Effect of population breast screening on breast cancer mortality up to 2005 in England and Wales: an individual-level cohort study

Background: Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of cancer Vol. 116; no. 2; pp. 246 - 252
Main Authors Johns, Louise E, Coleman, Derek A, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Moss, Susan M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 17.01.2017
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background: Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality. Methods: We followed 988 090 women aged 49–64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated. Results: Invitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991–2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73–0.84, P <0·001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51–0·57, P <0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63–0·73, P <0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen. Conclusions: The results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms.
AbstractList Background: Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality. Methods: We followed 988 090 women aged 49-64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated. Results: Invitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991-2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84, P<0.001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51-0.57, P<0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.73, P<0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen. Conclusions: The results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms.
Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality.BACKGROUNDPopulation breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality.We followed 988 090 women aged 49-64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated.METHODSWe followed 988 090 women aged 49-64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated.Invitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991-2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84, P<0·001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51-0·57, P<0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0·73, P<0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen.RESULTSInvitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991-2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84, P<0·001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51-0·57, P<0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0·73, P<0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen.The results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms.CONCLUSIONSThe results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms.
Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality. We followed 988 090 women aged 49-64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated. Invitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991-2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84, P<0·001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51-0·57, P<0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0·73, P<0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen. The results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms.
Background:Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality.Methods:We followed 988 090 women aged 49-64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated.Results:Invitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991-2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84, P<0·001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51-0·57, P<0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0·73, P<0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen.Conclusions:The results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms.
Background: Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We have conducted the first individual-based cohort evaluation of population breast screening in the UK, to estimate the impact of the NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) on breast cancer mortality. Methods: We followed 988 090 women aged 49–64 years in 1991 resident in England and Wales, who because of the staggered implementation of the NHSBSP, included both invited subjects and an uninvited control group. Individual-level breast screening histories were linked to individual-level mortality and breast cancer incidence data from national registers. Risk of death from breast cancer was investigated by incidence-based mortality analyses in relation to intention to screen and first round attendance. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer following a single screening round was also investigated. Results: Invitation to NHSBSP screening was associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality in 1991–2005 of 21% (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73–0.84, P <0·001) after adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and lead-time. Breast cancer deaths among first invitation attenders were 46% lower than among non-attenders (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.51–0·57, P <0.001) and 32% lower following adjustment for age, socioeconomic status and self-selection bias (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.63–0·73, P <0.001). There was little evidence of overdiagnosis associated with invitation to first screen. Conclusions: The results indicate a substantial, statistically significant reduction in breast cancer mortality between 1991 and 2005 associated with NHSBSP activity. This is important in public health terms.
Author Coleman, Derek A
Johns, Louise E
Swerdlow, Anthony J
Moss, Susan M
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Louise E
  surname: Johns
  fullname: Johns, Louise E
  email: louise.johns@icr.ac.uk
  organization: Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Derek A
  surname: Coleman
  fullname: Coleman, Derek A
  organization: Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Anthony J
  surname: Swerdlow
  fullname: Swerdlow, Anthony J
  organization: Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Susan M
  surname: Moss
  fullname: Moss, Susan M
  organization: Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventative Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27931047$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNks9rFDEUx4NU7LZ68ywBLx6cNT8nEw-ClK0KBS-Kx5DJZLZZssmYZBb26l9utltrLQoeQn68z_vyXt73DJyEGCwAzzFaYkS7N_3GLAnC7ZJh_ggsMKekwR0RJ2CBEBINkgSdgrOcN_UqUSeegFMiJMWIiQX4sRpHawqMI5ziNHtdXAywT1bnArNJ1gYX1vD3m9HB2AS3MRXtXdnDeYIlQoIQhy7AVVh7HQZ4WN-0t_ltPdbA4HZumLVvvN1ZD028rgIwl3nYPwWPR-2zfXa7n4Ovl6svFx-bq88fPl28v2oMZ7I0PZMCDS01Y89Iz7SwhOqhlRhJQzorhMF9RzFuJRN4EK0c2MCxxlwzI_qe0HPw7qg7zf3WDsaGkrRXU3JbnfYqaqf-jAR3rdZxpzhhVMq2Cry6FUjx-2xzUVuXjfW1YRvnrHDXdpRyydF_oEx0knf0oPryAbqJcwr1JyrFJWNYCFypF_eLv6v61yQr8PoImBRzTna8QzBSB6OoahR1MIqqRqk4eYAbV26GX1t3_l9JzTEpV-2wtuleqX_jfwKCatAP
CODEN BJCAAI
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2017_11_002
crossref_primary_10_1093_jbi_wbz059
crossref_primary_10_1177_0300891618792439
crossref_primary_10_2147_CLEP_S267584
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_33204
crossref_primary_10_1111_ecc_12876
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers12040976
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_31904
crossref_primary_10_1177_0969141317713232
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_019_05330_9
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_33506
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_024_03258_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12282_021_01315_z
crossref_primary_10_4178_epih_e2017021
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_32859
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpobgyn_2021_11_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esmoop_2021_100111
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_maturitas_2020_02_007
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgh_2020_002466
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2023_076962
crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2017_101
crossref_primary_10_1093_ije_dyaa029
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_31832
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ro_2018_08_002
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41416_020_01163_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2022_01_053
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinepi_2024_111426
crossref_primary_10_1080_13697137_2017_1392503
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_5004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crad_2022_11_012
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0202385
crossref_primary_10_1136_bjophthalmol_2020_318407
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2021_106869
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2019_12_010
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_31195
crossref_primary_10_1158_1055_9965_EPI_21_0152
Cites_doi 10.1080/02841850701501725
10.1038/sj.bjc.6600301
10.1038/bjc.2014.642
10.1136/bmj.38313.639236.82
10.1136/jms.6.4.209
10.1136/jms.8.3.152
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0349
10.1016/j.crad.2005.01.008
10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.232
10.1002/cncr.21823
10.1038/bjc.1994.342
10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70380-7
10.1136/jms.8.3.125
10.1258/jms.2012.012079
10.1258/jms.2012.012080
10.1038/sj.bjc.6604123
10.1093/annonc/mdq447
10.1038/sj.bjc.6604532
10.1016/S1359-6349(06)80008-X
10.1258/jrsm.2009.090342
10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0320
10.1186/bcr3427
10.1136/bmj.314.7079.472
10.1002/ijc.29925
10.1177/0969141315623980
10.1002/cncr.10765
10.1136/bmj.308.6937.1125
10.1258/0969141042467304
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0803
10.1136/bmj.315.7118.1266
10.1136/bmj.321.7262.665
10.1056/NEJMsr1504363
10.1136/bmj.g3701
10.1056/NEJMoa1000727
10.1258/096914105775220732
10.1186/bcr3090
10.1258/jms.2009.009094
10.1258/jms.2012.012078
10.1093/jnci/dji057
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2017
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jan 17, 2017
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) 2017 The Author(s)
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2017
– notice: Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jan 17, 2017
– notice: Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) 2017 The Author(s)
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7RV
7TO
7U9
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8C1
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AN0
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
H94
HCIFZ
K9.
KB0
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7P
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1038/bjc.2016.415
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals (WRLC)
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Public Health Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
British Nursing Database
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Central Student
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Public Health
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
British Nursing Index with Full Text
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
ProQuest Central Student

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals (WRLC)
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
DocumentTitleAlternate Cohort evaluation of the NHSBSP
EISSN 1532-1827
EndPage 252
ExternalDocumentID PMC5243996
4303589701
27931047
10_1038_bjc_2016_415
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United Kingdom--UK
England
Wales
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Wales
– name: England
– name: United Kingdom--UK
GroupedDBID ---
-Q-
0R~
23N
36B
39C
3V.
4.4
406
53G
5GY
5RE
6J9
70F
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
AACDK
AANZL
AASML
AATNV
AAWTL
AAYZH
AAZLF
ABAKF
ABLJU
ABOCM
ABUWG
ABZZP
ACAOD
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACKTT
ACPRK
ACRQY
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADFRT
ADHDB
AEFQL
AEJRE
AEMSY
AENEX
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFKRA
AFRAH
AFSHS
AGAYW
AGHAI
AGQEE
AHMBA
AHSBF
AIGIU
AILAN
AJRNO
ALFFA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMYLF
AN0
AOIJS
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
BAWUL
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BKKNO
BNQBC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
E3Z
EAP
EBLON
EBS
EE.
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
ESX
EX3
F5P
FDQFY
FEDTE
FERAY
FIGPU
FIZPM
FRJ
FSGXE
FYUFA
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HVGLF
HYE
HZ~
IH2
IWAJR
JSO
JZLTJ
KQ8
M1P
M7P
NAO
NAPCQ
NQJWS
O9-
OK1
P2P
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
RNT
RNTTT
ROL
RPM
SNX
SNYQT
SOHCF
SOJ
SRMVM
SWTZT
TAOOD
TBHMF
TDRGL
TR2
UKHRP
W2D
WH7
WOW
~02
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACMFV
ACSTC
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TO
7U9
7XB
8FE
8FH
8FK
ABRTQ
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
H94
K9.
LK8
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-b4970d63cfb42b4a7e23ad69109c28e77c1b831169471d769d4d51a15a4c7bb23
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0007-0920
1532-1827
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 13:53:54 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 01:57:22 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 02:23:19 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 08:57:38 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:35:23 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:29:44 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:00:17 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:39:47 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords evaluation
mortality
individual-level
breast cancer
incidence-based mortality
population screening
Language English
License This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c549t-b4970d63cfb42b4a7e23ad69109c28e77c1b831169471d769d4d51a15a4c7bb23
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.nature.com/articles/bjc.2016.415
PMID 27931047
PQID 1859441771
PQPubID 41855
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5243996
proquest_miscellaneous_1868335950
proquest_miscellaneous_1847895836
proquest_journals_1859441771
pubmed_primary_27931047
crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2016_415
crossref_citationtrail_10_1038_bjc_2016_415
springer_journals_10_1038_bjc_2016_415
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-01-17
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-01-17
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-01-17
  day: 17
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle British journal of cancer
PublicationTitleAbbrev Br J Cancer
PublicationTitleAlternate Br J Cancer
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
Nature Publishing Group
Publisher_xml – name: Nature Publishing Group UK
– name: Nature Publishing Group
References Gabe, Tryggvadottir, Sigfusson, Olafsdottir, Sigurdsson, Duffy (CR14) 2007; 48
Paci, Broeders, Hofvind, Puliti, Duffy (CR30) 2014; 23
Weedon-Fekjaer, Romundstad, Vatten (CR41) 2014; 348
Duffy, Tabar, Chen, Holmqvist, Yen, Abdsalah, Epstein, Frodis, Ljungberg, Hedborg-Melander, Sundbom, Tholin, Wiege, Akerlund, Wu, Tung, Chiu, Chiu, Huang, Smith, Rosen, Stenbeck, Holmberg (CR11) 2002; 95
Jorgensen, Gotzsche (CR20) 2016; 13
Njor, Nystrom, Moss, Paci, Broeders, Segnan, Lynge (CR27) 2012; 19
Olsen, Njor, Vejborg, Schwartz, Dalgaard, Jensen, Tange, Blichert-Toft, Rank, Mouridsen, Lynge (CR28) 2005; 330
CR16
Jonsson, Nystrom, Tornberg, Lenner (CR18) 2001; 8
Lauby-Secretan, Scoccianti, Loomis, Benbrahim-Tallaa, Bouvard, Bianchini, Straif (CR22) 2015; 372
(CR39) 2006; 15
Michalopoulos, Duffy (CR24) 2016; 23
Fielder, Warwick, Brook, Gower-Thomas, Cuzick, Monypenny, Duffy (CR13) 2004; 11
Paap, Verbeek, Puliti, Paci, Broeders (CR29) 2011; 22
Phillimore, Beattie, Townsend (CR33) 1994; 308
Stockton, Davies, Day, McCann (CR37) 1997; 314
Moss, Nystrom, Jonsson, Paci, Lynge, Njor, Broeders (CR26) 2012; 19
Parvinen, Heinavaara, Anttila, Helenius, Klemi, Pylkkanen (CR32) 2015; 112
Puliti, Miccinesi, Zappa, Manneschi, Crocetti, Paci (CR35) 2012; 14
Blanks, Moss, McGahan, Quinn, Babb (CR5) 2000; 321
Wilson, Evans (CR43) 2006; 4
Allgood, Warwick, Warren, Day, Duffy (CR2) 2008; 98
Hakama, Pukkala, Soderman, Day (CR15) 1999; 6
Alexander, Anderson, Brown, Forrest, Hepburn, Kirkpatrick, McDonald, Muir, Prescott, Shepherd (CR1) 1994; 70
Broeders, Moss, Nystrom, Njor, Jonsson, Paap, Massat, Duffy, Lynge, Paci (CR7) 2012; 19
Duffy, Tabar, Olsen, Vitak, Allgood, Chen, Yen, Smith (CR12) 2010; 17
Kalager, Zelen, Langmark, Adami (CR21) 2010; 363
Massat, Dibden, Parmar, Cuzick, Sasieni, Duffy (CR23) 2016; 25
Swerdlow, Jones (CR40) 2005; 97
CR8
(CR17) 2012; 380
Duffy, Parmar (CR10) 2013; 15
Paci, Duffy, Giorgi, Zappa, Crocetti, Vezzosi, Bianchi, del Turco (CR31) 2002; 87
Puliti, Miccinesi, Collina, De Lisi, Federico, Ferretti, Finarelli, Foca, Mangone, Naldoni, Petrella, Ponti, Segnan, Sigona, Zarcone, Zorzi, Zappa, Paci (CR34) 2008; 99
Biesheuvel, Barratt, Howard, Houssami, Irwig (CR3) 2007; 8
Richardson (CR36) 2001; 8
Duffy, Cuzick (CR9) 2002; 51
Blanks, Bennett, Patnick, Cush, Davison, Moss (CR4) 2005; 60
Bleyer, Baines, Miller (CR6) 2016; 138
Weedon-Fekjaer, Vatten, Aalen, Lindqvist, Tretli (CR42) 2005; 12
Jorgensen, Gotzsche (CR19) 2010; 103
Moritz, Bates, Henderson, Humphreys, Michell (CR25) 1997; 315
Svendsen, Olsen, von Euler-Chelpin, Lynge (CR38) 2006; 106
A Bleyer (BFbjc2016415_CR6) 2016; 138
RM Wilson (BFbjc2016415_CR43) 2006; 4
M Broeders (BFbjc2016415_CR7) 2012; 19
B Lauby-Secretan (BFbjc2016415_CR22) 2015; 372
HM Fielder (BFbjc2016415_CR13) 2004; 11
AL Svendsen (BFbjc2016415_CR38) 2006; 106
Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening (BFbjc2016415_CR17) 2012; 380
BFbjc2016415_CR16
RG Blanks (BFbjc2016415_CR4) 2005; 60
M Hakama (BFbjc2016415_CR15) 1999; 6
AJ Swerdlow (BFbjc2016415_CR40) 2005; 97
KJ Jorgensen (BFbjc2016415_CR19) 2010; 103
PC Allgood (BFbjc2016415_CR2) 2008; 98
H Weedon-Fekjaer (BFbjc2016415_CR41) 2014; 348
H Jonsson (BFbjc2016415_CR18) 2001; 8
E Paap (BFbjc2016415_CR29) 2011; 22
P Phillimore (BFbjc2016415_CR33) 1994; 308
AH Olsen (BFbjc2016415_CR28) 2005; 330
I Parvinen (BFbjc2016415_CR32) 2015; 112
D Puliti (BFbjc2016415_CR35) 2012; 14
SW Duffy (BFbjc2016415_CR12) 2010; 17
E Paci (BFbjc2016415_CR30) 2014; 23
D Stockton (BFbjc2016415_CR37) 1997; 314
SM Moss (BFbjc2016415_CR26) 2012; 19
KJ Jorgensen (BFbjc2016415_CR20) 2016; 13
M Kalager (BFbjc2016415_CR21) 2010; 363
H Weedon-Fekjaer (BFbjc2016415_CR42) 2005; 12
NJ Massat (BFbjc2016415_CR23) 2016; 25
C Biesheuvel (BFbjc2016415_CR3) 2007; 8
FE Alexander (BFbjc2016415_CR1) 1994; 70
D Puliti (BFbjc2016415_CR34) 2008; 99
SW Duffy (BFbjc2016415_CR9) 2002; 51
S Njor (BFbjc2016415_CR27) 2012; 19
E Paci (BFbjc2016415_CR31) 2002; 87
D Michalopoulos (BFbjc2016415_CR24) 2016; 23
R Gabe (BFbjc2016415_CR14) 2007; 48
Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group (BFbjc2016415_CR39) 2006; 15
A Richardson (BFbjc2016415_CR36) 2001; 8
SW Duffy (BFbjc2016415_CR10) 2013; 15
SW Duffy (BFbjc2016415_CR11) 2002; 95
S Moritz (BFbjc2016415_CR25) 1997; 315
RG Blanks (BFbjc2016415_CR5) 2000; 321
BFbjc2016415_CR8
28399111 - Br J Cancer. 2017 Jul 11;117(2):e2
References_xml – volume: 48
  start-page: 948
  issue: 9
  year: 2007
  end-page: 955
  ident: CR14
  article-title: A case-control study to estimate the impact of the Icelandic population-based mammography screening program on breast cancer death
  publication-title: Acta Radiol
  doi: 10.1080/02841850701501725
– volume: 87
  start-page: 65
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  end-page: 69
  ident: CR31
  article-title: Quantification of the effect of mammographic screening on fatal breast cancers: The Florence Programme 1990-96
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600301
– volume: 112
  start-page: 918
  issue: 5
  year: 2015
  end-page: 924
  ident: CR32
  article-title: Mammography screening in three Finnish residential areas: comprehensive population-based study of breast cancer incidence and incidence-based mortality 1976-2009
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.642
– volume: 330
  start-page: 220
  issue: 7485
  year: 2005
  ident: CR28
  article-title: Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: cohort study
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.38313.639236.82
– volume: 6
  start-page: 209
  issue: 4
  year: 1999
  end-page: 216
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Implementation of screening as a public health policy: issues in design and evaluation
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1136/jms.6.4.209
– volume: 8
  start-page: 152
  issue: 3
  year: 2001
  end-page: 160
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Service screening with mammography of women aged 50-69 years in Sweden: effects on mortality from breast cancer
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1136/jms.8.3.152
– volume: 15
  start-page: 45
  issue: 1
  year: 2006
  end-page: 51
  ident: CR39
  article-title: Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0349
– ident: CR16
– volume: 60
  start-page: 674
  issue: 6
  year: 2005
  end-page: 680
  ident: CR4
  article-title: The effect of changing from one to two views at incident (subsequent) screens in the NHS breast screening programme in England: impact on cancer detection and recall rates
  publication-title: Clin Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.01.008
– volume: 13
  start-page: 139
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  end-page: 140
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Breast cancer: Updated screening guidelines—much ado about small improvements
  publication-title: Nat Rev Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.232
– volume: 106
  start-page: 1883
  issue: 9
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1890
  ident: CR38
  article-title: Breast cancer incidence after the introduction of mammography screening: what should be expected?
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.21823
– volume: 70
  start-page: 542
  issue: 3
  year: 1994
  end-page: 548
  ident: CR1
  article-title: The Edinburgh randomised trial of breast cancer screening: results after 10 years of follow-up
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.342
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1129
  issue: 12
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1138
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70380-7
– volume: 8
  start-page: 125
  issue: 3
  year: 2001
  end-page: 127
  ident: CR36
  article-title: Screening and the number needed to treat
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1136/jms.8.3.125
– volume: 19
  start-page: 26
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 32
  ident: CR26
  article-title: The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of trend studies
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012079
– volume: 19
  start-page: 33
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 41
  ident: CR27
  article-title: Breast cancer mortality in mammographic screening in Europe: a review of incidence-based mortality studies
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012080
– volume: 98
  start-page: 206
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  end-page: 209
  ident: CR2
  article-title: A case-control study of the impact of the East Anglian breast screening programme on breast cancer mortality
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604123
– volume: 22
  start-page: 863
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  end-page: 869
  ident: CR29
  article-title: Breast cancer screening case-control study design: impact on breast cancer mortality
  publication-title: Ann Oncol
  doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq447
– volume: 99
  start-page: 423
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  end-page: 427
  ident: CR34
  article-title: Effectiveness of service screening: a case-control study to assess breast cancer mortality reduction
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604532
– volume: 4
  start-page: 6
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  end-page: 9
  ident: CR43
  article-title: Over-diagnosis and breast cancer screening
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/S1359-6349(06)80008-X
– ident: CR8
– volume: 51
  start-page: 235
  issue: 2
  year: 2002
  end-page: 243
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Correcting for non-compliance bias in case-control studies to evaluate cancer screening programmes
  publication-title: Appl Stat
– volume: 103
  start-page: 14
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 20
  ident: CR19
  article-title: Who evaluates public health programmes? A review of the NHS Breast Screening Programme
  publication-title: J R Soc Med
  doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090342
– volume: 380
  start-page: 1778
  issue: 9855
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1786
  ident: CR17
  article-title: The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1159
  issue: 7
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1163
  ident: CR30
  article-title: European breast cancer service screening outcomes: a first balance sheet of the benefits and harms
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0320
– volume: 15
  start-page: R41
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: the importance of length of observation period and lead time
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1186/bcr3427
– volume: 314
  start-page: 472
  issue: 7079
  year: 1997
  end-page: 475
  ident: CR37
  article-title: Retrospective study of reasons for improved survival in patients with breast cancer in east Anglia: earlier diagnosis or better treatment
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.472
– volume: 138
  start-page: 2003
  issue: 8
  year: 2016
  end-page: 2012
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Impact of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality
  publication-title: Int J Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.29925
– volume: 23
  start-page: 192
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  end-page: 202
  ident: CR24
  article-title: Estimation of overdiagnosis using short-term trends and lead time estimates uncontaminated by overdiagnosed cases: Results from the Norwegian Breast Screening Programme
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1177/0969141315623980
– volume: 95
  start-page: 458
  issue: 3
  year: 2002
  end-page: 469
  ident: CR11
  article-title: The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.10765
– volume: 308
  start-page: 1125
  issue: 6937
  year: 1994
  end-page: 1128
  ident: CR33
  article-title: Widening inequality of health in northern England, 1981-91
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6937.1125
– volume: 11
  start-page: 194
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  end-page: 198
  ident: CR13
  article-title: A case-control study to estimate the impact on breast cancer death of the breast screening programme in Wales
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1258/0969141042467304
– volume: 25
  start-page: 455
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  end-page: 462
  ident: CR23
  article-title: Impact of Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality: The UK Program 20 Years On
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0803
– volume: 315
  start-page: 1266
  issue: 7118
  year: 1997
  end-page: 1272
  ident: CR25
  article-title: Variation in management of small invasive breast cancers detected on screening in the former south east Thames region: observational study
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7118.1266
– volume: 321
  start-page: 665
  issue: 7262
  year: 2000
  end-page: 669
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.665
– volume: 372
  start-page: 2353
  issue: 24
  year: 2015
  end-page: 2358
  ident: CR22
  article-title: Breast-cancer screening–-viewpoint of the IARC Working Group
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1504363
– volume: 348
  start-page: g3701
  year: 2014
  ident: CR41
  article-title: Modern mammography screening and breast cancer mortality: population study
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3701
– volume: 363
  start-page: 1203
  issue: 13
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1210
  ident: CR21
  article-title: Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000727
– volume: 12
  start-page: 172
  issue: 4
  year: 2005
  end-page: 178
  ident: CR42
  article-title: Estimating mean sojourn time and screening test sensitivity in breast cancer mammography screening: new results
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1258/096914105775220732
– volume: 14
  start-page: R9
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: CR35
  article-title: Balancing harms and benefits of service mammography screening programs: a cohort study
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1186/bcr3090
– volume: 17
  start-page: 25
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 30
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Absolute numbers of lives saved and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening, from a randomized trial and from the Breast Screening Programme in England
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1258/jms.2009.009094
– volume: 19
  start-page: 14
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 25
  ident: CR7
  article-title: The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012078
– volume: 97
  start-page: 375
  issue: 5
  year: 2005
  end-page: 384
  ident: CR40
  article-title: Tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer and risk of endometrial cancer: a case-control study
  publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji057
– volume: 363
  start-page: 1203
  issue: 13
  year: 2010
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR21
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000727
– volume: 11
  start-page: 194
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR13
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1258/0969141042467304
– volume: 15
  start-page: R41
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR10
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1186/bcr3427
– volume: 14
  start-page: R9
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR35
  publication-title: Breast Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1186/bcr3090
– volume: 308
  start-page: 1125
  issue: 6937
  year: 1994
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR33
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6937.1125
– volume: 23
  start-page: 192
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR24
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1177/0969141315623980
– volume: 8
  start-page: 125
  issue: 3
  year: 2001
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR36
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1136/jms.8.3.125
– volume: 15
  start-page: 45
  issue: 1
  year: 2006
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR39
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0349
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1129
  issue: 12
  year: 2007
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR3
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70380-7
– volume: 321
  start-page: 665
  issue: 7262
  year: 2000
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR5
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.665
– volume: 19
  start-page: 33
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2012
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR27
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012080
– volume: 98
  start-page: 206
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR2
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604123
– volume: 138
  start-page: 2003
  issue: 8
  year: 2016
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR6
  publication-title: Int J Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.29925
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1159
  issue: 7
  year: 2014
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR30
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0320
– volume: 380
  start-page: 1778
  issue: 9855
  year: 2012
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR17
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0
– volume: 97
  start-page: 375
  issue: 5
  year: 2005
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR40
  publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji057
– volume: 25
  start-page: 455
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR23
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0803
– ident: BFbjc2016415_CR8
– volume: 8
  start-page: 152
  issue: 3
  year: 2001
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR18
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1136/jms.8.3.152
– volume: 48
  start-page: 948
  issue: 9
  year: 2007
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR14
  publication-title: Acta Radiol
  doi: 10.1080/02841850701501725
– volume: 314
  start-page: 472
  issue: 7079
  year: 1997
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR37
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.472
– volume: 60
  start-page: 674
  issue: 6
  year: 2005
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR4
  publication-title: Clin Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.01.008
– ident: BFbjc2016415_CR16
– volume: 6
  start-page: 209
  issue: 4
  year: 1999
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR15
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1136/jms.6.4.209
– volume: 112
  start-page: 918
  issue: 5
  year: 2015
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR32
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.642
– volume: 70
  start-page: 542
  issue: 3
  year: 1994
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR1
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.342
– volume: 51
  start-page: 235
  issue: 2
  year: 2002
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR9
  publication-title: Appl Stat
– volume: 372
  start-page: 2353
  issue: 24
  year: 2015
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR22
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1504363
– volume: 13
  start-page: 139
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR20
  publication-title: Nat Rev Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.232
– volume: 330
  start-page: 220
  issue: 7485
  year: 2005
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR28
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.38313.639236.82
– volume: 106
  start-page: 1883
  issue: 9
  year: 2006
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR38
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.21823
– volume: 95
  start-page: 458
  issue: 3
  year: 2002
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR11
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.10765
– volume: 4
  start-page: 6
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR43
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/S1359-6349(06)80008-X
– volume: 12
  start-page: 172
  issue: 4
  year: 2005
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR42
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1258/096914105775220732
– volume: 87
  start-page: 65
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR31
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600301
– volume: 19
  start-page: 14
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2012
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR7
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012078
– volume: 315
  start-page: 1266
  issue: 7118
  year: 1997
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR25
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7118.1266
– volume: 22
  start-page: 863
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR29
  publication-title: Ann Oncol
  doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq447
– volume: 99
  start-page: 423
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR34
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604532
– volume: 19
  start-page: 26
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2012
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR26
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012079
– volume: 103
  start-page: 14
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR19
  publication-title: J R Soc Med
  doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090342
– volume: 348
  start-page: g3701
  year: 2014
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR41
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3701
– volume: 17
  start-page: 25
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: BFbjc2016415_CR12
  publication-title: J Med Screen
  doi: 10.1258/jms.2009.009094
– reference: 28399111 - Br J Cancer. 2017 Jul 11;117(2):e2
SSID ssj0009087
Score 2.3957827
Snippet Background: Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains...
Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains controversial. We...
Background:Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains...
Background: Population breast screening has been implemented in the UK for over 25 years, but the size of benefit attributable to such programmes remains...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 246
SubjectTerms 692/699/67/1347
692/699/67/2322
692/699/67/2324
692/700/478/2772
Adult
Aged
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - mortality
Cancer Research
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Drug Resistance
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
England - epidemiology
Epidemiology
Female
Humans
Mammography
Mass Screening - methods
Medical research
Middle Aged
Molecular Medicine
Mortality
Oncology
Population
Socioeconomic factors
Wales - epidemiology
Womens health
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals (WRLC)
  dbid: C6C
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwELaqVkJcUHmntMhIwAUMseMnN7SiqpDKiYreItvxikUlu9pm_0B_eWecR1kKiEOkKB7HTsaPz_bMN4S8lLyMjZKJqWglkyp45oXzzCYvbIzcR43eyKdf9MmZ_HyuznfI29EXJhvtZ0rLPEyP1mHvww_kG-T6XfYo30PSdmzPMz27odgtbc-QiZtvTpSDmXtZ2a3c2xPQLVR52zjytxPSPPEc75N7A2KkH_s63ic7qX1A7pwOZ-IPyVVPQEyXc7qaonHRgMbmHYVBARaq8F568yyiotf0ZwbeAMLpZkW7JcWNH7po6RDWg-L1DaaPyw9wSxeT4xa7QDsjipF111AA0tM-ImfHn77OTtgQWYFFWA92LEhnykZXcR6kCNKbJCrfaIAOLgqbjIk82Ipz7WDuaox2jWwU91x5GU0IonpMdttlm54SynXZQF5XxaDlnEcnoyhhkcINYNEkdUHejL-7jgPtOEa_uKjz8Xdla1BOjcqpQTkFeTVJr3q6jb_IHY6aq4dOd1kD9HAYUc3wgryYkqG74BmIb9NygzLSWKdspf8lo9EVzamyIE_6xjBVRsB4huwWBTFbzWQSQLru7ZR28T3TdiuBaz8o9_XYoH6p-h--8eB_BZ-RuwLBRskZN4dkt1tv0hFApS48zz3kGjtBEYQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Effect of population breast screening on breast cancer mortality up to 2005 in England and Wales: an individual-level cohort study
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/bjc.2016.415
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27931047
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1859441771
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1847895836
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1868335950
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5243996
Volume 116
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELdgkxAviG8CYzIS8ILMbMfxBy8Iqk0T0iaEmOhbZDupKBpJadN_gL-cu8RNNwZ7SJU2l6_e2Xf2nX8_Ql4qwWNVqJoV0SqmiuCZl84zW3tpYxQ-alyNfHKqj8_Up2kxTRNuq1RWuekT-466aiPOkR-AX3FIl2XE-8UvhqxRmF1NFBo3yS5Cl2FJl5maLegutwNmJk7HOclT4TvP7UH4gfiFQr9VSIh70SVdiTOvlkv-lTPtXdHRXXInxZD0w6D0e-RG3dwnt05SlvwB-T1AEtN2RhcjPxcNWH7eUegmYOgK16Xb3yKqfkl_9qE4hOV0vaBdS3EqiM4bmog-KG7fwKGs3sEunY9Ludg5Vh5R5Npdwg0QsPYhOTs6_Do5ZolrgUUYIXYsKGd4pfM4C0oG5U0tc19pCCZclLY2JopgcyG0A29WGe0qVRXCi8KraEKQ-SOy07RN_YRQoXkF57o8Bq1mIjoVJYdhizAQndZKZ-TN5u8uYwIiRz6M87JPiOe2BOWUqJwSlJORV6P0YgDg-I_c3kZzZWqGq3JrNBl5MR6GBoRZEd_U7RpllLFgO7m-Tkbj4jRX8Iw8HoxhfBgJPRziXWTEXDKTUQABvC8faebfeyDvQuJoEO77emNQFx79H-_49Pp3fEZuSww6uGDC7JGdbrmun0PI1IX9vl3Ap52IfbL78fD08xf4NtGTP5xrGQo
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Zb9QwELaqrQS8IG4CBYxEeUGmseP4QEKIo9WWdlcItaJvIXayYlFJlt2sEK_8IH4jM7m2pdC3PkSKksk54zk8428IeSJ56LNY5iz2RjIZu5SlwqbM5Kkw3vPUK1yNPBqr4aF8fxQfrZHf3VoYLKvsdGKtqLPS4xz5FtgVi-2yNH81-86waxRmV7sWGo1Y7OU_f0DItni5-w74uynEzvbB2yFruwowD7FQxZy0OsxU5CdOCidTnYsozRSYTeuFybX23JmIc2VBb2da2UxmMU95nEqvnUOgA1D56zKCUGZA1t9sjz98XMH8hqZB6cQJQCvCttQ-jMyW-4qIiVw9l9iC96QRPOPZni3Q_CtLWxu_nWvkauu10teNmF0na3lxg1watXn5m-RXA4JMywmd9R3BqMOC94qCYoJgGe5LV8c8CtucfqudfwgE6HJGq5Li5BOdFrRtLUJx-wQmbPECdum0XzzGjrHWiWJ33zk8ACFyb5HDC-HDbTIoyiK_SyhXYQbX2sg7JSfcW-lFCIES1-AP51IF5Fn3uxPfQp9jB47jpE7BRyYB5iTInASYE5DNnnrWQH78h26j41zSDvxFshLTgDzuT8OQxTxMWuTlEmmkNjY2kTqPRuFyOBuHAbnTCEP_MgJ0KiJsBESfEpOeACHDT58ppl9q6PBYYPwJz33aCdSJV__HN947_xsfkcvDg9F-sr873rtPrgh0eULOuN4gg2q-zB-Aw1a5h-0ooeTzRQ_MPyinUw0
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqIlVcEG9CCxiJckFmY8fxAwkhRFm1lFYcqNhbiB2vuqgk230IceVn8euYyWtbCr31sFK0md085u0Zf0PIM8ljX6QysNQbyWTqcpYLmzMTcmG857lXuBv54FDtHskPo3S0Rn53e2GwrbKzibWhLiqPa-QD8CsWx2VpPhi3bRGfdoZvpqcMJ0hhpbUbp9GIyH74-QPSt_nrvR3g9bYQw_ef3-2ydsIA85AXLZiTVseFSvzYSeFkroNI8kKBC7VemKC1584knCsLNrzQyhaySHnO01x67RyCHoD5v6aTlKOO6ZFeAf7GpsHrxKVAK-K26T5OzMB9Q-xErl5KHMZ71h1eiHEvtmr-Va-t3eDwJrnRxq_0bSNwt8haKG-TjYO2Qn-H_GrgkGk1ptN-Nhh12Pq-oGCiIG2G_6Wr7zyK3Yx-r9MASAnockoXFcVlKDopaTtkhOLnCziz-Ss4pJN-Gxk7wa4ninN-Z3ABBMu9S46uhAv3yHpZleEBoVzFBfzWJt4pOebeSi9iSJm4hsg4SBWRF93rznwLgo6zOE6yuhifmAyYkyFzMmBORLZ76mkD_vEfuq2Oc1lrAubZSmAj8rQ_DcqLFZm8DNUSaaQ2NjWJuoxG4cY4m8YRud8IQ38zAqwrYm1ERJ8Tk54AwcPPnyknxzWIeCowE4XrPu8E6syt_-MZH17-jE_IBqhj9nHvcH-TXBcY-8Sccb1F1hezZXgEkdvCPa5VhJKvV62TfwAwg1Xd
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+population+breast+screening+on+breast+cancer+mortality+up+to+2005+in+England+and+Wales%3A+an+individual-level+cohort+study&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+cancer&rft.au=Johns%2C+Louise+E&rft.au=Coleman%2C+Derek+A&rft.au=Swerdlow%2C+Anthony+J&rft.au=Moss%2C+Susan+M&rft.date=2017-01-17&rft.eissn=1532-1827&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038%2Fbjc.2016.415&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27931047&rft.externalDocID=27931047
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0007-0920&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0007-0920&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0007-0920&client=summon