Using Drones to Study Human Beings: Ethical and Regulatory Issues

Researchers have used drones to track wildlife populations, monitor forest fires, map glaciers, and measure air pollution but have only begun to consider how to use these unmanned aerial vehicles to study human beings. The potential use of drones to study public gatherings or other human activities...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScience and engineering ethics Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 707 - 718
Main Authors Resnik, David B., Elliott, Kevin C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.06.2019
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Researchers have used drones to track wildlife populations, monitor forest fires, map glaciers, and measure air pollution but have only begun to consider how to use these unmanned aerial vehicles to study human beings. The potential use of drones to study public gatherings or other human activities raises novel issues of privacy, confidentiality, and consent, which this article explores in depth. It argues that drone research could fall into several different categories: non-human subjects research (HSR), exempt HSR, or non-exempt HSR. In the case of non-exempt HSR, it will be difficult for institutional review boards to approve studies unless they are designed so that informed consent can be waived. Whether drone research is non-HSR, exempt HSR, or non-exempt HSR, it is important for investigators to consult communities which could be affected by the research.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1353-3452
1471-5546
1471-5546
DOI:10.1007/s11948-018-0032-6