Assessment of neuromuscular activity during maximal isometric contraction in supine vs standing body positions

When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of electromyography and kinesiology Vol. 50; no. NA; p. 102365
Main Authors Huseth, K., Aagaard, P., Gutke, A., Karlsson, Jón, Tranberg, Roy
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown. To evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk. Twelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22–51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position. MVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions. Present data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions.
AbstractList When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown. To evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk. Twelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22–51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position. MVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions. Present data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions.
When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown.BACKGROUNDWhen comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown.To evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk.AIMTo evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk.Twelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22-51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position.METHODSTwelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22-51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position.MVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions.RESULTSMVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions.Present data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions.CONCLUSIONPresent data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions.
Background: When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown. Aim To evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk. Methods: Twelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22-51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position. Results: MVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions. Conclusion: Present data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions.
AbstractBackgroundWhen comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown. AimTo evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk. MethodsTwelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22–51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position. ResultsMVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions. ConclusionPresent data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions.
Background: When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown. Aim: To evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk. Methods: Twelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22–51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position. Results: MVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions. Conclusion: Present data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd
ArticleNumber 102365
Author Gutke, A.
Huseth, K.
Aagaard, P.
Tranberg, Roy
Karlsson, Jón
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: K.
  surname: Huseth
  fullname: Huseth, K.
  email: kari.huseth@gu.se
  organization: Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden
– sequence: 2
  givenname: P.
  surname: Aagaard
  fullname: Aagaard, P.
  organization: Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, SDU Muscle Research Cluster (SMRC), University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
– sequence: 3
  givenname: A.
  surname: Gutke
  fullname: Gutke, A.
  organization: Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Unit of Physiotherapy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jón
  surname: Karlsson
  fullname: Karlsson, Jón
  organization: Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Roy
  surname: Tranberg
  fullname: Tranberg, Roy
  organization: Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31711013$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/290782$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
BookMark eNqNkluLFDEQhRtZcS_6E5Q8-tJjku70BdFlWbzBgg_qc0inq4fMdidtKhmdf2-aHvdhQca8pCi-cyjq1GV2Zp2FLHvJ6IZRVr3ZbXYwwr2xG05Zm3q8qMST7II1dZGLmrGzVFNB86pk7Dy7RNxRymra0GfZecESQFlxkdkbRECcwAbiBmIhejdF1HFUnigdzN6EA-mjN3ZLJvXbTGokBt0EwRtNtLPBL5izxFiCcTYWyB4JBmX7RdO5_kBmh2Zh8Hn2dFAjwovjf5X9-Pjh--3n_O7rpy-3N3e5FqUIOWs4H0DzemhFTUvG1aBLNRS6g4bDILomvbYb6opzQYXqxdCUqVM1RdeVoi2usnz1xV8wx07OPg3uD9IpI7dxlqm1jRJB8pbWDU_865WfvfsZAYOcDGoYR2XBRZS85FQIVlF6Gi1YSRkv2yahr45o7CboH6b4u_4EiBXQ3iF6GB4QRuUSs9zJY8xyiVmuMSfd20c6bYJaNpzSMONJ9fWqhpTA3oCXqA1YDb3xoIPsnTnp8P6Rgx6NNVqN93AA3LnobYpXMolcUvltOcTlDllbUJbKZPDu3wb_McAfscXxuA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_4102_sajp_v77i1_1578
crossref_primary_10_1142_S021951942240053X
crossref_primary_10_2339_politeknik_1051988
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.004
10.1152/jn.1996.75.6.2334
10.1097/JSM.0b013e31817f3e35
10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.11.013
10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.03.009
10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.09.004
10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00027-0
10.1159/000147692
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.014
10.1016/1050-6411(94)90026-4
10.1123/jab.13.2.135
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.11.001
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.12.007
10.1007/s00421-007-0589-2
10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00082-8
10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.013
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5211-08.2009
10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.05.018
10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.07.001
10.1051/sm/2015020
10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4
10.1249/01.MSS.0000084426.03247.93
10.1136/bjsports-2015-094776
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.003
10.1007/s00421-011-2141-7
10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.10.011
10.1123/jab.2016-0146
10.1016/0021-9290(96)84547-7
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.09.008
10.1080/001401300750004159
10.1152/japplphysiol.01070.2003
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2019 Elsevier Ltd
Elsevier Ltd
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2019 Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
ADTPV
AOWAS
F1U
DOI 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
SwePub
SwePub Articles
SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic




Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1873-5711
EndPage 102365
ExternalDocumentID oai_gup_ub_gu_se_290782
31711013
10_1016_j_jelekin_2019_102365
S1050641119301506
1_s2_0_S1050641119301506
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29K
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
D-I
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HEB
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
M29
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OH.
OHT
OT.
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
TWZ
UPT
WUQ
YQT
Z5R
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
NPM
7X8
ADTPV
AOWAS
F1U
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-1822fec27f9570412afc4af3cbe82ef5b88889bf7622505ad5f84889683bb4593
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 1050-6411
1873-5711
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 06:57:18 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 15:32:23 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 05:28:17 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:31:41 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:25 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:30:34 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:48:03 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:18:42 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 19:57:00 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue NA
Language English
License Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c545t-1822fec27f9570412afc4af3cbe82ef5b88889bf7622505ad5f84889683bb4593
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 31711013
PQID 2314012498
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_290782
proquest_miscellaneous_2420551600
proquest_miscellaneous_2314012498
pubmed_primary_31711013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jelekin_2019_102365
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jelekin_2019_102365
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jelekin_2019_102365
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1050641119301506
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jelekin_2019_102365
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Journal of electromyography and kinesiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Electromyogr Kinesiol
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References Murley, Menz, Landorf, Bird (b0125) 2010; 43
Tucker, K., Butler, J., Thomas Graven-Nielsen, T., Riek, S., Hodges, P., 2009a.
Winter, Prince, Frank, Powell, Zabjek (b0175) 1996; 75
Ringheim, Austein, Indahl, Roeleveld (b0130) 2015; 42
Criswell (b0045) 2011
Clarys (b0035) 2000; 43
Abboud, Nougarou, Pagé, Cantin, Massicotte, Descarreaux (b0005) 2014
Kamen, Gabriel (b0080) 2010
Marshall, Murphy (b0110) 2003; 13
Simonsen, Dyhre-Poulsen, Voigt, Aagaard, Sjogaard, Bojsen-Moller (b0150) 1995; 152
Conrad (b0040) 2006
Srinivasan, Rudolfsson, Mathiassen (b0155) 2015; 25
Chapman, Vicenzino, Blanch, Knox, Hodges (b0030) 2010; 20
Zebis, Andersen, Brandt, Myklebust, Bencke, Lauridsen, Bandholm, Thorborg, Holmich, Aagaard (b0185) 2016; 50
Mcgill, Juker, Kropf (b0115) 1996; 29
Merletti, R., 2015. Standards for Reporting EMG Data. 2015 ed.
Burden, Trew, Baltzopoulos (b0025) 2003; 13
Hermens, Freriks, Disselhorst-Klug, Rau (b0070) 2000; 10
Maffiuletti, Lepers (b0105) 2003; 35
Woollacott (b0180) 2016
Simonsen, Alkjaer (b0145) 2012; 34
Saeterbakken, Fimland (b0135) 2012; 112
Schinkel-Ivy, Dimonte, Drake (b0140) 2015; 25
Freitas, Wieczorek, Marchetti, Duarte (b0065) 2005; 22
.
de Luca (bib191) 1997; 13
Koshino, Yamanaka, Ezawa, Okunuki, Ishida, Samukawa, Tohyama (b0095) 2017; 37
Knutson, Soderberg, Ballantyne, Clarke (b0085) 1994; 4
Madeleine, Farina (b0100) 2008; 102
Hirschfeld (b0075) 2007; 92
Tucker, Butler, Graven-Nielsen, Riek, Hodges (b0170) 2009; 29
Komar, Seifert, Thouvarecq (b0090) 2015
Barbero, Merletti, Rainoldi (b0015) 2012
Burden (b0020) 2010; 20
Dankaerts, O’sullivan, Burnett, Straker, Danneels (b0055) 2004; 14
Farino, Merletti, Roger, Enoka (b0060) 2004; 96
Albertus-Kajee, Tucker, Derman, Lamberts, Lambert (b0010) 2011; 21
Suydam, Manal, Buchanan (b0160) 2017; 33
Cronin, Kumpulainen, Joutjarvi, Finni, Piitulainen (b0050) 2015; 300
Zebis, Bencke, Andersen, Dossing, Alkjaer, Magnusson, Kjaer, Aagaard (b0190) 2008; 18
Mcgill (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0115) 1996; 29
Conrad (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0040) 2006
Knutson (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0085) 1994; 4
10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0120
Srinivasan (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0155) 2015; 25
Simonsen (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0145) 2012; 34
Simonsen (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0150) 1995; 152
Burden (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0020) 2010; 20
Maffiuletti (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0105) 2003; 35
Winter (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0175) 1996; 75
Ringheim (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0130) 2015; 42
Saeterbakken (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0135) 2012; 112
Komar (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0090) 2015
10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0165
Hirschfeld (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0075) 2007; 92
Kamen (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0080) 2010
Freitas (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0065) 2005; 22
Zebis (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0185) 2016; 50
Tucker (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0170) 2009; 29
Chapman (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0030) 2010; 20
Marshall (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0110) 2003; 13
Koshino (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0095) 2017; 37
de Luca (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_bib191) 1997; 13
Barbero (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0015) 2012
Farino (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0060) 2004; 96
Zebis (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0190) 2008; 18
Hermens (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0070) 2000; 10
Madeleine (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0100) 2008; 102
Murley (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0125) 2010; 43
Dankaerts (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0055) 2004; 14
Burden (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0025) 2003; 13
Woollacott (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0180) 2016
Abboud (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0005) 2014
Cronin (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0050) 2015; 300
Albertus-Kajee (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0010) 2011; 21
Schinkel-Ivy (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0140) 2015; 25
Suydam (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0160) 2017; 33
Criswell (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0045) 2011
Clarys (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0035) 2000; 43
References_xml – volume: 22
  start-page: 322
  year: 2005
  end-page: 330
  ident: b0065
  article-title: Age-related changes in human postural control of prolonged standing
  publication-title: Gait Posture
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1503
  year: 1996
  end-page: 1507
  ident: b0115
  article-title: Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine
  publication-title: J. Biomech.
– volume: 14
  start-page: 333
  year: 2004
  end-page: 342
  ident: b0055
  article-title: Reliability of EMG measurements for trunk muscles during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions in healthy controls and CLBP patients
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
– volume: 10
  start-page: 361
  year: 2000
  end-page: 374
  ident: b0070
  article-title: Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
– volume: 92
  start-page: 161
  year: 2007
  end-page: 166
  ident: b0075
  article-title: Motor control of every day motor tasks: guidance for neurological rehabilitation
  publication-title: Physiol. Behav.
– volume: 112
  start-page: 1671
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1678
  ident: b0135
  article-title: Muscle activity of the core during bilateral, unilateral, seated and standing resistance exercise
  publication-title: Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.
– volume: 37
  start-page: 75
  year: 2017
  end-page: 83
  ident: b0095
  article-title: Coupling motion between rearfoot and hip and knee joints during walking and single-leg landing
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
– year: 2012
  ident: b0015
  article-title: Atlas of Muscle Innervation Zones
– volume: 20
  start-page: 108
  year: 2010
  end-page: 117
  ident: b0030
  article-title: Intramuscular fine-wire electromyography during cycling: repeatability, normalisation and a comparison to surface electromyography
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
– volume: 152
  start-page: 133
  year: 1995
  end-page: 142
  ident: b0150
  article-title: Bone-on-bone forces during loaded and unloaded walking
  publication-title: Acta Anat. (Basel)
– volume: 25
  start-page: 121
  year: 2015
  end-page: 129
  ident: b0155
  article-title: Between- and within-subject variance of motor variability metrics in females performing repetitive upper-extremity precision work
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
– volume: 102
  start-page: 325
  year: 2008
  end-page: 333
  ident: b0100
  article-title: Time to task failure in shoulder elevation is associated to increase in amplitude and to spatial heterogeneity of upper trapezius mechanomyographic signals
  publication-title: Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.
– volume: 34
  start-page: 219
  year: 2012
  end-page: 224
  ident: b0145
  article-title: The variability problem of normal human walking
  publication-title: Med. Eng. Phys.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 135
  year: 1997
  end-page: 163
  ident: bib191
  article-title: The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics
  publication-title: J. Appl. Biomech.
– start-page: 1486
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1495
  ident: b0005
  article-title: Trunk motor variability in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain
  publication-title: Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.
– volume: 42
  start-page: 584
  year: 2015
  end-page: 589
  ident: b0130
  article-title: Postural strategy and trunk muscle activation during prolonged standing in chronic low back pain patients
  publication-title: Gait Post.
– volume: 43
  start-page: 749
  year: 2010
  end-page: 756
  ident: b0125
  article-title: Reliability of lower limb electromyography during overground walking: a comparison of maximal- and sub-maximal normalisation techniques
  publication-title: J. Biomech.
– volume: 75
  start-page: 2334
  year: 1996
  end-page: 2343
  ident: b0175
  article-title: Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance
  publication-title: J. Neurophysiol.
– reference: Merletti, R., 2015. Standards for Reporting EMG Data. 2015 ed. <
– volume: 25
  start-page: 232
  year: 2015
  end-page: 238
  ident: b0140
  article-title: Repeatability of kinematic and electromyographical measures during standing and trunk motion: how many trials are sufficient?
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
– volume: 29
  start-page: 10820
  year: 2009
  end-page: 10826
  ident: b0170
  article-title: Motor unit recruitment strategies are altered during deep-tissue pain
  publication-title: J. Neurosci.
– volume: 21
  start-page: 579
  year: 2011
  end-page: 586
  ident: b0010
  article-title: Alternative methods of normalising EMG during running
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
– volume: 96
  start-page: 1486
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1495
  ident: b0060
  article-title: The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG
  publication-title: J. Appl. Physiol.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1511
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1516
  ident: b0105
  article-title: Quadriceps femoris torque and EMG activity in seated versus supine position
  publication-title: Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
– start-page: 65
  year: 2015
  end-page: 77
  ident: b0090
  article-title: What Variability tells us about motor expertise: measurements and perspectives from a complex system approach
  publication-title: Mov. Sport Sci./Sci. Mot.
– volume: 13
  start-page: 477
  year: 2003
  end-page: 489
  ident: b0110
  article-title: The validity and reliability of surface EMG to assess the neuromuscular response of the abdominal muscles to rapid limb movement
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
– reference: >.
– volume: 300
  start-page: 19
  year: 2015
  end-page: 28
  ident: b0050
  article-title: Spatial variability of muscle activity during human walking: the effects of different EMG normalization approaches
  publication-title: Neuroscience
– volume: 18
  start-page: 329
  year: 2008
  end-page: 337
  ident: b0190
  article-title: The effects of neuromuscular training on knee joint motor control during sidecutting in female elite soccer and handball players
  publication-title: Clin. J. Sport Med.
– volume: 50
  start-page: 552
  year: 2016
  end-page: 557
  ident: b0185
  article-title: Effects of evidence-based prevention training on neuromuscular and biomechanical risk factors for ACL injury in adolescent female athletes: a randomised controlled trial
  publication-title: Br. J. Sports Med.
– year: 2010
  ident: b0080
  article-title: Essentials of Electromyography
– year: 2011
  ident: b0045
  article-title: Cram*s Introduction to surface Electromyography
– volume: 13
  start-page: 519
  year: 2003
  end-page: 532
  ident: b0025
  article-title: Normalisation of gait EMGs: a re-examination
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1750
  year: 2000
  end-page: 1762
  ident: b0035
  article-title: Electromyography in sports and occupational settings: an update of its limits and possibilities
  publication-title: Ergonomics
– volume: 20
  start-page: 1023
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1035
  ident: b0020
  article-title: How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
– volume: 4
  start-page: 47
  year: 1994
  end-page: 59
  ident: b0085
  article-title: A study of various normalization procedures for within day electromyographic data
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
– volume: 33
  start-page: 189
  year: 2017
  end-page: 196
  ident: b0160
  article-title: The advantages of normalizing electromyography to ballistic rather than isometric or isokinetic tasks
  publication-title: J. Appl. Biomech.
– reference: Tucker, K., Butler, J., Thomas Graven-Nielsen, T., Riek, S., Hodges, P., 2009a.
– year: 2016
  ident: b0180
  article-title: Motor Control
– year: 2006
  ident: b0040
  article-title: The ABC of EMG
– volume: 20
  start-page: 1023
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0020
  article-title: How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.004
– year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0080
– volume: 75
  start-page: 2334
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0175
  article-title: Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance
  publication-title: J. Neurophysiol.
  doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.6.2334
– volume: 18
  start-page: 329
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0190
  article-title: The effects of neuromuscular training on knee joint motor control during sidecutting in female elite soccer and handball players
  publication-title: Clin. J. Sport Med.
  doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31817f3e35
– volume: 20
  start-page: 108
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0030
  article-title: Intramuscular fine-wire electromyography during cycling: repeatability, normalisation and a comparison to surface electromyography
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.11.013
– volume: 21
  start-page: 579
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0010
  article-title: Alternative methods of normalising EMG during running
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.03.009
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0015
– volume: 37
  start-page: 75
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0095
  article-title: Coupling motion between rearfoot and hip and knee joints during walking and single-leg landing
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.09.004
– volume: 13
  start-page: 477
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0110
  article-title: The validity and reliability of surface EMG to assess the neuromuscular response of the abdominal muscles to rapid limb movement
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
  doi: 10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00027-0
– volume: 152
  start-page: 133
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0150
  article-title: Bone-on-bone forces during loaded and unloaded walking
  publication-title: Acta Anat. (Basel)
  doi: 10.1159/000147692
– volume: 43
  start-page: 749
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0125
  article-title: Reliability of lower limb electromyography during overground walking: a comparison of maximal- and sub-maximal normalisation techniques
  publication-title: J. Biomech.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.014
– volume: 4
  start-page: 47
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0085
  article-title: A study of various normalization procedures for within day electromyographic data
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
  doi: 10.1016/1050-6411(94)90026-4
– volume: 13
  start-page: 135
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_bib191
  article-title: The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics
  publication-title: J. Appl. Biomech.
  doi: 10.1123/jab.13.2.135
– volume: 22
  start-page: 322
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0065
  article-title: Age-related changes in human postural control of prolonged standing
  publication-title: Gait Posture
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.11.001
– volume: 25
  start-page: 232
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0140
  article-title: Repeatability of kinematic and electromyographical measures during standing and trunk motion: how many trials are sufficient?
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.12.007
– volume: 102
  start-page: 325
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0100
  article-title: Time to task failure in shoulder elevation is associated to increase in amplitude and to spatial heterogeneity of upper trapezius mechanomyographic signals
  publication-title: Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.
  doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0589-2
– volume: 13
  start-page: 519
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0025
  article-title: Normalisation of gait EMGs: a re-examination
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
  doi: 10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00082-8
– volume: 34
  start-page: 219
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0145
  article-title: The variability problem of normal human walking
  publication-title: Med. Eng. Phys.
  doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.013
– year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0040
– volume: 29
  start-page: 10820
  issue: 35
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0170
  article-title: Motor unit recruitment strategies are altered during deep-tissue pain
  publication-title: J. Neurosci.
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5211-08.2009
– start-page: 1486
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0005
  article-title: Trunk motor variability in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain
  publication-title: Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.
– volume: 92
  start-page: 161
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0075
  article-title: Motor control of every day motor tasks: guidance for neurological rehabilitation
  publication-title: Physiol. Behav.
  doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.05.018
– volume: 14
  start-page: 333
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0055
  article-title: Reliability of EMG measurements for trunk muscles during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions in healthy controls and CLBP patients
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.07.001
– year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0180
– start-page: 65
  issue: 89
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0090
  article-title: What Variability tells us about motor expertise: measurements and perspectives from a complex system approach
  publication-title: Mov. Sport Sci./Sci. Mot.
  doi: 10.1051/sm/2015020
– volume: 10
  start-page: 361
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0070
  article-title: Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
  doi: 10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1511
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0105
  article-title: Quadriceps femoris torque and EMG activity in seated versus supine position
  publication-title: Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
  doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000084426.03247.93
– volume: 50
  start-page: 552
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0185
  article-title: Effects of evidence-based prevention training on neuromuscular and biomechanical risk factors for ACL injury in adolescent female athletes: a randomised controlled trial
  publication-title: Br. J. Sports Med.
  doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094776
– ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0165
– volume: 300
  start-page: 19
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0050
  article-title: Spatial variability of muscle activity during human walking: the effects of different EMG normalization approaches
  publication-title: Neuroscience
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.003
– volume: 112
  start-page: 1671
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0135
  article-title: Muscle activity of the core during bilateral, unilateral, seated and standing resistance exercise
  publication-title: Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.
  doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2141-7
– volume: 25
  start-page: 121
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0155
  article-title: Between- and within-subject variance of motor variability metrics in females performing repetitive upper-extremity precision work
  publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.10.011
– volume: 33
  start-page: 189
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0160
  article-title: The advantages of normalizing electromyography to ballistic rather than isometric or isokinetic tasks
  publication-title: J. Appl. Biomech.
  doi: 10.1123/jab.2016-0146
– year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0045
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1503
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0115
  article-title: Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine
  publication-title: J. Biomech.
  doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)84547-7
– volume: 42
  start-page: 584
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0130
  article-title: Postural strategy and trunk muscle activation during prolonged standing in chronic low back pain patients
  publication-title: Gait Post.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.09.008
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1750
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0035
  article-title: Electromyography in sports and occupational settings: an update of its limits and possibilities
  publication-title: Ergonomics
  doi: 10.1080/001401300750004159
– volume: 96
  start-page: 1486
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0060
  article-title: The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG
  publication-title: J. Appl. Physiol.
  doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01070.2003
– ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0120
SSID ssj0017080
Score 2.289355
Snippet When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply...
AbstractBackgroundWhen comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is...
Background: When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is...
SourceID swepub
proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 102365
SubjectTerms adult
clinical article
controlled study
electromyography
female
gluteus medius muscle
human
human experiment
male
muscle isometric contraction
neuromuscular function
Orthopaedics
Ortopedi
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
standing
tibialis anterior muscle
trunk
young adult
Title Assessment of neuromuscular activity during maximal isometric contraction in supine vs standing body positions
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1050641119301506
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1050641119301506
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31711013
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2314012498
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2420551600
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/290782
Volume 50
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaqcuGCgPIIj8pIqLfsJs7LPq4qqgVEL1CpNyt27CoLSVZkU7UXfjszdhIErSjimmSyG3se3yQz3xDy1kLOoTQzIUS3JEwzk4Sl5RXONymVjbnJ3eiET6f5-iz9cJ6d75HjqRcGyypH3-99uvPW45HluJrLbV0vPwMygHgKtioSx5OHHexpgVq--DGXecRFxD0jQQZpElz9q4tnuVlswLV_rZEGNRaOxABjzO3x6Sb-_INc1AWkk4fkwYgk6cr_2Udkz7SPycGqhSy6uaZH1NV2upfmB6RdzQSctLPUkVg2g69BpdjagBMkqG9ZpE15VTdw57rvGpy3pamrZ_cdELRuaT9sAZvSy55OXTFUddU1nQvAnpCzk3dfjtfhOGkh1ICgdiEkGcwazQorsgIZuEqr09ImWhnOjM0U5MlcKAueEyFTWWWWg-WLnCdKpZlInpL9tmvNc0KriguTgyBS_TEk61fa5BAnuUiLstQBSaf1lXqkIcdpGN_kVG-2keO2SNwW6bclIItZbOt5OO4SyKfNk1OTKbhFCZHiLsHiNkHTj8bdy1j2TEbyhgIGhM-Sv-nwv_zom0m_JNg3frQpW9MNvQT8DSkwJMn8L9ekLMIPnlEUkGdeOedFAnwICC9OAnLktXU-g8TiF8NWwqGLQfZGMoF48cX_P8VLcp_h6whX1P6K7O--D-Y1YLadOnRGeUjurd5_XJ_-BMGVQr4
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEB6V9ACXqlCghgKLhHpz4_i5PkYVVUrbXGil3lZee7dywHaEY0T_PTO7thG0ooirnYmT3Xl84535BuCDxpxD5r5yMboFbhipwM00L2i-SSb1jKvYjE64WMaLq_DTdXS9BcdDLwyVVfa-3_p04637K9N-Nafrspx-RmSA8RRtNQ0MT94j2CZ2qmgC2_PTs8VyPExIPG5JCSLMlFDgVyPPdHW0Qu_-pSQm1FlqeAwozNwfou5C0D_4RU1MOtmFnR5Msrn9vU9hS9XPYG9eYyJd3bJDZso7zXvzPajnIwcnazQzPJZVZ8tQGXU30BAJZrsWWZX9KCv85rJtKhq5lTNT0m6bIFhZs7ZbIzxl31s2NMYw2RS3bKwBew5XJx8vjxduP2zBzRFEbVzMM3ytcj_RaZQQCVem8zDTQS4V95WOJKbKPJUanSehpqyINEfjT2MeSBlGafACJnVTq31gRcFTFaMgsf35xNcvcxVjqORpmGRZ7kA4rK_IeyZyGojxVQwlZyvRb4ugbRF2Wxw4GsXWlorjIYF42Dwx9JmiZxQYLB4STO4TVG1v362YidYXnrijgw7wUfI3Nf6Xh74f9EugidO5TVarpmsFQnDMgjFP5n_5TOh7dObpeQ68tMo5LhJCRAR5s8CBQ6ut4x3iFr_p1gIv3XSiVcJPCTK--v9_8Q4eLy4vzsX56fLsNTzx6e2EqXE_gMnmW6feIITbyLe9if4EqGpFbw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment+of+neuromuscular+activity+during+maximal+isometric+contraction+in+supine+vs+standing+body+positions&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+electromyography+and+kinesiology&rft.au=Huseth%2C+K.&rft.au=Aagaard%2C+P.&rft.au=Gutke%2C+A.&rft.au=Karlsson%2C+J%C3%B3n&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=1050-6411&rft.eissn=1873-5711&rft.volume=50&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jelekin.2019.102365&rft.externalDocID=S1050641119301506
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F10506411%2FS1050641119X00073%2Fcov150h.gif