Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand
Background and Aim: Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastr...
Saved in:
Published in | Veterinary World Vol. 16; no. 12; pp. 2416 - 2424 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
India
Veterinary World
01.12.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background and Aim: Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand.
Materials and Methods: One hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method.
Results: According to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for Strongyloides spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including Entamoeba histolytica species complex, Entamoeba coli, Giardia spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, Strongyloides spp., Ascarididae, and Trichuris spp.).
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals’ close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers.
Keywords: captive mammals, gastrointestinal parasites, zoo, zoonotic parasites. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand.Background and AimCaptive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand.One hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method.Materials and MethodsOne hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method.According to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for Strongyloides spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including Entamoeba histolytica species complex, Entamoeba coli, Giardia spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, Strongyloides spp., Ascarididae, and Trichuris spp.).ResultsAccording to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for Strongyloides spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including Entamoeba histolytica species complex, Entamoeba coli, Giardia spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, Strongyloides spp., Ascarididae, and Trichuris spp.).The findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals' close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers.ConclusionThe findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals' close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers. Background and Aim: Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand. Materials and Methods: One hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method. Results: According to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for Strongyloides spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including Entamoeba histolytica species complex, Entamoeba coli, Giardia spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, Strongyloides spp., Ascarididae, and Trichuris spp.). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals’ close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers. Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand. One hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method. According to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including species complex, , spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, spp., Ascarididae, and spp.). The findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals' close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers. Background and Aim: Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand. Materials and Methods: One hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method. Results: According to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for Strongyloides spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including Entamoeba histolytica species complex, Entamoeba coli, Giardia spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, Strongyloides spp., Ascarididae, and Trichuris spp.). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals' close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers. Keywords: captive mammals, gastrointestinal parasites, zoo, zoonotic parasites. Background and Aim: Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand. Materials and Methods: One hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method. Results: According to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for Strongyloides spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including Entamoeba histolytica species complex, Entamoeba coli, Giardia spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, Strongyloides spp., Ascarididae, and Trichuris spp.). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals’ close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers. Keywords: captive mammals, gastrointestinal parasites, zoo, zoonotic parasites. |
Audience | Professional |
Author | Chaisongkram, Chavin Laoprom, Nonglak Hongsrichan, Nuttanan Kimkamkaew, Siriwan Sithithaworn, Paiboon Artchayasawat, Atchara Ponsrila, Kanda Eamudomkarn, Chatanun Pitaksakulrat, Opal Sangpeng, Jirawat Boonmars, Thidarut |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand 3 Department of General Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kasetsart University, Chalermphrakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus, Sakon Nakhon, 47000, Thailand 2 Department of Research Conservation and Animal Health, Khon Kaen Zoo, 40280, Thailand |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Department of Research Conservation and Animal Health, Khon Kaen Zoo, 40280, Thailand – name: 1 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand – name: 3 Department of General Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kasetsart University, Chalermphrakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus, Sakon Nakhon, 47000, Thailand |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jirawat orcidid: 0009-0008-6049-5048 surname: Sangpeng fullname: Sangpeng, Jirawat organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand – sequence: 2 givenname: Chatanun orcidid: 0000-0002-6193-9842 surname: Eamudomkarn fullname: Eamudomkarn, Chatanun organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand – sequence: 3 givenname: Nuttanan orcidid: 0000-0001-8058-9406 surname: Hongsrichan fullname: Hongsrichan, Nuttanan organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand – sequence: 4 givenname: Atchara orcidid: 0000-0001-9256-8143 surname: Artchayasawat fullname: Artchayasawat, Atchara organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand – sequence: 5 givenname: Chavin orcidid: 0009-0004-4483-571X surname: Chaisongkram fullname: Chaisongkram, Chavin organization: Department of Research Conservation and Animal Health, Khon Kaen Zoo, 40280, Thailand – sequence: 6 givenname: Kanda orcidid: 0009-0005-9989-5848 surname: Ponsrila fullname: Ponsrila, Kanda organization: Department of Research Conservation and Animal Health, Khon Kaen Zoo, 40280, Thailand – sequence: 7 givenname: Siriwan orcidid: 0009-0003-7883-0135 surname: Kimkamkaew fullname: Kimkamkaew, Siriwan organization: Department of Research Conservation and Animal Health, Khon Kaen Zoo, 40280, Thailand – sequence: 8 givenname: Nonglak orcidid: 0009-0007-0996-2002 surname: Laoprom fullname: Laoprom, Nonglak organization: Department of General Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kasetsart University, Chalermphrakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus, Sakon Nakhon, 47000, Thailand – sequence: 9 givenname: Thidarut orcidid: 0000-0002-7262-7190 surname: Boonmars fullname: Boonmars, Thidarut organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand – sequence: 10 givenname: Paiboon orcidid: 0000-0002-9480-1778 surname: Sithithaworn fullname: Sithithaworn, Paiboon organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand – sequence: 11 givenname: Opal orcidid: 0000-0002-1401-3385 surname: Pitaksakulrat fullname: Pitaksakulrat, Opal organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38328364$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkl1vFCEYhYmpsWvtXzAk3njhrHzNDNxomsaPpk30onrhDWGYl12aGVgZdo3_XqbbNa4xEUImwOEZ3sN5ik5CDIAQpmRJBSPs9Q7yj5iGflkmfMkEbSommHiEFoxxWhFFmxO0IKpllVRSnqLzabojpQnCFKufoFMuOZO8EQv09XOCnRkgWMDR4ZWZcoo-ZJiyD2bAG5PM5MsU-4Ct2WS_AzyacTTDhE3G1-sY8LWBgL_F-Arfro0fTOifoceuKOD84XuGvrx_d3v5sbr59OHq8uKmsnUtcqUkOOB9J5yrlW3ACU563nRlCM5MW6uetKKlQgjVEei4ILYlSijXdYqLmp-hqz23j-ZOb5IfTfqpo_H6fiGmlTYpezuAZk7ZnppeglEF2SjjhGoBalWcUZ0srLd71mbbjdBbCDmZ4Qh6vBP8Wq_iTlMihWglLYSXD4QUv2-LhXr0k4WhOAJxO-niPleUU6aK9MVeuirmax9cLEg7y_VFK1nNZFu3RbX8h6r0HkZvSyycL-tHB57_WcPvyx8evAje7AU2xWlK4LT12WQf55L8UGrR9yHTh5DpOWR6DpmeQ1YA8i_A4R__PfoLIFjYpw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijppaw_2024_101012 crossref_primary_10_14202_vetworld_2024_1391_1396 |
Cites_doi | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002002 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115430 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.09.034 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.05.003 10.1051/parasite/2022040 10.1016/j.zoolgart.2013.04.005 10.1016/0035-9203(86)90384-6 10.1002/vms3.1093 10.1002/vms3.1039 10.4067/s0716-07202001000300009 10.3390/life11010018 10.1016/j.pt.2019.04.004 10.14202/vetworld.2016.540-543 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105896 10.4314/njpar.v31i1.69456 10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.12.012 10.1007/s00436-021-07325-2 10.3923/pjbs.2011.709.714 10.1007/s00436-017-5469-z 10.1017/s0031182009991120 10.7589/2018-10-244 10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.11.005 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.05.023 10.1002/vms3.651 10.4314/gmj.v50i4.2 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00128-4 10.3389/fvets.2021.819887 10.3201/eid2110.141456 10.3390/ani12131719 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.12.004 10.1007/s11356-020-11561-x 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.05.007 10.4025/revcivet.v6i1.42339 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118833 10.2478/s11686-019-00145-6 10.1002/sim.4780101211 10.1007/s00436-020-06947-2 10.1186/s12917-020-02490-5 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004133 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.06.020 10.3390/pathogens9070561 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.07.015 10.1080/00034983.1990.11812477 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.007 10.1186/s13071-019-3449-0 10.4269/ajtmh.1942.s1-22.131 10.1590/s1984-29612023028 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright: © Sangpeng, et al. COPYRIGHT 2023 Veterinary World Copyright: © Sangpeng, . 2023 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright: © Sangpeng, et al. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 Veterinary World – notice: Copyright: © Sangpeng, . 2023 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.14202/vetworld.2023.2416-2424 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Veterinary Medicine |
EISSN | 2231-0916 |
EndPage | 2424 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_2f9cd1ad8ea947169af497ee590009b8 PMC10844781 A782528757 38328364 10_14202_vetworld_2023_2416_2424 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Brazil Thailand |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Thailand – name: Brazil |
GroupedDBID | 04Q 04S 04W 53G 5VS 8FE 8FH AAFWJ AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BHPHI BPHCQ CCPQU CITATION DYU ECGQY EOJEC ESX EYRJQ GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ HYE IAO IEA IPNFZ ITC KQ8 LK8 M48 M7P N.T OBODZ OK1 OZF PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC RIG RNS RPM TR2 TUS ~KM NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-98efe3db4ff59c6ef430d36bd36432a759d074714449b0eb340c70949fbb93453 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 0972-8988 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:08:17 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:35:27 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 11:33:12 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 00:15:15 EST 2025 Wed Feb 12 07:29:57 EST 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:28:58 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:25 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:48:12 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 12 |
Keywords | captive mammals zoonotic parasites zoo gastrointestinal parasites |
Language | English |
License | Copyright: © Sangpeng, et al. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c554t-98efe3db4ff59c6ef430d36bd36432a759d074714449b0eb340c70949fbb93453 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-6193-9842 0000-0002-9480-1778 0009-0003-7883-0135 0009-0007-0996-2002 0000-0002-1401-3385 0000-0001-8058-9406 0000-0002-7262-7190 0009-0008-6049-5048 0009-0004-4483-571X 0009-0005-9989-5848 0000-0001-9256-8143 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/2f9cd1ad8ea947169af497ee590009b8 |
PMID | 38328364 |
PQID | 2923913129 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2f9cd1ad8ea947169af497ee590009b8 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10844781 proquest_miscellaneous_2923913129 gale_infotracmisc_A782528757 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A782528757 pubmed_primary_38328364 crossref_citationtrail_10_14202_vetworld_2023_2416_2424 crossref_primary_10_14202_vetworld_2023_2416_2424 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-12-00 2023-Dec 20231201 2023-12-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2023 text: 2023-12-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | India |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: India |
PublicationTitle | Veterinary World |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Vet World |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Veterinary World |
Publisher_xml | – name: Veterinary World |
References | ref13 ref12 ref15 ref14 ref53 ref52 ref11 ref10 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref51 ref50 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 ref35 ref34 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref33 ref32 ref0 ref2 ref1 ref39 ref38 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref29 |
References_xml | – ident: ref46 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002002 – ident: ref45 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115430 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.09.034 – ident: ref24 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.05.003 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1051/parasite/2022040 – ident: ref27 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1016/j.zoolgart.2013.04.005 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(86)90384-6 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1002/vms3.1093 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1002/vms3.1039 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.4067/s0716-07202001000300009 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.3390/life11010018 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.04.004 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.540-543 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105896 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.4314/njpar.v31i1.69456 – ident: ref47 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.12.012 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07325-2 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2011.709.714 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1007/s00436-017-5469-z – ident: ref43 doi: 10.1017/s0031182009991120 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.7589/2018-10-244 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.11.005 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.05.023 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1002/vms3.651 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.4314/gmj.v50i4.2 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00128-4 – ident: ref3 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.819887 – ident: ref25 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.3201/eid2110.141456 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.3390/ani12131719 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.12.004 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11561-x – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.05.007 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.4025/revcivet.v6i1.42339 – ident: ref50 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118833 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.2478/s11686-019-00145-6 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1002/sim.4780101211 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06947-2 – ident: ref28 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02490-5 – ident: ref0 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004133 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.06.020 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.3390/pathogens9070561 – ident: ref49 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.07.015 – ident: ref52 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1080/00034983.1990.11812477 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.007 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3449-0 – ident: ref51 doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1942.s1-22.131 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1590/s1984-29612023028 |
SSID | ssj0000402925 |
Score | 2.2958932 |
Snippet | Background and Aim: Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as... Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 2416 |
SubjectTerms | Acetates captive mammals Disease susceptibility Esters Formaldehyde gastrointestinal parasites Reservoirs zoo Zoonoses zoonotic parasites Zoos |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZKuXBBUF6BgoyExIWUJHY29gGhgqgqquXUrSoulp_dlXaTsptW5d8z4_WuGoEQBw6RojiJ7Hl5Rp75hpA3Ep6L4EF4LQ94zChz7QqZW1YLw4x3IiZjjr-Njif863l9vkM25YqJgKs_hnbYT2qynB_c_Pj5ERT-Ayo8h-D9_XXMmJ4j8GfFDmBPGuFJJ79D7sJ9g-o6Tk5_tM8QMsnYjRWha3IhhUgpPn_72WDfivD-vxvxW7vYMMPy1pZ19IDcT74mPVwLx0Oy49s9sneGCTCxCpeO08H6I3KGUE46FiDRLtALveqXHUJJgAXAfyBCOJ4zr-ispVZfopGkC71YABWp7unJtGvpifYt_d517-jpVM8wZfIxmRx9Of18nKeWC7kFv6LPpfDBM2d4CLW0Ix84KxwbGbg4q3RTS4eI-xCFcWkKCMR5YRuIEGUwRjJesydkt-1a_4zQhoWmDq7SEJIhqptB2J0a3AMfqsaVIiPNhqDKJjxybIsxVxiXICvUhhUKWaGQFQpZkZFy--XlGpPjH775hDzbvo-o2vFBt7xQSUlVFaR1pXbCa8kRRkgHLhvvY2dVaWDKb5HjCqURpmp1KmGABSOKljoEd6uusEVARvYHb4LO2sHw643MKBzCRLfWd1crBZLJZMnAC8vI07UMbefMwPoKYERGxEC6BosajrSzaYQMLwvBsaj4-f8gwwtyD4m7TurZJ7v98sq_BNesN6-ipv0Csqc1ZQ priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38328364 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2923913129 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10844781 https://doaj.org/article/2f9cd1ad8ea947169af497ee590009b8 |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6hnrggKK_QgoyExIXQJHY29rEgqopqOXWrwsXyk12pm1TdlN_PjJNdbcQBDhySQ5xEtmfsmZG_-QbgncLnMgZUXiciHTOq3PhC5Y7X0nIbvExgzPm32flCfL2ur_dKfREmbKAHHibupIrK-dJ4GYwSRO1iolBNCKnapbIpzRdt3l4wlfZgDItUqrhK9DS5VFKOMB6B0f7JrwSxviGm0Ip_RCM2o6NRMbFNicL_z416z1JNUZR7ZunsMTwa_Ul2OozjCTwI7SEcXhHIJWXasvl4eP4UroiuyaQkI9ZF9tNs-ruO6CJwldM_iAWczpI3bNUyZ25pI2Rrs16jhjLTs4tl17ILE1r2o-s-sMulWREs8hkszr5cfj7Px7IKuUPfoc-VDDFwb0WMtXKzEAUvPJ9ZvASvTFMrT6z6GGkJZQsMtkXhGowCVbRWcVHz53DQdm14CazhsamjrwyGXcTcZolap0YXIMSq8aXMoNlOqHYj5ziVvrjRFHuQKPRWFJpEoUkUmkSRQbn78nbg3fiHbz6RzHbvE3N2eoD6pEd90n_Tpwzek8Q1rW_sqjNjmgIOmJiy9Cm6VHVFZQAyOJ68ievSTZrfbnVGUxOB2drQ3W80aiZXJUdPK4MXgw7t-sxxh5UoiAzkRLsmg5q2tKtlogUvCykocfjV_5iGI3hIkzsAd47hoL-7D6_R_ertm7TS6P59gfe5kL8BE30s_g |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence+of+gastrointestinal+parasites+in+captive+mammals+at+Khon+Kaen+Zoo%2C+Thailand&rft.jtitle=Veterinary+World&rft.au=Jirawat+Sangpeng&rft.au=Chatanun+Eamudomkarn&rft.au=Nuttanan+Hongsrichan&rft.au=Atchara+Artchayasawat&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.pub=Veterinary+World&rft.issn=0972-8988&rft.eissn=2231-0916&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2416&rft.epage=2424&rft_id=info:doi/10.14202%2Fvetworld.2023.2416-2424&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_2f9cd1ad8ea947169af497ee590009b8 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0972-8988&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0972-8988&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0972-8988&client=summon |