Individual-level cortical morphological network analysis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostic and prognostic insights

Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFluids and barriers of the CNS Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 43 - 20
Main Authors Yang, Yifeng, Yan, Meijing, Sun, Lianxi, Liu, Xiao, Fang, Xuhao, Li, Shihong, Lin, Guangwu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 06.05.2025
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes. We enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery. Both iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores. The MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness.
AbstractList Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes. We enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery. Both iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores. The MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness.
Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes. We enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery. Both iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores. The MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness.
BackgroundIdiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes.MethodsWe enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery.ResultsBoth iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores.ConclusionsThe MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness.
Background Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes. Methods We enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery. Results Both iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores. Conclusions The MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness. Keywords: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, Morphological similarity networks, Morphometric inverse divergence network, Diagnosis, Prediction of shunt efficacy
Abstract Background Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes. Methods We enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery. Results Both iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores. Conclusions The MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness.
Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes.BACKGROUNDIdiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in terms of its underlying pathological mechanisms. Cortical morphological similarity network, which quantify synchronized morphological changes across brain regions, offer novel insights into inter-individual neuroanatomical variability. This study investigates individual-level cortical morphological network patterns in iNPH, explores their diagnostic utility and prognostic value for postoperative outcomes.We enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery.METHODSWe enrolled 56 confirmed iNPH patients, 50 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, and 60 healthy controls (HC). Cortical morphological similarity networks were constructed using a morphometric inverse divergence network (MIND) framework, integrating five key cortical features: cortical thickness, mean curvature, sulcal depth, surface area, and cortical volume. Graph theory analysis was employed to quantify global and nodal network properties. Partial correlations with MMSE scores assessed network-cognition relationships. A LASSO-regularized support vector machine (SVM) classifier differentiated iNPH, AD, and HC groups using regional MIND similarity (MINDs) features. Finally, preoperative MRI-derived MINDs were integrated into a LASSO-regularized support vector regression (SVR) model to predict postoperative cognitive and gait improvements following shunt surgery.Both iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores.RESULTSBoth iNPH and AD exhibited disrupted MIND network topology versus HC, including lower clustering coefficient, global efficiency, and local efficiency (all p < 0.05). Distinct spatial patterns emerged: iNPH showed localized lower values in cingulate subregions (degree centrality, node efficiency, MINDs), whereas AD demonstrated widespread alterations in fusiform, insular, and temporoparietal cortices. MMSE-associated MINDs in iNPH localized to frontostriatal circuits, contrasting with diffuse associations in AD. The multimodal classifier combining ventricular enlargement, regional brain volume, and MINDs achieved 87.00% accuracy (macro-AUC = 0.96) in three-group discrimination. Moreover, preoperative MINDs effectively predicted postoperative improvements in cognition and gait, with correlation coefficients of 0.941 and 0.889, respectively, between predicted and actual scores.The MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness.CONCLUSIONSThe MIND-based morphological similarity network reveals coordinated cortical morphological alterations in iNPH and highlights its heterogeneity compared to AD. These findings offer potential biomarkers to differentiate iNPH from AD. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of MIND-based features for postoperative outcomes underscores their utility as non-invasive preoperative tools for evaluating shunt surgery effectiveness.
ArticleNumber 43
Audience Academic
Author Li, Shihong
Sun, Lianxi
Fang, Xuhao
Lin, Guangwu
Yan, Meijing
Liu, Xiao
Yang, Yifeng
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yifeng
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Yifeng
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Meijing
  surname: Yan
  fullname: Yan, Meijing
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Lianxi
  surname: Sun
  fullname: Sun, Lianxi
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Xiao
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Xiao
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Xuhao
  surname: Fang
  fullname: Fang, Xuhao
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Shihong
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Shihong
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Guangwu
  surname: Lin
  fullname: Lin, Guangwu
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40329395$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkstu1DAUhiNUREvpC7BAkZAQmxTbsZ2ETVVVXEaqxAbWlmOfJB4ce7CTGc0b8Nh4Ztoyg3AWvn3ni3Lyv8zOnHeQZa8xusa45h8iJk1dFYiwAiHOymLzLLsgiLKiTvdnR-vz7CrGJUqD0gpx8iI7p6gkTdmwi-z3wmmzNnqWtrCwBpsrHyajpM1HH1aDt77f7xxMGx9-5tJJu40m5sblRhu_ktNgVO58GBO1ChDjHCAftjp4BatB2jl-zLWRvfMxiZNAJ8w_bo2Lph-m-Cp73kkb4ephvsx-fP70_e5rcf_ty-Lu9r5QjNZTQTlHDeKAOw0IJG-6RtWY6lpCzTHCrWp5p5sKCKOaKdVSBbVs2o4ogpq6LC-zxcGrvVyKVTCjDFvhpRH7Ax96IXcNsCCYlpiWjaoqAlTLtmW6YozrqkNVyxRLrpuDazW3I2gFbgrSnkhPb5wZRO_XAhPEKkJQMrx_MAT_a4Y4idFEBdZKB36OoiQIY8xpSRL69h906eeQ_saBYrxqCPtL9TJ9gXGdTy9WO6m4rcu64rhCO9f1f6j0aBiNSkHrTDo_KXh3VDCAtNMQvZ0n4108Bd8ct-SpF4-JSwA5ACr4GAN0TwhGYpdscUi2SMkW-2SLTfkHhFLtVw
Cites_doi 10.3233/JAD-220877
10.1007/s00701-022-05402-8
10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110873
10.1007/s11604-024-01612-5
10.1038/s41583-024-00882-2
10.1007/s00415-014-7454-0
10.1007/s00415-021-10762-9
10.1073/pnas.1820754116
10.3389/fnins.2017.00470
10.1186/s13195-024-01448-1
10.3171/2015.1.JNS141633
10.1038/s41380-022-01896-x
10.1152/jn.00338.2011
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.023
10.3233/JAD-130581
10.2176/nmc.st.2020-0292
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.086
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119387
10.1002/jmri.27499
10.1016/j.neurad.2019.04.003
10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.11.010
10.1002/advs.202104538
10.1186/s12987-023-00407-6
10.1038/s41593-023-01376-7
10.1186/s12987-022-00362-8
10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.01.006
10.1093/brain/awn146
10.3174/ajnr.A4046
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120493
10.1007/s12264-022-00873-2
10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108362
10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102862
10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
10.1111/ene.16328
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118751
10.1155/2012/718150
10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.039
10.1212/WNL.0000000000213349
10.1038/s41467-021-21943-5
10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.005
10.1002/hbm.25308
10.1093/cercor/bhad454
10.1016/j.tins.2023.11.011
10.1177/1550059418812156
10.1002/hbm.25230
10.1111/ane.13205
10.3389/fnagi.2018.00356
10.1007/s00406-012-0350-7
10.3390/diagnostics14070704
10.1111/cns.14384
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003
10.1111/cns.14178
10.3174/ajnr.A2706
10.1186/s12883-021-02389-0
10.1007/s12264-024-01262-7
10.1007/s00234-022-03021-9
10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102195
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2025 2025
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7TK
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12987-025-00653-w
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
Publicly Available Content Database



MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2045-8118
EndPage 20
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_5da1439c772e4dabb5d7556d7f07b5c5
PMC12057220
A838761702
40329395
10_1186_s12987_025_00653_w
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Taiwan
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Taiwan
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
  grantid: 23Y11907700
– fundername: Hospital Development Centre
  grantid: SHDC2022DRT025
– fundername: Shanghai municipal population and family planning commission
  grantid: 202240257
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
4.4
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADUKV
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
DIK
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M~E
O5R
O5S
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
~8M
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7TK
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
M48
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-4660906e1fde0ea69f9c814d8ae86101bcb6fd97e254d5ccb4ce8a9bf2c209833
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 2045-8118
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:27:19 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:27:35 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 18:19:57 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:29:54 EDT 2025
Fri May 16 01:18:24 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:53:43 EDT 2025
Tue May 13 02:11:23 EDT 2025
Sat May 10 01:40:41 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:59:34 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Morphological similarity networks
Diagnosis
Morphometric inverse divergence network
Prediction of shunt efficacy
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
Language English
License 2025. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c548t-4660906e1fde0ea69f9c814d8ae86101bcb6fd97e254d5ccb4ce8a9bf2c209833
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201567925?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 40329395
PQID 3201567925
PQPubID 54868
PageCount 20
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5da1439c772e4dabb5d7556d7f07b5c5
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12057220
proquest_miscellaneous_3201116432
proquest_journals_3201567925
gale_infotracmisc_A838761702
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A838761702
gale_healthsolutions_A838761702
pubmed_primary_40329395
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12987_025_00653_w
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-05-06
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-05-06
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-05-06
  day: 06
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Fluids and barriers of the CNS
PublicationTitleAlternate Fluids Barriers CNS
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References SM Nestor (653_CR2) 2008; 131
T Hattori (653_CR37) 2012; 33
M Rubinov (653_CR34) 2010; 52
S Fabbro (653_CR42) 2023; 20
E Morel (653_CR60) 2024; 31
Y Serulle (653_CR3) 2014; 261
H Li (653_CR25) 2021; 54
J Li (653_CR26) 2021; 12
J Seidlitz (653_CR41) 2018; 97
Z Deng (653_CR6) 2024; 242
SE Morgan (653_CR23) 2019; 116
X Li (653_CR35) 2020; 42
K Zhao (653_CR22) 2022; 9
H Xiao (653_CR49) 2022; 38
DW Moore (653_CR55) 2012; 2012
J Wang (653_CR15) 2024; 47
J Han (653_CR48) 2022; 19
L Sun (653_CR39) 2022; 259
Y Ogata (653_CR38) 2017; 11
GM McKhann (653_CR31) 2011; 7
A Griffa (653_CR12) 2021; 42
S Kanno (653_CR50) 2021; 21
ME Caligiuri (653_CR43) 2022; 269
S Arlt (653_CR53) 2013; 263
T-Y Chen (653_CR20) 2024; 16
HM Khoo (653_CR51) 2016; 124
C Zheng (653_CR21) 2024; 129
A Griffa (653_CR8) 2020; 112
A Di Ieva (653_CR56) 2014; 38
W-Z Dai (653_CR54) 2023; 91
EP Hedges (653_CR32) 2022; 246
I Sebenius (653_CR17) 2025; 26
I Sebenius (653_CR29) 2023; 26
JF Carlsen (653_CR57) 2022; 64
R Martín-Láez (653_CR1) 2015; 84
SG Thavarajasingam (653_CR59) 2023; 165
G Yao (653_CR24) 2024; 285
M Cai (653_CR14) 2023; 29
AI Holodny (653_CR5) 1998; 19
P Galdi (653_CR18) 2020; 25
Y Aoki (653_CR13) 2019; 50
S Fabbro (653_CR11) 2023; 20
BT Thomas Yeo (653_CR36) 2011; 106
M Nakajima (653_CR30) 2021; 61
SG Thavarajasingam (653_CR4) 2023; 165
VC Constantinides (653_CR7) 2020; 141
A Saito (653_CR10) 2020; 47
L-K Yin (653_CR28) 2018; 10
T Imokawa (653_CR45) 2024; 42
W Huang (653_CR44) 2023; 30
A Sarica (653_CR9) 2021; 32
X Wu (653_CR40) 2023; 28
D Hořínek (653_CR46) 2016; 140
J Virhammar (653_CR58) 2014; 35
M Tranfa (653_CR27) 2025; 104
J Niu (653_CR19) 2024; 34
H Colvee-Martin (653_CR47) 2024; 14
P Bugalho (653_CR52) 2014; 118
Q Lin (653_CR16) 2025; 41
R Romero-Garcia (653_CR33) 2012; 59
References_xml – volume: 91
  start-page: 1035
  year: 2023
  ident: 653_CR54
  publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis JAD
  doi: 10.3233/JAD-220877
– volume: 165
  start-page: 369
  year: 2023
  ident: 653_CR59
  publication-title: Acta Neurochir (Wien)
  doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05402-8
– volume: 129
  year: 2024
  ident: 653_CR21
  publication-title: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110873
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1215
  issue: 11
  year: 2024
  ident: 653_CR45
  publication-title: Jpn J Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01612-5
– volume: 26
  start-page: 42
  issue: 1
  year: 2025
  ident: 653_CR17
  publication-title: Nat Rev Neurosci
  doi: 10.1038/s41583-024-00882-2
– volume: 261
  start-page: 1994
  year: 2014
  ident: 653_CR3
  publication-title: J Neurol
  doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7454-0
– volume: 269
  start-page: 1978
  year: 2022
  ident: 653_CR43
  publication-title: J Neurol
  doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10762-9
– volume: 116
  start-page: 9604
  year: 2019
  ident: 653_CR23
  publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820754116
– volume: 11
  start-page: 470
  year: 2017
  ident: 653_CR38
  publication-title: Front Neurosci
  doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00470
– volume: 16
  start-page: 88
  year: 2024
  ident: 653_CR20
  publication-title: Alzheimers Res Ther
  doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01448-1
– volume: 124
  start-page: 350
  year: 2016
  ident: 653_CR51
  publication-title: J Neurosurg
  doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS141633
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1146
  year: 2023
  ident: 653_CR40
  publication-title: Mol Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01896-x
– volume: 106
  start-page: 1125
  year: 2011
  ident: 653_CR36
  publication-title: J Neurophysiol
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00338.2011
– volume: 112
  start-page: 452
  year: 2020
  ident: 653_CR8
  publication-title: Neurosci Biobehav Rev
  doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.023
– volume: 38
  start-page: 331
  year: 2014
  ident: 653_CR56
  publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis JAD
  doi: 10.3233/JAD-130581
– volume: 61
  start-page: 63
  year: 2021
  ident: 653_CR30
  publication-title: Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)
  doi: 10.2176/nmc.st.2020-0292
– volume: 59
  start-page: 3522
  year: 2012
  ident: 653_CR33
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.086
– volume: 259
  year: 2022
  ident: 653_CR39
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119387
– volume: 54
  start-page: 215
  year: 2021
  ident: 653_CR25
  publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.27499
– volume: 47
  start-page: 312
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  ident: 653_CR10
  publication-title: J Neuroradiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.04.003
– volume: 140
  start-page: 52
  year: 2016
  ident: 653_CR46
  publication-title: Clin Neurol Neurosurg
  doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.11.010
– volume: 9
  start-page: 2104538
  year: 2022
  ident: 653_CR22
  publication-title: Adv Sci
  doi: 10.1002/advs.202104538
– volume: 20
  start-page: 7
  year: 2023
  ident: 653_CR42
  publication-title: Fluids Barriers CNS
  doi: 10.1186/s12987-023-00407-6
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1461
  year: 2023
  ident: 653_CR29
  publication-title: Nat Neurosci
  doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01376-7
– volume: 19
  start-page: 66
  year: 2022
  ident: 653_CR48
  publication-title: Fluids Barriers CNS
  doi: 10.1186/s12987-022-00362-8
– volume: 118
  start-page: 83
  year: 2014
  ident: 653_CR52
  publication-title: Clin Neurol Neurosurg
  doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.01.006
– volume: 131
  start-page: 2443
  year: 2008
  ident: 653_CR2
  publication-title: Brain J Neurol
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awn146
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2311
  year: 2014
  ident: 653_CR58
  publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4046
– volume: 285
  year: 2024
  ident: 653_CR24
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120493
– volume: 38
  start-page: 1085
  issue: 9
  year: 2022
  ident: 653_CR49
  publication-title: Neurosci Bull
  doi: 10.1007/s12264-022-00873-2
– volume: 242
  year: 2024
  ident: 653_CR6
  publication-title: Clin Neurol Neurosurg
  doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108362
– volume: 32
  year: 2021
  ident: 653_CR9
  publication-title: Neuroimage Clin
  doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102862
– volume: 7
  start-page: 263
  year: 2011
  ident: 653_CR31
  publication-title: Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc
  doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
– volume: 31
  year: 2024
  ident: 653_CR60
  publication-title: Eur J Neurol
  doi: 10.1111/ene.16328
– volume: 246
  year: 2022
  ident: 653_CR32
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118751
– volume: 2012
  year: 2012
  ident: 653_CR55
  publication-title: Neurol Res Int
  doi: 10.1155/2012/718150
– volume: 97
  start-page: 231
  year: 2018
  ident: 653_CR41
  publication-title: Neuron
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.039
– volume: 104
  issue: 4
  year: 2025
  ident: 653_CR27
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213349
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1647
  year: 2021
  ident: 653_CR26
  publication-title: Nat Commun
  doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21943-5
– volume: 84
  start-page: 2002
  year: 2015
  ident: 653_CR1
  publication-title: World Neurosurg
  doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.005
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1485
  issue: 5
  year: 2021
  ident: 653_CR12
  publication-title: Hum Brain Mapp
  doi: 10.1002/hbm.25308
– volume: 20
  start-page: 7
  issue: 1
  year: 2023
  ident: 653_CR11
  publication-title: Fluids Barriers CNS.
  doi: 10.1186/s12987-023-00407-6
– volume: 34
  start-page: bhad454
  issue: 1
  year: 2024
  ident: 653_CR19
  publication-title: Cereb Cortex
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad454
– volume: 47
  start-page: 106
  issue: 2
  year: 2024
  ident: 653_CR15
  publication-title: Trends Neurosci
  doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.11.011
– volume: 165
  start-page: 369
  issue: 2
  year: 2023
  ident: 653_CR4
  publication-title: Acta Neurochir (Wien)
  doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05402-8
– volume: 50
  start-page: 210
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  ident: 653_CR13
  publication-title: Clin EEG Neurosci
  doi: 10.1177/1550059418812156
– volume: 42
  start-page: 398
  year: 2020
  ident: 653_CR35
  publication-title: Hum Brain Mapp
  doi: 10.1002/hbm.25230
– volume: 141
  start-page: 328
  year: 2020
  ident: 653_CR7
  publication-title: Acta Neurol Scand
  doi: 10.1111/ane.13205
– volume: 10
  start-page: 356
  year: 2018
  ident: 653_CR28
  publication-title: Front Aging Neurosci
  doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00356
– volume: 19
  start-page: 813
  year: 1998
  ident: 653_CR5
  publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
– volume: 263
  start-page: 335
  year: 2013
  ident: 653_CR53
  publication-title: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
  doi: 10.1007/s00406-012-0350-7
– volume: 14
  start-page: 704
  year: 2024
  ident: 653_CR47
  publication-title: Diagnostics
  doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14070704
– volume: 29
  start-page: 3713
  issue: 12
  year: 2023
  ident: 653_CR14
  publication-title: CNS Neurosci Ther
  doi: 10.1111/cns.14384
– volume: 52
  start-page: 1059
  year: 2010
  ident: 653_CR34
  publication-title: Neuroimage
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003
– volume: 30
  year: 2023
  ident: 653_CR44
  publication-title: CNS Neurosci Ther
  doi: 10.1111/cns.14178
– volume: 33
  start-page: 97
  year: 2012
  ident: 653_CR37
  publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2706
– volume: 21
  start-page: 353
  year: 2021
  ident: 653_CR50
  publication-title: BMC Neurol
  doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02389-0
– volume: 41
  start-page: 46
  issue: 1
  year: 2025
  ident: 653_CR16
  publication-title: Neurosci Bull
  doi: 10.1007/s12264-024-01262-7
– volume: 64
  start-page: 2119
  year: 2022
  ident: 653_CR57
  publication-title: Neuroradiology
  doi: 10.1007/s00234-022-03021-9
– volume: 25
  year: 2020
  ident: 653_CR18
  publication-title: NeuroImage Clin
  doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102195
SSID ssj0000447062
Score 2.3626387
Snippet Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly understood in...
Background Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly...
BackgroundIdiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains poorly...
Abstract Background Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by treatable cognitive impairment, remains...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 43
SubjectTerms Advertising executives
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging
Alzheimer Disease - pathology
Alzheimer's disease
Atrophy
Brain architecture
Cerebral Cortex - diagnostic imaging
Cerebral Cortex - pathology
Cerebrospinal fluid
Cognitive ability
Diagnosis
Female
Gait
Hospitals
Humans
Hydrocephalus
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - diagnosis
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - diagnostic imaging
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - pathology
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - surgery
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Morphological similarity networks
Morphology
Morphometric inverse divergence network
Nerve Net - diagnostic imaging
Nerve Net - pathology
Nervous system diseases
Neurodegenerative diseases
Pathology
Patients
Prediction of shunt efficacy
Prognosis
Support Vector Machine
Surgery
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlh9JLafrcNk1VKPRQTGy9LPWWlIa0kJ4ayE3oyRq23hDvEvIP-rM7krxmTQ-9FPayK1nY89A34535hNCHKCTnRMSq9ZxVzFhaSatUFRgNHDCDq0zXdPlDXFyx79f8eu-or1QTVuiBi-BOuDcA6cpBFBiYN9Zy33IufBvr1nKX2UsB8_aSqbwHM9bWguy6ZKQ4GQDYwJ_S6a2Zj7W6myFRJuz_e1vew6V5zeQeCJ0_QY_H6BGflrs-RA9C_xQ9vBz_H3-Gfn-b-quqVSoHwpBc5rfV-NcaJLrb6XBfqr-xGTlJcNfjznfrfECxw32KZFc4F8lubwNe3vsEdDdLs9oOn7Ev9XmwMCzgcarxGr92_ZCy_eE5ujr_-vPLRTWetVA5yFk2FROiVrUITfShDkaoqJxsmJcmSIiwGuusiF61ARJKz52zzAVplI3EgfglpS_QQb_uwyuEpaW8kdHxANmOjwB3lEVuARYjl56IBfq0k7u-KZQaOqciUuiiJQ1a0llL-m6BzpJqppmJDjv_AEaiRyPR_zKSBXqXFKtLb-nk1PpUUkCDpq3JAn3MM5Jbg36dGbsT4JESQdZs5tFsJrijmw_vjEeP28GgKUkd660icCfvp-F0ZSpx68N6W-Y0kLxSWOJlsbXpoVlNISxTcLWcWeFMKvORvltmsvCGQEROSP36f8jxDXpEsgfBRxyhg83tNryFoGxjj7P__QHu7DdW
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Individual-level cortical morphological network analysis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostic and prognostic insights
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40329395
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201567925
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201116432
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12057220
https://doaj.org/article/5da1439c772e4dabb5d7556d7f07b5c5
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfR3bitQwNOguiC_i3dldxwiCD1K2TZM08UVmdIdV2EXEhXkLzW1nYGzH6QyLf-Bne5J26hZBKJQ2p6HNybn2XBB647lgjHCfFJbRhJY6T4SWMnE0dwxkBpOxXNPFJT-_ol_mbN453JourHLPEyOjtrUJPvLTnISk30IS9mH9Mwldo8Lf1a6Fxl10GEqXhZCuYl70PpaU0iLlZJ8rI_hpA-INqCr0cI1VWZObgTyKZfv_Zc63pNMwcvKWKJo9RA86HRJPWqQ_Qndc9Rjdu-j-kj9Bvz_3WVbJKgQFYTAxo88a_6hhXff8DldtDDguu8okeFnhpV3WsU2xwVXQZ1c4hsruNg4vftkg7taLcrVr3mPbRunBxDCBxSHSq7tcVk2w-Zun6Gp29v3jedJ1XEgMWC7bhHKeypS7zFuXupJLL43IqBWlE6BnZdpo7q0sHJiVlhmjqXGilNoTQ1Ip8vwZOqjqyr1AWOicZcIb5sDmsR6EXk490yAcPROW8BF6t193tW4La6hokAiuWiwpwJKKWFI3IzQNqOkhQ1HseKPeXKuOxhSzJWh_0oDB4KgttWa2YIzbwqeFZoaN0KuAWNVmmPakrSYiB5mQFSkZobcRIhA34NeUXY4CfFIokzWAPBlAAlGa4fB-86iOKTTq7xYeodf9cHgyBLpVrt61MBmYsDlM8bzda_1H0zQH5UzC02KwCwerMhyplotYMjwjoJcTkh79_72O0X0SaQMOfoIOtpudewlK11aPI2WN0eFk-mk6g_P07PLrt3F0YfwBgKUyVA
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELemTQJeEN8UBjMSiAcULXFsx0ZCaINNLVsrhDZpb15iO7RSSUrTqtp_wF_D38jZ-WAREm-T-tL6YjU53_3uLveB0OucC8YIz4PEMBrQNIsDkUkZWBpbBpjBpG_XNJ7w4Tn9csEuttDvthbGpVW2OtEralNqFyPfj4kr-k0kYR8XPwM3Ncq9XW1HaNTH4sRebcBlqz6MPgN_3xByfHT2aRg0UwUCDdb5KqCchzLkNsqNDW3KZS61iKgRqRVgS0SZznhuZGLBdTJM64xqK1KZ5USTUAoXAAWVv0NjcGW20c7h0eTrty6qE1KahJy01TmC71cAqCDHbmqs7wMbbHoI6AcF_AsH1_Cwn6t5DfyO76G7jdWKD-pjdh9t2eIBujVu3ss_RL9GXV1XMHdpSBicWh8lxz9K4GSrYXFRZ53jtOmFgmcFnplZ6Qcja1w4C3qOfXLuemnx9Mo4gF1M0_m6eo9NnRcIG8MGBrvcsubrrKhclKF6hM5vhBuP0XZRFvYpwiKLWSRyzSx4WSYHmI1pzjKA45wJQ_gAvWufu1rUrTyUd4EEVzWXFHBJeS6pzQAdOtZ0lK4Nt_-hXH5XjVQrZlKwN6UGF8VSk2YZMwlj3CR5mGRMswHac4xVdU1rp0zUgYgBhaIkJAP01lM4dQL81WlTFQG35Bpz9Sh3e5SgBnR_uT08qlFDlforNAP0qlt2V7rUusKW65omAqc5hi2e1Getu2kaxmAOSrha9E5h76n0V4rZ1Dcpjwh4AoSEz_7_v_bQ7eHZ-FSdjiYnz9Ed4uUEPnwXba-Wa_sCTL5V9rKRM4wub1q0_wBrR22e
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual-level+cortical+morphological+network+analysis+in+idiopathic+normal+pressure+hydrocephalus%3A+diagnostic+and+prognostic+insights&rft.jtitle=Fluids+and+barriers+of+the+CNS&rft.au=Yang%2C+Yifeng&rft.au=Yan%2C+Meijing&rft.au=Sun%2C+Lianxi&rft.au=Liu%2C+Xiao&rft.date=2025-05-06&rft.issn=2045-8118&rft.eissn=2045-8118&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12987-025-00653-w&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s12987_025_00653_w
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2045-8118&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2045-8118&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2045-8118&client=summon