Scope and Consistency of Outcomes Reported in Randomized Trials Conducted in Adults Receiving Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review

• Published in: American journal of kidney diseases Vol. 72; no. 1; pp. 62 - 74
• Main Authors: Sautenet, Bénédicte, Tong, Allison, Williams, Gabrielle, Hemmelgarn, Brenda R., Manns, Braden, Wheeler, David C., Tugwell, Peter, van Biesen, Wim, Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C., Crowe, Sally, Harris, Tess, Evangelidis, Nicole, Hawley, Carmel M., Pollock, Carol, Johnson, David W., Polkinghorne, Kevan R., Howard, Kirsten, Gallagher, Martin P., Kerr, Peter G., McDonald, Stephen P., Ju, Angela, Craig, Jonathan C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2018; Elsevier
• Subjects: core outcomes; Hemodialysis; Life Sciences; nephrology; outcomes; patient-centered outcomes; study quality; surrogate outcome; systematic review; nephrology; patient-centered outcomes; core outcomes; Hemodialysis; outcomes; surrogate outcome; study quality; systematic review; Humans; Kidney Failure; Review; Outcome Assessment; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Chronic; Health Care; Adult; Renal Dialysis

Clinical trials are most informative for evidence-based decision making when they consistently measure and report outcomes of relevance to stakeholders. We aimed to assess the scope and consistency of outcomes reported in trials for hemodialysis. Systematic review. Adults requiring maintenance hemod...