Simultaneous Determination and Health Risk Assessment of Four High Detection Rate Pesticide Residues in Pu’er Tea from Yunnan, China
Four pesticides with a high detection rate in Pu’er tea have been determined by a QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe) method with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), and combined ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole linear ion trap-tandem mass spectrome...
Saved in:
Published in | Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 27; no. 3; p. 1053 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
MDPI AG
04.02.2022
MDPI |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Four pesticides with a high detection rate in Pu’er tea have been determined by a QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe) method with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), and combined ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole linear ion trap-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTRAP-MS/MS). MWCNs have been compared with other common purification materials, and found to be superior. The matrix effect was systematically studied, and the results show that the MWCNs can quickly and effectively reduce matrix interference values, which were in the range from −17.8 to 13.8. The coefficients (R2) were greater than 0.99, with the limit of quantification ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 μg/kg, and the recovery rate ranging from 74.8% to 105.0%, while the relative standard deviation (RSD) ranged from 3.9% to 6.6%. A total of 300 samples, taken from three areas in which Yunnan Pu’er tea was most commonly produced, tested for four pesticides. The results show that the detection rate of tolfenpyrad in Pu’er tea was 35.7%, which is higher than other pesticides, and the lowest was indoxacarb, with 5.2%. The residual concentrations of chlorpyrifos, triazophos, tolfenpyrad and indoxacarb ranged from 1.10 to 5.28, 0.014 to 0.103, 1.02 to 51.8, and 1.07 to 4.89 mg/kg, respectively. By comparing with China’s pesticide residue limits in tea (GB 2763-2021), the over standard rates of chlorpyrifos, tolfenpyrad, and indoxacarb were 4.35%, 0.87% and 0%, respectively. The risk assessment result obtained with the hazard quotient (HQ) method shows that the HQ of the four pesticides was far less than one, indicating that the risk is considered acceptable for the four pesticides in Pu’er tea. The largest HQ was found for tolfenpyrad, 0.0135, and the smallest was found for indoxacarb, 0.000757, but more attention should be paid to tolfenpyrad in daily diets in the future, because its detection rate, and residual and residual median were all relatively high. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Four pesticides with a high detection rate in Pu’er tea have been determined by a QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe) method with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), and combined ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole linear ion trap-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTRAP-MS/MS). MWCNs have been compared with other common purification materials, and found to be superior. The matrix effect was systematically studied, and the results show that the MWCNs can quickly and effectively reduce matrix interference values, which were in the range from −17.8 to 13.8. The coefficients (R2) were greater than 0.99, with the limit of quantification ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 μg/kg, and the recovery rate ranging from 74.8% to 105.0%, while the relative standard deviation (RSD) ranged from 3.9% to 6.6%. A total of 300 samples, taken from three areas in which Yunnan Pu’er tea was most commonly produced, tested for four pesticides. The results show that the detection rate of tolfenpyrad in Pu’er tea was 35.7%, which is higher than other pesticides, and the lowest was indoxacarb, with 5.2%. The residual concentrations of chlorpyrifos, triazophos, tolfenpyrad and indoxacarb ranged from 1.10 to 5.28, 0.014 to 0.103, 1.02 to 51.8, and 1.07 to 4.89 mg/kg, respectively. By comparing with China’s pesticide residue limits in tea (GB 2763-2021), the over standard rates of chlorpyrifos, tolfenpyrad, and indoxacarb were 4.35%, 0.87% and 0%, respectively. The risk assessment result obtained with the hazard quotient (HQ) method shows that the HQ of the four pesticides was far less than one, indicating that the risk is considered acceptable for the four pesticides in Pu’er tea. The largest HQ was found for tolfenpyrad, 0.0135, and the smallest was found for indoxacarb, 0.000757, but more attention should be paid to tolfenpyrad in daily diets in the future, because its detection rate, and residual and residual median were all relatively high. Four pesticides with a high detection rate in Pu'er tea have been determined by a QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe) method with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), and combined ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole linear ion trap-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTRAP-MS/MS). MWCNs have been compared with other common purification materials, and found to be superior. The matrix effect was systematically studied, and the results show that the MWCNs can quickly and effectively reduce matrix interference values, which were in the range from -17.8 to 13.8. The coefficients (R2) were greater than 0.99, with the limit of quantification ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 μg/kg, and the recovery rate ranging from 74.8% to 105.0%, while the relative standard deviation (RSD) ranged from 3.9% to 6.6%. A total of 300 samples, taken from three areas in which Yunnan Pu'er tea was most commonly produced, tested for four pesticides. The results show that the detection rate of tolfenpyrad in Pu'er tea was 35.7%, which is higher than other pesticides, and the lowest was indoxacarb, with 5.2%. The residual concentrations of chlorpyrifos, triazophos, tolfenpyrad and indoxacarb ranged from 1.10 to 5.28, 0.014 to 0.103, 1.02 to 51.8, and 1.07 to 4.89 mg/kg, respectively. By comparing with China's pesticide residue limits in tea (GB 2763-2021), the over standard rates of chlorpyrifos, tolfenpyrad, and indoxacarb were 4.35%, 0.87% and 0%, respectively. The risk assessment result obtained with the hazard quotient (HQ) method shows that the HQ of the four pesticides was far less than one, indicating that the risk is considered acceptable for the four pesticides in Pu'er tea. The largest HQ was found for tolfenpyrad, 0.0135, and the smallest was found for indoxacarb, 0.000757, but more attention should be paid to tolfenpyrad in daily diets in the future, because its detection rate, and residual and residual median were all relatively high.Four pesticides with a high detection rate in Pu'er tea have been determined by a QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe) method with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), and combined ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole linear ion trap-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTRAP-MS/MS). MWCNs have been compared with other common purification materials, and found to be superior. The matrix effect was systematically studied, and the results show that the MWCNs can quickly and effectively reduce matrix interference values, which were in the range from -17.8 to 13.8. The coefficients (R2) were greater than 0.99, with the limit of quantification ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 μg/kg, and the recovery rate ranging from 74.8% to 105.0%, while the relative standard deviation (RSD) ranged from 3.9% to 6.6%. A total of 300 samples, taken from three areas in which Yunnan Pu'er tea was most commonly produced, tested for four pesticides. The results show that the detection rate of tolfenpyrad in Pu'er tea was 35.7%, which is higher than other pesticides, and the lowest was indoxacarb, with 5.2%. The residual concentrations of chlorpyrifos, triazophos, tolfenpyrad and indoxacarb ranged from 1.10 to 5.28, 0.014 to 0.103, 1.02 to 51.8, and 1.07 to 4.89 mg/kg, respectively. By comparing with China's pesticide residue limits in tea (GB 2763-2021), the over standard rates of chlorpyrifos, tolfenpyrad, and indoxacarb were 4.35%, 0.87% and 0%, respectively. The risk assessment result obtained with the hazard quotient (HQ) method shows that the HQ of the four pesticides was far less than one, indicating that the risk is considered acceptable for the four pesticides in Pu'er tea. The largest HQ was found for tolfenpyrad, 0.0135, and the smallest was found for indoxacarb, 0.000757, but more attention should be paid to tolfenpyrad in daily diets in the future, because its detection rate, and residual and residual median were all relatively high. Four pesticides with a high detection rate in Pu’er tea have been determined by a QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe) method with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), and combined ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole linear ion trap-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTRAP-MS/MS). MWCNs have been compared with other common purification materials, and found to be superior. The matrix effect was systematically studied, and the results show that the MWCNs can quickly and effectively reduce matrix interference values, which were in the range from −17.8 to 13.8. The coefficients ( R 2 ) were greater than 0.99, with the limit of quantification ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 μg/kg, and the recovery rate ranging from 74.8% to 105.0%, while the relative standard deviation (RSD) ranged from 3.9% to 6.6%. A total of 300 samples, taken from three areas in which Yunnan Pu’er tea was most commonly produced, tested for four pesticides. The results show that the detection rate of tolfenpyrad in Pu’er tea was 35.7%, which is higher than other pesticides, and the lowest was indoxacarb, with 5.2%. The residual concentrations of chlorpyrifos, triazophos, tolfenpyrad and indoxacarb ranged from 1.10 to 5.28, 0.014 to 0.103, 1.02 to 51.8, and 1.07 to 4.89 mg/kg, respectively. By comparing with China’s pesticide residue limits in tea (GB 2763-2021), the over standard rates of chlorpyrifos, tolfenpyrad, and indoxacarb were 4.35%, 0.87% and 0%, respectively. The risk assessment result obtained with the hazard quotient (HQ) method shows that the HQ of the four pesticides was far less than one, indicating that the risk is considered acceptable for the four pesticides in Pu’er tea. The largest HQ was found for tolfenpyrad, 0.0135, and the smallest was found for indoxacarb, 0.000757, but more attention should be paid to tolfenpyrad in daily diets in the future, because its detection rate, and residual and residual median were all relatively high. Four pesticides with a high detection rate in Pu'er tea have been determined by a QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe) method with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), and combined ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole linear ion trap-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTRAP-MS/MS). MWCNs have been compared with other common purification materials, and found to be superior. The matrix effect was systematically studied, and the results show that the MWCNs can quickly and effectively reduce matrix interference values, which were in the range from -17.8 to 13.8. The coefficients ( ) were greater than 0.99, with the limit of quantification ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 μg/kg, and the recovery rate ranging from 74.8% to 105.0%, while the relative standard deviation (RSD) ranged from 3.9% to 6.6%. A total of 300 samples, taken from three areas in which Yunnan Pu'er tea was most commonly produced, tested for four pesticides. The results show that the detection rate of tolfenpyrad in Pu'er tea was 35.7%, which is higher than other pesticides, and the lowest was indoxacarb, with 5.2%. The residual concentrations of chlorpyrifos, triazophos, tolfenpyrad and indoxacarb ranged from 1.10 to 5.28, 0.014 to 0.103, 1.02 to 51.8, and 1.07 to 4.89 mg/kg, respectively. By comparing with China's pesticide residue limits in tea (GB 2763-2021), the over standard rates of chlorpyrifos, tolfenpyrad, and indoxacarb were 4.35%, 0.87% and 0%, respectively. The risk assessment result obtained with the hazard quotient (HQ) method shows that the HQ of the four pesticides was far less than one, indicating that the risk is considered acceptable for the four pesticides in Pu'er tea. The largest HQ was found for tolfenpyrad, 0.0135, and the smallest was found for indoxacarb, 0.000757, but more attention should be paid to tolfenpyrad in daily diets in the future, because its detection rate, and residual and residual median were all relatively high. |
Author | Chen, Xing-Lian Li, Mao-Xuan Lin, Tao Li, Yan-Gang Liu, Hong-Cheng Guo, Jin Li, Meng-Xia Cheng, Long Tang, Yu-Feng |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Quality Standards and Testing Technology Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Science, Kunming 650223, China; lintaonj@126.com (T.L.); chen544141152@163.com (X.-L.C.); limx1970@126.com (M.-X.L.); yglikm@sina.com (Y.-G.L.) 2 Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Kunming), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Kunming 650223, China 5 SCIEX Analytical Instrument Trading Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200335, China; long.cheng@sciex.com 4 College of Agronomy and Life Sciences, Zhaotong University, Zhaotong 657000, China; tyfsunny@163.com 3 School of Medicine, Yunnan University of Business Management, Kunming 650106, China; gjin0111@163.com (J.G.); limengxia2022@163.com (M.-X.L.) |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 3 School of Medicine, Yunnan University of Business Management, Kunming 650106, China; gjin0111@163.com (J.G.); limengxia2022@163.com (M.-X.L.) – name: 1 Quality Standards and Testing Technology Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Science, Kunming 650223, China; lintaonj@126.com (T.L.); chen544141152@163.com (X.-L.C.); limx1970@126.com (M.-X.L.); yglikm@sina.com (Y.-G.L.) – name: 2 Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Kunming), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Kunming 650223, China – name: 4 College of Agronomy and Life Sciences, Zhaotong University, Zhaotong 657000, China; tyfsunny@163.com – name: 5 SCIEX Analytical Instrument Trading Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200335, China; long.cheng@sciex.com |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Tao orcidid: 0000-0001-9420-5071 surname: Lin fullname: Lin, Tao – sequence: 2 givenname: Xing-Lian surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Xing-Lian – sequence: 3 givenname: Jin surname: Guo fullname: Guo, Jin – sequence: 4 givenname: Meng-Xia surname: Li fullname: Li, Meng-Xia – sequence: 5 givenname: Yu-Feng surname: Tang fullname: Tang, Yu-Feng – sequence: 6 givenname: Mao-Xuan surname: Li fullname: Li, Mao-Xuan – sequence: 7 givenname: Yan-Gang surname: Li fullname: Li, Yan-Gang – sequence: 8 givenname: Long surname: Cheng fullname: Cheng, Long – sequence: 9 givenname: Hong-Cheng surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Hong-Cheng |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164318$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9ks1u1DAUhSNURH_gAdggS2xYMGDHdmJvkKqBMpUqUQ1lwcryz82Mh8QudoLEjhXvwOvxJLgzpWqLxMqW_Z3j63PvYbUXYoCqekrwK0olfj3EHuzUQ65bTAnm9EF1QFiNZxQzuXdrv18d5rzBuCaM8EfVPuWkYZSIg-rnRz9M_agDxCmjtzBCGnzQo48B6eDQAnQ_rtHS5y_oOGfIeYAwotihkzgltPCr9VZlt4qlHgGdQx699Q7QErJ3E2TkAzqffv_4BQldgEZdigP6PIWgw0s0X5f3HlcPO91neHK9HlWfTt5dzBezsw_vT-fHZzPLuRxnWjtsiSXQtLoxnTGd4K11pqXCYCMs7TjXxFjZiQaEk87WdcOI1UxY7jDQo-p05-ui3qjL5AedvquovdoexLRSOpXqe1ANt4xhbRy3loHQppa2tpIajSVzsi1eb3Zel5MZwNmSS9L9HdO7N8Gv1Sp-U0JQSQgtBi-uDVL8WmIa1eCzhb7fdUPVTS0x55TJgj6_h25K_KFEdUW1oqFtIwr17HZFN6X8bXcByA6wKeacoLtBCFZXI6X-Gamiae9prB-3A1I-5fv_KP8APjbXXQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_162876 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2023_2225613 crossref_primary_10_1111_1541_4337_13167 crossref_primary_10_1002_tox_24133 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_175320 crossref_primary_10_1080_19440049_2023_2232876 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_afres_2025_100759 crossref_primary_10_7831_ras_12_0_347 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chemosphere_2024_143550 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2023_136103 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/jsfa.11253 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.175 10.1021/jf102476m 10.1080/01480545.2020.1802476 10.1093/chromsci/46.3.209 10.1039/C4AY01098A 10.1039/D1RA00046B 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.12.060 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.02.021 10.1016/j.jfda.2016.03.014 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.152 10.1590/fst.07417 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.097 10.1080/03067319.2018.1518439 10.1002/jssc.200800605 10.1007/s11356-013-2022-1 10.1007/s40003-017-0277-3 10.1007/s12161-021-01985-7 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.08.007 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.08.012 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129186 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.01.007 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128986 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.02.081 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112101 10.5740/jaoacint.12-337 10.1039/C7AY02145C 10.1080/03601234.2021.1944962 10.1021/jf506103d 10.1603/0022-0493-95.2.360 10.1111/1750-3841.15826 10.1039/C7AY02773G 10.1021/ac202661j 10.1002/chir.22422 10.1002/rcm.9199 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.094 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2022 by the authors. 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2022 by the authors. 2022 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.3390/molecules27031053 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection PML(ProQuest Medical Library) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Open Access Full Text |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Chemistry |
EISSN | 1420-3049 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_65c440abd5cc4e8ab29c2c93ba094d97 PMC8839113 35164318 10_3390_molecules27031053 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | China Beijing China United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China – name: Beijing China – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 123 2WC 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AADQD AAFWJ AAHBH AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS AEGXH AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AFZYC AIAGR ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CITATION CS3 D1I DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EMOBN ESX FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HH5 HMCUK HYE HZ~ I09 IAO IHR ITC KQ8 LK8 M1P MODMG O-U O9- OK1 P2P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RPM SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP ~8M CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-aad0c1c1e67a6bfbbf857cdb738b0b8c3f55a1bc9f86e8d9dc22641ca48c5d0e3 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1420-3049 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:17:59 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:28:33 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 10:10:42 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 09:49:28 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:45:50 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:12:11 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:47 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | Pu’er tea multiwalled carbon nanotubes risk assessment high detection rate pesticides |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c559t-aad0c1c1e67a6bfbbf857cdb738b0b8c3f55a1bc9f86e8d9dc22641ca48c5d0e3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-9420-5071 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2627863768?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 35164318 |
PQID | 2627863768 |
PQPubID | 2032355 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_65c440abd5cc4e8ab29c2c93ba094d97 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8839113 proquest_miscellaneous_2629055349 proquest_journals_2627863768 pubmed_primary_35164318 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules27031053 crossref_citationtrail_10_3390_molecules27031053 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20220204 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-02-04 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 2 year: 2022 text: 20220204 day: 4 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Switzerland |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Switzerland – name: Basel |
PublicationTitle | Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Molecules |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | MDPI AG MDPI |
Publisher_xml | – name: MDPI AG – name: MDPI |
References | Feng (ref_7) 2017; 10 Chen (ref_42) 2015; 63 Chen (ref_43) 2017; 216 Zhu (ref_17) 2019; 276 Gao (ref_36) 2017; 9 ref_13 Wei (ref_9) 2017; 96 ref_12 Peng (ref_5) 2017; 6 Huang (ref_15) 2019; 275 Bai (ref_8) 2021; 101 ref_31 New (ref_33) 2008; 46 ref_30 Surma (ref_22) 2014; 21 Lv (ref_20) 2021; 14 Yaqub (ref_28) 2018; 38 Hikiji (ref_11) 2013; 20 Liu (ref_10) 2002; 95 Li (ref_26) 2018; 10 Hsieh (ref_3) 2016; 24 Xu (ref_4) 2021; 350 Wang (ref_41) 2019; 121 Chen (ref_29) 2011; 22 Han (ref_35) 2021; 151 Du (ref_21) 2022; 36 Beneta (ref_19) 2018; 98 Jiao (ref_24) 2016; 210 Li (ref_27) 2013; 96 Jiang (ref_1) 2018; 98 Qiong (ref_2) 2014; 27 Zhang (ref_25) 2010; 58 Xiao (ref_34) 2014; 6 Huang (ref_37) 2009; 32 ref_44 Zhang (ref_39) 2015; 27 ref_40 Dou (ref_6) 2021; 71 Dong (ref_14) 2021; 56 Harischandra (ref_16) 2021; 347 Yao (ref_18) 2021; 86 Wu (ref_23) 2017; 229 Stahnke (ref_32) 2012; 84 Wang (ref_38) 2021; 11 |
References_xml | – volume: 101 start-page: 5992 year: 2021 ident: ref_8 article-title: Residue behavior, transfer and risk assessment of tolfenpyrad, dinotefuran and its metabolites during tea growing and tea brewing publication-title: J. Sci. Food Agri. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11253 – volume: 216 start-page: 1 year: 2017 ident: ref_43 article-title: Evaluation of transfer rates of multiple pesticides from green tea into infusion using water as pressurized liquid extraction solvent and ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry publication-title: Food Chem. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.175 – ident: ref_30 – volume: 58 start-page: 11553 year: 2010 ident: ref_25 article-title: Analysis of agricultural residues on tea using d-SPE sample preparation with GC-NCI-MS and UHPLC-MS/MS publication-title: J. Agri. Food Chem. doi: 10.1021/jf102476m – ident: ref_44 doi: 10.1080/01480545.2020.1802476 – volume: 46 start-page: 209 year: 2008 ident: ref_33 article-title: Evaluation of BEH C18, BEH HILIC, and HSS T3 (C18) Column Chemistries for the UPLC-MS-MS Analysis of Glutathione, Glutathione Disulfide, and Ophthalmic Acid in Mouse Liver and Human Plasma publication-title: J. Chromatogr. Sci. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/46.3.209 – volume: 6 start-page: 8045 year: 2014 ident: ref_34 article-title: Rapid and reliable method for analysis of raw and honey-processed astragalus by UPLC/ESI-Q-TOF-MS using HSS T3 columns publication-title: Anal. Methods doi: 10.1039/C4AY01098A – volume: 11 start-page: 12162 year: 2021 ident: ref_38 article-title: Determination of 12 insect growth regulator residues in foods of different matrixes by modified QuEChERS and UPLC-MS/MS publication-title: RSC Adv. doi: 10.1039/D1RA00046B – volume: 121 start-page: 776 year: 2019 ident: ref_41 article-title: Transfer of pesticide residue during tea brewing: Understanding the effects of pesticide’s physico-chemical parameters on its transfer behavior publication-title: Food Res. Int. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.12.060 – volume: 96 start-page: 204 year: 2017 ident: ref_9 article-title: Susceptibility of Empoasca vitis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) populations from the main tea-growing regions of China to thirteen insecticides publication-title: Crop. Prot. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.02.021 – volume: 24 start-page: 722 year: 2016 ident: ref_3 article-title: Antibacterial and laxative activities of strictinin isolated from Pu’er tea (Camellia sinensis) publication-title: J. Food Drug Anal. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2016.03.014 – volume: 276 start-page: 202 year: 2019 ident: ref_17 article-title: Simultaneous determination of 131 pesticides in tea by on-line GPC-GC–MS/MS using graphitized multi-walled carbon nanotubes as dispersive solid phase extraction sorbent publication-title: Food Chem. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.152 – ident: ref_40 – volume: 38 start-page: 625 year: 2018 ident: ref_28 article-title: Monitoring and risk assessment due to presence of heavy metals and pesticides in tea samples publication-title: Food Sci. Technol. doi: 10.1590/fst.07417 – volume: 210 start-page: 26 year: 2016 ident: ref_24 article-title: Optimized combination of dilution and refined QuEChERS to overcome matrix effects of six types of tea for determination eight neonicotinoid insecticides by ultra performance liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry publication-title: Food Chem. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.097 – volume: 98 start-page: 987 year: 2018 ident: ref_19 article-title: Multiresidue GC-MS/MS pesticide analysis for evaluation of tea and herbal infusion safety publication-title: Int. J. Environ. An. Chem. doi: 10.1080/03067319.2018.1518439 – volume: 32 start-page: 1294 year: 2009 ident: ref_37 article-title: Simultaneous determination of 103 pesticide residues in tea samples by LC-MS/MS publication-title: J. Sep. Sci. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200800605 – volume: 21 start-page: 1326 year: 2014 ident: ref_22 article-title: Comparison of different modifications on QuEChERS sample preparation method for PAHs determination in black, green, red and white tea publication-title: Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-2022-1 – volume: 6 start-page: 436 year: 2017 ident: ref_5 article-title: Discrimination of Unfermented Pu’er Tea Aroma of Different Years Based on Electronic Nose publication-title: Agric. Res. doi: 10.1007/s40003-017-0277-3 – volume: 14 start-page: 1 year: 2021 ident: ref_20 article-title: Quantification and Confirmation of Zearalenone Using a LC-MS/MS QTRAP System in Multiple Reaction Monitoring and Enhanced Product Ion Scan Modes publication-title: Food Anal. Method. doi: 10.1007/s12161-021-01985-7 – volume: 98 start-page: 204 year: 2018 ident: ref_1 article-title: Chemical compositions of Pu’er tea fermented by Eurotium Cristatum and their lipid-lowering activity publication-title: LWT-Food Sci. Technol. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.08.007 – volume: 20 start-page: 962 year: 2013 ident: ref_11 article-title: Acute fatal poisoning with Tolfenpyrad publication-title: J. Forensic. Leg. Med. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.08.012 – volume: 350 start-page: 129186 year: 2021 ident: ref_4 article-title: Characterizing volatile metabolites in raw Pu’er tea stored in wet-hot or dry-cold environments by performing metabolomic analysis and using the molecular sensory science approach publication-title: Food Chem. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129186 – volume: 22 start-page: 1114 year: 2011 ident: ref_29 article-title: Evaluation of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from Xiamen, China publication-title: Food Control doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.01.007 – ident: ref_31 – volume: 347 start-page: 128986 year: 2021 ident: ref_16 article-title: Simultaneous determination of 79 pesticides in pigeonpea grains using GC–MS/MS and LC–MS/MS publication-title: Food Chem. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128986 – ident: ref_12 – volume: 229 start-page: 580 year: 2017 ident: ref_23 article-title: Multiresidue method for the determination of pesticides in Oolong tea using QuEChERS by gas chromatography-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry publication-title: Food Chem. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.02.081 – volume: 151 start-page: 112101 year: 2021 ident: ref_35 article-title: Determination of Xinjunan pesticide residue in foodstuffs of plant origin by a modified QuEChERS method and ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry publication-title: LWT doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112101 – volume: 27 start-page: 1015 year: 2014 ident: ref_2 article-title: History of Pu’er Tea and comparative study for the effect of its various extracts on lipid-lowering diet publication-title: Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. – volume: 96 start-page: 1453 year: 2013 ident: ref_27 article-title: Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of Matrix Effects on 110 Pesticide Residues in 28 Tea Matrixes publication-title: J. AOAC Int. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.12-337 – volume: 71 start-page: 81 year: 2021 ident: ref_6 article-title: Empirical analysis of Pu’er tea price bubble measurement based on GSADF method publication-title: Acta. Agr. Scand. B.-S. P. – volume: 9 start-page: 6769 year: 2017 ident: ref_36 article-title: Simultaneous determination of bisphenol A and tetrabromobisphenol A in tea using a modified QuEChERS sample preparation method coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry publication-title: Anal. Methods doi: 10.1039/C7AY02145C – ident: ref_13 – volume: 56 start-page: 771 year: 2021 ident: ref_14 article-title: Simultaneous determination of 14 pesticide residues in tea by multi-plug filtration cleanup combined with LC-MS/MS publication-title: J. Environ. Sci. Heal. B. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2021.1944962 – volume: 63 start-page: 723 year: 2015 ident: ref_42 article-title: Transfer rates of 19 typical pesticides and the relationship with their physicochemical property publication-title: J. Agri. Food Chem. doi: 10.1021/jf506103d – volume: 95 start-page: 360 year: 2002 ident: ref_10 article-title: Toxicity, persistence, and efficacy of indoxacarb on cabbage looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on cabbage publication-title: J. Econ. Entomol. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-95.2.360 – volume: 86 start-page: 3743 year: 2021 ident: ref_18 article-title: Occurrence of pesticides in white tea and a corresponding risk exposure assessment for the different residents in Fujian, China publication-title: J. Food Sci. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15826 – volume: 10 start-page: 855 year: 2018 ident: ref_26 article-title: Selection of representative matrices for the multiresidue analysis of pesticides in tea by GC-MS/MS publication-title: Anal. Methods doi: 10.1039/C7AY02773G – volume: 84 start-page: 1474 year: 2012 ident: ref_32 article-title: Reduction of matrix effects in liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry by dilution of the sample extracts: How much dilution is needed? publication-title: Anal. Chem. doi: 10.1021/ac202661j – volume: 27 start-page: 262 year: 2015 ident: ref_39 article-title: Enantioselective degradation of indoxacarb from different commercial formulations applied to tea publication-title: Chirality doi: 10.1002/chir.22422 – volume: 10 start-page: 72 year: 2017 ident: ref_7 article-title: Building an ecological tea garden, promoting the sustainable development of Pu’er tea industry publication-title: Yunnan Agri. – volume: 36 start-page: e9199 year: 2022 ident: ref_21 article-title: Quantitative analysis of 17 hypoglycemic drugs in fingerprints using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometry publication-title: Rapid Commun. Mass. Sp. doi: 10.1002/rcm.9199 – volume: 275 start-page: 255 year: 2019 ident: ref_15 article-title: Determination of multi-pesticide residues in green tea with a modified QuEChERS protocol coupled to HPLC-MS/MS publication-title: Food Chem. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.094 |
SSID | ssj0021415 |
Score | 2.4304035 |
Snippet | Four pesticides with a high detection rate in Pu’er tea have been determined by a QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe) method with... Four pesticides with a high detection rate in Pu'er tea have been determined by a QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe) method with... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 1053 |
SubjectTerms | Carbon black China Chromatography Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods Farmers Gas flow high detection rate pesticides Humans Mass spectrometry multiwalled carbon nanotubes Nanotubes, Carbon - chemistry Pesticide Residues - analysis Pesticides Pu’er tea Risk assessment Risk Assessment - methods Scientific imaging Supermarkets Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods Tea Tea - chemistry |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Open Access Full Text dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQL-WCoLwCLRokToiodmwn9rEtrCokULW0UjlFfooISFF3e-fEf-Dv8UsYx0nUBQQXrvFDE894HvLMN4Q8k15JwUxdoi_uS-FiU-oofRl1NLqSlnmZ6p3fvK2Pz8Trc3l-rdVXygnL8MD54PZr6YSgxnrpnAjK2Eq7ymluDQYmXg915GjzpmBqDLUY2qX8hskxqN__nFvNhlWV4Nqp5BtWaADr_5OH-Wui5DXLs7hNbo0uIxxkUu-QG6HfIdtHU6e2u-Tbuy7lBZo-YBgPL6cEl3TkYHoPudQIlt3qIxzMSJxwEWGBe0NK9RhWDSUOsETvE04S-IbrfIBlQHlFeqHr4eTqx9fv4RJOg4FUlwLv0f01_QsYunDfI2eLV6dHx-XYX6F0GEesS2M8dcyxUDemttHaqGTjvG24stQqx6OUhlmno6qD8tq7VHXLEg66k54Gfp9s9Rd9eEggUuUb4TlHFYCsj1pEispCKItbG1cVhE7n3boRfDz1wPjUYhCSWNT-xqKCPJ-XfMnIG3-bfJiYOE9MoNnDBxSldhSl9l-iVJDdSQTa8Sav2qquGlWjGlYFeToPI4PTw0pmbJqjqZRc6II8yBIzU8IlBqSoOAvSbMjSBqmbI333YcD5Vui8MsYf_Y9_e0xuVqlwI-Wbi12ytb68CnvoTq3tk-Hm_ARORiUL priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Simultaneous Determination and Health Risk Assessment of Four High Detection Rate Pesticide Residues in Pu’er Tea from Yunnan, China |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164318 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2627863768 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2629055349 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8839113 https://doaj.org/article/65c440abd5cc4e8ab29c2c93ba094d97 |
Volume | 27 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagPcClKs8GyspInBBRk9hO7BNqS5cKiWq1tNJyivyEqJBtd7f3nvgP_D1-CTN5lQXUSw7xQ5bn4Rl75htCXgknBU91HoMt7mJuQxGrIFwcVNAqEyZ1AvOdP57kx2f8w0zMugu3ZRdW2evERlG7ucU78r0szwqZgzjItxeXMVaNwtfVroTGXbKJ0GXI1cXsxuFK4XRqXzIZuPZ739uCs36ZIWh7ItjaWdRA9v_Pzvw7XPKP82e8TbY6w5Hut5R-QO74-iG5d9jXa3tEfnyqMDpQ1x6cefquD3PBjae6drRNOKLTanlO9wc8TjoPdAxzUwz4aEY1iQ50CjYonSAEh62cp1MPXAvrpVVNJ1e_rn_6BT31mmJ2Cv0MRrCu39CmFvdjcjY-Oj08jrsqC7EFb2IVa-0Sm9rU54XOTTAmSFFYZwomTWKkZUEInRqrgsy9dMpZzL1NEQ3dCpd49oRs1PPa7xAaEukK7hgDRQAMEBQPCagMLg1MrW0WkaTf79J2EORYCeNbCa4Ikqj8h0QReT0MuWjxN27rfIBEHDoidHbzY774UnaSWObCcp5o44S13EttMmUzq5jR4Ok6VURkt2eBspPnZXnDfRF5OTQDgfF5pSUs9lGJEIyriDxtOWZYCRPgloL6jEixxktrS11vqauvDdq3BBM2Tdmz25f1nNzPMDED48n5LtlYLa78CzCXVmbUyAR85fj9iGweHJ1MpqPm6uE3RYAfTA |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Jb9QwFLZKOZQLYidQwEhwQURNYjuxDwiVlmFKF1XDVCqn4BVGQKbMIsSNE_-BP8GP4pfwXjIJDKDeeo0XWX57_N77CHkgnBQ81XkMvriLuQ1FrIJwcVBBq0yY1Amsd94_yPtH_OWxOF4hP9paGEyrbHVirajd2OI_8o0szwqZgzjIpyefYkSNwtfVFkKjYYtd_-UzhGzTJzvbQN-HWdZ7PtzqxwtUgdiC9zyLtXaJTW3q80LnJhgTpCisMwWTJjHSsiCETo1VQeZeOuUs1pqm2P3bCpd4BvueI-c5A0uOlem9F12Al4I1bF5OYTDZ-NgA3Ppphk3iE8GWbF8NEfA_v_bv9Mw_7F3vErm4cFTpZsNZl8mKr66Qta0WH-4q-fZqhNmIuvLj-ZRut2k1SGiqK0ebAic6GE3f082u_ycdB9qDvSkmmNSr6sIKOgCflx5iyw87cp4OPEgJnJeOKno4__n1u5_QodcUq2Hoa3C6dfWY1tjf18jRmdz_dbJajSt_k9CQSFdwxxgoHmC4oHhIQEVxaWBrbbOIJO19l3bR8hyRNz6UEPogicp_SBSRR92Sk6bfx2mTnyERu4nYqrv-MJ68LReSX-bCcp5o44S13EttMmUzq5jREFk7VURkvWWBcqE_puVvbo_I_W4YCIzPOQ1hcY5KhGBcReRGwzHdSZiAMBjUdUSKJV5aOurySDV6V3cXl-Aypym7dfqx7pG1_nB_r9zbOdi9TS5kWBSCuex8nazOJnN_B1y1mblbywclb85aIH8BGrpbgQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbKVgIuiDeBAkaCCyLaJI4T-4BQ2-2qpbBaLa1UTsFPWAHZ0t0V4saJ_8Bf4efwS5jJCxZQb70mtmVlHp6JZ76PkIfcCp7GKgshFrdhanweSs9t6KVXMuE6thz7nV-Ost3D9PkRP1ojP9peGCyrbH1i5ajtzOA_8n6SJbnIwBxE3zdlEePB8NnxpxAZpPCmtaXTqFVk3335DOnb_OneAGT9KEmGOwfbu2HDMBAaiKQXoVI2MrGJXZarTHutveC5sTpnQkdaGOY5V7E20ovMCSutwb7TGJHADbeRY7DuObKeY1bUI-tbO6PxpEv3Yjgb63tUxmTU_1jT3bp5gpDxEWcrJ2FFGPC_KPfvYs0_Tr_hZXKpCVvpZq1nV8iaK6-SC9stW9w18u3VFGsTVelmyzkdtEU2KHaqSkvrdic6mc7f080ODZTOPB3C2hTLTapZVZsFnUAETMcIAGKm1tGJA5uB_dJpScfLn1-_uxN64BTF3hj6GkJwVT6hFRP4dXJ4JhK4QXrlrHS3CPWRsHlqGQM3BOrnZeojcFip0LC0MklAovZ7F6YBQEcejg8FJEIoouIfEQXkcTfluEb_OG3wFgqxG4jA3dWD2cnbovEDRcZNmkZKW25M6oTSiTSJkUwryLOtzAOy0apA0XiTefFb9wPyoHsNAsbLnVqwOEZGnLNUBuRmrTHdThiHpBicd0DyFV1a2erqm3L6rsIaFxBAxzG7ffq27pPzYIzFi73R_h1yMcEOESxsTzdIb3GydHchblvoe42BUPLmrG3yF3YZYRM |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simultaneous+Determination+and+Health+Risk+Assessment+of+Four+High+Detection+Rate+Pesticide+Residues+in+Pu%E2%80%99er+Tea+from+Yunnan%2C+China&rft.jtitle=Molecules+%28Basel%2C+Switzerland%29&rft.au=Lin%2C+Tao&rft.au=Chen%2C+Xing-Lian&rft.au=Guo%2C+Jin&rft.au=Li%2C+Meng-Xia&rft.date=2022-02-04&rft.pub=MDPI&rft.eissn=1420-3049&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390%2Fmolecules27031053&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35164318&rft.externalDocID=PMC8839113 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1420-3049&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1420-3049&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1420-3049&client=summon |