Using appropriate pre-pregnancy body mass index cut points for obesity in the Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study

Appropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which pre-pregnancy BMI cut-offs of obesity, either BMI ≥ 25 kg/m as recommended by the WHO for Asians or BMI ≥ 28 kg/m as suggested by the Working Group on Obesity in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inReproductive biology and endocrinology Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 77 - 7
Main Authors Wu, Yanxin, Ming, Wai-Kit, Wang, Dongyu, Chen, Haitian, Li, Zhuyu, Wang, Zilian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 10.08.2018
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Appropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which pre-pregnancy BMI cut-offs of obesity, either BMI ≥ 25 kg/m as recommended by the WHO for Asians or BMI ≥ 28 kg/m as suggested by the Working Group on Obesity in China (WGOC), best predicts the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed 11,494 medical records for live singleton deliveries in a tertiary center in Guangzhou, China, between January 2013 and December 2016. The primary outcomes included maternal obesity prevalence, adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, logistic regression, and diagnostics tests. Among the study population, 824 (7.2%) were obese according to the WHO criteria for Asian populations, and this would be reduced to 198 (1.7%) based on the criteria of WGOC. Obesity-related adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, cesarean section, and large for gestational age (P < 0.05). Compared to the WGOC criterion, the WHO for Asians criterion had a higher Youden index in our assessment of its predictive value in identifying risk of obesity-related adverse outcomes for Chinese pregnant women. Women in the BMI range of 25 to 28 kg/m are at high risks for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, which were similar to women with BMI ≥ 28 kg/m . A lower pre-pregnancy BMI cutoff at 25 kg/m for defining obesity may be appropriate for pregnant women in South China. If WGOC standards are applied to pregnant Chinese populations, a significant proportion of at-risk patients may be missed.
AbstractList BackgroundAppropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which pre-pregnancy BMI cut-offs of obesity, either BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 as recommended by the WHO for Asians or BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 as suggested by the Working Group on Obesity in China (WGOC), best predicts the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 11,494 medical records for live singleton deliveries in a tertiary center in Guangzhou, China, between January 2013 and December 2016. The primary outcomes included maternal obesity prevalence, adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, logistic regression, and diagnostics tests.ResultsAmong the study population, 824 (7.2%) were obese according to the WHO criteria for Asian populations, and this would be reduced to 198 (1.7%) based on the criteria of WGOC. Obesity-related adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, cesarean section, and large for gestational age (P < 0.05). Compared to the WGOC criterion, the WHO for Asians criterion had a higher Youden index in our assessment of its predictive value in identifying risk of obesity-related adverse outcomes for Chinese pregnant women. Women in the BMI range of 25 to 28 kg/m2 are at high risks for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, which were similar to women with BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2.ConclusionsA lower pre-pregnancy BMI cutoff at 25 kg/m2 for defining obesity may be appropriate for pregnant women in South China. If WGOC standards are applied to pregnant Chinese populations, a significant proportion of at-risk patients may be missed.
Appropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which pre-pregnancy BMI cut-offs of obesity, either BMI ≥ 25 kg/m as recommended by the WHO for Asians or BMI ≥ 28 kg/m as suggested by the Working Group on Obesity in China (WGOC), best predicts the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed 11,494 medical records for live singleton deliveries in a tertiary center in Guangzhou, China, between January 2013 and December 2016. The primary outcomes included maternal obesity prevalence, adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, logistic regression, and diagnostics tests. Among the study population, 824 (7.2%) were obese according to the WHO criteria for Asian populations, and this would be reduced to 198 (1.7%) based on the criteria of WGOC. Obesity-related adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, cesarean section, and large for gestational age (P < 0.05). Compared to the WGOC criterion, the WHO for Asians criterion had a higher Youden index in our assessment of its predictive value in identifying risk of obesity-related adverse outcomes for Chinese pregnant women. Women in the BMI range of 25 to 28 kg/m are at high risks for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, which were similar to women with BMI ≥ 28 kg/m . A lower pre-pregnancy BMI cutoff at 25 kg/m for defining obesity may be appropriate for pregnant women in South China. If WGOC standards are applied to pregnant Chinese populations, a significant proportion of at-risk patients may be missed.
Background Appropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which pre-pregnancy BMI cut-offs of obesity, either BMI [greater than or equai to] 25 kg/m.sup.2 as recommended by the WHO for Asians or BMI [greater than or equai to] 28 kg/m.sup.2 as suggested by the Working Group on Obesity in China (WGOC), best predicts the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 11,494 medical records for live singleton deliveries in a tertiary center in Guangzhou, China, between January 2013 and December 2016. The primary outcomes included maternal obesity prevalence, adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, logistic regression, and diagnostics tests. Results Among the study population, 824 (7.2%) were obese according to the WHO criteria for Asian populations, and this would be reduced to 198 (1.7%) based on the criteria of WGOC. Obesity-related adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, cesarean section, and large for gestational age (P < 0.05). Compared to the WGOC criterion, the WHO for Asians criterion had a higher Youden index in our assessment of its predictive value in identifying risk of obesity-related adverse outcomes for Chinese pregnant women. Women in the BMI range of 25 to 28 kg/m.sup.2 are at high risks for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, which were similar to women with BMI [greater than or equai to] 28 kg/m.sup.2. Conclusions A lower pre-pregnancy BMI cutoff at 25 kg/m.sup.2 for defining obesity may be appropriate for pregnant women in South China. If WGOC standards are applied to pregnant Chinese populations, a significant proportion of at-risk patients may be missed. Keywords: Obesity, Pregnancy, Body mass index, Outcome
Appropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which pre-pregnancy BMI cut-offs of obesity, either BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 as recommended by the WHO for Asians or BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 as suggested by the Working Group on Obesity in China (WGOC), best predicts the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.BACKGROUNDAppropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which pre-pregnancy BMI cut-offs of obesity, either BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 as recommended by the WHO for Asians or BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 as suggested by the Working Group on Obesity in China (WGOC), best predicts the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.We retrospectively reviewed 11,494 medical records for live singleton deliveries in a tertiary center in Guangzhou, China, between January 2013 and December 2016. The primary outcomes included maternal obesity prevalence, adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, logistic regression, and diagnostics tests.METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed 11,494 medical records for live singleton deliveries in a tertiary center in Guangzhou, China, between January 2013 and December 2016. The primary outcomes included maternal obesity prevalence, adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, logistic regression, and diagnostics tests.Among the study population, 824 (7.2%) were obese according to the WHO criteria for Asian populations, and this would be reduced to 198 (1.7%) based on the criteria of WGOC. Obesity-related adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, cesarean section, and large for gestational age (P < 0.05). Compared to the WGOC criterion, the WHO for Asians criterion had a higher Youden index in our assessment of its predictive value in identifying risk of obesity-related adverse outcomes for Chinese pregnant women. Women in the BMI range of 25 to 28 kg/m2 are at high risks for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, which were similar to women with BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2.RESULTSAmong the study population, 824 (7.2%) were obese according to the WHO criteria for Asian populations, and this would be reduced to 198 (1.7%) based on the criteria of WGOC. Obesity-related adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, cesarean section, and large for gestational age (P < 0.05). Compared to the WGOC criterion, the WHO for Asians criterion had a higher Youden index in our assessment of its predictive value in identifying risk of obesity-related adverse outcomes for Chinese pregnant women. Women in the BMI range of 25 to 28 kg/m2 are at high risks for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, which were similar to women with BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2.A lower pre-pregnancy BMI cutoff at 25 kg/m2 for defining obesity may be appropriate for pregnant women in South China. If WGOC standards are applied to pregnant Chinese populations, a significant proportion of at-risk patients may be missed.CONCLUSIONSA lower pre-pregnancy BMI cutoff at 25 kg/m2 for defining obesity may be appropriate for pregnant women in South China. If WGOC standards are applied to pregnant Chinese populations, a significant proportion of at-risk patients may be missed.
Abstract Background Appropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which pre-pregnancy BMI cut-offs of obesity, either BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 as recommended by the WHO for Asians or BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 as suggested by the Working Group on Obesity in China (WGOC), best predicts the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 11,494 medical records for live singleton deliveries in a tertiary center in Guangzhou, China, between January 2013 and December 2016. The primary outcomes included maternal obesity prevalence, adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, logistic regression, and diagnostics tests. Results Among the study population, 824 (7.2%) were obese according to the WHO criteria for Asian populations, and this would be reduced to 198 (1.7%) based on the criteria of WGOC. Obesity-related adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, cesarean section, and large for gestational age (P < 0.05). Compared to the WGOC criterion, the WHO for Asians criterion had a higher Youden index in our assessment of its predictive value in identifying risk of obesity-related adverse outcomes for Chinese pregnant women. Women in the BMI range of 25 to 28 kg/m2 are at high risks for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, which were similar to women with BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2. Conclusions A lower pre-pregnancy BMI cutoff at 25 kg/m2 for defining obesity may be appropriate for pregnant women in South China. If WGOC standards are applied to pregnant Chinese populations, a significant proportion of at-risk patients may be missed.
Appropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which pre-pregnancy BMI cut-offs of obesity, either BMI [greater than or equai to] 25 kg/m.sup.2 as recommended by the WHO for Asians or BMI [greater than or equai to] 28 kg/m.sup.2 as suggested by the Working Group on Obesity in China (WGOC), best predicts the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed 11,494 medical records for live singleton deliveries in a tertiary center in Guangzhou, China, between January 2013 and December 2016. The primary outcomes included maternal obesity prevalence, adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, logistic regression, and diagnostics tests. Among the study population, 824 (7.2%) were obese according to the WHO criteria for Asian populations, and this would be reduced to 198 (1.7%) based on the criteria of WGOC. Obesity-related adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, cesarean section, and large for gestational age (P < 0.05). Compared to the WGOC criterion, the WHO for Asians criterion had a higher Youden index in our assessment of its predictive value in identifying risk of obesity-related adverse outcomes for Chinese pregnant women. Women in the BMI range of 25 to 28 kg/m.sup.2 are at high risks for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, which were similar to women with BMI [greater than or equai to] 28 kg/m.sup.2. A lower pre-pregnancy BMI cutoff at 25 kg/m.sup.2 for defining obesity may be appropriate for pregnant women in South China. If WGOC standards are applied to pregnant Chinese populations, a significant proportion of at-risk patients may be missed.
ArticleNumber 77
Audience Academic
Author Wu, Yanxin
Chen, Haitian
Li, Zhuyu
Wang, Dongyu
Ming, Wai-Kit
Wang, Zilian
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yanxin
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Yanxin
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Wai-Kit
  surname: Ming
  fullname: Ming, Wai-Kit
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Dongyu
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Dongyu
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Haitian
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Haitian
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Zhuyu
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Zhuyu
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Zilian
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1310-3346
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Zilian
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30097043$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kktv1DAURiNURB_wA9ggS2zYpDh-xDELpGrEo1IlNnRt2Y4z41HGDrZTMV3w27nTKaVTIWRZiexzj32T77Q6CjG4qnrd4POm6dr3uSGSdzVuYFIp6ttn1UnDhKhFR8TRo_fj6jTnNcYE4659UR1TjKXAjJ5Uv66zD0ukpynFKXldHJqSq2Eugw52i0zst2ijc0Y-9O4nsnNBU_ShZDTEhKJx2ZctbKKycmix8sFlcMRpHnXxMXxAGiVXUsyTs8XfOGTjKqaCcpn77cvq-aDH7F7dP8-q68-fvi--1lffvlwuLq5qy1tc6tZqOrCOGGYE1kRqLSnFxAydMUxqJhgT1jnKJet424qBSsMNES0VrDFE07Pqcu_to14raHSj01ZF7dXdQkxLpVPxdnRKGxg9GRx4GOFD1zktrJSsZ1QIy8D1ce-aZrNxvXWhJD0eSA93gl-pZbxRLe4ExhwE7-4FKf6YXS5q47N146iDi3NWBDguOREdoG-foOs4pwCfCiiJ4X6Ss7_UUkMDPgwRzrU7qbrgTAomudgde_4PCkbvNt5CsgYP6wcFbx43-tDhn_QA0OwBC783Jzc8IA1Wu4SqfUIVJFTtEqpuoUY8qbG-3CUFbuPH_1T-BvIO67w
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_025_07222_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_jog_14787
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12883_024_03678_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_1753_0407_13124
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10995_022_03560_w
crossref_primary_10_1080_21623945_2020_1721692
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpsychires_2024_08_016
crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2021_760934
crossref_primary_10_3390_metabo14010026
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_019_2517_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13091245
crossref_primary_10_4103_sjmms_sjmms_256_22
crossref_primary_10_1155_2023_6669700
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41366_021_00946_8
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3
10.1097/AOG.0000000000000591
10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00008-6
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01931.x
10.1097/AOG.0000000000001465
10.1017/jns.2015.32
10.1155/2013/790654
10.1038/sj.ijo.0803220
10.2337/dc11-S011
10.1016/j.jped.2016.11.014
10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09512-0
10.1007/s10995-009-0544-4
10.1007/s10995-015-1684-3
10.1038/ijo.2013.117
10.1111/1471-0528.12193
10.1038/sj.ijo.802197
10.2337/dc10-2300
10.1038/srep37168
10.1097/GRF.0000000000000042
10.1056/NEJMoa1614362
10.1007/s00404-012-2403-6
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s). 2018
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s). 2018
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7QG
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AN0
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12958-018-0397-z
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
British Nursing Database (Proquest)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
British Nursing Index with Full Text
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Animal Behavior Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database
PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1477-7827
EndPage 7
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_ababad2fe667425f88ea7c994d4377c4
PMC6087005
A549749575
30097043
10_1186_s12958_018_0397_z
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Clinical Medical Project 5010 of Sun Yat-sen University, China
  grantid: 2012004
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 2012004
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29P
2WC
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AN0
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BNQBC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
ICW
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PMFND
3V.
7QG
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-6ca3f482b4b70a29aa93302bf8bb49a47447cee359485667f39b5b2763741b2a3
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1477-7827
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:25:44 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 13:55:34 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 09:58:06 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 03:37:09 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:06:37 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:27:04 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:15:49 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:10:32 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:11:00 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Pregnancy
Body mass index
Obesity
Outcome
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c560t-6ca3f482b4b70a29aa93302bf8bb49a47447cee359485667f39b5b2763741b2a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-1310-3346
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2090425954?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 30097043
PQID 2090425954
PQPubID 42860
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ababad2fe667425f88ea7c994d4377c4
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6087005
proquest_miscellaneous_2087595278
proquest_journals_2090425954
gale_infotracmisc_A549749575
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A549749575
pubmed_primary_30097043
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12958_018_0397_z
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12958_018_0397_z
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-08-10
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-08-10
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-08-10
  day: 10
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Reproductive biology and endocrinology
PublicationTitleAlternate Reprod Biol Endocrinol
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References S Park (397_CR27) 2011; 15
TY Leung (397_CR19) 2008; 115
C Xiong (397_CR3) 2016; 6
Z Wang (397_CR2) 2014; 35
RT Overcash (397_CR7) 2014; 57
A American Diabetes (397_CR16) 2011; 34
R Scott-Pillai (397_CR20) 2013; 120
BF Zhou (397_CR15) 2002; 15
MA Kominiarek (397_CR8) 2015; 19
CJ Chang (397_CR24) 2003; 27
397_CR17
GBDO Collaborators (397_CR1) 2017; 377
MF Kuczmarski (397_CR26) 2001; 101
L Schummers (397_CR5) 2015; 125
397_CR10
WHO EC (397_CR13) 2004; 363
A Mra (397_CR22) 2012; 53
397_CR9
397_CR11
B Zhou (397_CR14) 2002; 23
SS Kim (397_CR4) 2016; 128
M Bryant (397_CR18) 2014; 38
V Choo (397_CR12) 2002; 360
M Chiu (397_CR21) 2011; 34
RG Oliveira (397_CR23) 2017; 93
YM Chen (397_CR25) 2006; 30
Y Liu (397_CR6) 2012; 286
References_xml – volume: 363
  start-page: 157
  year: 2004
  ident: 397_CR13
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3
– volume: 35
  start-page: 354
  year: 2014
  ident: 397_CR2
  publication-title: Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi
– volume: 125
  start-page: 133
  year: 2015
  ident: 397_CR5
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000591
– volume: 23
  start-page: 5
  year: 2002
  ident: 397_CR14
  publication-title: Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi
– volume: 101
  start-page: 28
  year: 2001
  ident: 397_CR26
  publication-title: J Am Diet Assoc
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00008-6
– volume: 115
  start-page: 1529
  year: 2008
  ident: 397_CR19
  publication-title: Bjog
  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01931.x
– volume: 53
  start-page: 545
  issue: 8
  year: 2012
  ident: 397_CR22
  publication-title: Singapore Med J
– volume: 128
  start-page: 104
  year: 2016
  ident: 397_CR4
  publication-title: Obstetrics and gynecology
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001465
– ident: 397_CR11
  doi: 10.1017/jns.2015.32
– ident: 397_CR10
  doi: 10.1155/2013/790654
– volume: 30
  start-page: 918
  year: 2006
  ident: 397_CR25
  publication-title: Int J Obes (Lond)
  doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803220
– volume: 15
  start-page: 83
  year: 2002
  ident: 397_CR15
  publication-title: Biomed Environ Sci
– volume: 34
  start-page: S11
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2011
  ident: 397_CR16
  publication-title: Diabetes Care
  doi: 10.2337/dc11-S011
– volume: 93
  start-page: 525
  year: 2017
  ident: 397_CR23
  publication-title: J Pediatr (Rio J)
  doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2016.11.014
– volume: 360
  start-page: 235
  year: 2002
  ident: 397_CR12
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09512-0
– volume: 15
  start-page: 851
  year: 2011
  ident: 397_CR27
  publication-title: Matern Child Health J
  doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0544-4
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1698
  year: 2015
  ident: 397_CR8
  publication-title: Matern Child Health J
  doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1684-3
– volume: 38
  start-page: 444
  year: 2014
  ident: 397_CR18
  publication-title: Int J Obes (Lond)
  doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.117
– volume: 120
  start-page: 932
  year: 2013
  ident: 397_CR20
  publication-title: Bjog
  doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12193
– volume: 27
  start-page: 253
  year: 2003
  ident: 397_CR24
  publication-title: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
  doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.802197
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1741
  year: 2011
  ident: 397_CR21
  publication-title: Diabetes Care
  doi: 10.2337/dc10-2300
– volume: 6
  start-page: 37168
  year: 2016
  ident: 397_CR3
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/srep37168
– volume: 57
  start-page: 485
  year: 2014
  ident: 397_CR7
  publication-title: Clin Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000042
– ident: 397_CR17
– volume: 377
  start-page: 13
  year: 2017
  ident: 397_CR1
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362
– ident: 397_CR9
– volume: 286
  start-page: 905
  year: 2012
  ident: 397_CR6
  publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2403-6
SSID ssj0020086
Score 2.2813265
Snippet Appropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which pre-pregnancy BMI...
Background Appropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which...
BackgroundAppropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which...
Abstract Background Appropriate classification of obesity is vital for risk assessment and complication prevention during pregnancy. We aimed to explore which...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 77
SubjectTerms Body mass index
Cesarean section
Cohort analysis
Complications and side effects
Data processing
Diabetes mellitus
Gestational age
Gestational diabetes
Health aspects
Health risk assessment
Hypertension
Medical records
Obesity
Outcome
Population studies
Pre-eclampsia
Pregnancy
Pregnant women
Risk assessment
Risk factors
Womens health
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9QwFA-yJy-irh_VXXmCKAhl2zRtkr2N4rIIenJhbyHJJLrgtsNM5zB78G_3vbRTpgh6kdJDm482ycv7aN_7PcbeqLJ0lYhlXipb58j9bK4FMkPprSIRWJeRopG_fG0ur8Tn6_r6INUX-YQN8MDDxJ1Zh8eSx9A0aMXVUalgpddaLEUlpU9IoCjz9sbUaGqRpj7-wyxVc7ZBqVaT0xaFk2mZ382kUALr_5MlH8ikub_kgQC6eMgejJojLIY3fsTuhfYxO160aDXf7uAtJF_O9JH8mP1KngCQAMNXSGJ9AHL3wPM7AWzswHXLHdyi4gwJLhH8todVd9P2G0AtFrohXQAWAiqIQEm2wwb7mLJ9nYOFdejX3T5SEyjT7rqHBFf7hF1dfPr28TIfMy3kHjWePm-8raJQ3AknC8u1tfSdg7uonBPaCimERGlaEbYL6n8yVtrVjiNvQoXEcVs9ZUdt14bnDISzeCeKJnpsWkTLpYtFbOISLwMPGSv2M2_8CENO2TB-mmSOqMYMi2VwsQwtlrnL2PupyWrA4Phb5Q-0nFNFgs9ON5CozEhU5l9ElbF3RAyGNjm-nLdjrAIOkeCyzAKtaommpawzdjKriZvTz4v35GRG5rAxSK_EKnWNz3k9FVNLcnhrQ7elOmhI6ppLlbFnA_VNQ6oo-KYQVcbkjC5nY56XtDc_EnR4g90i333xPybpJbvP044ifOATdtSvt-EUNbTevUqb8TfaNTue
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9UwFA9zvvgi0_lRNyWCKAjVNk2bRBC5imMI88kLewtJbrINtvba2wvePfi3e07aW1Yco9yHNklv05zP5pzfIeSNzHNb8JCnuTRlCtLPpIqDMBTOSFSBZR4wG_nkZ3U85z9Oy9Mdsi1vNbzA1a2uHdaTmreXH_783nwBhv8cGV5WH1egs0oMycJkMSXS63vkPigmgQUNTvi4qYA7_dWwsXnrsIlqigj-_8vpG4pqGkR5Qysd7ZGHgzlJZ_36PyI7vn5M9mc1uNJXG_qWxgDP-OV8n_yN4QE0oogvge46TzEGBH5niLqxobZZbOgVWNM0YihSt-7osrmouxUF05Y2fQ0BaKRgNVKsvO1XcI-xBNgnamjru7bZpm9SLL_bdjRi2D4h86Pvv74dp0P5hdSBGdSllTNF4JJZbkVmmDIGP34wG6S1XBkuOBegYgsEfAGjUIRC2dIyEFhgpVhmiqdkt25q_5xQbg1cCbwKDoZmwTBhQxaqsIBTz3xCsu2b127AJscSGZc6-iiy0v1iaVgsjYulrxPyfhyy7IE57ur8FZdz7IiY2vFC057pgUW1sXAsWPAwF5BkQUpvhFOKL3ghhOMJeYfEoJEW4eGcGRIYYIqIoaVn4GoL8DdFmZDDSU_gWDdt3pKT3hK8ZplC-alK-J_XYzOOxCi42jdr7APepSqZkAl51lPfOKUCM3IyXiRETOhyMudpS31xHvHEK7gtCOMXdz_WAXnAIq8gHPAh2e3atX8JBllnX0U2-wfNZTVw
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Using appropriate pre-pregnancy body mass index cut points for obesity in the Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30097043
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2090425954
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2087595278
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6087005
https://doaj.org/article/ababad2fe667425f88ea7c994d4377c4
Volume 16
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1La9wwEBZtcumltE0fbtJFhdJCwdQP2ZJ7KbslIRQSSmhg6UVIspQEGntrew-bQ357Z2SvE1MIZg1rScayRvPyzDeEfBBxrFPm4jAWKguB-6mwYMAMuVECRWAWO8xGPjnNj8_Zj2W2HBxu7RBWueWJnlGXtUEfORjpBdJXkbFvq78hVo3Cr6tDCY3HZBehy5Cq-fLO4EJ9ffiSGYv8SwuyLcPQLUwqK3h4M5FFHrL_f8Z8TzJNoybviaGjZ-TpoD_Seb_gz8kjW70ge_MKbOfrDf1IfUSnd5XvkVsfD0A9bPgKCK2zFIM-4HeBMBsbqutyQ69BfaYeNJGadUdX9VXVtRR0WVr3RQOgkYKaSLHUtm3hHmPNr69U0cZ2Tb3N16RYb7fpqAetfUnOjw5_fT8Oh3oLoQG9pwtzo1LHRKKZ5pFKCqXQ25FoJ7RmhWKcMQ4yNUWEF9ACuUsLnekEOBSoJTpR6SuyU9WVfUMo0wquOJY7A0MjpxKuXeRyV8Jfm9iARNs3L80ARo41Mf5Ib5SIXPaLJWGxJC6WvAnI53HIqkfieKjzApdz7Igg2v5C3VzIYU9KpeEoE2dhLkBaTgiruCkKVrKUc8MC8gmJQeJWh4czashYgCkiaJacg23NwcDkWUAOJj1hi5pp85ac5MAiWnlH0AF5PzbjSAx7q2y9xj5gThZZwkVAXvfUN04pxRSciKUB4RO6nMx52lJdXXoA8RxuC9z37cOPtU-eJH6vIP7vAdnpmrV9BxpYp2d-m83I7uLw9OfZzPsx4HzCBJzPFr__AUlONp4
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEB6VcoALAsrDUGCReEhIVu312msjIRQeVUofp1bqbdl1dkslaofEEUoP_CR-IzNrO62F1FsV5RDvQ97M2575BuBVHscmES4O41ynIWo_HRYClaEsdU4mMI0dVSPvH2TjI_HtOD1eg799LQylVfY60SvqSV3SM3IM0gviryIVH6e_QuoaRW9X-xYaLVvs2uVvDNnmH3a-IH1fc7799fDzOOy6CoQlWvcmzEqdOJFzI4yMNC-0ppieG5cbIwotpBASLUdCOCbo60iXFCY1HOUQja_hOsF9b8BNNLwRBXvy-CLAo_ige3Ma59nWHG1pSqliVMRWyPB8YPt8i4D_DcElSzjM0rxk9rbvwp3OX2WjlsHuwZqt7sPGqMJY_WzJ3jCfQeofzW_AH59_wDxM-RQZu7GMkkzwe0KwHktm6smSnaG7zjxIIysXDZvWp1UzZ-g7s7ptUoCDDN1SRq297Rz3WPUYe880m9lmVvf1oYz6-84a5kFyH8DRtVDiIaxXdWUfAxNG4xUnMlfi0shpLo2LXOYm-NNyG0DU__Oq7MDPqQfHT-WDoDxTLbEUEksRsdR5AO9WS6Yt8sdVkz8ROVcTCbTbX6hnJ6rTAUob_Ey4s3gWZGWX51bLsijERCRSliKAt8QMilQL3lypuwoJPCKBdKkRxvISA1qZBrA5mIkqoRwO9-ykOpU0VxcCFMDL1TCtpDS7ytYLmoPha5FymQfwqOW-1ZESKvmJRBKAHPDl4MzDker0hwcsz3Bb1PZPrr6tF3BrfLi_p_Z2Dnafwm3u5YawhzdhvZkt7DP0_hrz3Iscg-_XLeP_AGnHba8
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using+appropriate+pre-pregnancy+body+mass+index+cut+points+for+obesity+in+the+Chinese+population%3A+a+retrospective+cohort+study&rft.jtitle=Reproductive+biology+and+endocrinology&rft.au=Wu%2C+Yanxin&rft.au=Wai-Kit%2C+Ming&rft.au=Wang%2C+Dongyu&rft.au=Chen%2C+Haitian&rft.date=2018-08-10&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1477-7827&rft.volume=16&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12958-018-0397-z
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1477-7827&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1477-7827&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1477-7827&client=summon