Assessment of neuromuscular activity during maximal isometric contraction in supine vs standing body positions
When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence o...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of electromyography and kinesiology Vol. 50; no. NA; p. 102365 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.02.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown.
To evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk.
Twelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22–51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position.
MVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions.
Present data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions. |
---|---|
AbstractList | When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown.
To evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk.
Twelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22–51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position.
MVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions.
Present data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions. When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown.BACKGROUNDWhen comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown.To evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk.AIMTo evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk.Twelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22-51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position.METHODSTwelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22-51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position.MVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions.RESULTSMVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions.Present data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions.CONCLUSIONPresent data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions. Background: When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown. Aim To evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk. Methods: Twelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22-51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position. Results: MVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions. Conclusion: Present data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions. AbstractBackgroundWhen comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown. AimTo evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk. MethodsTwelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22–51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position. ResultsMVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions. ConclusionPresent data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions. Background: When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply standardized assessment protocol. Most frequently used method is the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). However, the influence of body posture on sEMG activity during MVIC testing remains largely unknown. Aim: To evaluate the MVIC method for sEMG normalization in supine versus standing positions for selected muscles of the lower extremity and trunk. Methods: Twelve healthy individuals participated; five females and seven males (age 22–51 yrs). sEMG signals were recorded bilaterally from mm tibialis anterior, gluteus medius, adductor longus, rectus abdominus, external oblique and internal oblique/transversus abdominus according to standardized test protocol. Two different body positions were used: supine and standing position. Results: MVIC peak sEMG signal amplitudes did not differ systematically between supine and standing test positions. Pronounced inter-subject variability in MVIC reference sEMG activity were observed between participants, during both supine and standing test positions. Conclusion: Present data demonstrate that MVIC EMG normalization is a biomechanically stable procedure that can be performed in a reproducible manner for the major leg and trunk muscles when comparing supine vs. standing test positions. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd |
ArticleNumber | 102365 |
Author | Gutke, A. Huseth, K. Aagaard, P. Tranberg, Roy Karlsson, Jón |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: K. surname: Huseth fullname: Huseth, K. email: kari.huseth@gu.se organization: Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden – sequence: 2 givenname: P. surname: Aagaard fullname: Aagaard, P. organization: Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, SDU Muscle Research Cluster (SMRC), University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark – sequence: 3 givenname: A. surname: Gutke fullname: Gutke, A. organization: Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Unit of Physiotherapy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden – sequence: 4 givenname: Jón surname: Karlsson fullname: Karlsson, Jón organization: Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden – sequence: 5 givenname: Roy surname: Tranberg fullname: Tranberg, Roy organization: Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31711013$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/290782$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index |
BookMark | eNqNkluLFDEQhRtZcS_6E5Q8-tJjku70BdFlWbzBgg_qc0inq4fMdidtKhmdf2-aHvdhQca8pCi-cyjq1GV2Zp2FLHvJ6IZRVr3ZbXYwwr2xG05Zm3q8qMST7II1dZGLmrGzVFNB86pk7Dy7RNxRymra0GfZecESQFlxkdkbRECcwAbiBmIhejdF1HFUnigdzN6EA-mjN3ZLJvXbTGokBt0EwRtNtLPBL5izxFiCcTYWyB4JBmX7RdO5_kBmh2Zh8Hn2dFAjwovjf5X9-Pjh--3n_O7rpy-3N3e5FqUIOWs4H0DzemhFTUvG1aBLNRS6g4bDILomvbYb6opzQYXqxdCUqVM1RdeVoi2usnz1xV8wx07OPg3uD9IpI7dxlqm1jRJB8pbWDU_865WfvfsZAYOcDGoYR2XBRZS85FQIVlF6Gi1YSRkv2yahr45o7CboH6b4u_4EiBXQ3iF6GB4QRuUSs9zJY8xyiVmuMSfd20c6bYJaNpzSMONJ9fWqhpTA3oCXqA1YDb3xoIPsnTnp8P6Rgx6NNVqN93AA3LnobYpXMolcUvltOcTlDllbUJbKZPDu3wb_McAfscXxuA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_4102_sajp_v77i1_1578 crossref_primary_10_1142_S021951942240053X crossref_primary_10_2339_politeknik_1051988 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.004 10.1152/jn.1996.75.6.2334 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31817f3e35 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.11.013 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.03.009 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.09.004 10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00027-0 10.1159/000147692 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.014 10.1016/1050-6411(94)90026-4 10.1123/jab.13.2.135 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.11.001 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.12.007 10.1007/s00421-007-0589-2 10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00082-8 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.013 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5211-08.2009 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.05.018 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.07.001 10.1051/sm/2015020 10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4 10.1249/01.MSS.0000084426.03247.93 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094776 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.003 10.1007/s00421-011-2141-7 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.10.011 10.1123/jab.2016-0146 10.1016/0021-9290(96)84547-7 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.09.008 10.1080/001401300750004159 10.1152/japplphysiol.01070.2003 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019 Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Ltd Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 Elsevier Ltd – notice: Elsevier Ltd – notice: Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 ADTPV AOWAS F1U |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic SwePub SwePub Articles SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1873-5711 |
EndPage | 102365 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_gup_ub_gu_se_290782 31711013 10_1016_j_jelekin_2019_102365 S1050641119301506 1_s2_0_S1050641119301506 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29K 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACIEU ACIUM ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CS3 D-I DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HEB HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M29 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OH. OHT OT. OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K TWZ UPT WUQ YQT Z5R ~G- AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR AAYXX AGRNS CITATION NPM 7X8 ADTPV AOWAS F1U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-1822fec27f9570412afc4af3cbe82ef5b88889bf7622505ad5f84889683bb4593 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 1050-6411 1873-5711 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 06:57:18 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 15:32:23 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 05:28:17 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:31:41 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:25 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:30:34 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:48:03 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:18:42 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 19:57:00 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | NA |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c545t-1822fec27f9570412afc4af3cbe82ef5b88889bf7622505ad5f84889683bb4593 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 31711013 |
PQID | 2314012498 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | swepub_primary_oai_gup_ub_gu_se_290782 proquest_miscellaneous_2420551600 proquest_miscellaneous_2314012498 pubmed_primary_31711013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jelekin_2019_102365 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jelekin_2019_102365 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jelekin_2019_102365 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1050641119301506 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jelekin_2019_102365 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2020 text: 2020-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Journal of electromyography and kinesiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Electromyogr Kinesiol |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
References | Murley, Menz, Landorf, Bird (b0125) 2010; 43 Tucker, K., Butler, J., Thomas Graven-Nielsen, T., Riek, S., Hodges, P., 2009a. Winter, Prince, Frank, Powell, Zabjek (b0175) 1996; 75 Ringheim, Austein, Indahl, Roeleveld (b0130) 2015; 42 Criswell (b0045) 2011 Clarys (b0035) 2000; 43 Abboud, Nougarou, Pagé, Cantin, Massicotte, Descarreaux (b0005) 2014 Kamen, Gabriel (b0080) 2010 Marshall, Murphy (b0110) 2003; 13 Simonsen, Dyhre-Poulsen, Voigt, Aagaard, Sjogaard, Bojsen-Moller (b0150) 1995; 152 Conrad (b0040) 2006 Srinivasan, Rudolfsson, Mathiassen (b0155) 2015; 25 Chapman, Vicenzino, Blanch, Knox, Hodges (b0030) 2010; 20 Zebis, Andersen, Brandt, Myklebust, Bencke, Lauridsen, Bandholm, Thorborg, Holmich, Aagaard (b0185) 2016; 50 Mcgill, Juker, Kropf (b0115) 1996; 29 Merletti, R., 2015. Standards for Reporting EMG Data. 2015 ed. Burden, Trew, Baltzopoulos (b0025) 2003; 13 Hermens, Freriks, Disselhorst-Klug, Rau (b0070) 2000; 10 Maffiuletti, Lepers (b0105) 2003; 35 Woollacott (b0180) 2016 Simonsen, Alkjaer (b0145) 2012; 34 Saeterbakken, Fimland (b0135) 2012; 112 Schinkel-Ivy, Dimonte, Drake (b0140) 2015; 25 Freitas, Wieczorek, Marchetti, Duarte (b0065) 2005; 22 . de Luca (bib191) 1997; 13 Koshino, Yamanaka, Ezawa, Okunuki, Ishida, Samukawa, Tohyama (b0095) 2017; 37 Knutson, Soderberg, Ballantyne, Clarke (b0085) 1994; 4 Madeleine, Farina (b0100) 2008; 102 Hirschfeld (b0075) 2007; 92 Tucker, Butler, Graven-Nielsen, Riek, Hodges (b0170) 2009; 29 Komar, Seifert, Thouvarecq (b0090) 2015 Barbero, Merletti, Rainoldi (b0015) 2012 Burden (b0020) 2010; 20 Dankaerts, O’sullivan, Burnett, Straker, Danneels (b0055) 2004; 14 Farino, Merletti, Roger, Enoka (b0060) 2004; 96 Albertus-Kajee, Tucker, Derman, Lamberts, Lambert (b0010) 2011; 21 Suydam, Manal, Buchanan (b0160) 2017; 33 Cronin, Kumpulainen, Joutjarvi, Finni, Piitulainen (b0050) 2015; 300 Zebis, Bencke, Andersen, Dossing, Alkjaer, Magnusson, Kjaer, Aagaard (b0190) 2008; 18 Mcgill (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0115) 1996; 29 Conrad (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0040) 2006 Knutson (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0085) 1994; 4 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0120 Srinivasan (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0155) 2015; 25 Simonsen (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0145) 2012; 34 Simonsen (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0150) 1995; 152 Burden (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0020) 2010; 20 Maffiuletti (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0105) 2003; 35 Winter (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0175) 1996; 75 Ringheim (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0130) 2015; 42 Saeterbakken (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0135) 2012; 112 Komar (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0090) 2015 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0165 Hirschfeld (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0075) 2007; 92 Kamen (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0080) 2010 Freitas (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0065) 2005; 22 Zebis (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0185) 2016; 50 Tucker (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0170) 2009; 29 Chapman (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0030) 2010; 20 Marshall (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0110) 2003; 13 Koshino (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0095) 2017; 37 de Luca (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_bib191) 1997; 13 Barbero (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0015) 2012 Farino (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0060) 2004; 96 Zebis (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0190) 2008; 18 Hermens (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0070) 2000; 10 Madeleine (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0100) 2008; 102 Murley (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0125) 2010; 43 Dankaerts (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0055) 2004; 14 Burden (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0025) 2003; 13 Woollacott (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0180) 2016 Abboud (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0005) 2014 Cronin (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0050) 2015; 300 Albertus-Kajee (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0010) 2011; 21 Schinkel-Ivy (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0140) 2015; 25 Suydam (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0160) 2017; 33 Criswell (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0045) 2011 Clarys (10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0035) 2000; 43 |
References_xml | – volume: 22 start-page: 322 year: 2005 end-page: 330 ident: b0065 article-title: Age-related changes in human postural control of prolonged standing publication-title: Gait Posture – volume: 29 start-page: 1503 year: 1996 end-page: 1507 ident: b0115 article-title: Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine publication-title: J. Biomech. – volume: 14 start-page: 333 year: 2004 end-page: 342 ident: b0055 article-title: Reliability of EMG measurements for trunk muscles during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions in healthy controls and CLBP patients publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. – volume: 10 start-page: 361 year: 2000 end-page: 374 ident: b0070 article-title: Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. – volume: 92 start-page: 161 year: 2007 end-page: 166 ident: b0075 article-title: Motor control of every day motor tasks: guidance for neurological rehabilitation publication-title: Physiol. Behav. – volume: 112 start-page: 1671 year: 2012 end-page: 1678 ident: b0135 article-title: Muscle activity of the core during bilateral, unilateral, seated and standing resistance exercise publication-title: Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. – volume: 37 start-page: 75 year: 2017 end-page: 83 ident: b0095 article-title: Coupling motion between rearfoot and hip and knee joints during walking and single-leg landing publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. – year: 2012 ident: b0015 article-title: Atlas of Muscle Innervation Zones – volume: 20 start-page: 108 year: 2010 end-page: 117 ident: b0030 article-title: Intramuscular fine-wire electromyography during cycling: repeatability, normalisation and a comparison to surface electromyography publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. – volume: 152 start-page: 133 year: 1995 end-page: 142 ident: b0150 article-title: Bone-on-bone forces during loaded and unloaded walking publication-title: Acta Anat. (Basel) – volume: 25 start-page: 121 year: 2015 end-page: 129 ident: b0155 article-title: Between- and within-subject variance of motor variability metrics in females performing repetitive upper-extremity precision work publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. – volume: 102 start-page: 325 year: 2008 end-page: 333 ident: b0100 article-title: Time to task failure in shoulder elevation is associated to increase in amplitude and to spatial heterogeneity of upper trapezius mechanomyographic signals publication-title: Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. – volume: 34 start-page: 219 year: 2012 end-page: 224 ident: b0145 article-title: The variability problem of normal human walking publication-title: Med. Eng. Phys. – volume: 13 start-page: 135 year: 1997 end-page: 163 ident: bib191 article-title: The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics publication-title: J. Appl. Biomech. – start-page: 1486 year: 2014 end-page: 1495 ident: b0005 article-title: Trunk motor variability in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain publication-title: Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. – volume: 42 start-page: 584 year: 2015 end-page: 589 ident: b0130 article-title: Postural strategy and trunk muscle activation during prolonged standing in chronic low back pain patients publication-title: Gait Post. – volume: 43 start-page: 749 year: 2010 end-page: 756 ident: b0125 article-title: Reliability of lower limb electromyography during overground walking: a comparison of maximal- and sub-maximal normalisation techniques publication-title: J. Biomech. – volume: 75 start-page: 2334 year: 1996 end-page: 2343 ident: b0175 article-title: Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance publication-title: J. Neurophysiol. – reference: Merletti, R., 2015. Standards for Reporting EMG Data. 2015 ed. < – volume: 25 start-page: 232 year: 2015 end-page: 238 ident: b0140 article-title: Repeatability of kinematic and electromyographical measures during standing and trunk motion: how many trials are sufficient? publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. – volume: 29 start-page: 10820 year: 2009 end-page: 10826 ident: b0170 article-title: Motor unit recruitment strategies are altered during deep-tissue pain publication-title: J. Neurosci. – volume: 21 start-page: 579 year: 2011 end-page: 586 ident: b0010 article-title: Alternative methods of normalising EMG during running publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. – volume: 96 start-page: 1486 year: 2004 end-page: 1495 ident: b0060 article-title: The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG publication-title: J. Appl. Physiol. – volume: 35 start-page: 1511 year: 2003 end-page: 1516 ident: b0105 article-title: Quadriceps femoris torque and EMG activity in seated versus supine position publication-title: Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. – start-page: 65 year: 2015 end-page: 77 ident: b0090 article-title: What Variability tells us about motor expertise: measurements and perspectives from a complex system approach publication-title: Mov. Sport Sci./Sci. Mot. – volume: 13 start-page: 477 year: 2003 end-page: 489 ident: b0110 article-title: The validity and reliability of surface EMG to assess the neuromuscular response of the abdominal muscles to rapid limb movement publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. – reference: >. – volume: 300 start-page: 19 year: 2015 end-page: 28 ident: b0050 article-title: Spatial variability of muscle activity during human walking: the effects of different EMG normalization approaches publication-title: Neuroscience – volume: 18 start-page: 329 year: 2008 end-page: 337 ident: b0190 article-title: The effects of neuromuscular training on knee joint motor control during sidecutting in female elite soccer and handball players publication-title: Clin. J. Sport Med. – volume: 50 start-page: 552 year: 2016 end-page: 557 ident: b0185 article-title: Effects of evidence-based prevention training on neuromuscular and biomechanical risk factors for ACL injury in adolescent female athletes: a randomised controlled trial publication-title: Br. J. Sports Med. – year: 2010 ident: b0080 article-title: Essentials of Electromyography – year: 2011 ident: b0045 article-title: Cram*s Introduction to surface Electromyography – volume: 13 start-page: 519 year: 2003 end-page: 532 ident: b0025 article-title: Normalisation of gait EMGs: a re-examination publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. – volume: 43 start-page: 1750 year: 2000 end-page: 1762 ident: b0035 article-title: Electromyography in sports and occupational settings: an update of its limits and possibilities publication-title: Ergonomics – volume: 20 start-page: 1023 year: 2010 end-page: 1035 ident: b0020 article-title: How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. – volume: 4 start-page: 47 year: 1994 end-page: 59 ident: b0085 article-title: A study of various normalization procedures for within day electromyographic data publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. – volume: 33 start-page: 189 year: 2017 end-page: 196 ident: b0160 article-title: The advantages of normalizing electromyography to ballistic rather than isometric or isokinetic tasks publication-title: J. Appl. Biomech. – reference: Tucker, K., Butler, J., Thomas Graven-Nielsen, T., Riek, S., Hodges, P., 2009a. – year: 2016 ident: b0180 article-title: Motor Control – year: 2006 ident: b0040 article-title: The ABC of EMG – volume: 20 start-page: 1023 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0020 article-title: How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.004 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0080 – volume: 75 start-page: 2334 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0175 article-title: Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance publication-title: J. Neurophysiol. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.6.2334 – volume: 18 start-page: 329 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0190 article-title: The effects of neuromuscular training on knee joint motor control during sidecutting in female elite soccer and handball players publication-title: Clin. J. Sport Med. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31817f3e35 – volume: 20 start-page: 108 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0030 article-title: Intramuscular fine-wire electromyography during cycling: repeatability, normalisation and a comparison to surface electromyography publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.11.013 – volume: 21 start-page: 579 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0010 article-title: Alternative methods of normalising EMG during running publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.03.009 – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0015 – volume: 37 start-page: 75 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0095 article-title: Coupling motion between rearfoot and hip and knee joints during walking and single-leg landing publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.09.004 – volume: 13 start-page: 477 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0110 article-title: The validity and reliability of surface EMG to assess the neuromuscular response of the abdominal muscles to rapid limb movement publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00027-0 – volume: 152 start-page: 133 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0150 article-title: Bone-on-bone forces during loaded and unloaded walking publication-title: Acta Anat. (Basel) doi: 10.1159/000147692 – volume: 43 start-page: 749 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0125 article-title: Reliability of lower limb electromyography during overground walking: a comparison of maximal- and sub-maximal normalisation techniques publication-title: J. Biomech. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.014 – volume: 4 start-page: 47 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0085 article-title: A study of various normalization procedures for within day electromyographic data publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/1050-6411(94)90026-4 – volume: 13 start-page: 135 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_bib191 article-title: The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics publication-title: J. Appl. Biomech. doi: 10.1123/jab.13.2.135 – volume: 22 start-page: 322 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0065 article-title: Age-related changes in human postural control of prolonged standing publication-title: Gait Posture doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.11.001 – volume: 25 start-page: 232 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0140 article-title: Repeatability of kinematic and electromyographical measures during standing and trunk motion: how many trials are sufficient? publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.12.007 – volume: 102 start-page: 325 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0100 article-title: Time to task failure in shoulder elevation is associated to increase in amplitude and to spatial heterogeneity of upper trapezius mechanomyographic signals publication-title: Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0589-2 – volume: 13 start-page: 519 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0025 article-title: Normalisation of gait EMGs: a re-examination publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00082-8 – volume: 34 start-page: 219 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0145 article-title: The variability problem of normal human walking publication-title: Med. Eng. Phys. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.013 – year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0040 – volume: 29 start-page: 10820 issue: 35 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0170 article-title: Motor unit recruitment strategies are altered during deep-tissue pain publication-title: J. Neurosci. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5211-08.2009 – start-page: 1486 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0005 article-title: Trunk motor variability in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain publication-title: Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. – volume: 92 start-page: 161 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0075 article-title: Motor control of every day motor tasks: guidance for neurological rehabilitation publication-title: Physiol. Behav. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.05.018 – volume: 14 start-page: 333 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0055 article-title: Reliability of EMG measurements for trunk muscles during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions in healthy controls and CLBP patients publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.07.001 – year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0180 – start-page: 65 issue: 89 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0090 article-title: What Variability tells us about motor expertise: measurements and perspectives from a complex system approach publication-title: Mov. Sport Sci./Sci. Mot. doi: 10.1051/sm/2015020 – volume: 10 start-page: 361 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0070 article-title: Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4 – volume: 35 start-page: 1511 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0105 article-title: Quadriceps femoris torque and EMG activity in seated versus supine position publication-title: Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000084426.03247.93 – volume: 50 start-page: 552 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0185 article-title: Effects of evidence-based prevention training on neuromuscular and biomechanical risk factors for ACL injury in adolescent female athletes: a randomised controlled trial publication-title: Br. J. Sports Med. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094776 – ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0165 – volume: 300 start-page: 19 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0050 article-title: Spatial variability of muscle activity during human walking: the effects of different EMG normalization approaches publication-title: Neuroscience doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.003 – volume: 112 start-page: 1671 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0135 article-title: Muscle activity of the core during bilateral, unilateral, seated and standing resistance exercise publication-title: Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2141-7 – volume: 25 start-page: 121 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0155 article-title: Between- and within-subject variance of motor variability metrics in females performing repetitive upper-extremity precision work publication-title: J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.10.011 – volume: 33 start-page: 189 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0160 article-title: The advantages of normalizing electromyography to ballistic rather than isometric or isokinetic tasks publication-title: J. Appl. Biomech. doi: 10.1123/jab.2016-0146 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0045 – volume: 29 start-page: 1503 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0115 article-title: Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine publication-title: J. Biomech. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)84547-7 – volume: 42 start-page: 584 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0130 article-title: Postural strategy and trunk muscle activation during prolonged standing in chronic low back pain patients publication-title: Gait Post. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.09.008 – volume: 43 start-page: 1750 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0035 article-title: Electromyography in sports and occupational settings: an update of its limits and possibilities publication-title: Ergonomics doi: 10.1080/001401300750004159 – volume: 96 start-page: 1486 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0060 article-title: The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG publication-title: J. Appl. Physiol. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01070.2003 – ident: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365_b0120 |
SSID | ssj0017080 |
Score | 2.289355 |
Snippet | When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is necessary to apply... AbstractBackgroundWhen comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is... Background: When comparing neuromuscular activity between different individuals or different conditions by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) it is... |
SourceID | swepub proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 102365 |
SubjectTerms | adult clinical article controlled study electromyography female gluteus medius muscle human human experiment male muscle isometric contraction neuromuscular function Orthopaedics Ortopedi Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation standing tibialis anterior muscle trunk young adult |
Title | Assessment of neuromuscular activity during maximal isometric contraction in supine vs standing body positions |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1050641119301506 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1050641119301506 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102365 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31711013 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2314012498 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2420551600 https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/290782 |
Volume | 50 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaqcuGCgPIIj8pIqLfsJs7LPq4qqgVEL1CpNyt27CoLSVZkU7UXfjszdhIErSjimmSyG3se3yQz3xDy1kLOoTQzIUS3JEwzk4Sl5RXONymVjbnJ3eiET6f5-iz9cJ6d75HjqRcGyypH3-99uvPW45HluJrLbV0vPwMygHgKtioSx5OHHexpgVq--DGXecRFxD0jQQZpElz9q4tnuVlswLV_rZEGNRaOxABjzO3x6Sb-_INc1AWkk4fkwYgk6cr_2Udkz7SPycGqhSy6uaZH1NV2upfmB6RdzQSctLPUkVg2g69BpdjagBMkqG9ZpE15VTdw57rvGpy3pamrZ_cdELRuaT9sAZvSy55OXTFUddU1nQvAnpCzk3dfjtfhOGkh1ICgdiEkGcwazQorsgIZuEqr09ImWhnOjM0U5MlcKAueEyFTWWWWg-WLnCdKpZlInpL9tmvNc0KriguTgyBS_TEk61fa5BAnuUiLstQBSaf1lXqkIcdpGN_kVG-2keO2SNwW6bclIItZbOt5OO4SyKfNk1OTKbhFCZHiLsHiNkHTj8bdy1j2TEbyhgIGhM-Sv-nwv_zom0m_JNg3frQpW9MNvQT8DSkwJMn8L9ekLMIPnlEUkGdeOedFAnwICC9OAnLktXU-g8TiF8NWwqGLQfZGMoF48cX_P8VLcp_h6whX1P6K7O--D-Y1YLadOnRGeUjurd5_XJ_-BMGVQr4 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEB6V9ACXqlCghgKLhHpz4_i5PkYVVUrbXGil3lZee7dywHaEY0T_PTO7thG0ooirnYmT3Xl84535BuCDxpxD5r5yMboFbhipwM00L2i-SSb1jKvYjE64WMaLq_DTdXS9BcdDLwyVVfa-3_p04637K9N-Nafrspx-RmSA8RRtNQ0MT94j2CZ2qmgC2_PTs8VyPExIPG5JCSLMlFDgVyPPdHW0Qu_-pSQm1FlqeAwozNwfou5C0D_4RU1MOtmFnR5Msrn9vU9hS9XPYG9eYyJd3bJDZso7zXvzPajnIwcnazQzPJZVZ8tQGXU30BAJZrsWWZX9KCv85rJtKhq5lTNT0m6bIFhZs7ZbIzxl31s2NMYw2RS3bKwBew5XJx8vjxduP2zBzRFEbVzMM3ytcj_RaZQQCVem8zDTQS4V95WOJKbKPJUanSehpqyINEfjT2MeSBlGafACJnVTq31gRcFTFaMgsf35xNcvcxVjqORpmGRZ7kA4rK_IeyZyGojxVQwlZyvRb4ugbRF2Wxw4GsXWlorjIYF42Dwx9JmiZxQYLB4STO4TVG1v362YidYXnrijgw7wUfI3Nf6Xh74f9EugidO5TVarpmsFQnDMgjFP5n_5TOh7dObpeQ68tMo5LhJCRAR5s8CBQ6ut4x3iFr_p1gIv3XSiVcJPCTK--v9_8Q4eLy4vzsX56fLsNTzx6e2EqXE_gMnmW6feIITbyLe9if4EqGpFbw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment+of+neuromuscular+activity+during+maximal+isometric+contraction+in+supine+vs+standing+body+positions&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+electromyography+and+kinesiology&rft.au=Huseth%2C+K.&rft.au=Aagaard%2C+P.&rft.au=Gutke%2C+A.&rft.au=Karlsson%2C+J%C3%B3n&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=1050-6411&rft.eissn=1873-5711&rft.volume=50&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jelekin.2019.102365&rft.externalDocID=S1050641119301506 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F10506411%2FS1050641119X00073%2Fcov150h.gif |