Comparison of greenhouse gas fluxes from tropical forests and oil palm plantations on mineral soil
In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes remains highly uncertain, mainly due to a relatively small pool of available data. The aim of this study is to quantify differences of nitrous oxid...
Saved in:
Published in | Biogeosciences Vol. 18; no. 5; pp. 1559 - 1575 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Katlenburg-Lindau
Copernicus GmbH
04.03.2021
Copernicus Publications |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced
tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas
(GHG) fluxes remains highly uncertain, mainly due to a relatively small pool
of available data. The aim of this study is to quantify differences of
nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) fluxes as well as soil
carbon dioxide (CO2) respiration rates from logged forests, oil palm
plantations of different ages, and an adjacent small riparian area. Nitrous
oxide fluxes are the focus of this study, as these emissions are expected to
increase significantly due to the nitrogen (N) fertilizer application in the
plantations. This study was conducted in the SAFE (Stability of Altered
Forest Ecosystems) landscape in Malaysian Borneo (Sabah) with measurements
every 2 months over a 2-year period. GHG fluxes were measured by static
chambers together with key soil physicochemical parameters and microbial
biodiversity. At all sites, N2O fluxes were spatially and temporally
highly variable. On average the largest fluxes (incl. 95 % CI) were measured
from OP plantations (45.1 (24.0–78.5) µg m−2 h−1 N2O-N), slightly smaller fluxes from the riparian area (29.4 (2.8–84.7) µg m−2 h−1 N2O-N), and the smallest fluxes from logged forests
(16.0 (4.0–36.3) µg m−2 h−1 N2O-N). Methane fluxes
were generally small (mean ± SD): −2.6 ± 17.2 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1 for OP and 1.3 ± 12.6 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1 for riparian, with the range of measured CH4 fluxes
being largest in logged forests (2.2 ± 48.3 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1). Soil respiration rates were larger from riparian areas
(157.7 ± 106 mg m−2 h−1 CO2-C) and logged forests
(137.4 ± 95 mg m−2 h−1 CO2-C) than OP plantations
(93.3 ± 70 mg m−2 h−1 CO2-C) as a result of larger
amounts of decomposing leaf litter. Microbial communities were distinctly
different between the different land-use types and sites. Bacterial
communities were linked to soil pH, and fungal and eukaryotic communities were linked to
land use. Despite measuring a large number of environmental parameters,
mixed models could only explain up to 17 % of the variance of measured
fluxes for N2O, 3 % of CH4, and 25 % of soil respiration.
Scaling up measured N2O fluxes to Sabah using land areas for forest and
OP resulted in emissions increasing from 7.6 Mt (95 % confidence interval,
−3.0–22.3 Mt) yr−1 in 1973 to 11.4 Mt (0.2–28.6 Mt) yr−1 in 2015 due
to the increasing area of forest converted to OP plantations over the last
∼ 40 years. |
---|---|
AbstractList | In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes remains highly uncertain, mainly due to a relatively small pool of available data. The aim of this study is to quantify differences of nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) fluxes as well as soil carbon dioxide (CO2) respiration rates from logged forests, oil palm plantations of different ages, and an adjacent small riparian area. Nitrous oxide fluxes are the focus of this study, as these emissions are expected to increase significantly due to the nitrogen (N) fertilizer application in the plantations. This study was conducted in the SAFE (Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems) landscape in Malaysian Borneo (Sabah) with measurements every 2 months over a 2-year period. GHG fluxes were measured by static chambers together with key soil physicochemical parameters and microbial biodiversity. At all sites, N2O fluxes were spatially and temporally highly variable. On average the largest fluxes (incl. 95 % CI) were measured from OP plantations (45.1 (24.0–78.5) µg m-2 h-1 N2O-N), slightly smaller fluxes from the riparian area (29.4 (2.8–84.7) µg m-2 h-1 N2O-N), and the smallest fluxes from logged forests (16.0 (4.0–36.3) µg m-2 h-1 N2O-N). Methane fluxes were generally small (mean ± SD): -2.6 ± 17.2 µg CH4-C m-2 h-1 for OP and 1.3 ± 12.6 µg CH4-C m-2 h-1 for riparian, with the range of measured CH4 fluxes being largest in logged forests (2.2 ± 48.3 µg CH4-C m-2 h-1). Soil respiration rates were larger from riparian areas (157.7 ± 106 mg m-2 h-1 CO2-C) and logged forests (137.4 ± 95 mg m-2 h-1 CO2-C) than OP plantations (93.3 ± 70 mg m-2 h-1 CO2-C) as a result of larger amounts of decomposing leaf litter. Microbial communities were distinctly different between the different land-use types and sites. Bacterial communities were linked to soil pH, and fungal and eukaryotic communities were linked to land use. Despite measuring a large number of environmental parameters, mixed models could only explain up to 17 % of the variance of measured fluxes for N2O, 3 % of CH4, and 25 % of soil respiration. Scaling up measured N2O fluxes to Sabah using land areas for forest and OP resulted in emissions increasing from 7.6 Mt (95 % confidence interval,-3.0–22.3 Mt) yr-1 in 1973 to 11.4 Mt (0.2–28.6 Mt) yr-1 in 2015 due to the increasing area of forest converted to OP plantations over the last∼ 40 years. In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes remains highly uncertain, mainly due to a relatively small pool of available data. The aim of this study is to quantify differences of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) and methane (CH 4 ) fluxes as well as soil carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) respiration rates from logged forests, oil palm plantations of different ages, and an adjacent small riparian area. Nitrous oxide fluxes are the focus of this study, as these emissions are expected to increase significantly due to the nitrogen (N) fertilizer application in the plantations. This study was conducted in the SAFE (Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems) landscape in Malaysian Borneo (Sabah) with measurements every 2 months over a 2-year period. GHG fluxes were measured by static chambers together with key soil physicochemical parameters and microbial biodiversity. At all sites, N 2 O fluxes were spatially and temporally highly variable. On average the largest fluxes (incl. 95 % CI) were measured from OP plantations (45.1 (24.0–78.5) µ g m −2 h −1 N 2 O-N), slightly smaller fluxes from the riparian area (29.4 (2.8–84.7) µ g m −2 h −1 N 2 O-N), and the smallest fluxes from logged forests (16.0 (4.0–36.3) µ g m −2 h −1 N 2 O-N). Methane fluxes were generally small (mean ± SD): − 2.6 ± 17.2 µ g CH 4 -C m −2 h −1 for OP and 1.3 ± 12.6 µ g CH 4 -C m −2 h −1 for riparian, with the range of measured CH 4 fluxes being largest in logged forests (2.2 ± 48.3 µ g CH 4 -C m −2 h −1 ). Soil respiration rates were larger from riparian areas (157.7 ± 106 mg m −2 h −1 CO 2 -C) and logged forests (137.4 ± 95 mg m −2 h −1 CO 2 -C) than OP plantations (93.3 ± 70 mg m −2 h −1 CO 2 -C) as a result of larger amounts of decomposing leaf litter. Microbial communities were distinctly different between the different land-use types and sites. Bacterial communities were linked to soil pH, and fungal and eukaryotic communities were linked to land use. Despite measuring a large number of environmental parameters, mixed models could only explain up to 17 % of the variance of measured fluxes for N 2 O, 3 % of CH 4 , and 25 % of soil respiration. Scaling up measured N 2 O fluxes to Sabah using land areas for forest and OP resulted in emissions increasing from 7.6 Mt (95 % confidence interval, − 3.0–22.3 Mt) yr −1 in 1973 to 11.4 Mt (0.2–28.6 Mt) yr −1 in 2015 due to the increasing area of forest converted to OP plantations over the last ∼ 40 years. In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes remains highly uncertain, mainly due to a relatively small pool of available data. The aim of this study is to quantify differences of nitrous oxide (N.sub.2 O) and methane (CH.sub.4) fluxes as well as soil carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) respiration rates from logged forests, oil palm plantations of different ages, and an adjacent small riparian area. Nitrous oxide fluxes are the focus of this study, as these emissions are expected to increase significantly due to the nitrogen (N) fertilizer application in the plantations. This study was conducted in the SAFE (Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems) landscape in Malaysian Borneo (Sabah) with measurements every 2 months over a 2-year period. GHG fluxes were measured by static chambers together with key soil physicochemical parameters and microbial biodiversity. At all sites, N.sub.2 O fluxes were spatially and temporally highly variable. On average the largest fluxes (incl. 95 % CI) were measured from OP plantations (45.1 (24.0-78.5) µg m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 N.sub.2 O-N), slightly smaller fluxes from the riparian area (29.4 (2.8-84.7) µg m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 N.sub.2 O-N), and the smallest fluxes from logged forests (16.0 (4.0-36.3) µg m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 N.sub.2 O-N). Methane fluxes were generally small (mean ± SD): -2.6 ± 17.2 µg CH.sub.4 -C m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 for OP and 1.3 ± 12.6 µg CH.sub.4 -C m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 for riparian, with the range of measured CH.sub.4 fluxes being largest in logged forests (2.2 ± 48.3 µg CH.sub.4 -C m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1). Soil respiration rates were larger from riparian areas (157.7 ± 106 mg m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 CO.sub.2 -C) and logged forests (137.4 ± 95 mg m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 CO.sub.2 -C) than OP plantations (93.3 ± 70 mg m.sup.-2 h.sup.-1 CO.sub.2 -C) as a result of larger amounts of decomposing leaf litter. Microbial communities were distinctly different between the different land-use types and sites. Bacterial communities were linked to soil pH, and fungal and eukaryotic communities were linked to land use. Despite measuring a large number of environmental parameters, mixed models could only explain up to 17 % of the variance of measured fluxes for N.sub.2 O, 3 % of CH.sub.4, and 25 % of soil respiration. Scaling up measured N.sub.2 O fluxes to Sabah using land areas for forest and OP resulted in emissions increasing from 7.6 Mt (95 % confidence interval, -3.0-22.3 Mt) yr.sup.-1 in 1973 to 11.4 Mt (0.2-28.6 Mt) yr.sup.-1 in 2015 due to the increasing area of forest converted to OP plantations over the last â¼ 40 years. In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes remains highly uncertain, mainly due to a relatively small pool of available data. The aim of this study is to quantify differences of nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) fluxes as well as soil carbon dioxide (CO2) respiration rates from logged forests, oil palm plantations of different ages, and an adjacent small riparian area. Nitrous oxide fluxes are the focus of this study, as these emissions are expected to increase significantly due to the nitrogen (N) fertilizer application in the plantations. This study was conducted in the SAFE (Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems) landscape in Malaysian Borneo (Sabah) with measurements every 2 months over a 2-year period. GHG fluxes were measured by static chambers together with key soil physicochemical parameters and microbial biodiversity. At all sites, N2O fluxes were spatially and temporally highly variable. On average the largest fluxes (incl. 95 % CI) were measured from OP plantations (45.1 (24.0–78.5) µg m−2 h−1 N2O-N), slightly smaller fluxes from the riparian area (29.4 (2.8–84.7) µg m−2 h−1 N2O-N), and the smallest fluxes from logged forests (16.0 (4.0–36.3) µg m−2 h−1 N2O-N). Methane fluxes were generally small (mean ± SD): −2.6 ± 17.2 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1 for OP and 1.3 ± 12.6 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1 for riparian, with the range of measured CH4 fluxes being largest in logged forests (2.2 ± 48.3 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1). Soil respiration rates were larger from riparian areas (157.7 ± 106 mg m−2 h−1 CO2-C) and logged forests (137.4 ± 95 mg m−2 h−1 CO2-C) than OP plantations (93.3 ± 70 mg m−2 h−1 CO2-C) as a result of larger amounts of decomposing leaf litter. Microbial communities were distinctly different between the different land-use types and sites. Bacterial communities were linked to soil pH, and fungal and eukaryotic communities were linked to land use. Despite measuring a large number of environmental parameters, mixed models could only explain up to 17 % of the variance of measured fluxes for N2O, 3 % of CH4, and 25 % of soil respiration. Scaling up measured N2O fluxes to Sabah using land areas for forest and OP resulted in emissions increasing from 7.6 Mt (95 % confidence interval, −3.0–22.3 Mt) yr−1 in 1973 to 11.4 Mt (0.2–28.6 Mt) yr−1 in 2015 due to the increasing area of forest converted to OP plantations over the last ∼ 40 years. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Sentian, Justin Leduning, Melissa M. Cowan, Nicholas Skiba, Ute M. Comynn-Platt, Edward Griffiths, Robert I. Levy, Peter E. Hayman, Garry Drewer, Julia Goodall, Tim Majalap, Noreen |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Julia orcidid: 0000-0002-6263-6341 surname: Drewer fullname: Drewer, Julia – sequence: 2 givenname: Melissa M. surname: Leduning fullname: Leduning, Melissa M. – sequence: 3 givenname: Robert I. orcidid: 0000-0002-3341-4547 surname: Griffiths fullname: Griffiths, Robert I. – sequence: 4 givenname: Tim orcidid: 0000-0002-1526-4071 surname: Goodall fullname: Goodall, Tim – sequence: 5 givenname: Peter E. orcidid: 0000-0002-8505-1901 surname: Levy fullname: Levy, Peter E. – sequence: 6 givenname: Nicholas surname: Cowan fullname: Cowan, Nicholas – sequence: 7 givenname: Edward orcidid: 0000-0001-7821-4998 surname: Comynn-Platt fullname: Comynn-Platt, Edward – sequence: 8 givenname: Garry orcidid: 0000-0003-3825-4156 surname: Hayman fullname: Hayman, Garry – sequence: 9 givenname: Justin orcidid: 0000-0002-7121-2372 surname: Sentian fullname: Sentian, Justin – sequence: 10 givenname: Noreen surname: Majalap fullname: Majalap, Noreen – sequence: 11 givenname: Ute M. surname: Skiba fullname: Skiba, Ute M. |
BookMark | eNp1kktr3DAUhUVJocm0624FXXXhRLIsWVqGoY-BQKGPtbjWw9VgS67kgfTfR9MpSae0aHHF5TtH56J7hS5iig6h15Rcc6q6m2FsqGwo56ppSUufoUvat6LpqFQXf9xfoKtS9oQwSSS_RMM2zQvkUFLEyeMxOxe_p0NxeISC_XS4d7XkNOM1pyUYmLBP2ZW1YIgWpzDhBaYZLxPEFdaQYsHVag7R5cqWCrxEzz1Mxb36XTfo2_t3X7cfm7tPH3bb27vG8I6tjWDECm9rUOmU4NAaB6JVRDkHhHeDtFK1g2DM94IpxRi0ylHLvXWSKi_YBu1OvjbBXi85zJB_6gRB_2qkPGrIazCT033PrBoYs501Xcd65ZjxllBe32O-xtmgNyevJacfhzqu3qdDjjW-bjslSA3G6RM1QjUN0ac1g5lDMfpWcCaZFDXnBl3_g6rHujmY-ok-1P6Z4O2ZoDKru19HOJSid18-n7M3J9bkVEp2_nFwSvRxL_Qwair1cS_0cS-qgv-lMOH0czVWmP6rewARxLvt |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_171850 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00248_021_01908_3 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0295157 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2025_109603 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3967094 crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2024_1441266 crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2021_738303 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_21_513_2024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2022_107953 crossref_primary_10_1002_ppp3_10621 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pstr_0000023 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11676_022_01493_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2024_110866 crossref_primary_10_2965_jwet_22_133 crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2024_1324475 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.agee.2015.08.022 10.3390/agriculture8090133 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02616.x 10.1128/AEM.02541-13 10.1029/2006GB002909 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00322.x 10.1029/2006GB002734 10.1007/s10533-013-9908-3 10.5194/bg-10-5367-2013 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.01.010 10.1002/bit.20347 10.1371/journal.pone.0133325 10.1111/mec.13620 10.1007/s13593-016-0353-2 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125012 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00004 10.5194/bg-13-5433-2016 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0667:TACMOS]2.0.CO;2 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.019 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.06.006 10.5194/bg-16-785-2019 10.1007/s00374-019-01421-3 10.1128/AEM.01043-13 10.1111/gcb.14068 10.5194/bg-12-5831-2015 10.1007/s11104-016-3023-x 10.1038/s41467-020-14852-6 10.1007/s10705-004-0382-0 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 10.1080/00380768.2014.960355 10.21894/jopr.2019.0046 10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.006 10.1098/rstb.2011.0049 10.1111/gcb.12907 10.1128/aem.59.3.695-700.1993 10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.04.004 10.3354/ame041091 10.3389/ffgc.2019.00090 10.1111/1365-2664.13280 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.016 10.1038/srep32017 10.1186/s13021-017-0072-2 10.1007/s00248-017-1043-6 10.1038/nmeth.3869 10.5194/bg-12-7299-2015 10.5194/bg-14-2781-2017 10.1016/j.gfs.2012.10.003 10.1038/543306a 10.1007/s10668-006-9080-1 10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.005 10.1007/s00248-012-0028-8 10.1111/ejss.12432 10.1007/s12155-017-9824-9 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01437.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2021 Copernicus GmbH 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 Copernicus GmbH – notice: 2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION ISR 7QO 7SN 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO F1W FR3 GNUQQ H95 H96 HCIFZ KL. L.G L6V LK8 M7N M7P M7S P64 PATMY PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS PYCSY DOA |
DOI | 10.5194/bg-18-1559-2021 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Gale in Context: Science Biotechnology Research Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Continental Europe Database Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database ProQuest Central Student Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources SciTech Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest Engineering Collection Biological Sciences Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database ProQuest Engineering Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Database Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection Environmental Science Collection DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Natural Science Collection Biological Science Collection Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources ProQuest Central (New) Engineering Collection Engineering Database ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Technology Collection Continental Europe Database Biological Science Database Ecology Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Engineering Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts ProQuest Central Korea Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Materials Science & Engineering Collection |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology |
EISSN | 1726-4189 |
EndPage | 1575 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_773d9b33d4dc44379e3cfd0152903f54 A653838693 10_5194_bg_18_1559_2021 |
GeographicLocations | Southeast Asia Borneo Malaysia |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Borneo – name: Malaysia – name: Southeast Asia |
GroupedDBID | 23N 2WC 2XV 4P2 5GY 5VS 7XC 8FE 8FG 8FH 8R4 8R5 AAFWJ AAYXX ABJCF ABUWG ADBBV AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AHGZY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ATCPS BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR BPHCQ CCPQU CITATION E3Z EBD EBS EDH EJD GROUPED_DOAJ H13 HCIFZ HH5 IAO IEA ISR ITC KQ8 L6V L8X LK5 LK8 M7P M7R M7S MM- M~E OK1 OVT P2P PATMY PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PTHSS PYCSY Q2X RKB RNS TR2 XSB ~02 BBORY PMFND 7QO 7SN 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD AZQEC C1K DWQXO F1W FR3 GNUQQ H95 H96 KL. L.G M7N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-630d6fd1728e965a2cea62909eea054b8d892b633f7639933a29e1d5fde819f63 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1726-4189 1726-4170 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:16:16 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:03:25 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:28:15 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:28:35 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 04:19:28 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:01:49 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:12 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c543t-630d6fd1728e965a2cea62909eea054b8d892b633f7639933a29e1d5fde819f63 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-6263-6341 0000-0002-3341-4547 0000-0002-1526-4071 0000-0001-7821-4998 0000-0003-3825-4156 0000-0002-7121-2372 0000-0002-8505-1901 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/773d9b33d4dc44379e3cfd0152903f54 |
PQID | 2496062951 |
PQPubID | 105740 |
PageCount | 17 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_773d9b33d4dc44379e3cfd0152903f54 proquest_journals_2496062951 gale_infotracmisc_A653838693 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A653838693 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A653838693 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_18_1559_2021 crossref_citationtrail_10_5194_bg_18_1559_2021 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-03-04 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-03-04 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2021 text: 2021-03-04 day: 04 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Katlenburg-Lindau |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Katlenburg-Lindau |
PublicationTitle | Biogeosciences |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Copernicus GmbH Copernicus Publications |
Publisher_xml | – name: Copernicus GmbH – name: Copernicus Publications |
References | ref13 ref57 ref12 ref56 ref15 ref59 ref14 ref58 ref53 ref52 ref11 ref55 ref10 ref54 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref51 ref50 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 ref35 ref34 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref33 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref39 ref38 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref29 |
References_xml | – ident: ref37 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.08.022 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.3390/agriculture8090133 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02616.x – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02541-13 – ident: ref55 doi: 10.1029/2006GB002909 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00322.x – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1029/2006GB002734 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1007/s10533-013-9908-3 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.5194/bg-10-5367-2013 – ident: ref58 doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.01.010 – ident: ref59 doi: 10.1002/bit.20347 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133325 – ident: ref51 doi: 10.1111/mec.13620 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1007/s13593-016-0353-2 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125012 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00004 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.5194/bg-13-5433-2016 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0667:TACMOS]2.0.CO;2 – ident: ref47 doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.019 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.06.006 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.5194/bg-16-785-2019 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1007/s00374-019-01421-3 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1128/AEM.01043-13 – ident: ref43 doi: 10.1111/gcb.14068 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.5194/bg-12-5831-2015 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-3023-x – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14852-6 – ident: ref12 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1007/s10705-004-0382-0 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.1080/00380768.2014.960355 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.21894/jopr.2019.0046 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.006 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0049 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1111/gcb.12907 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1128/aem.59.3.695-700.1993 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.04.004 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.3354/ame041091 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2019.00090 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13280 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.016 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1038/srep32017 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1186/s13021-017-0072-2 – ident: ref49 doi: 10.1007/s00248-017-1043-6 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.5194/bg-12-7299-2015 – ident: ref4 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.5194/bg-14-2781-2017 – ident: ref45 doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2012.10.003 – ident: ref57 doi: 10.1038/543306a – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1007/s10668-006-9080-1 – ident: ref42 – ident: ref56 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.005 – ident: ref52 – ident: ref50 doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0028-8 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1111/ejss.12432 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1007/s12155-017-9824-9 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01437.x |
SSID | ssj0038085 |
Score | 2.405739 |
Snippet | In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced
tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas
(GHG) fluxes... In Southeast Asia, oil palm (OP) plantations have largely replaced tropical forests. The impact of this shift in land use on greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes... |
SourceID | doaj proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 1559 |
SubjectTerms | Air pollution Biodiversity Carbon Carbon content Carbon dioxide Climate change Comparative analysis Confidence intervals Emissions Environment models Environmental factors Environmental parameters Fertilizer application Fertilizers Fluxes Forest ecosystems Forest soils Forests Forests and forestry Greenhouse gases Land degradation Land use Leaf litter Methane Microbial activity Microorganisms Nitrogen Nitrous oxide Oil Parameters Peatlands Physicochemical processes Physicochemical properties Plantations Respiration Soil Soil chemistry Soil fertility Soil microbiology Soil pH Soil respiration Soils Stability Terrestrial ecosystems Tropical climate Tropical forests Vegetable oils |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Na9wwEBXthkIvoZ9007SIUmgvamxLlu1TSUJC0kMoaQO5CcmS3IDXdte70P77zsjaLXtITgZ7_KEZefTGlt4j5GPhNc-9L5jUiWMi9RVDbSsmPNdpWkuZu8D2eSUvbsS32_w2fnAb47TKTU4Midr2NX4jP4IyAbB2BoDg6_CboWoU_l2NEhqPyR6k4LKckb2Ts6vv15tczMskiHLCKC3hQYpkIvcB1CKOTMNSKKAAUUNPydKdcSnQ99-XpMPIc_6M7EfISI-nGD8nj1z3gjyZRCT_viTmdCslSHtPG5xI8wvqeUcbPVLfrv842Cz7BV0t-wFjQgGown1GqjtL-7uWDrpd0KHV0zKkbqRwqcVd4KOmIxi8IjfnZz9PL1hUTmB1LviKSZ5Y6S1qT7lK5jqrnQbfJZVzGjCaKW1ZZUZy7ouAULjOKpfa3FsHCMFL_prMur5zbwhNIHxgUHpjCpH40iSyMlDGpLxA4epsTr5s_KbqSCuO6hatgvICHa1Mo9JSoaMVOnpOPm9PGCZGjftNTzAQWzOkwg47-mWj4pulioLbynBuha0Fsis6XnsLKAfay30u5uQDhlEh2UWHs2kavR5HdfnjWh1LSPe8lBWfk0_RyPfw9LWOixPAB8iPtWN5uGMJb2O9e3jTW1TMBqP633cPHj78ljzFdoc5buKQzFbLtXsHoGdl3see_Q8aGPzM priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Comparison of greenhouse gas fluxes from tropical forests and oil palm plantations on mineral soil |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2496062951 https://doaj.org/article/773d9b33d4dc44379e3cfd0152903f54 |
Volume | 18 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Na9wwEBVtSqGXko-WbpMsIhSaixvbkmXrmIRs0x5CyQfkJiRLcgNee1nvQvPvMyN7l-wh9JKTwR7b8miseQOj9wj5lnvNMu_zSOjYRTzxMkJtq4h7ppOkFCJzge3zSlze8d_32f0zqS_sCevpgXvHneQ5s9IwZrktOZLnOVZ6C0kslTHzWWAChZy3Kqb6NZgVcRDjhOwsYAB53JP6AFrhJ6aKEiicAElDhKTJRj4KtP0vLc4h40y2yccBKtLTfog75I1rdsn7XjzycY-Y87WEIG09rbCB5i_U8Y5WuqO-Xv5zcJi3U7qYtzOcCwoAFd7TUd1Y2j7UdKbrKZ3Vut9-1HQUHjV9CDzUtAODT-RucnF7fhkNiglRmXG2iASLrfAWNaecFJlOS6cFOEo6pwGbmcIWMjWCMZ8HZMJ0Kl1iM28dIAMv2Gey1bSN-0JoDNMGBoU3JuexL0wspIHyJWE5ClanI_Jj5TdVDnTiqGpRKygr0NHKVCopFDpaoaNH5Hh9w6xn0njZ9AwnYm2GFNjhBASGGgJD_S8wRuQIp1EhyUWDXTSVXnad-nVzrU4FLPOsEJKNyPfByLcw-lIPmxLAB8iLtWF5sGEJf2G5eXkVLWpYBToFpS3UhymA2K-v8UX75AN6J3TA8QOytZgv3SFAooUZk7fF5OeYvDu7uPpzPQ7_whiTVPYEnIcGuw |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Pb9MwFLbGEIIL4qcoDLAQCC5hSew4yQGhMSgtGzvAJu3m2bEdJrVJaFrB_in-Rt5zkqIexm2nSM2rEz8_-32vtb-PkJepUyxxLg2ECm3AI5cHqG0VcMdUFBVCJNazfR6JyQn_cpqcbpE_w1kY3FY5rIl-oTZ1gb-R70KZAFg7BkDwvvkZoGoU_rs6SGh0YXFgL35Byda-m36E8X0Vx-NPx_uToFcVCIqEs2UgWGiEM6jLZHORqLiwCtoNc2sV4BedmSyPtWDMpT57MxXnNjKJMxaypxMM2r1GrnMGmRxPpo8_Dys_y0IvAQpNC-h2GnZUQoCR-K4ugwjKNcDvEJdxtJEFvVjAZSnB57nxHXK7B6h0r4uou2TLVvfIjU6y8uI-0ftr4UJaO1ritp0f9aq1tFQtdbPVbwuXRT2ny0XdYARQgMXwnJaqytD6fEYbNZvTZqa6Q09VS6Gp-blnv6YtGDwgJ1fi0Ydku6or-4jQEIIFDDKndcpDl-lQ5BqKpoilKJMdj8jbwW-y6EnMUUtjJqGYQUdLXcook-hoiY4ekTfrLzQdf8flph9wINZmSLztP6gXpeznsUxTZnLNmOGm4MjlaFnhDGAq6C9zCR-RFziMEqk1Kty7U6pV28rp929yT0ByYZnI2Yi87o1cDW9fqP4oBPgA2bg2LHc2LGHuF5u3h2iR_drTyn8z5fH_bz8nNyfHXw_l4fTo4Am5hT7wu-v4DtleLlb2KcCtpX7mY5ySs6ueVH8Bftc3pQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lj9MwEB4tXYG4IJ6isICFQHAJTeLESQ4I7VNbFlWrhZX2ZuzYDiu1SWlawf41fh0zeRT1sNz2VKmZ2unnsWcmsb8P4E3iFI-dSzyhfOtFgcs80rbyIsdVEORCxLZh-5yI4_Po80V8sQV_-rMwtK2yXxObhdpUOT0jH2GZgLl2iAnByHXbIk4Pjj7Nf3qkIEVvWns5jdZFTuzVLyzf6o_jAxzrt2F4dPht_9jrFAa8PI740hPcN8IZ0miymYhVmFuFffiZtQpzGZ2aNAu14NwlTSTnKsxsYGJnLEZSJzi2ewu2E6qKBrC9dzg5PevjAE_9RhAUGxcIQuK3xEKYMUUjXXgBFm-YzaOXhsFGTGykA64LEE3UO7oP97p0le22_vUAtmz5EG63ApZXj0Dvr2UMWeVYQZt4flSr2rJC1cxNV78tfiyqGVsuqjn5A8MkGfupmSoNqy6nbK6mMzafqvYIVFkzbGp22XBhsxoNHsP5jWD6BAZlVdqnwHx0HTRIndYIsUu1LzKNJVTAExLNDofwocdN5h2lOSlrTCWWNgS01IUMUklASwJ6CO_XP5i3bB7Xm-7RQKzNiIa7-aJaFLKb1TJJuMk05yYyeUTMjpbnzmCGhf-XuzgawmsaRklEGyW5bKFWdS3HX8_krsBQw1OR8SG864xchXefq-5gBGJA3FwbljsblrgS5JuXe2-R3UpUy3_z5tn_L7-COzih5Jfx5OQ53CUImq120Q4MlouVfYG511K_7Jycwfebnld_AXScPTc |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+greenhouse+gas+fluxes+from+tropical+forests+and+oil+palm+plantations+on+mineral+soil&rft.jtitle=Biogeosciences&rft.au=Drewer%2C+Julia&rft.au=Leduning%2C+Melissa+M&rft.au=Griffiths%2C+Robert+I&rft.au=Goodall%2C+Tim&rft.date=2021-03-04&rft.pub=Copernicus+GmbH&rft.issn=1726-4170&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1559&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194%2Fbg-18-1559-2021&rft.externalDocID=A653838693 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1726-4189&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1726-4189&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1726-4189&client=summon |