Individual-level cortical morphological network analysis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostic and prognostic insights
Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes...
Saved in:
Published in | Fluids and barriers of the CNS Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 43 - 20 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
06.05.2025
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes.
We enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery.
Both iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores.
The MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes. We enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery. Both iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores. The MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness. Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes. We enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery. Both iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores. The MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness. BackgroundIdiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes.MethodsWe enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery.ResultsBoth iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores.ConclusionsThe MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness. Background Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes. Methods We enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery. Results Both iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores. Conclusions The MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness. Keywords: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, Morphological similarity networks, Morphometric inverse divergence network, Diagnosis, Prediction of shunt efficacy Abstract Background Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes. Methods We enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery. Results Both iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores. Conclusions The MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness. Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes.BACKGROUNDIdiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes.We enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery.METHODSWe enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery.Both iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores.RESULTSBoth iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores.The MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness.CONCLUSIONSThe MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness. |
ArticleNumber | 43 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Li, Shihong Sun, Lianxi Fang, Xuhao Lin, Guangwu Yan, Meijing Liu, Xiao Yang, Yifeng |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yifeng surname: Yang fullname: Yang, Yifeng – sequence: 2 givenname: Meijing surname: Yan fullname: Yan, Meijing – sequence: 3 givenname: Lianxi surname: Sun fullname: Sun, Lianxi – sequence: 4 givenname: Xiao surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Xiao – sequence: 5 givenname: Xuhao surname: Fang fullname: Fang, Xuhao – sequence: 6 givenname: Shihong surname: Li fullname: Li, Shihong – sequence: 7 givenname: Guangwu surname: Lin fullname: Lin, Guangwu |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40329395$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkstu1DAUhiNUREvpC7BAkZAQmxTbsZ2ETVVVXEaqxAbWlmOfJB4ce7CTGc0b8Nh4Ztoyg3AWvn3ni3Lyv8zOnHeQZa8xusa45h8iJk1dFYiwAiHOymLzLLsgiLKiTvdnR-vz7CrGJUqD0gpx8iI7p6gkTdmwi-z3wmmzNnqWtrCwBpsrHyajpM1HH1aDt77f7xxMGx9-5tJJu40m5sblRhu_ktNgVO58GBO1ChDjHCAftjp4BatB2jl-zLWRvfMxiZNAJ8w_bo2Lph-m-Cp73kkb4ephvsx-fP70_e5rcf_ty-Lu9r5QjNZTQTlHDeKAOw0IJG-6RtWY6lpCzTHCrWp5p5sKCKOaKdVSBbVs2o4ogpq6LC-zxcGrvVyKVTCjDFvhpRH7Ax96IXcNsCCYlpiWjaoqAlTLtmW6YozrqkNVyxRLrpuDazW3I2gFbgrSnkhPb5wZRO_XAhPEKkJQMrx_MAT_a4Y4idFEBdZKB36OoiQIY8xpSRL69h906eeQ_saBYrxqCPtL9TJ9gXGdTy9WO6m4rcu64rhCO9f1f6j0aBiNSkHrTDo_KXh3VDCAtNMQvZ0n4108Bd8ct-SpF4-JSwA5ACr4GAN0TwhGYpdscUi2SMkW-2SLTfkHhFLtVw |
Cites_doi | 10.3233/JAD-220877 10.1007/s00701-022-05402-8 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110873 10.1007/s11604-024-01612-5 10.1038/s41583-024-00882-2 10.1007/s00415-014-7454-0 10.1007/s00415-021-10762-9 10.1073/pnas.1820754116 10.3389/fnins.2017.00470 10.1186/s13195-024-01448-1 10.3171/2015.1.JNS141633 10.1038/s41380-022-01896-x 10.1152/jn.00338.2011 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.023 10.3233/JAD-130581 10.2176/nmc.st.2020-0292 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.086 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119387 10.1002/jmri.27499 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.04.003 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.11.010 10.1002/advs.202104538 10.1186/s12987-023-00407-6 10.1038/s41593-023-01376-7 10.1186/s12987-022-00362-8 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.01.006 10.1093/brain/awn146 10.3174/ajnr.A4046 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120493 10.1007/s12264-022-00873-2 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108362 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102862 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 10.1111/ene.16328 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118751 10.1155/2012/718150 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.039 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213349 10.1038/s41467-021-21943-5 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.005 10.1002/hbm.25308 10.1093/cercor/bhad454 10.1016/j.tins.2023.11.011 10.1177/1550059418812156 10.1002/hbm.25230 10.1111/ane.13205 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00356 10.1007/s00406-012-0350-7 10.3390/diagnostics14070704 10.1111/cns.14384 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 10.1111/cns.14178 10.3174/ajnr.A2706 10.1186/s12883-021-02389-0 10.1007/s12264-024-01262-7 10.1007/s00234-022-03021-9 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102195 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2025. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7TK 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12987-025-00653-w |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Neurosciences Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2045-8118 |
EndPage | 20 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_5da1439c772e4dabb5d7556d7f07b5c5 PMC12057220 A838761702 40329395 10_1186_s12987_025_00653_w |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Taiwan |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Taiwan |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality grantid: 23Y11907700 – fundername: Hospital Development Centre grantid: SHDC2022DRT025 – fundername: Shanghai municipal population and family planning commission grantid: 202240257 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 4.4 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADUKV AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION DIK EBD EBLON EBS ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR IHW INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M~E O5R O5S P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP ~8M CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 3V. 7TK 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. M48 PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-4660906e1fde0ea69f9c814d8ae86101bcb6fd97e254d5ccb4ce8a9bf2c209833 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 2045-8118 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:27:19 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:27:35 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 18:19:57 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:29:54 EDT 2025 Fri May 16 01:18:24 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:53:43 EDT 2025 Tue May 13 02:11:23 EDT 2025 Sat May 10 01:40:41 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:59:34 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Morphological similarity networks Diagnosis Morphometric inverse divergence network Prediction of shunt efficacy Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus |
Language | English |
License | 2025. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c548t-4660906e1fde0ea69f9c814d8ae86101bcb6fd97e254d5ccb4ce8a9bf2c209833 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201567925?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 40329395 |
PQID | 3201567925 |
PQPubID | 54868 |
PageCount | 20 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5da1439c772e4dabb5d7556d7f07b5c5 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12057220 proquest_miscellaneous_3201116432 proquest_journals_3201567925 gale_infotracmisc_A838761702 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A838761702 gale_healthsolutions_A838761702 pubmed_primary_40329395 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12987_025_00653_w |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-05-06 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-05-06 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2025 text: 2025-05-06 day: 06 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Fluids and barriers of the CNS |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Fluids Barriers CNS |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | SM Nestor (653_CR2) 2008; 131 T Hattori (653_CR37) 2012; 33 M Rubinov (653_CR34) 2010; 52 S Fabbro (653_CR42) 2023; 20 E Morel (653_CR60) 2024; 31 Y Serulle (653_CR3) 2014; 261 H Li (653_CR25) 2021; 54 J Li (653_CR26) 2021; 12 J Seidlitz (653_CR41) 2018; 97 Z Deng (653_CR6) 2024; 242 SE Morgan (653_CR23) 2019; 116 X Li (653_CR35) 2020; 42 K Zhao (653_CR22) 2022; 9 H Xiao (653_CR49) 2022; 38 DW Moore (653_CR55) 2012; 2012 J Wang (653_CR15) 2024; 47 J Han (653_CR48) 2022; 19 L Sun (653_CR39) 2022; 259 Y Ogata (653_CR38) 2017; 11 GM McKhann (653_CR31) 2011; 7 A Griffa (653_CR12) 2021; 42 S Kanno (653_CR50) 2021; 21 ME Caligiuri (653_CR43) 2022; 269 S Arlt (653_CR53) 2013; 263 T-Y Chen (653_CR20) 2024; 16 HM Khoo (653_CR51) 2016; 124 C Zheng (653_CR21) 2024; 129 A Griffa (653_CR8) 2020; 112 A Di Ieva (653_CR56) 2014; 38 W-Z Dai (653_CR54) 2023; 91 EP Hedges (653_CR32) 2022; 246 I Sebenius (653_CR17) 2025; 26 I Sebenius (653_CR29) 2023; 26 JF Carlsen (653_CR57) 2022; 64 R Martín-Láez (653_CR1) 2015; 84 SG Thavarajasingam (653_CR59) 2023; 165 G Yao (653_CR24) 2024; 285 M Cai (653_CR14) 2023; 29 AI Holodny (653_CR5) 1998; 19 P Galdi (653_CR18) 2020; 25 Y Aoki (653_CR13) 2019; 50 S Fabbro (653_CR11) 2023; 20 BT Thomas Yeo (653_CR36) 2011; 106 M Nakajima (653_CR30) 2021; 61 SG Thavarajasingam (653_CR4) 2023; 165 VC Constantinides (653_CR7) 2020; 141 A Saito (653_CR10) 2020; 47 L-K Yin (653_CR28) 2018; 10 T Imokawa (653_CR45) 2024; 42 W Huang (653_CR44) 2023; 30 A Sarica (653_CR9) 2021; 32 X Wu (653_CR40) 2023; 28 D Hořínek (653_CR46) 2016; 140 J Virhammar (653_CR58) 2014; 35 M Tranfa (653_CR27) 2025; 104 J Niu (653_CR19) 2024; 34 H Colvee-Martin (653_CR47) 2024; 14 P Bugalho (653_CR52) 2014; 118 Q Lin (653_CR16) 2025; 41 R Romero-Garcia (653_CR33) 2012; 59 |
References_xml | – volume: 91 start-page: 1035 year: 2023 ident: 653_CR54 publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis JAD doi: 10.3233/JAD-220877 – volume: 165 start-page: 369 year: 2023 ident: 653_CR59 publication-title: Acta Neurochir (Wien) doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05402-8 – volume: 129 year: 2024 ident: 653_CR21 publication-title: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110873 – volume: 42 start-page: 1215 issue: 11 year: 2024 ident: 653_CR45 publication-title: Jpn J Radiol doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01612-5 – volume: 26 start-page: 42 issue: 1 year: 2025 ident: 653_CR17 publication-title: Nat Rev Neurosci doi: 10.1038/s41583-024-00882-2 – volume: 261 start-page: 1994 year: 2014 ident: 653_CR3 publication-title: J Neurol doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7454-0 – volume: 269 start-page: 1978 year: 2022 ident: 653_CR43 publication-title: J Neurol doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10762-9 – volume: 116 start-page: 9604 year: 2019 ident: 653_CR23 publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820754116 – volume: 11 start-page: 470 year: 2017 ident: 653_CR38 publication-title: Front Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00470 – volume: 16 start-page: 88 year: 2024 ident: 653_CR20 publication-title: Alzheimers Res Ther doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01448-1 – volume: 124 start-page: 350 year: 2016 ident: 653_CR51 publication-title: J Neurosurg doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS141633 – volume: 28 start-page: 1146 year: 2023 ident: 653_CR40 publication-title: Mol Psychiatry doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01896-x – volume: 106 start-page: 1125 year: 2011 ident: 653_CR36 publication-title: J Neurophysiol doi: 10.1152/jn.00338.2011 – volume: 112 start-page: 452 year: 2020 ident: 653_CR8 publication-title: Neurosci Biobehav Rev doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.023 – volume: 38 start-page: 331 year: 2014 ident: 653_CR56 publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis JAD doi: 10.3233/JAD-130581 – volume: 61 start-page: 63 year: 2021 ident: 653_CR30 publication-title: Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2020-0292 – volume: 59 start-page: 3522 year: 2012 ident: 653_CR33 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.086 – volume: 259 year: 2022 ident: 653_CR39 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119387 – volume: 54 start-page: 215 year: 2021 ident: 653_CR25 publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging doi: 10.1002/jmri.27499 – volume: 47 start-page: 312 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 653_CR10 publication-title: J Neuroradiol doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.04.003 – volume: 140 start-page: 52 year: 2016 ident: 653_CR46 publication-title: Clin Neurol Neurosurg doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.11.010 – volume: 9 start-page: 2104538 year: 2022 ident: 653_CR22 publication-title: Adv Sci doi: 10.1002/advs.202104538 – volume: 20 start-page: 7 year: 2023 ident: 653_CR42 publication-title: Fluids Barriers CNS doi: 10.1186/s12987-023-00407-6 – volume: 26 start-page: 1461 year: 2023 ident: 653_CR29 publication-title: Nat Neurosci doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01376-7 – volume: 19 start-page: 66 year: 2022 ident: 653_CR48 publication-title: Fluids Barriers CNS doi: 10.1186/s12987-022-00362-8 – volume: 118 start-page: 83 year: 2014 ident: 653_CR52 publication-title: Clin Neurol Neurosurg doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.01.006 – volume: 131 start-page: 2443 year: 2008 ident: 653_CR2 publication-title: Brain J Neurol doi: 10.1093/brain/awn146 – volume: 35 start-page: 2311 year: 2014 ident: 653_CR58 publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4046 – volume: 285 year: 2024 ident: 653_CR24 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120493 – volume: 38 start-page: 1085 issue: 9 year: 2022 ident: 653_CR49 publication-title: Neurosci Bull doi: 10.1007/s12264-022-00873-2 – volume: 242 year: 2024 ident: 653_CR6 publication-title: Clin Neurol Neurosurg doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108362 – volume: 32 year: 2021 ident: 653_CR9 publication-title: Neuroimage Clin doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102862 – volume: 7 start-page: 263 year: 2011 ident: 653_CR31 publication-title: Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 – volume: 31 year: 2024 ident: 653_CR60 publication-title: Eur J Neurol doi: 10.1111/ene.16328 – volume: 246 year: 2022 ident: 653_CR32 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118751 – volume: 2012 year: 2012 ident: 653_CR55 publication-title: Neurol Res Int doi: 10.1155/2012/718150 – volume: 97 start-page: 231 year: 2018 ident: 653_CR41 publication-title: Neuron doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.039 – volume: 104 issue: 4 year: 2025 ident: 653_CR27 publication-title: Neurology doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213349 – volume: 12 start-page: 1647 year: 2021 ident: 653_CR26 publication-title: Nat Commun doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21943-5 – volume: 84 start-page: 2002 year: 2015 ident: 653_CR1 publication-title: World Neurosurg doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.005 – volume: 42 start-page: 1485 issue: 5 year: 2021 ident: 653_CR12 publication-title: Hum Brain Mapp doi: 10.1002/hbm.25308 – volume: 20 start-page: 7 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 653_CR11 publication-title: Fluids Barriers CNS. doi: 10.1186/s12987-023-00407-6 – volume: 34 start-page: bhad454 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 653_CR19 publication-title: Cereb Cortex doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad454 – volume: 47 start-page: 106 issue: 2 year: 2024 ident: 653_CR15 publication-title: Trends Neurosci doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.11.011 – volume: 165 start-page: 369 issue: 2 year: 2023 ident: 653_CR4 publication-title: Acta Neurochir (Wien) doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05402-8 – volume: 50 start-page: 210 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 653_CR13 publication-title: Clin EEG Neurosci doi: 10.1177/1550059418812156 – volume: 42 start-page: 398 year: 2020 ident: 653_CR35 publication-title: Hum Brain Mapp doi: 10.1002/hbm.25230 – volume: 141 start-page: 328 year: 2020 ident: 653_CR7 publication-title: Acta Neurol Scand doi: 10.1111/ane.13205 – volume: 10 start-page: 356 year: 2018 ident: 653_CR28 publication-title: Front Aging Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00356 – volume: 19 start-page: 813 year: 1998 ident: 653_CR5 publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol – volume: 263 start-page: 335 year: 2013 ident: 653_CR53 publication-title: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci doi: 10.1007/s00406-012-0350-7 – volume: 14 start-page: 704 year: 2024 ident: 653_CR47 publication-title: Diagnostics doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14070704 – volume: 29 start-page: 3713 issue: 12 year: 2023 ident: 653_CR14 publication-title: CNS Neurosci Ther doi: 10.1111/cns.14384 – volume: 52 start-page: 1059 year: 2010 ident: 653_CR34 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 – volume: 30 year: 2023 ident: 653_CR44 publication-title: CNS Neurosci Ther doi: 10.1111/cns.14178 – volume: 33 start-page: 97 year: 2012 ident: 653_CR37 publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2706 – volume: 21 start-page: 353 year: 2021 ident: 653_CR50 publication-title: BMC Neurol doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02389-0 – volume: 41 start-page: 46 issue: 1 year: 2025 ident: 653_CR16 publication-title: Neurosci Bull doi: 10.1007/s12264-024-01262-7 – volume: 64 start-page: 2119 year: 2022 ident: 653_CR57 publication-title: Neuroradiology doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-03021-9 – volume: 25 year: 2020 ident: 653_CR18 publication-title: NeuroImage Clin doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102195 |
SSID | ssj0000447062 |
Score | 2.3626387 |
Snippet | Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in... Background Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly... BackgroundIdiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly... Abstract Background Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 43 |
SubjectTerms | Advertising executives Aged Aged, 80 and over Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging Alzheimer Disease - pathology Alzheimer's disease Atrophy Brain architecture Cerebral Cortex - diagnostic imaging Cerebral Cortex - pathology Cerebrospinal fluid Cognitive ability Diagnosis Female Gait Hospitals Humans Hydrocephalus Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - diagnosis Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - diagnostic imaging Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - pathology Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - surgery Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Middle Aged Morphological similarity networks Morphology Morphometric inverse divergence network Nerve Net - diagnostic imaging Nerve Net - pathology Nervous system diseases Neurodegenerative diseases Pathology Patients Prediction of shunt efficacy Prognosis Support Vector Machine Surgery |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlh9JLafrcNk1VKPRQTGy9LPWWlIa0kJ4ayE3oyRq23hDvEvIP-rM7krxmTQ-9FPayK1nY89A34535hNCHKCTnRMSq9ZxVzFhaSatUFRgNHDCDq0zXdPlDXFyx79f8eu-or1QTVuiBi-BOuDcA6cpBFBiYN9Zy33IufBvr1nKX2UsB8_aSqbwHM9bWguy6ZKQ4GQDYwJ_S6a2Zj7W6myFRJuz_e1vew6V5zeQeCJ0_QY_H6BGflrs-RA9C_xQ9vBz_H3-Gfn-b-quqVSoHwpBc5rfV-NcaJLrb6XBfqr-xGTlJcNfjznfrfECxw32KZFc4F8lubwNe3vsEdDdLs9oOn7Ev9XmwMCzgcarxGr92_ZCy_eE5ujr_-vPLRTWetVA5yFk2FROiVrUITfShDkaoqJxsmJcmSIiwGuusiF61ARJKz52zzAVplI3EgfglpS_QQb_uwyuEpaW8kdHxANmOjwB3lEVuARYjl56IBfq0k7u-KZQaOqciUuiiJQ1a0llL-m6BzpJqppmJDjv_AEaiRyPR_zKSBXqXFKtLb-nk1PpUUkCDpq3JAn3MM5Jbg36dGbsT4JESQdZs5tFsJrijmw_vjEeP28GgKUkd660icCfvp-F0ZSpx68N6W-Y0kLxSWOJlsbXpoVlNISxTcLWcWeFMKvORvltmsvCGQEROSP36f8jxDXpEsgfBRxyhg83tNryFoGxjj7P__QHu7DdW priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Individual-level cortical morphological network analysis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostic and prognostic insights |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40329395 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201567925 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201116432 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12057220 https://doaj.org/article/5da1439c772e4dabb5d7556d7f07b5c5 |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfR3bitQwNOguiC_i3dldxwiCD1K2TZM08UVmdIdV2EXEhXkLzW1nYGzH6QyLf-Bne5J26hZBKJQ2p6HNybn2XBB647lgjHCfFJbRhJY6T4SWMnE0dwxkBpOxXNPFJT-_ol_mbN453JourHLPEyOjtrUJPvLTnISk30IS9mH9Mwldo8Lf1a6Fxl10GEqXhZCuYl70PpaU0iLlZJ8rI_hpA-INqCr0cI1VWZObgTyKZfv_Zc63pNMwcvKWKJo9RA86HRJPWqQ_Qndc9Rjdu-j-kj9Bvz_3WVbJKgQFYTAxo88a_6hhXff8DldtDDguu8okeFnhpV3WsU2xwVXQZ1c4hsruNg4vftkg7taLcrVr3mPbRunBxDCBxSHSq7tcVk2w-Zun6Gp29v3jedJ1XEgMWC7bhHKeypS7zFuXupJLL43IqBWlE6BnZdpo7q0sHJiVlhmjqXGilNoTQ1Ip8vwZOqjqyr1AWOicZcIb5sDmsR6EXk490yAcPROW8BF6t193tW4La6hokAiuWiwpwJKKWFI3IzQNqOkhQ1HseKPeXKuOxhSzJWh_0oDB4KgttWa2YIzbwqeFZoaN0KuAWNVmmPakrSYiB5mQFSkZobcRIhA34NeUXY4CfFIokzWAPBlAAlGa4fB-86iOKTTq7xYeodf9cHgyBLpVrt61MBmYsDlM8bzda_1H0zQH5UzC02KwCwerMhyplotYMjwjoJcTkh79_72O0X0SaQMOfoIOtpudewlK11aPI2WN0eFk-mk6g_P07PLrt3F0YfwBgKUyVA |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELemTQJeEN8UBjMSiAcULXFsx0ZCaINNLVsrhDZpb15iO7RSSUrTqtp_wF_D38jZ-WAREm-T-tL6YjU53_3uLveB0OucC8YIz4PEMBrQNIsDkUkZWBpbBpjBpG_XNJ7w4Tn9csEuttDvthbGpVW2OtEralNqFyPfj4kr-k0kYR8XPwM3Ncq9XW1HaNTH4sRebcBlqz6MPgN_3xByfHT2aRg0UwUCDdb5KqCchzLkNsqNDW3KZS61iKgRqRVgS0SZznhuZGLBdTJM64xqK1KZ5USTUAoXAAWVv0NjcGW20c7h0eTrty6qE1KahJy01TmC71cAqCDHbmqs7wMbbHoI6AcF_AsH1_Cwn6t5DfyO76G7jdWKD-pjdh9t2eIBujVu3ss_RL9GXV1XMHdpSBicWh8lxz9K4GSrYXFRZ53jtOmFgmcFnplZ6Qcja1w4C3qOfXLuemnx9Mo4gF1M0_m6eo9NnRcIG8MGBrvcsubrrKhclKF6hM5vhBuP0XZRFvYpwiKLWSRyzSx4WSYHmI1pzjKA45wJQ_gAvWufu1rUrTyUd4EEVzWXFHBJeS6pzQAdOtZ0lK4Nt_-hXH5XjVQrZlKwN6UGF8VSk2YZMwlj3CR5mGRMswHac4xVdU1rp0zUgYgBhaIkJAP01lM4dQL81WlTFQG35Bpz9Sh3e5SgBnR_uT08qlFDlforNAP0qlt2V7rUusKW65omAqc5hi2e1Getu2kaxmAOSrha9E5h76n0V4rZ1Dcpjwh4AoSEz_7_v_bQ7eHZ-FSdjiYnz9Ed4uUEPnwXba-Wa_sCTL5V9rKRM4wub1q0_wBrR22e |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual-level+cortical+morphological+network+analysis+in+idiopathic+normal+pressure+hydrocephalus%3A+diagnostic+and+prognostic+insights&rft.jtitle=Fluids+and+barriers+of+the+CNS&rft.au=Yang%2C+Yifeng&rft.au=Yan%2C+Meijing&rft.au=Sun%2C+Lianxi&rft.au=Liu%2C+Xiao&rft.date=2025-05-06&rft.issn=2045-8118&rft.eissn=2045-8118&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12987-025-00653-w&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s12987_025_00653_w |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2045-8118&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2045-8118&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2045-8118&client=summon |