Comparison of laparoscopic excision versus open transvesical excision for symptomatic prostatic utricle in children
The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical excision (OTE) for the management of prostatic utricle (PU) in children. This was a retrospective single-center study of 14 children who underwent...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of pediatric surgery Vol. 51; no. 10; pp. 1597 - 1601 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.10.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical excision (OTE) for the management of prostatic utricle (PU) in children.
This was a retrospective single-center study of 14 children who underwent OTE or LE for managing symptomatic PU between April 2003 and December 2014. Age, utricle size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, indwelling time of the urethral catheter, presence of residual postoperative utricular stump, and complications were compared between the two groups.
There were no significant differences in age or utricle size between the two groups. Compared to the OTE group, the LE group experienced shorter operative times, lower estimated blood losses, and shorter hospital stays. Indwelling time of the urethral catheter was nearly 8days in the OTE group and 6days in the LE group. All patients had a follow-up visit between 6months and 2years after surgery. Two patients in the OTE group had transient UTI. Postoperative VCUG showed minimal residual utricular stump for 3 patients in the OTE group. However, no patient in either group required further operative therapy.
LE is a safe and feasible procedure for symptomatic PU in children. Compared to OTE, LE can provide minimally invasive access for achieving good exposure with good short-term outcomes. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical excision (OTE) for the management of prostatic utricle (PU) in children.
This was a retrospective single-center study of 14 children who underwent OTE or LE for managing symptomatic PU between April 2003 and December 2014. Age, utricle size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, indwelling time of the urethral catheter, presence of residual postoperative utricular stump, and complications were compared between the two groups.
There were no significant differences in age or utricle size between the two groups. Compared to the OTE group, the LE group experienced shorter operative times, lower estimated blood losses, and shorter hospital stays. Indwelling time of the urethral catheter was nearly 8days in the OTE group and 6days in the LE group. All patients had a follow-up visit between 6months and 2years after surgery. Two patients in the OTE group had transient UTI. Postoperative VCUG showed minimal residual utricular stump for 3 patients in the OTE group. However, no patient in either group required further operative therapy.
LE is a safe and feasible procedure for symptomatic PU in children. Compared to OTE, LE can provide minimally invasive access for achieving good exposure with good short-term outcomes. The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical excision (OTE) for the management of prostatic utricle (PU) in children.PURPOSEThe aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical excision (OTE) for the management of prostatic utricle (PU) in children.This was a retrospective single-center study of 14 children who underwent OTE or LE for managing symptomatic PU between April 2003 and December 2014. Age, utricle size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, indwelling time of the urethral catheter, presence of residual postoperative utricular stump, and complications were compared between the two groups.PATIENTS AND METHODSThis was a retrospective single-center study of 14 children who underwent OTE or LE for managing symptomatic PU between April 2003 and December 2014. Age, utricle size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, indwelling time of the urethral catheter, presence of residual postoperative utricular stump, and complications were compared between the two groups.There were no significant differences in age or utricle size between the two groups. Compared to the OTE group, the LE group experienced shorter operative times, lower estimated blood losses, and shorter hospital stays. Indwelling time of the urethral catheter was nearly 8days in the OTE group and 6days in the LE group. All patients had a follow-up visit between 6months and 2years after surgery. Two patients in the OTE group had transient UTI. Postoperative VCUG showed minimal residual utricular stump for 3 patients in the OTE group. However, no patient in either group required further operative therapy.RESULTSThere were no significant differences in age or utricle size between the two groups. Compared to the OTE group, the LE group experienced shorter operative times, lower estimated blood losses, and shorter hospital stays. Indwelling time of the urethral catheter was nearly 8days in the OTE group and 6days in the LE group. All patients had a follow-up visit between 6months and 2years after surgery. Two patients in the OTE group had transient UTI. Postoperative VCUG showed minimal residual utricular stump for 3 patients in the OTE group. However, no patient in either group required further operative therapy.LE is a safe and feasible procedure for symptomatic PU in children. Compared to OTE, LE can provide minimally invasive access for achieving good exposure with good short-term outcomes.CONCLUSIONSLE is a safe and feasible procedure for symptomatic PU in children. Compared to OTE, LE can provide minimally invasive access for achieving good exposure with good short-term outcomes. Abstract Purpose The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical excision (OTE) for the management of prostatic utricle (PU) in children. Patients and methods This was a retrospective single-center study of 14 children who underwent OTE or LE for managing symptomatic PU between April 2003 and December 2014. Age, utricle size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, indwelling time of the urethral catheter, presence of residual postoperative utricular stump, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in age or utricle size between the two groups. Compared to the OTE group, the LE group experienced shorter operative times, lower estimated blood losses, and shorter hospital stays. Indwelling time of the urethral catheter was nearly 8 days in the OTE group and 6 days in the LE group. All patients had a follow-up visit between 6 months and 2 years after surgery. Two patients in the OTE group had transient UTI. Postoperative VCUG showed minimal residual utricular stump for 3 patients in the OTE group. However, no patient in either group required further operative therapy. Conclusions LE is a safe and feasible procedure for symptomatic PU in children. Compared to OTE, LE can provide minimally invasive access for achieving good exposure with good short-term outcomes. |
Author | Jia, Wei Zhang, Li-yu Liu, Guo-chang Wen, Ying-quan Fu, Wen Hu, Jin-hua Xia, Hui-min |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Wei surname: Jia fullname: Jia, Wei organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Guo-chang surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Guo-chang organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Li-yu surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Li-yu organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Ying-quan surname: Wen fullname: Wen, Ying-quan organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China – sequence: 5 givenname: Wen surname: Fu fullname: Fu, Wen organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China – sequence: 6 givenname: Jin-hua surname: Hu fullname: Hu, Jin-hua organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China – sequence: 7 givenname: Hui-min surname: Xia fullname: Xia, Hui-min email: xia-huimin@foxmail.com organization: Department of pediatric urology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, China |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNUk2LFDEQDbLizq7-haWPXnqsJP0JIsqg7sKCBxW8hXRS0bTdSZt0Dzv_3rSzg7AHVyhIKnnvpapeLsiZ8w4JuaKwpUCrV_22n1DHJXzfspRvIQUUT8iGlpzmJfD6jGwAGMt5UTXn5CLGHiAdA31GzlnNeQsN35C48-Mkg43eZd5kg0yJj8pPVmV4p2y06WKPIS4x8xO6bA7SxT1Gq-TwF2F8yOJhnGY_yjlRpyQy_9ktc7BqwMy6TP2wgw7onpOnRg4RX9yvl-Trh_dfdtf57aePN7t3t7kqi2LONWhmuooidoU0DA3WLZStbApead7oDkxDjZYdclRFWTemVWVrOAXVYlkyfkleHnVTNb8WjLMYbVQ4DNKhX6KgDSsYY3XLE_TqHrp0I2oxBTvKcBCnQSXA6yNApc5iQCOUXRv0Lg3EDoKCWH0RvTj5IlZfBKSAItGrB_TTC48S3x6JmAa1txhEVBadQm0Dqllobx-XePNAQg3Wrf79xAPG3i_BJRsEFZEJEJ_XX7N-GlpxoLz89m-B_6ngN-Q-2hk |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2024_1270819 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2021_08_004 crossref_primary_10_1111_iju_14543 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2023_03_008 crossref_primary_10_1186_s43159_020_00062_8 crossref_primary_10_12935_jvma_77_e63 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2023_0055 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_epsc_2021_101982 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2022_01_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2017_01_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2017_09_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2024_03_006 crossref_primary_10_12677_ACM_2022_125718 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2022_01_018 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42804_021_00128_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijscr_2024_110523 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58010040 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2023_09_014 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55959-5 10.1007/s00383-003-0993-6 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57627-2 10.1007/s003830050722 10.1016/0090-4295(79)90211-5 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1985.tb06356.x 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.073 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64898-5 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.00132.x 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2012.07.002 10.1007/BF01349986 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1986.tb09097.x 10.1053/jpsu.2001.23958 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2016 Elsevier Inc. Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2016 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Elsevier Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1531-5037 |
EndPage | 1601 |
ExternalDocumentID | 27339083 10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2016_06_004 S002234681630135X 1_s2_0_S002234681630135X |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .55 .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 3O- 4.4 457 4CK 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQOH AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABPPZ ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CAG COF CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HEF HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W K-O KOM L7B M29 M32 M41 MO0 N4W N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OK- OW- OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UGJ UHS UV1 WUQ X7M Z5R ZGI ~G- AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AHPSJ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR ZA5 AAYXX AGRNS CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-d0d2fb61eeb4af2efe79059a8436d38db0f81fdabe3ec4578f9c59f310c9e5523 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0022-3468 1531-5037 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 10:07:42 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:54:45 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:54:45 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:32:04 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:22:42 EST 2024 Tue Feb 25 20:01:37 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 17:13:32 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 10 |
Keywords | Laparoscopic excision Prostatic utricle Open transvesical excision |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c544t-d0d2fb61eeb4af2efe79059a8436d38db0f81fdabe3ec4578f9c59f310c9e5523 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
PMID | 27339083 |
PQID | 1824222793 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1824222793 pubmed_primary_27339083 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2016_06_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2016_06_004 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2016_06_004 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S002234681630135X elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2016_06_004 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-10-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2016 text: 2016-10-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of pediatric surgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Pediatr Surg |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Schuhrke, Kaplan (bb0010) 1978; 119 Husmann, Allen (bb0020) 1997; 157 Kass (bb0075) 1985; 2 Traxel, Minevich, Noh (bb0065) 2010; 76 Benedetto, Bagnara, Guys (bb0040) 1997; 12 Siegel, Brock, Pena (bb0030) 1995; 153 Yeung, Sihoe, Tam (bb0045) 2001; 87 Ikoma, Shima, Yabumoto (bb0055) 1985; 57 Smith, Middleton (bb0035) 1979; 14 Devine, Gonzalez-Serva, Stecker (bb0005) 1980; 123 Meisheri, Motiwale, Sawant (bb0015) 2000; 16 Willetts, Roberts, MacKinnon (bb0050) 2003; 19 Krstic, Smoljanic, Micovic (bb0025) 2001; 36 Ikoma, Shima, Yabumoto (bb0070) 1986; 58 Langer (bb0060) 2012; 21 Ikoma (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0055) 1985; 57 Traxel (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0065) 2010; 76 Siegel (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0030) 1995; 153 Benedetto (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0040) 1997; 12 Meisheri (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0015) 2000; 16 Smith (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0035) 1979; 14 Schuhrke (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0010) 1978; 119 Husmann (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0020) 1997; 157 Krstic (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0025) 2001; 36 Yeung (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0045) 2001; 87 Kass (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0075) 1985; 2 Willetts (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0050) 2003; 19 Langer (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0060) 2012; 21 Devine (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0005) 1980; 123 Ikoma (10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0070) 1986; 58 |
References_xml | – volume: 119 start-page: 765 year: 1978 end-page: 767 ident: bb0010 article-title: Prostatic utricle cysts (mullerian duct cysts) publication-title: J Urol – volume: 19 start-page: 557 year: 2003 end-page: 558 ident: bb0050 article-title: Laparoscopic excision of a prostatic utricle in a child publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int – volume: 58 start-page: 423 year: 1986 end-page: 428 ident: bb0070 article-title: Surgical treatment for enlarged prostatic utricle and vagina masculina in patients with hypospadias publication-title: Br J Urol – volume: 57 start-page: 334 year: 1985 end-page: 337 ident: bb0055 article-title: Classification of enlarged prostatic utricle in patients with hypospadias publication-title: Br J Urol – volume: 153 start-page: 785 year: 1995 end-page: 787 ident: bb0030 article-title: Transrectal posterior sagittal approach to prostatic utricle (mullerian duct cyst) publication-title: J Urol – volume: 12 start-page: 151 year: 1997 end-page: 154 ident: bb0040 article-title: A transvesical approach to mullerian duct remnants publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int – volume: 16 start-page: 199 year: 2000 end-page: 203 ident: bb0015 article-title: Surgical management of enlarged prostatic utricle publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int – volume: 123 start-page: 407 year: 1980 end-page: 411 ident: bb0005 article-title: Utricular configuration in hypospadias and intersex publication-title: J Urol – volume: 36 start-page: 870 year: 2001 end-page: 876 ident: bb0025 article-title: Surgical treatment of the mullerian duct remnants publication-title: J Pediatr Surg – volume: 2 start-page: 1274 year: 1985 ident: bb0075 article-title: Tumors: retroperitoneum: prostatic utricle cysts (mullerian duct cysts), Clinical pediatric urology – volume: 157 start-page: 1902 year: 1997 end-page: 1906 ident: bb0020 article-title: Endoscopic management of infected enlarged prostatic utricles and remnants of rectourethral fistula tracts of high imperforate anus publication-title: J Urol – volume: 87 start-page: 505 year: 2001 end-page: 508 ident: bb0045 article-title: Laparoscopic excision of prostatic utricles in children publication-title: BJU Int – volume: 76 start-page: 115 year: 2010 end-page: 120 ident: bb0065 article-title: A review: the application of minimally invasive surgery to pediatric urology: lower urinary tract reconstructive procedures publication-title: Urology – volume: 14 start-page: 44 year: 1979 end-page: 46 ident: bb0035 article-title: Surgical approach to large mullerian duct cysts publication-title: Urology – volume: 21 start-page: 283 year: 2012 end-page: 290 ident: bb0060 article-title: Laparoscopic and transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease publication-title: Semin Pediatr Surg – volume: 123 start-page: 407 issue: 3 year: 1980 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0005 article-title: Utricular configuration in hypospadias and intersex publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55959-5 – volume: 19 start-page: 557 issue: 7 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0050 article-title: Laparoscopic excision of a prostatic utricle in a child publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int doi: 10.1007/s00383-003-0993-6 – volume: 2 start-page: 1274 year: 1985 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0075 article-title: Tumors: retroperitoneum: prostatic utricle cysts (mullerian duct cysts), Clinical pediatric urology – volume: 119 start-page: 765 issue: 6 year: 1978 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0010 article-title: Prostatic utricle cysts (mullerian duct cysts) publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57627-2 – volume: 16 start-page: 199 issue: 3 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0015 article-title: Surgical management of enlarged prostatic utricle publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int doi: 10.1007/s003830050722 – volume: 14 start-page: 44 issue: 1 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0035 article-title: Surgical approach to large mullerian duct cysts publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(79)90211-5 – volume: 57 start-page: 334 issue: 3 year: 1985 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0055 article-title: Classification of enlarged prostatic utricle in patients with hypospadias publication-title: Br J Urol doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1985.tb06356.x – volume: 76 start-page: 115 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0065 article-title: A review: the application of minimally invasive surgery to pediatric urology: lower urinary tract reconstructive procedures publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.073 – volume: 157 start-page: 1902 issue: 5 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0020 article-title: Endoscopic management of infected enlarged prostatic utricles and remnants of rectourethral fistula tracts of high imperforate anus publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64898-5 – volume: 87 start-page: 505 issue: 6 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0045 article-title: Laparoscopic excision of prostatic utricles in children publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.00132.x – volume: 21 start-page: 283 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0060 article-title: Laparoscopic and transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease publication-title: Semin Pediatr Surg doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2012.07.002 – volume: 12 start-page: 151 issue: 2/3 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0040 article-title: A transvesical approach to mullerian duct remnants publication-title: Pediatr Surg Int doi: 10.1007/BF01349986 – volume: 58 start-page: 423 issue: 4 year: 1986 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0070 article-title: Surgical treatment for enlarged prostatic utricle and vagina masculina in patients with hypospadias publication-title: Br J Urol doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1986.tb09097.x – volume: 153 start-page: 785 issue: 3 Pt 1 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0030 article-title: Transrectal posterior sagittal approach to prostatic utricle (mullerian duct cyst) publication-title: J Urol – volume: 36 start-page: 870 issue: 6 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004_bb0025 article-title: Surgical treatment of the mullerian duct remnants publication-title: J Pediatr Surg doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.23958 |
SSID | ssj0003701 |
Score | 2.267641 |
Snippet | The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open transvesical... Abstract Purpose The aims of this study were to report our clinical experience with laparoscopic excision (LE) and to compare the outcomes of LE versus open... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1597 |
SubjectTerms | Child Child, Preschool Diverticulum - congenital Diverticulum - diagnosis Diverticulum - surgery Follow-Up Studies Humans Infant Laparoscopic excision Laparoscopy Length of Stay Male Open transvesical excision Operative Time Pediatrics Prostatic utricle Retrospective Studies Surgery Treatment Outcome Urethral Diseases - congenital Urethral Diseases - diagnosis Urethral Diseases - surgery Urinary Bladder - surgery Urogenital Abnormalities - diagnosis Urogenital Abnormalities - surgery Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods |
Title | Comparison of laparoscopic excision versus open transvesical excision for symptomatic prostatic utricle in children |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S002234681630135X https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S002234681630135X https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.06.004 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339083 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1824222793 |
Volume | 51 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELaqIiEuCMpreVRG4ppunDgPH6sV1ZZVe0BU7M1K7DHaVUmiJovgwm9nJnFSECCqcooTxZnIHs98ieebYexNnElwrjRBSvRfKaULihJbtnBpaURojSA28tl5uryQ79bJeo8tRi4MhVV62z_Y9N5a-ytzP5rzZrMhji-6NpnmiCgQxyRrYrDLjLT86Pt1mEechWLKGI53_8QS3h5tG7Dt7uoThXilfR5PX7DtDw7qbwC0d0QnD9h9jyD58fCSD9keVAfs7pnfI3_E2sVUWpDXjl-iN6SMlXWzMRy-DhV1OAVj7FpOtbN4R-7qC_TTdX0HglnefvvcdHWf1JU3RA_pW5S_HyXzTcVHKvhjdnHy9sNiGfjSCoFJpOwCG9rIlakAKGXhInBAibpUkcs4tXFuy9DlwtmihBiMxFXtlEmUQyxoFCT48fqE7Vd1Bc8YN0UGkTK5AJlKEPg4G9vIZCZWwqjczVgyjqc2Pu84lb-41GOA2VaP86BpHnQfaSdnbD71a4bMG__skY3TpUdeKVpCjc7hdj2h9Qu61UK3kQ71b0o3Y2rq-Yve3kjq61GnNC5q2qkpKqh3KC2P6Ncc2s4Zezoo2zQGiDdjhcD5-X9IfsHu0dkQlPiS7XdXO3iF4KorD_vVc8juHJ-ulud0XL3_uPoB9DsrHg |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB6VIgEXxJvlaSSu6caJ8_ARragW6PbUSnuzEnuMdtUmUZNF7YXfzjhxUhAgENysxBNHnteXeB4Ab-NMoLWlDlKX_iuEsEFR0sgUNi01D43mLht5dZwuT8XHdbLeg8WYC-PCKr3tH2x6b639lbnfzXmz2bgcX3JtIs0JURCOSdY34KYg9XVtDA6-Xsd5xFnIp5LhNP27NOHtwbZB0-4uPrsYr7Qv5Ok7tv3CQ_0Ogfae6PAe3PUQkr0b3vI-7GH1AG6t_CH5Q2gXU29BVlt2Ru7Qlaysm41meDm01GEuGmPXMtc8i3XOX33Bnl_XMwjNsvbqvOnqvqora1x-SD9yBfxpZbap2JgL_ghOD9-fLJaB760Q6ESILjChiWyZcsRSFDZCi65SlyxyEacmzk0Z2pxbU5QYoxak1lbqRFoCg1piQl-vj2G_qit8CkwXGUZS5xxFKpDT40xsIp3pWHItczuDZNxPpX3hcdf_4kyNEWZbNfJBOT6oPtROzGA-0TVD6Y0_UmQju9SYWEqmUJF3-DdKbL1Gt4qrNlKh-knqZiAnyh8E969WfTPKlCKtdkc1RYX1jlbLI_dvjoznDJ4MwjbtAQHOWBJyfvYfK7-G28uT1ZE6-nD86TnccXeGCMUXsN9d7PAlIa2ufNVr0jcpNisJ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+laparoscopic+excision+versus+open+transvesical+excision+for+symptomatic+prostatic+utricle+in+children&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+pediatric+surgery&rft.au=Jia%2C+Wei&rft.au=Liu%2C+Guo-chang&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Li-yu&rft.au=Wen%2C+Ying-quan&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0022-3468&rft.eissn=1531-5037&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1597&rft.epage=1601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jpedsurg.2016.06.004&rft.externalDocID=S002234681630135X |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00223468%2FS0022346816X00103%2Fcov150h.gif |