A comparison of male and female renal pelvis urobiome of unilateral stone formers using 2bRAD-M

Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanism...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC microbiology Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 456 - 12
Main Authors Hong, Sen-Yuan, Miao, Lin-Tao, Yang, Yuan-Yuan, Wang, Shao-Gang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 06.11.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females. Renal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF). Through the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups. Variations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences.
AbstractList Abstract Background Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females. Methods Renal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF). Results Through the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups. Conclusion Variations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences.
BackgroundUrolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females.MethodsRenal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF).ResultsThrough the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups.ConclusionVariations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences.
Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females.BACKGROUNDUrolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females.Renal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF).METHODSRenal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF).Through the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups.RESULTSThrough the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups.Variations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences.CONCLUSIONVariations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences.
Background Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females. Methods Renal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF). Results Through the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups. Conclusion Variations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences. Keywords: Urolithiasis, Renal pelvis urine, Urobiome, Gender, 2bRAD-M
Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females. Renal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF). Through the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups. Variations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences.
Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic burden. While men exhibit an incidence rate nearly twice that of women, this gender disparity is gradually diminishing. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this condition remain incompletely elucidated. The identification of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) has provided a fresh perspective on urolithiasis. This study aimed to analyze the urobiome of unilateral stone formers in the renal pelvis and evaluate the variations in microbial diversity and community composition between males and females. Renal pelvis urine samples were obtained from a cohort of 21 male and 9 female patients and subsequently subjected to taxonomic and functional analysis using 2bRAD sequencing for Microbiome (2bRAD-M). The collected samples were categorized into four distinct groups, namely the stone side of males (SM), stone side of females (SF), non-stone side of males (NSM), and non-stone side of females (NSF). Through the application of beta diversity analysis, dissimilarity was observed between NSM and NSF. Additionally, NSF exhibited a higher abundance of microbial populations, and a total of 29 distinct species were identified as differentially present between NSM and NSF using LEfSe. Lactobacillus iners, Atopobium deltae, Lawsonella clevelandensis, and Meyerozyma guilliermondii exhibited enrichment in the SF group compared to the SM group. Furthermore, we identified distinct species that differed between the SM and NSM groups, as well as the SF and NSF groups. Besides, we conducted COG annotation and KEGG pathway predictions, revealing significant differences in urobiome function across the different groups. Variations in microbial community composition and predicted functions were observed among the various groups. Future research could potentially leverage the urobiome to personalize urolithiasis treatment based on individual microbial characteristics, taking into account gender-specific differences.
ArticleNumber 456
Audience Academic
Author Miao, Lin-Tao
Hong, Sen-Yuan
Wang, Shao-Gang
Yang, Yuan-Yuan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sen-Yuan
  surname: Hong
  fullname: Hong, Sen-Yuan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Lin-Tao
  surname: Miao
  fullname: Miao, Lin-Tao
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yuan-Yuan
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Yuan-Yuan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Shao-Gang
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Shao-Gang
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39506630$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkk1v1DAQhiNURD_gD3BAkbiUQ4q_Y5_Qqnx0pSKkAmfLccaLV4m92EkF_x7vblu6CPlga-bxa8_Me1odhRigql5idIGxFG8zJlKIBhHWICqwbPiT6gSzFjcES3T06Hxcnea8Rgi3krbPqmOqOBKCopNKL2obx41JPsdQR1ePZoDahL52sDsmCGaoNzDc-lzPKXY-jrAF5-AHM0Eq2TyVj9UuphFSgbIPq5p0N4v3zefn1VNnhgwv7vaz6vvHD98ur5rrL5-Wl4vrxnKmpqajQLseWiKUUS0Wou-RYByAg6OIOMEU7VSrek6w48wQKwWjljFGkOkdp2fVcq_bR7PWm-RHk37raLzeBWJaaZMmbwfQvaNUdbJDUnBGuOsstAaUc1gQyTpZtN7ttTZzN0JvIUylygPRw0zwP_Qq3mqMOVWUbBXO7xRS_DlDnvTos4VhMAHinDXFpJTNMGYFff0Puo5zKj3fUYJh0Yr2L7UqM9E-uFgetltRvZCYY6xkqwp18R-qrB5Gb8uMnC_xgwtvDi4UZoJf08rMOevl15tD9tXjrjy0495LBSB7wKaYcwL3gGCkt4bVe8PqYli9M6zm9A_yltn4
Cites_doi 10.1681/ASN.2018121241
10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.080
10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.048
10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.010
10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100753
10.1093/nar/28.1.33
10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60
10.1093/nar/28.1.27
10.1186/s12866-020-01992-4
10.1111/1471-0528.15920
10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6
10.1186/s13059-021-02576-9
10.1007/s40620-014-0064-1
10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.04.012
10.1186/s40168-017-0305-3
10.1038/s41598-017-02995-4
10.1007/s00192-021-04832-9
10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.009
10.3389/fcimb.2013.00041
10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.006
10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.069
10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.117
10.1186/s12866-020-01734-6
10.1038/s41467-018-03968-5
10.1186/s12967-022-03639-6
10.1038/s41598-019-41977-6
10.1128/JCM.02876-13
10.3389/fmicb.2020.01048
10.5114/aoms.2015.50970
10.1128/JCM.05852-11
10.1007/s00345-020-03286-w
10.3389/fcimb.2018.00167
10.1038/nrdp.2016.8
10.1186/1479-5876-10-174
10.1080/07853890.2022.2085882
10.1186/s12967-020-02282-3
10.1007/s00240-019-01146-w
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2024 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2024 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
ISR
3V.
7QL
7T7
7U9
7X7
7XB
88E
8FD
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
H94
HCIFZ
K9.
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7N
M7P
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12866-024-03618-5
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE - Academic


MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 1471-2180
EndPage 12
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_df339b8b0865425fbce7ae9ff16284b8
PMC11539328
A815119879
39506630
10_1186_s12866_024_03618_5
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China
  grantid: 82170778
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5VS
6J9
7X7
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
A8Z
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IGS
IHR
INH
INR
ISR
ITC
KQ8
LK5
LK8
M1P
M48
M7P
M7R
MM.
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
~02
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PMFND
3V.
7QL
7T7
7U9
7XB
8FD
8FK
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
H94
K9.
M7N
P64
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-b3e3bde7269a97166dd0645ee5ef302f6493b979d521f54a2c8643c44420adf53
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1471-2180
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:27:58 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:43:44 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 05:29:40 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:16:37 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:03:38 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:00:19 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 05:29:12 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:54:49 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:31:48 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords 2bRAD-M
Renal pelvis urine
Gender
Urobiome
Urolithiasis
Language English
License 2024. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c549t-b3e3bde7269a97166dd0645ee5ef302f6493b979d521f54a2c8643c44420adf53
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/3126416767?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 39506630
PQID 3126416767
PQPubID 42585
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_df339b8b0865425fbce7ae9ff16284b8
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11539328
proquest_miscellaneous_3125494114
proquest_journals_3126416767
gale_infotracmisc_A815119879
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A815119879
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A815119879
pubmed_primary_39506630
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_024_03618_5
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-11-06
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-11-06
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-11-06
  day: 06
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC microbiology
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Microbiol
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References AJ Wolfe (3618_CR7) 2012; 50
C Gottschick (3618_CR29) 2017; 5
EE Hilt (3618_CR8) 2014; 52
RA Dornbier (3618_CR24) 2020; 48
Z Sun (3618_CR12) 2022; 23
H Yu (3618_CR38) 2015; 11
JZ Xu (3618_CR30) 2022; 54
M Prochaska (3618_CR20) 2018; 200
P Wu (3618_CR37) 2018; 8
3618_CR22
F Liu (3618_CR9) 2020; 18
3618_CR25
SY Hong (3618_CR17) 2022; 20
S Nackeeran (3618_CR21) 2021; 39
MR D’Costa (3618_CR2) 2019; 30
JY Li (3618_CR19) 2010; 184
K Thomas-White (3618_CR35) 2018; 9
J Shoag (3618_CR3) 2014; 192
M Kanehisa (3618_CR16) 2000; 28
B Anglim (3618_CR34) 2022; 33
RL Tatusov (3618_CR15) 2000; 28
DE Fouts (3618_CR11) 2012; 10
F Liu (3618_CR26) 2020; 20
ML Neugent (3618_CR33) 2022; 3
T Chen (3618_CR39) 2017; 7
SR Khan (3618_CR4) 2016; 2
N Segata (3618_CR14) 2011; 12
TK Price (3618_CR31) 2020; 127
W Kwak (3618_CR36) 2020; 11
J Xie (3618_CR10) 2020; 20
I Sorokin (3618_CR1) 2017; 35
DA Lewis (3618_CR28) 2013; 3
3618_CR13
L Cappuccino (3618_CR27) 2014; 27
CD Scales Jr (3618_CR5) 2007; 177
PM Ferraro (3618_CR6) 2022; 42
G Tundo (3618_CR18) 2018; 200
A Zampini (3618_CR23) 2019; 9
3618_CR32
References_xml – volume: 30
  start-page: 1251
  issue: 7
  year: 2019
  ident: 3618_CR2
  publication-title: J Am Soc Nephrol
  doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018121241
– volume: 200
  start-page: 823
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 3618_CR20
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.080
– volume: 200
  start-page: 1273
  issue: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: 3618_CR18
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.048
– ident: 3618_CR25
  doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.010
– volume: 3
  start-page: 100753
  issue: 10
  year: 2022
  ident: 3618_CR33
  publication-title: Cell Rep Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100753
– volume: 28
  start-page: 33
  issue: 1
  year: 2000
  ident: 3618_CR15
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res
  doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.33
– volume: 12
  start-page: R60
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: 3618_CR14
  publication-title: Genome Biol
  doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60
– volume: 28
  start-page: 27
  issue: 1
  year: 2000
  ident: 3618_CR16
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res
  doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27
– volume: 20
  start-page: 336
  year: 2020
  ident: 3618_CR26
  publication-title: BMC Microbiol
  doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01992-4
– volume: 127
  start-page: 193
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 3618_CR31
  publication-title: BJOG
  doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15920
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1301
  issue: 9
  year: 2017
  ident: 3618_CR1
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6
– volume: 23
  start-page: 36
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 3618_CR12
  publication-title: Genome Biol
  doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02576-9
– volume: 27
  start-page: 117
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  ident: 3618_CR27
  publication-title: J Nephrol
  doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0064-1
– volume: 42
  start-page: 230
  issue: 2
  year: 2022
  ident: 3618_CR6
  publication-title: Semin Nephrol
  doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.04.012
– volume: 5
  start-page: 99
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 3618_CR29
  publication-title: Microbiome
  doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0305-3
– volume: 7
  start-page: 2594
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 3618_CR39
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02995-4
– volume: 33
  start-page: 2107
  issue: 8
  year: 2022
  ident: 3618_CR34
  publication-title: Int Urogynecol J
  doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04832-9
– volume: 184
  start-page: 2360
  issue: 6
  year: 2010
  ident: 3618_CR19
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.009
– volume: 3
  start-page: 41
  year: 2013
  ident: 3618_CR28
  publication-title: Front Cell Infect Microbiol
  doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00041
– ident: 3618_CR32
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.006
– volume: 177
  start-page: 979
  issue: 3
  year: 2007
  ident: 3618_CR5
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.069
– volume: 192
  start-page: 1440
  issue: 5
  year: 2014
  ident: 3618_CR3
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.117
– volume: 20
  start-page: 41
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 3618_CR10
  publication-title: BMC Microbiol
  doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01734-6
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1557
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 3618_CR35
  publication-title: Nat Commun
  doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03968-5
– volume: 20
  start-page: 431
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 3618_CR17
  publication-title: J Transl Med
  doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03639-6
– volume: 9
  start-page: 5425
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 3618_CR23
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41977-6
– volume: 52
  start-page: 871
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  ident: 3618_CR8
  publication-title: J Clin Microbiol
  doi: 10.1128/JCM.02876-13
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1048
  year: 2020
  ident: 3618_CR36
  publication-title: Front Microbiol
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01048
– ident: 3618_CR22
– volume: 11
  start-page: 385
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: 3618_CR38
  publication-title: Arch Med Sci
  doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.50970
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1376
  issue: 4
  year: 2012
  ident: 3618_CR7
  publication-title: J Clin Microbiol
  doi: 10.1128/JCM.05852-11
– ident: 3618_CR13
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1269
  issue: 4
  year: 2021
  ident: 3618_CR21
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03286-w
– volume: 8
  start-page: 167
  year: 2018
  ident: 3618_CR37
  publication-title: Front Cell Infect Microbiol
  doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00167
– volume: 2
  start-page: 16008
  year: 2016
  ident: 3618_CR4
  publication-title: Nat Rev Dis Primers
  doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.8
– volume: 10
  start-page: 174
  year: 2012
  ident: 3618_CR11
  publication-title: J Transl Med
  doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-174
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1627
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 3618_CR30
  publication-title: Ann Med
  doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2085882
– volume: 18
  start-page: 130
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 3618_CR9
  publication-title: J Transl Med
  doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02282-3
– volume: 48
  start-page: 191
  issue: 3
  year: 2020
  ident: 3618_CR24
  publication-title: Urolithiasis
  doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01146-w
SSID ssj0017837
Score 2.4144084
Snippet Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and economic...
Background Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and...
BackgroundUrolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social and...
Abstract Background Urolithiasis is a prevalent urological ailment characterized by increasing prevalence and recurrence rates, resulting in substantial social...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 456
SubjectTerms 2bRAD-M
Adult
Aged
Annotations
Bacteria - classification
Bacteria - genetics
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Bacteria - metabolism
Biological diversity
Bladder
Calculi, Urinary
Catheters
Causes of
Community composition
Comparative analysis
Composition
Demographic aspects
Enzymes
Female
Females
Functional analysis
Gender
Gender differences
Genomes
Health aspects
Humans
Kidney Pelvis - microbiology
Kidneys
Male
Males
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Microbiomes
Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)
Microbiota - genetics
Microorganisms
Middle Aged
Nephrolithiasis
Pelvis
Predictions
Renal pelvis urine
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
Sex Factors
Sex factors in disease
Statistical analysis
Stone
Taxonomy
Urinary tract diseases
Urine
Urobiome
Urogenital system
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis - microbiology
Urolithiasis - urine
Veganism
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQJSQuiDcpBRmExAFZTWI7sY_LoypI5VCo1JvlZ1lpm62aDRL_nhknu9qIAxdu0Xrymofnm834MyFvpROQ15Nj4DyRCeEFg7QQWUxV5XyQtsw822ffmtML8fVSXu5t9YU9YSM98Ki445A41045gN4S_Cs5H1sbdUpVAzOry8t8Iedti6np-0ELddd2iYxqjnuYhRtsthUMZuxKMTlLQ5mt_-85eS8pzRsm9zLQyQNyf4KOdDE-8kNyJ3aPyN1xM8nfj4lZUL_bVJCuE72G-1DbBZpiPryNePpNXP1a9nTI_EvXEQWHbrmyuBJ5RREKRopAFmAhxab4K1q788UndvaEXJx8_vHxlE3bJzAPRd-GOR65C7GtG22RKKoJAcnpYpQx8bJOjdDc6VYHyOBJClt7BfDECyHq0oYk-VNy0MFNnxNahuRs8DVcsBRVTI7XEOhW6cBd1F4V5P1Wm-ZmZMkwubpQjRl1b0D3JuveyIJ8QIXvJJHhOv8AdjeT3c2_7F6QN2gugxwWHTbJXNmh782X7-dmoSr8OqpaXZB3k1Bag-G8ndYcwFsh7dVM8mgmCUHm58NbrzBTkPeGV4AmK2S8K8jr3TCeiY1rXVwPWQaMIaDqLMiz0Yl27821RMBXFkTN3GummPlIt_yZKcABx3NA3urwf6jyBblXY2jgn-XNETnY3A7xJUCtjXuVo-oPCcklgA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELfGEBIviO8FBjIIiQdkSGIncR4QKh_TQCoPg0p7s_xZKnXpaBrE_nvu3KQsYuItqs9xcr7z_a45_0zIi8IIiOvBMDAez4SwgkFY8MyHLDPWFTqNPNvTr-XxTHw5LU73yHDcUa_A9srUDs-Tmq2Xr3__vHgHDv82Orws37SwxpZYSisYrMeZZMU1ch0iU4WOOhV_vypUkI0NG2eu7DcKTpHD_9-V-lKoGpdRXopLR7fJrR5Q0snWAu6QPd_cJTe2R0xe3CNqQu3uqEG6CvQMxqG6cTT4eLn22P3cL38tWtpFVqYzj4Jds1hq3J-8pAgQPUV4C2CRYqn8nObmZPKRTe-T2dGn7x-OWX-oArOQCm6Y4Z4b56u8rDXSR5XOIWWd94UPPM1DKWpu6qp2ENdDIXRuJYAWK4TIU-1CwR-Q_QYGPSA0dcFoZ3O4YSoyHwzPwf21rB03vrYyIa8GbarzLXeGijmHLNVW9wp0r6LuVZGQ96jwnSTyXscfVuu56t1IucB5baSBRKyA1SYY6yvt6xCyEuKsgSGf43QpZLZosHRmrru2VZ-_naiJzPCbqazqhLzshcIKJs7qficCvBWSYY0kD0eS4Hp23DxYhRosV_EMMGaGPHgJebZrxp5Yztb4VRdlYDIE5KIJebg1ot1787pAGJgmRI7Ma6SYcUuz-BGJwQHdc8Dj8tH_n-sxuZmj0eOf4-Uh2d-sO_8EoNXGPI3-8gc3tR-W
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title A comparison of male and female renal pelvis urobiome of unilateral stone formers using 2bRAD-M
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39506630
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3126416767
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3125494114
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11539328
https://doaj.org/article/df339b8b0865425fbce7ae9ff16284b8
Volume 24
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9NAEF_0DsEX8dvoWVYRfJDlkuwm2TxJq3ecQg-pHhRflv2shV5am1bwv3dmm9YLgi-hdCfdZnY-N7O_IeRNYQT49WAYCI9nQljBwC145kOWGesKnUac7fFleXElPk-Labfh1nZllXubGA21W1rcIz_lGbjuDOHF3q9-MuwahW9XuxYat8kxQpdhSVc1PSRcWQXZ1_6gjCxPW7DFJZbcCgZ2O5Os6DmjiNn_r2W-4Zr6ZZM3_ND5fXKvCyDpcLfiD8gt3zwkd3YtJX8_ImpI7aG1IF0Geg3zUN04Gnz8uPZ4-8ovfs1buo0oTNceCbfNfKHxPPKCYkDoKYazEBxSLI2f0dxMhh_Z-DG5Oj_79uGCdU0UmIXUb8MM99w4X-VlrREuqnQOIeq8L3zgaR5KUXNTV7UDPx4KoXMrIUixQog81S4U_Ak5amDSZ4SmLhjtbA4_mIrMB8NzUHcta8eNr61MyLs9N9Vqh5WhYo4hS7XjvQLeq8h7VSRkhAw_UCLOdfxiuZ6pTm2UC5zXRhpIvAqwLsFYX2lfh5CV4FcNTPkal0shkkWDpTIzvW1b9enrRA1lhu9IZVUn5G1HFJawcFZ3Jw_gqRD8qkd50qMEVbP94b1UqE7VW_VXMBPy6jCMd2L5WuOX20gDiyEg90zI050QHZ6b1wWGfWlCZE-8eozpjzTzHxEIHKJ5DvG3fP7___WC3M1R6HEzvDwhR5v11r-EUGpjBlFfBuR4dHb5ZTKIGxJwHQsJ18no-x9jBiDh
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEF5VqRBcUHmbFlgQiAOyanvXjn1AKKWtEtpEKLRSb9t9hkipE-IE1D_Fb2TGj1ALiVtvVnbsjWdn5pvxzs4Q8jZWHHDdKR-Ex_qca-4DLFjfujBU2sQyKOtsD0dJ_5x_uYgvtsjv5iwMplU2NrE01Gau8Rv5PgsBukMsL_Zp8cPHrlG4u9q00KjE4sRe_4KQrfg4OIT1fRdFx0dnn_t-3VXA1xALrXzFLFPGdqMkk1g_KTEGa7ZZG1vHgsglPGMq62YGgM3FXEY6BdTWnPMokMZhlwgw-ducQSjTIdsHR6Ov482-RRfiveZoTprsF2D9E0zy5T4gRZj6cQv-yi4B_2LBDTBsJ2reQL7jHXK_dllpr5KxB2TL5g_JnaqJ5fUjInpUb5oZ0rmjVzAPlbmhzpaXS4u3L-zs57Sg67Lu05VFwnU-nUk8AT2j6IJaig40uKMUk_EnNFLj3qE_fEzOb4XBT0gnh0mfERoYp6TRETww4KF1ikVgYGSaGaZsplOPfGi4KRZVdQ5RRjVpIireC-C9KHkvYo8cIMM3lFhZu_xhvpyIWlGFcYxlKlUQ6sVgz5zStitt5lyYAJIrmPINLpfA2hk5JudM5LooxODbWPTSEHdl027mkfc1kZvDwmlZn3WAt8JyWy3KvRYlKLduDzdSIWrjUoi_quCR15thvBMT5nI7X5c0sBgcol2PPK2EaPPeLIvR0Qw8krbEq8WY9kg-_V6WHof4gYHHnz7___96Re72z4an4nQwOtkl9yJUAPwUn-yRzmq5ti_AkVupl7X2UHJ52wr7B61oWdQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+comparison+of+male+and+female+renal+pelvis+urobiome+of+unilateral+stone+formers+using+2bRAD-M&rft.jtitle=BMC+microbiology&rft.au=Sen-Yuan%2C+Hong&rft.au=Lin-Tao%2C+Miao&rft.au=Yuan-Yuan%2C+Yang&rft.au=Shao-Gang%2C+Wang&rft.date=2024-11-06&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2180&rft.volume=24&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12866-024-03618-5
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon