Consumer-priced wearable sensors combined with deep learning can be used to accurately predict ground reaction forces during various treadmill running conditions
Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the e...
Saved in:
Published in | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) Vol. 12; p. e17896 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
PeerJ. Ltd
29.08.2024
PeerJ Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical $(GRF_v)$ and anteroposterior $(GRF_{ap})$ force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean $(GRF_v)$ rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the $(GRF_{ap})$ estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}
$(GRF_v)$\end{document}
(
G
R
F
v
)
and anteroposterior
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}
$(GRF_{ap})$\end{document}
(
G
R
F
a
p
)
force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}
$(GRF_v)$\end{document}
(
G
R
F
v
)
rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}
$(GRF_{ap})$\end{document}
(
G
R
F
a
p
)
estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods. Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical (GRFv) and anteroposterior (GRFap) force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean (GRFv) rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the (GRFap) estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods. Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical and anteroposterior force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods. Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical ( G R F v ) and anteroposterior ( G R F a p ) force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean ( G R F v ) rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the ( G R F a p ) estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods.Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical ( G R F v ) and anteroposterior ( G R F a p ) force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean ( G R F v ) rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the ( G R F a p ) estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods. Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical $(GRF_v)$ and anteroposterior $(GRF_{ap})$ force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean $(GRF_v)$ rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the $(GRF_{ap})$ estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods. Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF analysis can provide. Traditional methods typically limit GRF collection to controlled lab environments, recent studies have looked to combine the ease of use of wearable sensors with the statistical power of machine learning to estimate continuous GRF data outside of these restrictions. Before such systems can be deployed with confidence outside of the lab they must be shown to be a valid and accurate tool for a wide range of users. The aim of this study was to evaluate how accurately a consumer-priced sensor system could estimate GRFs whilst a heterogeneous group of runners completed a treadmill protocol with three different personalised running speeds and three gradients. Fifty runners (25 female, 25 male) wearing pressure insoles made up of 16 resistive sensors and an inertial measurement unit ran at various speeds and gradients on an instrumented treadmill. A long short term memory (LSTM) neural network was trained to estimate both vertical $(GRF_v)$(GRFv) and anteroposterior $(GRF_{ap})$(GRFap) force traces using leave one subject out validation. The average relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) was 3.2% and 3.1%, respectively. The mean $(GRF_v)$(GRFv) rRMSE across the evaluated participants ranged from 0.8% to 8.8% and from 1.3% to 17.3% in the $(GRF_{ap})$(GRFap) estimation. The findings from this study suggest that current consumer-priced sensors could be used to accurately estimate two-dimensional GRFs for a wide range of runners at a variety of running intensities. The estimated kinetics could be used to provide runners with individualised feedback as well as form the basis of data collection for running injury risk factor studies on a much larger scale than is currently possible with lab based methods. |
ArticleNumber | e17896 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Cazzola, Dario Chen, Xi Preatoni, Ezio Carter, Josh Trewartha, Grant |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Josh surname: Carter fullname: Carter, Josh organization: Department of Health, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom – sequence: 2 givenname: Xi surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Xi organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom – sequence: 3 givenname: Dario orcidid: 0000-0001-7877-6755 surname: Cazzola fullname: Cazzola, Dario organization: Department of Health, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom – sequence: 4 givenname: Grant orcidid: 0000-0002-9021-8956 surname: Trewartha fullname: Trewartha, Grant organization: School of Health and Life Sciences, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom – sequence: 5 givenname: Ezio orcidid: 0000-0001-5383-7072 surname: Preatoni fullname: Preatoni, Ezio organization: Department of Health, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39221284$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkktr3DAQgE1JadI0p96LoFAKZbfWw7Z0KmHpIxDopT0LWRrtapGlrWSn5Of0n1beTcpuiX2wmPnmYzSel9VZiAGq6jWul12Hu487gLRd4o6L9ll1QXDbLThtxNnR-by6ynlbl4eTtub0RXVOBSGYcHZR_VnFkKcB0mKXnAaDfoNKqveAMoQcU0Y6Dr0Lc8aNG2QAdsgXJriwRloF1AOackmPESmtp6RG8Pdol8A4PaJ1ilMwKIHSo4sB2Zg0ZGSmNNffqeTilNFY8mZw3qM0hYM5BuPmivyqem6Vz3D18L2sfn75_GP1bXH7_evN6vp2oRvWjgthm9b2xHakZgYzU3dW1KIDZakVHdYlKhQnlOneFJQIpssUoObY0toITC-rm4PXRLWVZRqDSvcyKif3gZjWUqXRaQ8StFENa7qiZ0zRvqcgLGG1ZaL00NLi-nRw7aZ-AKMhjEn5E-lpJriNXMc7iTFtW0Jnw_sHQ4q_JsijHFzW4L0KUCYmaS0EbzjvmoK-PaBrVXpzwcai1DMurzmmjAjCRaGWT1DlNTC4Mm2wrsRPCt4dFWxA-XGTo5_2P-UUfHN82X-3fFyyAuADoFPMOYGV2o1q9pQWnJe4lvMuy_0uy_0ul5oP_9U8ap-i_wIF-vjM |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1113_EP092240 crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2025_1507162 crossref_primary_10_1097_BPO_0000000000002950 |
Cites_doi | 10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980 10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 10.3389/fnbot.2022.913052 10.3390/s19235227 10.3390/s22093338 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.047 10.1101/2021.03.17.435901 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 10.3390/s23073428 10.1109/TBME.2020.3006158 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.03.002 10.1115/1.4055238 10.3390/s19071483 10.1007/s40279-019-01110-z 10.1080/02640419608727717 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102690 10.3390/s18082564 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3119658 10.3390/s21227709 10.1371/journal.pone.0210000 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2916476 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00604 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024 Carter et al. COPYRIGHT 2024 PeerJ. Ltd. 2024 Carter et al. 2024 Carter et al. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 Carter et al. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 PeerJ. Ltd. – notice: 2024 Carter et al. 2024 Carter et al. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.7717/peerj.17896 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Open Access Full Text url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2167-8359 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_ecda545797e44a3bb3e9f240f496fb63 PMC11366233 A813429289 39221284 10_7717_peerj_17896 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Nurvv Ltd – fundername: University of Bath |
GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 88I 8FE 8FH AAFWJ AAYXX ABUWG ADBBV ADRAZ AENEX AFKRA AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS AZQEC BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BHPHI BPHCQ CCPQU CITATION DIK DWQXO ECGQY GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HYE IAO IEA IHR IHW ITC KQ8 LK8 M2P M48 M7P M~E OK1 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC RPM W2D YAO CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF H13 NPM PQGLB PMFND 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-9f56fb2f7204d14d07f9097eaf3f971c04d9a8234cbdf56294c392e081f30d913 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2167-8359 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:18:59 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:31:52 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 15:52:46 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:02:32 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:00:46 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:24:27 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:58:47 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:23:23 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:41 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Biomechanics IMU LSTM Training load Machine learning Human locomotion Distance running Biofeedback Pressure insole |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2024 Carter et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c546t-9f56fb2f7204d14d07f9097eaf3f971c04d9a8234cbdf56294c392e081f30d913 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-7877-6755 0000-0002-9021-8956 0000-0001-5383-7072 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.7717/peerj.17896 |
PMID | 39221284 |
PQID | 3099858875 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ecda545797e44a3bb3e9f240f496fb63 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11366233 proquest_miscellaneous_3099858875 gale_infotracmisc_A813429289 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A813429289 gale_healthsolutions_A813429289 pubmed_primary_39221284 crossref_citationtrail_10_7717_peerj_17896 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_17896 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-08-29 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-08-29 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2024 text: 2024-08-29 day: 29 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Diego, USA |
PublicationTitle | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | PeerJ |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | PeerJ. Ltd PeerJ Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: PeerJ. Ltd – name: PeerJ Inc |
References | Matijevich (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-18) 2019; 14 Johnson (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-14) 2021; 68 Alcantara (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-1) 2021; 10 Benson (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-3) 2018; 63 Paszke (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-21) 2019; 32 Vaswani (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-23) 2017; 30 Honert (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-12) 2022; 22 Eguchi (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-8) 2019; 27 Dorschky (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-7) 2020; 8 Cerfoglio (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-5) 2021; 21 Hutabarat (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-13) 2021; 21 Giandolini (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-9) 2014; 47 Jones (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-15) 1996; 14 Ancillao (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-2) 2018; 18 Kim (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-16) 2023; 23 Gurchiek (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-10) 2019; 19 Kingma (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-17) 2014 Benson (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-4) 2019; 19 Hochreiter (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-11) 1997; 9 Ceyssens (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-6) 2019; 49 Matijevich (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-19) 2020; 74 Molnar (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-20) 2020 Taneja (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-22) 2022; 144 Xiang (10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-24) 2022; 16 |
References_xml | – year: 2014 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-17 article-title: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization publication-title: ArXiv preprint doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980 – volume: 30 start-page: 1 year: 2017 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-23 article-title: Attention is all you need publication-title: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 – volume: 16 start-page: e0203839 year: 2022 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-24 article-title: Recent machine learning progress in lower limb running biomechanics with wearable technology: a systematic review publication-title: Frontiers in Neurorobotics doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.913052 – volume: 19 start-page: 5227 issue: 23 year: 2019 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-10 article-title: Estimating biomechanical time-series with wearable sensors: a systematic review of machine learning techniques publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s19235227 – volume: 22 start-page: 3338 issue: 9 year: 2022 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-12 article-title: Estimating running ground reaction forces from plantar pressure during graded running publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s22093338 – volume: 63 start-page: 124 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-3 article-title: The use of wearable devices for walking and running gait analysis outside of the lab: a systematic review publication-title: Gait & Posture doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.047 – volume: 10 start-page: e12752 year: 2021 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-1 article-title: Predicting continuous ground reaction forces from accelerometers during uphill and downhill running: a recurrent neural network solution publication-title: PeerJ doi: 10.1101/2021.03.17.435901 – volume: 9 start-page: 1735 issue: 8 year: 1997 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-11 article-title: Long short-term memory publication-title: Neural Computation doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 – volume: 23 issue: 7 year: 2023 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-16 article-title: A deep learning model for 3d ground reaction force estimation using shoes with three uniaxial load cells publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s23073428 – volume: 68 start-page: 289 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-14 article-title: Multidimensional ground reaction forces and moments from wearable sensor accelerations via deep learning publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.3006158 – volume: 47 start-page: 1588 issue: 7 year: 2014 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-9 article-title: A simple field method to identify foot strike pattern during running publication-title: Journal of Biomechanics doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.03.002 – volume: 144 start-page: 121006 issue: 12 year: 2022 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-22 article-title: A feature-encoded physics-informed parameter identification neural network for musculoskeletal systems publication-title: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering doi: 10.1115/1.4055238 – volume: 19 start-page: 1483 issue: 7 year: 2019 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-4 article-title: Automated accelerometer-based gait event detection during multiple running conditions publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s19071483 – volume: 49 start-page: 1095 issue: 7 year: 2019 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-6 article-title: Biomechanical risk factors associated with running-related injuries: a systematic review publication-title: Sports Medicine doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01110-z – volume: 32 start-page: 8026 year: 2019 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-21 article-title: Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library publication-title: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems – volume: 14 start-page: 321 issue: 4 year: 1996 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-15 article-title: A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running publication-title: Journal of Sports Sciences doi: 10.1080/02640419608727717 – volume: 74 start-page: 102690 year: 2020 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-19 article-title: Combining wearable sensor signals, machine learning and biomechanics to estimate tibial bone force and damage during running publication-title: Human Movement Science doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102690 – volume-title: Interpretable machine learning: a guide for making black box models explainable year: 2020 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-20 – volume: 18 start-page: 2564 issue: 8 year: 2018 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-2 article-title: Indirect measurement of ground reaction forces and moments by means of wearable inertial sensors: a systematic review publication-title: Sensors (Basel) doi: 10.3390/s18082564 – volume: 21 start-page: 26470 issue: 23 year: 2021 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-13 article-title: Recent advances in quantitative gait analysis using wearable sensors: a review publication-title: IEEE Sensors Journal doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3119658 – volume: 21 start-page: 7709 issue: 22 year: 2021 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-5 article-title: Machine learning-based estimation of ground reaction forces and knee joint kinetics from inertial sensors while performing a vertical drop jump publication-title: Sensors doi: 10.3390/s21227709 – volume: 14 start-page: e0210000 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-18 article-title: Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: implications for science, sport and wearable tech publication-title: PLOS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210000 – volume: 27 start-page: 1217 issue: 6 year: 2019 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-8 article-title: Insole-based estimation of vertical ground reaction force using one-step learning with probabilistic regression and data augmentation publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2916476 – volume: 8 start-page: 78 year: 2020 ident: 10.7717/peerj.17896/ref-7 article-title: CNN-based estimation of sagittal plane walking and running biomechanics from measured and simulated inertial sensor data publication-title: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00604 |
SSID | ssj0000826083 |
Score | 2.3638182 |
Snippet | Ground reaction force (GRF) data is often collected for the biomechanical analysis of running, due to the performance and injury risk insights that GRF... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | e17896 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology Biomechanics Computational Science Consumer behavior Data Mining and Machine Learning Deep Learning Distance running Exercise Test - instrumentation Exercise Test - methods Female Humans IMU Kinesiology LSTM Machine learning Male Medical research Medicine, Experimental Neural networks Pressure insole Running Running - physiology Sensors Somatotropin releasing hormone Sports Injury Wearable Electronic Devices Young Adult |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Ni9YwEA6yB_EifltdNcKCIJRtm7RJjuvisgh6cmFvIZ_uwtKWvq3iz_GfOpN2X1oUvHhthrbJTDLPtDPPEHIkghe18AK2uDU5dyzm0vIqN42yUvoiOp8SZL805xf802V9uWr1hTlhMz3wvHDHwXkDXl4oETg3zFoWVAQ3FLlqom0Szyf4vFUwlc5gQM0ALuaCPAEhy3EfwoDpOxLp-VcuKDH1_3kerxzSNlly5X3OHpD7C2ykJ_PrPiR3QvuI3P28_Bh_TH6dLqWUeY8sQZ7-AAvGqii6gzi1G3YULAuCYBy5Hq-oD6GnS8eIbxSWl9pApx0Mjx01zk3IIHHzk_YDPmKkWPzRegoIM9VBUIC6cMDQuciRfoeAu5t2FLPWPfYxosPUznfu8Jc4mvYTcnH28evpeb50X8hdzZsxV7GGBa4idrHxJfeFiKoALZjIohKlg6vKyIpxZz2IVgoUraoAECOywquSPSUHbdeG54Qy662vG1CdAwDUcCNBmaU1MTrRFK7KyPtbhWi3UJNjh4wbDSEKak8n7emkvYwc7YX7mZHj72IfULN7EaTRThfAuPRiXPpfxpWRN2gXeq5J3R8G-kSWDPt8SZWRd0kCjwN4ZWeWqgaYOBJrbSQPN5Kwjd1m-O2t7Wkcwty3NoDuNAMQL2twBnVGns22uJ8VrHiFCCMjcmOlm2lvR9rrq8Qijs18APuyF_9joV6SexWgPfzYXqlDcjAOU3gFaG20r9PG_A0gnUS_ priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Consumer-priced wearable sensors combined with deep learning can be used to accurately predict ground reaction forces during various treadmill running conditions |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39221284 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3099858875 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11366233 https://doaj.org/article/ecda545797e44a3bb3e9f240f496fb63 |
Volume | 12 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9RAEF9qC-KL-N1oPVcoCEJqkt1ks0_SltYitIh4cG8h-9UWjiQmObV_jv-pM5vc0Wjx5R6yk9zOzszub5L5IGRfWCNSYQSYuCpDrpkLc8WTsMykynMTOW18gOxFdjbnnxfpYousm3GOC9jd6dphP6l5uzz49f3mIxg84NcDAd7Ih8baFiNzcpndIztwJAlsZXA-4ny_JQOIjnxJzgTrfAPqkEOu3t_3T04nX8T_36361lk1jaO8dTCdPiIPR0RJDwcVeEy2bPWE3D8fv5k_Jb-PxyzLsMECQob-BOXGhCnagQtbtx0FpQP_GEeu-ytqrG3o2EziksLKU2XpqoPhvqal1issLrG8oU2Lf9FTzAupDAXw6VMkKKBg2HvokP9If4AvXq86igHtBlsc0XZVDU-u8Ws5av0zMj89-XZ8Fo6NGUKd8qwPpUszpxKHDW5MzE0knIyksKVjTopYw1VZ5gnjWhkgTSTogEwsoA_HIiNj9pxsV3VldwllyiiTZopZDdgo42UuLI9V6ZwWWaSTgLxfC6TQY9VybJ6xLMB7QekVXnqFl15A9jfEzVCs426yI5TshgQrbPsLdXtZjAZbWG1KQJcC2OK8ZApmKB3AH8cl8J6xgLxBvSiGdNXNPlEc5jHDFmC5DMg7T4G6C1PW5ZjwAIxjza0J5d6EEixcT4bfrnWvwCEMi6ssyK5ggO_zFM6JNCAvBl3ccAUrniD4CEg-0dIJ29OR6vrKFxjHPj8Ai9nL_8_rFXmQAMQbYtj3yHbfruxrgGi9mpGdo5OLL19n_hUH_H5axDNvkn8AmwZDeQ |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consumer-priced+wearable+sensors+combined+with+deep+learning+can+be+used+to+accurately+predict+ground+reaction+forces+during+various+treadmill+running+conditions&rft.jtitle=PeerJ+%28San+Francisco%2C+CA%29&rft.au=Carter%2C+Josh&rft.au=Chen%2C+Xi&rft.au=Cazzola%2C+Dario&rft.au=Trewartha%2C+Grant&rft.date=2024-08-29&rft.pub=PeerJ.+Ltd&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=e17896&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717%2Fpeerj.17896&rft.externalDocID=A813429289 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2167-8359&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2167-8359&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2167-8359&client=summon |