Small bowel injury induced by selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors : a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing celecoxib and meloxicam
Background Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors are less harmful to the small bowel mucosa than non-selective anti-inflammatory drugs. We aimed to compare the severity of small bowel mucosal injury in healthy volunteers induced by two selective COX-2 inhibitors, celecoxib and meloxicam, in a...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of gastroenterology Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 387 - 393 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Japan
Springer Japan
01.04.2012
Springer Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors are less harmful to the small bowel mucosa than non-selective anti-inflammatory drugs. We aimed to compare the severity of small bowel mucosal injury in healthy volunteers induced by two selective COX-2 inhibitors, celecoxib and meloxicam, in a randomized, double-blind trial, using capsule endoscopy (CE).
Methods
Twenty-nine healthy subjects were randomized to take either celecoxib (200 mg twice daily) or meloxicam (10 mg once daily) for 2 weeks. The incidence and the number of small bowel mucosal injuries (bleeding, ulcers, and erosions) observed by CE were compared between the two groups.
Results
The overall incidence of small bowel mucosal injury was not different between the celecoxib group (6 of 14 subjects, 42.9%) and the meloxicam group (4 of 15 subjects, 26.7%,
P
= 0.45). In subjects with positive CE findings, the number of ulcers was greater in the meloxicam group than in the celecoxib group (
P
= 0.02), while such a trend was not found with regard to erosions (
P
= 0.52). The distribution of mucosal lesions within the small bowel was similar in the two groups.
Conclusions
Selective COX-2 inhibitors are not completely safe for the small bowel. The mucosal lesions may be less severe with celecoxib than with meloxicam. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0944-1174 1435-5922 1435-5922 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00535-011-0501-z |