Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: What Have Animal Models Taught Us?

Studies have estimated that currently 344 million people worldwide and 16.4 million adults in the US have some form of dry eye disease (DED). It is believed that approximately 70% of DED cases are due to some form of evaporative dry eye, for which Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the major cause...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of molecular sciences Vol. 21; no. 22; p. 8822
Main Authors Sun, Mingxia, Moreno, Isabel Y, Dang, Michelle, Coulson-Thomas, Vivien J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 21.11.2020
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Studies have estimated that currently 344 million people worldwide and 16.4 million adults in the US have some form of dry eye disease (DED). It is believed that approximately 70% of DED cases are due to some form of evaporative dry eye, for which Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the major cause. Unfortunately, currently there is no effective treatment for MGD, and solely palliative care is available. Given the importance of MGD in DED, there has been a growing interest in studying Meibomian gland development, homeostasis and pathology, and, also, in developing therapies for treating and/or preventing MGD. For such, animal models have shown to be a vital tool. Much of what is known today about the Meibomian gland and MGD was learnt from these important animal models. In particular, canine and rabbit models have been essential for studying the physiopathology and progression of DED, and the mouse model, which includes different knockout strains, has enabled the identification of specific pathways potentially involved in MGD. Herein, we provide a bibliographic review on the various animal models that have been used to study Meibomian gland development, Meibomian gland homeostasis and MGD, primarily focusing on publications between 2000 and 2020.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Contributed equally.
ISSN:1422-0067
1661-6596
1422-0067
DOI:10.3390/ijms21228822