Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand

Background and Aim: Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVeterinary World Vol. 16; no. 12; pp. 2416 - 2424
Main Authors Sangpeng, Jirawat, Eamudomkarn, Chatanun, Hongsrichan, Nuttanan, Artchayasawat, Atchara, Chaisongkram, Chavin, Ponsrila, Kanda, Kimkamkaew, Siriwan, Laoprom, Nonglak, Boonmars, Thidarut, Sithithaworn, Paiboon, Pitaksakulrat, Opal
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published India Veterinary World 01.12.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background and Aim: Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand. Materials and Methods: One hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method. Results: According to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for Strongyloides spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including Entamoeba histolytica species complex, Entamoeba coli, Giardia spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, Strongyloides spp., Ascarididae, and Trichuris spp.). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals’ close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers. Keywords: captive mammals, gastrointestinal parasites, zoo, zoonotic parasites.
AbstractList Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand.Background and AimCaptive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand.One hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method.Materials and MethodsOne hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method.According to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for Strongyloides spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including Entamoeba histolytica species complex, Entamoeba coli, Giardia spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, Strongyloides spp., Ascarididae, and Trichuris spp.).ResultsAccording to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for Strongyloides spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including Entamoeba histolytica species complex, Entamoeba coli, Giardia spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, Strongyloides spp., Ascarididae, and Trichuris spp.).The findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals' close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers.ConclusionThe findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals' close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers.
Background and Aim: Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand. Materials and Methods: One hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method. Results: According to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for Strongyloides spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including Entamoeba histolytica species complex, Entamoeba coli, Giardia spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, Strongyloides spp., Ascarididae, and Trichuris spp.). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals’ close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers.
Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand. One hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method. According to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including species complex, , spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, spp., Ascarididae, and spp.). The findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals' close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers.
Background and Aim: Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand. Materials and Methods: One hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method. Results: According to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for Strongyloides spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including Entamoeba histolytica species complex, Entamoeba coli, Giardia spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, Strongyloides spp., Ascarididae, and Trichuris spp.). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals' close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers. Keywords: captive mammals, gastrointestinal parasites, zoo, zoonotic parasites.
Background and Aim: Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic parasites that have the potential to infect humans. To investigate this possibility, we estimated the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand. Materials and Methods: One hundred and forty-seven individual mammals (37 primates, 43 carnivores, 62 herbivores, and 5 rodents) were examined for parasitic infections by fecal examination daily for 3 consecutive days using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and the agar plate culture method. Results: According to FECT, the overall prevalence of GI parasites was 62.6% (92/147). Within animal groups, the numbers were as follows: 67.6% (25/37) in primates, 23.3% (10/43) in carnivores, 85.5% (53/62) in herbivores, and 80.0% (4/5) in rodents. Using the agar plate culture method, 21.43% (27/126) were positive for Strongyloides spp. and hookworm infections. The GI parasites identified belonged to three categories: protozoa (including Entamoeba histolytica species complex, Entamoeba coli, Giardia spp., coccidia, and ciliated protozoa), trematodes (minute intestinal flukes and rumen flukes), and nematodes (strongyle/hookworm, Strongyloides spp., Ascarididae, and Trichuris spp.). Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate the prevalence of several GI parasites in zoo animals with the potential for transmission to humans, given the animals’ close proximity to both visitors and animal caretakers. Keywords: captive mammals, gastrointestinal parasites, zoo, zoonotic parasites.
Audience Professional
Author Chaisongkram, Chavin
Laoprom, Nonglak
Hongsrichan, Nuttanan
Kimkamkaew, Siriwan
Sithithaworn, Paiboon
Artchayasawat, Atchara
Ponsrila, Kanda
Eamudomkarn, Chatanun
Pitaksakulrat, Opal
Sangpeng, Jirawat
Boonmars, Thidarut
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
3 Department of General Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kasetsart University, Chalermphrakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus, Sakon Nakhon, 47000, Thailand
2 Department of Research Conservation and Animal Health, Khon Kaen Zoo, 40280, Thailand
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Department of Research Conservation and Animal Health, Khon Kaen Zoo, 40280, Thailand
– name: 1 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
– name: 3 Department of General Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kasetsart University, Chalermphrakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus, Sakon Nakhon, 47000, Thailand
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jirawat
  orcidid: 0009-0008-6049-5048
  surname: Sangpeng
  fullname: Sangpeng, Jirawat
  organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Chatanun
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6193-9842
  surname: Eamudomkarn
  fullname: Eamudomkarn, Chatanun
  organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Nuttanan
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8058-9406
  surname: Hongsrichan
  fullname: Hongsrichan, Nuttanan
  organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Atchara
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9256-8143
  surname: Artchayasawat
  fullname: Artchayasawat, Atchara
  organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Chavin
  orcidid: 0009-0004-4483-571X
  surname: Chaisongkram
  fullname: Chaisongkram, Chavin
  organization: Department of Research Conservation and Animal Health, Khon Kaen Zoo, 40280, Thailand
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Kanda
  orcidid: 0009-0005-9989-5848
  surname: Ponsrila
  fullname: Ponsrila, Kanda
  organization: Department of Research Conservation and Animal Health, Khon Kaen Zoo, 40280, Thailand
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Siriwan
  orcidid: 0009-0003-7883-0135
  surname: Kimkamkaew
  fullname: Kimkamkaew, Siriwan
  organization: Department of Research Conservation and Animal Health, Khon Kaen Zoo, 40280, Thailand
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Nonglak
  orcidid: 0009-0007-0996-2002
  surname: Laoprom
  fullname: Laoprom, Nonglak
  organization: Department of General Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kasetsart University, Chalermphrakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus, Sakon Nakhon, 47000, Thailand
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Thidarut
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7262-7190
  surname: Boonmars
  fullname: Boonmars, Thidarut
  organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Paiboon
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9480-1778
  surname: Sithithaworn
  fullname: Sithithaworn, Paiboon
  organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Opal
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1401-3385
  surname: Pitaksakulrat
  fullname: Pitaksakulrat, Opal
  organization: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38328364$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkl1vFCEYhYmpsWvtXzAk3njhrHzNDNxomsaPpk30onrhDWGYl12aGVgZdo3_XqbbNa4xEUImwOEZ3sN5ik5CDIAQpmRJBSPs9Q7yj5iGflkmfMkEbSommHiEFoxxWhFFmxO0IKpllVRSnqLzabojpQnCFKufoFMuOZO8EQv09XOCnRkgWMDR4ZWZcoo-ZJiyD2bAG5PM5MsU-4Ct2WS_AzyacTTDhE3G1-sY8LWBgL_F-Arfro0fTOifoceuKOD84XuGvrx_d3v5sbr59OHq8uKmsnUtcqUkOOB9J5yrlW3ACU563nRlCM5MW6uetKKlQgjVEei4ILYlSijXdYqLmp-hqz23j-ZOb5IfTfqpo_H6fiGmlTYpezuAZk7ZnppeglEF2SjjhGoBalWcUZ0srLd71mbbjdBbCDmZ4Qh6vBP8Wq_iTlMihWglLYSXD4QUv2-LhXr0k4WhOAJxO-niPleUU6aK9MVeuirmax9cLEg7y_VFK1nNZFu3RbX8h6r0HkZvSyycL-tHB57_WcPvyx8evAje7AU2xWlK4LT12WQf55L8UGrR9yHTh5DpOWR6DpmeQ1YA8i_A4R__PfoLIFjYpw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijppaw_2024_101012
crossref_primary_10_14202_vetworld_2024_1391_1396
Cites_doi 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002002
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115430
10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.09.034
10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.05.003
10.1051/parasite/2022040
10.1016/j.zoolgart.2013.04.005
10.1016/0035-9203(86)90384-6
10.1002/vms3.1093
10.1002/vms3.1039
10.4067/s0716-07202001000300009
10.3390/life11010018
10.1016/j.pt.2019.04.004
10.14202/vetworld.2016.540-543
10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105896
10.4314/njpar.v31i1.69456
10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.12.012
10.1007/s00436-021-07325-2
10.3923/pjbs.2011.709.714
10.1007/s00436-017-5469-z
10.1017/s0031182009991120
10.7589/2018-10-244
10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.11.005
10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.05.023
10.1002/vms3.651
10.4314/gmj.v50i4.2
10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00128-4
10.3389/fvets.2021.819887
10.3201/eid2110.141456
10.3390/ani12131719
10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.12.004
10.1007/s11356-020-11561-x
10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.05.007
10.4025/revcivet.v6i1.42339
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118833
10.2478/s11686-019-00145-6
10.1002/sim.4780101211
10.1007/s00436-020-06947-2
10.1186/s12917-020-02490-5
10.1371/journal.pntd.0004133
10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.06.020
10.3390/pathogens9070561
10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.07.015
10.1080/00034983.1990.11812477
10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.007
10.1186/s13071-019-3449-0
10.4269/ajtmh.1942.s1-22.131
10.1590/s1984-29612023028
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright: © Sangpeng, et al.
COPYRIGHT 2023 Veterinary World
Copyright: © Sangpeng, . 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright: © Sangpeng, et al.
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 Veterinary World
– notice: Copyright: © Sangpeng, . 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.14202/vetworld.2023.2416-2424
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed

CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Veterinary Medicine
EISSN 2231-0916
EndPage 2424
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_2f9cd1ad8ea947169af497ee590009b8
PMC10844781
A782528757
38328364
10_14202_vetworld_2023_2416_2424
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Brazil
Thailand
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Thailand
– name: Brazil
GroupedDBID 04Q
04S
04W
53G
5VS
8FE
8FH
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BHPHI
BPHCQ
CCPQU
CITATION
DYU
ECGQY
EOJEC
ESX
EYRJQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
HCIFZ
HYE
IAO
IEA
IPNFZ
ITC
KQ8
LK8
M48
M7P
N.T
OBODZ
OK1
OZF
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
RIG
RNS
RPM
TR2
TUS
~KM
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-98efe3db4ff59c6ef430d36bd36432a759d074714449b0eb340c70949fbb93453
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 0972-8988
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:08:17 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:35:27 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 11:33:12 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 00:15:15 EST 2025
Wed Feb 12 07:29:57 EST 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:28:58 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:52:25 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:48:12 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 12
Keywords captive mammals
zoonotic parasites
zoo
gastrointestinal parasites
Language English
License Copyright: © Sangpeng, et al.
Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c554t-98efe3db4ff59c6ef430d36bd36432a759d074714449b0eb340c70949fbb93453
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-6193-9842
0000-0002-9480-1778
0009-0003-7883-0135
0009-0007-0996-2002
0000-0002-1401-3385
0000-0001-8058-9406
0000-0002-7262-7190
0009-0008-6049-5048
0009-0004-4483-571X
0009-0005-9989-5848
0000-0001-9256-8143
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/2f9cd1ad8ea947169af497ee590009b8
PMID 38328364
PQID 2923913129
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2f9cd1ad8ea947169af497ee590009b8
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10844781
proquest_miscellaneous_2923913129
gale_infotracmisc_A782528757
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A782528757
pubmed_primary_38328364
crossref_citationtrail_10_14202_vetworld_2023_2416_2424
crossref_primary_10_14202_vetworld_2023_2416_2424
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-12-00
2023-Dec
20231201
2023-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-12-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace India
PublicationPlace_xml – name: India
PublicationTitle Veterinary World
PublicationTitleAlternate Vet World
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Veterinary World
Publisher_xml – name: Veterinary World
References ref13
ref12
ref15
ref14
ref53
ref52
ref11
ref10
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref51
ref50
ref46
ref45
ref48
ref47
ref42
ref41
ref44
ref43
ref49
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref40
ref35
ref34
ref37
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref33
ref32
ref0
ref2
ref1
ref39
ref38
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref22
ref21
ref28
ref27
ref29
References_xml – ident: ref46
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002002
– ident: ref45
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115430
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.09.034
– ident: ref24
– ident: ref48
  doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.05.003
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1051/parasite/2022040
– ident: ref27
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1016/j.zoolgart.2013.04.005
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(86)90384-6
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1002/vms3.1093
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1002/vms3.1039
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.4067/s0716-07202001000300009
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.3390/life11010018
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.04.004
– ident: ref39
  doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.540-543
– ident: ref53
  doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105896
– ident: ref42
  doi: 10.4314/njpar.v31i1.69456
– ident: ref47
  doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.12.012
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07325-2
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2011.709.714
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1007/s00436-017-5469-z
– ident: ref43
  doi: 10.1017/s0031182009991120
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.7589/2018-10-244
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.11.005
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.05.023
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.1002/vms3.651
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.4314/gmj.v50i4.2
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00128-4
– ident: ref3
– ident: ref44
  doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.819887
– ident: ref25
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.3201/eid2110.141456
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.3390/ani12131719
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.12.004
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11561-x
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.05.007
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.4025/revcivet.v6i1.42339
– ident: ref50
  doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118833
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.2478/s11686-019-00145-6
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1002/sim.4780101211
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06947-2
– ident: ref28
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02490-5
– ident: ref0
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004133
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.06.020
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.3390/pathogens9070561
– ident: ref49
– ident: ref33
  doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.07.015
– ident: ref52
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1080/00034983.1990.11812477
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.007
– ident: ref41
  doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3449-0
– ident: ref51
  doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1942.s1-22.131
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.1590/s1984-29612023028
SSID ssj0000402925
Score 2.2958932
Snippet Background and Aim: Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as...
Captive animals are susceptible to parasitic diseases due to the stress and confinement they experience. In addition, they can serve as reservoirs of zoonotic...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 2416
SubjectTerms Acetates
captive mammals
Disease susceptibility
Esters
Formaldehyde
gastrointestinal parasites
Reservoirs
zoo
Zoonoses
zoonotic parasites
Zoos
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZKuXBBUF6BgoyExIWUJHY29gGhgqgqquXUrSoulp_dlXaTsptW5d8z4_WuGoEQBw6RojiJ7Hl5Rp75hpA3Ep6L4EF4LQ94zChz7QqZW1YLw4x3IiZjjr-Njif863l9vkM25YqJgKs_hnbYT2qynB_c_Pj5ERT-Ayo8h-D9_XXMmJ4j8GfFDmBPGuFJJ79D7sJ9g-o6Tk5_tM8QMsnYjRWha3IhhUgpPn_72WDfivD-vxvxW7vYMMPy1pZ19IDcT74mPVwLx0Oy49s9sneGCTCxCpeO08H6I3KGUE46FiDRLtALveqXHUJJgAXAfyBCOJ4zr-ispVZfopGkC71YABWp7unJtGvpifYt_d517-jpVM8wZfIxmRx9Of18nKeWC7kFv6LPpfDBM2d4CLW0Ix84KxwbGbg4q3RTS4eI-xCFcWkKCMR5YRuIEGUwRjJesydkt-1a_4zQhoWmDq7SEJIhqptB2J0a3AMfqsaVIiPNhqDKJjxybIsxVxiXICvUhhUKWaGQFQpZkZFy--XlGpPjH775hDzbvo-o2vFBt7xQSUlVFaR1pXbCa8kRRkgHLhvvY2dVaWDKb5HjCqURpmp1KmGABSOKljoEd6uusEVARvYHb4LO2sHw643MKBzCRLfWd1crBZLJZMnAC8vI07UMbefMwPoKYERGxEC6BosajrSzaYQMLwvBsaj4-f8gwwtyD4m7TurZJ7v98sq_BNesN6-ipv0Csqc1ZQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in captive mammals at Khon Kaen Zoo, Thailand
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38328364
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2923913129
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10844781
https://doaj.org/article/2f9cd1ad8ea947169af497ee590009b8
Volume 16
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6hnrggKK_QgoyExIXQJHY29rEgqopqOXWrwsXyk12pm1TdlN_PjJNdbcQBDhySQ5xEtmfsmZG_-QbgncLnMgZUXiciHTOq3PhC5Y7X0nIbvExgzPm32flCfL2ur_dKfREmbKAHHibupIrK-dJ4GYwSRO1iolBNCKnapbIpzRdt3l4wlfZgDItUqrhK9DS5VFKOMB6B0f7JrwSxviGm0Ip_RCM2o6NRMbFNicL_z416z1JNUZR7ZunsMTwa_Ul2OozjCTwI7SEcXhHIJWXasvl4eP4UroiuyaQkI9ZF9tNs-ruO6CJwldM_iAWczpI3bNUyZ25pI2Rrs16jhjLTs4tl17ILE1r2o-s-sMulWREs8hkszr5cfj7Px7IKuUPfoc-VDDFwb0WMtXKzEAUvPJ9ZvASvTFMrT6z6GGkJZQsMtkXhGowCVbRWcVHz53DQdm14CazhsamjrwyGXcTcZolap0YXIMSq8aXMoNlOqHYj5ziVvrjRFHuQKPRWFJpEoUkUmkSRQbn78nbg3fiHbz6RzHbvE3N2eoD6pEd90n_Tpwzek8Q1rW_sqjNjmgIOmJiy9Cm6VHVFZQAyOJ68ievSTZrfbnVGUxOB2drQ3W80aiZXJUdPK4MXgw7t-sxxh5UoiAzkRLsmg5q2tKtlogUvCykocfjV_5iGI3hIkzsAd47hoL-7D6_R_ertm7TS6P59gfe5kL8BE30s_g
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence+of+gastrointestinal+parasites+in+captive+mammals+at+Khon+Kaen+Zoo%2C+Thailand&rft.jtitle=Veterinary+World&rft.au=Jirawat+Sangpeng&rft.au=Chatanun+Eamudomkarn&rft.au=Nuttanan+Hongsrichan&rft.au=Atchara+Artchayasawat&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.pub=Veterinary+World&rft.issn=0972-8988&rft.eissn=2231-0916&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2416&rft.epage=2424&rft_id=info:doi/10.14202%2Fvetworld.2023.2416-2424&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_2f9cd1ad8ea947169af497ee590009b8
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0972-8988&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0972-8988&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0972-8988&client=summon