Effect of surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and evaluation of their microhardness

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), G...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean Oral Research Vol. 54; no. 1; pp. 1 - 8
Main Authors Gurbuz, Ozge, Cilingir, Aylin, Dikmen, Benin, Ozsoy, Alev, Mert Eren, Meltem
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Turkey Istanbul University Press 01.01.2020
İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları
Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry
Istanbul University
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials.
AbstractList PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. MATERIALS AND METHODSSixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. RESULTSNo significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. CONCLUSIONUsing the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials.
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Materials and Methods Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. Results No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Conclusion Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials.
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Materials and Methods Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. Results No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Conclusion Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials. Keywords: Roughness; microhardness; resin composite; surface sealant; mechanical properties
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials.
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Materials and Methods Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. Results No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Conclusion Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials.
Audience Academic
Author Gurbuz, Ozge
Cilingir, Aylin
Dikmen, Benin
Ozsoy, Alev
Mert Eren, Meltem
AuthorAffiliation Klinik Bilimler Bölümü, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Klinik Bilimler Bölümü, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ozge
  surname: Gurbuz
  fullname: Gurbuz, Ozge
  organization: Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul,Turkey
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Aylin
  surname: Cilingir
  fullname: Cilingir, Aylin
  organization: Trakya University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Edirne, Turkey
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Benin
  surname: Dikmen
  fullname: Dikmen, Benin
  organization: Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul,Turkey
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Alev
  surname: Ozsoy
  fullname: Ozsoy, Alev
  organization: Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul,Turkey
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Meltem
  surname: Mert Eren
  fullname: Mert Eren, Meltem
  organization: Altınbas University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul,Turkey
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518904$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptks1r20AQxUVJadI0x16LoJde5O63pEshpG5rMPTSnpfV7qy9Rta6u1Ig_31HdmJqKEIfzP7eEzPz3hZXQxygKN5TsmBKSfIZYlowwgjB-1Vxw5SkFWsYv5q_OakUlc11cZfzbkYoVbVs3xTXnEnatETcFIel92DHMvoyT8kbC2UG05sBS0M5buFcTnHabAfIeWZdQFkCpGzcH2IOI-TSDK6ER9NPZgwoRgz1IZX7YFPcmuRm9bvitTd9hrvn923x-9vy18OPav3z--rhfl1ZKflYuZYxUlNojXW2o8JLQiyImiqjjkdeMeubzlpmXdd4AZ0H5QB866QwnN8Wq5Ovi2anDynsTXrS0QR9LMS00SaNwfagGyu59Ex2zFLRqbptRN1Qa2tQ3LbeoteXk9dh6vbgLPadTH9henkyhK3exEddM8kkF2jw6dkgxT8T5FHvQ7bQ45whTlkzQanknOHjjAaHe4hDHwbQuzilAaelV1-X92tNlWjFjH48oRuDXYTBR_y5nZ31vaKqbVlNa6QW_6HwcoCLwTz5gPULQXUS4NZyTuDPjVKij7HTGDv9EjvkP_w7nTP9EjL-Fwbq1fo
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0043_1773803
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2023_12_011
crossref_primary_10_59313_jsr_a_1217343
crossref_primary_10_13168_cs_2022_0022
crossref_primary_10_3390_polym14153053
crossref_primary_10_1088_2051_672X_ad2057
crossref_primary_10_3390_polym15102250
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2020 European Oral Research.
COPYRIGHT 2020 Istanbul University Press
Copyright © 2020 European Oral Research 2020 European Oral Research
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2020 European Oral Research.
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 Istanbul University Press
– notice: Copyright © 2020 European Oral Research 2020 European Oral Research
DBID NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
IEBAR
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.26650/eor.20200020
DatabaseName PubMed
CrossRef
Idealonline online kütüphane - Journals
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic



PubMed

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Dentistry
DocumentTitleAlternate Surface Sealant and mechanical properties
EISSN 2651-2823
2149-4592
Editor İşler,Sabire
Editor_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: İşler,Sabire
EndPage 8
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_8c535f25b2c14b67984781cc7e63c9fc
IDEAL_164945
A616992717
10_26650_eor_20200020
32518904
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations İstanbul
Türkiye
GeographicLocations_xml – name: İstanbul
– name: Türkiye
GroupedDBID 34H
3V.
7X7
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BCNDV
BENPR
BPHCQ
EOJEC
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
IAO
IHR
ITC
NPM
OBODZ
OK1
PROAC
RPM
AAYXX
CITATION
M~E
5VS
IEBAR
IPNFZ
KQ8
PGMZT
RIG
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-d922071e9acdcb14f500ce4716a692207f62cf8bcc2cdb8f4ebfe6deef9d54a33
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 2630-6158
2149-2352
IngestDate Tue Oct 22 14:58:01 EDT 2024
Tue Sep 17 21:11:53 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 25 08:42:56 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 16 14:37:09 EDT 2024
Wed Sep 25 17:28:40 EDT 2024
Tue Sep 24 04:20:48 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 26 17:08:15 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 08:20:40 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords microhardness
surface sealant
mechanical properties
Roughness
resin composite
mechanical
properties
Language English
License Copyright © 2020 European Oral Research.
This article is licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license (). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses its use. The material cannot be used for commercial purposes. If the user remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she may not distribute the modified material. No warranties are given. The license may not give the user all of the permissions necessary for his/her intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how the material can be used.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c553t-d922071e9acdcb14f500ce4716a692207f62cf8bcc2cdb8f4ebfe6deef9d54a33
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7252534/
PMID 32518904
PQID 2411533215
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8c535f25b2c14b67984781cc7e63c9fc
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7252534
proquest_miscellaneous_2411533215
idealonline_journals_IDEAL_164945
gale_infotracmisc_A616992717
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A616992717
crossref_primary_10_26650_eor_20200020
pubmed_primary_32518904
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Turkey
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Turkey
– name: Istanbul, Turkey
PublicationTitle European Oral Research
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur Oral Res
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Istanbul University Press
İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları
Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry
Istanbul University
Publisher_xml – name: Istanbul University Press
– name: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları
– name: Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry
– name: Istanbul University
SSID ssj0002116759
ssib044736591
ssib027329082
ssj0001877887
Score 2.190422
Snippet The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values....
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness...
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness...
PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
idealonline
gale
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Analysis
Diş Hekimliği
Hardness
Mechanical properties
microhardness
resin composite
roughness
surface sealant
Tıp
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT3BAVLwCLTISglPUrF-Jjwu0Kgg4Uak3y57YogeyVbP7_5mxk2WDkLhwtcdS7Bnb32TG3zD2BiEs2Ki7WkYfaxWkri3i5hr8qu1t0ilkntmv38zllfp8ra8PSn1RTlihBy4Ld9aBljoJHQSsVKCYAT2OBGijkWAT5NO3sQfOFFqSUq00MzEbncmCwg25cpowkvwl3RXCTbyfdHMWN0QNKnJcbnFBZR7__Wn94KZH9FYoLP6GSP9MrDy4qS4esYcTxOTrMrVjdi8Oj9ltoSnmm8TH3V3yEPmY0xqxaeCIAvfNuW4PHYAkO9dP2XLKPacErzhyP_T8N0s4ieVwA_9JyX30iotGP2FXF-ffP1zWU7WFGrSW27q3QiDeiNZDD2Glkm4aiHh3GW9yVzICUhcABPShSyqGFE0fY7K9Vl7Kp-xo2AzxOeMIujxCRy-1iio0fRdQWNpORPDJQFuxt_MSu9tCquHQGcm6cKgLN-uiYu9JAXsh4sLODWghbrIQ9y8Lqdg7Up-jHYtaAT89PMBvJe4rtzYrY61Av7ZiJwtJ3Gmw6H59YABu2uyj-_TxfP3Fod9plUaZ2SwcDacUtiFudqNDqETYGiFWxZ4VM9nPSyLK7GyjKtYuDGgx8WXPcPMjk4G3Qgst1Yv_sVIv2X1a-fKH6YQdbe928RQx1za8ytvrFwftKSc
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Effect of surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and evaluation of their microhardness
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518904
http://www.idealonline.com.tr/IdealOnline/lookAtPublications/paperDetail.xhtml?uId=164945
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2411533215
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7252534
https://doaj.org/article/8c535f25b2c14b67984781cc7e63c9fc
Volume 54
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZ294CWAwLxCiyrICE4ZdvasRMfy9LV8igCiZX2ZtkTGyrRpGraK7-dGScpLeLEJQd7LMWZGc_nePwNY68QwoL2ssyEtz7LnZCZRtycgZ0UlQ4yuMgzO_-srm_yD7fy9ojJ4S5MTNoHt7iofy4v6sWPmFu5WsJoyBMbfZlfFlxyKfLRMTtGA93botPyy-lkIRZJ40rQ1kiWHbcmhiI5HvmGWEB5PII7ZXcExvdS92XahrAU2ft3a_TdRYWYrSOu-BcO_Tudci8-Xd1n93pgmU67CTxgR75-yFYdOXHahLTdroMFn7YxmRGb6hSx3645VuuhZY9kh6opm5Qyzimty7eprav0Dzc4icVDhnRJKX10d4tGP2I3V7Nvl9dZX2MhAynFJqs054gyvLZQgZvkQY7H4DFiKatiV1AcQukAOFSuDLl3wavK-6ArmVshHrOTuqn9U5Yi1LIIGK2Quc_duCodCgtdcg82KCgS9nr4xGbVUWkY3IJEtRhUixnUkrC3pICdEDFgx4Zm_d30dmBKkEIGLh2HSe7oLIkuzQIUXgnQARL2htRnyE9RK2D76wb4rsR4ZaZqorTmuJtN2NmBJPoXHHS_3DMA07t4a96_m00_Gdxt6lyizGAWhoZT4lrtm21rECARokZglbAnnZns5jXYXsKKAwM6mPhhD3pEpADvPeDZf498zk7pc3c_k87YyWa99S8QXm3cefwtgc-PX0t8zn_NzqOD_QZMFSkz
link.rule.ids 230,315,730,783,787,867,888,2109,27938,27939,53806,53808
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxELZKkaAceAgKCwUWCcFp87DXzvoYSqsU0opDi3qz7FkbIsgmyuPCr2fGuxuSigtc7bEU74xnvonH3zD2FiEsaC-LTHjrs9wJmWnEzRnY_qDUQQYXeWbPL9ToKv90La_3mGzfwsSifXCTTvVz2qkm32Nt5XwK3bZOrPvl_HjAJZci795it_G89tRWkk4OmNPdQmyTxpWg5EgWNbsmBiPZ6_oZ8YDyeAl3wO4IjPCFbhq1tYEp8vdvvPS9SYmoraau-BsSvVlQuRWhTh-wr-3e6sKUH531ynXg1w3ax3_e_EN2v8Gs6bCefsT2fPWYzWve43QW0uV6ESz4dBnrJHGoShFWboZjIyDyqCTbNmRZpVTMThVjfpnaqkz_0I6TWLy_SKdULUjPwmj1E3Z1enJ5PMqa9g0ZSClWWak5RwDjtYUSXD8PstcDj8FQWRWnguIQCgfAoXRFyL0LXpXeB13K3ApxyParWeWfsRRRnEUsaoXMfe56ZeFQWOiCe7BBwSBh71rdmXnN0mEwu4n6Nqhv0-o7YR9IsxshIteOA7PFN9N8ZVOAFDJw6Tj0c0fXVPQeF2DglQAdIGHvyS4MuQBUN9jmJQP-ViLTMkPVV1pzTJQTdrQjiUcXdqbfbFmWabzH0px9PBmODSayOpco09qboeVUE1f52XppEHsRWEfMlrCntf1t9tUadcIGO5a5s_HdGbS3yC7e2Nfz_175mt0dXZ6Pzfjs4vMLdkCfvv7P6ojtrxZr_xJR3Mq9imf2NzmQSAw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagSFU5FBBQUgoECcEp-7DjJD4ubVcttFUPVKq4WPbEhhVsdrWPC7-eGSdZNhWnXu2xFHvGM5_j8TeMfUAIC8rJIhHOuCS1QiYKcXMCZpiXyktvA8_s5VV2dpN-uZW3W6W-QtI-2Emv-j3tVZOfIbdyPoV-myfWv748zrnkUqT9een7D9kj3LODYuugTk6Y0_1CKJXGM0EHJFnUDJsYkOSg72bEBcrDRdwe2xUY5QvVFGtrg1Pg8N946seTEpFbTV_xPzR6N6lyK0qNn7Dv7fzq5JRfvfXK9uDPHerHey3AU7bfYNd4VIs8Yw9c9ZzNa_7jeObj5XrhDbh4GfIlsamKEV5umkNBIPKsJNsWZlnFlNROmWNuGZuqjP_Rj5NYuMeIp5Q1SM_DaPQLdjM-_XZ8ljRlHBKQUqySUnGOQMYpAyXYYerlYAAOg2JmstDlMw6-sAAcSlv41FnvstI5r0qZGiFesp1qVrlXLEY0ZxCTGiFTl9pBWVgUFqrgDozPII_Yx1Z_el6zdWg85QSda9S5bnUesc-k3Y0QkWyHhtnih25WWhcghfRcWg7D1NJ1Fb3LBchdJkB5iNgnsg1NrgBVDqZ50YDfSqRaepQNM6U4HpgjdtSRxC0Mne73W9alGy-y1Ocnp6MLjQdalUqUaW1O03DKjavcbL3UiMEItCN2i9hBbYObebWGHbG8Y52diXd70OYCy3hjY4f3HvmO7V6fjPXF-dXX12yPVr7-dXXEdlaLtXuDYG5l34Zt-xdWgkqM
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+surface+sealant+on+the+surface+roughness+of+different+composites+and+evaluation+of+their+microhardness&rft.jtitle=European+oral+research&rft.au=Gurbuz%2C+Ozge&rft.au=Cilingir%2C+Aylin&rft.au=Dikmen%2C+Benin&rft.au=Ozsoy%2C+Alev&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.eissn=2651-2823&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft_id=info:doi/10.26650%2Feor.20200020&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2630-6158&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2630-6158&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2630-6158&client=summon