Consumer-priced wearable sensors combined with deep learning can be used to accurately predict ground reaction forces during various treadmill running conditions

Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPeerJ (San Francisco, CA) Vol. 12; p. e17896
Main Authors Carter, Josh, Chen, Xi, Cazzola, Dario, Trewartha, Grant, Preatoni, Ezio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States PeerJ. Ltd 29.08.2024
PeerJ Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical $(GRF_v)$ and anteroposterior $(GRF_{ap})$ force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean $(GRF_v)$ rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the $(GRF_{ap})$ estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods.
AbstractList Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $(GRF_v)$\end{document} ( G R F v ) and anteroposterior \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $(GRF_{ap})$\end{document} ( G R F a p ) force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $(GRF_v)$\end{document} ( G R F v ) rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $(GRF_{ap})$\end{document} ( G R F a p ) estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods.
Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical (GRFv) and anteroposterior (GRFap) force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean (GRFv) rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the (GRFap) estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods.
Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical and anteroposterior force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods.
Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical ( G R F v ) and anteroposterior ( G R F a p ) force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean ( G R F v ) rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the ( G R F a p ) estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods.Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical ( G R F v ) and anteroposterior ( G R F a p ) force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean ( G R F v ) rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the ( G R F a p ) estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods.
Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical $(GRF_v)$ and anteroposterior $(GRF_{ap})$ force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean $(GRF_v)$ rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the $(GRF_{ap})$ estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods.
Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical $(GRF_v)$(GRFv) and anteroposterior $(GRF_{ap})$(GRFap) force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean $(GRF_v)$(GRFv) rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the $(GRF_{ap})$(GRFap) estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods.
ArticleNumber e17896
Audience Academic
Author Cazzola, Dario
Chen, Xi
Preatoni, Ezio
Carter, Josh
Trewartha, Grant
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Josh
  surname: Carter
  fullname: Carter, Josh
  organization: Department of Health, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Xi
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Xi
  organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Dario
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7877-6755
  surname: Cazzola
  fullname: Cazzola, Dario
  organization: Department of Health, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Grant
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9021-8956
  surname: Trewartha
  fullname: Trewartha, Grant
  organization: School of Health and Life Sciences, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ezio
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5383-7072
  surname: Preatoni
  fullname: Preatoni, Ezio
  organization: Department of Health, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39221284$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkktr3DAQgE1JadI0p96LoFAKZbfWw7Z0KmHpIxDopT0LWRrtapGlrWSn5Of0n1beTcpuiX2wmPnmYzSel9VZiAGq6jWul12Hu487gLRd4o6L9ll1QXDbLThtxNnR-by6ynlbl4eTtub0RXVOBSGYcHZR_VnFkKcB0mKXnAaDfoNKqveAMoQcU0Y6Dr0Lc8aNG2QAdsgXJriwRloF1AOackmPESmtp6RG8Pdol8A4PaJ1ilMwKIHSo4sB2Zg0ZGSmNNffqeTilNFY8mZw3qM0hYM5BuPmivyqem6Vz3D18L2sfn75_GP1bXH7_evN6vp2oRvWjgthm9b2xHakZgYzU3dW1KIDZakVHdYlKhQnlOneFJQIpssUoObY0toITC-rm4PXRLWVZRqDSvcyKif3gZjWUqXRaQ8StFENa7qiZ0zRvqcgLGG1ZaL00NLi-nRw7aZ-AKMhjEn5E-lpJriNXMc7iTFtW0Jnw_sHQ4q_JsijHFzW4L0KUCYmaS0EbzjvmoK-PaBrVXpzwcai1DMurzmmjAjCRaGWT1DlNTC4Mm2wrsRPCt4dFWxA-XGTo5_2P-UUfHN82X-3fFyyAuADoFPMOYGV2o1q9pQWnJe4lvMuy_0uy_0ul5oP_9U8ap-i_wIF-vjM
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1113_EP092240
crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2025_1507162
crossref_primary_10_1097_BPO_0000000000002950
Cites_doi 10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980
10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762
10.3389/fnbot.2022.913052
10.3390/s19235227
10.3390/s22093338
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.047
10.1101/2021.03.17.435901
10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
10.3390/s23073428
10.1109/TBME.2020.3006158
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.03.002
10.1115/1.4055238
10.3390/s19071483
10.1007/s40279-019-01110-z
10.1080/02640419608727717
10.1016/j.humov.2020.102690
10.3390/s18082564
10.1109/JSEN.2021.3119658
10.3390/s21227709
10.1371/journal.pone.0210000
10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2916476
10.3389/fbioe.2020.00604
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 Carter et al.
COPYRIGHT 2024 PeerJ. Ltd.
2024 Carter et al. 2024 Carter et al.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 Carter et al.
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 PeerJ. Ltd.
– notice: 2024 Carter et al. 2024 Carter et al.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.7717/peerj.17896
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Open Access Full Text
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2167-8359
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_ecda545797e44a3bb3e9f240f496fb63
PMC11366233
A813429289
39221284
10_7717_peerj_17896
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Nurvv Ltd
– fundername: University of Bath
GroupedDBID 53G
5VS
88I
8FE
8FH
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABUWG
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
AZQEC
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BHPHI
BPHCQ
CCPQU
CITATION
DIK
DWQXO
ECGQY
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HYE
IAO
IEA
IHR
IHW
ITC
KQ8
LK8
M2P
M48
M7P
M~E
OK1
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
RPM
W2D
YAO
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
H13
NPM
PQGLB
PMFND
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-9f56fb2f7204d14d07f9097eaf3f971c04d9a8234cbdf56294c392e081f30d913
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2167-8359
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:18:59 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:31:52 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 15:52:46 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:02:32 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:00:46 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:24:27 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:58:47 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:23:23 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:41 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Biomechanics
IMU
LSTM
Training load
Machine learning
Human locomotion
Distance running
Biofeedback
Pressure insole
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2024 Carter et al.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c546t-9f56fb2f7204d14d07f9097eaf3f971c04d9a8234cbdf56294c392e081f30d913
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-7877-6755
0000-0002-9021-8956
0000-0001-5383-7072
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.7717/peerj.17896
PMID 39221284
PQID 3099858875
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ecda545797e44a3bb3e9f240f496fb63
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11366233
proquest_miscellaneous_3099858875
gale_infotracmisc_A813429289
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A813429289
gale_healthsolutions_A813429289
pubmed_primary_39221284
crossref_citationtrail_10_7717_peerj_17896
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_17896
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-08-29
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-08-29
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-08-29
  day: 29
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: San Diego, USA
PublicationTitle PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)
PublicationTitleAlternate PeerJ
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher PeerJ. Ltd
PeerJ Inc
Publisher_xml – name: PeerJ. Ltd
– name: PeerJ Inc
References Matijevich (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-18) 2019; 14
Johnson (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-14) 2021; 68
Alcantara (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-1) 2021; 10
Benson (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-3) 2018; 63
Paszke (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-21) 2019; 32
Vaswani (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-23) 2017; 30
Honert (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-12) 2022; 22
Eguchi (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-8) 2019; 27
Dorschky (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-7) 2020; 8
Cerfoglio (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-5) 2021; 21
Hutabarat (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-13) 2021; 21
Giandolini (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-9) 2014; 47
Jones (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-15) 1996; 14
Ancillao (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-2) 2018; 18
Kim (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-16) 2023; 23
Gurchiek (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-10) 2019; 19
Kingma (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-17) 2014
Benson (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-4) 2019; 19
Hochreiter (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-11) 1997; 9
Ceyssens (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-6) 2019; 49
Matijevich (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-19) 2020; 74
Molnar (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-20) 2020
Taneja (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-22) 2022; 144
Xiang (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-24) 2022; 16
References_xml – year: 2014
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-17
  article-title: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization
  publication-title: ArXiv preprint
  doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-23
  article-title: Attention is all you need
  publication-title: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762
– volume: 16
  start-page: e0203839
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-24
  article-title: Recent machine learning progress in lower limb running biomechanics with wearable technology: a systematic review
  publication-title: Frontiers in Neurorobotics
  doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.913052
– volume: 19
  start-page: 5227
  issue: 23
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-10
  article-title: Estimating biomechanical time-series with wearable sensors: a systematic review of machine learning techniques
  publication-title: Sensors
  doi: 10.3390/s19235227
– volume: 22
  start-page: 3338
  issue: 9
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-12
  article-title: Estimating running ground reaction forces from plantar pressure during graded running
  publication-title: Sensors
  doi: 10.3390/s22093338
– volume: 63
  start-page: 124
  issue: 2
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-3
  article-title: The use of wearable devices for walking and running gait analysis outside of the lab: a systematic review
  publication-title: Gait & Posture
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.047
– volume: 10
  start-page: e12752
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-1
  article-title: Predicting continuous ground reaction forces from accelerometers during uphill and downhill running: a recurrent neural network solution
  publication-title: PeerJ
  doi: 10.1101/2021.03.17.435901
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1735
  issue: 8
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-11
  article-title: Long short-term memory
  publication-title: Neural Computation
  doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
– volume: 23
  issue: 7
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-16
  article-title: A deep learning model for 3d ground reaction force estimation using shoes with three uniaxial load cells
  publication-title: Sensors
  doi: 10.3390/s23073428
– volume: 68
  start-page: 289
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-14
  article-title: Multidimensional ground reaction forces and moments from wearable sensor accelerations via deep learning
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.3006158
– volume: 47
  start-page: 1588
  issue: 7
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-9
  article-title: A simple field method to identify foot strike pattern during running
  publication-title: Journal of Biomechanics
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.03.002
– volume: 144
  start-page: 121006
  issue: 12
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-22
  article-title: A feature-encoded physics-informed parameter identification neural network for musculoskeletal systems
  publication-title: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
  doi: 10.1115/1.4055238
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1483
  issue: 7
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-4
  article-title: Automated accelerometer-based gait event detection during multiple running conditions
  publication-title: Sensors
  doi: 10.3390/s19071483
– volume: 49
  start-page: 1095
  issue: 7
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-6
  article-title: Biomechanical risk factors associated with running-related injuries: a systematic review
  publication-title: Sports Medicine
  doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01110-z
– volume: 32
  start-page: 8026
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-21
  article-title: Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library
  publication-title: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
– volume: 14
  start-page: 321
  issue: 4
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-15
  article-title: A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running
  publication-title: Journal of Sports Sciences
  doi: 10.1080/02640419608727717
– volume: 74
  start-page: 102690
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-19
  article-title: Combining wearable sensor signals, machine learning and biomechanics to estimate tibial bone force and damage during running
  publication-title: Human Movement Science
  doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102690
– volume-title: Interpretable machine learning: a guide for making black box models explainable
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-20
– volume: 18
  start-page: 2564
  issue: 8
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-2
  article-title: Indirect measurement of ground reaction forces and moments by means of wearable inertial sensors: a systematic review
  publication-title: Sensors (Basel)
  doi: 10.3390/s18082564
– volume: 21
  start-page: 26470
  issue: 23
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-13
  article-title: Recent advances in quantitative gait analysis using wearable sensors: a review
  publication-title: IEEE Sensors Journal
  doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3119658
– volume: 21
  start-page: 7709
  issue: 22
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-5
  article-title: Machine learning-based estimation of ground reaction forces and knee joint kinetics from inertial sensors while performing a vertical drop jump
  publication-title: Sensors
  doi: 10.3390/s21227709
– volume: 14
  start-page: e0210000
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-18
  article-title: Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: implications for science, sport and wearable tech
  publication-title: PLOS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210000
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1217
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-8
  article-title: Insole-based estimation of vertical ground reaction force using one-step learning with probabilistic regression and data augmentation
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2916476
– volume: 8
  start-page: 78
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-7
  article-title: CNN-based estimation of sagittal plane walking and running biomechanics from measured and simulated inertial sensor data
  publication-title: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00604
SSID ssj0000826083
Score 2.3638182
Snippet Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage e17896
SubjectTerms Adult
Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology
Biomechanics
Computational Science
Consumer behavior
Data Mining and Machine Learning
Deep Learning
Distance running
Exercise Test - instrumentation
Exercise Test - methods
Female
Humans
IMU
Kinesiology
LSTM
Machine learning
Male
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Neural networks
Pressure insole
Running
Running - physiology
Sensors
Somatotropin releasing hormone
Sports Injury
Wearable Electronic Devices
Young Adult
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Ni9YwEA6yB_EifltdNcKCIJRtm7RJjuvisgh6cmFvIZ_uwtKWvq3iz_GfOpN2X1oUvHhthrbJTDLPtDPPEHIkghe18AK2uDU5dyzm0vIqN42yUvoiOp8SZL805xf802V9uWr1hTlhMz3wvHDHwXkDXl4oETg3zFoWVAQ3FLlqom0Szyf4vFUwlc5gQM0ALuaCPAEhy3EfwoDpOxLp-VcuKDH1_3kerxzSNlly5X3OHpD7C2ykJ_PrPiR3QvuI3P28_Bh_TH6dLqWUeY8sQZ7-AAvGqii6gzi1G3YULAuCYBy5Hq-oD6GnS8eIbxSWl9pApx0Mjx01zk3IIHHzk_YDPmKkWPzRegoIM9VBUIC6cMDQuciRfoeAu5t2FLPWPfYxosPUznfu8Jc4mvYTcnH28evpeb50X8hdzZsxV7GGBa4idrHxJfeFiKoALZjIohKlg6vKyIpxZz2IVgoUraoAECOywquSPSUHbdeG54Qy662vG1CdAwDUcCNBmaU1MTrRFK7KyPtbhWi3UJNjh4wbDSEKak8n7emkvYwc7YX7mZHj72IfULN7EaTRThfAuPRiXPpfxpWRN2gXeq5J3R8G-kSWDPt8SZWRd0kCjwN4ZWeWqgaYOBJrbSQPN5Kwjd1m-O2t7Wkcwty3NoDuNAMQL2twBnVGns22uJ8VrHiFCCMjcmOlm2lvR9rrq8Qijs18APuyF_9joV6SexWgPfzYXqlDcjAOU3gFaG20r9PG_A0gnUS_
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Consumer-priced wearable sensors combined with deep learning can be used to accurately predict ground reaction forces during various treadmill running conditions
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39221284
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3099858875
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11366233
https://doaj.org/article/ecda545797e44a3bb3e9f240f496fb63
Volume 12
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9RAEF9qC-KL-N1oPVcoCEJqkt1ks0_SltYitIh4cG8h-9UWjiQmObV_jv-pM5vc0Wjx5R6yk9zOzszub5L5IGRfWCNSYQSYuCpDrpkLc8WTsMykynMTOW18gOxFdjbnnxfpYousm3GOC9jd6dphP6l5uzz49f3mIxg84NcDAd7Ih8baFiNzcpndIztwJAlsZXA-4ny_JQOIjnxJzgTrfAPqkEOu3t_3T04nX8T_36361lk1jaO8dTCdPiIPR0RJDwcVeEy2bPWE3D8fv5k_Jb-PxyzLsMECQob-BOXGhCnagQtbtx0FpQP_GEeu-ytqrG3o2EziksLKU2XpqoPhvqal1issLrG8oU2Lf9FTzAupDAXw6VMkKKBg2HvokP9If4AvXq86igHtBlsc0XZVDU-u8Ws5av0zMj89-XZ8Fo6NGUKd8qwPpUszpxKHDW5MzE0knIyksKVjTopYw1VZ5gnjWhkgTSTogEwsoA_HIiNj9pxsV3VldwllyiiTZopZDdgo42UuLI9V6ZwWWaSTgLxfC6TQY9VybJ6xLMB7QekVXnqFl15A9jfEzVCs426yI5TshgQrbPsLdXtZjAZbWG1KQJcC2OK8ZApmKB3AH8cl8J6xgLxBvSiGdNXNPlEc5jHDFmC5DMg7T4G6C1PW5ZjwAIxjza0J5d6EEixcT4bfrnWvwCEMi6ssyK5ggO_zFM6JNCAvBl3ccAUrniD4CEg-0dIJ29OR6vrKFxjHPj8Ai9nL_8_rFXmQAMQbYtj3yHbfruxrgGi9mpGdo5OLL19n_hUH_H5axDNvkn8AmwZDeQ
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consumer-priced+wearable+sensors+combined+with+deep+learning+can+be+used+to+accurately+predict+ground+reaction+forces+during+various+treadmill+running+conditions&rft.jtitle=PeerJ+%28San+Francisco%2C+CA%29&rft.au=Carter%2C+Josh&rft.au=Chen%2C+Xi&rft.au=Cazzola%2C+Dario&rft.au=Trewartha%2C+Grant&rft.date=2024-08-29&rft.pub=PeerJ.+Ltd&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=e17896&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717%2Fpeerj.17896&rft.externalDocID=A813429289
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2167-8359&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2167-8359&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2167-8359&client=summon