Comparison of Answers between ChatGPT and Human Dieticians to Common Nutrition Questions
Background. More people than ever seek nutrition information from online sources. The chatbot ChatGPT has seen staggering popularity since its inception and may become a resource for information in nutrition. However, the adequacy of ChatGPT to answer questions in the field of nutrition has not been...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of nutrition and metabolism Vol. 2023; pp. 1 - 9 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Hindawi
07.11.2023
John Wiley & Sons, Inc Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background. More people than ever seek nutrition information from online sources. The chatbot ChatGPT has seen staggering popularity since its inception and may become a resource for information in nutrition. However, the adequacy of ChatGPT to answer questions in the field of nutrition has not been investigated. Thus, the aim of this research was to investigate the competency of ChatGPT in answering common nutrition questions. Methods. Dieticians were asked to provide their most commonly asked nutrition questions and their own answers to them. We then asked the same questions to ChatGPT and sent both sets of answers to other dieticians (N = 18) or nutritionists and experts in the domain of each question (N = 9) to be graded based on scientific correctness, actionability, and comprehensibility. The grades were also averaged to give an overall score, and group means of the answers to each question were compared using permutation tests. Results. The overall grades for ChatGPT were higher than those from the dieticians for the overall scores in five of the eight questions we received. ChatGPT also had higher grades on five occasions for scientific correctness, four for actionability, and five for comprehensibility. In contrast, none of the answers from the dieticians had a higher average score than ChatGPT for any of the questions, both overall and for each of the grading components. Conclusions. Our results suggest that ChatGPT can be used to answer nutrition questions that are frequently asked to dieticians and provide encouraging support for the role of chatbots in offering nutrition support. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background. More people than ever seek nutrition information from online sources. The chatbot ChatGPT has seen staggering popularity since its inception and may become a resource for information in nutrition. However, the adequacy of ChatGPT to answer questions in the field of nutrition has not been investigated. Thus, the aim of this research was to investigate the competency of ChatGPT in answering common nutrition questions. Methods. Dieticians were asked to provide their most commonly asked nutrition questions and their own answers to them. We then asked the same questions to ChatGPT and sent both sets of answers to other dieticians (N=18) or nutritionists and experts in the domain of each question (N=9) to be graded based on scientific correctness, actionability, and comprehensibility. The grades were also averaged to give an overall score, and group means of the answers to each question were compared using permutation tests. Results. The overall grades for ChatGPT were higher than those from the dieticians for the overall scores in five of the eight questions we received. ChatGPT also had higher grades on five occasions for scientific correctness, four for actionability, and five for comprehensibility. In contrast, none of the answers from the dieticians had a higher average score than ChatGPT for any of the questions, both overall and for each of the grading components. Conclusions. Our results suggest that ChatGPT can be used to answer nutrition questions that are frequently asked to dieticians and provide encouraging support for the role of chatbots in offering nutrition support. More people than ever seek nutrition information from online sources. The chatbot ChatGPT has seen staggering popularity since its inception and may become a resource for information in nutrition. However, the adequacy of ChatGPT to answer questions in the field of nutrition has not been investigated. Thus, the aim of this research was to investigate the competency of ChatGPT in answering common nutrition questions.BackgroundMore people than ever seek nutrition information from online sources. The chatbot ChatGPT has seen staggering popularity since its inception and may become a resource for information in nutrition. However, the adequacy of ChatGPT to answer questions in the field of nutrition has not been investigated. Thus, the aim of this research was to investigate the competency of ChatGPT in answering common nutrition questions.Dieticians were asked to provide their most commonly asked nutrition questions and their own answers to them. We then asked the same questions to ChatGPT and sent both sets of answers to other dieticians (N = 18) or nutritionists and experts in the domain of each question (N = 9) to be graded based on scientific correctness, actionability, and comprehensibility. The grades were also averaged to give an overall score, and group means of the answers to each question were compared using permutation tests.MethodsDieticians were asked to provide their most commonly asked nutrition questions and their own answers to them. We then asked the same questions to ChatGPT and sent both sets of answers to other dieticians (N = 18) or nutritionists and experts in the domain of each question (N = 9) to be graded based on scientific correctness, actionability, and comprehensibility. The grades were also averaged to give an overall score, and group means of the answers to each question were compared using permutation tests.The overall grades for ChatGPT were higher than those from the dieticians for the overall scores in five of the eight questions we received. ChatGPT also had higher grades on five occasions for scientific correctness, four for actionability, and five for comprehensibility. In contrast, none of the answers from the dieticians had a higher average score than ChatGPT for any of the questions, both overall and for each of the grading components.ResultsThe overall grades for ChatGPT were higher than those from the dieticians for the overall scores in five of the eight questions we received. ChatGPT also had higher grades on five occasions for scientific correctness, four for actionability, and five for comprehensibility. In contrast, none of the answers from the dieticians had a higher average score than ChatGPT for any of the questions, both overall and for each of the grading components.Our results suggest that ChatGPT can be used to answer nutrition questions that are frequently asked to dieticians and provide encouraging support for the role of chatbots in offering nutrition support.ConclusionsOur results suggest that ChatGPT can be used to answer nutrition questions that are frequently asked to dieticians and provide encouraging support for the role of chatbots in offering nutrition support. More people than ever seek nutrition information from online sources. The chatbot ChatGPT has seen staggering popularity since its inception and may become a resource for information in nutrition. However, the adequacy of ChatGPT to answer questions in the field of nutrition has not been investigated. Thus, the aim of this research was to investigate the competency of ChatGPT in answering common nutrition questions. Dieticians were asked to provide their most commonly asked nutrition questions and their own answers to them. We then asked the same questions to ChatGPT and sent both sets of answers to other dieticians ( = 18) or nutritionists and experts in the domain of each question ( = 9) to be graded based on scientific correctness, actionability, and comprehensibility. The grades were also averaged to give an overall score, and group means of the answers to each question were compared using permutation tests. The overall grades for ChatGPT were higher than those from the dieticians for the overall scores in five of the eight questions we received. ChatGPT also had higher grades on five occasions for scientific correctness, four for actionability, and five for comprehensibility. In contrast, none of the answers from the dieticians had a higher average score than ChatGPT for any of the questions, both overall and for each of the grading components. Our results suggest that ChatGPT can be used to answer nutrition questions that are frequently asked to dieticians and provide encouraging support for the role of chatbots in offering nutrition support. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Kirk, Daniel van Eijnatten, Elise Camps, Guido |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Daniel orcidid: 0000-0001-7738-7686 surname: Kirk fullname: Kirk, Daniel organization: Division of Human Nutrition and HealthWageningen University & ResearchHelixStippeneng 4Wageningen 6708 WENetherlandswur.nl – sequence: 2 givenname: Elise orcidid: 0000-0002-2591-0583 surname: van Eijnatten fullname: van Eijnatten, Elise organization: Division of Human Nutrition and HealthWageningen University & ResearchHelixStippeneng 4Wageningen 6708 WENetherlandswur.nl – sequence: 3 givenname: Guido orcidid: 0000-0002-3136-8671 surname: Camps fullname: Camps, Guido organization: Division of Human Nutrition and HealthWageningen University & ResearchHelixStippeneng 4Wageningen 6708 WENetherlandswur.nl |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38025546$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kl1rFDEUhgep2Fp757UMCCLotvmcZC6XVdtC8QP2wruQyZx0s8wk22SGxX9vprtdbFGTi5yE531zTnJeFkc-eCiK1xidY8z5BUGEXnDOZCXZs-KEoBrNkKDk6BATdlycpbRG0xB5L18Ux1QiklXVSfFzEfqNji4FXwZbzn3aQkxlA8MWwJeLlR4uvy9L7dvyauy1Lz85GJxx2qdyCGVW91n5dRyiG1yOfoyQpiC9Kp5b3SU426-nxfLL5-Xianbz7fJ6Mb-ZGc7FMNNGVJgLAww3lUVaGmyJsIBbJBugpjLGWC0ZJ8hoRAUDaCyrocG8tQbT0-J6Z9sGvVab6Hodf6mgnbo_CPFW6ZgT7kBB3VbZA4NsGQOjawkN1bQmuMGGIMhe73demxjupjpU75KBrtMewpgUkTUXiEtGM_r2CboOY_S50InCnNYyYwfqVuf7nbdhiNpMpmouBKVCcjZR53-h8myhdyb_t3X5_JHg3R-CFehuWKXQjffv_hh8s89ybHpoD8_z8P0ZIDvAxJBSBKuMG_Tkk1NwncJITW2mpjZT-zbLoo9PRA--_8A_7PCV863euv_TvwER_dv7 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2024_105663 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nutres_2024_11_005 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_85003_w crossref_primary_10_1111_jhn_70033 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nutres_2024_07_002 crossref_primary_10_3390_informatics12010009 crossref_primary_10_3390_su17052113 crossref_primary_10_48070_erciyesakademi_1586710 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14051747 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu16040469 crossref_primary_10_20960_nh_05692 |
Cites_doi | 10.2196/jmir.5729 10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100105 10.3390/nu12030750 10.1016/j.jand.2023.08.001 10.1186/s12966-021-01224-6 10.3389/fnut.2022.870775 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112076 10.2196/12887 10.1007/978-3-030-60816-3_3 10.1007/s10439-023-03227-9 10.1145/3491102.3501886 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2858319/v1 10.1017/s0007114516001355 10.1080/10410236.2011.567449 10.1515/icom-2022-0042 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104365 10.3390/jcm8091489 10.1177/1049732305285972 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.007 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.005 10.2196/43227 10.1093/epirev/mxm001 10.2196/jmir.4548 10.1093/advances/nmac103 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2023 Daniel Kirk et al. COPYRIGHT 2023 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Copyright © 2023 Daniel Kirk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2023 Daniel Kirk et al. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2023 Daniel Kirk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
DBID | RHU RHW RHX AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 4U- 7QP 7RQ 7TK 7XB 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ GUQSH M2O MBDVC PADUT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI Q9U U9A 7X8 DOA |
DOI | 10.1155/2023/5548684 |
DatabaseName | Hindawi Publishing Complete Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals Hindawi Publishing Open Access CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) University Readers Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Career & Technical Education Database Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Research Library Research Library Research Library (Corporate) Research Library China ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database University Readers Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College Research Library (Alumni Edition) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Central ProQuest Career and Technical Education ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (New) Research Library China ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) Career and Technical Education (Alumni Edition) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic PubMed CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: RHX name: Hindawi Publishing Open Access url: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 2090-0732 |
Editor | Gumpricht, Eric |
Editor_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Eric surname: Gumpricht fullname: Gumpricht, Eric |
EndPage | 9 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_e9d6ca01e8d44eca98eb3a3921b1c20e A773378544 38025546 10_1155_2023_5548684 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United Kingdom Netherlands |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom – name: Netherlands |
GroupedDBID | 188 3V. 4.4 53G 5VS 7RQ 8G5 A8Z AAFWJ AAJEY ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACPRK ADBBV ADRAZ AFKRA AFPKN AINHJ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS AZQEC BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ CCPQU DIK DWQXO E3Z EBS ESX F5P FRJ GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GUQSH GX1 HYE IAO ICU ICW IEA IHR IHW INH INR ITC KQ8 M2O M48 M~E O5R OK1 PADUT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC RHU RHW RHX RNS RPM TR2 TUS 0R~ 24P AAHBH AAYXX ACCMX ACUHS CITATION H13 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT 2UF C1A CEFSP CNMHZ EJD IL9 NPM O5S UZ5 PMFND 4U- 7QP 7TK 7XB 8FK AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY MBDVC PKEHL PQEST PQUKI Q9U U9A 7X8 PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-ac76157ce41b6f0a8c1f27fe1d08be3c6cccfa84520ca0374eebf49eb15dfc13 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2090-0724 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:33:59 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 11:49:11 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 20:53:05 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:03:11 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:05:02 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:26:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:54:13 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:30:59 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:34 EDT 2025 Sun Jun 02 19:22:49 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Language | English |
License | This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Copyright © 2023 Daniel Kirk et al. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c557t-ac76157ce41b6f0a8c1f27fe1d08be3c6cccfa84520ca0374eebf49eb15dfc13 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-7738-7686 0000-0002-2591-0583 0000-0002-3136-8671 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/e9d6ca01e8d44eca98eb3a3921b1c20e |
PMID | 38025546 |
PQID | 2891539884 |
PQPubID | 2037500 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e9d6ca01e8d44eca98eb3a3921b1c20e proquest_miscellaneous_2895705843 proquest_journals_2891539884 gale_infotracmisc_A773378544 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A773378544 gale_healthsolutions_A773378544 pubmed_primary_38025546 crossref_citationtrail_10_1155_2023_5548684 crossref_primary_10_1155_2023_5548684 hindawi_primary_10_1155_2023_5548684 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-11-07 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-11-07 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2023 text: 2023-11-07 day: 07 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: New York |
PublicationTitle | Journal of nutrition and metabolism |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Nutr Metab |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Hindawi John Wiley & Sons, Inc Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: Hindawi – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: Wiley |
References | 22 23 24 25 26 28 29 10 11 12 13 D. Kirk (21) 2023 14 15 16 R Core Team (20) 2022 P. Thongyoo (17) 2020 18 19 1 2 3 5 K. Hu (4) 2023 6 OpenAI (27) 2023 7 8 9 |
References_xml | – ident: 2 doi: 10.2196/jmir.5729 – ident: 28 doi: 10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100105 – ident: 3 doi: 10.3390/nu12030750 – volume-title: ChatGPT Sets Record for Fastest-Growing User Base- Analyst Note year: 2023 ident: 4 – ident: 9 doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2023.08.001 – ident: 15 doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01224-6 – ident: 8 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.870775 – ident: 12 doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112076 – ident: 24 doi: 10.2196/12887 – volume-title: A Personalized Food Recommendation Chatbot System for Diabetes Patients year: 2020 ident: 17 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-60816-3_3 – year: 2023 ident: 27 article-title: ChatGPT (June 5th version) [Large language model] – ident: 11 doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03227-9 – ident: 16 doi: 10.1145/3491102.3501886 – ident: 10 doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2858319/v1 – ident: 1 doi: 10.1017/s0007114516001355 – ident: 25 doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.567449 – ident: 7 doi: 10.1515/icom-2022-0042 – ident: 13 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104365 – volume-title: The Capabilities of Chat GPT's at Answering Common Nutrition Questions year: 2023 ident: 21 – ident: 18 doi: 10.3390/jcm8091489 – ident: 29 doi: 10.1177/1049732305285972 – ident: 23 doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838 – ident: 19 doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.007 – ident: 26 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.005 – volume-title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing year: 2022 ident: 20 – ident: 6 doi: 10.2196/43227 – ident: 22 doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxm001 – ident: 5 doi: 10.2196/jmir.4548 – ident: 14 doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac103 |
SSID | ssj0000070728 |
Score | 2.4139264 |
Snippet | Background. More people than ever seek nutrition information from online sources. The chatbot ChatGPT has seen staggering popularity since its inception and... More people than ever seek nutrition information from online sources. The chatbot ChatGPT has seen staggering popularity since its inception and may become a... |
SourceID | doaj proquest gale pubmed crossref hindawi |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | Analysis Artificial intelligence Carbohydrates Chatbots Chronic illnesses Computational linguistics Internet Language processing Natural language interfaces Natural language processing Nutrition research Search engines Weight control |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3daxQxEA9SEHwRtX6cnhqh6oMszW4-9_E8rUWw-HDCvYUkm9BC3RNvi_jfO5PNLb2H0hdfN7MkO5nMzC87H4QcNWNREV21wvhKOMOrlnVNBfqYqa5OUuXfBd_O1OkP8XUt19dafWFM2FgeeGTccWw7FRyro-mEiMG1BuCfA6te-zo0LKL2BZt3DUyNjq9mujG7SHcpEeTzY7CdRhmxZ4Nyqf5JId89Ryj85-JmhzMbnpMH5H7xGOliXOlDcif2j8jhoge0_PMvfUdzDGe-HD8k6-XUVpBuEl30W-yBRkswFl2eu-HL9xV1fUfz7T39dIFJjCAiWzpsKGaLwJtnuwr9NF-HomA-JquTz6vlaVV6J1RBSj1ULmjwVXSIovYqMWdCnRqdYt0x4yMPKoSQnBGyYcBdrkWMPokWNLfsUqj5E3LQb_r4jFDPOYCONjIRsXF667XukhfceMaNU2lGPuyYaUOpK47tLS5txhdSWmS9LayfkbcT9a-xnsYNdB9xXyYarIKdH4Bs2CIb9jbZmJHXuKt2TCmdzrJdaM25NlLANO8zBZ5mWHRwJSkBPh3rYu1Rzvco4RSGveGjIjm3fNZ8J1a2KIutBcwLdqc1OPxmGsYJMACuj5urTCM1A2-Rz8jTURynibhBYCjU8__BsxfkHi44p1vqOTkYfl_Fl-B3Df5VPmL_AO88JrU priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Hindawi Publishing Open Access dbid: RHX link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3daxQxEA-2IPgiav24etoIVR9kMbtJNtnH89p6CBYfTri3kGQTWqh70tsi_vfOZHMLp5T6truZJV8zmZkk8xtCjqsBVEQVjdCuEFbzomFtVcB6zOq2jLJOxwVfz-vFd_FlJVcZJGnz7xE-aDt0z_lH0Hq61mKP7AGDoVO-WI1bKQmyJmVRrVjDCngW2yvuf_2-o3wSRv-4Et-_QB_41-XtlmbSOGePyMNsKtLZMLePyb3QPSEHsw7c5B-_6TuaLm-mXfEDspqP-QTpOtJZt8HkZzTfwqLzC9t__raktmtp2ranJ5cYvQi8saH9mmKYCPx5voXmp2kfFDnyKVmenS7niyInTSi8lKovrFdgpCgfROnqyKz2ZaxUDGXLtAvc1977aLWQFfMWwWdCcFE0sGTLNvqSPyP73boLLwh1nIO30QQmAmZMb5xSbXSCa8e4tnWckA_bwTQ-A4pjXosrkxwLKQ0OvclDPyFvR-qfA5DGLXSfcF5GGoS_Th-AJUyWJhOatobWl0G3QgRvGx0ct2Dqla70FQsTcoSzaoZY0lGIzUwpzpWWAqp5nyhQjKHR3uZoBOg6AmLtUE53KEH8_E7xceacO7o13bKVyavExoCzCwqn0Vj8ZizGCvDmWxfWN4lGKgZmIp-Q5wM7jhVxjR6hqA__rw0vyQN8TZGUakr2--ub8ApMqt69TgL1B9PXFLY priority: 102 providerName: Hindawi Publishing – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3db9QwDI9gExIvCBgfhQOCNOABVUubpEmf0O3YmJA4TeiQ7q1K0nSbBO3YdUL899hpWnQPg7fq6mvSxHZs1_6ZkP18ABVRaSm0TYXRPC1Znaegj1lRZ40swueCL8vi5Jv4vJbrGHDbxLTKUScGRV13DmPkB-AYgHCWWosPlz9T7BqFX1djC43bZBdUsAbna_fwaHn6dYqyBDSb0GA1ZyVL4VqM2e9SouPPD-A81YUWW-dSgO-flPSdc3SPf13cbISGw-j4PrkXrUg6H7b9Abnl24dkb96CB_3jN31LQ15nCJjvkfViajVIu4bO2w32RaMxQYsuzk3_6XRFTVvTENGnHy-wsBHYZkP7jmIFCfxzOaL20xAiRWZ9RFbHR6vFSRr7KaROStWnximwX5TzIrNFw4x2WZOrxmc109ZzVzjnGqOFzJkziEvjvW1ECdpc1o3L-GOy03atf0qo5RwckdIz4bGZemmVqhsruLaMa1M0CXk_LmblItY4trz4XgWfQ8oKl76KS5-QNxP15YCxcQPdIe7LRIPI2OGH7uqsioJW-bIuYPaZ17UQ3plSe8sNWIGZzVzOfEJe4a5WQ5npJN_VXCnOlZYChnkXKFDCYdLOxEIFeHXEytqinG1RgmS6rdv7kXP-81qzka2qqEA21V92T8jr6TYOgElxre-uA41UDCxInpAnAztOA3GNzqIonv374c_JXZxKKK5UM7LTX137F2Bl9fZlFKU_8ysgag priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Comparison of Answers between ChatGPT and Human Dieticians to Common Nutrition Questions |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5548684 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38025546 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2891539884 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2895705843 https://doaj.org/article/e9d6ca01e8d44eca98eb3a3921b1c20e |
Volume | 2023 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3db9MwELfGJtBeEDA-CqUYacADynBiO3YeEOrKtgpp1TR1Ut8i23HYpJFC2wn233PnfIgiKl6iKL7EX3e-3zm-O0L2kzqoiIoyoW0kjOZRxookgvWYpUVcyjT8LjidpOML8WUmZ1ukzTbaDODyn6Yd5pO6WFwf_Ppx-wkE_mMQeCnRfucfQC3qVIs7ZAd0kkIRPW2Afg2EFVMh0WrCMhbBvWhPwf_1gV1yj2sE2giJ_1BVIaJ_t27fvUSL-efVZlwa9NPxA3K_AZZ0WHPCQ7Llq0dkb1iBUf3tlr6l4ahn2EPfI7NRl32Qzks6rJaYKo02Z7bo6NKsTs6m1FQFDZv89PMV-joCJy3pak7RqQTenLSB_GnYNUX-fUymx0fT0ThqUixETkq1ioxTAGmU8yK2acmMdnGZqNLHBdPWc5c650qjhUyYMxiqxntbigwWeFmULuZPyHY1r_wzQi3nYJtkngmP-dUzq1RRWsG1ZVybtOyR9-1g5q4JP45ZMK7zYIZImeMs5M0s9Mibjvp7HXZjA90hzktHg8Gyw4P54mveyF7usyKF1sdeF0J4ZzLtLTcADGMbu4T5HnmFs5rXnqedyOdDpThXWgqo5l2gQDaERjvT-C5A1zF81hplf40ShNWtFe83nPOfbvVbtspbkcjBNAb1lGksft0VYwV4Tq7y85tAIxUDUMl75GnNjl1FLVs_31jyguxiK4KrpeqT7dXixr8EzLWyA7JzeDQ5Ox-EPQu4nsziQRAxuJ6PZ78BnUYlFg |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9MwELdGJwQvCBiMQmFG2uABRXNiO3EeEOq6jY5t1YSK1Dcrdpxt0kjG2mnah-I7cuf8QX0YPO0tSi6xY9-d786--xGyGdVFRZIgFcoEIlM8SFkeBaCPWZyHhYz9dsHxJB7_EN9mcrZCfre5MHisstWJXlHnlcUY-TY4BiCcqVLiy-WvAFGjcHe1hdCo2eLQ3d6Ayzb_fLAL87sVRft709E4aFAFAitlsggyC567TKwToYkLlikbFlFSuDBnyjhuY2ttkSkhI2YzrM7inClECjpN5oUNOXz2AVkVHDyZHlnd2ZucfO-COr54jsdzjVjKArgW7WF7KTHOwLdh-VaxEkvLoEcL6NaEh2fojd-c323z-rVv_yl50hitdFhz2TOy4srnZG1YgsP-85Z-oP4YqY_Pr5HZqEM2pFVBh-UcYdhocx6Mjs6yxdeTKc3KnPoNBLp7jnmUwKVzuqgoJqzAm5MWJID6iCzKxgsyvY-Bfkl6ZVW6V4QazsHvSR0TDrHbU5MkeWEEV4ZxlcVFn3xqB1PbprQ5ImxcaO_iSKlx6HUz9H2y1VFf1iU97qDbwXnpaLAQt79RXZ3qRq61S_MYeh86lQvhbJYqZ3gGRmdoQhsx1ycbOKu6zmrt1IkeJgnniZICmvnoKVChQKdt1uRFwK9jaa4lysESJSgCu_R4s-Gc__zWoGUr3eiruf4rXX3yvnuMDeAZvNJV155GJgwMVt4n6zU7dg1xhb6piF__--Mb5NF4enykjw4mh2_IY-yWz-tMBqS3uLp2b8HAW5h3jVhRou9ZkP8AbldfKQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9MwELdGJxAvCBiMQmFG2uABRXViO3YeEOralY1BVaEh9c1KHIdNgmSsnaZ9NL4dd84f1IfB096i5BI79t35zr67HyG7UV1URAWJ0FkgUs2DhOVRAPqYxXlYyNgfF3yZxYffxKeFXGyQ320uDIZVtjrRK-q8srhHPgTHAIQz0VoMiyYsYj6Zfjj_FSCCFJ60tnAaNYscu-srcN-W748mMNd7UTQ9OBkfBg3CQGClVKsgteDFS2WdCLO4YKm2YRGpwoU505njNrbWFqkWMmI2xUotzmWFSEC_ybywIYfP3iGbCpwi1iOb-wez-ddug8cX0vHYrhFLWADXog28lxL3HPgQlnIda7G2JHrkgG59uHuKnvnV2c32r18Hpw_Jg8aApaOa4x6RDVc-JlujEpz3n9f0DfUhpX6vfossxh3KIa0KOiqXCMlGm9gwOj5NVx_nJzQtc-oPE-jkDHMqgWOXdFVRTF6BN2ctYAD1u7MoJ0_IyW0M9FPSK6vSPSM04xx8oMQx4RDHPcmUyotMcJ0xrtO46JN37WAa25Q5R7SNH8a7O1IaHHrTDH2f7HXU53V5jxvo9nFeOhosyu1vVBffTSPjxiV5DL0Pnc6FcDZNtMt4CgZomIU2Yq5PdnBWTZ3h2qkWM1KKc6WlgGbeegpULtBpmzY5EvDrWKZrjXKwRglKwa493m045z-_NWjZyjS6a2n-SlqfvO4eYwMYj1e66tLTSMXAeOV9sl2zY9cQ1-inivj5vz--Q-6BAJvPR7PjF-Q-9sqneKoB6a0uLt1LsPVW2atGqigxtyzHfwD8TWNe |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Answers+between+ChatGPT+and+Human+Dieticians+to+Common+Nutrition+Questions&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+nutrition+and+metabolism&rft.au=Kirk%2C+Daniel&rft.au=van+Eijnatten%2C+Elise&rft.au=Camps%2C+Guido&rft.date=2023-11-07&rft.issn=2090-0724&rft.volume=2023&rft.spage=5548684&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155%2F2023%2F5548684&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F38025546&rft.externalDocID=38025546 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2090-0724&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2090-0724&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2090-0724&client=summon |