Comparison of laparoscopic excision versus open transvesical excision for symptomatic prostatic utricle in children

The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical excision (OTE) for the management of prostatic utricle (PU) in children. This was a retrospective single-center study of 14 children who underwent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of pediatric surgery Vol. 51; no. 10; pp. 1597 - 1601
Main Authors Jia, Wei, Liu, Guo-chang, Zhang, Li-yu, Wen, Ying-quan, Fu, Wen, Hu, Jin-hua, Xia, Hui-min
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical excision (OTE) for the management of prostatic utricle (PU) in children. This was a retrospective single-center study of 14 children who underwent OTE or LE for managing symptomatic PU between April 2003 and December 2014. Age, utricle size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, indwelling time of the urethral catheter, presence of residual postoperative utricular stump, and complications were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences in age or utricle size between the two groups. Compared to the OTE group, the LE group experienced shorter operative times, lower estimated blood losses, and shorter hospital stays. Indwelling time of the urethral catheter was nearly 8days in the OTE group and 6days in the LE group. All patients had a follow-up visit between 6months and 2years after surgery. Two patients in the OTE group had transient UTI. Postoperative VCUG showed minimal residual utricular stump for 3 patients in the OTE group. However, no patient in either group required further operative therapy. LE is a safe and feasible procedure for symptomatic PU in children. Compared to OTE, LE can provide minimally invasive access for achieving good exposure with good short-term outcomes.
AbstractList The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical excision (OTE) for the management of prostatic utricle (PU) in children. This was a retrospective single-center study of 14 children who underwent OTE or LE for managing symptomatic PU between April 2003 and December 2014. Age, utricle size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, indwelling time of the urethral catheter, presence of residual postoperative utricular stump, and complications were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences in age or utricle size between the two groups. Compared to the OTE group, the LE group experienced shorter operative times, lower estimated blood losses, and shorter hospital stays. Indwelling time of the urethral catheter was nearly 8days in the OTE group and 6days in the LE group. All patients had a follow-up visit between 6months and 2years after surgery. Two patients in the OTE group had transient UTI. Postoperative VCUG showed minimal residual utricular stump for 3 patients in the OTE group. However, no patient in either group required further operative therapy. LE is a safe and feasible procedure for symptomatic PU in children. Compared to OTE, LE can provide minimally invasive access for achieving good exposure with good short-term outcomes.
The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical excision (OTE) for the management of prostatic utricle (PU) in children.PURPOSEThe aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical excision (OTE) for the management of prostatic utricle (PU) in children.This was a retrospective single-center study of 14 children who underwent OTE or LE for managing symptomatic PU between April 2003 and December 2014. Age, utricle size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, indwelling time of the urethral catheter, presence of residual postoperative utricular stump, and complications were compared between the two groups.PATIENTS AND METHODSThis was a retrospective single-center study of 14 children who underwent OTE or LE for managing symptomatic PU between April 2003 and December 2014. Age, utricle size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, indwelling time of the urethral catheter, presence of residual postoperative utricular stump, and complications were compared between the two groups.There were no significant differences in age or utricle size between the two groups. Compared to the OTE group, the LE group experienced shorter operative times, lower estimated blood losses, and shorter hospital stays. Indwelling time of the urethral catheter was nearly 8days in the OTE group and 6days in the LE group. All patients had a follow-up visit between 6months and 2years after surgery. Two patients in the OTE group had transient UTI. Postoperative VCUG showed minimal residual utricular stump for 3 patients in the OTE group. However, no patient in either group required further operative therapy.RESULTSThere were no significant differences in age or utricle size between the two groups. Compared to the OTE group, the LE group experienced shorter operative times, lower estimated blood losses, and shorter hospital stays. Indwelling time of the urethral catheter was nearly 8days in the OTE group and 6days in the LE group. All patients had a follow-up visit between 6months and 2years after surgery. Two patients in the OTE group had transient UTI. Postoperative VCUG showed minimal residual utricular stump for 3 patients in the OTE group. However, no patient in either group required further operative therapy.LE is a safe and feasible procedure for symptomatic PU in children. Compared to OTE, LE can provide minimally invasive access for achieving good exposure with good short-term outcomes.CONCLUSIONSLE is a safe and feasible procedure for symptomatic PU in children. Compared to OTE, LE can provide minimally invasive access for achieving good exposure with good short-term outcomes.
Abstract Purpose The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical excision (OTE) for the management of prostatic utricle (PU) in children. Patients and methods This was a retrospective single-center study of 14 children who underwent OTE or LE for managing symptomatic PU between April 2003 and December 2014. Age, utricle size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, indwelling time of the urethral catheter, presence of residual postoperative utricular stump, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in age or utricle size between the two groups. Compared to the OTE group, the LE group experienced shorter operative times, lower estimated blood losses, and shorter hospital stays. Indwelling time of the urethral catheter was nearly 8 days in the OTE group and 6 days in the LE group. All patients had a follow-up visit between 6 months and 2 years after surgery. Two patients in the OTE group had transient UTI. Postoperative VCUG showed minimal residual utricular stump for 3 patients in the OTE group. However, no patient in either group required further operative therapy. Conclusions LE is a safe and feasible procedure for symptomatic PU in children. Compared to OTE, LE can provide minimally invasive access for achieving good exposure with good short-term outcomes.
Author Jia, Wei
Zhang, Li-yu
Liu, Guo-chang
Wen, Ying-quan
Fu, Wen
Hu, Jin-hua
Xia, Hui-min
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Wei
  surname: Jia
  fullname: Jia, Wei
  organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Guo-chang
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Guo-chang
  organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Li-yu
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Li-yu
  organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ying-quan
  surname: Wen
  fullname: Wen, Ying-quan
  organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Wen
  surname: Fu
  fullname: Fu, Wen
  organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Jin-hua
  surname: Hu
  fullname: Hu, Jin-hua
  organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Hui-min
  surname: Xia
  fullname: Xia, Hui-min
  email: xia-huimin@foxmail.com
  organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNUk2LFDEQDbLizq7-haWPXnqsJP0JIsqg7sKCBxW8hXRS0bTdSZt0Dzv_3rSzg7AHVyhIKnnvpapeLsiZ8w4JuaKwpUCrV_22n1DHJXzfspRvIQUUT8iGlpzmJfD6jGwAGMt5UTXn5CLGHiAdA31GzlnNeQsN35C48-Mkg43eZd5kg0yJj8pPVmV4p2y06WKPIS4x8xO6bA7SxT1Gq-TwF2F8yOJhnGY_yjlRpyQy_9ktc7BqwMy6TP2wgw7onpOnRg4RX9yvl-Trh_dfdtf57aePN7t3t7kqi2LONWhmuooidoU0DA3WLZStbApead7oDkxDjZYdclRFWTemVWVrOAXVYlkyfkleHnVTNb8WjLMYbVQ4DNKhX6KgDSsYY3XLE_TqHrp0I2oxBTvKcBCnQSXA6yNApc5iQCOUXRv0Lg3EDoKCWH0RvTj5IlZfBKSAItGrB_TTC48S3x6JmAa1txhEVBadQm0Dqllobx-XePNAQg3Wrf79xAPG3i_BJRsEFZEJEJ_XX7N-GlpxoLz89m-B_6ngN-Q-2hk
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2024_1270819
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2021_08_004
crossref_primary_10_1111_iju_14543
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2023_03_008
crossref_primary_10_1186_s43159_020_00062_8
crossref_primary_10_12935_jvma_77_e63
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2023_0055
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_epsc_2021_101982
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2022_01_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2017_01_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2017_09_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2024_03_006
crossref_primary_10_12677_ACM_2022_125718
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2022_01_018
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42804_021_00128_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijscr_2024_110523
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58010040
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2023_09_014
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55959-5
10.1007/s00383-003-0993-6
10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57627-2
10.1007/s003830050722
10.1016/0090-4295(79)90211-5
10.1111/j.1464-410X.1985.tb06356.x
10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.073
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64898-5
10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.00132.x
10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2012.07.002
10.1007/BF01349986
10.1111/j.1464-410X.1986.tb09097.x
10.1053/jpsu.2001.23958
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 Elsevier Inc.
Elsevier Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1531-5037
EndPage 1601
ExternalDocumentID 27339083
10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2016_06_004
S002234681630135X
1_s2_0_S002234681630135X
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
3O-
4.4
457
4CK
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQOH
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABPPZ
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CAG
COF
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HEF
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
L7B
M29
M32
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OK-
OW-
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UGJ
UHS
UV1
WUQ
X7M
Z5R
ZGI
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AHPSJ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
ZA5
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-d0d2fb61eeb4af2efe79059a8436d38db0f81fdabe3ec4578f9c59f310c9e5523
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0022-3468
1531-5037
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 10:07:42 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:54:45 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:54:45 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:32:04 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:22:42 EST 2024
Tue Feb 25 20:01:37 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 17:13:32 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Keywords Laparoscopic excision
Prostatic utricle
Open transvesical excision
Language English
License Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c544t-d0d2fb61eeb4af2efe79059a8436d38db0f81fdabe3ec4578f9c59f310c9e5523
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 27339083
PQID 1824222793
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1824222793
pubmed_primary_27339083
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2016_06_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2016_06_004
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2016_06_004
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S002234681630135X
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2016_06_004
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of pediatric surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate J Pediatr Surg
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Schuhrke, Kaplan (bb0010) 1978; 119
Husmann, Allen (bb0020) 1997; 157
Kass (bb0075) 1985; 2
Traxel, Minevich, Noh (bb0065) 2010; 76
Benedetto, Bagnara, Guys (bb0040) 1997; 12
Siegel, Brock, Pena (bb0030) 1995; 153
Yeung, Sihoe, Tam (bb0045) 2001; 87
Ikoma, Shima, Yabumoto (bb0055) 1985; 57
Smith, Middleton (bb0035) 1979; 14
Devine, Gonzalez-Serva, Stecker (bb0005) 1980; 123
Meisheri, Motiwale, Sawant (bb0015) 2000; 16
Willetts, Roberts, MacKinnon (bb0050) 2003; 19
Krstic, Smoljanic, Micovic (bb0025) 2001; 36
Ikoma, Shima, Yabumoto (bb0070) 1986; 58
Langer (bb0060) 2012; 21
Ikoma (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0055) 1985; 57
Traxel (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0065) 2010; 76
Siegel (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0030) 1995; 153
Benedetto (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0040) 1997; 12
Meisheri (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0015) 2000; 16
Smith (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0035) 1979; 14
Schuhrke (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0010) 1978; 119
Husmann (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0020) 1997; 157
Krstic (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0025) 2001; 36
Yeung (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0045) 2001; 87
Kass (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0075) 1985; 2
Willetts (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0050) 2003; 19
Langer (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0060) 2012; 21
Devine (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0005) 1980; 123
Ikoma (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0070) 1986; 58
References_xml – volume: 119
  start-page: 765
  year: 1978
  end-page: 767
  ident: bb0010
  article-title: Prostatic utricle cysts (mullerian duct cysts)
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 19
  start-page: 557
  year: 2003
  end-page: 558
  ident: bb0050
  article-title: Laparoscopic excision of a prostatic utricle in a child
  publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int
– volume: 58
  start-page: 423
  year: 1986
  end-page: 428
  ident: bb0070
  article-title: Surgical treatment for enlarged prostatic utricle and vagina masculina in patients with hypospadias
  publication-title: Br J Urol
– volume: 57
  start-page: 334
  year: 1985
  end-page: 337
  ident: bb0055
  article-title: Classification of enlarged prostatic utricle in patients with hypospadias
  publication-title: Br J Urol
– volume: 153
  start-page: 785
  year: 1995
  end-page: 787
  ident: bb0030
  article-title: Transrectal posterior sagittal approach to prostatic utricle (mullerian duct cyst)
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 12
  start-page: 151
  year: 1997
  end-page: 154
  ident: bb0040
  article-title: A transvesical approach to mullerian duct remnants
  publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int
– volume: 16
  start-page: 199
  year: 2000
  end-page: 203
  ident: bb0015
  article-title: Surgical management of enlarged prostatic utricle
  publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int
– volume: 123
  start-page: 407
  year: 1980
  end-page: 411
  ident: bb0005
  article-title: Utricular configuration in hypospadias and intersex
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 36
  start-page: 870
  year: 2001
  end-page: 876
  ident: bb0025
  article-title: Surgical treatment of the mullerian duct remnants
  publication-title: J Pediatr Surg
– volume: 2
  start-page: 1274
  year: 1985
  ident: bb0075
  article-title: Tumors: retroperitoneum: prostatic utricle cysts (mullerian duct cysts), Clinical pediatric urology
– volume: 157
  start-page: 1902
  year: 1997
  end-page: 1906
  ident: bb0020
  article-title: Endoscopic management of infected enlarged prostatic utricles and remnants of rectourethral fistula tracts of high imperforate anus
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 87
  start-page: 505
  year: 2001
  end-page: 508
  ident: bb0045
  article-title: Laparoscopic excision of prostatic utricles in children
  publication-title: BJU Int
– volume: 76
  start-page: 115
  year: 2010
  end-page: 120
  ident: bb0065
  article-title: A review: the application of minimally invasive surgery to pediatric urology: lower urinary tract reconstructive procedures
  publication-title: Urology
– volume: 14
  start-page: 44
  year: 1979
  end-page: 46
  ident: bb0035
  article-title: Surgical approach to large mullerian duct cysts
  publication-title: Urology
– volume: 21
  start-page: 283
  year: 2012
  end-page: 290
  ident: bb0060
  article-title: Laparoscopic and transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease
  publication-title: Semin Pediatr Surg
– volume: 123
  start-page: 407
  issue: 3
  year: 1980
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0005
  article-title: Utricular configuration in hypospadias and intersex
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55959-5
– volume: 19
  start-page: 557
  issue: 7
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0050
  article-title: Laparoscopic excision of a prostatic utricle in a child
  publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int
  doi: 10.1007/s00383-003-0993-6
– volume: 2
  start-page: 1274
  year: 1985
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0075
  article-title: Tumors: retroperitoneum: prostatic utricle cysts (mullerian duct cysts), Clinical pediatric urology
– volume: 119
  start-page: 765
  issue: 6
  year: 1978
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0010
  article-title: Prostatic utricle cysts (mullerian duct cysts)
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57627-2
– volume: 16
  start-page: 199
  issue: 3
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0015
  article-title: Surgical management of enlarged prostatic utricle
  publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int
  doi: 10.1007/s003830050722
– volume: 14
  start-page: 44
  issue: 1
  year: 1979
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0035
  article-title: Surgical approach to large mullerian duct cysts
  publication-title: Urology
  doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(79)90211-5
– volume: 57
  start-page: 334
  issue: 3
  year: 1985
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0055
  article-title: Classification of enlarged prostatic utricle in patients with hypospadias
  publication-title: Br J Urol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1985.tb06356.x
– volume: 76
  start-page: 115
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0065
  article-title: A review: the application of minimally invasive surgery to pediatric urology: lower urinary tract reconstructive procedures
  publication-title: Urology
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.073
– volume: 157
  start-page: 1902
  issue: 5
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0020
  article-title: Endoscopic management of infected enlarged prostatic utricles and remnants of rectourethral fistula tracts of high imperforate anus
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64898-5
– volume: 87
  start-page: 505
  issue: 6
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0045
  article-title: Laparoscopic excision of prostatic utricles in children
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.00132.x
– volume: 21
  start-page: 283
  issue: 4
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0060
  article-title: Laparoscopic and transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease
  publication-title: Semin Pediatr Surg
  doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2012.07.002
– volume: 12
  start-page: 151
  issue: 2/3
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0040
  article-title: A transvesical approach to mullerian duct remnants
  publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int
  doi: 10.1007/BF01349986
– volume: 58
  start-page: 423
  issue: 4
  year: 1986
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0070
  article-title: Surgical treatment for enlarged prostatic utricle and vagina masculina in patients with hypospadias
  publication-title: Br J Urol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1986.tb09097.x
– volume: 153
  start-page: 785
  issue: 3 Pt 1
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0030
  article-title: Transrectal posterior sagittal approach to prostatic utricle (mullerian duct cyst)
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 36
  start-page: 870
  issue: 6
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0025
  article-title: Surgical treatment of the mullerian duct remnants
  publication-title: J Pediatr Surg
  doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.23958
SSID ssj0003701
Score 2.267641
Snippet The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical...
Abstract Purpose The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1597
SubjectTerms Child
Child, Preschool
Diverticulum - congenital
Diverticulum - diagnosis
Diverticulum - surgery
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Infant
Laparoscopic excision
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay
Male
Open transvesical excision
Operative Time
Pediatrics
Prostatic utricle
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Urethral Diseases - congenital
Urethral Diseases - diagnosis
Urethral Diseases - surgery
Urinary Bladder - surgery
Urogenital Abnormalities - diagnosis
Urogenital Abnormalities - surgery
Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods
Title Comparison of laparoscopic excision versus open transvesical excision for symptomatic prostatic utricle in children
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S002234681630135X
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S002234681630135X
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339083
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1824222793
Volume 51
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELaqIiEuCMpreVRG4ppunDgPH6sV1ZZVe0BU7M1K7DHaVUmiJovgwm9nJnFSECCqcooTxZnIHs98ieebYexNnElwrjRBSvRfKaULihJbtnBpaURojSA28tl5uryQ79bJeo8tRi4MhVV62z_Y9N5a-ytzP5rzZrMhji-6NpnmiCgQxyRrYrDLjLT86Pt1mEechWLKGI53_8QS3h5tG7Dt7uoThXilfR5PX7DtDw7qbwC0d0QnD9h9jyD58fCSD9keVAfs7pnfI3_E2sVUWpDXjl-iN6SMlXWzMRy-DhV1OAVj7FpOtbN4R-7qC_TTdX0HglnefvvcdHWf1JU3RA_pW5S_HyXzTcVHKvhjdnHy9sNiGfjSCoFJpOwCG9rIlakAKGXhInBAibpUkcs4tXFuy9DlwtmihBiMxFXtlEmUQyxoFCT48fqE7Vd1Bc8YN0UGkTK5AJlKEPg4G9vIZCZWwqjczVgyjqc2Pu84lb-41GOA2VaP86BpHnQfaSdnbD71a4bMG__skY3TpUdeKVpCjc7hdj2h9Qu61UK3kQ71b0o3Y2rq-Yve3kjq61GnNC5q2qkpKqh3KC2P6Ncc2s4Zezoo2zQGiDdjhcD5-X9IfsHu0dkQlPiS7XdXO3iF4KorD_vVc8juHJ-ulud0XL3_uPoB9DsrHg
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB6VIgEXxJvlaSSu6caJ8_ARragW6PbUSnuzEnuMdtUmUZNF7YXfzjhxUhAgENysxBNHnteXeB4Ab-NMoLWlDlKX_iuEsEFR0sgUNi01D43mLht5dZwuT8XHdbLeg8WYC-PCKr3tH2x6b639lbnfzXmz2bgcX3JtIs0JURCOSdY34KYg9XVtDA6-Xsd5xFnIp5LhNP27NOHtwbZB0-4uPrsYr7Qv5Ok7tv3CQ_0Ogfae6PAe3PUQkr0b3vI-7GH1AG6t_CH5Q2gXU29BVlt2Ru7Qlaysm41meDm01GEuGmPXMtc8i3XOX33Bnl_XMwjNsvbqvOnqvqora1x-SD9yBfxpZbap2JgL_ghOD9-fLJaB760Q6ESILjChiWyZcsRSFDZCi65SlyxyEacmzk0Z2pxbU5QYoxak1lbqRFoCg1piQl-vj2G_qit8CkwXGUZS5xxFKpDT40xsIp3pWHItczuDZNxPpX3hcdf_4kyNEWZbNfJBOT6oPtROzGA-0TVD6Y0_UmQju9SYWEqmUJF3-DdKbL1Gt4qrNlKh-knqZiAnyh8E969WfTPKlCKtdkc1RYX1jlbLI_dvjoznDJ4MwjbtAQHOWBJyfvYfK7-G28uT1ZE6-nD86TnccXeGCMUXsN9d7PAlIa2ufNVr0jcpNisJ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+laparoscopic+excision+versus+open+transvesical+excision+for+symptomatic+prostatic+utricle+in+children&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+pediatric+surgery&rft.au=Jia%2C+Wei&rft.au=Liu%2C+Guo-chang&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Li-yu&rft.au=Wen%2C+Ying-quan&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0022-3468&rft.eissn=1531-5037&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1597&rft.epage=1601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jpedsurg.2016.06.004&rft.externalDocID=S002234681630135X
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00223468%2FS0022346816X00103%2Fcov150h.gif