Are Human Learners Capable of Learning Arbitrary Language Structures

• Published in: Brain sciences Vol. 13; no. 2; p. 181
• Main Author: Lin, Yu-Leng
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 21.01.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: artificial grammar learning; Constraints; Experiments; Generative grammar; Grammar; harmony; Laboratories; Language; Language acquisition; Learning; Naturalness; phonetic naturalness; Phonetics; Phonology; Sonority; United Kingdom; Taiwan; harmony; phonetic naturalness; artificial grammar learning; phonology
• DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13020181
• ISSN: 2076-3425

The artificial grammar learning paradigm is a classic method of investigating the influence of universal constraints on shaping learning biases on language acquisition. While this method has been used extensively by linguists to test theoretical claims in generative grammar, one of the most prevalent frameworks in language acquisition, several studies have questioned whether artificial grammar learning reflects language acquisition enough to allow us to use it to draw inferences about the validity of universal constraints, particularly those arising from phonetic naturalness. The current study tests whether artificial grammar learning shows the effect of one robust phonetic naturalness constraint: the restriction on nasal harmony patterns arising from the sonority hierarchy. Nasal harmony is of particular interest because it is one of the few types of harmony that occurs between consonants and vowels, which is an under-researched topic. The results, contrary to the skeptical concerns, showed that participants (n = 120) could learn an artificial grammar involving a natural pattern, but could not learn one corresponding to an arbitrary/phonetically unmotivated pattern in the same way or to the same degree. This study contributes epistemic support to the large body of work using artificial grammar experiments to test phonological operations.