Impact of renal function on eligibility for chemotherapy and survival in patients who have undergone radical nephro‐ureterectomy

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high‐risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBJU international Vol. 112; no. 4; pp. 453 - 461
Main Authors Xylinas, Evanguelos, Rink, Michael, Margulis, Vitaly, Clozel, Thomas, Lee, Richard K., Comploj, Evi, Novara, Giacomo, Raman, Jay D., Lotan, Yair, Weizer, Alon, Roupret, Morgan, Pycha, Armin, Scherr, Douglas S., Seitz, Christian, Ficarra, Vincenzo, Trinh, Quoc‐Dien, Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Montorsi, Francesco, Zerbib, Marc, Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Wiley-Blackwell 01.08.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1464-4096
1464-410X
1464-410X
DOI10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11649.x

Cover

Loading…
Abstract What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high‐risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and results in decreased overall survival in various malignancies. The study shows that only a small proportion of patients had a preoperative renal function that would allow cisplatin‐based chemotherapy. Moreover, eGFR significantly decreased after RNU, thereby lowering the rate of cisplatin eligibility to only 16 and 52% of patients based on the thresholds of 60 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Taken together with the rest of the literature, the findings of the study support the use of cisplatin‐based chemotherapy, when indicated, in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting. Objective To report (i) the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in patients undergoing radical nephro‐ureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); (ii) the rate of change in eGFR in patients eligible for cisplatin‐based chemotherapy; and (iii) the association of preoperative, postoperative and rate of change of renal function variables with survival outcomes. Patient and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 666 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at seven international institutions from 1994 to 2007. The eGFR was calculated at baseline and at 3–6 months (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD‐EP) equations). Results The median (interquartile range) eGFR decreased by 18.2 (8–12)% after RNU. A total of 37% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, which decreased to 16% after RNU (P < 0.001); 72% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, which decreased to 52% after RNU (P < 0.001). The distributions were similar when analyses were restricted to patients with locally advanced disease (pT3–pT4) and/or lymph node metastasis. Patients older than the median age of 70 years were more likely to have a decrease in eGFR after RNU (P < 0.001). None of the renal function variables was associated with clinical outcomes such as disease recurrence, cancer‐specific and overall mortality; however, when analyses were restricted to patients who had no adjuvant chemotherapy and did not experience disease recurrence (n = 431), a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.03) and a postoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival in univariable analyses. Conclusions In patients who had UTUC, eGFR was low and furthermore, it significantly decreased after RNU. Renal function did not affect cancer‐specific outcomes after RNU.
AbstractList What's known on the subject? and what does the study add?: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and results in decreased overall survival in various malignancies. The study shows that only a small proportion of patients had a preoperative renal function that would allow cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Moreover, eGFR significantly decreased after RNU, thereby lowering the rate of cisplatin eligibility to only 16 and 52% of patients based on the thresholds of 60 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , respectively. Taken together with the rest of the literature, the findings of the study support the use of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, when indicated, in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting. To report (i) the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in patients undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); (ii) the rate of change in eGFR in patients eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy; and (iii) the association of preoperative, postoperative and rate of change of renal function variables with survival outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 666 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at seven international institutions from 1994 to 2007. The eGFR was calculated at baseline and at 3-6 months (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EP) equations). The median (interquartile range) eGFR decreased by 18.2 (8-12)% after RNU. A total of 37% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , which decreased to 16% after RNU (P < 0.001); 72% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , which decreased to 52% after RNU (P < 0.001). The distributions were similar when analyses were restricted to patients with locally advanced disease (pT3-pT4) and/or lymph node metastasis. Patients older than the median age of 70 years were more likely to have a decrease in eGFR after RNU (P < 0.001). None of the renal function variables was associated with clinical outcomes such as disease recurrence, cancer-specific and overall mortality; however, when analyses were restricted to patients who had no adjuvant chemotherapy and did not experience disease recurrence (n = 431), a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.03) and a postoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival in univariable analyses. In patients who had UTUC, eGFR was low and furthermore, it significantly decreased after RNU. Renal function did not affect cancer-specific outcomes after RNU.
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and results in decreased overall survival in various malignancies. The study shows that only a small proportion of patients had a preoperative renal function that would allow cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Moreover, eGFR significantly decreased after RNU, thereby lowering the rate of cisplatin eligibility to only 16 and 52% of patients based on the thresholds of 60 and 45mL/min/1.73m2, respectively. Taken together with the rest of the literature, the findings of the study support the use of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, when indicated, in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting. Objective To report (i) the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in patients undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); (ii) the rate of change in eGFR in patients eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy; and (iii) the association of preoperative, postoperative and rate of change of renal function variables with survival outcomes. Patient and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 666 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at seven international institutions from 1994 to 2007. The eGFR was calculated at baseline and at 3-6 months (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EP) equations). Results The median (interquartile range) eGFR decreased by 18.2 (8-12)% after RNU. A total of 37% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60mL/min/1.73m2, which decreased to 16% after RNU (P < 0.001); 72% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 45mL/min/1.73m2, which decreased to 52% after RNU (P < 0.001). The distributions were similar when analyses were restricted to patients with locally advanced disease (pT3-pT4) and/or lymph node metastasis. Patients older than the median age of 70 years were more likely to have a decrease in eGFR after RNU (P < 0.001). None of the renal function variables was associated with clinical outcomes such as disease recurrence, cancer-specific and overall mortality; however, when analyses were restricted to patients who had no adjuvant chemotherapy and did not experience disease recurrence (n = 431), a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60mL/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.03) and a postoperative eGFR ≥ 45mL/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival in univariable analyses. Conclusions In patients who had UTUC, eGFR was low and furthermore, it significantly decreased after RNU. Renal function did not affect cancer-specific outcomes after RNU.
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high‐risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and results in decreased overall survival in various malignancies. The study shows that only a small proportion of patients had a preoperative renal function that would allow cisplatin‐based chemotherapy. Moreover, eGFR significantly decreased after RNU, thereby lowering the rate of cisplatin eligibility to only 16 and 52% of patients based on the thresholds of 60 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Taken together with the rest of the literature, the findings of the study support the use of cisplatin‐based chemotherapy, when indicated, in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting. Objective To report (i) the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in patients undergoing radical nephro‐ureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); (ii) the rate of change in eGFR in patients eligible for cisplatin‐based chemotherapy; and (iii) the association of preoperative, postoperative and rate of change of renal function variables with survival outcomes. Patient and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 666 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at seven international institutions from 1994 to 2007. The eGFR was calculated at baseline and at 3–6 months (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD‐EP) equations). Results The median (interquartile range) eGFR decreased by 18.2 (8–12)% after RNU. A total of 37% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, which decreased to 16% after RNU (P < 0.001); 72% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, which decreased to 52% after RNU (P < 0.001). The distributions were similar when analyses were restricted to patients with locally advanced disease (pT3–pT4) and/or lymph node metastasis. Patients older than the median age of 70 years were more likely to have a decrease in eGFR after RNU (P < 0.001). None of the renal function variables was associated with clinical outcomes such as disease recurrence, cancer‐specific and overall mortality; however, when analyses were restricted to patients who had no adjuvant chemotherapy and did not experience disease recurrence (n = 431), a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.03) and a postoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival in univariable analyses. Conclusions In patients who had UTUC, eGFR was low and furthermore, it significantly decreased after RNU. Renal function did not affect cancer‐specific outcomes after RNU.
What's known on the subject? and what does the study add?: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and results in decreased overall survival in various malignancies. The study shows that only a small proportion of patients had a preoperative renal function that would allow cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Moreover, eGFR significantly decreased after RNU, thereby lowering the rate of cisplatin eligibility to only 16 and 52% of patients based on the thresholds of 60 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , respectively. Taken together with the rest of the literature, the findings of the study support the use of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, when indicated, in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting.UNLABELLEDWhat's known on the subject? and what does the study add?: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and results in decreased overall survival in various malignancies. The study shows that only a small proportion of patients had a preoperative renal function that would allow cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Moreover, eGFR significantly decreased after RNU, thereby lowering the rate of cisplatin eligibility to only 16 and 52% of patients based on the thresholds of 60 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , respectively. Taken together with the rest of the literature, the findings of the study support the use of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, when indicated, in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting.To report (i) the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in patients undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); (ii) the rate of change in eGFR in patients eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy; and (iii) the association of preoperative, postoperative and rate of change of renal function variables with survival outcomes.OBJECTIVETo report (i) the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in patients undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); (ii) the rate of change in eGFR in patients eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy; and (iii) the association of preoperative, postoperative and rate of change of renal function variables with survival outcomes.We performed a retrospective analysis of 666 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at seven international institutions from 1994 to 2007. The eGFR was calculated at baseline and at 3-6 months (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EP) equations).PATIENT AND METHODSWe performed a retrospective analysis of 666 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at seven international institutions from 1994 to 2007. The eGFR was calculated at baseline and at 3-6 months (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EP) equations).The median (interquartile range) eGFR decreased by 18.2 (8-12)% after RNU. A total of 37% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , which decreased to 16% after RNU (P < 0.001); 72% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , which decreased to 52% after RNU (P < 0.001). The distributions were similar when analyses were restricted to patients with locally advanced disease (pT3-pT4) and/or lymph node metastasis. Patients older than the median age of 70 years were more likely to have a decrease in eGFR after RNU (P < 0.001). None of the renal function variables was associated with clinical outcomes such as disease recurrence, cancer-specific and overall mortality; however, when analyses were restricted to patients who had no adjuvant chemotherapy and did not experience disease recurrence (n = 431), a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.03) and a postoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival in univariable analyses.RESULTSThe median (interquartile range) eGFR decreased by 18.2 (8-12)% after RNU. A total of 37% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , which decreased to 16% after RNU (P < 0.001); 72% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , which decreased to 52% after RNU (P < 0.001). The distributions were similar when analyses were restricted to patients with locally advanced disease (pT3-pT4) and/or lymph node metastasis. Patients older than the median age of 70 years were more likely to have a decrease in eGFR after RNU (P < 0.001). None of the renal function variables was associated with clinical outcomes such as disease recurrence, cancer-specific and overall mortality; however, when analyses were restricted to patients who had no adjuvant chemotherapy and did not experience disease recurrence (n = 431), a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.03) and a postoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival in univariable analyses.In patients who had UTUC, eGFR was low and furthermore, it significantly decreased after RNU. Renal function did not affect cancer-specific outcomes after RNU.CONCLUSIONSIn patients who had UTUC, eGFR was low and furthermore, it significantly decreased after RNU. Renal function did not affect cancer-specific outcomes after RNU.
Author Weizer, Alon
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Comploj, Evi
Pycha, Armin
Lotan, Yair
Novara, Giacomo
Ficarra, Vincenzo
Xylinas, Evanguelos
Scherr, Douglas S.
Trinh, Quoc‐Dien
Margulis, Vitaly
Montorsi, Francesco
Lee, Richard K.
Seitz, Christian
Roupret, Morgan
Raman, Jay D.
Rink, Michael
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Clozel, Thomas
Zerbib, Marc
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Evanguelos
  surname: Xylinas
  fullname: Xylinas, Evanguelos
  organization: Paris Descartes University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Rink
  fullname: Rink, Michael
  organization: University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Vitaly
  surname: Margulis
  fullname: Margulis, Vitaly
  organization: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Thomas
  surname: Clozel
  fullname: Clozel, Thomas
  organization: New York‐Presbyterian Hospital
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Richard K.
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Richard K.
  organization: New York‐Presbyterian Hospital
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Evi
  surname: Comploj
  fullname: Comploj, Evi
  organization: General Hospital of Bolzano
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Giacomo
  surname: Novara
  fullname: Novara, Giacomo
  organization: University of Padua
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Jay D.
  surname: Raman
  fullname: Raman, Jay D.
  organization: Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Yair
  surname: Lotan
  fullname: Lotan, Yair
  organization: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Alon
  surname: Weizer
  fullname: Weizer, Alon
  organization: University of Michigan
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Morgan
  surname: Roupret
  fullname: Roupret, Morgan
  organization: Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Armin
  surname: Pycha
  fullname: Pycha, Armin
  organization: General Hospital of Bolzano
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Douglas S.
  surname: Scherr
  fullname: Scherr, Douglas S.
  organization: New York‐Presbyterian Hospital
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Christian
  surname: Seitz
  fullname: Seitz, Christian
  organization: Teaching Hospital of the Medical University of Vienna
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Vincenzo
  surname: Ficarra
  fullname: Ficarra, Vincenzo
  organization: University of Padua
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Quoc‐Dien
  surname: Trinh
  fullname: Trinh, Quoc‐Dien
  organization: University of Montreal
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Pierre I.
  surname: Karakiewicz
  fullname: Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
  organization: University of Montreal
– sequence: 18
  givenname: Francesco
  surname: Montorsi
  fullname: Montorsi, Francesco
  organization: Vita‐Salute University
– sequence: 19
  givenname: Marc
  surname: Zerbib
  fullname: Zerbib, Marc
  organization: Paris Descartes University
– sequence: 20
  givenname: Shahrokh F.
  surname: Shariat
  fullname: Shariat, Shahrokh F.
  organization: New York‐Presbyterian Hospital
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27553185$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23464979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkc1q3DAQx01JaT7aVyiCUuhlt5JsyfGl0IR-pAR6aaA3IUujWIstuZK8iW-lT9Bn7JNUTnZbyClCoGHmNzOa-R8XB847KApE8Jrk83azJhWvVhXB39cUE5q9vGrWt0-Ko3-Bg72NG35YHMe4wTg7OHtWHNIyR5q6OSp-XQyjVAl5gwI42SMzOZWsdyhf6O21bW1v04yMD0h1MPjUQZDjjKTTKE5ha7c5yzo0ymTBpYhuOo86uQU0OQ3hOv8cBamtypiDsQv-z8_fU4AEAVTyw_y8eGpkH-HF7j0prj5--Hb-eXX59dPF-fvLlWJV1ay4JIbWWlalBkMZ5RIDaWsKbV0xygiTmNR5vlaVimqmGwOacKxrQphhGJcnxZv7umPwPyaISQw2Kuh76cBPUZCKUMZqTpuMvnqAbvwU8noyVbOSNoTzhXq5o6Z2AC3GYAcZZrHfbgZe7wAZ8_gmSKds_M_VjJXklGXu3T2ngo8xgBHKJrmokIK0vSBYLLKLjVgUFYu6YpFd3MkubnOB0wcF9j0ekbrrfWN7mB-dJ86-XN2Z5V_wX8bm
CODEN BJINFO
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_20554
crossref_primary_10_1586_14737140_2014_882774
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2016_08_008
crossref_primary_10_1002_bco2_81
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2024_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2022_06_014
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_023_04300_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2016_11_019
crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_529186
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_purol_2022_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2021_01_014
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajco_12856
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14194841
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_023_04330_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2018_01_005
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15184585
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2020_08_015
crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_12597
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00120_018_0830_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2017_03_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2017_07_012
crossref_primary_10_1080_14656566_2022_2150966
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2013_09_031
crossref_primary_10_1093_jjco_hyab081
crossref_primary_10_1093_jjco_hyv136
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2015_03_006
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_969106
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2020_04_043
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737140_2019_1698295
crossref_primary_10_1200_EDBK_237451
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_015_1566_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2016_07_015
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_872273
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2020_04_025
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_017_1150_x
crossref_primary_10_22141_2663_3272_4_2_2021_238667
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_016_1871_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_14020
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24087486
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000806
crossref_primary_10_3892_mco_2024_2735
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2022_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000895
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_024_02468_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00092_019_2060_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2024_102203
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2021_03_003
crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMoa2034442
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2016_07_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2021_03_008
crossref_primary_10_1097_CAD_0000000000001200
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fjurol_2024_102722
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics13051004
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000148
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_87573_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2018_04_012
crossref_primary_10_4103_UROS_UROS_54_22
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_020_03479_3
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2015_0822
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urols_2015_05_001
crossref_primary_10_1093_jjco_hyaa256
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1166_7087_20_30750_8
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_2988
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_019_08128_7
crossref_primary_10_1093_jjco_hyv180
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms22168761
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2013_12_008
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_016_1995_z
crossref_primary_10_3390_genes12030333
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000832
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2016_04_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2014_10_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2016_10_022
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12894_023_01265_y
crossref_primary_10_1111_iju_13855
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines11071775
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_022_03429_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_critrevonc_2019_01_019
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_61479
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000020184
crossref_primary_10_3346_jkms_2017_32_2_335
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_21551
crossref_primary_10_1111_iju_15192
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10184155
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_024_05267_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_014_1311_8
crossref_primary_10_15406_unoaj_2014_01_00002
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2021_723669
crossref_primary_10_4103_HUAJ_HUAJ_8_20
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737140_2018_1481395
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2024_04_012
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12894_024_01627_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_020_01650_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2024_01_005
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15092414
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2017_05_009
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0129268
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fpurol_2024_07_206
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2019_06_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e22408
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_54232_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2013_09_010
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_9753
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11864_019_0637_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13578_023_01061_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2022_11_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2021_05_037
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0171701
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2021_05_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_017_2139_9
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000001276
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.042
10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.035
10.1002/cncr.26172
10.1002/cncr.25043
10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.021
10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.017
10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.049
10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.020
10.1002/cncr.25050
10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.039
10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.011
10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.077
10.1007/978-1-4757-3656-4
10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006
10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002
10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.053
10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.029
10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.055
10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.07.054
10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.029
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08003.x
10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.002
10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.104
10.1002/cncr.24135
10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.005
10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.006
10.1097/00000478-199812000-00001
10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013
10.1038/nrurol.2011.96
10.1016/j.urology.2011.01.002
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 BJU International
2014 INIST-CNRS
2013 BJU International.
BJUI © 2013 BJU International
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 BJU International
– notice: 2014 INIST-CNRS
– notice: 2013 BJU International.
– notice: BJUI © 2013 BJU International
CorporateAuthor UTUC Collaboration
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: UTUC Collaboration
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7X8
DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11649.x
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1464-410X
EndPage 461
ExternalDocumentID 3911931271
23464979
27553185
10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11649_x
BJU11649
Genre article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.55
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
23N
24P
2WC
31~
33P
36B
3O-
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
6P2
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABOCM
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BAWUL
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DIK
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
J5H
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
X7M
XG1
YFH
ZGI
ZXP
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGYGG
CITATION
IQODW
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5449-6a1f27da43def2526a0e1b72eb7452515a017466bc3c2d5d9fed160d7115f5003
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1464-4096
1464-410X
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 16:06:06 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 14 07:08:28 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:49:44 EDT 2025
Wed Apr 02 07:15:04 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:50:01 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:09 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:51:44 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Antineoplastic agent
Human
Nephrology
Urinary system disease
Renal function
Prognosis
Nephroureterectomy
upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Urinary tract disease
Malignant tumor
Upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma
Survival
Cisplatin
Urology
Glomerular filtration rate
Alkylating agent
Chemotherapy
Treatment
Surgery
radical nephroureterectomy
Cancer
Platinum II Complexes
renal function
chemotherapy
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
2013 BJU International.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5449-6a1f27da43def2526a0e1b72eb7452515a017466bc3c2d5d9fed160d7115f5003
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11649.x
PMID 23464979
PQID 1753291669
PQPubID 1026371
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1412557629
proquest_journals_1753291669
pubmed_primary_23464979
pascalfrancis_primary_27553185
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11649_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11649_x
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11649_x_BJU11649
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate August 2013
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2013
  text: August 2013
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Oxford
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford
– name: England
– name: Edgecliff
PublicationTitle BJU international
PublicationTitleAlternate BJU Int
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley-Blackwell
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2012; 61
2010; 76
2010; 58
2011; 117
2010; 57
2009; 53
2006; 68
2009; 181
2010; 116
2009; 182
2011; 60
1999; 130
2009; 150
2010; 184
2011; 78
2011; 59
2008; 179
2002
2007; 52
2005; 48
2009; 103
2011; 8
2009; 115
1998; 22
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_26_1
e_1_2_7_27_1
e_1_2_7_28_1
e_1_2_7_29_1
e_1_2_7_30_1
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_31_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_21_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
References_xml – volume: 181
  start-page: 2482
  year: 2009
  end-page: 2489
  article-title: Impact of lymph node dissection on cancer specific survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 116
  start-page: 3127
  year: 2010
  end-page: 3134
  article-title: Incidence of downstaging and complete remission after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high‐risk upper tract transitional cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 76
  start-page: 895
  year: 2010
  end-page: 901
  article-title: Troubling outcomes from population‐level analysis of surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
  publication-title: Urology
– volume: 59
  start-page: 584
  year: 2011
  end-page: 594
  article-title: European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas: 2011 update
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 48
  start-page: 202
  year: 2005
  end-page: 205
  article-title: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: update of a systematic review and meta‐analysis of individual patient data advanced bladder cancer (ABC) meta‐analysis collaboration
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 116
  start-page: 2967
  year: 2010
  end-page: 2973
  article-title: Chronic kidney disease after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma and implications for the administration of perioperative chemotherapy
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 58
  start-page: 581
  year: 2010
  end-page: 587
  article-title: Changes in renal function following nephroureterectomy may affect the use of perioperative chemotherapy
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 52
  start-page: 148
  year: 2007
  end-page: 154
  article-title: Morbidity and clinical outcome of nephron‐sparing surgery in relation to tumour size and indication
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 182
  start-page: 900
  year: 2009
  end-page: 906
  article-title: Adjuvant chemotherapy for high risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 57
  start-page: 1064
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1071
  article-title: Prognostic role of lymphovascular invasion in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: an international validation study
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 103
  start-page: 307
  year: 2009
  end-page: 311
  article-title: Tumour architecture is an independent predictor of outcomes after nephroureterectomy: a multi‐institutional analysis of 1363 patients
  publication-title: BJU Int
– volume: 130
  start-page: 461
  year: 1999
  end-page: 470
  article-title: A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– volume: 48
  start-page: 189
  year: 2005
  end-page: 199
  article-title: Adjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of individual patient data advanced bladder cancer (ABC) meta‐analysis collaboration
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 61
  start-page: 245
  year: 2012
  end-page: 253
  article-title: The impact of tumor multifocality on outcomes in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 57
  start-page: 575
  year: 2010
  end-page: 581
  article-title: Tumour necrosis is an indicator of aggressive biology in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 60
  start-page: 1258
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1265
  article-title: Ureteral and multifocal tumours have worse prognosis than renal pelvic tumours in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract treated by nephroureterectomy
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 115
  start-page: 1224
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1233
  article-title: Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 150
  start-page: 604
  year: 2009
  end-page: 612
  article-title: A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– volume: 68
  start-page: 53
  year: 2006
  end-page: 57
  article-title: Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract
  publication-title: Urology
– volume: 117
  start-page: 5500
  year: 2011
  end-page: 5508
  article-title: Outcomes after adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of high‐risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT‐UC): results from a large multicenter collaborative study
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 8
  start-page: 440
  year: 2011
  end-page: 447
  article-title: Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
  publication-title: Nat Rev Urol
– volume: 59
  start-page: 543
  year: 2011
  end-page: 552
  article-title: A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron‐sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low‐stage renal cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 179
  start-page: 468
  year: 2008
  end-page: 471
  article-title: Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy
  publication-title: J Urol
– year: 2002
– volume: 184
  start-page: 1867
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1871
  article-title: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration versus Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations for renal function evaluation in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 78
  start-page: 61
  year: 2011
  end-page: 67
  article-title: Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy and regional lymphadenectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  publication-title: Urology
– volume: 53
  start-page: 46
  year: 2009
  end-page: 55
  article-title: CKD surveillance using laboratory data from the population‐based National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
  publication-title: Am J Kidney Dis
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1435
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1448
  article-title: The World Health Organization / International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee
  publication-title: Am J Surg Pathol
– volume: 61
  start-page: 854
  year: 2012
  end-page: 855
  article-title: Death Certificates Are Valid for the Determination of Cause of Death in Patients With Upper and Lower Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 57
  start-page: 1072
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1079
  article-title: Impact of tumor location on prognosis for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma managed by radical nephroureterectomy
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.042
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.035
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.26172
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.25043
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.021
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.017
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.049
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.020
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.25050
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.039
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.011
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.077
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3656-4
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.053
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.029
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.055
– ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
  doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.07.054
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.029
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08003.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.002
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.104
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.24135
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.005
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.006
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1097/00000478-199812000-00001
– ident: e_1_2_7_31_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
  doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.96
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.01.002
SSID ssj0014665
Score 2.451816
Snippet What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high‐risk urothelial carcinoma...
What's known on the subject? and what does the study add?: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high-risk urothelial carcinoma...
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high-risk urothelial carcinoma...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 453
SubjectTerms Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - mortality
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - physiopathology
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery
Chemotherapy
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Kidney Function Tests
Kidney Neoplasms - drug therapy
Kidney Neoplasms - mortality
Kidney Neoplasms - physiopathology
Kidney Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Mortality
Nephrectomy - methods
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Patient Selection
radical nephroureterectomy
renal function
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the urinary system
Survival Rate
Tumors of the urinary system
upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Ureter - surgery
Urinary tract. Prostate gland
Title Impact of renal function on eligibility for chemotherapy and survival in patients who have undergone radical nephro‐ureterectomy
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2012.11649.x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23464979
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1753291669
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1412557629
Volume 112
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3BbtQwELVQDwipopQWutBWRuKa1cZrx_UREFVbqRwQK-3NsmO7RaVJlWwKywnxBXwjX8KMk02VqocKVcphlXiysTMzfo7fzBDy1vjJNDgbEpGGPOE2E4nhsEqRjisWVMCakMi2-JQdzfjJXMw7_hPGwrT5IfoPbmgZ0V-jgRtb3zZynvB0MkeGFoPzGVdjxJNI3UJ89LnPJAVNY1XJVgRg-5DUc-eNBjPV-pWpYdBCW-3iLjg6RLdxejrcIBerjrWslItxs7Dj_OetnI8P0_Nn5GmHYum7Vu02ySNfPCePT7t9-i3y-zgGX9Iy0MpjS5w-UQUoHJEEHTm5SwqQmYLaXHZxYEtqCkfrBvwXWAD9WtAu72tNv5-X9Nxce4pRb9VZWXhambjJRAsPGln-_fWnqZDcg_sQl8ttMjv8-OXDUdJVe0hywblKMpMGJp3hU-cDEywzE59aybyVuPeaCgPOA16jzac5c8Kp4F2aTZwETBsEOKcXZK2AP98h1PJMMKcOFKA3zliwQnGV4xdPDjO2OBgRuXqzOu9SoWNFjm96sCTiGodY4xDrOMT6x4ikveRVmw7kHjL7A-XpBZkUAoPXR2R3pU268yC1xgyqDLB7pkbkTX8ZbB83dEzhywbacOggLBgZtHnZauHNzafwMErCFRl16d6Pq9-fzOLPV_8t-Zo8YbFqCPIkd8naomr8HmC3hd2PVvkPTPE1iw
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQkQAJ8S4slGIkrlltvHZcH3lV29L2gLrS3iw7tilqm1TZDbA9VfwCfiO_hBknG5Sqhwoh5RAlniR2ZsafPS9C3hg_GgdnQyLSkCfcZiIxHFYp0nHFggpYExK9LQ6yyZTvzsSsLQeEsTBNfohuww0lI-prFHDckL4s5Tzh6WiGLloMrmdcDQFQ3sQC31jO4MPnLpcUtI11JRsaAO59t54rn9Sbq-6emTkMW2jqXVwFSPv4Nk5Q2_fJyaprjV_K8bBe2GF-finr43_q-wNyrwWy9G3DeQ_JDV88Irf2W1P9Y_JzJ8Zf0jLQymNLnEGRCygc0Q86uuUuKaBmCpxz2oaCLakpHJ3XoMJACOjXgrapX-f0-1FJj8w3TzHwrfpSFp5WJtqZaOGBKcvfF7_qCv170BRxunxCptsfD99PkrbgQ5ILzlWSmTQw6QwfOx-YYJkZ-dRK5q1E82sqDOgP-I82H-fMCaeCd2k2chJgbRCgn9bJWgEvf0aoBRZgTm0pAHCcsWCF4irHTU8Ok7bYGhC5-rU6b7OhY1GOE91bFXGNQ6xxiHUcYv1jQNKO8qzJCHINms0e93SETAqB8esDsrFiJ90qkbnGJKoM4HumBuR1dxvEH206pvBlDW04dBDWjAzaPG3Y8O_Dx_AxSsIdGZnp2p-r3-1O4-nzf6Z8RW5PDvf39N7OwacX5A6LRUTQbXKDrC2q2r8EKLewm1FE_wCY2zml
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQkSokxJuyUIqRuGa18dpxfSyPVVugQoiV9mbZsU1R22SV3QDbE-IX8Bv5Jcw42aBUPVQIKYco9iSxMzP-nHkR8sL40Tg4GxKRhjzhNhOJ4bBLkY4rFlTAmpDobXGU7U_54UzMWv8njIVp8kN0P9xQMqK-RgGfu3BRyHnC09EMPbQYXM-4GgKevM4zkB0ESB-7VFLQN5aVbGgAt_e9ei69U2-pujk3C5i10JS7uAyP9uFtXJ8mt8nJemSNW8rJsF7aYX5-Ienj_xn6HXKrhbF0r-G7u-SaL-6Rzfetof4--XkQoy9pGWjlsSeun8gDFI7oBR2dclcUMDMFvjlrA8FW1BSOLmpQYCAC9EtB28SvC_rtuKTH5qunGPZWfS4LTysTrUy08MCS5e8fv-oKvXvQEHG2ekCmkzefXu0nbbmHJBecqyQzaWDSGT52PjDBMjPyqZXMW4nG11QY0B7wGW0-zpkTTgXv0mzkJIDaIEA7PSQbBTz8EaGWZ4I5tasAvnHGghWKqxx_eXJYssXugMj1l9V5mwsdS3Kc6t6eiGucYo1TrOMU6-8DknaU8yYfyBVodnrM0xEyKQRGrw_I9pqbdKtCFhpTqDIA75kakOddMwg_WnRM4csa-nAYIOwYGfTZarjw783H8DJKQouMvHTl19UvD6fx9PE_Uz4jmx9eT_S7g6O3T8gNFiuIoM_kNtlYVrV_CjhuaXeigP4BzeA4XQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact+of+renal+function+on+eligibility+for+chemotherapy+and+survival+in+patients+who+have+undergone+radical+nephro%E2%80%90ureterectomy&rft.jtitle=BJU+international&rft.au=Xylinas%2C+Evanguelos&rft.au=Rink%2C+Michael&rft.au=Margulis%2C+Vitaly&rft.au=Clozel%2C+Thomas&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=461&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2012.11649.x&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11649_x
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1464-4096&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1464-4096&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1464-4096&client=summon