The Effect of Insulin Feedback on Closed Loop Glucose Control

Context:Initial studies of closed-loop proportional integral derivative control in individuals with type 1 diabetes showed good overnight performance, but with breakfast meal being the hardest to control and requiring supplemental carbohydrate to prevent hypoglycemia.Objective:The aim of this study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism Vol. 96; no. 5; pp. 1402 - 1408
Main Authors Steil, Garry M., Palerm, Cesar C., Kurtz, Natalie, Voskanyan, Gayane, Roy, Anirban, Paz, Sachiko, Kandeel, Fouad R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bethesda, MD Oxford University Press 01.05.2011
Copyright by The Endocrine Society
Endocrine Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0021-972X
1945-7197
1945-7197
DOI10.1210/jc.2010-2578

Cover

More Information
Summary:Context:Initial studies of closed-loop proportional integral derivative control in individuals with type 1 diabetes showed good overnight performance, but with breakfast meal being the hardest to control and requiring supplemental carbohydrate to prevent hypoglycemia.Objective:The aim of this study was to assess the ability of insulin feedback to improve the breakfast-meal profile.Design and Setting:We performed a single center study with closed-loop control over approximately 30 h at an inpatient clinical research facility.Patients:Eight adult subjects with previously diagnosed type 1 diabetes participated.Intervention:Subjects received closed-loop insulin delivery with supplemental carbohydrate as needed.Main Outcome Measures:Outcome measures were plasma insulin concentration, model-predicted plasma insulin concentration, 2-h postprandial and 3- to 4-h glucose rate-of-change following breakfast after 1 d of closed-loop control, and the need for supplemental carbohydrate in response to nadir hypoglycemia.Results:Plasma insulin levels during closed loop were well correlated with model predictions (R = 0.86). Fasting glucose after 1 d of closed loop was not different from nighttime target (118 ± 9 vs. 110 mg/dl; P = 0.38). Two-hour postbreakfast glucose was 132 ± 16 mg/dl with stable values 3–4 h after the meal (0.03792 ± 0.0884 mg/dl · min, not different from 0; P = 0.68) and at target (97 ± 6 mg/dl, not different from 90; P = 0.28). Three subjects required supplemental carbohydrates after breakfast on d 2 of closed loop.Conclusions/Interpretation:Insulin feedback can be implemented using a model estimate of concentration. Proportional integral derivative control with insulin feedback can achieve a desired breakfast response but still requires supplemental carbohydrate to be delivered in some instances. Studies assessing more optimal control configurations and safeguards need to be conducted.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-972X
1945-7197
1945-7197
DOI:10.1210/jc.2010-2578