Combined ASRGL1 and p53 immunohistochemistry as an independent predictor of survival in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma
In clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based markers as prognostic tools is generally not recommended and a systematic analysis of their utility as a panel is lacking. We evaluated whether an immunohis...
Saved in:
Published in | Gynecologic oncology Vol. 149; no. 1; pp. 173 - 180 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.04.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | In clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based markers as prognostic tools is generally not recommended and a systematic analysis of their utility as a panel is lacking. We evaluated whether an immunohistochemical marker panel could reliably assess endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) outcome independent of clinicopathological information.
A cohort of 306 EEC specimens was profiled using tissue microarray (TMA). Cost- and time-efficient immunohistochemical analysis of well-established tissue biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, MLH1 and p53) and two new biomarkers (L1CAM and ASRGL1) was carried out. Statistical modelling with embedded variable selection was applied on the staining results to identify minimal prognostic panels with maximal prognostic accuracy without compromising generalizability.
A panel including p53 and ASRGL1 immunohistochemistry was identified as the most accurate predictor of relapse-free and disease-specific survival. Within this panel, patients were allocated into high- (5.9%), intermediate- (29.5%) and low- (64.6%) risk groups where high-risk patients had a 30-fold risk (P<0.001) of dying of EEC compared to the low-risk group.
P53 and ASRGL1 immunoprofiling stratifies EEC patients into three risk groups with significantly different outcomes. This simple and easily applicable panel could provide a useful tool in EEC risk stratification and guiding the allocation of treatment modalities.
•ASRGL1 is a promising biomarker in endometrioid endometrial cancer.•An immunopanel consisting of p53 and ASRGL1 is a useful tool in EEC risk assessment.•Different EEC subgroups can be characterized using sophisticated statistical methods. |
---|---|
AbstractList | OBJECTIVEIn clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based markers as prognostic tools is generally not recommended and a systematic analysis of their utility as a panel is lacking. We evaluated whether an immunohistochemical marker panel could reliably assess endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) outcome independent of clinicopathological information.METHODSA cohort of 306 EEC specimens was profiled using tissue microarray (TMA). Cost- and time-efficient immunohistochemical analysis of well-established tissue biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, MLH1 and p53) and two new biomarkers (L1CAM and ASRGL1) was carried out. Statistical modelling with embedded variable selection was applied on the staining results to identify minimal prognostic panels with maximal prognostic accuracy without compromising generalizability.RESULTSA panel including p53 and ASRGL1 immunohistochemistry was identified as the most accurate predictor of relapse-free and disease-specific survival. Within this panel, patients were allocated into high- (5.9%), intermediate- (29.5%) and low- (64.6%) risk groups where high-risk patients had a 30-fold risk (P<0.001) of dying of EEC compared to the low-risk group.CONCLUSIONSP53 and ASRGL1 immunoprofiling stratifies EEC patients into three risk groups with significantly different outcomes. This simple and easily applicable panel could provide a useful tool in EEC risk stratification and guiding the allocation of treatment modalities. Objective: In clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based markers as prognostic tools is generally not recommended and a systematic analysis of their utility as a panel is lacking. We evaluated whether an immunohistochemical marker panel could reliably assess endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) outcome independent of clinicopathological information. Methods: A cohort of 306 EEC specimens was profiled using tissue microarray (TMA). Cost- and time-efficient immunohistochemical analysis of well-established tissue biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, MLH1 and p53) and two new biomarkers (L1CAM and ASRGL1) was carried out. Statistical modelling with embedded variable selection was applied on the staining results to identify minimal prognostic panels with maximal prognostic accuracy without compromising generalizability. Results: A panel including p53 and ASRGL1 immunohistochemistry was identified as the most accurate predictor of relapse-free and disease-specific survival. Within this panel, patients were allocated into high- (5.9%), intermediate- (29.5%) and low- (64.6%) risk groups where high-risk patients had a 30-fold risk (P < 0.001) of dying of EEC compared to the low-risk group. Conclusions: P53 and ASRGL1 immunoprofiling stratifies EEC patients into three risk groups with significantly different outcomes. This simple and easily applicable panel could provide a useful tool in EEC risk stratification and guiding the allocation of treatment modalities. Objective. In clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based markers as prognostic tools is generally not recommended and a systematic analysis of their utility as a panel is lacking. We evaluated whether an immunohistochemical marker panel could reliably assess endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) outcome independent of clinicopathological information. Methods. A cohort of 306 EEC specimens was profiled using tissue microarray (TMA). Cost- and time-efficient immunohistochemical analysis of well-established tissue biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, MLH1 and p53) and two new biomarkers (L1CAM and ASRGL1) was carried out. Statistical modelling with embedded variable selection was applied on the staining results to identify minimal prognostic panels with maximal prognostic accuracy without compromising generalizability. Results. A panel including p53 and ASRGL1 immunohistochemistry was identified as the most accurate predictor of relapse-free and disease-specific survival. Within this panel, patients were allocated into high- (5.9%), intermediate- (295%) and low- (64.6%) risk groups where high-risk patients had a 30-fold risk (P < 0.001) of dying of EEC compared to the low-risk group. Conclusions. P53 and ASRGL1 immunoprofiling stratifies EEC patients into three risk groups with significantly different outcomes. This simple and easily applicable panel could provide a useful tool in EEC risk stratification and guiding the allocation of treatment modalities. In clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based markers as prognostic tools is generally not recommended and a systematic analysis of their utility as a panel is lacking. We evaluated whether an immunohistochemical marker panel could reliably assess endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) outcome independent of clinicopathological information. A cohort of 306 EEC specimens was profiled using tissue microarray (TMA). Cost- and time-efficient immunohistochemical analysis of well-established tissue biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, MLH1 and p53) and two new biomarkers (L1CAM and ASRGL1) was carried out. Statistical modelling with embedded variable selection was applied on the staining results to identify minimal prognostic panels with maximal prognostic accuracy without compromising generalizability. A panel including p53 and ASRGL1 immunohistochemistry was identified as the most accurate predictor of relapse-free and disease-specific survival. Within this panel, patients were allocated into high- (5.9%), intermediate- (29.5%) and low- (64.6%) risk groups where high-risk patients had a 30-fold risk (P<0.001) of dying of EEC compared to the low-risk group. P53 and ASRGL1 immunoprofiling stratifies EEC patients into three risk groups with significantly different outcomes. This simple and easily applicable panel could provide a useful tool in EEC risk stratification and guiding the allocation of treatment modalities. Objective: In clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based markers as prognostic tools is generally not recommended and a systematic analysis of their utility as a panel is lacking. We evaluated whether an immunohistochemical marker panel could reliably assess endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) outcome independent of clinicopathological information. Methods: A cohort of 306 EEC specimens was profiled using tissue microarray (TMA). Cost- and time-efficient immunohistochemical analysis of well-established tissue biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, MLH1 and p53) and two new biomarkers (L1CAM and ASRGL1) was carried out. Statistical modelling with embedded variable selection was applied on the staining results to identify minimal prognostic panels with maximal prognostic accuracy without compromising generalizability. Results: A panel including p53 and ASRGL1 immunohistochemistry was identified as the most accurate predictor of relapse-free and disease-specific survival. Within this panel, patients were allocated into high- (5.9%), intermediate- (29.5%) and low- (64.6%) risk groups where high-risk patients had a 30-fold risk (P < 0.001) of dying of EEC compared to the low-risk group. Conclusions: P53 and ASRGL1 immunoprofiling stratifies EEC patients into three risk groups with significantly different outcomes. This simple and easily applicable panel could provide a useful tool in EEC risk stratification and guiding the allocation of treatment modalities. In clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based markers as prognostic tools is generally not recommended and a systematic analysis of their utility as a panel is lacking. We evaluated whether an immunohistochemical marker panel could reliably assess endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) outcome independent of clinicopathological information. A cohort of 306 EEC specimens was profiled using tissue microarray (TMA). Cost- and time-efficient immunohistochemical analysis of well-established tissue biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, MLH1 and p53) and two new biomarkers (L1CAM and ASRGL1) was carried out. Statistical modelling with embedded variable selection was applied on the staining results to identify minimal prognostic panels with maximal prognostic accuracy without compromising generalizability. A panel including p53 and ASRGL1 immunohistochemistry was identified as the most accurate predictor of relapse-free and disease-specific survival. Within this panel, patients were allocated into high- (5.9%), intermediate- (29.5%) and low- (64.6%) risk groups where high-risk patients had a 30-fold risk (P<0.001) of dying of EEC compared to the low-risk group. P53 and ASRGL1 immunoprofiling stratifies EEC patients into three risk groups with significantly different outcomes. This simple and easily applicable panel could provide a useful tool in EEC risk stratification and guiding the allocation of treatment modalities. •ASRGL1 is a promising biomarker in endometrioid endometrial cancer.•An immunopanel consisting of p53 and ASRGL1 is a useful tool in EEC risk assessment.•Different EEC subgroups can be characterized using sophisticated statistical methods. |
Author | Mardinoglu, Adil Huvila, Jutta Edqvist, Per-Henrik Grénman, Seija Laajala, Teemu D. Aittokallio, Tero Carpén, Olli Pontén, Fredrik Talve, Lauri Auranen, Annika |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jutta orcidid: 0000-0002-2685-0877 surname: Huvila fullname: Huvila, Jutta email: jutta.huvila@utu.fi organization: Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Turku University Hospital, PL 52, 20520 Turku, Finland – sequence: 2 givenname: Teemu D. surname: Laajala fullname: Laajala, Teemu D. organization: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, PL20, 00014 Helsinki, Finland – sequence: 3 givenname: Per-Henrik surname: Edqvist fullname: Edqvist, Per-Henrik organization: Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, BOX256, 75105 Uppsala, Sweden – sequence: 4 givenname: Adil surname: Mardinoglu fullname: Mardinoglu, Adil organization: Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden – sequence: 5 givenname: Lauri surname: Talve fullname: Talve, Lauri organization: Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Turku University Hospital, PL 52, 20520 Turku, Finland – sequence: 6 givenname: Fredrik surname: Pontén fullname: Pontén, Fredrik organization: Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, BOX256, 75105 Uppsala, Sweden – sequence: 7 givenname: Seija surname: Grénman fullname: Grénman, Seija organization: Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Turku, Turku University Hospital, PL52, 20520 Turku, Finland – sequence: 8 givenname: Olli orcidid: 0000-0002-7847-5706 surname: Carpén fullname: Carpén, Olli organization: Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Turku University Hospital, PL 52, 20520 Turku, Finland – sequence: 9 givenname: Tero surname: Aittokallio fullname: Aittokallio, Tero organization: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, PL20, 00014 Helsinki, Finland – sequence: 10 givenname: Annika surname: Auranen fullname: Auranen, Annika organization: Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Tampere, Tampere University Hospital, PL2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29486992$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-227355$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-352701$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index https://research.chalmers.se/publication/501768$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index |
BookMark | eNqFkk2P0zAQhiO0iP2AX4CEcuRAij_ixD5wqAosSJWQWOA68sdk69LEwU6Kyq_HpctyAiTLlmeeeWekeS-LsyEMWBRPKVlQQpuX28Xh9jCEBSNULghb5NiD4oISJapGCnVWXBCiSCWZkOfFZUpbQggnlD0qzpmqZaMUuyh-rEJv_ICuXN58vF7TUg-uHAUvfd_PQ9j4NAW7wT6_8VDqlPOlHxyOmK9hKseIztspxDJ0ZZrj3u_1LhNlzocep-iDd38-OWd1tH4IvX5cPOz0LuGTu_eq-Pz2zafVu2r94fr9armurBBiqrgxRhpJOdKubWsnJNau050jTlhRc0Wxk1Y5R6VRUht0-RBrGmGaVkjBr4qbk276juNsYIy-1_EAQXuImDDPswG70bseY4KEkEtVrTiHzhoFtZY1KEQOhrWsESjrmpis-uKvqq_9lyWEeAvzDFywltCMV__Hv04bYKzl4jj08xM_xvBtxjRBXoHF3U4PGOYELO-W0baueUb5CbUxpBSxuxenBI5OgS38cgocnQKEQY7lqmd3DWbTo7uv-W2NDLw6AZh3s_cYIVmPg837jmgncMH_s8FPrYnVuQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s43032_021_00565_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ebiom_2021_103269 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2021_680070 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcell_2021_670021 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3976482 crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_15403 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pgen_1007810 crossref_primary_10_3892_mco_2018_1680 crossref_primary_10_1089_cbr_2019_2851 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2022_12_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ebiom_2023_104452 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_023_05347_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2024_07_007 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcell_2021_783547 |
Cites_doi | 10.3791/3620 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02514.x 10.1002/cncr.30496 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70591-6 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.008 10.1038/modpathol.2009.153 10.1002/1097-0142(19950101)75:1<81::AID-CNCR2820750114>3.0.CO;2-F 10.1007/s12253-016-0047-8 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.032 10.1038/nature25465 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000212 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.025 10.18637/jss.v033.i01 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.055 10.1038/nature12113 10.1007/s11912-014-0403-3 10.1038/modpathol.2010.91 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.090 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.003 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.09.006 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000801 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31827f576a 10.1038/bjc.2016.235 10.1038/bjc.2015.35 10.1021/bi901397h 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01882.x 10.1097/01.AOG.0000239097.42987.0c 10.1038/bjc.2013.766 10.1016/S0090-8258(02)00094-X 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02139-5 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a47c25 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.05.012 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.007 10.1038/modpathol.2015.147 10.18637/jss.v039.i05 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.07.014 10.1126/science.1260419 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000764 10.1093/jnci/djt144 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.010 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2018 Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2018 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 ADTPV AOWAS D8V DF2 F1S |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic SwePub SwePub Articles SWEPUB Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan SWEPUB Uppsala universitet SWEPUB Chalmers tekniska högskola |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1095-6859 |
EndPage | 180 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_research_chalmers_se_b6594933_fcb9_4a84_9ee3_b27265e8440b oai_DiVA_org_uu_352701 oai_DiVA_org_kth_227355 10_1016_j_ygyno_2018_02_016 29486992 S0090825818301355 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .55 .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29I 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAXUO ABBQC ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABLVK ABMAC ABMZM ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADFGL ADMUD AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AENEX AEVXI AFCTW AFFNX AFKWA AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AHPSJ AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJRQY AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CAG COF CS3 DM4 DU5 EBS EFBJH EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HED HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IH2 IHE J1W K-O KOM L7B LCYCR LG5 M29 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OQ. OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PH~ Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UDS UHS UV1 WUQ X7M XPP Z5R ZGI ZMT ZU3 ZXP ~G- AAXKI AKRWK NPM AAYXX AFJKZ CITATION 7X8 ADTPV AOWAS D8V DF2 F1S |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-3bbb8b813e1f774d58e4dfafd0d5c54391ef8c9dd18b98abedbed0cb65b675853 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 01 22:51:25 EDT 2024 Tue Oct 01 22:46:13 EDT 2024 Tue Oct 01 05:11:28 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 07:22:46 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 17:59:46 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 16 01:01:02 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 02:21:50 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Modelling Endometrial cancer Prognostic ASRGL1 Risk stratification p53 |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c555t-3bbb8b813e1f774d58e4dfafd0d5c54391ef8c9dd18b98abedbed0cb65b675853 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-7847-5706 0000-0002-2685-0877 |
OpenAccessLink | https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/10138/301855/1/1_s2.0_S0090825818301355_main.pdf |
PMID | 29486992 |
PQID | 2009217443 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | swepub_primary_oai_research_chalmers_se_b6594933_fcb9_4a84_9ee3_b27265e8440b swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_uu_352701 swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_kth_227355 proquest_miscellaneous_2009217443 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2018_02_016 pubmed_primary_29486992 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ygyno_2018_02_016 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2018-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2018 text: 2018-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Gynecologic oncology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Gynecol Oncol |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Hussein, Broaddus, Weigelt, Levine, Soslow (bb0205) 2016; 35 Helpman, Kupets, Covens, Saad, Khalifa, Ismiil (bb0160) 2014; 110 Friedman, Hastie, Tibshirani (bb0140) 2010; 33 Zaino, Kurman, Diana, Morrow (bb0120) 1995; 75 Cantor, Stone, Chantranupong, Georgiou (bb0195) 2009; 48 TCGA Research Network. Retrieved 30.5.2017 Uhlén, Fagerberg, Hallström, Lindskog, Oksvold, Mardinoglu (bb0130) 2015; 347 Werner, Trovik, Marcickiewicz, Tingulstad, Staff AC, Engh (bb0175) 2013; 49 Gilks, Oliva, Soslow (bb0185) 2013; 37 Jongen, Briet, de Jong, ten Hoor, Boezen, van der Zee (bb0025) 2009; 112 Simon, Friedman, Hastie, Tibshirani (bb0145) 2011; 39 Köbel, Atenafu, Rambau, Ferguson, Nelson, Ho (bb0030) 2016; 141 Cohn, Frankel, Resnick, Zanagnolo, Copeland, Hampel (bb0050) 2006; 108 Geels, van der Putten, van Tilborg, Lurkin, Zwarthoff, Pijnenborg (bb0090) 2015; 137 Creasman (bb0115) 2009; 105 Knott, Wagenblast, Khan, Kim, Soto, Wagner (bb0200) 2018; 554 Murali, Soslow, Weigelt (bb0015) 2014; 15 Bendifallah, Canlorbe, Collinet, Arsène, Huguet, Coutant (bb0170) 2015; 112 Stefansson, Salvesen, Immervoll, Akslen (bb0055) 2004; 44 Talhouk, Hoang, McConechy, Nakonechny, Leo, Cheng (bb0210) 2016; 143 Dellinger, Smith, Ouyang, Warden, Williams, Han (bb0080) 2016; 141 Nout, Bosse, Creutzberg, Jürgenliemk-Schulz, Jobsen, Lutgens (bb0040) 2012; 126 Geels, Pijnenborg, Gordon, Fogel, Altevogt, Masadah (bb0085) 2016; 22 Kampf, Olsson, Ryberg, Sjostedt, Ponten (bb0125) 2012 Werner, Salvesen (bb0020) 2014; 16 van der Putten, Visser, van de Vijver, Santacana, Bronsert, Bulten (bb0180) 2016; 115 Santin (bb0060) 2003; 88 Talhouk, McConechy, Leung, Yang, Lum, Senz (bb0155) 2017; 123 . O'Mara, Zhao, Spurdle (bb0105) 2016; 6 Folkins, Nevadunsky, Saleemuddin, Jarboe, Muto, Feltmate (bb0165) 2010; 23 Zeimet, Reimer, Huszar, Winterhoff, Puistola, Azim (bb0010) 2013; 105 Edqvist, Huvila, Forsström, Talve, Carpén, Salvesen (bb0095) 2015; 137 Garg, Leitao, Wynveen, Sica, Shia, Shi (bb0035) 2010; 23 Bosse, Nout, Stelloo, Dreef, Nijman, Jürgenliemk-Schulz (bb0065) 2014; 50 Fonnes, Berg, Bredholt, Edqvist, Sortland, Berg (bb0100) 2018; 148 Creutzberg, van Putten, Koper, Lybeert, Jobsen, Wárlám-Rodenhuis (bb0005) 2000; 355 Walker (bb0135) 2006; 49 Jongen, Briet, de Jong, Joppe, ten Hoor, Boezen (bb0045) 2009; 19 Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Kandoth, Schultz, Cherniack, Akbani, Liu (bb0110) 2013; 497 Hoang, Kinloch, Leo, Grondin, Lee, Ewanowich (bb0190) 2017; 41 Pasanen, Tuomi, Isola, Staff S, Bützow, Loukovaara (bb0070) 2016; 26 Van Gool, Stelloo, Nout, Nijman, Edmondson, Church (bb0075) 2016; 29 van der Putten (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0180) 2016; 115 Köbel (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0030) 2016; 141 Helpman (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0160) 2014; 110 Geels (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0090) 2015; 137 O'Mara (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0105) 2016; 6 Murali (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0015) 2014; 15 Zeimet (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0010) 2013; 105 Stefansson (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0055) 2004; 44 Nout (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0040) 2012; 126 Walker (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0135) 2006; 49 Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0110) 2013; 497 Fonnes (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0100) 2018; 148 Werner (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0020) 2014; 16 Folkins (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0165) 2010; 23 Hoang (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0190) 2017; 41 Knott (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0200) 2018; 554 Jongen (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0025) 2009; 112 Bosse (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0065) 2014; 50 Cantor (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0195) 2009; 48 Edqvist (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0095) 2015; 137 Talhouk (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0210) 2016; 143 Talhouk (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0155) 2017; 123 Creasman (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0115) 2009; 105 Bendifallah (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0170) 2015; 112 Santin (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0060) 2003; 88 Friedman (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0140) 2010; 33 Simon (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0145) 2011; 39 Pasanen (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0070) 2016; 26 Dellinger (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0080) 2016; 141 Kampf (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0125) 2012 Uhlén (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0130) 2015; 347 Garg (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0035) 2010; 23 Jongen (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0045) 2009; 19 Werner (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0175) 2013; 49 Gilks (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0185) 2013; 37 Van Gool (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0075) 2016; 29 Cohn (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0050) 2006; 108 Geels (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0085) 2016; 22 Zaino (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0120) 1995; 75 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0150 Hussein (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0205) 2016; 35 Creutzberg (10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0005) 2000; 355 |
References_xml | – volume: 33 start-page: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 22 ident: bb0140 article-title: Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent publication-title: J. Stat. Softw. contributor: fullname: Tibshirani – volume: 37 start-page: 874 year: 2013 end-page: 881 ident: bb0185 article-title: Poor interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of high-grade endometrial carcinoma publication-title: Am. J. Surg. Pathol. contributor: fullname: Soslow – volume: 105 start-page: 1142 year: 2013 end-page: 1150 ident: bb0010 article-title: L1CAM in early-stage type I endometrial cancer: results of a large multicenter evaluation publication-title: J. Natl. Cancer Inst. contributor: fullname: Azim – volume: 141 start-page: 336 year: 2016 end-page: 340 ident: bb0080 article-title: L1CAM is an independent predictor of poor survival in endometrial cancer - an analysis of the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. contributor: fullname: Han – volume: 88 start-page: 263 year: 2003 end-page: 265 ident: bb0060 article-title: HER2/neu overexpression: has the Achilles' heel of uterine serous papillary carcinoma been exposed publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. contributor: fullname: Santin – volume: 141 start-page: 559 year: 2016 end-page: 563 ident: bb0030 article-title: Progesterone receptor expression is associated with longer overall survival within high-grade histotypes of endometrial carcinoma: a Canadian high risk endometrial cancer consortium (CHREC) study publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. contributor: fullname: Ho – volume: 50 start-page: 2602 year: 2014 end-page: 2610 ident: bb0065 article-title: L1 cell adhesion molecule is a strong predictor for distant recurrence and overall survival in early stage endometrial cancer: pooled PORTEC trial results publication-title: Eur. J. Cancer contributor: fullname: Jürgenliemk-Schulz – volume: 23 start-page: 1073 year: 2010 end-page: 1079 ident: bb0165 article-title: Evaluation of vascular space involvement in endometrial adenocarcinomas: laparoscopic vs abdominal hysterectomies publication-title: Mod. Pathol. contributor: fullname: Feltmate – volume: 112 start-page: 793 year: 2015 end-page: 801 ident: bb0170 article-title: Just how accurate are the major risk stratification systems for early-stage endometrial cancer publication-title: Br. J. Cancer contributor: fullname: Coutant – volume: 105 start-page: 109 year: 2009 ident: bb0115 article-title: Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium publication-title: Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. contributor: fullname: Creasman – volume: 35 start-page: 16 year: 2016 end-page: 24 ident: bb0205 article-title: The genomic heterogeneity of FIGO grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma impacts diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. contributor: fullname: Soslow – volume: 23 start-page: 80 year: 2010 end-page: 92 ident: bb0035 article-title: p53 overexpression in morphologically ambiguous endometrial carcinomas correlates with adverse clinical outcomes publication-title: Mod. Pathol. contributor: fullname: Shi – volume: 115 start-page: 716 year: 2016 end-page: 724 ident: bb0180 article-title: L1CAM expression in endometrial carcinomas: an ENITEC collaboration study publication-title: Br. J. Cancer contributor: fullname: Bulten – volume: 137 start-page: 245 year: 2015 end-page: 251 ident: bb0090 article-title: Immunohistochemical and genetic profiles of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma arising from atrophic endometrium publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. contributor: fullname: Pijnenborg – volume: 22 start-page: 863 year: 2016 end-page: 868 ident: bb0085 article-title: L1CAM expression is related to non-Endometrioid histology, and prognostic for poor outcome in Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma publication-title: Pathol. Oncol. Res. contributor: fullname: Masadah – volume: 497 start-page: 67 year: 2013 end-page: 73 ident: bb0110 article-title: Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma publication-title: Nature contributor: fullname: Liu – volume: 6 year: 2016 ident: bb0105 article-title: Meta-analysis of gene expression studies in endometrial cancer identifies gene expression profiles associated with aggressive disease and patient outcome publication-title: Sci. Rep. contributor: fullname: Spurdle – volume: 123 start-page: 802 year: 2017 end-page: 813 ident: bb0155 article-title: Confirmation of ProMisE: a simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer publication-title: Cancer contributor: fullname: Senz – volume: 19 start-page: 670 year: 2009 end-page: 676 ident: bb0045 article-title: Aromatase, cyclooxygenase 2, HER-2/neu, and p53 as prognostic factors in endometrioid endometrial cancer publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer contributor: fullname: Boezen – volume: 143 start-page: 46 year: 2016 end-page: 53 ident: bb0210 article-title: Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma on diagnostic specimens is highly concordant with final hysterectomy: earlier prognostic information to guide treatment publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. contributor: fullname: Cheng – volume: 347 year: 2015 ident: bb0130 article-title: Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome publication-title: Science contributor: fullname: Mardinoglu – year: 2012 ident: bb0125 article-title: Production of tissue microarrays, immunohistochemistry staining and digitalization within the human protein atlas publication-title: J. Vis. Exp. contributor: fullname: Ponten – volume: 15 start-page: e268 year: 2014 end-page: 78 ident: bb0015 article-title: Classification of endometrial carcinoma: more than two types publication-title: Lancet Oncol. contributor: fullname: Weigelt – volume: 110 start-page: 609 year: 2014 end-page: 615 ident: bb0160 article-title: Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer publication-title: Br. J. Cancer contributor: fullname: Ismiil – volume: 48 start-page: 11026 year: 2009 end-page: 11031 ident: bb0195 article-title: The human asparaginase-like protein 1 hASRGL1 is an Ntn hydrolase with beta-aspartyl peptidase activity publication-title: Biochemistry contributor: fullname: Georgiou – volume: 41 start-page: 245 year: 2017 end-page: 252 ident: bb0190 article-title: Interobserver agreement in endometrial carcinoma histotype diagnosis varies depending on the cancer genome atlas (TCGA)-based molecular subgroup publication-title: Am. J. Surg. Pathol. contributor: fullname: Ewanowich – volume: 26 start-page: 1465 year: 2016 end-page: 1471 ident: bb0070 article-title: L1 cell adhesion molecule as a predictor of disease-specific survival and patterns of relapse in endometrial cancer publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer contributor: fullname: Loukovaara – volume: 355 start-page: 1404 year: 2000 end-page: 1411 ident: bb0005 article-title: Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC study group. Post operative radiation therapy in endometrial carcinoma publication-title: Lancet contributor: fullname: Wárlám-Rodenhuis – volume: 108 start-page: 1208 year: 2006 end-page: 1215 ident: bb0050 article-title: Improved survival with an intact DNA mismatch repair system in endometrial cancer publication-title: Obstet. Gynecol. contributor: fullname: Hampel – volume: 112 start-page: 537 year: 2009 end-page: 542 ident: bb0025 article-title: Expression of estrogen receptor-alpha and -beta and progesterone receptor-A and -B in a large cohort of patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. contributor: fullname: van der Zee – volume: 44 start-page: 472 year: 2004 end-page: 479 ident: bb0055 article-title: Prognostic impact of histological grade and vascular invasion compared with tumour cell proliferation in endometrial carcinoma of endometrioid type publication-title: Histopathology contributor: fullname: Akslen – volume: 148 start-page: 197 year: 2018 end-page: 203 ident: bb0100 article-title: Asparaginase-like protein 1 is an independent prognostic marker in primary endometrial cancer, and is frequently lost in metastatic lesions publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. contributor: fullname: Berg – volume: 554 start-page: 378 year: 2018 end-page: 381 ident: bb0200 article-title: Asparagine bioavailability governs metastasis in a model of breast cancer publication-title: Nature contributor: fullname: Wagner – volume: 137 start-page: 529 year: 2015 end-page: 537 ident: bb0095 article-title: Loss of ASRGL1 expression is an independent biomarker for disease-specific survival in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. contributor: fullname: Salvesen – volume: 49 start-page: 625 year: 2013 end-page: 632 ident: bb0175 article-title: A discordant histological risk classification in preoperative and operative biopsy in endometrial cancer is reflected in metastatic risk and prognosis publication-title: Eur. J. Cancer contributor: fullname: Engh – volume: 29 start-page: 174 year: 2016 end-page: 181 ident: bb0075 article-title: Prognostic significance of L1CAM expression and its association with mutant p53 expression in high-risk endometrial cancer publication-title: Mod. Pathol. contributor: fullname: Church – volume: 39 start-page: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 13 ident: bb0145 article-title: Regularization paths for Cox's proportional hazards model via coordinate descent publication-title: J. Stat. Softw. contributor: fullname: Tibshirani – volume: 75 start-page: 81 year: 1995 end-page: 86 ident: bb0120 article-title: The utility of the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics histologic grading of endometrial adenocarcinoma using a defined nuclear grading system. A gynecologic oncology group study publication-title: Cancer contributor: fullname: Morrow – volume: 49 start-page: 406 year: 2006 end-page: 410 ident: bb0135 article-title: Quantification of immunohistochemistry–issues concerning methods, utility and semiquantitative assessment I publication-title: Histopathology contributor: fullname: Walker – volume: 16 start-page: 403 year: 2014 ident: bb0020 article-title: Current status of molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer publication-title: Curr. Oncol. Rep. contributor: fullname: Salvesen – volume: 126 start-page: 466 year: 2012 end-page: 473 ident: bb0040 article-title: Improved risk assessment of endometrial cancer by combined analysis of MSI, PI3K-AKT, Wnt/β-catenin and P53 pathway activation publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. contributor: fullname: Lutgens – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0125 article-title: Production of tissue microarrays, immunohistochemistry staining and digitalization within the human protein atlas publication-title: J. Vis. Exp. doi: 10.3791/3620 contributor: fullname: Kampf – volume: 49 start-page: 406 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0135 article-title: Quantification of immunohistochemistry–issues concerning methods, utility and semiquantitative assessment I publication-title: Histopathology doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02514.x contributor: fullname: Walker – volume: 123 start-page: 802 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0155 article-title: Confirmation of ProMisE: a simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.30496 contributor: fullname: Talhouk – volume: 15 start-page: e268 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0015 article-title: Classification of endometrial carcinoma: more than two types publication-title: Lancet Oncol. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70591-6 contributor: fullname: Murali – volume: 141 start-page: 559 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0030 article-title: Progesterone receptor expression is associated with longer overall survival within high-grade histotypes of endometrial carcinoma: a Canadian high risk endometrial cancer consortium (CHREC) study publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.008 contributor: fullname: Köbel – volume: 23 start-page: 80 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0035 article-title: p53 overexpression in morphologically ambiguous endometrial carcinomas correlates with adverse clinical outcomes publication-title: Mod. Pathol. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.153 contributor: fullname: Garg – volume: 75 start-page: 81 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0120 article-title: The utility of the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics histologic grading of endometrial adenocarcinoma using a defined nuclear grading system. A gynecologic oncology group study publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950101)75:1<81::AID-CNCR2820750114>3.0.CO;2-F contributor: fullname: Zaino – volume: 22 start-page: 863 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0085 article-title: L1CAM expression is related to non-Endometrioid histology, and prognostic for poor outcome in Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma publication-title: Pathol. Oncol. Res. doi: 10.1007/s12253-016-0047-8 contributor: fullname: Geels – volume: 112 start-page: 537 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0025 article-title: Expression of estrogen receptor-alpha and -beta and progesterone receptor-A and -B in a large cohort of patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.032 contributor: fullname: Jongen – ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0150 – volume: 554 start-page: 378 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0200 article-title: Asparagine bioavailability governs metastasis in a model of breast cancer publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/nature25465 contributor: fullname: Knott – volume: 35 start-page: 16 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0205 article-title: The genomic heterogeneity of FIGO grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma impacts diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000212 contributor: fullname: Hussein – volume: 148 start-page: 197 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0100 article-title: Asparaginase-like protein 1 is an independent prognostic marker in primary endometrial cancer, and is frequently lost in metastatic lesions publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.025 contributor: fullname: Fonnes – volume: 33 start-page: 1 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0140 article-title: Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent publication-title: J. Stat. Softw. doi: 10.18637/jss.v033.i01 contributor: fullname: Friedman – volume: 137 start-page: 529 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0095 article-title: Loss of ASRGL1 expression is an independent biomarker for disease-specific survival in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.055 contributor: fullname: Edqvist – volume: 497 start-page: 67 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0110 article-title: Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/nature12113 contributor: fullname: Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network – volume: 16 start-page: 403 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0020 article-title: Current status of molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer publication-title: Curr. Oncol. Rep. doi: 10.1007/s11912-014-0403-3 contributor: fullname: Werner – volume: 23 start-page: 1073 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0165 article-title: Evaluation of vascular space involvement in endometrial adenocarcinomas: laparoscopic vs abdominal hysterectomies publication-title: Mod. Pathol. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.91 contributor: fullname: Folkins – volume: 143 start-page: 46 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0210 article-title: Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma on diagnostic specimens is highly concordant with final hysterectomy: earlier prognostic information to guide treatment publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.090 contributor: fullname: Talhouk – volume: 141 start-page: 336 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0080 article-title: L1CAM is an independent predictor of poor survival in endometrial cancer - an analysis of the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.003 contributor: fullname: Dellinger – volume: 49 start-page: 625 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0175 article-title: A discordant histological risk classification in preoperative and operative biopsy in endometrial cancer is reflected in metastatic risk and prognosis publication-title: Eur. J. Cancer doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.09.006 contributor: fullname: Werner – volume: 26 start-page: 1465 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0070 article-title: L1 cell adhesion molecule as a predictor of disease-specific survival and patterns of relapse in endometrial cancer publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000801 contributor: fullname: Pasanen – volume: 37 start-page: 874 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0185 article-title: Poor interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of high-grade endometrial carcinoma publication-title: Am. J. Surg. Pathol. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31827f576a contributor: fullname: Gilks – volume: 115 start-page: 716 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0180 article-title: L1CAM expression in endometrial carcinomas: an ENITEC collaboration study publication-title: Br. J. Cancer doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.235 contributor: fullname: van der Putten – volume: 112 start-page: 793 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0170 article-title: Just how accurate are the major risk stratification systems for early-stage endometrial cancer publication-title: Br. J. Cancer doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.35 contributor: fullname: Bendifallah – volume: 48 start-page: 11026 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0195 article-title: The human asparaginase-like protein 1 hASRGL1 is an Ntn hydrolase with beta-aspartyl peptidase activity publication-title: Biochemistry doi: 10.1021/bi901397h contributor: fullname: Cantor – volume: 44 start-page: 472 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0055 article-title: Prognostic impact of histological grade and vascular invasion compared with tumour cell proliferation in endometrial carcinoma of endometrioid type publication-title: Histopathology doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01882.x contributor: fullname: Stefansson – volume: 108 start-page: 1208 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0050 article-title: Improved survival with an intact DNA mismatch repair system in endometrial cancer publication-title: Obstet. Gynecol. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000239097.42987.0c contributor: fullname: Cohn – volume: 110 start-page: 609 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0160 article-title: Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer publication-title: Br. J. Cancer doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.766 contributor: fullname: Helpman – volume: 88 start-page: 263 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0060 article-title: HER2/neu overexpression: has the Achilles' heel of uterine serous papillary carcinoma been exposed publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/S0090-8258(02)00094-X contributor: fullname: Santin – volume: 355 start-page: 1404 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0005 article-title: Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC study group. Post operative radiation therapy in endometrial carcinoma publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02139-5 contributor: fullname: Creutzberg – volume: 19 start-page: 670 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0045 article-title: Aromatase, cyclooxygenase 2, HER-2/neu, and p53 as prognostic factors in endometrioid endometrial cancer publication-title: Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a47c25 contributor: fullname: Jongen – volume: 126 start-page: 466 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0040 article-title: Improved risk assessment of endometrial cancer by combined analysis of MSI, PI3K-AKT, Wnt/β-catenin and P53 pathway activation publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.05.012 contributor: fullname: Nout – volume: 137 start-page: 245 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0090 article-title: Immunohistochemical and genetic profiles of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma arising from atrophic endometrium publication-title: Gynecol. Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.007 contributor: fullname: Geels – volume: 29 start-page: 174 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0075 article-title: Prognostic significance of L1CAM expression and its association with mutant p53 expression in high-risk endometrial cancer publication-title: Mod. Pathol. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.147 contributor: fullname: Van Gool – volume: 6 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0105 article-title: Meta-analysis of gene expression studies in endometrial cancer identifies gene expression profiles associated with aggressive disease and patient outcome publication-title: Sci. Rep. contributor: fullname: O'Mara – volume: 39 start-page: 1 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0145 article-title: Regularization paths for Cox's proportional hazards model via coordinate descent publication-title: J. Stat. Softw. doi: 10.18637/jss.v039.i05 contributor: fullname: Simon – volume: 50 start-page: 2602 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0065 article-title: L1 cell adhesion molecule is a strong predictor for distant recurrence and overall survival in early stage endometrial cancer: pooled PORTEC trial results publication-title: Eur. J. Cancer doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.07.014 contributor: fullname: Bosse – volume: 347 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0130 article-title: Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.1260419 contributor: fullname: Uhlén – volume: 41 start-page: 245 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0190 article-title: Interobserver agreement in endometrial carcinoma histotype diagnosis varies depending on the cancer genome atlas (TCGA)-based molecular subgroup publication-title: Am. J. Surg. Pathol. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000764 contributor: fullname: Hoang – volume: 105 start-page: 1142 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0010 article-title: L1CAM in early-stage type I endometrial cancer: results of a large multicenter evaluation publication-title: J. Natl. Cancer Inst. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt144 contributor: fullname: Zeimet – volume: 105 start-page: 109 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016_bb0115 article-title: Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium publication-title: Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.010 contributor: fullname: Creasman |
SSID | ssj0003012 |
Score | 2.3749855 |
Snippet | In clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based markers as... OBJECTIVEIn clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based... Objective: In clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based... Objective. In clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based... |
SourceID | swepub proquest crossref pubmed elsevier |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 173 |
SubjectTerms | adult aged antineoplastic agent asrg1 protein ASRGL1 brachytherapy cancer chemotherapy cancer grading cancer recurrence cancer surgery cancer survival disease specific survival Endometrial cancer endometrium carcinoma epidermal growth factor receptor 2 estrogen receptor female follow up high risk patient histopathology human human tissue immunohistochemistry immunoreactivity Ki 67 antigen l1cam protein low risk patient major clinical study middle aged Modelling MutL protein homolog 1 overall survival p53 priority journal progesterone receptor Prognostic protein p53 recurrence free survival recurrent disease Risk stratification tissue microarray tumor marker unclassified drug |
Title | Combined ASRGL1 and p53 immunohistochemistry as an independent predictor of survival in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29486992 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2009217443 https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-227355 https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-352701 https://research.chalmers.se/publication/501768 |
Volume | 149 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaqIiEuiDfhURkJOLE0ieOsfVwVysK2PRQKvY38SjegJqtNcigHfjtjJ9kKqHpAirRKxomiGXtmvJn5PkJe6tS63JkEV9rU_1vF2URJZiZqmsfMeRq7ADx_eJTPT7JPp_x0i-yNvTC-rHLw_b1PD956uLI7aHN3VZa-x9fTdXOMODhJMWz6DnYMfzin3_66LPNAWY8YHlqmuRiRh0KN18XZReU7ABMRgDs96fnV0enf7PMvaNEQjvbvkNtDHkln_aveJVuuukduHg5fyu-Tn7jQcdPrLJ19Pv5wkFBVWbrijJa-IaQOMMNmJHujqkE5LTeUuC1drf2jcENO64I2HToUnJI4gqK8Pvc0XHVpL09QZjwrUVWfqwfkZP_9l735ZOBZmBjOeTthWmuhRcJcUmA2aLlwmS1UYWPLDfetua4QRlqbCC2F0s7iERudcx22G-wh2a7qyj0mFPMZwSwOSmOTuVirJC6ktrLIC8aNLCLyZtQvrHo4DRjrzL5DMAd4c0CcAl6LSD7aAP6YFYAO__obX4wWA9Sk_wiiKld3DQSUKdyGZSwij3pTbt4klZnIpUwj8rq37UbiQbjflV9nUK_P4Ee7hBTTPs4j8uq6gV0HmN9O4yQiB1eMG-CclmCWgSungcYBalVmkjEojJaQKZGBdI6BTqdpzp3Islg_-V-1PCW3_FlfefSMbLfrzj3HpKrVO2HV7JAbs4-L-ZH_XRx_W_wGDJomjw |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,783,787,888,4509,24128,27936,27937,45597,45691 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZKKwEXxJvwNBJwImoSx1n7uCqULd3dA7Sot1H8SDegJqtNcii_nrGTLAKqHpByScaJrBl7PBN7vo-QNyoxNrM6xpk2cX-rOAtzyXSYT7KIWUdj54HnF8tsdpp-PuNnO-RgrIVxxyoH39_7dO-thyf7gzb312XpanwdXTfHFQcHKS6bN8geRgMSZ-fe9Oh4ttw6ZBT3oOG-apqLEXzIH_O6PL-sXBFgLDx2p-M9v3qB-jcA_Qtd1K9Ih3fJnSGUpNO-t_fIjq3uk5uLYbP8AfmJcx3zXmvo9OuXT_OY5pWha85o6WpCao80rEe-N5o3KKfllhW3peuN-xTm5LQuaNOhT8FRiS0oyusLx8RVl-b3Dcq0Iyaq6ov8ITk9_HhyMAsHqoVQc87bkCmlhBIxs3GBAaHhwqamyAsTGa65q861hdDSmFgoKXJlDV6RVhlXPuNgj8huVVf2CaEY0ghmsFES6dRGKo-jQioji6xgXMsiIO9H_cK6R9SA8ajZd_DmAGcOiBLAZwHJRhvAHwMD0Odf_-Lr0WKAmnT7IHll664BDzSFmVjKAvK4N-W2J4lMRSZlEpB3vW23EofD_aH8NoV6cw4_2hUkGPlxHpC31zXsOsAQdxLFAZlf0W5AdFqBXnm6nAYaC6hVmUrGoNBKQpqLFKS1DFQySTJuRZpG6un_quUVuTU7WcxhfrQ8fkZuO0l_EOk52W03nX2BMVarXg5z6BfSdieg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined+ASRGL1+and+p53+immunohistochemistry+as+an+independent+predictor+of+survival+in+endometrioid+endometrial+carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic+oncology&rft.au=Huvila%2C+Jutta&rft.au=Laajala%2C+Teemu+D.&rft.au=Edqvist%2C+Per-Henrik&rft.au=Mardinoglu%2C+Adil&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=180&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ygyno.2018.02.016&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_ygyno_2018_02_016 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0090-8258&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0090-8258&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0090-8258&client=summon |