The Valuation Differences Between Stock Option and Restricted Stock Grants for US Firms
: In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option‐based compensation to restricted stock‐based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of business finance & accounting Vol. 38; no. 3-4; pp. 395 - 412 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.04.2011
Wiley Blackwell |
Series | Journal of Business Finance & Accounting |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | : In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option‐based compensation to restricted stock‐based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate cross‐sectional valuation equations that include the value of stock option and restricted stock grants summed over the current and past two years, residual income, and book value of equity, after controlling for endogeneity. Consistent with prior research, our findings indicate that the market on average values stock option grants positively. However, in contrast to stock option grants, restricted stock grants are valued negatively. This result is consistent with restricted stock grants lacking the positive incentive effects of stock options and being viewed as a liability or expense to the firm. |
---|---|
AbstractList | In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option-based compensation to restricted stock-based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate cross-sectional valuation equations that include the value of stock option and restricted stock grants summed over the current and past two years, residual income, and book value of equity, after controlling for endogeneity. Consistent with prior research, our findings indicate that the market on average values stock option grants positively. However, in contrast to stock option grants, restricted stock grants are valued negatively. This result is consistent with restricted stock grants lacking the positive incentive effects of stock options and being viewed as a liability or expense to the firm. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option‐based compensation to restricted stock‐based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate cross‐sectional valuation equations that include the value of stock option and restricted stock grants summed over the current and past two years, residual income, and book value of equity, after controlling for endogeneity. Consistent with prior research, our findings indicate that the market on average values stock option grants positively. However, in contrast to stock option grants, restricted stock grants are valued negatively. This result is consistent with restricted stock grants lacking the positive incentive effects of stock options and being viewed as a liability or expense to the firm. In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option-based compensation to restricted stock-based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate cross-sectional valuation equations that include the value of stock option and restricted stock grants summed over the current and past two years, residual income, and book value of equity, after controlling for endogeneity. Consistent with prior research, our findings indicate that the market on average values stock option grants positively. However, in contrast to stock option grants, restricted stock grants are valued negatively. This result is consistent with restricted stock grants lacking the positive incentive effects of stock options and being viewed as a liability or expense to the firm. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] : In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option‐based compensation to restricted stock‐based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate cross‐sectional valuation equations that include the value of stock option and restricted stock grants summed over the current and past two years, residual income, and book value of equity, after controlling for endogeneity. Consistent with prior research, our findings indicate that the market on average values stock option grants positively. However, in contrast to stock option grants, restricted stock grants are valued negatively. This result is consistent with restricted stock grants lacking the positive incentive effects of stock options and being viewed as a liability or expense to the firm. |
Author | Lindsey, Bradley P. Landsman, Wayne R. Irving, James H. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: James H. surname: Irving fullname: Irving, James H. organization: The first and third authors are from the College of William and Mary. The second author is from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The authors thank participants at the 2010 JBFA Conference for valuable comments and suggestions. Special thanks to the editors - Peter Pope, Andy Stark and Martin Walker - for detailed comments that helped to improve the paper. The authors are grateful to Jack Ciesielski of R.G. Associates, Inc., for providing the stock option and restricted stock grant data used in this study. Professor Landsman acknowledges funding from the Center for Finance and Accounting Research at UNC-Chapel Hill and Professors Irving and Lindsey acknowledge funding provided by the Mason School of Business at the College of William and Mary. (Paper received March 2010, revised version accepted December 2010) – sequence: 2 givenname: Wayne R. surname: Landsman fullname: Landsman, Wayne R. organization: The first and third authors are from the College of William and Mary. The second author is from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The authors thank participants at the 2010 JBFA Conference for valuable comments and suggestions. Special thanks to the editors - Peter Pope, Andy Stark and Martin Walker - for detailed comments that helped to improve the paper. The authors are grateful to Jack Ciesielski of R.G. Associates, Inc., for providing the stock option and restricted stock grant data used in this study. Professor Landsman acknowledges funding from the Center for Finance and Accounting Research at UNC-Chapel Hill and Professors Irving and Lindsey acknowledge funding provided by the Mason School of Business at the College of William and Mary. (Paper received March 2010, revised version accepted December 2010) – sequence: 3 givenname: Bradley P. surname: Lindsey fullname: Lindsey, Bradley P. email: bradley.lindsey@mason.wm.edu organization: The first and third authors are from the College of William and Mary. The second author is from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The authors thank participants at the 2010 JBFA Conference for valuable comments and suggestions. Special thanks to the editors - Peter Pope, Andy Stark and Martin Walker - for detailed comments that helped to improve the paper. The authors are grateful to Jack Ciesielski of R.G. Associates, Inc., for providing the stock option and restricted stock grant data used in this study. Professor Landsman acknowledges funding from the Center for Finance and Accounting Research at UNC-Chapel Hill and Professors Irving and Lindsey acknowledge funding provided by the Mason School of Business at the College of William and Mary. (Paper received March 2010, revised version accepted December 2010) |
BackLink | http://econpapers.repec.org/article/blajbfnac/v_3a38_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a3-4_3ap_3a395-412.htm$$DView record in RePEc |
BookMark | eNqNUE1v1DAQjVCR2Bb-Q8SFU4I_Yse5IHVLN3ysqERbFnEZOc5ETZpNgp2lu_8eZ1PtgROWPDPyvPf0_M6Ds67vMAhCSmLqz_smpolUkchEGjNCaUwY4yLevwgWp8VZsCCcyEgq-fNVcO5cQwhhVKaLYHP3gOEP3e70WPdd-LGuKrTYGXThEscnxC68HXvzGN4MR4DuyvA7utHWZsTyeZdb3Y0urHob3t-Gq9pu3evgZaVbh2-e-0Vwv7q-u_oUrW_yz1eX68iIhIuISZGoklaZQlMoLlJUlU5TZEnKtM4Uw5SUQhgkBTWm5CpJJPqemVKwBAt-EbybdQfb_955Y7CtncG21R32OweZ5JInLOMe-fYfZNPvbOfNgZIZTYWSqQepGWRs75zFCgZbb7U9ACUw5Q0NTLHCFCtMecMxb9h76nqmWhzQnHhFq5ui6rSBP8A1V74c_D1Sua6nN0h8HaYpE5BQBg_j1st9mOWe6hYP_20DvixXl9PoBaJZoHYj7k8C2j6C_2gqYPMth1xu8l_y6xJW_C9MZ7B5 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_intaccaudtax_2017_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1111_jbfa_12023 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03372885 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmrv_2017_03_002 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2395859 crossref_primary_10_2308_iace_10016 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijfe_2117 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pacfin_2022_101842 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajfs_12486 crossref_primary_10_1111_jbfa_12404 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0281244 crossref_primary_10_2308_jfir_52351 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1786332 crossref_primary_10_5465_amj_2017_0455 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_finmar_2016_09_003 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4150861 crossref_primary_10_1002_smj_2252 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcorpfin_2020_101788 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1468_5957_2011_02247_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_irfa_2024_103417 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1468_5957_2011_02262_x crossref_primary_10_1177_0148558X14537824 crossref_primary_10_1111_abac_12057 crossref_primary_10_1111_abac_12199 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1537682 crossref_primary_10_1177_1476127018804159 crossref_primary_10_2308_atax_51791 crossref_primary_10_1108_JAAR_01_2020_0013 crossref_primary_10_1111_1911_3838_12287 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4107250 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lrp_2021_102165 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_irfa_2019_101403 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2515304 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acclit_2017_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jeconbus_2016_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1468_5957_2012_02304_x crossref_primary_10_2308_JFAR_2020_017 |
Cites_doi | 10.2139/ssrn.527822 10.1177/0148558X0502000401 10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.008 10.1177/0148558X0702200203 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01208.x 10.1093/rfs/hhm077 10.2308/accr.2007.82.2.327 10.1016/S0165-4101(96)00439-9 10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.971 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.01357.x 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00062-9 10.1023/A:1009630100586 10.1162/00335530360535162 10.1086/209658 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00514.x 10.2308/accr.2010.85.2.483 10.1023/A:1011377902967 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00258-1 10.2307/3666404 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02133.x 10.2139/ssrn.1561923 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00049-4 10.1016/0165-4101(96)00421-1 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00050-7 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00017-2 10.1007/s11142-006-9008-x 10.1007/s11142-008-9068-1 10.2139/ssrn.1012306 10.1111/1468-5957.00459 10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00019-1 10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.251 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Apr/May 2011 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd – notice: Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Apr/May 2011 |
DBID | BSCLL DKI X2L AAYXX CITATION 8BJ FQK JBE |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2011.02235.x |
DatabaseName | Istex RePEc IDEAS RePEc CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) |
DatabaseTitleList | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DKI name: RePEc IDEAS url: http://ideas.repec.org/ sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Business |
EISSN | 1468-5957 |
EndPage | 412 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2362005281 10_1111_j_1468_5957_2011_02235_x blajbfnac_v_3a38_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a3_4_3ap_3a395_412_htm JBFA2235 ark_67375_WNG_G6WGZ6KB_F |
Genre | article Feature |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 1XV 29K 31~ 33P 3EH 4.4 41~ 50Y 50Z 51W 51Y 52M 52O 52Q 52S 52T 52U 52W 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 8VB 930 A04 AABCJ AABNI AAESR AAHHS AAONW AAOUF AASGY AAXRX AAYOK AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPPZ ABPVW ABSOO ABTAH ACAHQ ACBKW ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACNCT ACPOU ACSCC ACXQS ADBBV ADEMA ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADMHG ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AEMOZ AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFKFF AFPWT AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AIAGR AIFKG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AKVCP ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ASTYK AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BKOMP BMXJE BNVMJ BQESF BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 CAG COF CS3 D-C D-D D-I DC6 DCZOG DJZPD DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSSH EBA EBE EBO EBR EBS EBU EJD EMK F00 F01 FEDTE FZ0 G-S G.N G50 GODZA HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K1G K48 LATKE LC2 LC4 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSSH MSFUL MSSSH MXFUL MXSSH N04 N06 N9A NEJ NF~ O66 O9- OIG P2P P2W P2Y P4C PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QWB R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 RXW SAMSI SUPJJ TAE TH9 TN5 U5U UB1 UPT V8K W8V W99 WBKPD WEBCB WH7 WIH WII WOHZO WQZ WRC WSUWO WXSBR XG1 XSW ZL0 ZY4 ZZTAW ~IA ~WP 08R AAJUZ ABCVL ABFLS ABWRO ACXME ADDAD AFVGU AGJLS AJYWA DKI IPNFZ PQEST UMP X2L XFK AAYXX CITATION 8BJ FQK JBE |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5435-26548d1f98ecb8357e8fa77e2472aa982e70d55ce0b1ccd38446ecd39cd524eb3 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0306-686X |
IngestDate | Thu Oct 24 23:14:57 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 16:23:13 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 00:28:32 EDT 2024 Tue Nov 15 02:04:52 EST 2022 Sat Aug 24 00:41:15 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 30 10:05:18 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3-4 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5435-26548d1f98ecb8357e8fa77e2472aa982e70d55ce0b1ccd38446ecd39cd524eb3 |
Notes | ark:/67375/WNG-G6WGZ6KB-F ArticleID:JBFA2235 istex:038F7F8034D4E0760AE733DE8001976E9A7AEC99 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
PQID | 869175867 |
PQPubID | 38035 |
PageCount | 18 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_963634293 proquest_journals_869175867 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1468_5957_2011_02235_x repec_primary_blajbfnac_v_3a38_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a3_4_3ap_3a395_412_htm wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1468_5957_2011_02235_x_JBFA2235 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_G6WGZ6KB_F |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | April/May 2011 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2011 text: April/May 2011 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: Oxford |
PublicationSeriesTitle | Journal of Business Finance & Accounting |
PublicationTitle | Journal of business finance & accounting |
PublicationYear | 2011 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Blackwell |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Blackwell |
References | Carter, M., L. Lynch and I. Tuna (2007), 'The Role of Accounting in the Design of CEO Equity Compensation', The Accounting Review, Vol. 82, No. 2 (March), pp. 327-57. Kahl, M., J. Liu and F. Longstaff (2003), 'Paper Millionaires: How Valuable is Stock to a Stockholder Who is Restricted from Selling It?', Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 67, No. 3 (March), pp. 385-410. Gow, I., G. Ormazabal and D. Taylor (2010), 'Correcting for Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Dependence in Accounting Research', The Accounting Review, Vol. 85, No. 2 (March), pp. 483-512. Ohlson, J. (1995), 'Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation', Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No. 2 (Spring), pp. 661-87. Barth, M. and G. Clinch (2009), 'Scale Effects in Capital Markets-Based Accounting Research', Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 36, Nos. 3-4 (April/May), pp. 253-88. Core, J. and W. Guay (2001), 'Stock Option Plans for Non-Executive Employees', Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 61, No. 2 (August), pp. 253-87. Harter, C. and T. Harikumar (2002), 'Accounting for Option-Based Compensation: The Economic Cost Approach', Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 29, Nos. 7-8 (September/October), pp. 1007-22. Barth, M., W. Beaver, J. Hand and W. Landsman (1999), 'Accruals, Cash Flows, and Equity Values', Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 4, Nos. 3-4 (December), pp. 205-29. Barth, M., W. Beaver, J. Hand and W. Landsman (2005), 'Accruals, Accounting-Based Valuation Models, and the Prediction of Equity Values', Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Fall), pp. 311-45. Aboody, D. (1996), 'Market Valuation of Employee Stock Options', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 22, Nos. 1-3 (August/December), pp. 357-91. Hall, B. and K. Murphy (2002), 'Stock Options for Undiversified Executives', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 33, No. 1 (February), pp. 3-42. Aboody, D. M. Barth and R. Kasznik (2004), 'SFAS No. 123 Stock-Based Compensation Expense and Equity Market Values', The Accounting Review, Vol. 79, No. 2 (April), pp. 251-75. Core, J. and W. Guay (1999), 'The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 28, No. 2 (December), pp. 151-84. Meulbroek, L. (2001), 'The Efficiency of Equity-Linked Compensation: Understanding the Full Cost of Awarding Executive Stock Options', Financial Management, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Summer), pp. 5-44. Gompers, P., J. Ishii and A. Metrick (2003), 'Corporate Governance and Equity Prices', Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118, No. 1 (February), pp. 107-55. Hanlon, M., S. Rajgopal and T. Shevlin (2003), 'Are Executive Stock Options Associated with Future Earnings?', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 36, Nos. 1-3 (December), pp. 3-43. Kadan, O. and J. Swinkels (2008), 'Stock or Options? Moral Hazard, Firm Viability, and the Design of Compensation Contracts', Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 21, No. 1 (January), pp. 451-82. Barth, M. and S. Kallapur (1996), 'The Effects of Cross-Sectional Scale Differences on Regression Results in Empirical Accounting Research', Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Fall), pp. 527-67. Baber, W., S. Janakiraman and S. Kang (1996), 'Investment Opportunities and the Structure of Executive Compensation', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 21, No. 3 (June), pp. 297-318. Bryan, S., L. Hwang and S. Lilien (2000), 'CEO Stock-Based Compensation: An Empirical Analysis of Incentive-Intensity, Relative Mix, and Economic Determinants', Journal of Business, Vol. 73, No. 4 (October), pp. 661-93. Bell, T., W. Landsman, B. Miller and S. Yeh (2002), 'The Valuation Implications of Employee Stock Option Accounting for Profitable Computer Software Firms', The Accounting Review, Vol. 77, No. 4 (October), pp. 971-96. Landsman, W., M. Lang and S. Yeh (2007), 'Governance and the Split of Options between Executive and Nonexecutive Employees', Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, Vol. 22, No. 2 (Spring), pp. 109-38. Barth, M., W. Beaver and W. Landsman (1998), 'Relative Valuation Roles of Equity Book Values and Net Income as a Function of Financial Health', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 25, No. 1 (February), pp. 1-34. Landsman, W., K. Peasnell, P. Pope and S. Yeh (2006), 'Which Approach to Accounting for Employee Stock Options Best Reflects Market Pricing?', Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 11, Nos. 2-3 (September), pp. 203-45. Dechow, P., A. Hutton and R. Sloan (1999), 'An Empirical Assessment of the Residual Income Valuation Model', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 26, Nos. 1-3 (January), pp. 1-34. Dittmann, I. and E. Maug (2007), 'Lower Salaries and No Options? On the Optimal Structure of Executive Pay', Journal of Finance, Vol. 62, No. 1 (February), pp. 303-43. Williams, M. and R. Rao (2006), 'CEO Stock Options and Equity Risk Incentives', Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 33, Nos. 1-2 (January/March), pp. 26-44. Aboody, D. and R. Kasznik (2008), 'Executive Stock-Based Compensation and Firms' Cash Payout: The Role of Shareholders' Tax-Related Payout Preferences', Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 13, Nos. 2-3 (September), pp. 216-51. Feltham, G. and M. Wu (2001), 'Incentive Efficiency of Stock versus Options', Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1 (March), pp. 7-28. 2003; 118 2010 2006; 11 2006; 33 1999; 28 1999; 26 1995; 11 2002; 77 2002; 33 2000; 73 2003; 36 2005; 20 2007 2008; 13 1999; 4 2004 1996; 13 2010; 85 1998; 25 2009; 36 2001; 61 2002; 29 2001; 6 2004; 79 2007; 82 2008; 21 2007; 62 2007; 1 2007; 22 1996; 21 2001; 30 1996; 22 2003; 67 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_27_1 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_31_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_34_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 e_1_2_8_33_1 Lambert R. (e_1_2_8_29_1) 2007 e_1_2_8_30_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 4 start-page: 205 issue: 3‐4 year: 1999 end-page: 29 article-title: ‘Accruals, Cash Flows, and Equity Values’ publication-title: Review of Accounting Studies – volume: 82 start-page: 327 issue: 2 year: 2007 end-page: 57 article-title: ‘The Role of Accounting in the Design of CEO Equity Compensation’ publication-title: The Accounting Review – volume: 25 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 1998 end-page: 34 article-title: ‘Relative Valuation Roles of Equity Book Values and Net Income as a Function of Financial Health’ publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics – volume: 77 start-page: 971 issue: 4 year: 2002 end-page: 96 article-title: ‘The Valuation Implications of Employee Stock Option Accounting for Profitable Computer Software Firms’ publication-title: The Accounting Review – volume: 29 start-page: 1007 issue: 7‐8 year: 2002 end-page: 22 article-title: ‘Accounting for Option‐Based Compensation: The Economic Cost Approach’ publication-title: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting – volume: 11 start-page: 661 issue: 2 year: 1995 end-page: 87 article-title: ‘Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation’ publication-title: Contemporary Accounting Research – volume: 22 start-page: 357 issue: 1‐3 year: 1996 end-page: 91 article-title: ‘Market Valuation of Employee Stock Options’ publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics – year: 2007 – volume: 13 start-page: 216 issue: 2‐3 year: 2008 end-page: 51 article-title: ‘Executive Stock‐Based Compensation and Firms’ Cash Payout: The Role of Shareholders’ Tax‐Related Payout Preferences’ publication-title: Review of Accounting Studies – volume: 20 start-page: 311 issue: 4 year: 2005 end-page: 45 article-title: ‘Accruals, Accounting‐Based Valuation Models, and the Prediction of Equity Values’ publication-title: Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance – volume: 61 start-page: 253 issue: 2 year: 2001 end-page: 87 article-title: ‘Stock Option Plans for Non‐Executive Employees’ publication-title: Journal of Financial Economics – volume: 33 start-page: 26 issue: 1‐2 year: 2006 end-page: 44 article-title: ‘CEO Stock Options and Equity Risk Incentives’ publication-title: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting – volume: 85 start-page: 483 issue: 2 year: 2010 end-page: 512 article-title: ‘Correcting for Cross‐Sectional and Time‐Series Dependence in Accounting Research’ publication-title: The Accounting Review – volume: 21 start-page: 451 issue: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 82 article-title: ‘Stock or Options? Moral Hazard, Firm Viability, and the Design of Compensation Contracts’ publication-title: Review of Financial Studies – year: 2010 – volume: 6 start-page: 7 issue: 1 year: 2001 end-page: 28 article-title: ‘Incentive Efficiency of Stock versus Options’ publication-title: Review of Accounting Studies – volume: 28 start-page: 151 issue: 2 year: 1999 end-page: 84 article-title: ‘The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels’ publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics – volume: 62 start-page: 303 issue: 1 year: 2007 end-page: 43 article-title: ‘Lower Salaries and No Options? On the Optimal Structure of Executive Pay’ publication-title: Journal of Finance – volume: 36 start-page: 3 issue: 1‐3 year: 2003 end-page: 43 article-title: ‘Are Executive Stock Options Associated with Future Earnings?’ publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics – volume: 1 start-page: 247 year: 2007 end-page: 68 – volume: 26 start-page: 1 issue: 1‐3 year: 1999 end-page: 34 article-title: ‘An Empirical Assessment of the Residual Income Valuation Model’ publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics – year: 2004 – volume: 67 start-page: 385 issue: 3 year: 2003 end-page: 410 article-title: ‘Paper Millionaires: How Valuable is Stock to a Stockholder Who is Restricted from Selling It?’ publication-title: Journal of Financial Economics – volume: 73 start-page: 661 issue: 4 year: 2000 end-page: 93 article-title: ‘CEO Stock‐Based Compensation: An Empirical Analysis of Incentive‐Intensity, Relative Mix, and Economic Determinants’ publication-title: Journal of Business – volume: 79 start-page: 251 issue: 2 year: 2004 end-page: 75 article-title: ‘SFAS No. 123 Stock‐Based Compensation Expense and Equity Market Values’ publication-title: The Accounting Review – volume: 21 start-page: 297 issue: 3 year: 1996 end-page: 318 article-title: ‘Investment Opportunities and the Structure of Executive Compensation’ publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics – volume: 11 start-page: 203 issue: 2‐3 year: 2006 end-page: 45 article-title: ‘Which Approach to Accounting for Employee Stock Options Best Reflects Market Pricing?’ publication-title: Review of Accounting Studies – volume: 36 start-page: 253 issue: 3‐4 year: 2009 end-page: 88 article-title: ‘Scale Effects in Capital Markets‐Based Accounting Research’ publication-title: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting – volume: 118 start-page: 107 issue: 1 year: 2003 end-page: 55 article-title: ‘Corporate Governance and Equity Prices’ publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Economics – volume: 22 start-page: 109 issue: 2 year: 2007 end-page: 38 article-title: ‘Governance and the Split of Options between Executive and Nonexecutive Employees’ publication-title: Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance – volume: 30 start-page: 5 issue: 2 year: 2001 end-page: 44 article-title: ‘The Efficiency of Equity‐Linked Compensation: Understanding the Full Cost of Awarding Executive Stock Options’ publication-title: Financial Management – volume: 13 start-page: 527 issue: 2 year: 1996 end-page: 67 article-title: ‘The Effects of Cross‐Sectional Scale Differences on Regression Results in Empirical Accounting Research’ publication-title: Contemporary Accounting Research – volume: 33 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2002 end-page: 42 article-title: ‘Stock Options for Undiversified Executives’ publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics – ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.527822 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1177/0148558X0502000401 – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.008 – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 doi: 10.1177/0148558X0702200203 – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01208.x – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhm077 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.2.327 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(96)00439-9 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.971 – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.01357.x – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00062-9 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1009630100586 – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1162/00335530360535162 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1086/209658 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00514.x – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.2.483 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1011377902967 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00258-1 – ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 doi: 10.2307/3666404 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02133.x – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1561923 – ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00049-4 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(96)00421-1 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00050-7 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00017-2 – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.1007/s11142-006-9008-x – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1007/s11142-008-9068-1 – start-page: 247 volume-title: Handbook of Management Accounting Research year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 contributor: fullname: Lambert R. – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1012306 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1111/1468-5957.00459 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00019-1 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.251 |
SSID | ssj0002167 |
Score | 2.1117034 |
Snippet | : In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option‐based compensation to restricted stock‐based compensation.... In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option‐based compensation to restricted stock‐based compensation.... In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option-based compensation to restricted stock-based compensation.... |
SourceID | proquest crossref repec wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 395 |
SubjectTerms | Book value Compensation Endogeneity Enterprises Financial research Firm value Options on stocks Restricted stock Securities markets stock compensation Stock options Stocks Studies U.S.A Valuation Valuation methods |
Title | The Valuation Differences Between Stock Option and Restricted Stock Grants for US Firms |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-G6WGZ6KB-F/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1468-5957.2011.02235.x http://econpapers.repec.org/article/blajbfnac/v_3a38_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a3-4_3ap_3a395-412.htm https://www.proquest.com/docview/869175867 https://search.proquest.com/docview/963634293 |
Volume | 38 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQKyEuUF4iFCofELeskjh-5NilzZZWFKll2RUXy7EdUZamq2wWtf31HTvJolQcEOIQx4oVJ37M-BvnywxC7wpTMmJ0BmaJsWFKVRQqakhIdVYaGilNfEiWT6fsaJoez-m84z-5f2Fa_xCbDTcnGV5fOwFXxeq-kIuQZpR3njhhpaMjhydjwh276-DstyepJPbBZB1CDplg8yGp548VDVaqbdfp1wMYul3bpdVDUOtXpfwJWvTtackoi9G6KUb69p6rx__T4B30uAOveL-dbU_RA1s9Qw977vxzNINJh7_27sPxQRd8BVQRHrd8MHzegALGn72iwqoy-My6yCEagG9XNqkdNQcDmMbTc5xf1JerF2iaH375cBR2kRtCTQF_hYmLRm_iMhNWF4DxuBWl4twmKU-UykRieWQo1TYqYq0NEWCUWjhn2tAkBfv-Jdqqrir7CmEGFpwCVKHAFE1jGwlFANMIBfUTankZoLgfJblsHXTIgWEjpOsx6XpM-h6T1wF674dzc4OqF47gxqmcnU7khM0m39jJWOYB2u3HW3ayvZKCgYlLBeMBwptSEEr3pUVV9mq9kqDVGIGVngTo0M-SzZOKn-pHUVZKy1-SQFMguYHDvx1RF-6aTCFdulxGZRon8ntzGSDup8ZfN1Eej_N9l339z3fuokftBrqjKb1BW029tm8BgTXFHsjWycc9L2F3EuYgtg |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,1378,4018,27938,27939,46308,46732 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwELfQKgEvjE-RjQ8_IN5SJXHsOI8rW1r2UaRtpRUvlmM7YmzLqjRFg7-es5MUZeIBIR7iWLHi5Gzf3e-cyx1C73JdMKJVCmaJNn5MZeBLqolPVVpoGkhFXEqWkymbzOLDBV206YDsvzBNfIjNhpvlDCevLYPbDem7XM59mtKkDcUJqo4OAVAOgPuJTWewf_o7llQUunSyFiP7jLNF363njz31dNXADvttD4gOKrM0qg9rnV7KttFVR1HjjnI5XNf5UP28E-zxP5H8GD1q8SveaxbcE3TPlE_R_c59_hmaw7rDn7sI4ni_zb8C0giPGpcwfFaDDMafnKzCstT41NjkIQqwb9s2rqx3DgY8jWdnOLuorlfP0Sw7OP8w8dvkDb6iAMH8yCak12GRcqNygHmJ4YVMEhPFSSRlyiOTBJpSZYI8VEoTDnapgXOqNI1iMPFfoK3ypjQvEWZgxEkAFhKs0Tg0AZcEYA2X0D-hJik8FHbTJJZNjA7Rs224sCMm7IgJN2Li1kPv3XxubpDVpfVxS6iYT8dizObjL-xoJDIP7XYTLlr2XgnOwMqlnCUewptW4Ev7sUWW5ma9EiDYGAFlTzx04JbJ5kn5lfyWF6VU4rsgQAoUP-Bwb0fkhb0mYiiXtpZSEYeR-Fpfeyhxa-OvSRSHo2zPVnf--c636MHk_ORYHH-cHu2ih81-uvVaeoW26mptXgMgq_M3jtF-AVTaI9c |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Nb9MwFLfQKk1cYHyJsAE-IG6pkjh2nONKl44NCtoorbhYju1ooyyr0hQN_nqenaQoEweEOMSxYsWJP97z7zm_vIfQq1wXjGiVglmijR9TGfiSauJTlRaaBlIRF5Ll_ZQdz-KTBV20_Cf7L0zjH2K74WYlw-lrK-ArXdwWcu7TlCatJ05Y6egQ8OQgZiSw9K7x2W9XUlHooslaiOwzzhZ9Vs8fa-otVQPb6zc9HDqozMqoPqp1y1J2Hy27BjVslOVwU-dD9fOWr8f_0-I9dK9Fr_iwmW4P0B1TPkS7HXn-EZrDrMOfO__heNxGXwFdhEcNIQyf16CB8QenqbAsNT4zNnSIAuTblk0qy83BgKbx7Bxnl9XV-jGaZUef3hz7begGX1EAYH5kw9HrsEi5UTmAvMTwQiaJieIkkjLlkUkCTakyQR4qpQkHq9TAOVWaRjEY-E_QTnldmqcIMzDhJMAKCbZoHJqASwKghkuon1CTFB4Ku1ESq8ZDh-hZNlzYHhO2x4TrMXHjodduOLc3yGppGW4JFfPpREzYfPKFnY5E5qH9brxFK9xrwRnYuJSzxEN4WwpSaT-1yNJcb9YC1BojsNQTDx25WbJ9Uv5Nfs2LUirxXRBoCiQ_4HBvR-SlvSZiSFc2l1IRh5G4qK88lLip8ddNFCej7NBmn_3znS_R7sdxJt69nZ7uo7vNZrqlLB2gnbramOeAxur8hROzX7T8IoY |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Valuation+Differences+Between+Stock+Option+and+Restricted+Stock+Grants+for+US+Firms&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+business+finance+%26+accounting&rft.au=Irving%2C+James+H.&rft.au=Landsman%2C+Wayne+R.&rft.au=Lindsey%2C+Bradley+P.&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0306-686X&rft.eissn=1468-5957&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3%E2%80%904&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1468-5957.2011.02235.x&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fj.1468-5957.2011.02235.x&rft.externalDocID=JBFA2235 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0306-686X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0306-686X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0306-686X&client=summon |