Direct and Indirect Effects of Internal Control Weaknesses on Accrual Quality: Evidence from a Unique Canadian Regulatory Setting
Public disclosure about effectiveness of internal control systems is subject to much controversy in Canada, resulting in Canadian disclosures being made in Management Discussion and Analysis These disclosures are provided to investors without a definition of the weaknesses to be reported, without im...
Saved in:
Published in | Contemporary accounting research Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 675 - 707 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.06.2011
CAAA Canadian Academic Accounting Association |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0823-9150 1911-3846 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01058.x |
Cover
Abstract | Public disclosure about effectiveness of internal control systems is subject to much controversy in Canada, resulting in Canadian disclosures being made in Management Discussion and Analysis These disclosures are provided to investors without a definition of the weaknesses to be reported, without implementation effectiveness testing, with no direct management certification, and with no external audit of such disclosures. The authors use ordinary least squares regression and path analysis embedded in a structural model to examine the association between the strength of internal control and accrual quality in order to infer whether these disclosures are credible. The modest substitution effect implies that auditors cannot fully compensate for poor internal control by increased substantive work, which is per se evidence justifying some form of internal control disclosures for investors. Overall, their results suggest that lower cost SOX North disclosures are credible. This informs the cost-benefit debate facing regulators around the globe seeking alternatives to the costly US model of internal control reporting. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Public disclosure about effectiveness of internal control systems is subject to much controversy in Canada, resulting in Canadian disclosures being made in Management Discussion and Analysis These disclosures are provided to investors without a definition of the weaknesses to be reported, without implementation effectiveness testing, with no direct management certification, and with no external audit of such disclosures. The authors use ordinary least squares regression and path analysis embedded in a structural model to examine the association between the strength of internal control and accrual quality in order to infer whether these disclosures are credible. The modest substitution effect implies that auditors cannot fully compensate for poor internal control by increased substantive work, which is per se evidence justifying some form of internal control disclosures for investors. Overall, their results suggest that lower cost SOX North disclosures are credible. This informs the cost-benefit debate facing regulators around the globe seeking alternatives to the costly US model of internal control reporting. Public disclosure about effectiveness of internal control systems is subject to much controversy in Canada, resulting in Canadian disclosures being made in Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). These disclosures are provided to investors without a definition of the weaknesses to be reported, without implementation effectiveness testing, with no direct management certification, and with no external audit of such disclosures. The authors use ordinary least squares regression and path analysis embedded in a structural model to examine the association between the strength of internal control and accrual quality in order to infer whether these disclosures are credible. The modest substitution effect implies that auditors cannot fully compensate for poor internal control by increased substantive work, which is per se evidence justifying some form of internal control disclosures for investors. Overall, their results suggest that lower cost SOX North disclosures are credible. This informs the cost-benefit debate facing regulators around the globe seeking alternatives to the costly US model of internal control reporting. |
Author | Richardson, Gordon Lu, Hai Salterio, Steven |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hai surname: Lu fullname: Lu, Hai organization: University of Toronto – sequence: 2 givenname: Gordon surname: Richardson fullname: Richardson, Gordon organization: University of Toronto – sequence: 3 givenname: Steven surname: Salterio fullname: Salterio, Steven organization: Queen's University |
BackLink | http://www.econis.eu/PPNSET?PPN=667688919$$DView this record in ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
BookMark | eNqNUU1vEzEQtVCRSAu_AYsTlw32fnhtDkhRCKVSBPSLHC2vd7ZyurFb2wvJkX-Oly099FRL9tgzb96M5x2jI-ssIIQpmdO0PmznVFCaFbxk85wkb9oVn-9foNlj4AjNCM-LTNCKvELHIWwJIays-Qz9-Ww86IiVbfGZbafHquuSCdh1yRfBW9XjpbPRux5vQN1aCAFS2OKF1n5I0fN0mHj4iFe_TAtWA-6822GFr625HwAvlVWtURZfwM3Qq-j8AV9CjMbevEYvO9UHePNgT9D1l9XV8mu2_n56tlysM12Vgme8LXNaUNpWlBclo5qrLm91w0iZg9BFA03OKpqnGfBWkVqMH29YU3d1nZxdcYLeT7x33qWWQpQ7EzT0vbLghiApoVXJKiF4gr57At26YZxCkCKnhFSpjwR6O4FAO2uCvPNmp_xBMlYzzgUVCfFpQmjvQvDQSW2iimacpDJ9qihHCeVWjkrJsWE5Sij_SSj3iYA_Ifhf5BmpD7V_mx4Oz86Ty8XFarwmgmwiMCHC_pFA-VvJ6qKu5Obbqfxxxc8vyc-13BR_ATJwwwU |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1108_MAJ_10_2017_1687 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3733945 crossref_primary_10_1111_acfi_12633 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijau_12269 crossref_primary_10_1111_1911_3846_12312 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaccpubpol_2013_10_003 crossref_primary_10_1111_acfi_12837 crossref_primary_10_1111_jbfa_12363 crossref_primary_10_1111_1911_3838_12011 crossref_primary_10_1590_1808_057x20231692_en crossref_primary_10_1007_s11146_022_09909_w crossref_primary_10_1177_0312896217691079 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcae_2014_12_001 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2144239 crossref_primary_10_2308_jiar_51856 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_945590 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJMF_07_2018_0213 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ribaf_2024_102246 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1911_3846_2011_01102_x crossref_primary_10_1111_1911_3846_12563 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3450799 crossref_primary_10_2308_accr_51567 crossref_primary_10_1002_csr_1330 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bar_2024_101373 crossref_primary_10_1108_ARJ_12_2020_0382 crossref_primary_10_2308_accr_51449 crossref_primary_10_1108_ARLA_04_2017_0110 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaccpubpol_2015_12_006 crossref_primary_10_1080_00036846_2023_2267818 crossref_primary_10_1111_corg_12305 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14159706 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0234506 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2120378 crossref_primary_10_1111_1911_3838_12006 crossref_primary_10_1080_09638180_2018_1454336 crossref_primary_10_2308_AJPT_19_050 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacceco_2014_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1080_1540496X_2022_2128667 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2405187 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijau_12329 crossref_primary_10_1111_1911_3846_12653 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_intaccaudtax_2021_100401 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2266168 crossref_primary_10_1111_1911_3846_12053 crossref_primary_10_1590_1808_057x20231692_pt crossref_primary_10_3390_su12083197 crossref_primary_10_1108_JAAR_06_2020_0114 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1923310 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11142_016_9361_3 crossref_primary_10_1142_S1094406019500069 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acclit_2018_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfs_2023_101106 crossref_primary_10_33219_jsmef_2014_34_3_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pacfin_2021_101648 crossref_primary_10_1111_1911_3838_12237 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3827565 crossref_primary_10_2308_ajpt_50514 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bir_2020_10_010 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00187_022_00348_5 crossref_primary_10_1111_1911_3846_12859 crossref_primary_10_2308_accr_52197 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJAIM_02_2020_0020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacceco_2017_01_001 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1730242 crossref_primary_10_1111_1911_3846_12662 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2368000 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2589917 crossref_primary_10_1002_bse_2499 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_intacc_2017_01_007 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11156_016_0593_x crossref_primary_10_1108_PAR_01_2023_0013 crossref_primary_10_2308_jiar_52494 crossref_primary_10_2308_accr_52518 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcae_2020_100188 crossref_primary_10_1108_JFRA_05_2024_0312 crossref_primary_10_24142_rvc_n11a10 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcae_2021_100282 crossref_primary_10_5117_mab_99_136538 crossref_primary_10_1111_1911_3846_12309 |
Cites_doi | 10.1506/car.26.3.6 10.1016/S1815-5669(10)70028-X 10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.61 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x 10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.10.003 10.2308/aud.2006.25.1.99 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.06.003 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00259.x 10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.839 10.1002/9781118619179 10.1002/job.4030160303 10.2139/ssrn.1028620 10.2308/aud.2008.27.1.105 10.1080/00223980109603692 10.2139/ssrn.1592593 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.t01-1-00143.x 10.2308/accr.2009.84.4.1255 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00279.x 10.1177/0049124189017003004 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00198.x 10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.473 10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.10.001 10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35 10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.649 10.2307/2490397 10.1111/1475-679X.00026 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04617.x 10.2307/3003485 10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.217 10.2307/1882010 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01313.x 10.2139/ssrn.1548766 10.1506/4XR4-KT5V-E8CN-91GX 10.1506/car.25.1.9 10.1177/109442819921005 10.1002/job.4030110105 10.1506/car.26.2.9 10.1207/s15327906mbr2302_3 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.125 10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1141 10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.004 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2011 The Canadian Academic Accounting Association Copyright Canadian Academic Accounting Association Summer 2011 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2011 The Canadian Academic Accounting Association – notice: Copyright Canadian Academic Accounting Association Summer 2011 |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION OQ6 8BJ FQK JBE |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01058.x |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef ECONIS International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) |
DatabaseTitleList | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Business |
EISSN | 1911-3846 |
EndPage | 707 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2583586261 667688919 10_1111_j_1911_3846_2010_01058_x CARE1058 ark_67375_WNG_PT8QS0VL_W |
Genre | article Feature |
GeographicLocations | Canada United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Canada – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 1OB 1OC 1OL 29F 33P 3WU 4.4 50Y 50Z 52M 52O 52T 52U 52W 5GY 66C 6J9 702 7PT 7WY 7X1 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8A9 8FL 8FQ 8R4 8R5 8VB 930 A04 AABNI AAESR AAHQN AAIKC AAMMB AAMNL AAMNW AANHP AAONW AAOUF AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAYJJ AAZKR ABBNM ABCUV ABPPZ ABUWG ACAHQ ACBKW ACBWZ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACNCT ACPOU ACRPL ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEMA ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFKFF AFKRA AFWVQ AFZJQ AGQPQ AGXDD AHBTC AHQJS AI. AIAGR AIDQK AIDYY AIURR AKVCP ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ANIOZ ASPBG ASTYK AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BENPR BEZIV BKOMP BMKGK BNVMJ BPHCQ BQESF BROTX BRXPI BSCLL CAG CCPQU COF CS3 D-C D-D DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSSH DU5 DWQXO EBS EJD F00 F01 F21 FRNLG G-S G.N G50 GODZA GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH HGLYW HZ~ H~9 IX1 K1G K60 K6~ LATKE LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M0C M3D MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSSH MSFUL MSSSH MXFUL MXSSH N04 N06 NEJ NF~ NNB O66 O9- P2P P2W P2Y P4C PALCI PHGZM PHGZT PQBIZ PQBZA PQQKQ PROAC PUEGO Q.N Q2X QB0 QWB R.K RIWAO ROL RWL RX1 RXW SAMSI SUPJJ TAE TH9 U5U V8K VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WEBCB WIH WII WOHZO WSUWO WXSBR XSW XV2 ZL0 ~IA ~WP 3V. AAHHS ACCFJ AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AFYRF AIFKG AIWBW AJBDE EBU GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE RWI AAYXX CITATION OQ6 8BJ FQK JBE |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5498-8d421311d5183461c8af2dcb6042e9c3beb265122018da0793846b6b7f77220f3 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0823-9150 |
IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 13:06:44 EDT 2025 Fri Aug 15 19:41:42 EDT 2025 Sat Mar 08 16:10:43 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:29:31 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:23 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:21:06 EST 2025 Tue Sep 09 05:32:03 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5498-8d421311d5183461c8af2dcb6042e9c3beb265122018da0793846b6b7f77220f3 |
Notes | Accepted by Michel Magnan. We thank Joseph Carcello, Gus De Franco, Paul Griffin, Chris Hogan, Ole-Kristian Hope, Bill Kinney, David Lont, Sarah McVay, Thomas Scott, Dan Simunic, Michael Stein, Michael Welker, Michael Willenborg, Minlei Ye, two anonymous referees, and workshop participants at the University of British Columbia, University of Toronto, 2008 CAAA, 2008 AFAANZ, and 2010 EAA annual conferences for their suggestions. We acknowledge the financial support from Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Rotman school of Management, and CA-Queen's Centre for Governance. Richardson is grateful to KPMG for the financial support. Salterio is grateful to PricewaterhouseCooper and Thomas O'Neill for their financial support. We thank Yiwei Dou, Yanju Liu, Regan Schmidt, Kevin Jason Veenstra, Choong-Yuel Yoo, Youli Zou, Michael Sullivan, Qui Chen, and 18 recent Queen's BCOMM graduates from the classes of 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 for their research assistance. ArticleID:CARE1058 istex:18200E4D9F36A660538743869655865140BB29D5 ark:/67375/WNG-PT8QS0VL-W Accepted by Michel Magnan. We thank Joseph Carcello, Gus De Franco, Paul Griffin, Chris Hogan, Ole‐Kristian Hope, Bill Kinney, David Lont, Sarah McVay, Thomas Scott, Dan Simunic, Michael Stein, Michael Welker, Michael Willenborg, Minlei Ye, two anonymous referees, and workshop participants at the University of British Columbia, University of Toronto, 2008 CAAA, 2008 AFAANZ, and 2010 EAA annual conferences for their suggestions. We acknowledge the financial support from Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Rotman school of Management, and CA‐Queen’s Centre for Governance. Richardson is grateful to KPMG for the financial support. Salterio is grateful to PricewaterhouseCooper and Thomas O’Neill for their financial support. We thank Yiwei Dou, Yanju Liu, Regan Schmidt, Kevin Jason Veenstra, Choong‐Yuel Yoo, Youli Zou, Michael Sullivan, Qui Chen, and 18 recent Queen’s BCOMM graduates from the classes of 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 for their research assistance. SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1374495_code358565.pdf?abstractid=1374495&mirid=1 |
PQID | 921005311 |
PQPubID | 30817 |
PageCount | 33 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1015465998 proquest_journals_921005311 econis_primary_667688919 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1911_3846_2010_01058_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1911_3846_2010_01058_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1911_3846_2010_01058_x_CARE1058 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_PT8QS0VL_W |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | Summer 2011 (June) |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2011 text: Summer 2011 (June) |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: Toronto |
PublicationTitle | Contemporary accounting research |
PublicationYear | 2011 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd CAAA Canadian Academic Accounting Association |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: CAAA – name: Canadian Academic Accounting Association |
References | Comment, R., and G. Jarrell. 1991. The relative signaling power of Dutch-auction and fixed-price self-tender offers and open-market share repurchases. The Journal of Finance 46 (4): 1243-71. Khurana, I., and K. K. Raman. 2004. Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of big 4 vs. non-big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review 79 (2): 473-95. Feng, M., C. Li, and S. McVay. 2009. Internal control and management guidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 48 (1-2): 190-209. Hribar, P., and D. C. Nichols. 2007. The use of unsigned earnings quality measures in tests of earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (5): 1017-53. Arbuckle, J. L., and W. Wothke. 1999. Amos 4.0 user's guide. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation. Spence, M. 1973. Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (3): 355-74. Brannick, M. T. 1995. Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling. Journal of Organizational Behavior 16 (3): 201-13. Hogan, C., and M. Wilkins. 2008. Evidence on the audit risk model: Do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies? Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (1): 219-42. Roberts, P., and G. Beal. 2005. Understanding Disclosure Controls and Procedures: Helping CEOs and CFOs respond for the need for better disclosure. A risk management and governance board brief. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. Goodfellow, J., and A. Willis. 2006. Internal Control 2006: The next wave of certification - Guidance for management. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. Dechow, P., and I. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 35-59. Jöreskog, K. G., and D. Sörbom. 1984. LISREL-VI user's guide (3rd ed.). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software. Hay, D., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A Meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (1): 141-91. Chin, W. 1998. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly 22 (1): vii-xvi. Piotroski, J., and S. Srinivasan. 2008. Regulation and bonding: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the flow of international listing. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (2): 383-425. Canadian Securities Administrators. 2004. National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees. Toronto, ON: OSCB. Simunic, D. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1): 161-90. Griffin, P.A., D. Lont, and Y. Sun. 2008. Corporate governance and audit fees: Evidence of countervailing relations. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 4 (1): 18-49. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, W. Kinney, Jr, and R. LaFond. 2008. The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality. The Accounting Review 83 (1): 217-50. Chau, P. 1997. Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sciences 28 (2): 309-34. Bentler, P., and T. Raykov. 2000. On measures of explained variance in nonrecursive structural equation models. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (1): 125-31. Jamal, K. 2009. Discussion of the use of remedial tactics in negligence litigation. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (3): 789-95. Prawitt, D., J. Smith, and D. Wood. 2009. Internal audit quality and earnings management. The Accounting Review 84 (4): 1255-80. Wong, C., and K. Law. 1999. Testing reciprocal relations by non-recursive structural equation models using cross-sectional data. Organizational Research Methods 2 (1): 69-87. Goh, B. 2009. Audit committees, boards of directors, and remediation of material weaknesses in internal control. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (2): 549-79. Felix, W. Jr, A. Gramling, and M. Maletta. 2001. The contribution of internal audit as a determinant of external audit fees and factors influencing this contribution. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (3): 513-34. Altman, E. 1968. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance 23 (4): 589-609. Bollen, K 1989a. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley. Ross, S. 1977. The determination of financial structure: The incentive signaling approach. The Bell Journal of Economics 8 (1): 23-40. Doyle, J., W. Ge, and S. McVay. 2007b. Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 193-223. Willis, A. 2008. 20 questions directors should ask about management discussion & analysis, 2nd ed. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. Salterio, S., and R. Schmidt. 2007. Management's evaluation of design effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting: Weak regulation and inconsistent compliance. CA-Queen's Centre for Governance. Kingston ON. October. business.queensu.ca/centres/CA-QCG/centre_reports. Schaubroeck, J. 1990. Investigating reciprocal causation in organizational behavior research. Journal of Organizational Behavior 11 (1): 17-28. Kinney, W., and R. Martin. 1994. Does auditing reduce bias in financial reporting? A review of audit-related adjustment studies Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 13 (1): 149-56. Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review 80 (2): 649-75. Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2005. The market pricing of accrual quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (2): 295-327. Lance, C., J. Cornwell, and S. Mulaik. 1988. Limited information parameter estimates for latent or mixed manifest and latent variables models. Multivariate Behavioral Research 23 (2): 171-87. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, and W. Kinney, Jr. 2007. The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 166-92. Raghunanda, K., and D. Rama. 2006. SOX Section 404 material weakness disclosures and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25 (1): 99-114. Bollen, K. 1989b. A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research 17 (3): 303-16. Doyle, J., W. Ge, and S. McVay. 2007a. Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. The Accounting Review 82 (5): 1141-70. Larcker, D., and S. Richardson. 2004. Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (3): 625-58. Hoitash, R., U. Hoitash, and J. Bedard. 2008. Internal control quality and audit pricing under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27 (1): 105-26. McNichols, M. 2002. Discussion of The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (supplement): 61-69. Kline, T., and J. Klammer. 2001. Path model analyzed with ordinary least squares multiple regression versus LISREL. Journal of Psychology 135 (2): 213-25. Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. 2006. The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition. Journal of Accounting Research 44 (2): 207-42. Hoitash, U., R. Hoitash, and J. C. Bedard. 2009. Corporate governance and internal control over financial reporting: A comparison of regulatory regimes. The Accounting Review 84 (3): 839-67. 1968; 23 1990; 11 2009; 84 2000; 85 1989a 2008; 4 2009; 48 2001; 135 2005b 2006; 23 2005a 1991; 46 1973; 87 2000 2008; 27 2006; 25 2004; 79 2008; 25 1984 2007a; 82 2005; 39 2004; 42 1995; 16 2006a 2010 2002; 77 2009 1997 2008 1997; 28 2007 2006 2005; 80 2005 2004 1999; 2 2002 1989b; 17 1998; 22 2009; 26 2007b; 44 1999 1980; 18 2006; 44 1988; 23 1994; 13 2008; 46 2001; 39 2008; 83 2007; 44 2007; 45 1977; 8 e_1_2_9_31_1 e_1_2_9_52_1 e_1_2_9_50_1 e_1_2_9_10_1 e_1_2_9_35_1 e_1_2_9_33_1 e_1_2_9_54_1 Chin W (e_1_2_9_18_1) 1998; 22 e_1_2_9_14_1 e_1_2_9_39_1 e_1_2_9_16_1 e_1_2_9_37_1 e_1_2_9_58_1 e_1_2_9_41_1 e_1_2_9_20_1 Roberts P. (e_1_2_9_53_1) 2005 e_1_2_9_22_1 e_1_2_9_45_1 e_1_2_9_24_1 e_1_2_9_43_1 e_1_2_9_8_1 e_1_2_9_6_1 e_1_2_9_60_1 e_1_2_9_2_1 Arbuckle J. L. (e_1_2_9_4_1) 1999 e_1_2_9_26_1 e_1_2_9_49_1 e_1_2_9_28_1 e_1_2_9_47_1 Jöreskog K. G. (e_1_2_9_38_1) 1984 e_1_2_9_30_1 e_1_2_9_51_1 e_1_2_9_11_1 e_1_2_9_34_1 e_1_2_9_57_1 e_1_2_9_13_1 e_1_2_9_32_1 e_1_2_9_55_1 Thompson B (e_1_2_9_61_1) 2000 e_1_2_9_15_1 e_1_2_9_17_1 e_1_2_9_36_1 e_1_2_9_59_1 e_1_2_9_19_1 Salterio S. (e_1_2_9_56_1) 2007 e_1_2_9_42_1 e_1_2_9_63_1 Canadian Securities Administrators (e_1_2_9_12_1) 2004 e_1_2_9_21_1 e_1_2_9_46_1 e_1_2_9_23_1 e_1_2_9_44_1 e_1_2_9_7_1 e_1_2_9_5_1 e_1_2_9_3_1 Willis A (e_1_2_9_62_1) 2008 Kinney W. (e_1_2_9_40_1) 1994; 13 Goodfellow J. (e_1_2_9_29_1) 2006 e_1_2_9_9_1 e_1_2_9_25_1 e_1_2_9_27_1 e_1_2_9_48_1 |
References_xml | – reference: Arbuckle, J. L., and W. Wothke. 1999. Amos 4.0 user's guide. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation. – reference: Khurana, I., and K. K. Raman. 2004. Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of big 4 vs. non-big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review 79 (2): 473-95. – reference: Chin, W. 1998. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly 22 (1): vii-xvi. – reference: Hoitash, U., R. Hoitash, and J. C. Bedard. 2009. Corporate governance and internal control over financial reporting: A comparison of regulatory regimes. The Accounting Review 84 (3): 839-67. – reference: Lance, C., J. Cornwell, and S. Mulaik. 1988. Limited information parameter estimates for latent or mixed manifest and latent variables models. Multivariate Behavioral Research 23 (2): 171-87. – reference: McNichols, M. 2002. Discussion of The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (supplement): 61-69. – reference: Wong, C., and K. Law. 1999. Testing reciprocal relations by non-recursive structural equation models using cross-sectional data. Organizational Research Methods 2 (1): 69-87. – reference: Roberts, P., and G. Beal. 2005. Understanding Disclosure Controls and Procedures: Helping CEOs and CFOs respond for the need for better disclosure. A risk management and governance board brief. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. – reference: Chau, P. 1997. Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sciences 28 (2): 309-34. – reference: Raghunanda, K., and D. Rama. 2006. SOX Section 404 material weakness disclosures and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25 (1): 99-114. – reference: Spence, M. 1973. Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (3): 355-74. – reference: Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, and W. Kinney, Jr. 2007. The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 166-92. – reference: Bollen, K 1989a. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley. – reference: Larcker, D., and S. Richardson. 2004. Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research 42 (3): 625-58. – reference: Doyle, J., W. Ge, and S. McVay. 2007a. Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. The Accounting Review 82 (5): 1141-70. – reference: Kinney, W., and R. Martin. 1994. Does auditing reduce bias in financial reporting? A review of audit-related adjustment studies Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 13 (1): 149-56. – reference: Bollen, K. 1989b. A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research 17 (3): 303-16. – reference: Canadian Securities Administrators. 2004. National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees. Toronto, ON: OSCB. – reference: Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. 2006. The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition. Journal of Accounting Research 44 (2): 207-42. – reference: Felix, W. Jr, A. Gramling, and M. Maletta. 2001. The contribution of internal audit as a determinant of external audit fees and factors influencing this contribution. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (3): 513-34. – reference: Hoitash, R., U. Hoitash, and J. Bedard. 2008. Internal control quality and audit pricing under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27 (1): 105-26. – reference: Bentler, P., and T. Raykov. 2000. On measures of explained variance in nonrecursive structural equation models. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (1): 125-31. – reference: Feng, M., C. Li, and S. McVay. 2009. Internal control and management guidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 48 (1-2): 190-209. – reference: Willis, A. 2008. 20 questions directors should ask about management discussion & analysis, 2nd ed. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. – reference: Prawitt, D., J. Smith, and D. Wood. 2009. Internal audit quality and earnings management. The Accounting Review 84 (4): 1255-80. – reference: Griffin, P.A., D. Lont, and Y. Sun. 2008. Corporate governance and audit fees: Evidence of countervailing relations. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 4 (1): 18-49. – reference: Salterio, S., and R. Schmidt. 2007. Management's evaluation of design effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting: Weak regulation and inconsistent compliance. CA-Queen's Centre for Governance. Kingston ON. October. business.queensu.ca/centres/CA-QCG/centre_reports. – reference: Comment, R., and G. Jarrell. 1991. The relative signaling power of Dutch-auction and fixed-price self-tender offers and open-market share repurchases. The Journal of Finance 46 (4): 1243-71. – reference: Dechow, P., and I. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 35-59. – reference: Doyle, J., W. Ge, and S. McVay. 2007b. Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (1-2): 193-223. – reference: Piotroski, J., and S. Srinivasan. 2008. Regulation and bonding: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the flow of international listing. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (2): 383-425. – reference: Goh, B. 2009. Audit committees, boards of directors, and remediation of material weaknesses in internal control. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (2): 549-79. – reference: Kline, T., and J. Klammer. 2001. Path model analyzed with ordinary least squares multiple regression versus LISREL. Journal of Psychology 135 (2): 213-25. – reference: Hogan, C., and M. Wilkins. 2008. Evidence on the audit risk model: Do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies? Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (1): 219-42. – reference: Goodfellow, J., and A. Willis. 2006. Internal Control 2006: The next wave of certification - Guidance for management. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. – reference: Jamal, K. 2009. Discussion of the use of remedial tactics in negligence litigation. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (3): 789-95. – reference: Jöreskog, K. G., and D. Sörbom. 1984. LISREL-VI user's guide (3rd ed.). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software. – reference: Hay, D., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A Meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (1): 141-91. – reference: Schaubroeck, J. 1990. Investigating reciprocal causation in organizational behavior research. Journal of Organizational Behavior 11 (1): 17-28. – reference: Brannick, M. T. 1995. Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling. Journal of Organizational Behavior 16 (3): 201-13. – reference: Ross, S. 1977. The determination of financial structure: The incentive signaling approach. The Bell Journal of Economics 8 (1): 23-40. – reference: Hribar, P., and D. C. Nichols. 2007. The use of unsigned earnings quality measures in tests of earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (5): 1017-53. – reference: Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review 80 (2): 649-75. – reference: Altman, E. 1968. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance 23 (4): 589-609. – reference: Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., D. Collins, W. Kinney, Jr, and R. LaFond. 2008. The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality. The Accounting Review 83 (1): 217-50. – reference: Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2005. The market pricing of accrual quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (2): 295-327. – reference: Simunic, D. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1): 161-90. – year: 2009 – volume: 25 start-page: 219 issue: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 42 article-title: Evidence on the audit risk model: Do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies? publication-title: Contemporary Accounting Research – year: 2005 – volume: 23 start-page: 589 issue: 4 year: 1968 end-page: 609 article-title: Financial ratios, discriminant analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy publication-title: The Journal of Finance – volume: 42 start-page: 625 issue: 3 year: 2004 end-page: 58 article-title: Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance publication-title: Journal of Accounting Research – volume: 25 start-page: 99 issue: 1 year: 2006 end-page: 114 article-title: SOX Section 404 material weakness disclosures and audit fees publication-title: Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory – volume: 4 start-page: 18 issue: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 49 article-title: Corporate governance and audit fees: Evidence of countervailing relations publication-title: Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics – volume: 77 start-page: 61 issue: supplement year: 2002 end-page: 69 article-title: Discussion of The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors publication-title: The Accounting Review – volume: 77 start-page: 35 issue: Supplement year: 2002 end-page: 59 article-title: The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors publication-title: The Accounting Review – volume: 39 start-page: 295 issue: 2 year: 2005 end-page: 327 article-title: The market pricing of accrual quality publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics – volume: 45 start-page: 1017 issue: 5 year: 2007 end-page: 53 article-title: The use of unsigned earnings quality measures in tests of earnings management publication-title: Journal of Accounting Research – volume: 39 start-page: 513 issue: 3 year: 2001 end-page: 34 article-title: The contribution of internal audit as a determinant of external audit fees and factors influencing this contribution publication-title: Journal of Accounting Research – volume: 82 start-page: 1141 issue: 5 year: 2007a end-page: 70 article-title: Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting publication-title: The Accounting Review – volume: 23 start-page: 171 issue: 2 year: 1988 end-page: 87 article-title: Limited information parameter estimates for latent or mixed manifest and latent variables models publication-title: Multivariate Behavioral Research – volume: 83 start-page: 217 issue: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 50 article-title: The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality publication-title: The Accounting Review – year: 2005b – volume: 18 start-page: 161 issue: 1 year: 1980 end-page: 90 article-title: The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence publication-title: Journal of Accounting Research – volume: 84 start-page: 1255 issue: 4 year: 2009 end-page: 80 article-title: Internal audit quality and earnings management publication-title: The Accounting Review – volume: 11 start-page: 17 issue: 1 year: 1990 end-page: 28 article-title: Investigating reciprocal causation in organizational behavior research publication-title: Journal of Organizational Behavior – volume: 84 start-page: 839 issue: 3 year: 2009 end-page: 67 article-title: Corporate governance and internal control over financial reporting: A comparison of regulatory regimes publication-title: The Accounting Review – volume: 22 start-page: vii issue: 1 year: 1998 end-page: xvi article-title: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling publication-title: MIS Quarterly – year: 2008 – volume: 135 start-page: 213 issue: 2 year: 2001 end-page: 25 article-title: Path model analyzed with ordinary least squares multiple regression versus LISREL publication-title: Journal of Psychology – year: 2004 – year: 1997 – volume: 87 start-page: 355 issue: 3 year: 1973 end-page: 74 article-title: Job market signaling publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Economics – year: 1989a – volume: 46 start-page: 383 issue: 2 year: 2008 end-page: 425 article-title: Regulation and bonding: The Sarbanes‐Oxley Act and the flow of international listing publication-title: Journal of Accounting Research – volume: 28 start-page: 309 issue: 2 year: 1997 end-page: 34 article-title: Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach publication-title: Decision Sciences – volume: 44 start-page: 166 issue: 1–2 year: 2007 end-page: 92 article-title: The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX‐mandated audits publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics – volume: 2 start-page: 69 issue: 1 year: 1999 end-page: 87 article-title: Testing reciprocal relations by non‐recursive structural equation models using cross‐sectional data publication-title: Organizational Research Methods – volume: 85 start-page: 125 issue: 1 year: 2000 end-page: 31 article-title: On measures of explained variance in nonrecursive structural equation models publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology – year: 2005a – volume: 44 start-page: 193 issue: 1–2 year: 2007b end-page: 223 article-title: Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics – volume: 17 start-page: 303 issue: 3 year: 1989b end-page: 16 article-title: A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models publication-title: Sociological Methods and Research – volume: 8 start-page: 23 issue: 1 year: 1977 end-page: 40 article-title: The determination of financial structure: The incentive signaling approach publication-title: The Bell Journal of Economics – year: 2007 – volume: 27 start-page: 105 issue: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 26 article-title: Internal control quality and audit pricing under the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act publication-title: Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory – start-page: 261 year: 2000 end-page: 84 – year: 2006a – volume: 26 start-page: 789 issue: 3 year: 2009 end-page: 95 article-title: Discussion of the use of remedial tactics in negligence litigation publication-title: Contemporary Accounting Research – volume: 46 start-page: 1243 issue: 4 year: 1991 end-page: 71 article-title: The relative signaling power of Dutch‐auction and fixed‐price self‐tender offers and open‐market share repurchases publication-title: The Journal of Finance – year: 2010 – volume: 48 start-page: 190 issue: 1–2 year: 2009 end-page: 209 article-title: Internal control and management guidance publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics – year: 1984 – volume: 44 start-page: 207 issue: 2 year: 2006 end-page: 42 article-title: The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition publication-title: Journal of Accounting Research – year: 2002 – year: 2006 – volume: 13 start-page: 149 issue: 1 year: 1994 end-page: 56 article-title: Does auditing reduce bias in financial reporting? A review of audit‐related adjustment studies publication-title: Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory – volume: 16 start-page: 201 issue: 3 year: 1995 end-page: 13 article-title: Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling publication-title: Journal of Organizational Behavior – volume: 23 start-page: 141 issue: 1 year: 2006 end-page: 91 article-title: Audit fees: A Meta‐analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes publication-title: Contemporary Accounting Research – volume: 80 start-page: 649 issue: 2 year: 2005 end-page: 75 article-title: Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis publication-title: The Accounting Review – volume: 26 start-page: 549 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 79 article-title: Audit committees, boards of directors, and remediation of material weaknesses in internal control publication-title: Contemporary Accounting Research – volume: 79 start-page: 473 issue: 2 year: 2004 end-page: 95 article-title: Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of big 4 vs. non‐big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo‐American countries publication-title: The Accounting Review – year: 1999 – volume-title: National Instrument 52‐110 Audit Committees year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_9_12_1 – volume: 22 start-page: vii issue: 1 year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_9_18_1 article-title: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling publication-title: MIS Quarterly – ident: e_1_2_9_37_1 doi: 10.1506/car.26.3.6 – ident: e_1_2_9_3_1 – volume-title: 20 questions directors should ask about management discussion & analysis year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_9_62_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_31_1 doi: 10.1016/S1815-5669(10)70028-X – ident: e_1_2_9_48_1 doi: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.61 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x – ident: e_1_2_9_43_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_23_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.10.003 – ident: e_1_2_9_51_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_52_1 doi: 10.2308/aud.2006.25.1.99 – ident: e_1_2_9_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.06.003 – ident: e_1_2_9_16_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_36_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00259.x – ident: e_1_2_9_35_1 doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.839 – volume-title: Internal Control 2006: The next wave of certification – Guidance for management year: 2006 ident: e_1_2_9_29_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_9_1 doi: 10.1002/9781118619179 – ident: e_1_2_9_11_1 doi: 10.1002/job.4030160303 – ident: e_1_2_9_30_1 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1028620 – ident: e_1_2_9_27_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_55_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_34_1 doi: 10.2308/aud.2008.27.1.105 – ident: e_1_2_9_42_1 doi: 10.1080/00223980109603692 – ident: e_1_2_9_47_1 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1592593 – start-page: 261 volume-title: Reading and Understanding More Multivariate Statistics year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_9_61_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_41_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_45_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.t01-1-00143.x – ident: e_1_2_9_50_1 doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.4.1255 – ident: e_1_2_9_49_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00279.x – ident: e_1_2_9_10_1 doi: 10.1177/0049124189017003004 – ident: e_1_2_9_7_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00198.x – ident: e_1_2_9_39_1 doi: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.473 – ident: e_1_2_9_14_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_5_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.10.001 – ident: e_1_2_9_20_1 doi: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35 – ident: e_1_2_9_44_1 doi: 10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.649 – ident: e_1_2_9_59_1 doi: 10.2307/2490397 – ident: e_1_2_9_24_1 doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.00026 – ident: e_1_2_9_19_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04617.x – volume-title: LISREL‐VI user’s guide year: 1984 ident: e_1_2_9_38_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_54_1 doi: 10.2307/3003485 – ident: e_1_2_9_6_1 doi: 10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.217 – ident: e_1_2_9_60_1 doi: 10.2307/1882010 – ident: e_1_2_9_58_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_17_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01313.x – ident: e_1_2_9_13_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_21_1 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1548766 – ident: e_1_2_9_32_1 doi: 10.1506/4XR4-KT5V-E8CN-91GX – ident: e_1_2_9_33_1 doi: 10.1506/car.25.1.9 – ident: e_1_2_9_63_1 doi: 10.1177/109442819921005 – ident: e_1_2_9_57_1 doi: 10.1002/job.4030110105 – ident: e_1_2_9_28_1 doi: 10.1506/car.26.2.9 – ident: e_1_2_9_46_1 doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2302_3 – volume: 13 start-page: 149 issue: 1 year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_9_40_1 article-title: Does auditing reduce bias in financial reporting? A review of audit‐related adjustment studies publication-title: Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory – ident: e_1_2_9_15_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_8_1 doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.125 – volume-title: Understanding Disclosure Controls and Procedures: Helping CEOs and CFOs respond for the need for better disclosure. A risk management and governance board brief year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_9_53_1 – volume-title: Management’s evaluation of design effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting: Weak regulation and inconsistent compliance year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_9_56_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_22_1 doi: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1141 – ident: e_1_2_9_25_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.004 – volume-title: Amos 4.0 user’s guide year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_9_4_1 |
SSID | ssj0006478 ssib005283826 |
Score | 2.239739 |
Snippet | Public disclosure about effectiveness of internal control systems is subject to much controversy in Canada, resulting in Canadian disclosures being made in... |
SourceID | proquest econis crossref wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 675 |
SubjectTerms | Auditing Canada Control theory Cost-benefit analysis Disclosure Internal control Internal controls Internes Kontrollsystem Investors Kanada Least squares method Management techniques Rechnungsabgrenzung Regression analysis Studies U.S.A |
Title | Direct and Indirect Effects of Internal Control Weaknesses on Accrual Quality: Evidence from a Unique Canadian Regulatory Setting |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-PT8QS0VL-W/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1911-3846.2010.01058.x http://www.econis.eu/PPNSET?PPN=667688919 https://www.proquest.com/docview/921005311 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1015465998 |
Volume | 28 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9tAEB5KKKWXtklaoqYtGyi5yVjvVW_GzZMkNE5c57bsrlahOMjFsiHprf-8M7uSsEMPofRmWMb2rubxzWj2G4DPJdq_TqjonqSRH_PQoM0VkZ8bVC9ylbmigv75RXo8jk9vkpum_4nuwjh-iK7gRpZh_TUZuFT1upHnRMGHAbTp0EKowHuEJ4MoJRr9r6MVJioMoxZJN06arlhagBnSy-ekv97k89cvXotczyld_VEjpKWncb-GT1dRrg1Th69h2m7QdadMe8uF6ulfj7gf_88JvIFXDZplA6d-m_DMVFvwom2m34bfzqMyWRXspHLhkznC5JrNStbUI-_Y0HXMs4mRUxI1uFyxgdbzJa46oo-HL6ydgcroVgyTbGzpZ1lLscBG5pbGkc3mD-zK2I7utzA-PLgeHvvN0AdfY6rKfV7EIVEAFQk6mzgNNJdlWGiVoncxuY6UUWGKKAU3zAtJ9H64fZWqrMQ8IeyX0TvYqGaV2QGGyCQI00zGhAoLw1VQmDILJFHaqSjmHmTtAxW6YUSnwRx3YiUzwhMW9BOCTljYExb3HgSd5E_HCvIEmR2nM50EtRdznge5B_tWi7oVOZ9Sw12WiMnFkfh2zS-v-t_PxMSD3VbNRONrapFj1k6uNPBgr1tFJ0FvfmRlZsua-vho6D2m1rhnq1JP_ttiOBgd0Mf3_yy5Cy9dJZ5qVx9gYzFfmo8I5RbqkzXSP2HLM08 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwEB6hBQEX3mjD8jAS4paqeTvcqrJLF7oVdFu6N8t2HIRapagPaZcb_5wZO4laxGGFuFWypq2deXwzGX8D8KZE-9cJFd2TNPJjHhq0uSLyc4PqRa4yV1TQPxulg2n88SK5qMcB0V0Yxw_RFtzIMqy_JgOngvS-lefEwYcRtG7RQqzAOwgob8aIOygTez_e4aLCQGqxdO2m6ZKlhZghvX5OuvttPn_95r3YdYsS1u9rBLX0PC73EOouzrWB6uQ-LJotuv6UeWe7UR398w_2x_90Bg_gXg1oWc9p4EO4YapHcLvpp38Mv5xTZbIq2GnlIihznMlrtixZXZJcsL5rmmczI-ckanC5Yj2tV1tcdVwfV-9YMwaV0cUYJtnUMtCyhmWBjc03mki2XF2xc2Obup_A9OR40h_49dwHX2O2yn1exCGxABUJ-ps4DTSXZVholaKDMbmOlFFhikAFN8wLSQx_uH2VqqzEVCHsltFTOKiWlTkEhuAkCNNMxgQMC8NVUJgyCySx2qko5h5kzRMVuiZFp9kcC7GTHOEJC_oJQScs7AmLSw-CVvKHIwa5hsyhU5pWgjqMOc-D3IO3Vo3aFbmaU89dlojZ6IP4POFfzrtfh2LmwVGjZ6J2N2uRY-JO3jTw4HW7in6CXv7Iyiy3a2rlo7n3mF3jnq1OXftvi35vfEwfn_2z5Cu4M5icDcXwdPTpCO66wjyVsp7DwWa1NS8Q2W3US2uxvwGwnTdu |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LaxsxEB5KWkIv6Zts04cKpbc13re2N-PGSdrUpE5c5yaklTYEh3XwA5Le-s87I-0udughlN4MYmxLO49vZkffAHws0f6LhIruSRr5MQ8N2pyO_NygepGrzBUV9L8P08Nx_PU8Oa_7n-gujOOHaAtuZBnWX5OBX-ty08hzouDDAFp3aCFU4B3Ekw_jFIEFAaTRGhUVxlELpWsvTXcsLcIM6e1z0t3s8vnrN2-ErkeUr14uENPS47jZAKjrMNfGqcETmDY7dO0p085qqTrFrzvkj__nCJ7CTg1nWc_p3zN4YKrnsN1007-A386lMllpdlS5-MkcY_KCzUpWFySvWN-1zLOJkVMSNbhcsV5RzFe46pg-bj-zZggqo2sxTLKx5Z9lDccCG5kLmkc2m9-yU2Nbul_CeLB_1j_066kPfoG5Kve5jkPiANIJeps4DQouy1AXKkX3YvIiUkaFKcIU3DDXkvj9cPsqVVmJiULYLaNXsFXNKrMLDKFJEKaZjAkWasNVoE2ZBZI47VQUcw-y5oGKoqZEp8kcV2ItNcITFvQTgk5Y2BMWNx4EreS1owW5h8yu05lWgvqLOc-D3INPVovaFTmfUsddlojJ8ECcnPEfp92fx2LiwV6jZqJ2NguRY9pOvjTw4EO7il6CXv3IysxWC2rko6n3mFvjnq1K3ftvi35vtE8fX_-z5HvYPvkyEMdHw2978NhV5amO9Qa2lvOVeYuwbqneWXv9A742Nh0 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct+and+Indirect+Effects+of+Internal+Control+Weaknesses+on+Accrual+Quality%3A+Evidence+from+a+Unique+Canadian+Regulatory+Setting&rft.jtitle=Contemporary+accounting+research&rft.au=Lu%2C+Hai&rft.au=Richardson%2C+Gordon&rft.au=Salterio%2C+Steven&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.pub=Canadian+Academic+Accounting+Association&rft.issn=0823-9150&rft.eissn=1911-3846&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1911-3846.2010.01058.x&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=2583586261 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0823-9150&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0823-9150&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0823-9150&client=summon |