Impact of renal function on eligibility for chemotherapy and survival in patients who have undergone radical nephro‐ureterectomy
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high‐risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and...
Saved in:
Published in | BJU international Vol. 112; no. 4; pp. 453 - 461 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Wiley-Blackwell
01.08.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1464-4096 1464-410X 1464-410X |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11649.x |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | What's known on the subject? and What does the study add?
Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high‐risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and results in decreased overall survival in various malignancies.
The study shows that only a small proportion of patients had a preoperative renal function that would allow cisplatin‐based chemotherapy. Moreover, eGFR significantly decreased after RNU, thereby lowering the rate of cisplatin eligibility to only 16 and 52% of patients based on the thresholds of 60 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Taken together with the rest of the literature, the findings of the study support the use of cisplatin‐based chemotherapy, when indicated, in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting.
Objective
To report (i) the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in patients undergoing radical nephro‐ureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); (ii) the rate of change in eGFR in patients eligible for cisplatin‐based chemotherapy; and (iii) the association of preoperative, postoperative and rate of change of renal function variables with survival outcomes.
Patient and Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 666 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at seven international institutions from 1994 to 2007.
The eGFR was calculated at baseline and at 3–6 months (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD‐EP) equations).
Results
The median (interquartile range) eGFR decreased by 18.2 (8–12)% after RNU. A total of 37% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, which decreased to 16% after RNU (P < 0.001); 72% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, which decreased to 52% after RNU (P < 0.001). The distributions were similar when analyses were restricted to patients with locally advanced disease (pT3–pT4) and/or lymph node metastasis. Patients older than the median age of 70 years were more likely to have a decrease in eGFR after RNU (P < 0.001).
None of the renal function variables was associated with clinical outcomes such as disease recurrence, cancer‐specific and overall mortality; however, when analyses were restricted to patients who had no adjuvant chemotherapy and did not experience disease recurrence (n = 431), a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.03) and a postoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival in univariable analyses.
Conclusions
In patients who had UTUC, eGFR was low and furthermore, it significantly decreased after RNU. Renal function did not affect cancer‐specific outcomes after RNU. |
---|---|
AbstractList | What's known on the subject? and what does the study add?: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and results in decreased overall survival in various malignancies. The study shows that only a small proportion of patients had a preoperative renal function that would allow cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Moreover, eGFR significantly decreased after RNU, thereby lowering the rate of cisplatin eligibility to only 16 and 52% of patients based on the thresholds of 60 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , respectively. Taken together with the rest of the literature, the findings of the study support the use of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, when indicated, in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting.
To report (i) the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in patients undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); (ii) the rate of change in eGFR in patients eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy; and (iii) the association of preoperative, postoperative and rate of change of renal function variables with survival outcomes.
We performed a retrospective analysis of 666 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at seven international institutions from 1994 to 2007. The eGFR was calculated at baseline and at 3-6 months (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EP) equations).
The median (interquartile range) eGFR decreased by 18.2 (8-12)% after RNU. A total of 37% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , which decreased to 16% after RNU (P < 0.001); 72% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , which decreased to 52% after RNU (P < 0.001). The distributions were similar when analyses were restricted to patients with locally advanced disease (pT3-pT4) and/or lymph node metastasis. Patients older than the median age of 70 years were more likely to have a decrease in eGFR after RNU (P < 0.001). None of the renal function variables was associated with clinical outcomes such as disease recurrence, cancer-specific and overall mortality; however, when analyses were restricted to patients who had no adjuvant chemotherapy and did not experience disease recurrence (n = 431), a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.03) and a postoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival in univariable analyses.
In patients who had UTUC, eGFR was low and furthermore, it significantly decreased after RNU. Renal function did not affect cancer-specific outcomes after RNU. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and results in decreased overall survival in various malignancies. The study shows that only a small proportion of patients had a preoperative renal function that would allow cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Moreover, eGFR significantly decreased after RNU, thereby lowering the rate of cisplatin eligibility to only 16 and 52% of patients based on the thresholds of 60 and 45mL/min/1.73m2, respectively. Taken together with the rest of the literature, the findings of the study support the use of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, when indicated, in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting. Objective To report (i) the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in patients undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); (ii) the rate of change in eGFR in patients eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy; and (iii) the association of preoperative, postoperative and rate of change of renal function variables with survival outcomes. Patient and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 666 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at seven international institutions from 1994 to 2007. The eGFR was calculated at baseline and at 3-6 months (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EP) equations). Results The median (interquartile range) eGFR decreased by 18.2 (8-12)% after RNU. A total of 37% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60mL/min/1.73m2, which decreased to 16% after RNU (P < 0.001); 72% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 45mL/min/1.73m2, which decreased to 52% after RNU (P < 0.001). The distributions were similar when analyses were restricted to patients with locally advanced disease (pT3-pT4) and/or lymph node metastasis. Patients older than the median age of 70 years were more likely to have a decrease in eGFR after RNU (P < 0.001). None of the renal function variables was associated with clinical outcomes such as disease recurrence, cancer-specific and overall mortality; however, when analyses were restricted to patients who had no adjuvant chemotherapy and did not experience disease recurrence (n = 431), a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60mL/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.03) and a postoperative eGFR ≥ 45mL/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival in univariable analyses. Conclusions In patients who had UTUC, eGFR was low and furthermore, it significantly decreased after RNU. Renal function did not affect cancer-specific outcomes after RNU. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high‐risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and results in decreased overall survival in various malignancies. The study shows that only a small proportion of patients had a preoperative renal function that would allow cisplatin‐based chemotherapy. Moreover, eGFR significantly decreased after RNU, thereby lowering the rate of cisplatin eligibility to only 16 and 52% of patients based on the thresholds of 60 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Taken together with the rest of the literature, the findings of the study support the use of cisplatin‐based chemotherapy, when indicated, in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting. Objective To report (i) the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in patients undergoing radical nephro‐ureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); (ii) the rate of change in eGFR in patients eligible for cisplatin‐based chemotherapy; and (iii) the association of preoperative, postoperative and rate of change of renal function variables with survival outcomes. Patient and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 666 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at seven international institutions from 1994 to 2007. The eGFR was calculated at baseline and at 3–6 months (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD‐EP) equations). Results The median (interquartile range) eGFR decreased by 18.2 (8–12)% after RNU. A total of 37% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, which decreased to 16% after RNU (P < 0.001); 72% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, which decreased to 52% after RNU (P < 0.001). The distributions were similar when analyses were restricted to patients with locally advanced disease (pT3–pT4) and/or lymph node metastasis. Patients older than the median age of 70 years were more likely to have a decrease in eGFR after RNU (P < 0.001). None of the renal function variables was associated with clinical outcomes such as disease recurrence, cancer‐specific and overall mortality; however, when analyses were restricted to patients who had no adjuvant chemotherapy and did not experience disease recurrence (n = 431), a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.03) and a postoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival in univariable analyses. Conclusions In patients who had UTUC, eGFR was low and furthermore, it significantly decreased after RNU. Renal function did not affect cancer‐specific outcomes after RNU. What's known on the subject? and what does the study add?: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and results in decreased overall survival in various malignancies. The study shows that only a small proportion of patients had a preoperative renal function that would allow cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Moreover, eGFR significantly decreased after RNU, thereby lowering the rate of cisplatin eligibility to only 16 and 52% of patients based on the thresholds of 60 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , respectively. Taken together with the rest of the literature, the findings of the study support the use of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, when indicated, in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting.UNLABELLEDWhat's known on the subject? and what does the study add?: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC), results in loss of a renal unit. Loss of renal function decreases eligibility for systemic chemotherapies and results in decreased overall survival in various malignancies. The study shows that only a small proportion of patients had a preoperative renal function that would allow cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Moreover, eGFR significantly decreased after RNU, thereby lowering the rate of cisplatin eligibility to only 16 and 52% of patients based on the thresholds of 60 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , respectively. Taken together with the rest of the literature, the findings of the study support the use of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, when indicated, in the neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant setting.To report (i) the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in patients undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); (ii) the rate of change in eGFR in patients eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy; and (iii) the association of preoperative, postoperative and rate of change of renal function variables with survival outcomes.OBJECTIVETo report (i) the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in patients undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); (ii) the rate of change in eGFR in patients eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy; and (iii) the association of preoperative, postoperative and rate of change of renal function variables with survival outcomes.We performed a retrospective analysis of 666 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at seven international institutions from 1994 to 2007. The eGFR was calculated at baseline and at 3-6 months (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EP) equations).PATIENT AND METHODSWe performed a retrospective analysis of 666 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at seven international institutions from 1994 to 2007. The eGFR was calculated at baseline and at 3-6 months (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EP) equations).The median (interquartile range) eGFR decreased by 18.2 (8-12)% after RNU. A total of 37% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , which decreased to 16% after RNU (P < 0.001); 72% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , which decreased to 52% after RNU (P < 0.001). The distributions were similar when analyses were restricted to patients with locally advanced disease (pT3-pT4) and/or lymph node metastasis. Patients older than the median age of 70 years were more likely to have a decrease in eGFR after RNU (P < 0.001). None of the renal function variables was associated with clinical outcomes such as disease recurrence, cancer-specific and overall mortality; however, when analyses were restricted to patients who had no adjuvant chemotherapy and did not experience disease recurrence (n = 431), a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.03) and a postoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival in univariable analyses.RESULTSThe median (interquartile range) eGFR decreased by 18.2 (8-12)% after RNU. A total of 37% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , which decreased to 16% after RNU (P < 0.001); 72% of patients had a preoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , which decreased to 52% after RNU (P < 0.001). The distributions were similar when analyses were restricted to patients with locally advanced disease (pT3-pT4) and/or lymph node metastasis. Patients older than the median age of 70 years were more likely to have a decrease in eGFR after RNU (P < 0.001). None of the renal function variables was associated with clinical outcomes such as disease recurrence, cancer-specific and overall mortality; however, when analyses were restricted to patients who had no adjuvant chemotherapy and did not experience disease recurrence (n = 431), a preoperative eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.03) and a postoperative eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival in univariable analyses.In patients who had UTUC, eGFR was low and furthermore, it significantly decreased after RNU. Renal function did not affect cancer-specific outcomes after RNU.CONCLUSIONSIn patients who had UTUC, eGFR was low and furthermore, it significantly decreased after RNU. Renal function did not affect cancer-specific outcomes after RNU. |
Author | Weizer, Alon Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Comploj, Evi Pycha, Armin Lotan, Yair Novara, Giacomo Ficarra, Vincenzo Xylinas, Evanguelos Scherr, Douglas S. Trinh, Quoc‐Dien Margulis, Vitaly Montorsi, Francesco Lee, Richard K. Seitz, Christian Roupret, Morgan Raman, Jay D. Rink, Michael Shariat, Shahrokh F. Clozel, Thomas Zerbib, Marc |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Evanguelos surname: Xylinas fullname: Xylinas, Evanguelos organization: Paris Descartes University – sequence: 2 givenname: Michael surname: Rink fullname: Rink, Michael organization: University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf – sequence: 3 givenname: Vitaly surname: Margulis fullname: Margulis, Vitaly organization: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center – sequence: 4 givenname: Thomas surname: Clozel fullname: Clozel, Thomas organization: New York‐Presbyterian Hospital – sequence: 5 givenname: Richard K. surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Richard K. organization: New York‐Presbyterian Hospital – sequence: 6 givenname: Evi surname: Comploj fullname: Comploj, Evi organization: General Hospital of Bolzano – sequence: 7 givenname: Giacomo surname: Novara fullname: Novara, Giacomo organization: University of Padua – sequence: 8 givenname: Jay D. surname: Raman fullname: Raman, Jay D. organization: Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center – sequence: 9 givenname: Yair surname: Lotan fullname: Lotan, Yair organization: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center – sequence: 10 givenname: Alon surname: Weizer fullname: Weizer, Alon organization: University of Michigan – sequence: 11 givenname: Morgan surname: Roupret fullname: Roupret, Morgan organization: Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie – sequence: 12 givenname: Armin surname: Pycha fullname: Pycha, Armin organization: General Hospital of Bolzano – sequence: 13 givenname: Douglas S. surname: Scherr fullname: Scherr, Douglas S. organization: New York‐Presbyterian Hospital – sequence: 14 givenname: Christian surname: Seitz fullname: Seitz, Christian organization: Teaching Hospital of the Medical University of Vienna – sequence: 15 givenname: Vincenzo surname: Ficarra fullname: Ficarra, Vincenzo organization: University of Padua – sequence: 16 givenname: Quoc‐Dien surname: Trinh fullname: Trinh, Quoc‐Dien organization: University of Montreal – sequence: 17 givenname: Pierre I. surname: Karakiewicz fullname: Karakiewicz, Pierre I. organization: University of Montreal – sequence: 18 givenname: Francesco surname: Montorsi fullname: Montorsi, Francesco organization: Vita‐Salute University – sequence: 19 givenname: Marc surname: Zerbib fullname: Zerbib, Marc organization: Paris Descartes University – sequence: 20 givenname: Shahrokh F. surname: Shariat fullname: Shariat, Shahrokh F. organization: New York‐Presbyterian Hospital |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27553185$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23464979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkc1q3DAQx01JaT7aVyiCUuhlt5JsyfGl0IR-pAR6aaA3IUujWIstuZK8iW-lT9Bn7JNUTnZbyClCoGHmNzOa-R8XB847KApE8Jrk83azJhWvVhXB39cUE5q9vGrWt0-Ko3-Bg72NG35YHMe4wTg7OHtWHNIyR5q6OSp-XQyjVAl5gwI42SMzOZWsdyhf6O21bW1v04yMD0h1MPjUQZDjjKTTKE5ha7c5yzo0ymTBpYhuOo86uQU0OQ3hOv8cBamtypiDsQv-z8_fU4AEAVTyw_y8eGpkH-HF7j0prj5--Hb-eXX59dPF-fvLlWJV1ay4JIbWWlalBkMZ5RIDaWsKbV0xygiTmNR5vlaVimqmGwOacKxrQphhGJcnxZv7umPwPyaISQw2Kuh76cBPUZCKUMZqTpuMvnqAbvwU8noyVbOSNoTzhXq5o6Z2AC3GYAcZZrHfbgZe7wAZ8_gmSKds_M_VjJXklGXu3T2ngo8xgBHKJrmokIK0vSBYLLKLjVgUFYu6YpFd3MkubnOB0wcF9j0ekbrrfWN7mB-dJ86-XN2Z5V_wX8bm |
CODEN | BJINFO |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_20554 crossref_primary_10_1586_14737140_2014_882774 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2016_08_008 crossref_primary_10_1002_bco2_81 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2024_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2022_06_014 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_023_04300_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2016_11_019 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_529186 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_purol_2022_08_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2021_01_014 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajco_12856 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14194841 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_023_04330_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2018_01_005 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15184585 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2020_08_015 crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_12597 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00120_018_0830_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2017_03_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2017_07_012 crossref_primary_10_1080_14656566_2022_2150966 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2013_09_031 crossref_primary_10_1093_jjco_hyab081 crossref_primary_10_1093_jjco_hyv136 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2015_03_006 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_969106 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2020_04_043 crossref_primary_10_1080_14737140_2019_1698295 crossref_primary_10_1200_EDBK_237451 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_015_1566_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2016_07_015 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_872273 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2020_04_025 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_017_1150_x crossref_primary_10_22141_2663_3272_4_2_2021_238667 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_016_1871_x crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_14020 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24087486 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000806 crossref_primary_10_3892_mco_2024_2735 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2022_01_004 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000895 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_024_02468_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00092_019_2060_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2024_102203 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2021_03_003 crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMoa2034442 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2016_07_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2021_03_008 crossref_primary_10_1097_CAD_0000000000001200 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fjurol_2024_102722 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics13051004 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000148 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_87573_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2018_04_012 crossref_primary_10_4103_UROS_UROS_54_22 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_020_03479_3 crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2015_0822 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urols_2015_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1093_jjco_hyaa256 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1166_7087_20_30750_8 crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_2988 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_019_08128_7 crossref_primary_10_1093_jjco_hyv180 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms22168761 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2013_12_008 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_016_1995_z crossref_primary_10_3390_genes12030333 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000832 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2016_04_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clgc_2014_10_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2016_10_022 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12894_023_01265_y crossref_primary_10_1111_iju_13855 crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines11071775 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_022_03429_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_critrevonc_2019_01_019 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_61479 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000020184 crossref_primary_10_3346_jkms_2017_32_2_335 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_21551 crossref_primary_10_1111_iju_15192 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10184155 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_024_05267_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_014_1311_8 crossref_primary_10_15406_unoaj_2014_01_00002 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2021_723669 crossref_primary_10_4103_HUAJ_HUAJ_8_20 crossref_primary_10_1080_14737140_2018_1481395 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2024_04_012 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12894_024_01627_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_020_01650_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2024_01_005 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15092414 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2017_05_009 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0129268 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fpurol_2024_07_206 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2019_06_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e22408 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_54232_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2013_09_010 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_9753 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11864_019_0637_2 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13578_023_01061_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2022_11_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2021_05_037 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0171701 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2021_05_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_017_2139_9 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000001276 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.042 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.035 10.1002/cncr.26172 10.1002/cncr.25043 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.021 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.017 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.049 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.020 10.1002/cncr.25050 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.039 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.011 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.077 10.1007/978-1-4757-3656-4 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.053 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.029 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.055 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.07.054 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.029 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08003.x 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.002 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.104 10.1002/cncr.24135 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.005 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.006 10.1097/00000478-199812000-00001 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013 10.1038/nrurol.2011.96 10.1016/j.urology.2011.01.002 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 BJU International 2014 INIST-CNRS 2013 BJU International. BJUI © 2013 BJU International |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 BJU International – notice: 2014 INIST-CNRS – notice: 2013 BJU International. – notice: BJUI © 2013 BJU International |
CorporateAuthor | UTUC Collaboration |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: UTUC Collaboration |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11649.x |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1464-410X |
EndPage | 461 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3911931271 23464979 27553185 10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11649_x BJU11649 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .55 .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 23N 24P 2WC 31~ 33P 36B 3O- 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 6P2 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABJNI ABLJU ABOCM ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACUHS ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BAWUL BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DIK DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EBC EBD EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FUBAC G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M J5H K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RJQFR ROL RX1 SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQJ WRC WVDHM WXI WXSBR X7M XG1 YFH ZGI ZXP ~IA ~WT AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGYGG CITATION IQODW AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5449-6a1f27da43def2526a0e1b72eb7452515a017466bc3c2d5d9fed160d7115f5003 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1464-4096 1464-410X |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 16:06:06 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 14 07:08:28 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:49:44 EDT 2025 Wed Apr 02 07:15:04 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:50:01 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:09 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:51:44 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Antineoplastic agent Human Nephrology Urinary system disease Renal function Prognosis Nephroureterectomy upper tract urothelial carcinoma Urinary tract disease Malignant tumor Upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma Survival Cisplatin Urology Glomerular filtration rate Alkylating agent Chemotherapy Treatment Surgery radical nephroureterectomy Cancer Platinum II Complexes renal function chemotherapy |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 2013 BJU International. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5449-6a1f27da43def2526a0e1b72eb7452515a017466bc3c2d5d9fed160d7115f5003 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11649.x |
PMID | 23464979 |
PQID | 1753291669 |
PQPubID | 1026371 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1412557629 proquest_journals_1753291669 pubmed_primary_23464979 pascalfrancis_primary_27553185 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11649_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11649_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11649_x_BJU11649 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | August 2013 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2013 text: August 2013 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford – name: England – name: Edgecliff |
PublicationTitle | BJU international |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BJU Int |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley-Blackwell – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | 2012; 61 2010; 76 2010; 58 2011; 117 2010; 57 2009; 53 2006; 68 2009; 181 2010; 116 2009; 182 2011; 60 1999; 130 2009; 150 2010; 184 2011; 78 2011; 59 2008; 179 2002 2007; 52 2005; 48 2009; 103 2011; 8 2009; 115 1998; 22 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 181 start-page: 2482 year: 2009 end-page: 2489 article-title: Impact of lymph node dissection on cancer specific survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy publication-title: J Urol – volume: 116 start-page: 3127 year: 2010 end-page: 3134 article-title: Incidence of downstaging and complete remission after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high‐risk upper tract transitional cell carcinoma publication-title: Cancer – volume: 76 start-page: 895 year: 2010 end-page: 901 article-title: Troubling outcomes from population‐level analysis of surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma publication-title: Urology – volume: 59 start-page: 584 year: 2011 end-page: 594 article-title: European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas: 2011 update publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 48 start-page: 202 year: 2005 end-page: 205 article-title: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: update of a systematic review and meta‐analysis of individual patient data advanced bladder cancer (ABC) meta‐analysis collaboration publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 116 start-page: 2967 year: 2010 end-page: 2973 article-title: Chronic kidney disease after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma and implications for the administration of perioperative chemotherapy publication-title: Cancer – volume: 58 start-page: 581 year: 2010 end-page: 587 article-title: Changes in renal function following nephroureterectomy may affect the use of perioperative chemotherapy publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 52 start-page: 148 year: 2007 end-page: 154 article-title: Morbidity and clinical outcome of nephron‐sparing surgery in relation to tumour size and indication publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 182 start-page: 900 year: 2009 end-page: 906 article-title: Adjuvant chemotherapy for high risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration publication-title: J Urol – volume: 57 start-page: 1064 year: 2010 end-page: 1071 article-title: Prognostic role of lymphovascular invasion in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: an international validation study publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 103 start-page: 307 year: 2009 end-page: 311 article-title: Tumour architecture is an independent predictor of outcomes after nephroureterectomy: a multi‐institutional analysis of 1363 patients publication-title: BJU Int – volume: 130 start-page: 461 year: 1999 end-page: 470 article-title: A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation publication-title: Ann Intern Med – volume: 48 start-page: 189 year: 2005 end-page: 199 article-title: Adjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of individual patient data advanced bladder cancer (ABC) meta‐analysis collaboration publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 61 start-page: 245 year: 2012 end-page: 253 article-title: The impact of tumor multifocality on outcomes in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 57 start-page: 575 year: 2010 end-page: 581 article-title: Tumour necrosis is an indicator of aggressive biology in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 60 start-page: 1258 year: 2011 end-page: 1265 article-title: Ureteral and multifocal tumours have worse prognosis than renal pelvic tumours in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract treated by nephroureterectomy publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 115 start-page: 1224 year: 2009 end-page: 1233 article-title: Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration publication-title: Cancer – volume: 150 start-page: 604 year: 2009 end-page: 612 article-title: A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate publication-title: Ann Intern Med – volume: 68 start-page: 53 year: 2006 end-page: 57 article-title: Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract publication-title: Urology – volume: 117 start-page: 5500 year: 2011 end-page: 5508 article-title: Outcomes after adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of high‐risk urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT‐UC): results from a large multicenter collaborative study publication-title: Cancer – volume: 8 start-page: 440 year: 2011 end-page: 447 article-title: Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma publication-title: Nat Rev Urol – volume: 59 start-page: 543 year: 2011 end-page: 552 article-title: A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron‐sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low‐stage renal cell carcinoma publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 179 start-page: 468 year: 2008 end-page: 471 article-title: Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy publication-title: J Urol – year: 2002 – volume: 184 start-page: 1867 year: 2010 end-page: 1871 article-title: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration versus Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations for renal function evaluation in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy publication-title: J Urol – volume: 78 start-page: 61 year: 2011 end-page: 67 article-title: Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy and regional lymphadenectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy publication-title: Urology – volume: 53 start-page: 46 year: 2009 end-page: 55 article-title: CKD surveillance using laboratory data from the population‐based National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) publication-title: Am J Kidney Dis – volume: 22 start-page: 1435 year: 1998 end-page: 1448 article-title: The World Health Organization / International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee publication-title: Am J Surg Pathol – volume: 61 start-page: 854 year: 2012 end-page: 855 article-title: Death Certificates Are Valid for the Determination of Cause of Death in Patients With Upper and Lower Tract Urothelial Carcinoma publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 57 start-page: 1072 year: 2010 end-page: 1079 article-title: Impact of tumor location on prognosis for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma managed by radical nephroureterectomy publication-title: Eur Urol – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.042 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.035 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1002/cncr.26172 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1002/cncr.25043 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.021 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.017 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.049 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.020 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1002/cncr.25050 – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.039 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.011 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.077 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3656-4 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.053 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.029 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.055 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.07.054 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.029 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08003.x – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.002 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.104 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1002/cncr.24135 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.005 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.006 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1097/00000478-199812000-00001 – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013 – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.96 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.01.002 |
SSID | ssj0014665 |
Score | 2.451816 |
Snippet | What's known on the subject? and What does the study add?
Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high‐risk urothelial carcinoma... What's known on the subject? and what does the study add?: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high-risk urothelial carcinoma... What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), the standard of care treatment for high-risk urothelial carcinoma... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 453 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Biological and medical sciences Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - drug therapy Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - mortality Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - physiopathology Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - surgery Chemotherapy Female Glomerular Filtration Rate Humans Kidney Function Tests Kidney Neoplasms - drug therapy Kidney Neoplasms - mortality Kidney Neoplasms - physiopathology Kidney Neoplasms - surgery Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Mortality Nephrectomy - methods Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Patient Selection radical nephroureterectomy renal function Retrospective Studies Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the urinary system Survival Rate Tumors of the urinary system upper tract urothelial carcinoma Ureter - surgery Urinary tract. Prostate gland |
Title | Impact of renal function on eligibility for chemotherapy and survival in patients who have undergone radical nephro‐ureterectomy |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2012.11649.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23464979 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1753291669 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1412557629 |
Volume | 112 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3BbtQwELVQDwipopQWutBWRuKa1cZrx_UREFVbqRwQK-3NsmO7RaVJlWwKywnxBXwjX8KMk02VqocKVcphlXiysTMzfo7fzBDy1vjJNDgbEpGGPOE2E4nhsEqRjisWVMCakMi2-JQdzfjJXMw7_hPGwrT5IfoPbmgZ0V-jgRtb3zZynvB0MkeGFoPzGVdjxJNI3UJ89LnPJAVNY1XJVgRg-5DUc-eNBjPV-pWpYdBCW-3iLjg6RLdxejrcIBerjrWslItxs7Dj_OetnI8P0_Nn5GmHYum7Vu02ySNfPCePT7t9-i3y-zgGX9Iy0MpjS5w-UQUoHJEEHTm5SwqQmYLaXHZxYEtqCkfrBvwXWAD9WtAu72tNv5-X9Nxce4pRb9VZWXhambjJRAsPGln-_fWnqZDcg_sQl8ttMjv8-OXDUdJVe0hywblKMpMGJp3hU-cDEywzE59aybyVuPeaCgPOA16jzac5c8Kp4F2aTZwETBsEOKcXZK2AP98h1PJMMKcOFKA3zliwQnGV4xdPDjO2OBgRuXqzOu9SoWNFjm96sCTiGodY4xDrOMT6x4ikveRVmw7kHjL7A-XpBZkUAoPXR2R3pU268yC1xgyqDLB7pkbkTX8ZbB83dEzhywbacOggLBgZtHnZauHNzafwMErCFRl16d6Pq9-fzOLPV_8t-Zo8YbFqCPIkd8naomr8HmC3hd2PVvkPTPE1iw |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQkQAJ8S4slGIkrlltvHZcH3lV29L2gLrS3iw7tilqm1TZDbA9VfwCfiO_hBknG5Sqhwoh5RAlniR2ZsafPS9C3hg_GgdnQyLSkCfcZiIxHFYp0nHFggpYExK9LQ6yyZTvzsSsLQeEsTBNfohuww0lI-prFHDckL4s5Tzh6WiGLloMrmdcDQFQ3sQC31jO4MPnLpcUtI11JRsaAO59t54rn9Sbq-6emTkMW2jqXVwFSPv4Nk5Q2_fJyaprjV_K8bBe2GF-finr43_q-wNyrwWy9G3DeQ_JDV88Irf2W1P9Y_JzJ8Zf0jLQymNLnEGRCygc0Q86uuUuKaBmCpxz2oaCLakpHJ3XoMJACOjXgrapX-f0-1FJj8w3TzHwrfpSFp5WJtqZaOGBKcvfF7_qCv170BRxunxCptsfD99PkrbgQ5ILzlWSmTQw6QwfOx-YYJkZ-dRK5q1E82sqDOgP-I82H-fMCaeCd2k2chJgbRCgn9bJWgEvf0aoBRZgTm0pAHCcsWCF4irHTU8Ok7bYGhC5-rU6b7OhY1GOE91bFXGNQ6xxiHUcYv1jQNKO8qzJCHINms0e93SETAqB8esDsrFiJ90qkbnGJKoM4HumBuR1dxvEH206pvBlDW04dBDWjAzaPG3Y8O_Dx_AxSsIdGZnp2p-r3-1O4-nzf6Z8RW5PDvf39N7OwacX5A6LRUTQbXKDrC2q2r8EKLewm1FE_wCY2zml |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQkSokxJuyUIqRuGa18dpxfSyPVVugQoiV9mbZsU1R22SV3QDbE-IX8Bv5Jcw42aBUPVQIKYco9iSxMzP-nHkR8sL40Tg4GxKRhjzhNhOJ4bBLkY4rFlTAmpDobXGU7U_54UzMWv8njIVp8kN0P9xQMqK-RgGfu3BRyHnC09EMPbQYXM-4GgKevM4zkB0ESB-7VFLQN5aVbGgAt_e9ei69U2-pujk3C5i10JS7uAyP9uFtXJ8mt8nJemSNW8rJsF7aYX5-Ienj_xn6HXKrhbF0r-G7u-SaL-6Rzfetof4--XkQoy9pGWjlsSeun8gDFI7oBR2dclcUMDMFvjlrA8FW1BSOLmpQYCAC9EtB28SvC_rtuKTH5qunGPZWfS4LTysTrUy08MCS5e8fv-oKvXvQEHG2ekCmkzefXu0nbbmHJBecqyQzaWDSGT52PjDBMjPyqZXMW4nG11QY0B7wGW0-zpkTTgXv0mzkJIDaIEA7PSQbBTz8EaGWZ4I5tasAvnHGghWKqxx_eXJYssXugMj1l9V5mwsdS3Kc6t6eiGucYo1TrOMU6-8DknaU8yYfyBVodnrM0xEyKQRGrw_I9pqbdKtCFhpTqDIA75kakOddMwg_WnRM4csa-nAYIOwYGfTZarjw783H8DJKQouMvHTl19UvD6fx9PE_Uz4jmx9eT_S7g6O3T8gNFiuIoM_kNtlYVrV_CjhuaXeigP4BzeA4XQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact+of+renal+function+on+eligibility+for+chemotherapy+and+survival+in+patients+who+have+undergone+radical+nephro%E2%80%90ureterectomy&rft.jtitle=BJU+international&rft.au=Xylinas%2C+Evanguelos&rft.au=Rink%2C+Michael&rft.au=Margulis%2C+Vitaly&rft.au=Clozel%2C+Thomas&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=461&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2012.11649.x&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_j_1464_410X_2012_11649_x |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1464-4096&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1464-4096&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1464-4096&client=summon |