Effect of surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and evaluation of their microhardness
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), G...
Saved in:
Published in | European Oral Research Vol. 54; no. 1; pp. 1 - 8 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Turkey
Istanbul University Press
01.01.2020
İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry Istanbul University |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values.
Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups.
No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values.
Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials. |
---|---|
AbstractList | PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. MATERIALS AND METHODSSixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. RESULTSNo significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. CONCLUSIONUsing the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Materials and Methods Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. Results No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Conclusion Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Materials and Methods Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. Results No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Conclusion Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials. Keywords: Roughness; microhardness; resin composite; surface sealant; mechanical properties The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Materials and Methods Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. Results No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Conclusion Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Gurbuz, Ozge Cilingir, Aylin Dikmen, Benin Ozsoy, Alev Mert Eren, Meltem |
AuthorAffiliation | Klinik Bilimler Bölümü, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Klinik Bilimler Bölümü, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ozge surname: Gurbuz fullname: Gurbuz, Ozge organization: Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul,Turkey – sequence: 2 givenname: Aylin surname: Cilingir fullname: Cilingir, Aylin organization: Trakya University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Edirne, Turkey – sequence: 3 givenname: Benin surname: Dikmen fullname: Dikmen, Benin organization: Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul,Turkey – sequence: 4 givenname: Alev surname: Ozsoy fullname: Ozsoy, Alev organization: Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul,Turkey – sequence: 5 givenname: Meltem surname: Mert Eren fullname: Mert Eren, Meltem organization: Altınbas University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul,Turkey |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518904$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptks1r20AQxUVJadI0x16LoJde5O63pEshpG5rMPTSnpfV7qy9Rta6u1Ig_31HdmJqKEIfzP7eEzPz3hZXQxygKN5TsmBKSfIZYlowwgjB-1Vxw5SkFWsYv5q_OakUlc11cZfzbkYoVbVs3xTXnEnatETcFIel92DHMvoyT8kbC2UG05sBS0M5buFcTnHabAfIeWZdQFkCpGzcH2IOI-TSDK6ER9NPZgwoRgz1IZX7YFPcmuRm9bvitTd9hrvn923x-9vy18OPav3z--rhfl1ZKflYuZYxUlNojXW2o8JLQiyImiqjjkdeMeubzlpmXdd4AZ0H5QB866QwnN8Wq5Ovi2anDynsTXrS0QR9LMS00SaNwfagGyu59Ex2zFLRqbptRN1Qa2tQ3LbeoteXk9dh6vbgLPadTH9henkyhK3exEddM8kkF2jw6dkgxT8T5FHvQ7bQ45whTlkzQanknOHjjAaHe4hDHwbQuzilAaelV1-X92tNlWjFjH48oRuDXYTBR_y5nZ31vaKqbVlNa6QW_6HwcoCLwTz5gPULQXUS4NZyTuDPjVKij7HTGDv9EjvkP_w7nTP9EjL-Fwbq1fo |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0043_1773803 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2023_12_011 crossref_primary_10_59313_jsr_a_1217343 crossref_primary_10_13168_cs_2022_0022 crossref_primary_10_3390_polym14153053 crossref_primary_10_1088_2051_672X_ad2057 crossref_primary_10_3390_polym15102250 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2020 European Oral Research. COPYRIGHT 2020 Istanbul University Press Copyright © 2020 European Oral Research 2020 European Oral Research |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2020 European Oral Research. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 Istanbul University Press – notice: Copyright © 2020 European Oral Research 2020 European Oral Research |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION IEBAR 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.26650/eor.20200020 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef Idealonline online kütüphane - Journals MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Dentistry |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Surface Sealant and mechanical properties |
EISSN | 2651-2823 2149-4592 |
Editor | İşler,Sabire |
Editor_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: İşler,Sabire |
EndPage | 8 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_8c535f25b2c14b67984781cc7e63c9fc IDEAL_164945 A616992717 10_26650_eor_20200020 32518904 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | İstanbul Türkiye |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: İstanbul – name: Türkiye |
GroupedDBID | 34H 3V. 7X7 ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ EOJEC FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HYE IAO IHR ITC NPM OBODZ OK1 PROAC RPM AAYXX CITATION M~E 5VS IEBAR IPNFZ KQ8 PGMZT RIG 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-d922071e9acdcb14f500ce4716a692207f62cf8bcc2cdb8f4ebfe6deef9d54a33 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 2630-6158 2149-2352 |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 14:58:01 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:11:53 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 08:42:56 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 16 14:37:09 EDT 2024 Wed Sep 25 17:28:40 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 24 04:20:48 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 17:08:15 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:20:40 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | microhardness surface sealant mechanical properties Roughness resin composite mechanical properties |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2020 European Oral Research. This article is licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license (). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses its use. The material cannot be used for commercial purposes. If the user remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she may not distribute the modified material. No warranties are given. The license may not give the user all of the permissions necessary for his/her intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how the material can be used. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c553t-d922071e9acdcb14f500ce4716a692207f62cf8bcc2cdb8f4ebfe6deef9d54a33 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7252534/ |
PMID | 32518904 |
PQID | 2411533215 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8c535f25b2c14b67984781cc7e63c9fc pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7252534 proquest_miscellaneous_2411533215 idealonline_journals_IDEAL_164945 gale_infotracmisc_A616992717 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A616992717 crossref_primary_10_26650_eor_20200020 pubmed_primary_32518904 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2020 text: 2020-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Turkey |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Turkey – name: Istanbul, Turkey |
PublicationTitle | European Oral Research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Eur Oral Res |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Istanbul University Press İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry Istanbul University |
Publisher_xml | – name: Istanbul University Press – name: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları – name: Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry – name: Istanbul University |
SSID | ssj0002116759 ssib044736591 ssib027329082 ssj0001877887 |
Score | 2.190422 |
Snippet | The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values.... Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness... Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness... PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest idealonline gale crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | Analysis Diş Hekimliği Hardness Mechanical properties microhardness resin composite roughness surface sealant Tıp |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT3BAVLwCLTISglPUrF-Jjwu0Kgg4Uak3y57YogeyVbP7_5mxk2WDkLhwtcdS7Bnb32TG3zD2BiEs2Ki7WkYfaxWkri3i5hr8qu1t0ilkntmv38zllfp8ra8PSn1RTlihBy4Ld9aBljoJHQSsVKCYAT2OBGijkWAT5NO3sQfOFFqSUq00MzEbncmCwg25cpowkvwl3RXCTbyfdHMWN0QNKnJcbnFBZR7__Wn94KZH9FYoLP6GSP9MrDy4qS4esYcTxOTrMrVjdi8Oj9ltoSnmm8TH3V3yEPmY0xqxaeCIAvfNuW4PHYAkO9dP2XLKPacErzhyP_T8N0s4ieVwA_9JyX30iotGP2FXF-ffP1zWU7WFGrSW27q3QiDeiNZDD2Glkm4aiHh3GW9yVzICUhcABPShSyqGFE0fY7K9Vl7Kp-xo2AzxOeMIujxCRy-1iio0fRdQWNpORPDJQFuxt_MSu9tCquHQGcm6cKgLN-uiYu9JAXsh4sLODWghbrIQ9y8Lqdg7Up-jHYtaAT89PMBvJe4rtzYrY61Av7ZiJwtJ3Gmw6H59YABu2uyj-_TxfP3Fod9plUaZ2SwcDacUtiFudqNDqETYGiFWxZ4VM9nPSyLK7GyjKtYuDGgx8WXPcPMjk4G3Qgst1Yv_sVIv2X1a-fKH6YQdbe928RQx1za8ytvrFwftKSc priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Effect of surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and evaluation of their microhardness |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518904 http://www.idealonline.com.tr/IdealOnline/lookAtPublications/paperDetail.xhtml?uId=164945 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2411533215 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7252534 https://doaj.org/article/8c535f25b2c14b67984781cc7e63c9fc |
Volume | 54 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZ294CWAwLxCiyrICE4ZdvasRMfy9LV8igCiZX2ZtkTGyrRpGraK7-dGScpLeLEJQd7LMWZGc_nePwNY68QwoL2ssyEtz7LnZCZRtycgZ0UlQ4yuMgzO_-srm_yD7fy9ojJ4S5MTNoHt7iofy4v6sWPmFu5WsJoyBMbfZlfFlxyKfLRMTtGA93botPyy-lkIRZJ40rQ1kiWHbcmhiI5HvmGWEB5PII7ZXcExvdS92XahrAU2ft3a_TdRYWYrSOu-BcO_Tudci8-Xd1n93pgmU67CTxgR75-yFYdOXHahLTdroMFn7YxmRGb6hSx3645VuuhZY9kh6opm5Qyzimty7eprav0Dzc4icVDhnRJKX10d4tGP2I3V7Nvl9dZX2MhAynFJqs054gyvLZQgZvkQY7H4DFiKatiV1AcQukAOFSuDLl3wavK-6ArmVshHrOTuqn9U5Yi1LIIGK2Quc_duCodCgtdcg82KCgS9nr4xGbVUWkY3IJEtRhUixnUkrC3pICdEDFgx4Zm_d30dmBKkEIGLh2HSe7oLIkuzQIUXgnQARL2htRnyE9RK2D76wb4rsR4ZaZqorTmuJtN2NmBJPoXHHS_3DMA07t4a96_m00_Gdxt6lyizGAWhoZT4lrtm21rECARokZglbAnnZns5jXYXsKKAwM6mPhhD3pEpADvPeDZf498zk7pc3c_k87YyWa99S8QXm3cefwtgc-PX0t8zn_NzqOD_QZMFSkz |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,730,783,787,867,888,2109,27938,27939,53806,53808 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxELZKkaAceAgKCwUWCcFp87DXzvoYSqsU0opDi3qz7FkbIsgmyuPCr2fGuxuSigtc7bEU74xnvonH3zD2FiEsaC-LTHjrs9wJmWnEzRnY_qDUQQYXeWbPL9ToKv90La_3mGzfwsSifXCTTvVz2qkm32Nt5XwK3bZOrPvl_HjAJZci795it_G89tRWkk4OmNPdQmyTxpWg5EgWNbsmBiPZ6_oZ8YDyeAl3wO4IjPCFbhq1tYEp8vdvvPS9SYmoraau-BsSvVlQuRWhTh-wr-3e6sKUH531ynXg1w3ax3_e_EN2v8Gs6bCefsT2fPWYzWve43QW0uV6ESz4dBnrJHGoShFWboZjIyDyqCTbNmRZpVTMThVjfpnaqkz_0I6TWLy_SKdULUjPwmj1E3Z1enJ5PMqa9g0ZSClWWak5RwDjtYUSXD8PstcDj8FQWRWnguIQCgfAoXRFyL0LXpXeB13K3ApxyParWeWfsRRRnEUsaoXMfe56ZeFQWOiCe7BBwSBh71rdmXnN0mEwu4n6Nqhv0-o7YR9IsxshIteOA7PFN9N8ZVOAFDJw6Tj0c0fXVPQeF2DglQAdIGHvyS4MuQBUN9jmJQP-ViLTMkPVV1pzTJQTdrQjiUcXdqbfbFmWabzH0px9PBmODSayOpco09qboeVUE1f52XppEHsRWEfMlrCntf1t9tUadcIGO5a5s_HdGbS3yC7e2Nfz_175mt0dXZ6Pzfjs4vMLdkCfvv7P6ojtrxZr_xJR3Mq9imf2NzmQSAw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagSFU5FBBQUgoECcEp-7DjJD4ubVcttFUPVKq4WPbEhhVsdrWPC7-eGSdZNhWnXu2xFHvGM5_j8TeMfUAIC8rJIhHOuCS1QiYKcXMCZpiXyktvA8_s5VV2dpN-uZW3W6W-QtI-2Emv-j3tVZOfIbdyPoV-myfWv748zrnkUqT9een7D9kj3LODYuugTk6Y0_1CKJXGM0EHJFnUDJsYkOSg72bEBcrDRdwe2xUY5QvVFGtrg1Pg8N946seTEpFbTV_xPzR6N6lyK0qNn7Dv7fzq5JRfvfXK9uDPHerHey3AU7bfYNd4VIs8Yw9c9ZzNa_7jeObj5XrhDbh4GfIlsamKEV5umkNBIPKsJNsWZlnFlNROmWNuGZuqjP_Rj5NYuMeIp5Q1SM_DaPQLdjM-_XZ8ljRlHBKQUqySUnGOQMYpAyXYYerlYAAOg2JmstDlMw6-sAAcSlv41FnvstI5r0qZGiFesp1qVrlXLEY0ZxCTGiFTl9pBWVgUFqrgDozPII_Yx1Z_el6zdWg85QSda9S5bnUesc-k3Y0QkWyHhtnih25WWhcghfRcWg7D1NJ1Fb3LBchdJkB5iNgnsg1NrgBVDqZ50YDfSqRaepQNM6U4HpgjdtSRxC0Mne73W9alGy-y1Ocnp6MLjQdalUqUaW1O03DKjavcbL3UiMEItCN2i9hBbYObebWGHbG8Y52diXd70OYCy3hjY4f3HvmO7V6fjPXF-dXX12yPVr7-dXXEdlaLtXuDYG5l34Zt-xdWgkqM |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+surface+sealant+on+the+surface+roughness+of+different+composites+and+evaluation+of+their+microhardness&rft.jtitle=European+oral+research&rft.au=Gurbuz%2C+Ozge&rft.au=Cilingir%2C+Aylin&rft.au=Dikmen%2C+Benin&rft.au=Ozsoy%2C+Alev&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.eissn=2651-2823&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft_id=info:doi/10.26650%2Feor.20200020&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2630-6158&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2630-6158&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2630-6158&client=summon |