hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy (HDCP) (0.54;0.44-0.67), Bishop score (3.77;2.17-6.53), labor induction (0.58;0.50-0.67), macrosomia (0.56;0.50-0.64), white race (1.39;1.26-1.54), previous vaginal birth before cesarean section (3.14;2.62-3.77), previous VBAC (4.71;4.33-5.12), the indications for the previous cesarean section (cephalopelvic disproportion (0.54;0.36-0.80), dystocia or failure to progress (0.54;0.41-0.70), failed induction (0.56;0.37-0.85), and fetal malpresentation (1.66;1.38-2.01)). Adjusted ORs were similar.Diabetes, HDCP, Bishop score, labor induction, macrosomia, age, obesity, previous vaginal birth, and the indications for the previous CS should be considered as the factors affecting the success of VBAC.CONCLUSIONSDiabetes, HDCP, Bishop score, labor induction, macrosomia, age, obesity, previous vaginal birth, and the indications for the previous CS should be considered as the factors affecting the success of VBAC. Abstract Background Evidence for the relationship between maternal and perinatal factors and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is conflicting. We aimed to systematically analyze published data on maternal and fetal factors for successful VBAC. Methods A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, from each database’s inception to March 16, 2018. Observational studies, identifying women with a trial of labor after one previous low-transverse cesarean section were included. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results We included 94 eligible observational studies (239,006 pregnant women with 163,502 VBAC). Factors were associated with successful VBAC with the following odds ratios (OR;95%CI): age (0.92;0.86–0.98), obesity (0.50;0.39–0.64), diabetes (0.50;0.42–0.60), hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy (HDCP) (0.54;0.44–0.67), Bishop score (3.77;2.17–6.53), labor induction (0.58;0.50–0.67), macrosomia (0.56;0.50–0.64), white race (1.39;1.26–1.54), previous vaginal birth before cesarean section (3.14;2.62–3.77), previous VBAC (4.71;4.33–5.12), the indications for the previous cesarean section (cephalopelvic disproportion (0.54;0.36–0.80), dystocia or failure to progress (0.54;0.41–0.70), failed induction (0.56;0.37–0.85), and fetal malpresentation (1.66;1.38–2.01)). Adjusted ORs were similar. Conclusions Diabetes, HDCP, Bishop score, labor induction, macrosomia, age, obesity, previous vaginal birth, and the indications for the previous CS should be considered as the factors affecting the success of VBAC. Background Evidence for the relationship between maternal and perinatal factors and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is conflicting. We aimed to systematically analyze published data on maternal and fetal factors for successful VBAC. Methods A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, from each database’s inception to March 16, 2018. Observational studies, identifying women with a trial of labor after one previous low-transverse cesarean section were included. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results We included 94 eligible observational studies (239,006 pregnant women with 163,502 VBAC). Factors were associated with successful VBAC with the following odds ratios (OR;95%CI): age (0.92;0.86–0.98), obesity (0.50;0.39–0.64), diabetes (0.50;0.42–0.60), hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy (HDCP) (0.54;0.44–0.67), Bishop score (3.77;2.17–6.53), labor induction (0.58;0.50–0.67), macrosomia (0.56;0.50–0.64), white race (1.39;1.26–1.54), previous vaginal birth before cesarean section (3.14;2.62–3.77), previous VBAC (4.71;4.33–5.12), the indications for the previous cesarean section (cephalopelvic disproportion (0.54;0.36–0.80), dystocia or failure to progress (0.54;0.41–0.70), failed induction (0.56;0.37–0.85), and fetal malpresentation (1.66;1.38–2.01)). Adjusted ORs were similar. Conclusions Diabetes, HDCP, Bishop score, labor induction, macrosomia, age, obesity, previous vaginal birth, and the indications for the previous CS should be considered as the factors affecting the success of VBAC. Evidence for the relationship between maternal and perinatal factors and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is conflicting. We aimed to systematically analyze published data on maternal and fetal factors for successful VBAC. A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, from each database's inception to March 16, 2018. Observational studies, identifying women with a trial of labor after one previous low-transverse cesarean section were included. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We included 94 eligible observational studies (239,006 pregnant women with 163,502 VBAC). Factors were associated with successful VBAC with the following odds ratios (OR;95%CI): age (0.92;0.86-0.98), obesity (0.50;0.39-0.64), diabetes (0.50;0.42-0.60), hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy (HDCP) (0.54;0.44-0.67), Bishop score (3.77;2.17-6.53), labor induction (0.58;0.50-0.67), macrosomia (0.56;0.50-0.64), white race (1.39;1.26-1.54), previous vaginal birth before cesarean section (3.14;2.62-3.77), previous VBAC (4.71;4.33-5.12), the indications for the previous cesarean section (cephalopelvic disproportion (0.54;0.36-0.80), dystocia or failure to progress (0.54;0.41-0.70), failed induction (0.56;0.37-0.85), and fetal malpresentation (1.66;1.38-2.01)). Adjusted ORs were similar. Diabetes, HDCP, Bishop score, labor induction, macrosomia, age, obesity, previous vaginal birth, and the indications for the previous CS should be considered as the factors affecting the success of VBAC. |
ArticleNumber | 360 |
Author | Wu, Yanxin Kataria, Yachana Ming, Wai-Kit Wang, Zilian Ellervik, Christina |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yanxin surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Yanxin – sequence: 2 givenname: Yachana surname: Kataria fullname: Kataria, Yachana – sequence: 3 givenname: Zilian orcidid: 0000-0002-1310-3346 surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Zilian – sequence: 4 givenname: Wai-Kit surname: Ming fullname: Ming, Wai-Kit – sequence: 5 givenname: Christina surname: Ellervik fullname: Ellervik, Christina |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623587$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kk1r3DAQhk1JaT7aH9BLEfTSi1vJki2ph0IJzQcEemnPYiyPNlpsayvJG_bfV5tNShLoSWLmnUcvmve0OprDjFX1ntHPjKnuS2KNUqKmTNdNy2S9e1WdMCFZ3XDNj57cj6vTlNaUMqla-qY65qxreKvkSbW5AJtDTARSCtZDxoHc-XxL0mItpuSWkWxh5WcYSe9jaYDLGAmQ0oWIMJOENvswfy21tEsZJ8jekohbj3cE5oFMmKGGQtgln95Wrx2MCd89nGfV74sfv86v6pufl9fn329q23Y01yhAM8lYA4PVHbVIQXPdqg4cFOvIBnC05w1yDaJH6HunrBC27TUoEAM_q64P3CHA2myinyDuTABv7gshrgzEYnRE41xDh15qAKEF0EYzjVwNnZPSlmdsYX07sDZLP-Fgcc4RxmfQ553Z35pV2JpOasW1LIBPD4AY_iyYspl8sjiOMGNYkmk4lUx0ZZtF-vGFdB2WWD7vXtUprlrGiurDU0f_rDwutgjkQWBjSCmiM9Zn2O-pGPSjYdTsI2QOETIlQmYfIbMrk-zF5CP8_zN_Acp3zHM |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_021_06368_1 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_024_06432_z crossref_primary_10_1111_ajo_13626 crossref_primary_10_38136_jgon_962948 crossref_primary_10_2147_RMHP_S322380 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_13334 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10439_021_02805_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogoh_2023_102647 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2022_2086795 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000022844 crossref_primary_10_9789_2175_5361_rpcfo_v13_10250 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2024_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_022_04747_3 crossref_primary_10_4103_jihs_jihs_5_24 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogoh_2023_102598 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_023_05396_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eurox_2023_100249 crossref_primary_10_61634_2782_3024_2023_9_18_30 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajo_13619 crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_15005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43032_020_00378_1 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_023_05688_1 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2023_2198062 crossref_primary_10_1108_NFS_01_2024_0032 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_021_06312_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eclinm_2022_101681 crossref_primary_10_17116_rosakush20232302195 crossref_primary_10_4236_ojog_2024_146071 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2022_103533 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_020_03410_z crossref_primary_10_17116_rosakush20242404163 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2024_104927 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_14166 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_14364 crossref_primary_10_12677_NS_2023_125108 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12196426 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_70013 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2024_1417429 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2022_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wombi_2021_12_008 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_36027_1 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_020_03075_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogoh_2024_102743 crossref_primary_10_1111_jmwh_13117 crossref_primary_10_4103_NJM_NJM_71_21 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40748_023_00169_x crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_5040461 crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_15017 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph182010931 crossref_primary_10_1080_01443615_2023_2265668 crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v8_i13_2855 crossref_primary_10_17816_PED15357_64 crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000003845 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2020_1868430 crossref_primary_10_2147_IJWH_S334269 crossref_primary_10_52711_0974_360X_2023_00554 crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v12_i25_5706 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmh_2025_100318 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11060908 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2024_2399942 crossref_primary_10_3892_etm_2021_10326 crossref_primary_10_4103_sjmms_sjmms_256_22 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_024_06650_5 crossref_primary_10_1177_17455065211061960 crossref_primary_10_31083_j_ceog_2021_03_2439 crossref_primary_10_1097_MLR_0000000000001461 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_34856_8 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2021_2008350 crossref_primary_10_1111_jmwh_13687 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_37026 crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000004202 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_021_03794_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_life13102016 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_14855 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_m3377 crossref_primary_10_61997_bjm_v14i1_448 crossref_primary_10_1093_inthealth_ihad048 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_024_06921_1 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_054540 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogn_2023_11_003 crossref_primary_10_1515_jpm_2021_0053 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2021_e08276 crossref_primary_10_1111_birt_12737 crossref_primary_10_2147_RMHP_S395388 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2024_104168 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajogmf_2023_101209 crossref_primary_10_1177_20503121221097597 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12134492 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0041_1736538 crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2020_8801 crossref_primary_10_4274_jtgga_galenos_2022_2022_1_2 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10006_2433 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12103532 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00404-017-4569-4 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1994.tb01101.x 10.1080/14767058.2016.1237498 10.1055/s-2004-835961 10.3109/14767058.2014.1002767 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.075 10.1097/01.AOG.0000223871.69852.31 10.3109/14767050902874089 10.1055/s-0036-1580609 10.12816/0047437 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1997.tb00855.x 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.007 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.051 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.356 10.1111/1471-0528.12508 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1994.tb00489.x 10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.09.002 10.1007/s40477-014-0116-3 10.1080/01443610500280317 10.1080/01443615.2017.1355896 10.1007/s00404-017-4343-7 10.1186/s12958-018-0397-z 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.026 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.109 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829f8ced 10.1080/01443619750113663 10.1067/mob.2001.115176 10.3109/00016349.2010.499448 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00372.x 10.1097/00006250-199011000-00029 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70192-9 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001973 10.3109/01443619409027624 10.1097/01.AOG.0000110544.42128.7a 10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.012 10.1055/s-2006-931916 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70393-9 10.2147/IJWH.S29626 10.1055/s-0037-1599129 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.03.029 10.1111/1471-0528.12539 10.1111/ajo.12664 10.7150/ijms.4682 10.1055/s-0031-1275386 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.066 10.1016/j.enfcli.2016.08.006 10.1002/ijgo.12164 10.5580/7c3 10.1080/14767058.2017.1306513 10.3109/14767058.2016.1149566 10.1007/s13224-014-0519-2 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.041 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.03.007 10.3109/14767058.2013.842551 10.1111/birt.12293 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2003.00086.x 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.06.019 10.1038/s41598-018-21488-6 10.1007/s13224-017-1031-2 10.1080/01443615.2017.1286465 10.1056/NEJMoa040405 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1996.tb02910.x 10.2147/IJWH.S83800 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.010 10.1038/jp.2014.196 10.1080/14767050600847809 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1998.tb00063.x 10.3109/01443615.2010.544426 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f2de49 10.1007/s13224-015-0835-1 10.3109/01443615.2010.486085 10.1097/01.AOG.0000177972.32941.65 10.3329/bjms.v15i4.21687 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.09.031 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.007 10.1002/uog.12423 10.18295/squmj.2016.16.04.007 10.1007/s00404-014-3287-4 10.1186/1471-2393-10-62 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.07.010 10.3109/14767058.2014.900750 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.12.002 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03126.x 10.2147/IJWH.S56147 10.1046/j.1365-3016.11.s1.9.x 10.1186/s12884-017-1467-5 10.1097/01.AOG.0000139516.43748.1b 10.1056/NEJM199609053351001 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.029 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020252 10.1136/bmj.303.6806.818 10.1186/1471-2393-13-31 10.3109/01443615.2013.782275 10.1080/14767058.2017.1288206 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.068 10.1097/01.AOG.0000115508.75370.23 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s). 2019 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s). 2019 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7RV 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9- K9. KB0 M0R M0S M1P NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12884-019-2517-y |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Consumer Health Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Proquest Medical Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Family Health (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Family Health ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1471-2393 |
EndPage | 12 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_ff20db79aa494a02919e38d6f77cdafc PMC6798397 31623587 10_1186_s12884_019_2517_y |
Genre | Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5GY 5VS 6J9 6PF 7RV 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AZQEC BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BKNYI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EJD ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO ICW IHR INH INR ITC K9- KQ8 M0R M1P M48 M~E N8Y NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB ~8M -A0 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7XB 8FK DWQXO K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-e4a917112adc960ce0a939586afa235e1daf0b32e39a4beabbf8c44c5b9a8a4d3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1471-2393 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:26:06 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:06:50 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 11:35:49 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 06:28:33 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:31:36 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:58:36 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:00:14 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Vaginal birth after cesarean section Trial of labor Delivery |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c560t-e4a917112adc960ce0a939586afa235e1daf0b32e39a4beabbf8c44c5b9a8a4d3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-1310-3346 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12884-019-2517-y |
PMID | 31623587 |
PQID | 2306838511 |
PQPubID | 44759 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ff20db79aa494a02919e38d6f77cdafc pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6798397 proquest_miscellaneous_2307146288 proquest_journals_2306838511 pubmed_primary_31623587 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12884_019_2517_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_019_2517_y |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-10-17 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-10-17 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2019 text: 2019-10-17 day: 17 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC pregnancy and childbirth |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Pregnancy Childbirth |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | G Juhasz (2517_CR111) 2005; 106 J Wen (2517_CR16) 2018; 8 2517_CR61 KB Eden (2517_CR11) 2010; 116 EN Schoorel (2517_CR56) 2014; 121 MB Landon (2517_CR8) 2004; 351 2517_CR102 TD Metz (2517_CR52) 2013; 122 MB Landon (2517_CR73) 2005; 193 JC Rageth (2517_CR88) 1999; 93 B Khan (2517_CR36) 2016; 28 V Oboro (2517_CR64) 2010; 89 SK Srinivas (2517_CR70) 2006; 23 AM Faucett (2517_CR109) 2016; 33 2517_CR105 MB Senturk (2517_CR40) 2015; 7 2517_CR104 S Wasti (2517_CR97) 1994; 34 A Soni (2517_CR44) 2015; 129 S Gupta (2517_CR46) 2014; 64 CM Paterson (2517_CR99) 1991; 303 SZ Wanyonyi (2517_CR63) 2010; 10 F Facchinetti (2517_CR42) 2015; 28 WH Huang (2517_CR106) 2002; 99 E Bujold (2517_CR74) 2005; 193 GC Smith (2517_CR71) 2005; 2 CA Cameron (2517_CR75) 2004; 85 N Obeidat (2517_CR57) 2013; 33 R Lovell (2517_CR95) 1996; 36 JM Dodd (2517_CR7) 2013; 12 C Gyamfi (2517_CR80) 2004; 104 JG Ouzounian (2517_CR60) 2011; 28 R Gonen (2517_CR76) 2004; 21 D Weinstein (2517_CR94) 1996; 174 P Hidalgo-Lopezosa (2517_CR107) 2017; 27 CP Durnwald (2517_CR83) 2004; 191 HE Knight (2517_CR9) 2014; 121 MM Maykin (2517_CR23) 2017; 7 J Grinstead (2517_CR81) 2004; 103 E Annessi (2517_CR33) 2016; 29 LF Damle (2517_CR49) 2015; 28 A Kalok (2517_CR26) 2018; 38 JB Haumonte (2517_CR29) 2018; 47 Orla M. McNally FRCSI (2517_CR87) 1999; 39 E Ashwal (2517_CR39) 2016; 29 MJ McMahon (2517_CR10) 1996; 335 MJ Dinsmoor (2517_CR82) 2004; 103 GO Ugwu (2517_CR47) 2014; 6 HT Tsai (2517_CR20) 2017; 56 SD Pathadey (2517_CR72) 2005; 25 BO Olusanya (2517_CR67) 2009; 107 M Foureur (2517_CR6) 2010; 37 E Nkwabong (2517_CR35) 2016; 66 ACE McDonald (2517_CR21) 2018; 58 TC De Bonrostro (2517_CR22) 2017; 295 J Abreu-Silva (2517_CR27) 2017; 37 2517_CR5 S Lurie (2517_CR113) 2014; 27 MG Rosen (2517_CR12) 1990; 76 Y Mizrachi (2517_CR19) 2018; 297 K Nakamura (2517_CR25) 2017; 44 M Madaan (2517_CR62) 2011; 31 A Palatnik (2517_CR112) 2015; 212 MD Patel (2517_CR24) 2018; 68 A Joyce (2517_CR1) 2017; 287 N Sananes (2517_CR50) 2014; 290 VL Holt (2517_CR93) 1997; 11 SA Siddiqui (2517_CR53) 2013; 33 T Yasumizu (2517_CR98) 1994; 20 O Erez (2517_CR59) 2012; 4 ES Miller (2517_CR38) 2015; 212 2517_CR28 H Ganer Herman (2517_CR30) 2017; 138 P Bellows (2517_CR4) 2017; 30 M Comas (2517_CR37) 2016; 29 YW Cheng (2517_CR3) 2011; 38 M Mirteymouri (2517_CR31) 2016; 10 N Singh (2517_CR41) 2015; 18 JB Tripathi (2517_CR77) 2006; 104 JY Kwon (2517_CR66) 2009; 22 N Shaheen (2517_CR48) 2014; 64 B Olagbuji (2517_CR65) 2010; 30 O Naji (2517_CR55) 2013; 41 H Obara (2517_CR90) 1998; 24 E Bujold (2517_CR79) 2004; 191 R Kalisa (2517_CR18) 2017; 17 R Beloosesky (2517_CR14) 2018; 31 D Marchiano (2517_CR78) 2004; 190 JU Hibbard (2517_CR110) 2006; 108 AL Hollard (2517_CR68) 2006; 19 AO Ilesanmi (2517_CR91) 1997; 17 M Thomas (2517_CR96) 2009; 14 A Yokoi (2517_CR58) 2012; 9 2517_CR84 Kin Sun Wong (2517_CR85) 2003; 29 World Health Organization Human Reproduction Programme A (2517_CR2) 2015; 23 M Black (2517_CR32) 2016; 13 L Balachandran (2517_CR45) 2014; 8 AB Caughey (2517_CR89) 1998; 179 Y Wu (2517_CR108) 2018; 16 Bulletins-Obstetrics (2517_CR13) 2017; 130 H Gonsalves (2517_CR34) 2016; 16 M Jerbi (2517_CR69) 2006; 94 A Bhide (2517_CR100) 2016; 133 2517_CR15 F Perveen (2517_CR92) 1997; 23 M Birara (2517_CR54) 2013; 13 H Tasleem (2517_CR101) 2016; 15 J Regan (2517_CR43) 2015; 35 SA Faiz (2517_CR103) 2017; 42 E Krispin (2517_CR17) 2018; 31 N Melamed (2517_CR51) 2013; 209 TL Coleman (2517_CR86) 2001; 184 |
References_xml | – volume: 297 start-page: 85 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 2517_CR19 publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4569-4 – volume: 34 start-page: 527 issue: 5 year: 1994 ident: 2517_CR97 publication-title: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1994.tb01101.x – volume: 30 start-page: 2092 issue: 17 year: 2017 ident: 2517_CR4 publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1237498 – volume: 21 start-page: 447 issue: 8 year: 2004 ident: 2517_CR76 publication-title: Am J Perinatol doi: 10.1055/s-2004-835961 – volume: 29 start-page: 435 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 2517_CR33 publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.1002767 – ident: 2517_CR61 – volume: 191 start-page: 1644 issue: 5 year: 2004 ident: 2517_CR79 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.075 – volume: 108 start-page: 125 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 2517_CR110 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000223871.69852.31 – volume: 22 start-page: 1057 issue: 11 year: 2009 ident: 2517_CR66 publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767050902874089 – volume: 12 year: 2013 ident: 2517_CR7 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 33 start-page: 991 issue: 10 year: 2016 ident: 2517_CR109 publication-title: Am J Perinatol doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580609 – ident: 2517_CR28 doi: 10.12816/0047437 – ident: 2517_CR102 – volume: 23 start-page: 341 issue: 4 year: 1997 ident: 2517_CR92 publication-title: J obstet Gynaecol Res doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1997.tb00855.x – volume: 10 start-page: 206 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 2517_CR31 publication-title: J Family Reprod Health – volume: 23 start-page: 149 issue: 45 year: 2015 ident: 2517_CR2 publication-title: Reprod Health Matters doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.007 – volume: 8 start-page: 99 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 2517_CR45 publication-title: J Clin Diagn Res – volume: 191 start-page: 954 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 2517_CR83 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.051 – volume: 33 start-page: 356 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 2517_CR53 publication-title: Ann Saudi Med doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.356 – volume: 121 start-page: 183 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 2517_CR9 publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12508 – volume: 20 start-page: 407 issue: 4 year: 1994 ident: 2517_CR98 publication-title: Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1994.tb00489.x – volume: 85 start-page: 267 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 2517_CR75 publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.09.002 – volume: 18 start-page: 173 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 2517_CR41 publication-title: J Ultrasound doi: 10.1007/s40477-014-0116-3 – volume: 25 start-page: 662 issue: 7 year: 2005 ident: 2517_CR72 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1080/01443610500280317 – volume: 64 start-page: 542 issue: 5 year: 2014 ident: 2517_CR48 publication-title: J Pak Med Assoc – volume: 38 start-page: 339 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 2517_CR26 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1355896 – volume: 295 start-page: 1135 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 2517_CR22 publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4343-7 – volume: 16 start-page: 77 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 2517_CR108 publication-title: Reprod Biology Endocrinol doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0397-z – volume: 212 start-page: 358.e351 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 2517_CR112 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.026 – ident: 2517_CR15 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.109 – volume: 122 start-page: 571 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 2517_CR52 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829f8ced – volume: 17 start-page: 139 issue: 2 year: 1997 ident: 2517_CR91 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1080/01443619750113663 – volume: 184 start-page: 1104 issue: 6 year: 2001 ident: 2517_CR86 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.115176 – volume: 89 start-page: 1229 issue: 9 year: 2010 ident: 2517_CR64 publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.499448 – volume: 37 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 2517_CR6 publication-title: Birth doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00372.x – volume: 76 start-page: 865 issue: 5 Pt 1 year: 1990 ident: 2517_CR12 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/00006250-199011000-00029 – volume: 179 start-page: 938 issue: 4 year: 1998 ident: 2517_CR89 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70192-9 – volume: 13 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 2517_CR32 publication-title: PLoS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001973 – volume: 14 start-page: 416 issue: 6 year: 2009 ident: 2517_CR96 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.3109/01443619409027624 – volume: 103 start-page: 282 issue: 2 year: 2004 ident: 2517_CR82 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000110544.42128.7a – ident: 2517_CR84 – ident: 2517_CR104 – volume: 38 start-page: 297 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 2517_CR3 publication-title: Clin Perinatol doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.012 – volume: 23 start-page: 145 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: 2517_CR70 publication-title: Am J Perinatol doi: 10.1055/s-2006-931916 – volume: 174 start-page: 192 issue: 1 Pt 1 year: 1996 ident: 2517_CR94 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70393-9 – volume: 4 start-page: 93 year: 2012 ident: 2517_CR59 publication-title: Int J Women's Health doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S29626 – volume: 7 start-page: e31 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 2517_CR23 publication-title: AJP Rep doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599129 – volume: 94 start-page: 43 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 2517_CR69 publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.03.029 – volume: 121 start-page: 194 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 2517_CR56 publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12539 – volume: 58 start-page: 64 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 2517_CR21 publication-title: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/ajo.12664 – volume: 9 start-page: 488 issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: 2517_CR58 publication-title: Int J Med Sci doi: 10.7150/ijms.4682 – volume: 28 start-page: 593 issue: 8 year: 2011 ident: 2517_CR60 publication-title: Am J Perinatol doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275386 – volume: 104 start-page: 113 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: 2517_CR77 publication-title: J Indian Med Assoc – volume: 193 start-page: 1016 issue: 3 Pt 2 year: 2005 ident: 2517_CR73 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.066 – volume: 27 start-page: 28 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 2517_CR107 publication-title: Enfermeria Clinica doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2016.08.006 – volume: 130 start-page: e217 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 2517_CR13 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 138 start-page: 84 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 2517_CR30 publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12164 – volume: 42 start-page: 231 year: 2017 ident: 2517_CR103 publication-title: Rawal Med J – ident: 2517_CR105 doi: 10.5580/7c3 – volume: 31 start-page: 1066 issue: 8 year: 2018 ident: 2517_CR17 publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1306513 – volume: 93 start-page: 332 issue: 3 year: 1999 ident: 2517_CR88 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 29 start-page: 3870 issue: 23 year: 2016 ident: 2517_CR37 publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1149566 – ident: 2517_CR5 – volume: 64 start-page: 260 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 2517_CR46 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol India doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0519-2 – volume: 99 start-page: 41 issue: 1 year: 2002 ident: 2517_CR106 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 193 start-page: 1517 issue: 4 year: 2005 ident: 2517_CR74 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.041 – volume: 56 start-page: 41 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 2517_CR20 publication-title: Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.03.007 – volume: 27 start-page: 812 issue: 8 year: 2014 ident: 2517_CR113 publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.842551 – volume: 44 start-page: 363 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 2517_CR25 publication-title: Birth doi: 10.1111/birt.12293 – volume: 29 start-page: 2665 issue: 16 year: 2016 ident: 2517_CR39 publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med – volume: 28 start-page: 587 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 2517_CR36 publication-title: J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad – volume: 29 start-page: 104 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 2517_CR85 publication-title: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research doi: 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2003.00086.x – volume: 107 start-page: 135 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 2517_CR67 publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.06.019 – volume: 8 start-page: 3084 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 2517_CR16 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21488-6 – volume: 68 start-page: 276 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 2517_CR24 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol India doi: 10.1007/s13224-017-1031-2 – volume: 37 start-page: 704 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: 2517_CR27 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1286465 – volume: 351 start-page: 2581 issue: 25 year: 2004 ident: 2517_CR8 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040405 – volume: 36 start-page: 4 issue: 1 year: 1996 ident: 2517_CR95 publication-title: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1996.tb02910.x – volume: 7 start-page: 693 year: 2015 ident: 2517_CR40 publication-title: Int J Women's Health doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S83800 – volume: 209 start-page: 49.e41 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 2517_CR51 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.010 – volume: 35 start-page: 252 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 2517_CR43 publication-title: J Perinatol doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.196 – volume: 19 start-page: 483 issue: 8 year: 2006 ident: 2517_CR68 publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.1080/14767050600847809 – volume: 24 start-page: 129 issue: 2 year: 1998 ident: 2517_CR90 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol Res doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1998.tb00063.x – volume: 31 start-page: 224 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 2517_CR62 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.3109/01443615.2010.544426 – volume: 116 start-page: 967 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 2517_CR11 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f2de49 – volume: 66 start-page: 202 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2016 ident: 2517_CR35 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol India doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0835-1 – volume: 30 start-page: 582 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 2517_CR65 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.3109/01443615.2010.486085 – volume: 106 start-page: 741 issue: 4 year: 2005 ident: 2517_CR111 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000177972.32941.65 – volume: 15 start-page: 546 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 2517_CR101 publication-title: Bangladesh J Med Sci doi: 10.3329/bjms.v15i4.21687 – volume: 133 start-page: 297 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 2517_CR100 publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.09.031 – volume: 129 start-page: 156 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 2517_CR44 publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.007 – volume: 41 start-page: 672 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: 2517_CR55 publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.12423 – volume: 16 start-page: e445 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 2517_CR34 publication-title: Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J doi: 10.18295/squmj.2016.16.04.007 – volume: 290 start-page: 669 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 2517_CR50 publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3287-4 – volume: 10 start-page: 62 year: 2010 ident: 2517_CR63 publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-62 – volume: 28 start-page: 219 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 2517_CR49 publication-title: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.07.010 – volume: 28 start-page: 55 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 2517_CR42 publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.900750 – volume: 47 start-page: 127 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 2517_CR29 publication-title: J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.12.002 – volume: 39 start-page: 425 issue: 4 year: 1999 ident: 2517_CR87 publication-title: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03126.x – volume: 6 start-page: 301 year: 2014 ident: 2517_CR47 publication-title: Int J Women's Health doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S56147 – volume: 11 start-page: 63 issue: Suppl 1 year: 1997 ident: 2517_CR93 publication-title: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.11.s1.9.x – volume: 17 start-page: 272 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 2517_CR18 publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1467-5 – volume: 104 start-page: 715 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: 2517_CR80 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000139516.43748.1b – volume: 335 start-page: 689 issue: 10 year: 1996 ident: 2517_CR10 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609053351001 – volume: 212 start-page: 791.e791 issue: 6 year: 2015 ident: 2517_CR38 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.029 – volume: 2 issue: 9 year: 2005 ident: 2517_CR71 publication-title: PLoS Med doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020252 – volume: 303 start-page: 818 issue: 6806 year: 1991 ident: 2517_CR99 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6806.818 – volume: 13 start-page: 31 year: 2013 ident: 2517_CR54 publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-31 – volume: 33 start-page: 474 issue: 5 year: 2013 ident: 2517_CR57 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.782275 – volume: 287 start-page: 1 year: 2017 ident: 2517_CR1 publication-title: NCHS Data Brief – volume: 31 start-page: 464 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 2517_CR14 publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1288206 – volume: 190 start-page: 790 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 2517_CR78 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.068 – volume: 103 start-page: 534 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 2517_CR81 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000115508.75370.23 |
SSID | ssj0017850 |
Score | 2.5470726 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Evidence for the relationship between maternal and perinatal factors and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is conflicting. We aimed to... Background Evidence for the relationship between maternal and perinatal factors and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is conflicting.... Abstract Background Evidence for the relationship between maternal and perinatal factors and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 360 |
SubjectTerms | Birth Weight Body Mass Index Cesarean section Childbirth & labor Delivery Evidence-based medicine Female Gestational Age Health risk assessment Humans Induced labor Infant, Newborn Maternal Age Meta-analysis Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Prenatal Care - methods Systematic review Trial of labor Vaginal Birth after Cesarean - methods Vaginal birth after cesarean section Womens health |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NaxUxEA_Sg3gRv91aJYInIXR3k90kvVXxUYR6stBbmHxhoW5L33tC_3tnsnnPPhG9eM1kITszycxkJr9h7J0MUeuolQg9Xd3kPgmLhlPIMaGxHRLGb5TRPf0ynpypz-fD-Z1WX1QTNsMDz4w7zLlvo9cWQFkFbW87m6SJY9Y6RMiBTl-0eZtgquYPtBk2OczOjIdLPIUNVVtYQRBd4nbHChWw_j95mL8XSt6xPItH7GF1GfnxvNTH7F6anrD7pzUp_pRdL-aeORwqq1PkdL3Kl-vSDTGvL_kPKO2vuL-4QUJpDM6BIxXQaZz4shRkTUc49gvamc_PWjhMkX9PKxBQAUyesbPFp68fT0RtpCACOjQrkRRgVIaeFcSAEUtILVhpBzNCBhJIh4xsveyTtKB8Au-zCUqFwVswoKJ8zvamqym9ZLz3wWrqC9NJpVIrvYp-8G0fRp9RSL5h7YaxLlSUcWp2celKtGFGN8vCoSwcycLdNuz99pPrGWLjb5M_kLS2EwkduwygzriqM-5fOtOwg42sXd2yS0exmJHkgDbs7ZaMm40yKDClq3WZozt6zWsa9mJWje1KZEfKbXTD9I7S7Cx1lzJdfCuA3pQJQ79w_3_82yv2oCc9p6IbfcD2Vjfr9Br9ppV_U7bIT9sJGbI priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Na9wwEBVtCqWX0u86SYsKPRVEbEu2pFxKUrqEQnpqYG9i9OE2kHi3691C_n00stbplpKrJYPsGUlvNKP3CPnInZfSS8FcjUc3XR2Yjhsn422Im20TYvyGGd3z7-3Zhfg2b-b5wG3IZZXbNTEt1H7h8Iz8CKGy4ogPPi9_M1SNwuxqltB4SB4hdRl6tZxPARcKz28zmZVqj4a4FiusudAMibrYzc5elCj7_4cz_y2X_Gv_mT0jTzNwpCejpZ-TB6F_QR6f59T4S7Kcjco5FPIPD57iISsdNkkTsdtc0T-QRLCovVzFhiQPToHGVojQsadDKsvqj-OzO4JnOl5uodB7eh3WwCDTmLwiF7OvP76csSynwFyENWsWBMTYLOIr8C7GLS6UoLluVAsdoFkqD11peR24BmEDWNspJ4RrrAYFwvPXZK9f9OEtobV1WqI6TMWFCCW3wtvGlrVrbSc12IKU2x9rXOYaR8mLK5NiDtWa0RYm2sKgLcxNQT5NryxHoo37Op-itaaOyJGdHixWP02ecqbr6tLbOBwQWkBZ60oHrnzbSenip7qCHG5tbfLEHcydmxXkw9QcpxzmUaAPi03qIyu806sK8mZ0jWkkvEIXV7Igcsdpdoa629Jf_kq03pgPi-hw__5hHZAnNXowFtXIQ7K3Xm3Cu4iL1vZ9cv5b4K8P4A priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623587 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2306838511 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2307146288 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6798397 https://doaj.org/article/ff20db79aa494a02919e38d6f77cdafc |
Volume | 19 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9swED_6AaUvY99z1wUN9jTw5liyJQ3GWEZDGaSMskDYiznJ8lbInC4fZfnvp5PttBnZXvygDyPr7nx3utP9AF5xW0pZShHblI5uqtTF2ivOmOfOK9vMef-NIrqji_x8LD5PsskedPBW7QYudrp2hCc1nk_f_P61_uAF_n0QeJW_Xfh_rKJcCh1TAa54vQ-HXjFJAjQYidugglRZF9jcOe0YjnifVkj5dXe0VCjmv8sC_TuR8o5mGt6He61JyT42PPAA9lz9EI5GbdD8EVwPG0wdhi0pXMno-JUtVgEtsVpN2Q0GeCxmrua-IwCHM2S-F71RWbNFSNiq3_m229LPrLn2wrAu2U-3xBjbAiePYTw8-_rpPG6BFmLrDZ5l7AR6r81bXlha79FYl6DmOlM5VkgE65dYJYanjmsUxqExlbJC2MxoVChK_gQO6lntngFLjdWScGP6XAiXcCNKk5kktbmppEYTQdJtbGHbKuQEhjEtgjei8qIhS-HJUhBZinUErzdTrpsSHP8bPCBqbQZS9ezQMJt_L1phLKoqTUrjl4NCC0xS3deOqzKvpLT-U20Epx2ti44jC_LVFCcDNYKXm24vjBRhwdrNVmGM7NNtXxXB04Y1NivpWCsCucU0W0vd7qmvfoSC3xQp83bjyT_f-RyOU-JjyrSRp3CwnK_cC28sLU0P9uVE9uBwcHbx5bIXjhx6QSz883Lw7Q_f4heK |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKkYAL4k2ggJHgghQ1ib1xjIQQr9WWdntqpd7M-BGoVLLLPkD7p_iNzDjJlkWot15jJ5p4ZjwznvF8jL0QzivllUxdQUc3dRFSjYYzFWVAYzsIGL9RRnd8WI6O5eeTwckW-93fhaGyyn5PjBu1nzg6I98lV7kS5B-8nf5ICTWKsqs9hEYrFvth9QtDtvmbvY_I35dFMfx09GGUdqgCqUPrvkiDBAxR0M0A79B9dyEDLfSgKqEGoi73UGdWFEFokDaAtXXlpHQDq6EC6QV-9wq7ioY3o2BPnawDPAK67zOneVXuznHvr6jGQ6fUGCxdbdi-CBHwP7_23_LMv-zd8Ba72Tmq_F0rWbfZVmjusGvjLhV_l02HLVIPh47BwXM61OXzZcRgrJdn_CdE0C1uT2c4EOHIOXAcBXRVGz6PZWDNa3x23lCat5dpODSefw8LSKFrm3KPHV_KQt9n282kCQ8ZL6zTitBociFlyISV3g5sVrjS1kqDTVjWL6xxXW9zgtg4MzHGqUrT8sIgLwzxwqwS9mr9yrRt7HHR5PfErfVE6skdH0xmX02n4qaui8xbJAeklpAVOtdBVL6slXL4qy5hOz2vTbdRzM25WCfs-XoYVZzyNtCEyTLOUTndIa4S9qAVjTUlIieVqlTC1IbQbJC6OdKcfottxCn_ht7oo4vJesauj47GB-Zg73D_MbtRkDRTQY_aYduL2TI8QZ9sYZ9GReDsy2Vr3h9m1E6V |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors+associated+with+successful+vaginal+birth+after+a+cesarean+section%3A+a+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=BMC+pregnancy+and+childbirth&rft.au=Wu%2C+Yanxin&rft.au=Kataria%2C+Yachana&rft.au=Wang%2C+Zilian&rft.au=Ming%2C+Wai-Kit&rft.date=2019-10-17&rft.eissn=1471-2393&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12884-019-2517-y&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31623587&rft.externalDocID=31623587 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2393&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2393&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2393&client=summon |