Effect of population breast screening on breast cancer mortality up to 2005 in England and Wales: an individual-level cohort study
Background: Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of cancer Vol. 116; no. 2; pp. 246 - 252 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
17.01.2017
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background:
Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality.
Methods:
We followed 988 090 women aged 49–64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated.
Results:
Invitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991–2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73–0.84,
P
<0·001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51–0·57,
P
<0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63–0·73,
P
<0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen.
Conclusions:
The results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background: Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality. Methods: We followed 988 090 women aged 49-64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated. Results: Invitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991-2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84, P<0.001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51-0.57, P<0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.73, P<0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen. Conclusions: The results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms. Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality.BACKGROUNDPopulation breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality.We followed 988 090 women aged 49-64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated.METHODSWe followed 988 090 women aged 49-64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated.Invitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991-2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84, P<0·001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51-0·57, P<0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0·73, P<0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen.RESULTSInvitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991-2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84, P<0·001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51-0·57, P<0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0·73, P<0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen.The results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms.CONCLUSIONSThe results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms. Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality. We followed 988 090 women aged 49-64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated. Invitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991-2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84, P<0·001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51-0·57, P<0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0·73, P<0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen. The results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms. Background:Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality.Methods:We followed 988 090 women aged 49-64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated.Results:Invitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991-2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84, P<0·001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51-0·57, P<0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0·73, P<0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen.Conclusions:The results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms. Background: Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality. Methods: We followed 988 090 women aged 49–64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated. Results: Invitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991–2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73–0.84, P <0·001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51–0·57, P <0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63–0·73, P <0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen. Conclusions: The results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms. |
Author | Coleman, Derek A Johns, Louise E Swerdlow, Anthony J Moss, Susan M |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Louise E surname: Johns fullname: Johns, Louise E email: louise.johns@icr.ac.uk organization: Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research – sequence: 2 givenname: Derek A surname: Coleman fullname: Coleman, Derek A organization: Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research – sequence: 3 givenname: Anthony J surname: Swerdlow fullname: Swerdlow, Anthony J organization: Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research – sequence: 4 givenname: Susan M surname: Moss fullname: Moss, Susan M organization: Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventative Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27931047$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNks9rFDEUx4NU7LZ68ywBLx6cNT8nEw-ClK0KBS-Kx5DJZLZZssmYZBb26l9utltrLQoeQn68z_vyXt73DJyEGCwAzzFaYkS7N_3GLAnC7ZJh_ggsMKekwR0RJ2CBEBINkgSdgrOcN_UqUSeegFMiJMWIiQX4sRpHawqMI5ziNHtdXAywT1bnArNJ1gYX1vD3m9HB2AS3MRXtXdnDeYIlQoIQhy7AVVh7HQZ4WN-0t_ltPdbA4HZumLVvvN1ZD028rgIwl3nYPwWPR-2zfXa7n4Ovl6svFx-bq88fPl28v2oMZ7I0PZMCDS01Y89Iz7SwhOqhlRhJQzorhMF9RzFuJRN4EK0c2MCxxlwzI_qe0HPw7qg7zf3WDsaGkrRXU3JbnfYqaqf-jAR3rdZxpzhhVMq2Cry6FUjx-2xzUVuXjfW1YRvnrHDXdpRyydF_oEx0knf0oPryAbqJcwr1JyrFJWNYCFypF_eLv6v61yQr8PoImBRzTna8QzBSB6OoahR1MIqqRqk4eYAbV26GX1t3_l9JzTEpV-2wtuleqX_jfwKCatAP |
CODEN | BJCAAI |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2017_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1093_jbi_wbz059 crossref_primary_10_1177_0300891618792439 crossref_primary_10_2147_CLEP_S267584 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_33204 crossref_primary_10_1111_ecc_12876 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers12040976 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_31904 crossref_primary_10_1177_0969141317713232 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_019_05330_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_33506 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_024_03258_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12282_021_01315_z crossref_primary_10_4178_epih_e2017021 crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_32859 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpobgyn_2021_11_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esmoop_2021_100111 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_maturitas_2020_02_007 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgh_2020_002466 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2023_076962 crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2017_101 crossref_primary_10_1093_ije_dyaa029 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_31832 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ro_2018_08_002 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41416_020_01163_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2022_01_053 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinepi_2024_111426 crossref_primary_10_1080_13697137_2017_1392503 crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_5004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2022_11_012 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0202385 crossref_primary_10_1136_bjophthalmol_2020_318407 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2021_106869 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2019_12_010 crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_31195 crossref_primary_10_1158_1055_9965_EPI_21_0152 |
Cites_doi | 10.1080/02841850701501725 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600301 10.1038/bjc.2014.642 10.1136/bmj.38313.639236.82 10.1136/jms.6.4.209 10.1136/jms.8.3.152 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0349 10.1016/j.crad.2005.01.008 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.232 10.1002/cncr.21823 10.1038/bjc.1994.342 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70380-7 10.1136/jms.8.3.125 10.1258/jms.2012.012079 10.1258/jms.2012.012080 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604123 10.1093/annonc/mdq447 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604532 10.1016/S1359-6349(06)80008-X 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090342 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0320 10.1186/bcr3427 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.472 10.1002/ijc.29925 10.1177/0969141315623980 10.1002/cncr.10765 10.1136/bmj.308.6937.1125 10.1258/0969141042467304 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0803 10.1136/bmj.315.7118.1266 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.665 10.1056/NEJMsr1504363 10.1136/bmj.g3701 10.1056/NEJMoa1000727 10.1258/096914105775220732 10.1186/bcr3090 10.1258/jms.2009.009094 10.1258/jms.2012.012078 10.1093/jnci/dji057 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2017 Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jan 17, 2017 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) 2017 The Author(s) |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2017 – notice: Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jan 17, 2017 – notice: Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) 2017 The Author(s) |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7RV 7TO 7U9 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AN0 AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. KB0 LK8 M0S M1P M7P NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1038/bjc.2016.415 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals (WRLC) CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Public Health Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland British Nursing Database ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Biological Science Database ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Central Student Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Public Health Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition British Nursing Index with Full Text ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE ProQuest Central Student |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals (WRLC) url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Cohort evaluation of the NHSBSP |
EISSN | 1532-1827 |
EndPage | 252 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC5243996 4303589701 27931047 10_1038_bjc_2016_415 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United Kingdom--UK England Wales |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Wales – name: England – name: United Kingdom--UK |
GroupedDBID | --- -Q- 0R~ 23N 36B 39C 3V. 4.4 406 53G 5GY 5RE 6J9 70F 7RV 7X7 88E 8AO 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 AACDK AANZL AASML AATNV AAWTL AAYZH AAZLF ABAKF ABLJU ABOCM ABUWG ABZZP ACAOD ACGFO ACGFS ACKTT ACPRK ACRQY ACZOJ ADBBV ADFRT ADHDB AEFQL AEJRE AEMSY AENEX AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFKRA AFRAH AFSHS AGAYW AGHAI AGQEE AHMBA AHSBF AIGIU AILAN AJRNO ALFFA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMYLF AN0 AOIJS ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN BAWUL BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BKEYQ BKKNO BNQBC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DNIVK DPUIP DU5 E3Z EAP EBLON EBS EE. EIOEI EJD EMB ESX EX3 F5P FDQFY FEDTE FERAY FIGPU FIZPM FRJ FSGXE FYUFA GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HVGLF HYE HZ~ IH2 IWAJR JSO JZLTJ KQ8 M1P M7P NAO NAPCQ NQJWS O9- OK1 P2P PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X RNT RNTTT ROL RPM SNX SNYQT SOHCF SOJ SRMVM SWTZT TAOOD TBHMF TDRGL TR2 UKHRP W2D WH7 WOW ~02 AAFWJ AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACMFV ACSTC AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TO 7U9 7XB 8FE 8FH 8FK ABRTQ AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ H94 K9. LK8 PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-b4970d63cfb42b4a7e23ad69109c28e77c1b831169471d769d4d51a15a4c7bb23 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 13:53:54 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 01:57:22 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 02:23:19 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 08:57:38 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:35:23 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:29:44 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:00:17 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:39:47 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | evaluation mortality individual-level breast cancer incidence-based mortality population screening |
Language | English |
License | This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c549t-b4970d63cfb42b4a7e23ad69109c28e77c1b831169471d769d4d51a15a4c7bb23 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.nature.com/articles/bjc.2016.415 |
PMID | 27931047 |
PQID | 1859441771 |
PQPubID | 41855 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5243996 proquest_miscellaneous_1868335950 proquest_miscellaneous_1847895836 proquest_journals_1859441771 pubmed_primary_27931047 crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2016_415 crossref_citationtrail_10_1038_bjc_2016_415 springer_journals_10_1038_bjc_2016_415 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-01-17 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-01-17 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2017 text: 2017-01-17 day: 17 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
PublicationTitle | British journal of cancer |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Br J Cancer |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Br J Cancer |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK Nature Publishing Group |
Publisher_xml | – name: Nature Publishing Group UK – name: Nature Publishing Group |
References | Gabe, Tryggvadottir, Sigfusson, Olafsdottir, Sigurdsson, Duffy (CR14) 2007; 48 Paci, Broeders, Hofvind, Puliti, Duffy (CR30) 2014; 23 Weedon-Fekjaer, Romundstad, Vatten (CR41) 2014; 348 Duffy, Tabar, Chen, Holmqvist, Yen, Abdsalah, Epstein, Frodis, Ljungberg, Hedborg-Melander, Sundbom, Tholin, Wiege, Akerlund, Wu, Tung, Chiu, Chiu, Huang, Smith, Rosen, Stenbeck, Holmberg (CR11) 2002; 95 Jorgensen, Gotzsche (CR20) 2016; 13 Njor, Nystrom, Moss, Paci, Broeders, Segnan, Lynge (CR27) 2012; 19 Olsen, Njor, Vejborg, Schwartz, Dalgaard, Jensen, Tange, Blichert-Toft, Rank, Mouridsen, Lynge (CR28) 2005; 330 CR16 Jonsson, Nystrom, Tornberg, Lenner (CR18) 2001; 8 Lauby-Secretan, Scoccianti, Loomis, Benbrahim-Tallaa, Bouvard, Bianchini, Straif (CR22) 2015; 372 (CR39) 2006; 15 Michalopoulos, Duffy (CR24) 2016; 23 Fielder, Warwick, Brook, Gower-Thomas, Cuzick, Monypenny, Duffy (CR13) 2004; 11 Paap, Verbeek, Puliti, Paci, Broeders (CR29) 2011; 22 Phillimore, Beattie, Townsend (CR33) 1994; 308 Stockton, Davies, Day, McCann (CR37) 1997; 314 Moss, Nystrom, Jonsson, Paci, Lynge, Njor, Broeders (CR26) 2012; 19 Parvinen, Heinavaara, Anttila, Helenius, Klemi, Pylkkanen (CR32) 2015; 112 Puliti, Miccinesi, Zappa, Manneschi, Crocetti, Paci (CR35) 2012; 14 Blanks, Moss, McGahan, Quinn, Babb (CR5) 2000; 321 Wilson, Evans (CR43) 2006; 4 Allgood, Warwick, Warren, Day, Duffy (CR2) 2008; 98 Hakama, Pukkala, Soderman, Day (CR15) 1999; 6 Alexander, Anderson, Brown, Forrest, Hepburn, Kirkpatrick, McDonald, Muir, Prescott, Shepherd (CR1) 1994; 70 Broeders, Moss, Nystrom, Njor, Jonsson, Paap, Massat, Duffy, Lynge, Paci (CR7) 2012; 19 Duffy, Tabar, Olsen, Vitak, Allgood, Chen, Yen, Smith (CR12) 2010; 17 Kalager, Zelen, Langmark, Adami (CR21) 2010; 363 Massat, Dibden, Parmar, Cuzick, Sasieni, Duffy (CR23) 2016; 25 Swerdlow, Jones (CR40) 2005; 97 CR8 (CR17) 2012; 380 Duffy, Parmar (CR10) 2013; 15 Paci, Duffy, Giorgi, Zappa, Crocetti, Vezzosi, Bianchi, del Turco (CR31) 2002; 87 Puliti, Miccinesi, Collina, De Lisi, Federico, Ferretti, Finarelli, Foca, Mangone, Naldoni, Petrella, Ponti, Segnan, Sigona, Zarcone, Zorzi, Zappa, Paci (CR34) 2008; 99 Biesheuvel, Barratt, Howard, Houssami, Irwig (CR3) 2007; 8 Richardson (CR36) 2001; 8 Duffy, Cuzick (CR9) 2002; 51 Blanks, Bennett, Patnick, Cush, Davison, Moss (CR4) 2005; 60 Bleyer, Baines, Miller (CR6) 2016; 138 Weedon-Fekjaer, Vatten, Aalen, Lindqvist, Tretli (CR42) 2005; 12 Jorgensen, Gotzsche (CR19) 2010; 103 Moritz, Bates, Henderson, Humphreys, Michell (CR25) 1997; 315 Svendsen, Olsen, von Euler-Chelpin, Lynge (CR38) 2006; 106 A Bleyer (BFbjc2016415_CR6) 2016; 138 RM Wilson (BFbjc2016415_CR43) 2006; 4 M Broeders (BFbjc2016415_CR7) 2012; 19 B Lauby-Secretan (BFbjc2016415_CR22) 2015; 372 HM Fielder (BFbjc2016415_CR13) 2004; 11 AL Svendsen (BFbjc2016415_CR38) 2006; 106 Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening (BFbjc2016415_CR17) 2012; 380 BFbjc2016415_CR16 RG Blanks (BFbjc2016415_CR4) 2005; 60 M Hakama (BFbjc2016415_CR15) 1999; 6 AJ Swerdlow (BFbjc2016415_CR40) 2005; 97 KJ Jorgensen (BFbjc2016415_CR19) 2010; 103 PC Allgood (BFbjc2016415_CR2) 2008; 98 H Weedon-Fekjaer (BFbjc2016415_CR41) 2014; 348 H Jonsson (BFbjc2016415_CR18) 2001; 8 E Paap (BFbjc2016415_CR29) 2011; 22 P Phillimore (BFbjc2016415_CR33) 1994; 308 AH Olsen (BFbjc2016415_CR28) 2005; 330 I Parvinen (BFbjc2016415_CR32) 2015; 112 D Puliti (BFbjc2016415_CR35) 2012; 14 SW Duffy (BFbjc2016415_CR12) 2010; 17 E Paci (BFbjc2016415_CR30) 2014; 23 D Stockton (BFbjc2016415_CR37) 1997; 314 SM Moss (BFbjc2016415_CR26) 2012; 19 KJ Jorgensen (BFbjc2016415_CR20) 2016; 13 M Kalager (BFbjc2016415_CR21) 2010; 363 H Weedon-Fekjaer (BFbjc2016415_CR42) 2005; 12 NJ Massat (BFbjc2016415_CR23) 2016; 25 C Biesheuvel (BFbjc2016415_CR3) 2007; 8 FE Alexander (BFbjc2016415_CR1) 1994; 70 D Puliti (BFbjc2016415_CR34) 2008; 99 SW Duffy (BFbjc2016415_CR9) 2002; 51 S Njor (BFbjc2016415_CR27) 2012; 19 E Paci (BFbjc2016415_CR31) 2002; 87 D Michalopoulos (BFbjc2016415_CR24) 2016; 23 R Gabe (BFbjc2016415_CR14) 2007; 48 Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group (BFbjc2016415_CR39) 2006; 15 A Richardson (BFbjc2016415_CR36) 2001; 8 SW Duffy (BFbjc2016415_CR10) 2013; 15 SW Duffy (BFbjc2016415_CR11) 2002; 95 S Moritz (BFbjc2016415_CR25) 1997; 315 RG Blanks (BFbjc2016415_CR5) 2000; 321 BFbjc2016415_CR8 28399111 - Br J Cancer. 2017 Jul 11;117(2):e2 |
References_xml | – volume: 48 start-page: 948 issue: 9 year: 2007 end-page: 955 ident: CR14 article-title: A case-control study to estimate the impact of the Icelandic population-based mammography screening program on breast cancer death publication-title: Acta Radiol doi: 10.1080/02841850701501725 – volume: 87 start-page: 65 issue: 1 year: 2002 end-page: 69 ident: CR31 article-title: Quantification of the effect of mammographic screening on fatal breast cancers: The Florence Programme 1990-96 publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600301 – volume: 112 start-page: 918 issue: 5 year: 2015 end-page: 924 ident: CR32 article-title: Mammography screening in three Finnish residential areas: comprehensive population-based study of breast cancer incidence and incidence-based mortality 1976-2009 publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.642 – volume: 330 start-page: 220 issue: 7485 year: 2005 ident: CR28 article-title: Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: cohort study publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.38313.639236.82 – volume: 6 start-page: 209 issue: 4 year: 1999 end-page: 216 ident: CR15 article-title: Implementation of screening as a public health policy: issues in design and evaluation publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1136/jms.6.4.209 – volume: 8 start-page: 152 issue: 3 year: 2001 end-page: 160 ident: CR18 article-title: Service screening with mammography of women aged 50-69 years in Sweden: effects on mortality from breast cancer publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1136/jms.8.3.152 – volume: 15 start-page: 45 issue: 1 year: 2006 end-page: 51 ident: CR39 article-title: Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0349 – ident: CR16 – volume: 60 start-page: 674 issue: 6 year: 2005 end-page: 680 ident: CR4 article-title: The effect of changing from one to two views at incident (subsequent) screens in the NHS breast screening programme in England: impact on cancer detection and recall rates publication-title: Clin Radiol doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.01.008 – volume: 13 start-page: 139 issue: 3 year: 2016 end-page: 140 ident: CR20 article-title: Breast cancer: Updated screening guidelines—much ado about small improvements publication-title: Nat Rev Clin Oncol doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.232 – volume: 106 start-page: 1883 issue: 9 year: 2006 end-page: 1890 ident: CR38 article-title: Breast cancer incidence after the introduction of mammography screening: what should be expected? publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.21823 – volume: 70 start-page: 542 issue: 3 year: 1994 end-page: 548 ident: CR1 article-title: The Edinburgh randomised trial of breast cancer screening: results after 10 years of follow-up publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.342 – volume: 8 start-page: 1129 issue: 12 year: 2007 end-page: 1138 ident: CR3 article-title: Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review publication-title: Lancet Oncol doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70380-7 – volume: 8 start-page: 125 issue: 3 year: 2001 end-page: 127 ident: CR36 article-title: Screening and the number needed to treat publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1136/jms.8.3.125 – volume: 19 start-page: 26 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2012 end-page: 32 ident: CR26 article-title: The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of trend studies publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012079 – volume: 19 start-page: 33 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2012 end-page: 41 ident: CR27 article-title: Breast cancer mortality in mammographic screening in Europe: a review of incidence-based mortality studies publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012080 – volume: 98 start-page: 206 issue: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 209 ident: CR2 article-title: A case-control study of the impact of the East Anglian breast screening programme on breast cancer mortality publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604123 – volume: 22 start-page: 863 issue: 4 year: 2011 end-page: 869 ident: CR29 article-title: Breast cancer screening case-control study design: impact on breast cancer mortality publication-title: Ann Oncol doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq447 – volume: 99 start-page: 423 issue: 3 year: 2008 end-page: 427 ident: CR34 article-title: Effectiveness of service screening: a case-control study to assess breast cancer mortality reduction publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604532 – volume: 4 start-page: 6 issue: 2 year: 2006 end-page: 9 ident: CR43 article-title: Over-diagnosis and breast cancer screening publication-title: Eur J Cancer doi: 10.1016/S1359-6349(06)80008-X – ident: CR8 – volume: 51 start-page: 235 issue: 2 year: 2002 end-page: 243 ident: CR9 article-title: Correcting for non-compliance bias in case-control studies to evaluate cancer screening programmes publication-title: Appl Stat – volume: 103 start-page: 14 issue: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 20 ident: CR19 article-title: Who evaluates public health programmes? A review of the NHS Breast Screening Programme publication-title: J R Soc Med doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090342 – volume: 380 start-page: 1778 issue: 9855 year: 2012 end-page: 1786 ident: CR17 article-title: The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0 – volume: 23 start-page: 1159 issue: 7 year: 2014 end-page: 1163 ident: CR30 article-title: European breast cancer service screening outcomes: a first balance sheet of the benefits and harms publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0320 – volume: 15 start-page: R41 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: CR10 article-title: Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: the importance of length of observation period and lead time publication-title: Breast Cancer Res doi: 10.1186/bcr3427 – volume: 314 start-page: 472 issue: 7079 year: 1997 end-page: 475 ident: CR37 article-title: Retrospective study of reasons for improved survival in patients with breast cancer in east Anglia: earlier diagnosis or better treatment publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.472 – volume: 138 start-page: 2003 issue: 8 year: 2016 end-page: 2012 ident: CR6 article-title: Impact of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality publication-title: Int J Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.29925 – volume: 23 start-page: 192 issue: 4 year: 2016 end-page: 202 ident: CR24 article-title: Estimation of overdiagnosis using short-term trends and lead time estimates uncontaminated by overdiagnosed cases: Results from the Norwegian Breast Screening Programme publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1177/0969141315623980 – volume: 95 start-page: 458 issue: 3 year: 2002 end-page: 469 ident: CR11 article-title: The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.10765 – volume: 308 start-page: 1125 issue: 6937 year: 1994 end-page: 1128 ident: CR33 article-title: Widening inequality of health in northern England, 1981-91 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6937.1125 – volume: 11 start-page: 194 issue: 4 year: 2004 end-page: 198 ident: CR13 article-title: A case-control study to estimate the impact on breast cancer death of the breast screening programme in Wales publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/0969141042467304 – volume: 25 start-page: 455 issue: 3 year: 2016 end-page: 462 ident: CR23 article-title: Impact of Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality: The UK Program 20 Years On publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0803 – volume: 315 start-page: 1266 issue: 7118 year: 1997 end-page: 1272 ident: CR25 article-title: Variation in management of small invasive breast cancers detected on screening in the former south east Thames region: observational study publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7118.1266 – volume: 321 start-page: 665 issue: 7262 year: 2000 end-page: 669 ident: CR5 article-title: Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.665 – volume: 372 start-page: 2353 issue: 24 year: 2015 end-page: 2358 ident: CR22 article-title: Breast-cancer screening–-viewpoint of the IARC Working Group publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1504363 – volume: 348 start-page: g3701 year: 2014 ident: CR41 article-title: Modern mammography screening and breast cancer mortality: population study publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3701 – volume: 363 start-page: 1203 issue: 13 year: 2010 end-page: 1210 ident: CR21 article-title: Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000727 – volume: 12 start-page: 172 issue: 4 year: 2005 end-page: 178 ident: CR42 article-title: Estimating mean sojourn time and screening test sensitivity in breast cancer mammography screening: new results publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/096914105775220732 – volume: 14 start-page: R9 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: CR35 article-title: Balancing harms and benefits of service mammography screening programs: a cohort study publication-title: Breast Cancer Res doi: 10.1186/bcr3090 – volume: 17 start-page: 25 issue: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 30 ident: CR12 article-title: Absolute numbers of lives saved and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening, from a randomized trial and from the Breast Screening Programme in England publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/jms.2009.009094 – volume: 19 start-page: 14 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2012 end-page: 25 ident: CR7 article-title: The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012078 – volume: 97 start-page: 375 issue: 5 year: 2005 end-page: 384 ident: CR40 article-title: Tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer and risk of endometrial cancer: a case-control study publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji057 – volume: 363 start-page: 1203 issue: 13 year: 2010 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR21 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000727 – volume: 11 start-page: 194 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR13 publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/0969141042467304 – volume: 15 start-page: R41 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR10 publication-title: Breast Cancer Res doi: 10.1186/bcr3427 – volume: 14 start-page: R9 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR35 publication-title: Breast Cancer Res doi: 10.1186/bcr3090 – volume: 308 start-page: 1125 issue: 6937 year: 1994 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR33 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6937.1125 – volume: 23 start-page: 192 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR24 publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1177/0969141315623980 – volume: 8 start-page: 125 issue: 3 year: 2001 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR36 publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1136/jms.8.3.125 – volume: 15 start-page: 45 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR39 publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0349 – volume: 8 start-page: 1129 issue: 12 year: 2007 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR3 publication-title: Lancet Oncol doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70380-7 – volume: 321 start-page: 665 issue: 7262 year: 2000 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR5 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.665 – volume: 19 start-page: 33 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2012 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR27 publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012080 – volume: 98 start-page: 206 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR2 publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604123 – volume: 138 start-page: 2003 issue: 8 year: 2016 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR6 publication-title: Int J Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.29925 – volume: 23 start-page: 1159 issue: 7 year: 2014 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR30 publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0320 – volume: 380 start-page: 1778 issue: 9855 year: 2012 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR17 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0 – volume: 97 start-page: 375 issue: 5 year: 2005 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR40 publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji057 – volume: 25 start-page: 455 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR23 publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0803 – ident: BFbjc2016415_CR8 – volume: 8 start-page: 152 issue: 3 year: 2001 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR18 publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1136/jms.8.3.152 – volume: 48 start-page: 948 issue: 9 year: 2007 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR14 publication-title: Acta Radiol doi: 10.1080/02841850701501725 – volume: 314 start-page: 472 issue: 7079 year: 1997 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR37 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.472 – volume: 60 start-page: 674 issue: 6 year: 2005 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR4 publication-title: Clin Radiol doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.01.008 – ident: BFbjc2016415_CR16 – volume: 6 start-page: 209 issue: 4 year: 1999 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR15 publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1136/jms.6.4.209 – volume: 112 start-page: 918 issue: 5 year: 2015 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR32 publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.642 – volume: 70 start-page: 542 issue: 3 year: 1994 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR1 publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.342 – volume: 51 start-page: 235 issue: 2 year: 2002 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR9 publication-title: Appl Stat – volume: 372 start-page: 2353 issue: 24 year: 2015 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR22 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1504363 – volume: 13 start-page: 139 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR20 publication-title: Nat Rev Clin Oncol doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.232 – volume: 330 start-page: 220 issue: 7485 year: 2005 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR28 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.38313.639236.82 – volume: 106 start-page: 1883 issue: 9 year: 2006 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR38 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.21823 – volume: 95 start-page: 458 issue: 3 year: 2002 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR11 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.10765 – volume: 4 start-page: 6 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR43 publication-title: Eur J Cancer doi: 10.1016/S1359-6349(06)80008-X – volume: 12 start-page: 172 issue: 4 year: 2005 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR42 publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/096914105775220732 – volume: 87 start-page: 65 issue: 1 year: 2002 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR31 publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600301 – volume: 19 start-page: 14 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2012 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR7 publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012078 – volume: 315 start-page: 1266 issue: 7118 year: 1997 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR25 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7118.1266 – volume: 22 start-page: 863 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR29 publication-title: Ann Oncol doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq447 – volume: 99 start-page: 423 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR34 publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604532 – volume: 19 start-page: 26 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2012 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR26 publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012079 – volume: 103 start-page: 14 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR19 publication-title: J R Soc Med doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090342 – volume: 348 start-page: g3701 year: 2014 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR41 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3701 – volume: 17 start-page: 25 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: BFbjc2016415_CR12 publication-title: J Med Screen doi: 10.1258/jms.2009.009094 – reference: 28399111 - Br J Cancer. 2017 Jul 11;117(2):e2 |
SSID | ssj0009087 |
Score | 2.3957827 |
Snippet | Background:
Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains... Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We... Background:Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains... Background: Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 246 |
SubjectTerms | 692/699/67/1347 692/699/67/2322 692/699/67/2324 692/700/478/2772 Adult Aged Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - mortality Cancer Research Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Drug Resistance Early Detection of Cancer - methods England - epidemiology Epidemiology Female Humans Mammography Mass Screening - methods Medical research Middle Aged Molecular Medicine Mortality Oncology Population Socioeconomic factors Wales - epidemiology Womens health |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals (WRLC) dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwELaqVkJcUHmntMhIwAUMseMnN7SiqpDKiYreItvxikUlu9pm_0B_eWecR1kKiEOkKB7HTsaPz_bMN4S8lLyMjZKJqWglkyp45oXzzCYvbIzcR43eyKdf9MmZ_HyuznfI29EXJhvtZ0rLPEyP1mHvww_kG-T6XfYo30PSdmzPMz27odgtbc-QiZtvTpSDmXtZ2a3c2xPQLVR52zjytxPSPPEc75N7A2KkH_s63ic7qX1A7pwOZ-IPyVVPQEyXc7qaonHRgMbmHYVBARaq8F568yyiotf0ZwbeAMLpZkW7JcWNH7po6RDWg-L1DaaPyw9wSxeT4xa7QDsjipF111AA0tM-ImfHn77OTtgQWYFFWA92LEhnykZXcR6kCNKbJCrfaIAOLgqbjIk82Ipz7WDuaox2jWwU91x5GU0IonpMdttlm54SynXZQF5XxaDlnEcnoyhhkcINYNEkdUHejL-7jgPtOEa_uKjz8Xdla1BOjcqpQTkFeTVJr3q6jb_IHY6aq4dOd1kD9HAYUc3wgryYkqG74BmIb9NygzLSWKdspf8lo9EVzamyIE_6xjBVRsB4huwWBTFbzWQSQLru7ZR28T3TdiuBaz8o9_XYoH6p-h--8eB_BZ-RuwLBRskZN4dkt1tv0hFApS48zz3kGjtBEYQ priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | Effect of population breast screening on breast cancer mortality up to 2005 in England and Wales: an individual-level cohort study |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/bjc.2016.415 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27931047 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1859441771 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1847895836 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1868335950 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5243996 |
Volume | 116 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELdgkxAviG8CYzIS8ILMbMfxBy8Iqk0T0iaEmOhbZDupKBpJadN_gL-cu8RNNwZ7SJU2l6_e2Xf2nX8_Ql4qwWNVqJoV0SqmiuCZl84zW3tpYxQ-alyNfHKqj8_Up2kxTRNuq1RWuekT-466aiPOkR-AX3FIl2XE-8UvhqxRmF1NFBo3yS5Cl2FJl5maLegutwNmJk7HOclT4TvP7UH4gfiFQr9VSIh70SVdiTOvlkv-lTPtXdHRXXInxZD0w6D0e-RG3dwnt05SlvwB-T1AEtN2RhcjPxcNWH7eUegmYOgK16Xb3yKqfkl_9qE4hOV0vaBdS3EqiM4bmog-KG7fwKGs3sEunY9Ludg5Vh5R5Npdwg0QsPYhOTs6_Do5ZolrgUUYIXYsKGd4pfM4C0oG5U0tc19pCCZclLY2JopgcyG0A29WGe0qVRXCi8KraEKQ-SOy07RN_YRQoXkF57o8Bq1mIjoVJYdhizAQndZKZ-TN5u8uYwIiRz6M87JPiOe2BOWUqJwSlJORV6P0YgDg-I_c3kZzZWqGq3JrNBl5MR6GBoRZEd_U7RpllLFgO7m-Tkbj4jRX8Iw8HoxhfBgJPRziXWTEXDKTUQABvC8faebfeyDvQuJoEO77emNQFx79H-_49Pp3fEZuSww6uGDC7JGdbrmun0PI1IX9vl3Ap52IfbL78fD08xf4NtGTP5xrGQo |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Zb9QwELaqrQS8IG4CBYxEeUGmseP4QEKIo9WWdlcItaJvIXayYlFJlt2sEK_8IH4jM7m2pdC3PkSKksk54zk8428IeSJ56LNY5iz2RjIZu5SlwqbM5Kkw3vPUK1yNPBqr4aF8fxQfrZHf3VoYLKvsdGKtqLPS4xz5FtgVi-2yNH81-86waxRmV7sWGo1Y7OU_f0DItni5-w74uynEzvbB2yFruwowD7FQxZy0OsxU5CdOCidTnYsozRSYTeuFybX23JmIc2VBb2da2UxmMU95nEqvnUOgA1D56zKCUGZA1t9sjz98XMH8hqZB6cQJQCvCttQ-jMyW-4qIiVw9l9iC96QRPOPZni3Q_CtLWxu_nWvkauu10teNmF0na3lxg1watXn5m-RXA4JMywmd9R3BqMOC94qCYoJgGe5LV8c8CtucfqudfwgE6HJGq5Li5BOdFrRtLUJx-wQmbPECdum0XzzGjrHWiWJ33zk8ACFyb5HDC-HDbTIoyiK_SyhXYQbX2sg7JSfcW-lFCIES1-AP51IF5Fn3uxPfQp9jB47jpE7BRyYB5iTInASYE5DNnnrWQH78h26j41zSDvxFshLTgDzuT8OQxTxMWuTlEmmkNjY2kTqPRuFyOBuHAbnTCEP_MgJ0KiJsBESfEpOeACHDT58ppl9q6PBYYPwJz33aCdSJV__HN947_xsfkcvDg9F-sr873rtPrgh0eULOuN4gg2q-zB-Aw1a5h-0ooeTzRQ_MPyinUw0 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqIlVcEG9CCxiJckFmY8fxAwkhRFm1lFYcqNhbiB2vuqgk230IceVn8euYyWtbCr31sFK0md085u0Zf0PIM8ljX6QysNQbyWTqcpYLmzMTcmG857lXuBv54FDtHskPo3S0Rn53e2GwrbKzibWhLiqPa-QD8CsWx2VpPhi3bRGfdoZvpqcMJ0hhpbUbp9GIyH74-QPSt_nrvR3g9bYQw_ef3-2ydsIA85AXLZiTVseFSvzYSeFkroNI8kKBC7VemKC1584knCsLNrzQyhaySHnO01x67RyCHoD5v6aTlKOO6ZFeAf7GpsHrxKVAK-K26T5OzMB9Q-xErl5KHMZ71h1eiHEvtmr-Va-t3eDwJrnRxq_0bSNwt8haKG-TjYO2Qn-H_GrgkGk1ptN-Nhh12Pq-oGCiIG2G_6Wr7zyK3Yx-r9MASAnockoXFcVlKDopaTtkhOLnCziz-Ss4pJN-Gxk7wa4ninN-Z3ABBMu9S46uhAv3yHpZleEBoVzFBfzWJt4pOebeSi9iSJm4hsg4SBWRF93rznwLgo6zOE6yuhifmAyYkyFzMmBORLZ76mkD_vEfuq2Oc1lrAubZSmAj8rQ_DcqLFZm8DNUSaaQ2NjWJuoxG4cY4m8YRud8IQ38zAqwrYm1ERJ8Tk54AwcPPnyknxzWIeCowE4XrPu8E6syt_-MZH17-jE_IBqhj9nHvcH-TXBcY-8Sccb1F1hezZXgEkdvCPa5VhJKvV62TfwAwg1Xd |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+population+breast+screening+on+breast+cancer+mortality+up+to+2005+in+England+and+Wales%3A+an+individual-level+cohort+study&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+cancer&rft.au=Johns%2C+Louise+E&rft.au=Coleman%2C+Derek+A&rft.au=Swerdlow%2C+Anthony+J&rft.au=Moss%2C+Susan+M&rft.date=2017-01-17&rft.eissn=1532-1827&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038%2Fbjc.2016.415&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27931047&rft.externalDocID=27931047 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0007-0920&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0007-0920&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0007-0920&client=summon |