A comparison of male and female renal pelvis urobiome of unilateral stone formers using 2bRAD-M
Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanism...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC microbiology Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 456 - 12 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
06.11.2024
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females.
Renal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF).
Through the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups.
Variations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract Background Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females. Methods Renal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF). Results Through the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups. Conclusion Variations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences. BackgroundUrolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females.MethodsRenal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF).ResultsThrough the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups.ConclusionVariations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences. Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females.BACKGROUNDUrolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females.Renal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF).METHODSRenal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF).Through the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups.RESULTSThrough the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups.Variations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences.CONCLUSIONVariations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences. Background Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females. Methods Renal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF). Results Through the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups. Conclusion Variations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences. Keywords: Urolithiasis, Renal pelvis urine, Urobiome, Gender, 2bRAD-M Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females. Renal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF). Through the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups. Variations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences. Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females. Renal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF). Through the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups. Variations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences. |
ArticleNumber | 456 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Miao, Lin-Tao Hong, Sen-Yuan Wang, Shao-Gang Yang, Yuan-Yuan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sen-Yuan surname: Hong fullname: Hong, Sen-Yuan – sequence: 2 givenname: Lin-Tao surname: Miao fullname: Miao, Lin-Tao – sequence: 3 givenname: Yuan-Yuan surname: Yang fullname: Yang, Yuan-Yuan – sequence: 4 givenname: Shao-Gang surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Shao-Gang |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39506630$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkk1v1DAQhiNURD_gD3BAkbiUQ4q_Y5_Qqnx0pSKkAmfLccaLV4m92EkF_x7vblu6CPlga-bxa8_Me1odhRigql5idIGxFG8zJlKIBhHWICqwbPiT6gSzFjcES3T06Hxcnea8Rgi3krbPqmOqOBKCopNKL2obx41JPsdQR1ePZoDahL52sDsmCGaoNzDc-lzPKXY-jrAF5-AHM0Eq2TyVj9UuphFSgbIPq5p0N4v3zefn1VNnhgwv7vaz6vvHD98ur5rrL5-Wl4vrxnKmpqajQLseWiKUUS0Wou-RYByAg6OIOMEU7VSrek6w48wQKwWjljFGkOkdp2fVcq_bR7PWm-RHk37raLzeBWJaaZMmbwfQvaNUdbJDUnBGuOsstAaUc1gQyTpZtN7ttTZzN0JvIUylygPRw0zwP_Qq3mqMOVWUbBXO7xRS_DlDnvTos4VhMAHinDXFpJTNMGYFff0Puo5zKj3fUYJh0Yr2L7UqM9E-uFgetltRvZCYY6xkqwp18R-qrB5Gb8uMnC_xgwtvDi4UZoJf08rMOevl15tD9tXjrjy0495LBSB7wKaYcwL3gGCkt4bVe8PqYli9M6zm9A_yltn4 |
Cites_doi | 10.1681/ASN.2018121241 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.080 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.048 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.010 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100753 10.1093/nar/28.1.33 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 10.1186/s12866-020-01992-4 10.1111/1471-0528.15920 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6 10.1186/s13059-021-02576-9 10.1007/s40620-014-0064-1 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.04.012 10.1186/s40168-017-0305-3 10.1038/s41598-017-02995-4 10.1007/s00192-021-04832-9 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.009 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00041 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.006 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.069 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.117 10.1186/s12866-020-01734-6 10.1038/s41467-018-03968-5 10.1186/s12967-022-03639-6 10.1038/s41598-019-41977-6 10.1128/JCM.02876-13 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01048 10.5114/aoms.2015.50970 10.1128/JCM.05852-11 10.1007/s00345-020-03286-w 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00167 10.1038/nrdp.2016.8 10.1186/1479-5876-10-174 10.1080/07853890.2022.2085882 10.1186/s12967-020-02282-3 10.1007/s00240-019-01146-w |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 3V. 7QL 7T7 7U9 7X7 7XB 88E 8FD 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI C1K CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. LK8 M0S M1P M7N M7P P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12866-024-03618-5 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Biological Science Collection Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Medical Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology |
EISSN | 1471-2180 |
EndPage | 12 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_df339b8b0865425fbce7ae9ff16284b8 PMC11539328 A815119879 39506630 10_1186_s12866_024_03618_5 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GeographicLocations | China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China grantid: 82170778 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IGS IHR INH INR ISR ITC KQ8 LK5 LK8 M1P M48 M7P M7R MM. M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB ~02 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PMFND 3V. 7QL 7T7 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ H94 K9. M7N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-b3e3bde7269a97166dd0645ee5ef302f6493b979d521f54a2c8643c44420adf53 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1471-2180 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:27:58 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:43:44 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 05:29:40 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:16:37 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:03:38 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:00:19 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 05:29:12 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:54:49 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:31:48 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | 2bRAD-M Renal pelvis urine Gender Urobiome Urolithiasis |
Language | English |
License | 2024. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c549t-b3e3bde7269a97166dd0645ee5ef302f6493b979d521f54a2c8643c44420adf53 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3126416767?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 39506630 |
PQID | 3126416767 |
PQPubID | 42585 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_df339b8b0865425fbce7ae9ff16284b8 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11539328 proquest_miscellaneous_3125494114 proquest_journals_3126416767 gale_infotracmisc_A815119879 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A815119879 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A815119879 pubmed_primary_39506630 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_024_03618_5 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-11-06 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-11-06 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2024 text: 2024-11-06 day: 06 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC microbiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Microbiol |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | AJ Wolfe (3618_CR7) 2012; 50 C Gottschick (3618_CR29) 2017; 5 EE Hilt (3618_CR8) 2014; 52 RA Dornbier (3618_CR24) 2020; 48 Z Sun (3618_CR12) 2022; 23 H Yu (3618_CR38) 2015; 11 JZ Xu (3618_CR30) 2022; 54 M Prochaska (3618_CR20) 2018; 200 P Wu (3618_CR37) 2018; 8 3618_CR22 F Liu (3618_CR9) 2020; 18 3618_CR25 SY Hong (3618_CR17) 2022; 20 S Nackeeran (3618_CR21) 2021; 39 MR D’Costa (3618_CR2) 2019; 30 JY Li (3618_CR19) 2010; 184 K Thomas-White (3618_CR35) 2018; 9 J Shoag (3618_CR3) 2014; 192 M Kanehisa (3618_CR16) 2000; 28 B Anglim (3618_CR34) 2022; 33 RL Tatusov (3618_CR15) 2000; 28 DE Fouts (3618_CR11) 2012; 10 F Liu (3618_CR26) 2020; 20 ML Neugent (3618_CR33) 2022; 3 T Chen (3618_CR39) 2017; 7 SR Khan (3618_CR4) 2016; 2 N Segata (3618_CR14) 2011; 12 TK Price (3618_CR31) 2020; 127 W Kwak (3618_CR36) 2020; 11 J Xie (3618_CR10) 2020; 20 I Sorokin (3618_CR1) 2017; 35 DA Lewis (3618_CR28) 2013; 3 3618_CR13 L Cappuccino (3618_CR27) 2014; 27 CD Scales Jr (3618_CR5) 2007; 177 PM Ferraro (3618_CR6) 2022; 42 G Tundo (3618_CR18) 2018; 200 A Zampini (3618_CR23) 2019; 9 3618_CR32 |
References_xml | – volume: 30 start-page: 1251 issue: 7 year: 2019 ident: 3618_CR2 publication-title: J Am Soc Nephrol doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018121241 – volume: 200 start-page: 823 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 3618_CR20 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.080 – volume: 200 start-page: 1273 issue: 6 year: 2018 ident: 3618_CR18 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.048 – ident: 3618_CR25 doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.010 – volume: 3 start-page: 100753 issue: 10 year: 2022 ident: 3618_CR33 publication-title: Cell Rep Med doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100753 – volume: 28 start-page: 33 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 3618_CR15 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.33 – volume: 12 start-page: R60 issue: 6 year: 2011 ident: 3618_CR14 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 – volume: 28 start-page: 27 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 3618_CR16 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 – volume: 20 start-page: 336 year: 2020 ident: 3618_CR26 publication-title: BMC Microbiol doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01992-4 – volume: 127 start-page: 193 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 3618_CR31 publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15920 – volume: 35 start-page: 1301 issue: 9 year: 2017 ident: 3618_CR1 publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6 – volume: 23 start-page: 36 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 3618_CR12 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02576-9 – volume: 27 start-page: 117 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 3618_CR27 publication-title: J Nephrol doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0064-1 – volume: 42 start-page: 230 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 3618_CR6 publication-title: Semin Nephrol doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.04.012 – volume: 5 start-page: 99 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 3618_CR29 publication-title: Microbiome doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0305-3 – volume: 7 start-page: 2594 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 3618_CR39 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02995-4 – volume: 33 start-page: 2107 issue: 8 year: 2022 ident: 3618_CR34 publication-title: Int Urogynecol J doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04832-9 – volume: 184 start-page: 2360 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 3618_CR19 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.009 – volume: 3 start-page: 41 year: 2013 ident: 3618_CR28 publication-title: Front Cell Infect Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00041 – ident: 3618_CR32 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.006 – volume: 177 start-page: 979 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 3618_CR5 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.069 – volume: 192 start-page: 1440 issue: 5 year: 2014 ident: 3618_CR3 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.117 – volume: 20 start-page: 41 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 3618_CR10 publication-title: BMC Microbiol doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01734-6 – volume: 9 start-page: 1557 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 3618_CR35 publication-title: Nat Commun doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03968-5 – volume: 20 start-page: 431 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 3618_CR17 publication-title: J Transl Med doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03639-6 – volume: 9 start-page: 5425 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 3618_CR23 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41977-6 – volume: 52 start-page: 871 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 3618_CR8 publication-title: J Clin Microbiol doi: 10.1128/JCM.02876-13 – volume: 11 start-page: 1048 year: 2020 ident: 3618_CR36 publication-title: Front Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01048 – ident: 3618_CR22 – volume: 11 start-page: 385 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 3618_CR38 publication-title: Arch Med Sci doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.50970 – volume: 50 start-page: 1376 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 3618_CR7 publication-title: J Clin Microbiol doi: 10.1128/JCM.05852-11 – ident: 3618_CR13 – volume: 39 start-page: 1269 issue: 4 year: 2021 ident: 3618_CR21 publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03286-w – volume: 8 start-page: 167 year: 2018 ident: 3618_CR37 publication-title: Front Cell Infect Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00167 – volume: 2 start-page: 16008 year: 2016 ident: 3618_CR4 publication-title: Nat Rev Dis Primers doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.8 – volume: 10 start-page: 174 year: 2012 ident: 3618_CR11 publication-title: J Transl Med doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-174 – volume: 54 start-page: 1627 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 3618_CR30 publication-title: Ann Med doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2085882 – volume: 18 start-page: 130 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 3618_CR9 publication-title: J Transl Med doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02282-3 – volume: 48 start-page: 191 issue: 3 year: 2020 ident: 3618_CR24 publication-title: Urolithiasis doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01146-w |
SSID | ssj0017837 |
Score | 2.4144084 |
Snippet | Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic... Background Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and... BackgroundUrolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and... Abstract Background Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 456 |
SubjectTerms | 2bRAD-M Adult Aged Annotations Bacteria - classification Bacteria - genetics Bacteria - isolation & purification Bacteria - metabolism Biological diversity Bladder Calculi, Urinary Catheters Causes of Community composition Comparative analysis Composition Demographic aspects Enzymes Female Females Functional analysis Gender Gender differences Genomes Health aspects Humans Kidney Pelvis - microbiology Kidneys Male Males Medical research Medicine, Experimental Microbiomes Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) Microbiota - genetics Microorganisms Middle Aged Nephrolithiasis Pelvis Predictions Renal pelvis urine RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics Sex Factors Sex factors in disease Statistical analysis Stone Taxonomy Urinary tract diseases Urine Urobiome Urogenital system Urolithiasis Urolithiasis - microbiology Urolithiasis - urine Veganism |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQJSQuiDcpBRmExAFZTWI7sY_LoypI5VCo1JvlZ1lpm62aDRL_nhknu9qIAxdu0Xrymofnm834MyFvpROQ15Nj4DyRCeEFg7QQWUxV5XyQtsw822ffmtML8fVSXu5t9YU9YSM98Ki445A41045gN4S_Cs5H1sbdUpVAzOry8t8Iedti6np-0ELddd2iYxqjnuYhRtsthUMZuxKMTlLQ5mt_-85eS8pzRsm9zLQyQNyf4KOdDE-8kNyJ3aPyN1xM8nfj4lZUL_bVJCuE72G-1DbBZpiPryNePpNXP1a9nTI_EvXEQWHbrmyuBJ5RREKRopAFmAhxab4K1q788UndvaEXJx8_vHxlE3bJzAPRd-GOR65C7GtG22RKKoJAcnpYpQx8bJOjdDc6VYHyOBJClt7BfDECyHq0oYk-VNy0MFNnxNahuRs8DVcsBRVTI7XEOhW6cBd1F4V5P1Wm-ZmZMkwubpQjRl1b0D3JuveyIJ8QIXvJJHhOv8AdjeT3c2_7F6QN2gugxwWHTbJXNmh782X7-dmoSr8OqpaXZB3k1Bag-G8ndYcwFsh7dVM8mgmCUHm58NbrzBTkPeGV4AmK2S8K8jr3TCeiY1rXVwPWQaMIaDqLMiz0Yl27821RMBXFkTN3GummPlIt_yZKcABx3NA3urwf6jyBblXY2jgn-XNETnY3A7xJUCtjXuVo-oPCcklgA priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELfGEBIviO8FBjIIiQdkSGIncR4QKh_TQCoPg0p7s_xZKnXpaBrE_nvu3KQsYuItqs9xcr7z_a45_0zIi8IIiOvBMDAez4SwgkFY8MyHLDPWFTqNPNvTr-XxTHw5LU73yHDcUa_A9srUDs-Tmq2Xr3__vHgHDv82Orws37SwxpZYSisYrMeZZMU1ch0iU4WOOhV_vypUkI0NG2eu7DcKTpHD_9-V-lKoGpdRXopLR7fJrR5Q0snWAu6QPd_cJTe2R0xe3CNqQu3uqEG6CvQMxqG6cTT4eLn22P3cL38tWtpFVqYzj4Jds1hq3J-8pAgQPUV4C2CRYqn8nObmZPKRTe-T2dGn7x-OWX-oArOQCm6Y4Z4b56u8rDXSR5XOIWWd94UPPM1DKWpu6qp2ENdDIXRuJYAWK4TIU-1CwR-Q_QYGPSA0dcFoZ3O4YSoyHwzPwf21rB03vrYyIa8GbarzLXeGijmHLNVW9wp0r6LuVZGQ96jwnSTyXscfVuu56t1IucB5baSBRKyA1SYY6yvt6xCyEuKsgSGf43QpZLZosHRmrru2VZ-_naiJzPCbqazqhLzshcIKJs7qficCvBWSYY0kD0eS4Hp23DxYhRosV_EMMGaGPHgJebZrxp5Yztb4VRdlYDIE5KIJebg1ot1787pAGJgmRI7Ma6SYcUuz-BGJwQHdc8Dj8tH_n-sxuZmj0eOf4-Uh2d-sO_8EoNXGPI3-8gc3tR-W priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | A comparison of male and female renal pelvis urobiome of unilateral stone formers using 2bRAD-M |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39506630 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3126416767 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3125494114 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11539328 https://doaj.org/article/df339b8b0865425fbce7ae9ff16284b8 |
Volume | 24 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9NAEF_0DsEX8dvoWVYRfJDlkuwm2TxJq3ecQg-pHhRflv2shV5am1bwv3dmm9YLgi-hdCfdZnY-N7O_IeRNYQT49WAYCI9nQljBwC145kOWGesKnUac7fFleXElPk-Labfh1nZllXubGA21W1rcIz_lGbjuDOHF3q9-MuwahW9XuxYat8kxQpdhSVc1PSRcWQXZ1_6gjCxPW7DFJZbcCgZ2O5Os6DmjiNn_r2W-4Zr6ZZM3_ND5fXKvCyDpcLfiD8gt3zwkd3YtJX8_ImpI7aG1IF0Geg3zUN04Gnz8uPZ4-8ovfs1buo0oTNceCbfNfKHxPPKCYkDoKYazEBxSLI2f0dxMhh_Z-DG5Oj_79uGCdU0UmIXUb8MM99w4X-VlrREuqnQOIeq8L3zgaR5KUXNTV7UDPx4KoXMrIUixQog81S4U_Ak5amDSZ4SmLhjtbA4_mIrMB8NzUHcta8eNr61MyLs9N9Vqh5WhYo4hS7XjvQLeq8h7VSRkhAw_UCLOdfxiuZ6pTm2UC5zXRhpIvAqwLsFYX2lfh5CV4FcNTPkal0shkkWDpTIzvW1b9enrRA1lhu9IZVUn5G1HFJawcFZ3Jw_gqRD8qkd50qMEVbP94b1UqE7VW_VXMBPy6jCMd2L5WuOX20gDiyEg90zI050QHZ6b1wWGfWlCZE-8eozpjzTzHxEIHKJ5DvG3fP7___WC3M1R6HEzvDwhR5v11r-EUGpjBlFfBuR4dHb5ZTKIGxJwHQsJ18no-x9jBiDh |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEF5VqRBcUHmbFlgQiAOyanvXjn1AKKWtEtpEKLRSb9t9hkipE-IE1D_Fb2TGj1ALiVtvVnbsjWdn5pvxzs4Q8jZWHHDdKR-Ex_qca-4DLFjfujBU2sQyKOtsD0dJ_5x_uYgvtsjv5iwMplU2NrE01Gau8Rv5PgsBukMsL_Zp8cPHrlG4u9q00KjE4sRe_4KQrfg4OIT1fRdFx0dnn_t-3VXA1xALrXzFLFPGdqMkk1g_KTEGa7ZZG1vHgsglPGMq62YGgM3FXEY6BdTWnPMokMZhlwgw-ducQSjTIdsHR6Ov482-RRfiveZoTprsF2D9E0zy5T4gRZj6cQv-yi4B_2LBDTBsJ2reQL7jHXK_dllpr5KxB2TL5g_JnaqJ5fUjInpUb5oZ0rmjVzAPlbmhzpaXS4u3L-zs57Sg67Lu05VFwnU-nUk8AT2j6IJaig40uKMUk_EnNFLj3qE_fEzOb4XBT0gnh0mfERoYp6TRETww4KF1ikVgYGSaGaZsplOPfGi4KRZVdQ5RRjVpIireC-C9KHkvYo8cIMM3lFhZu_xhvpyIWlGFcYxlKlUQ6sVgz5zStitt5lyYAJIrmPINLpfA2hk5JudM5LooxODbWPTSEHdl027mkfc1kZvDwmlZn3WAt8JyWy3KvRYlKLduDzdSIWrjUoi_quCR15thvBMT5nI7X5c0sBgcol2PPK2EaPPeLIvR0Qw8krbEq8WY9kg-_V6WHof4gYHHnz7___96Re72z4an4nQwOtkl9yJUAPwUn-yRzmq5ti_AkVupl7X2UHJ52wr7B61oWdQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+comparison+of+male+and+female+renal+pelvis+urobiome+of+unilateral+stone+formers+using+2bRAD-M&rft.jtitle=BMC+microbiology&rft.au=Sen-Yuan%2C+Hong&rft.au=Lin-Tao%2C+Miao&rft.au=Yuan-Yuan%2C+Yang&rft.au=Shao-Gang%2C+Wang&rft.date=2024-11-06&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2180&rft.volume=24&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12866-024-03618-5 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon |