Between-session reliability of subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the spine derived from optoelectronic motion capture data

• Published in: Journal of biomechanics Vol. 112; p. 110044
• Main Authors: Burkhart, Katelyn, Grindle, Daniel, Bouxsein, Mary L., Anderson, Dennis E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Ltd 09.11.2020; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Ankle; Back pain; Biomechanical Phenomena; Correlation coefficients; Curvature; Error analysis; Hip joint; Humans; Investigations; Markers; Middle Aged; Model scaling; Motion analysis; Motion capture; Musculoskeletal model; Optoelectronics; Pelvis; Posture; Range of Motion, Articular; Reliability analysis; Repeatability; Reproducibility of Results; Rotation; Spine; Spine loading; Standard error; Vertebrae; Young Adult; Repeatability; Model scaling; Spine loading; Musculoskeletal model; Motion analysis
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110044
• ISSN: 0021-9290; 1873-2380

This study evaluated the between-session reliability of creating subject-specific musculoskeletal models with optoelectronic motion capture data, and using them to estimate spine loading. Nineteen healthy participants aged 24–74 years underwent the same set of measurements on two separate occasions. Retroreflective markers were placed on anatomical regions, including C7, T1, T4, T5, T8, T9, T12 and L1 spinous processes, pelvis, upper and lower limbs, and head. We created full-body musculoskeletal models with detailed thoracolumbar spines, and scaled these to create subject-specific models for each individual and each session. Models were scaled from distances between markers, and spine curvature was adjusted according to marker-estimated measurements. Using these models, we estimated vertebral compressive loading for five different standardized postures: neutral standing, 45˚ trunk flexion, 15˚ trunk extension, 20˚ lateral bend to the right, and 45˚ axial rotation to the right. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of measurement were calculated as measures of between-session reliability and measurement error, respectively. Spine curvature measures showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.79–0.91) and body scaling segments showed fair to excellent reliability (ICC = 0.46–0.95). We found that musculoskeletal models showed mostly excellent between-session reliability to estimate spine loading, with 91% of ICC values > 0.75 for all activities. This information is a necessary precursor for using motion capture data to estimate spine loading from subject-specific musculoskeletal models, and suggests that marker data will deliver reproducible subject-specific models and estimates of spine loading.