Aerosol radiative forcings induced by substantial changes in anthropogenic emissions in China from 2008 to 2016
Anthropogenic emissions in China play an important role in altering the global radiation budget. Over the past decade, the strong clean-air policies in China have resulted in substantial reductions of anthropogenic emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and primary particulate matter, and air quality in...
Saved in:
Published in | Atmospheric chemistry and physics Vol. 21; no. 8; pp. 5965 - 5982 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Katlenburg-Lindau
Copernicus GmbH
21.04.2021
Copernicus Publications |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1680-7324 1680-7316 1680-7324 |
DOI | 10.5194/acp-21-5965-2021 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Anthropogenic emissions in China play an important role in
altering the global radiation budget. Over the past decade, the strong
clean-air policies in China have resulted in substantial reductions of
anthropogenic emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and primary particulate
matter, and air quality in China has consequently improved. However, the
resultant aerosol radiative forcings have been poorly understood. In this
study, we used an advanced global climate model integrated with the latest
localized emission inventory to quantify the aerosol radiative forcings by
the changes of anthropogenic emissions in China between 2008 and 2016. By
comparing with multiple observation datasets, our simulations reproduced the
considerable reductions of sulfate and black carbon (BC) mass loadings
reasonably well over eastern China (the key region subject to stringent
emission controls) during the period and accordingly showed a clear decline
in both aerosol optical depth and absorption aerosol optical depth. The
results revealed a regional annual mean positive direct radiative forcing
(DRF) of +0.29 W m−2 at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) due to the
reduction of SO2 emissions. This positive aerosol radiative forcing was
comprised of diminished sulfate scattering (+0.58 W m−2), enhanced
nitrate radiative effects (−0.29 W m−2), and could be completely offset
by the concurrent reduction of BC emissions that induced a negative BC DRF
of −0.33 W m−2. Despite the small net aerosol DRF (−0.05 W m−2)
at the TOA, aerosol–radiation interactions could explain the surface
brightening in China over the past decade. The overall reductions in
aerosol burdens and associated optical effects mainly from BC and sulfate
enhanced the regional annual mean downward solar radiation flux at the
surface by +1.0 W m−2 between 2008 and 2016. The enhancement was in
general agreement with a long-term observational record of surface energy
fluxes in China. We also estimated that aerosol effects on cloud radiative
forcings may have played a dominant role in the net aerosol radiative
forcings at the TOA in China and over the northern Pacific Ocean during the
study period. This study will facilitate more informed assessment of climate
responses to projected emissions in the future as well as to sudden changes
in human activities (e.g., the COVID-19 lockdown). |
---|---|
AbstractList | Anthropogenic emissions in China play an important role in altering the global radiation budget. Over the past decade, the strong clean-air policies in China have resulted in substantial reductions of anthropogenic emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO.sub.2) and primary particulate matter, and air quality in China has consequently improved. However, the resultant aerosol radiative forcings have been poorly understood. In this study, we used an advanced global climate model integrated with the latest localized emission inventory to quantify the aerosol radiative forcings by the changes of anthropogenic emissions in China between 2008 and 2016. By comparing with multiple observation datasets, our simulations reproduced the considerable reductions of sulfate and black carbon (BC) mass loadings reasonably well over eastern China (the key region subject to stringent emission controls) during the period and accordingly showed a clear decline in both aerosol optical depth and absorption aerosol optical depth. The results revealed a regional annual mean positive direct radiative forcing (DRF) of +0.29 W m.sup.-2 at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) due to the reduction of SO.sub.2 emissions. This positive aerosol radiative forcing was comprised of diminished sulfate scattering (+0.58 W m.sup.-2 ), enhanced nitrate radiative effects (-0.29 W m.sup.-2 ), and could be completely offset by the concurrent reduction of BC emissions that induced a negative BC DRF of -0.33 W m.sup.-2 . Despite the small net aerosol DRF (-0.05 W m.sup.-2) at the TOA, aerosol-radiation interactions could explain the surface brightening in China over the past decade. The overall reductions in aerosol burdens and associated optical effects mainly from BC and sulfate enhanced the regional annual mean downward solar radiation flux at the surface by +1.0 W m.sup.-2 between 2008 and 2016. The enhancement was in general agreement with a long-term observational record of surface energy fluxes in China. We also estimated that aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcings may have played a dominant role in the net aerosol radiative forcings at the TOA in China and over the northern Pacific Ocean during the study period. This study will facilitate more informed assessment of climate responses to projected emissions in the future as well as to sudden changes in human activities (e.g., the COVID-19 lockdown). Anthropogenic emissions in China play an important role in altering the global radiation budget. Over the past decade, the strong clean-air policies in China have resulted in substantial reductions of anthropogenic emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and primary particulate matter, and air quality in China has consequently improved. However, the resultant aerosol radiative forcings have been poorly understood. In this study, we used an advanced global climate model integrated with the latest localized emission inventory to quantify the aerosol radiative forcings by the changes of anthropogenic emissions in China between 2008 and 2016. By comparing with multiple observation datasets, our simulations reproduced the considerable reductions of sulfate and black carbon (BC) mass loadings reasonably well over eastern China (the key region subject to stringent emission controls) during the period and accordingly showed a clear decline in both aerosol optical depth and absorption aerosol optical depth. The results revealed a regional annual mean positive direct radiative forcing (DRF) of +0.29 W m−2 at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) due to the reduction of SO2 emissions. This positive aerosol radiative forcing was comprised of diminished sulfate scattering (+0.58 W m−2), enhanced nitrate radiative effects (−0.29 W m−2), and could be completely offset by the concurrent reduction of BC emissions that induced a negative BC DRF of −0.33 W m−2. Despite the small net aerosol DRF (−0.05 W m−2) at the TOA, aerosol–radiation interactions could explain the surface brightening in China over the past decade. The overall reductions in aerosol burdens and associated optical effects mainly from BC and sulfate enhanced the regional annual mean downward solar radiation flux at the surface by +1.0 W m−2 between 2008 and 2016. The enhancement was in general agreement with a long-term observational record of surface energy fluxes in China. We also estimated that aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcings may have played a dominant role in the net aerosol radiative forcings at the TOA in China and over the northern Pacific Ocean during the study period. This study will facilitate more informed assessment of climate responses to projected emissions in the future as well as to sudden changes in human activities (e.g., the COVID-19 lockdown). Anthropogenic emissions in China play an important role in altering the global radiation budget. Over the past decade, the strong clean-air policies in China have resulted in substantial reductions of anthropogenic emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) and primary particulate matter, and air quality in China has consequently improved. However, the resultant aerosol radiative forcings have been poorly understood. In this study, we used an advanced global climate model integrated with the latest localized emission inventory to quantify the aerosol radiative forcings by the changes of anthropogenic emissions in China between 2008 and 2016. By comparing with multiple observation datasets, our simulations reproduced the considerable reductions of sulfate and black carbon (BC) mass loadings reasonably well over eastern China (the key region subject to stringent emission controls) during the period and accordingly showed a clear decline in both aerosol optical depth and absorption aerosol optical depth. The results revealed a regional annual mean positive direct radiative forcing (DRF) of + 0.29 W m −2 at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) due to the reduction of SO 2 emissions. This positive aerosol radiative forcing was comprised of diminished sulfate scattering ( + 0.58 W m −2 ), enhanced nitrate radiative effects ( − 0.29 W m −2 ), and could be completely offset by the concurrent reduction of BC emissions that induced a negative BC DRF of − 0.33 W m −2 . Despite the small net aerosol DRF ( − 0.05 W m −2 ) at the TOA, aerosol–radiation interactions could explain the surface brightening in China over the past decade. The overall reductions in aerosol burdens and associated optical effects mainly from BC and sulfate enhanced the regional annual mean downward solar radiation flux at the surface by + 1.0 W m −2 between 2008 and 2016. The enhancement was in general agreement with a long-term observational record of surface energy fluxes in China. We also estimated that aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcings may have played a dominant role in the net aerosol radiative forcings at the TOA in China and over the northern Pacific Ocean during the study period. This study will facilitate more informed assessment of climate responses to projected emissions in the future as well as to sudden changes in human activities (e.g., the COVID-19 lockdown). Anthropogenic emissions in China play an important role in altering the global radiation budget. Over the past decade, the strong clean-air policies in China have resulted in substantial reductions of anthropogenic emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and primary particulate matter, and air quality in China has consequently improved. However, the resultant aerosol radiative forcings have been poorly understood. In this study, we used an advanced global climate model integrated with the latest localized emission inventory to quantify the aerosol radiative forcings by the changes of anthropogenic emissions in China between 2008 and 2016. By comparing with multiple observation datasets, our simulations reproduced the considerable reductions of sulfate and black carbon (BC) mass loadings reasonably well over eastern China (the key region subject to stringent emission controls) during the period and accordingly showed a clear decline in both aerosol optical depth and absorption aerosol optical depth. The results revealed a regional annual mean positive direct radiative forcing (DRF) of +0.29 W m-2 at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) due to the reduction of SO2 emissions. This positive aerosol radiative forcing was comprised of diminished sulfate scattering (+0.58 W m-2), enhanced nitrate radiative effects (-0.29 W m-2), and could be completely offset by the concurrent reduction of BC emissions that induced a negative BC DRF of -0.33 W m-2. Despite the small net aerosol DRF (-0.05 W m-2) at the TOA, aerosol–radiation interactions could explain the surface brightening in China over the past decade. The overall reductions in aerosol burdens and associated optical effects mainly from BC and sulfate enhanced the regional annual mean downward solar radiation flux at the surface by +1.0 W m-2 between 2008 and 2016. The enhancement was in general agreement with a long-term observational record of surface energy fluxes in China. We also estimated that aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcings may have played a dominant role in the net aerosol radiative forcings at the TOA in China and over the northern Pacific Ocean during the study period. This study will facilitate more informed assessment of climate responses to projected emissions in the future as well as to sudden changes in human activities (e.g., the COVID-19 lockdown). |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Liu, Mingxu Matsui, Hitoshi |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Mingxu orcidid: 0000-0002-1419-1990 surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Mingxu – sequence: 2 givenname: Hitoshi orcidid: 0000-0002-0376-0879 surname: Matsui fullname: Matsui, Hitoshi |
BookMark | eNp1UkuLFDEQDrKCu6t3jwFPHnpN0p1-HIfBx8CCsOo5VOfRk6EnGZO0uP9-a3YUnUXJoULV933U47siFyEGS8hrzm4kH5p3oA-V4JUcWlkJJvgzcsnbnlVdLZqLv_4vyFXOO8aEZLy5JHFlU8xxpgmMh-J_WOpi0j5MmfpgFm0NHe9pXsZcIBQPM9VbCJM9lilmtike4mSD19Tufc4-hsfSeusDUJfingrGeloiRt6-JM8dzNm--hWvybcP77-uP1W3nz9u1qvbSsumLVXvuOWGdVZKzRrZMYwAthtMXWs2Cq1RTEo7GmtEy7UBKzrgNXfjiFMO9TXZnHRNhJ06JL-HdK8iePWYiGlSkIrXs1UjKphuAOlG1jR2ANEJ1_dOSN65sZWo9eakdUjx-2JzUbu4pIDtK8RI2WJ39R_UBCjqg4slgcaVaLVq5SC46FmDqJt_oPAZ3J7GkzqP-TPC2zMCYor9WSZYclabL3fn2PaE1XjTnKxT2hc8KlIS-Flxpo5eUegVJbg6ekUdvYJE9oT4e2P_pTwA8pbA9g |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosres_2024_107552 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_154661 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41612_024_00811_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_su131810153 crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos12101254 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_22_8989_2022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2021_118553 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_158871 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_23_10117_2023 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_aca16a crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_22_8343_2022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_156731 crossref_primary_10_1029_2022JD036943 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_170823 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2025_109318 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosres_2024_107683 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11270_024_07224_z crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos15060629 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ad9294 crossref_primary_10_3390_atmos14071114 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs15235511 crossref_primary_10_1029_2022GL100543 crossref_primary_10_1038_s43017_022_00296_7 crossref_primary_10_1029_2022JD037623 crossref_primary_10_2151_sola_2021_042 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2023_119659 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_024_48793_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_cli10040050 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/2013GL058134 10.5194/amt-13-593-2020 10.5194/acp-19-9989-2019 10.1038/s41467-018-03997-0 10.1038/35055518 10.1038/s41561-019-0528-y 10.1126/sciadv.1601530 10.5194/acp-20-5729-2020 10.1126/science.255.5043.423 10.1002/jgrd.50171 10.1098/rsta.2010.0313 10.5194/acp-19-9125-2019 10.1002/2017EA000288 10.1002/2014MS000360 10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018 10.1038/s41598-017-14639-8 10.5194/acp-10-7685-2010 10.3390/rs12020208 10.1002/2017MS000937 10.1016/0004-6981(74)90004-3 10.5194/acp-18-2835-2018 10.1029/2019RG000660 10.5194/acp-20-1901-2020 10.1029/2018GL079239 10.1029/2019JD032316 10.5194/amt-11-6107-2018 10.1038/s41598-018-20382-5 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cb2 10.5194/acp-19-10773-2019 10.1002/2013GL057775 10.1073/pnas.1907956116 10.1038/srep43182 10.5194/acp-20-969-2020 10.1002/joc.4529 10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001 10.5194/acp-18-17933-2018 10.1002/2016JD025319 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016 10.5194/gmd-10-3329-2017 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105812 10.1002/2015RG000500 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00365.1 10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025 10.5194/acp-20-10231-2020 10.1002/2014JD022453 10.1021/acs.est.5b01658 10.1029/2006JD007147 10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018 10.1029/2001JD001397 10.5194/gmd-5-369-2012 10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012 10.1029/2019JD031827 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126849 10.5194/acp-20-6339-2020 10.1029/2020GL087721 10.1038/nature17165 10.5194/acp-14-10315-2014 10.5194/acp-18-13265-2018 10.1002/2014JD021710 10.1175/2008JCLI2105.1 10.1002/2016GL068707 10.1038/s41558-020-0840-y 10.1029/2019JD031301 10.1038/s41561-019-0424-5 10.1021/es971130j 10.1002/2014JD022301 10.1002/2017GL072617 10.5194/amt-12-169-2019 10.1002/2015JD023999 10.1002/2017MS000936 10.1038/s41467-018-05635-1 10.5194/acp-20-613-2020 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0666.1 10.5194/acp-13-9971-2013 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2021 Copernicus GmbH 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 Copernicus GmbH – notice: 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION ISR 7QH 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD 8FE 8FG ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO F1W GNUQQ H8D H96 HCIFZ KL. L.G L7M P5Z P62 PATMY PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PYCSY DOA |
DOI | 10.5194/acp-21-5965-2021 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Gale In Context: Science Aqualine Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection (subscription) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Continental Europe Database Technology collection Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts ProQuest Central Student Aerospace Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources SciTech Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace AAdvanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (subscription) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Environmental Science Database Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database (subscription) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Collection DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences Aerospace Database ProQuest One Sustainability Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Technology Collection Continental Europe Database ProQuest SciTech Collection Aqualine Environmental Science Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Meteorology & Climatology |
EISSN | 1680-7324 |
EndPage | 5982 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_bd26d79a5fb044e9a272f88f2517fb65 A659212804 10_5194_acp_21_5965_2021 |
GeographicLocations | China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
GroupedDBID | 23N 2WC 4P2 5GY 5VS 6J9 7XC 8FE 8FG 8FH 8R4 8R5 AAFWJ AAYXX ABUWG ACGFO ADBBV AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHGZY AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ARAPS ATCPS BCNDV BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR BPHCQ CCPQU CITATION D1K E3Z EBS EDH EJD FD6 GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HCIFZ HH5 IAO IEA ISR ITC K6- KQ8 OK1 OVT P2P P62 PATMY PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PYCSY Q2X RKB RNS TR2 XSB ~02 BBORY PMFND 7QH 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD AZQEC C1K DWQXO F1W GNUQQ H8D H96 KL. L.G L7M PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-8f1e1d07e55c0457055caae79d33c0b2cc20155ebded261cdae27a131fbb73293 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 1680-7324 1680-7316 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:25:09 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 26 00:08:39 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:18:58 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:45:52 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 03:46:22 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:01:23 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:17 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 8 |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c546t-8f1e1d07e55c0457055caae79d33c0b2cc20155ebded261cdae27a131fbb73293 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-0376-0879 0000-0002-1419-1990 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2515560553?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PQID | 2515560553 |
PQPubID | 105744 |
PageCount | 18 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_bd26d79a5fb044e9a272f88f2517fb65 proquest_journals_2515560553 gale_infotracmisc_A659212804 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A659212804 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A659212804 crossref_citationtrail_10_5194_acp_21_5965_2021 crossref_primary_10_5194_acp_21_5965_2021 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-04-21 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-04-21 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2021 text: 2021-04-21 day: 21 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Katlenburg-Lindau |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Katlenburg-Lindau |
PublicationTitle | Atmospheric chemistry and physics |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Copernicus GmbH Copernicus Publications |
Publisher_xml | – name: Copernicus GmbH – name: Copernicus Publications |
References | ref13 ref57 ref12 ref56 ref15 ref59 ref14 ref58 ref53 ref52 ref11 ref55 ref10 ref54 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref51 ref50 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 ref35 ref34 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref75 ref30 ref74 ref33 ref77 ref32 ref76 ref2 ref1 ref39 ref38 ref71 ref70 ref73 ref72 ref24 ref68 ref23 ref67 ref26 ref25 ref69 ref20 ref64 ref63 ref22 ref66 ref21 ref65 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref60 ref62 ref61 |
References_xml | – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1002/2013GL058134 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.5194/amt-13-593-2020 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.5194/acp-19-9989-2019 – ident: ref47 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03997-0 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1038/35055518 – ident: ref57 doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0528-y – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601530 – ident: ref61 doi: 10.5194/acp-20-5729-2020 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1126/science.255.5043.423 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50171 – ident: ref66 doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0313 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.5194/acp-19-9125-2019 – ident: ref59 doi: 10.1002/2017EA000288 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1002/2014MS000360 – ident: ref77 doi: 10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14639-8 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.5194/acp-10-7685-2010 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.3390/rs12020208 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.1002/2017MS000937 – ident: ref62 doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(74)90004-3 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.5194/acp-18-2835-2018 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1029/2019RG000660 – ident: ref73 doi: 10.5194/acp-20-1901-2020 – ident: ref50 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1029/2018GL079239 – ident: ref43 doi: 10.1029/2019JD032316 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.5194/amt-11-6107-2018 – ident: ref64 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20382-5 – ident: ref76 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cb2 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.5194/acp-19-10773-2019 – ident: ref56 doi: 10.1002/2013GL057775 – ident: ref75 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907956116 – ident: ref70 doi: 10.1038/srep43182 – ident: ref51 doi: 10.5194/acp-20-969-2020 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1002/joc.4529 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.5194/acp-18-17933-2018 – ident: ref68 doi: 10.1002/2016JD025319 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016 – ident: ref63 doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-3329-2017 – ident: ref58 – ident: ref67 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105812 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1002/2015RG000500 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00365.1 – ident: ref49 doi: 10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.5194/acp-20-10231-2020 – ident: ref55 doi: 10.1002/2014JD022453 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01658 – ident: ref60 doi: 10.1029/2006JD007147 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1029/2001JD001397 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.5194/gmd-5-369-2012 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012 – ident: ref65 doi: 10.1029/2019JD031827 – ident: ref69 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126849 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.5194/acp-20-6339-2020 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1029/2020GL087721 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1038/nature17165 – ident: ref45 doi: 10.5194/acp-14-10315-2014 – ident: ref52 doi: 10.5194/acp-18-13265-2018 – ident: ref72 doi: 10.1002/2014JD021710 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.1175/2008JCLI2105.1 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1002/2016GL068707 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-0840-y – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1029/2019JD031301 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0424-5 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1021/es971130j – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1002/2014JD022301 – ident: ref74 doi: 10.1002/2017GL072617 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.5194/amt-12-169-2019 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1002/2015JD023999 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1002/2017MS000936 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05635-1 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.5194/acp-20-613-2020 – ident: ref71 doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0666.1 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.5194/acp-13-9971-2013 |
SSID | ssj0025014 |
Score | 2.4936576 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Anthropogenic emissions in China play an important role in
altering the global radiation budget. Over the past decade, the strong
clean-air policies in China... Anthropogenic emissions in China play an important role in altering the global radiation budget. Over the past decade, the strong clean-air policies in China... |
SourceID | doaj proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 5965 |
SubjectTerms | Aerosol absorption Aerosol effects Aerosol optical depth Aerosols Air pollution Air quality Analysis Anthropogenic factors Black carbon Brightening Carbon Climate Climate models Clouds COVID-19 Emission inventories Emissions Emissions (Pollution) Emissions control Environmental aspects Environmental assessment Estimates Experiments Fluxes Global climate Global climate models Global radiation Human influences Humidity Industrial plant emissions Optical analysis Optical thickness Particulate emissions Particulate matter Radiation budget Radiation flux Radiative forcing Simulation Solar radiation Sulfates Sulfur Sulfur dioxide Sulphur Sulphur dioxide Surface energy Surface properties Suspended particulate matter |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1NbxMxELWqnnqpgIJYKJWFEIiDlbXXXnuPadWqIMGBtlJvlj9RpShbJemBf8-M16maA3DhFCV2spuZWfuNPX6PkA9Ze52GyBn3LjLZR8O86DQbTBtMMFmYqUD2e395I7_eqtsnUl9YEzbRA0-Gm_ko-qgHp7JvpUyDE1pkAz-iuM6-L-ylMOdtk6maauFuGaZavWkZajNNG5SAVuTMhXsmOFMDlne1gu9MSIW3_0-jc5lyLp6Rw4oV6Xy6x-dkLy1fkOYbwNxxVVbD6Ud6trgDzFneHZFxnuAa44KukHEABzIKmDTgYjiF3Bu8GKn_RdcwWKB4MIQenQ7-YjN1VTMBQuouUNSBw5W00lRUtikeRaFYyUA3I7zy_iW5uTi_PrtkVVGBBSX7DTOZJx5bnZQKgOWQSSc4l_QQuy60XoQgEEMlHxOYnYfoktCOdzx7rztABq_I_nJcpteEAo5U8Lx7k_pOauU8CuJF5YQyKcsQGzLbmtWGSjeOqhcLC2kHOsKCI6zgFh1h0REN-fz4jfuJauMvfU_RU4_9kCS7fAChY2vo2H-FTkPeo58t0mAssc7mp3tYr-2Xqx92jrvNMHW3siGfaqc8wv0HV48tgBWQOWun5_FOT3BT2G3ehpOt48TaClTYgYxSdW_-xz96Sw7QOrjbJfgx2d-sHtI7AE0bf1Kej9_CThDO priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Aerosol radiative forcings induced by substantial changes in anthropogenic emissions in China from 2008 to 2016 |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2515560553 https://doaj.org/article/bd26d79a5fb044e9a272f88f2517fb65 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9swDBbW9rLL0O6BeesCYRg27CDEki1LPg1p0awb0GLrVqw3QS8XBYI4jdND_31JW0mRw3oyHNGIbVL0J5LiR8inRjkV68AZdzawsgqaOVEoVuvca68boYcC2fPq9LL8eSWvUsCtS2WVa5_YO-rQeoyRjwVykQD2lsW3xS1D1ijMriYKjR2yBy5Yg4XvHZ2c_7rYLLkwa4ZLrkrnDDmahkQloJZybP2CCc5kjWVeueBbH6a-f___vHT_6ZnukxcJM9LJoOQD8izOX5LsDOBuu-yj4vQzPZ7dAPbsz16RdhLhP9oZXWLnAXRoFLCpx6A4hTU4aDNQd087cBpIIgwmSIcNwDhMbeJOANO68RT54DCi1g_1bNsUt6RQrGigqxaOvHpNLqcnf49PWWJWYF6W1YrphkcechWl9IDpsKOOtzaqOhSFz53wXiCWii7EAEssH2wUyvKCN86pAhDCG7I7b-fxLaGAJyXMe6djVZRKWofEeEFaIXVsSh8yMl6_VuNT23Fkv5gZWH6gIgwowghuUBEGFZGRr5srFkPLjSdkj1BTGzlslt3_0C6vTZp7xsEzBFVb2bi8LGNthRKNBjuUXDWukhn5iHo22A5jjvU21_au68yPPxdmgllnsKy8zMiXJNS0cP_epu0L8Bawg9aW5OGWJKjJbw-vzckkf9GZR-t-9_Twe_IcnxvzWYIfkt3V8i5-AFi0ciOyo6ffR2kG4HF69vvfqA8yPADxhAzv |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwzV1Lb9NAEF5V6QEuvBGBAivEQxzceNde7_rAIS1ECW0qAa3obbsvVxFRXOUhVP4Kf4Ufx4wfQUGit0qcImcnUjyemf3GMzsfIS8LaWXIPYuYNT5KM68iyxMZ5Sp2yqmCq7pB9igbnqQfT8XpFvnZnoXBtso2JlaB2pcO35H3OHKRAPYWLVP1Qbj8DvnZ4t3oPTzMV5wPPhzvD6OGQiByIs2WkSpYYD6WQQgH4AVHxzhjgsx9krjYcuc4goZgffCQSzhvApeGJaywViYcJy1BfN9WuA93yPbeYPzp6zqfw5Ic5nOZiiMkgKqroACJ0p5xFxFnkcixhyzmbGPXq8gB_rUFVPva4Db51Wqkbmf5trta2l33469hkf-pyu6QWw2epv3aAe6SrTC7R7pjSAXKeVUxoK_p_nQCuLy6uk_KfgAVlVM6x6kMGOwp4HaHBQM6mXmwdE_tJV1AQEWCZXBPWh-OxmVqGl4JcLuJo8iVh28bq6WKiZzicR2K3R50WcInyx6Qk2u5_4ekMytn4RGhgLUFxESrQpakUhiLpIFeGC5UKFLnu6TXWoV2zUh2ZAaZakjN0I402JHmTKMdabSjLnm7_sVFPY7kCtk9NLS1HA4Sr74o5-e6iUvawj14mRtR2DhNQ2645IUCHxVMFjYTXfICzVTjqJAZ9iKdm9VioUdfPus-VuQB3sRpl7xphIoS_r8zzdEO0AJOF9uQ3NmQhMfkNpdbS9ZNLF3oP2b8-Orl5-TG8Hh8qA9HRwdPyE3UAdb9ONshneV8FZ4CfFzaZ40bU3J23W7wG4Kgezc |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LbxMxELaqIiEuiPIQCy1YiIc4WFl712vvAaHQEhoKFQIq9eb6tVWlKBuyqVD_Gr-OmX0E5UBvPUWJJ8rG8_A3Hns-Ql5WyqlYBs64s4HlRdDMiUyxUqdee10J3R2QPS4OT_LPp_J0i_wZ7sLgscohJraBOtQe98hHArlIAHvLbFT1xyK-HUzeL34xZJDCSutAp9GZyFG8-g3pW_NuegC6fiXE5OPP_UPWMwwwL_NixXTFIw-pilJ6wDbYWcZbG1UZssynTngvEFNEF2KAVMMHG4WyPOOVcyoT2IgJwv8tlekU2RP05NM62cN6HSZ7hU4ZskN1JVLAS_nI-gUTnMkSD5ilgm8siS1zwP_Wh3bRm9wjd3u0Ssedee2QrTi_T5KvALTrZbsfT1_T_dkFoN723QNSjyP8Rj2jS-x5gKGUAir2uB1PIfsHOwrUXdEGwhXSF4Px0-7qMQ5T27M2gFFfeIpMdLiX1w61PN8UL8NQPEtBVzW88uIhObmRGX9Etuf1PD4mFJCshIjjdCyyXEnrkJIvSCukjlXuQ0JGw7Qa3zc8R96NmYHEBxVhQBFGcIOKMKiIhLxdf2PRNfu4RvYDamoth2262w_q5bnpvd44-A9BlVZWLs3zWFqhRKXBAyRXlStkQl6gng024pijSZ_by6Yx0x_fzRjr3QAe0jwhb3qhqobn97a_OAGzgL27NiR3NyRBTX5zeDAn00eqxvzzqyfXDz8nt8HhzJfp8dFTcgenAItqgu-S7dXyMu4BNlu5Z60TUHJ20173F7ryScc |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aerosol+radiative+forcings+induced+by+substantial+changes+in+anthropogenic+emissions+in+China+from+2008+to+2016&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric+chemistry+and+physics&rft.au=Liu%2C+Mingxu&rft.au=Matsui%2C+Hitoshi&rft.date=2021-04-21&rft.pub=Copernicus+GmbH&rft.issn=1680-7316&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=5965&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194%2Facp-21-5965-2021&rft.externalDocID=A659212804 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1680-7324&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1680-7324&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1680-7324&client=summon |