Altruism, reciprocity and health: A social experiment in restaurant choice

► Our experiment showed people reciprocate food gifts and imitate restaurant choice. ► The majority chose unhealthy restaurants when their randomly assigned partner did. ► Similarly, the majority chose healthy restaurants when their partner did. ► The altruistic were significantly more likely to cho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood policy Vol. 37; no. 2; pp. 143 - 150
Main Authors Keane, Christopher R., Lafky, Jonathan M., Board, Oliver J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2012
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► Our experiment showed people reciprocate food gifts and imitate restaurant choice. ► The majority chose unhealthy restaurants when their randomly assigned partner did. ► Similarly, the majority chose healthy restaurants when their partner did. ► The altruistic were significantly more likely to choose healthy restaurants. ► Policies should capitalize on people’s tendency towards altruism and imitation. We used an experimental game to determine whether people imitate restaurant choice, reciprocate food gifts, and thus spread health choices. We randomly paired 138 subjects and recorded their decision to give or keep restaurant vouchers and their choice of restaurant. The majority (83.3%) chose an unhealthy restaurant if their randomly assigned partner chose an unhealthy restaurant. Similarly, 77.8% chose a healthy restaurant if their partner did (p=0.005). The altruistic were more likely to choose a healthy restaurant (p=0.017). In sum, restaurant choice is influenced by reciprocity. A cycle of projection, gifting and reciprocation may explain the social dynamics of food choice. We propose policies that capitalize on people’s tendency towards altruism and imitation.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.12.002
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0306-9192
1873-5657
DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.12.002