Comparison of greenhouse gas fluxes from tropical forests and oil palm plantations on mineral soil

In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes remains highly uncertain, mainly due to a relatively small pool of available data. The aim of this study is to quantify differences of nitrous oxid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiogeosciences Vol. 18; no. 5; pp. 1559 - 1575
Main Authors Drewer, Julia, Leduning, Melissa M., Griffiths, Robert I., Goodall, Tim, Levy, Peter E., Cowan, Nicholas, Comynn-Platt, Edward, Hayman, Garry, Sentian, Justin, Majalap, Noreen, Skiba, Ute M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 04.03.2021
Copernicus Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes remains highly uncertain, mainly due to a relatively small pool of available data. The aim of this study is to quantify differences of nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) fluxes as well as soil carbon dioxide (CO2) respiration rates from logged forests, oil palm plantations of different ages, and an adjacent small riparian area. Nitrous oxide fluxes are the focus of this study, as these emissions are expected to increase significantly due to the nitrogen (N) fertilizer application in the plantations. This study was conducted in the SAFE (Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems) landscape in Malaysian Borneo (Sabah) with measurements every 2 months over a 2-year period. GHG fluxes were measured by static chambers together with key soil physicochemical parameters and microbial biodiversity. At all sites, N2O fluxes were spatially and temporally highly variable. On average the largest fluxes (incl. 95 % CI) were measured from OP plantations (45.1 (24.0–78.5) µg m−2 h−1 N2O-N), slightly smaller fluxes from the riparian area (29.4 (2.8–84.7) µg m−2 h−1 N2O-N), and the smallest fluxes from logged forests (16.0 (4.0–36.3) µg m−2 h−1 N2O-N). Methane fluxes were generally small (mean ± SD): −2.6 ± 17.2 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1 for OP and 1.3 ± 12.6 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1 for riparian, with the range of measured CH4 fluxes being largest in logged forests (2.2 ± 48.3 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1). Soil respiration rates were larger from riparian areas (157.7 ± 106 mg m−2 h−1 CO2-C) and logged forests (137.4 ± 95 mg m−2 h−1 CO2-C) than OP plantations (93.3 ± 70 mg m−2 h−1 CO2-C) as a result of larger amounts of decomposing leaf litter. Microbial communities were distinctly different between the different land-use types and sites. Bacterial communities were linked to soil pH, and fungal and eukaryotic communities were linked to land use. Despite measuring a large number of environmental parameters, mixed models could only explain up to 17 % of the variance of measured fluxes for N2O, 3 % of CH4, and 25 % of soil respiration. Scaling up measured N2O fluxes to Sabah using land areas for forest and OP resulted in emissions increasing from 7.6 Mt (95 % confidence interval, −3.0–22.3 Mt) yr−1 in 1973 to 11.4 Mt (0.2–28.6 Mt) yr−1 in 2015 due to the increasing area of forest converted to OP plantations over the last ∼ 40 years.
AbstractList In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes remains highly uncertain, mainly due to a relatively small pool of available data. The aim of this study is to quantify differences of nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) fluxes as well as soil carbon dioxide (CO2) respiration rates from logged forests, oil palm plantations of different ages, and an adjacent small riparian area. Nitrous oxide fluxes are the focus of this study, as these emissions are expected to increase significantly due to the nitrogen (N) fertilizer application in the plantations. This study was conducted in the SAFE (Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems) landscape in Malaysian Borneo (Sabah) with measurements every 2 months over a 2-year period. GHG fluxes were measured by static chambers together with key soil physicochemical parameters and microbial biodiversity. At all sites, N2O fluxes were spatially and temporally highly variable. On average the largest fluxes (incl. 95 % CI) were measured from OP plantations (45.1 (24.0–78.5) µg m-2 h-1 N2O-N), slightly smaller fluxes from the riparian area (29.4 (2.8–84.7) µg m-2 h-1 N2O-N), and the smallest fluxes from logged forests (16.0 (4.0–36.3) µg m-2 h-1 N2O-N). Methane fluxes were generally small (mean ± SD): -2.6 ± 17.2 µg CH4-C m-2 h-1 for OP and 1.3 ± 12.6 µg CH4-C m-2 h-1 for riparian, with the range of measured CH4 fluxes being largest in logged forests (2.2 ± 48.3 µg CH4-C m-2 h-1). Soil respiration rates were larger from riparian areas (157.7 ± 106 mg m-2 h-1 CO2-C) and logged forests (137.4 ± 95 mg m-2 h-1 CO2-C) than OP plantations (93.3 ± 70 mg m-2 h-1 CO2-C) as a result of larger amounts of decomposing leaf litter. Microbial communities were distinctly different between the different land-use types and sites. Bacterial communities were linked to soil pH, and fungal and eukaryotic communities were linked to land use. Despite measuring a large number of environmental parameters, mixed models could only explain up to 17 % of the variance of measured fluxes for N2O, 3 % of CH4, and 25 % of soil respiration. Scaling up measured N2O fluxes to Sabah using land areas for forest and OP resulted in emissions increasing from 7.6 Mt (95 % confidence interval,-3.0–22.3 Mt) yr-1 in 1973 to 11.4 Mt (0.2–28.6 Mt) yr-1 in 2015 due to the increasing area of forest converted to OP plantations over the last∼ 40 years.
In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes remains highly uncertain, mainly due to a relatively small pool of available data. The aim of this study is to quantify differences of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) and methane (CH 4 ) fluxes as well as soil carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) respiration rates from logged forests, oil palm plantations of different ages, and an adjacent small riparian area. Nitrous oxide fluxes are the focus of this study, as these emissions are expected to increase significantly due to the nitrogen (N) fertilizer application in the plantations. This study was conducted in the SAFE (Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems) landscape in Malaysian Borneo (Sabah) with measurements every 2 months over a 2-year period. GHG fluxes were measured by static chambers together with key soil physicochemical parameters and microbial biodiversity. At all sites, N 2 O fluxes were spatially and temporally highly variable. On average the largest fluxes (incl. 95 % CI) were measured from OP plantations (45.1 (24.0–78.5)  µ g m −2  h −1  N 2 O-N), slightly smaller fluxes from the riparian area (29.4 (2.8–84.7)  µ g m −2  h −1  N 2 O-N), and the smallest fluxes from logged forests (16.0 (4.0–36.3)  µ g m −2  h −1  N 2 O-N). Methane fluxes were generally small (mean  ±  SD): − 2.6  ±  17.2  µ g CH 4 -C m −2  h −1 for OP and 1.3  ±  12.6  µ g CH 4 -C m −2  h −1 for riparian, with the range of measured CH 4 fluxes being largest in logged forests (2.2  ±  48.3  µ g CH 4 -C m −2  h −1 ). Soil respiration rates were larger from riparian areas (157.7  ±  106 mg m −2  h −1  CO 2 -C) and logged forests (137.4  ±  95 mg m −2  h −1  CO 2 -C) than OP plantations (93.3  ±  70 mg m −2  h −1  CO 2 -C) as a result of larger amounts of decomposing leaf litter. Microbial communities were distinctly different between the different land-use types and sites. Bacterial communities were linked to soil pH, and fungal and eukaryotic communities were linked to land use. Despite measuring a large number of environmental parameters, mixed models could only explain up to 17 % of the variance of measured fluxes for N 2 O, 3 % of CH 4 , and 25 % of soil respiration. Scaling up measured N 2 O fluxes to Sabah using land areas for forest and OP resulted in emissions increasing from 7.6 Mt (95 % confidence interval, − 3.0–22.3 Mt) yr −1 in 1973 to 11.4 Mt (0.2–28.6 Mt) yr −1 in 2015 due to the increasing area of forest converted to OP plantations over the last ∼  40 years.
In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes remains highly uncertain, mainly due to a relatively small pool of available data. The aim of this study is to quantify differences of nitrous oxide (N.sub.2 O) and methane (CH.sub.4) fluxes as well as soil carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) respiration rates from logged forests, oil palm plantations of different ages, and an adjacent small riparian area. Nitrous oxide fluxes are the focus of this study, as these emissions are expected to increase significantly due to the nitrogen (N) fertilizer application in the plantations. This study was conducted in the SAFE (Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems) landscape in Malaysian Borneo (Sabah) with measurements every 2 months over a 2-year period. GHG fluxes were measured by static chambers together with key soil physicochemical parameters and microbial biodiversity. At all sites, N.sub.2 O fluxes were spatially and temporally highly variable. On average the largest fluxes (incl. 95 % CI) were measured from OP plantations (45.1 (24.0-78.5) µg m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 N.sub.2 O-N), slightly smaller fluxes from the riparian area (29.4 (2.8-84.7) µg m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 N.sub.2 O-N), and the smallest fluxes from logged forests (16.0 (4.0-36.3) µg m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 N.sub.2 O-N). Methane fluxes were generally small (mean ± SD): -2.6 ± 17.2 µg CH.sub.4 -C m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 for OP and 1.3 ± 12.6 µg CH.sub.4 -C m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 for riparian, with the range of measured CH.sub.4 fluxes being largest in logged forests (2.2 ± 48.3 µg CH.sub.4 -C m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1). Soil respiration rates were larger from riparian areas (157.7 ± 106 mg m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 CO.sub.2 -C) and logged forests (137.4 ± 95 mg m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 CO.sub.2 -C) than OP plantations (93.3 ± 70 mg m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 CO.sub.2 -C) as a result of larger amounts of decomposing leaf litter. Microbial communities were distinctly different between the different land-use types and sites. Bacterial communities were linked to soil pH, and fungal and eukaryotic communities were linked to land use. Despite measuring a large number of environmental parameters, mixed models could only explain up to 17 % of the variance of measured fluxes for N.sub.2 O, 3 % of CH.sub.4, and 25 % of soil respiration. Scaling up measured N.sub.2 O fluxes to Sabah using land areas for forest and OP resulted in emissions increasing from 7.6 Mt (95 % confidence interval, -3.0-22.3 Mt) yr.sup.-1 in 1973 to 11.4 Mt (0.2-28.6 Mt) yr.sup.-1 in 2015 due to the increasing area of forest converted to OP plantations over the last ⼠40 years.
In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes remains highly uncertain, mainly due to a relatively small pool of available data. The aim of this study is to quantify differences of nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) fluxes as well as soil carbon dioxide (CO2) respiration rates from logged forests, oil palm plantations of different ages, and an adjacent small riparian area. Nitrous oxide fluxes are the focus of this study, as these emissions are expected to increase significantly due to the nitrogen (N) fertilizer application in the plantations. This study was conducted in the SAFE (Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems) landscape in Malaysian Borneo (Sabah) with measurements every 2 months over a 2-year period. GHG fluxes were measured by static chambers together with key soil physicochemical parameters and microbial biodiversity. At all sites, N2O fluxes were spatially and temporally highly variable. On average the largest fluxes (incl. 95 % CI) were measured from OP plantations (45.1 (24.0–78.5) µg m−2 h−1 N2O-N), slightly smaller fluxes from the riparian area (29.4 (2.8–84.7) µg m−2 h−1 N2O-N), and the smallest fluxes from logged forests (16.0 (4.0–36.3) µg m−2 h−1 N2O-N). Methane fluxes were generally small (mean ± SD): −2.6 ± 17.2 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1 for OP and 1.3 ± 12.6 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1 for riparian, with the range of measured CH4 fluxes being largest in logged forests (2.2 ± 48.3 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1). Soil respiration rates were larger from riparian areas (157.7 ± 106 mg m−2 h−1 CO2-C) and logged forests (137.4 ± 95 mg m−2 h−1 CO2-C) than OP plantations (93.3 ± 70 mg m−2 h−1 CO2-C) as a result of larger amounts of decomposing leaf litter. Microbial communities were distinctly different between the different land-use types and sites. Bacterial communities were linked to soil pH, and fungal and eukaryotic communities were linked to land use. Despite measuring a large number of environmental parameters, mixed models could only explain up to 17 % of the variance of measured fluxes for N2O, 3 % of CH4, and 25 % of soil respiration. Scaling up measured N2O fluxes to Sabah using land areas for forest and OP resulted in emissions increasing from 7.6 Mt (95 % confidence interval, −3.0–22.3 Mt) yr−1 in 1973 to 11.4 Mt (0.2–28.6 Mt) yr−1 in 2015 due to the increasing area of forest converted to OP plantations over the last ∼ 40 years.
Audience Academic
Author Sentian, Justin
Leduning, Melissa M.
Cowan, Nicholas
Skiba, Ute M.
Comynn-Platt, Edward
Griffiths, Robert I.
Levy, Peter E.
Hayman, Garry
Drewer, Julia
Goodall, Tim
Majalap, Noreen
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Julia
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6263-6341
  surname: Drewer
  fullname: Drewer, Julia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Melissa M.
  surname: Leduning
  fullname: Leduning, Melissa M.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Robert I.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3341-4547
  surname: Griffiths
  fullname: Griffiths, Robert I.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Tim
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1526-4071
  surname: Goodall
  fullname: Goodall, Tim
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Peter E.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8505-1901
  surname: Levy
  fullname: Levy, Peter E.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Nicholas
  surname: Cowan
  fullname: Cowan, Nicholas
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Edward
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7821-4998
  surname: Comynn-Platt
  fullname: Comynn-Platt, Edward
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Garry
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3825-4156
  surname: Hayman
  fullname: Hayman, Garry
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Justin
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7121-2372
  surname: Sentian
  fullname: Sentian, Justin
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Noreen
  surname: Majalap
  fullname: Majalap, Noreen
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Ute M.
  surname: Skiba
  fullname: Skiba, Ute M.
BookMark eNp1kktr3DAUhUVJocm0624FXXXhRLIsWVqGoY-BQKGPtbjWw9VgS67kgfTfR9MpSae0aHHF5TtH56J7hS5iig6h15Rcc6q6m2FsqGwo56ppSUufoUvat6LpqFQXf9xfoKtS9oQwSSS_RMM2zQvkUFLEyeMxOxe_p0NxeISC_XS4d7XkNOM1pyUYmLBP2ZW1YIgWpzDhBaYZLxPEFdaQYsHVag7R5cqWCrxEzz1Mxb36XTfo2_t3X7cfm7tPH3bb27vG8I6tjWDECm9rUOmU4NAaB6JVRDkHhHeDtFK1g2DM94IpxRi0ylHLvXWSKi_YBu1OvjbBXi85zJB_6gRB_2qkPGrIazCT033PrBoYs501Xcd65ZjxllBe32O-xtmgNyevJacfhzqu3qdDjjW-bjslSA3G6RM1QjUN0ac1g5lDMfpWcCaZFDXnBl3_g6rHujmY-ok-1P6Z4O2ZoDKru19HOJSid18-n7M3J9bkVEp2_nFwSvRxL_Qwair1cS_0cS-qgv-lMOH0czVWmP6rewARxLvt
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_171850
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00248_021_01908_3
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0295157
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2025_109603
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3967094
crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2024_1441266
crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2021_738303
crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_21_513_2024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2022_107953
crossref_primary_10_1002_ppp3_10621
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pstr_0000023
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11676_022_01493_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2024_110866
crossref_primary_10_2965_jwet_22_133
crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2024_1324475
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.agee.2015.08.022
10.3390/agriculture8090133
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02616.x
10.1128/AEM.02541-13
10.1029/2006GB002909
10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00322.x
10.1029/2006GB002734
10.1007/s10533-013-9908-3
10.5194/bg-10-5367-2013
10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.01.010
10.1002/bit.20347
10.1371/journal.pone.0133325
10.1111/mec.13620
10.1007/s13593-016-0353-2
10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125012
10.3389/ffgc.2020.00004
10.5194/bg-13-5433-2016
10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0667:TACMOS]2.0.CO;2
10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.019
10.1016/j.cosust.2012.06.006
10.5194/bg-16-785-2019
10.1007/s00374-019-01421-3
10.1128/AEM.01043-13
10.1111/gcb.14068
10.5194/bg-12-5831-2015
10.1007/s11104-016-3023-x
10.1038/s41467-020-14852-6
10.1007/s10705-004-0382-0
10.18637/jss.v067.i01
10.1080/00380768.2014.960355
10.21894/jopr.2019.0046
10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.006
10.1098/rstb.2011.0049
10.1111/gcb.12907
10.1128/aem.59.3.695-700.1993
10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.04.004
10.3354/ame041091
10.3389/ffgc.2019.00090
10.1111/1365-2664.13280
10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.016
10.1038/srep32017
10.1186/s13021-017-0072-2
10.1007/s00248-017-1043-6
10.1038/nmeth.3869
10.5194/bg-12-7299-2015
10.5194/bg-14-2781-2017
10.1016/j.gfs.2012.10.003
10.1038/543306a
10.1007/s10668-006-9080-1
10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.005
10.1007/s00248-012-0028-8
10.1111/ejss.12432
10.1007/s12155-017-9824-9
10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01437.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2021 Copernicus GmbH
2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 Copernicus GmbH
– notice: 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
ISR
7QO
7SN
7TG
7TN
7UA
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
ABJCF
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BFMQW
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKSAR
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
F1W
FR3
GNUQQ
H95
H96
HCIFZ
KL.
L.G
L6V
LK8
M7N
M7P
M7S
P64
PATMY
PCBAR
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PTHSS
PYCSY
DOA
DOI 10.5194/bg-18-1559-2021
DatabaseName CrossRef
Gale in Context: Science
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
Water Resources Abstracts
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Continental Europe Database
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Central Student
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
SciTech Premium Collection
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Biological Sciences
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Engineering Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Science Database
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Collection
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Essentials
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Central China
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Natural Science Collection
Biological Science Collection
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
ProQuest Central (New)
Engineering Collection
Engineering Database
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database
ProQuest Technology Collection
Continental Europe Database
Biological Science Database
Ecology Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Environmental Science Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
ProQuest Central Korea
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database


CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 1726-4189
EndPage 1575
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_773d9b33d4dc44379e3cfd0152903f54
A653838693
10_5194_bg_18_1559_2021
GeographicLocations Southeast Asia
Borneo
Malaysia
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Borneo
– name: Malaysia
– name: Southeast Asia
GroupedDBID 23N
2WC
2XV
4P2
5GY
5VS
7XC
8FE
8FG
8FH
8R4
8R5
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABJCF
ABUWG
ADBBV
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHGZY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ATCPS
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFMQW
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKSAR
BPHCQ
CCPQU
CITATION
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EDH
EJD
GROUPED_DOAJ
H13
HCIFZ
HH5
IAO
IEA
ISR
ITC
KQ8
L6V
L8X
LK5
LK8
M7P
M7R
M7S
MM-
M~E
OK1
OVT
P2P
PATMY
PCBAR
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PTHSS
PYCSY
Q2X
RKB
RNS
TR2
XSB
~02
BBORY
PMFND
7QO
7SN
7TG
7TN
7UA
8FD
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
F1W
FR3
GNUQQ
H95
H96
KL.
L.G
M7N
P64
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-630d6fd1728e965a2cea62909eea054b8d892b633f7639933a29e1d5fde819f63
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1726-4189
1726-4170
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:16:16 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:03:25 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:28:15 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:28:35 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 04:19:28 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:01:49 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:12 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c543t-630d6fd1728e965a2cea62909eea054b8d892b633f7639933a29e1d5fde819f63
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ORCID 0000-0002-6263-6341
0000-0002-3341-4547
0000-0002-1526-4071
0000-0001-7821-4998
0000-0003-3825-4156
0000-0002-7121-2372
0000-0002-8505-1901
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/773d9b33d4dc44379e3cfd0152903f54
PQID 2496062951
PQPubID 105740
PageCount 17
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_773d9b33d4dc44379e3cfd0152903f54
proquest_journals_2496062951
gale_infotracmisc_A653838693
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A653838693
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A653838693
crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_18_1559_2021
crossref_citationtrail_10_5194_bg_18_1559_2021
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-03-04
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-03-04
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-03-04
  day: 04
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Katlenburg-Lindau
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Katlenburg-Lindau
PublicationTitle Biogeosciences
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Copernicus GmbH
Copernicus Publications
Publisher_xml – name: Copernicus GmbH
– name: Copernicus Publications
References ref13
ref57
ref12
ref56
ref15
ref59
ref14
ref58
ref53
ref52
ref11
ref55
ref10
ref54
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref51
ref50
ref46
ref45
ref48
ref47
ref42
ref41
ref44
ref43
ref49
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref40
ref35
ref34
ref37
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref33
ref32
ref2
ref1
ref39
ref38
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref22
ref21
ref28
ref27
ref29
References_xml – ident: ref37
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.08.022
– ident: ref46
  doi: 10.3390/agriculture8090133
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02616.x
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.02541-13
– ident: ref55
  doi: 10.1029/2006GB002909
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00322.x
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1029/2006GB002734
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1007/s10533-013-9908-3
– ident: ref54
  doi: 10.5194/bg-10-5367-2013
– ident: ref58
  doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.01.010
– ident: ref59
  doi: 10.1002/bit.20347
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133325
– ident: ref51
  doi: 10.1111/mec.13620
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.1007/s13593-016-0353-2
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125012
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00004
– ident: ref39
  doi: 10.5194/bg-13-5433-2016
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0667:TACMOS]2.0.CO;2
– ident: ref47
  doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.019
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.06.006
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.5194/bg-16-785-2019
– ident: ref27
  doi: 10.1007/s00374-019-01421-3
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.01043-13
– ident: ref43
  doi: 10.1111/gcb.14068
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.5194/bg-12-5831-2015
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-3023-x
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14852-6
– ident: ref12
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.1007/s10705-004-0382-0
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
– ident: ref44
  doi: 10.1080/00380768.2014.960355
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.21894/jopr.2019.0046
– ident: ref48
  doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.006
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0049
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1111/gcb.12907
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.1128/aem.59.3.695-700.1993
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.04.004
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.3354/ame041091
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2019.00090
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13280
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.016
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1038/srep32017
– ident: ref41
  doi: 10.1186/s13021-017-0072-2
– ident: ref49
  doi: 10.1007/s00248-017-1043-6
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869
– ident: ref53
  doi: 10.5194/bg-12-7299-2015
– ident: ref4
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.5194/bg-14-2781-2017
– ident: ref45
  doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2012.10.003
– ident: ref57
  doi: 10.1038/543306a
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1007/s10668-006-9080-1
– ident: ref42
– ident: ref56
  doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.005
– ident: ref52
– ident: ref50
  doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0028-8
– ident: ref33
  doi: 10.1111/ejss.12432
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1007/s12155-017-9824-9
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01437.x
SSID ssj0038085
Score 2.405739
Snippet In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes...
In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes...
SourceID doaj
proquest
gale
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 1559
SubjectTerms Air pollution
Biodiversity
Carbon
Carbon content
Carbon dioxide
Climate change
Comparative analysis
Confidence intervals
Emissions
Environment models
Environmental factors
Environmental parameters
Fertilizer application
Fertilizers
Fluxes
Forest ecosystems
Forest soils
Forests
Forests and forestry
Greenhouse gases
Land degradation
Land use
Leaf litter
Methane
Microbial activity
Microorganisms
Nitrogen
Nitrous oxide
Oil
Parameters
Peatlands
Physicochemical processes
Physicochemical properties
Plantations
Respiration
Soil
Soil chemistry
Soil fertility
Soil microbiology
Soil pH
Soil respiration
Soils
Stability
Terrestrial ecosystems
Tropical climate
Tropical forests
Vegetable oils
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Na9wwEBXthkIvoZ9007SIUmgvamxLlu1TSUJC0kMoaQO5CcmS3IDXdte70P77zsjaLXtITgZ7_KEZefTGlt4j5GPhNc-9L5jUiWMi9RVDbSsmPNdpWkuZu8D2eSUvbsS32_w2fnAb47TKTU4Midr2NX4jP4IyAbB2BoDg6_CboWoU_l2NEhqPyR6k4LKckb2Ts6vv15tczMskiHLCKC3hQYpkIvcB1CKOTMNSKKAAUUNPydKdcSnQ99-XpMPIc_6M7EfISI-nGD8nj1z3gjyZRCT_viTmdCslSHtPG5xI8wvqeUcbPVLfrv842Cz7BV0t-wFjQgGown1GqjtL-7uWDrpd0KHV0zKkbqRwqcVd4KOmIxi8IjfnZz9PL1hUTmB1LviKSZ5Y6S1qT7lK5jqrnQbfJZVzGjCaKW1ZZUZy7ouAULjOKpfa3FsHCMFL_prMur5zbwhNIHxgUHpjCpH40iSyMlDGpLxA4epsTr5s_KbqSCuO6hatgvICHa1Mo9JSoaMVOnpOPm9PGCZGjftNTzAQWzOkwg47-mWj4pulioLbynBuha0Fsis6XnsLKAfay30u5uQDhlEh2UWHs2kavR5HdfnjWh1LSPe8lBWfk0_RyPfw9LWOixPAB8iPtWN5uGMJb2O9e3jTW1TMBqP633cPHj78ljzFdoc5buKQzFbLtXsHoGdl3see_Q8aGPzM
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Comparison of greenhouse gas fluxes from tropical forests and oil palm plantations on mineral soil
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2496062951
https://doaj.org/article/773d9b33d4dc44379e3cfd0152903f54
Volume 18
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Na9wwEBVtSqGXko-WbpMsIhSaixvbkmXrmIRs0x5CyQfkJiRLcgNee1nvQvPvMyN7l-wh9JKTwR7b8miseQOj9wj5lnvNMu_zSOjYRTzxMkJtq4h7ppOkFCJzge3zSlze8d_32f0zqS_sCevpgXvHneQ5s9IwZrktOZLnOVZ6C0kslTHzWWAChZy3Kqb6NZgVcRDjhOwsYAB53JP6AFrhJ6aKEiicAElDhKTJRj4KtP0vLc4h40y2yccBKtLTfog75I1rdsn7XjzycY-Y87WEIG09rbCB5i_U8Y5WuqO-Xv5zcJi3U7qYtzOcCwoAFd7TUd1Y2j7UdKbrKZ3Vut9-1HQUHjV9CDzUtAODT-RucnF7fhkNiglRmXG2iASLrfAWNaecFJlOS6cFOEo6pwGbmcIWMjWCMZ8HZMJ0Kl1iM28dIAMv2Gey1bSN-0JoDNMGBoU3JuexL0wspIHyJWE5ClanI_Jj5TdVDnTiqGpRKygr0NHKVCopFDpaoaNH5Hh9w6xn0njZ9AwnYm2GFNjhBASGGgJD_S8wRuQIp1EhyUWDXTSVXnad-nVzrU4FLPOsEJKNyPfByLcw-lIPmxLAB8iLtWF5sGEJf2G5eXkVLWpYBToFpS3UhymA2K-v8UX75AN6J3TA8QOytZgv3SFAooUZk7fF5OeYvDu7uPpzPQ7_whiTVPYEnIcGuw
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Pb9MwFLbGEIIL4qcoDLAQCC5hSew4yQGhMSgtGzvAJu3m2bEdJrVJaFrB_in-Rt5zkqIexm2nSM2rEz8_-32vtb-PkJepUyxxLg2ECm3AI5cHqG0VcMdUFBVCJNazfR6JyQn_cpqcbpE_w1kY3FY5rIl-oTZ1gb-R70KZAFg7BkDwvvkZoGoU_rs6SGh0YXFgL35Byda-m36E8X0Vx-NPx_uToFcVCIqEs2UgWGiEM6jLZHORqLiwCtoNc2sV4BedmSyPtWDMpT57MxXnNjKJMxaypxMM2r1GrnMGmRxPpo8_Dys_y0IvAQpNC-h2GnZUQoCR-K4ugwjKNcDvEJdxtJEFvVjAZSnB57nxHXK7B6h0r4uou2TLVvfIjU6y8uI-0ftr4UJaO1ritp0f9aq1tFQtdbPVbwuXRT2ny0XdYARQgMXwnJaqytD6fEYbNZvTZqa6Q09VS6Gp-blnv6YtGDwgJ1fi0Ydku6or-4jQEIIFDDKndcpDl-lQ5BqKpoilKJMdj8jbwW-y6EnMUUtjJqGYQUdLXcook-hoiY4ekTfrLzQdf8flph9wINZmSLztP6gXpeznsUxTZnLNmOGm4MjlaFnhDGAq6C9zCR-RFziMEqk1Kty7U6pV28rp929yT0ByYZnI2Yi87o1cDW9fqP4oBPgA2bg2LHc2LGHuF5u3h2iR_drTyn8z5fH_bz8nNyfHXw_l4fTo4Am5hT7wu-v4DtleLlb2KcCtpX7mY5ySs6ueVH8Bftc3pQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lj9MwEB4tXYG4IJ6isICFQHAJTeLESQ4I7VNbFlWrhZX2ZuzYDiu1SWlawf41fh0zeRT1sNz2VKmZ2unnsWcmsb8P4E3iFI-dSzyhfOtFgcs80rbyIsdVEORCxLZh-5yI4_Po80V8sQV_-rMwtK2yXxObhdpUOT0jH2GZgLl2iAnByHXbIk4Pjj7Nf3qkIEVvWns5jdZFTuzVLyzf6o_jAxzrt2F4dPht_9jrFAa8PI740hPcN8IZ0miymYhVmFuFffiZtQpzGZ2aNAu14NwlTSTnKsxsYGJnLEZSJzi2ewu2E6qKBrC9dzg5PevjAE_9RhAUGxcIQuK3xEKYMUUjXXgBFm-YzaOXhsFGTGykA64LEE3UO7oP97p0le22_vUAtmz5EG63ApZXj0Dvr2UMWeVYQZt4flSr2rJC1cxNV78tfiyqGVsuqjn5A8MkGfupmSoNqy6nbK6mMzafqvYIVFkzbGp22XBhsxoNHsP5jWD6BAZlVdqnwHx0HTRIndYIsUu1LzKNJVTAExLNDofwocdN5h2lOSlrTCWWNgS01IUMUklASwJ6CO_XP5i3bB7Xm-7RQKzNiIa7-aJaFLKb1TJJuMk05yYyeUTMjpbnzmCGhf-XuzgawmsaRklEGyW5bKFWdS3HX8_krsBQw1OR8SG864xchXefq-5gBGJA3FwbljsblrgS5JuXe2-R3UpUy3_z5tn_L7-COzih5Jfx5OQ53CUImq120Q4MlouVfYG511K_7Jycwfebnld_AXScPTc
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+greenhouse+gas+fluxes+from+tropical+forests+and+oil+palm+plantations+on+mineral+soil&rft.jtitle=Biogeosciences&rft.au=Drewer%2C+Julia&rft.au=Leduning%2C+Melissa+M&rft.au=Griffiths%2C+Robert+I&rft.au=Goodall%2C+Tim&rft.date=2021-03-04&rft.pub=Copernicus+GmbH&rft.issn=1726-4170&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1559&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194%2Fbg-18-1559-2021&rft.externalDocID=A653838693
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1726-4189&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1726-4189&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1726-4189&client=summon