The Valuation Differences Between Stock Option and Restricted Stock Grants for US Firms

:  In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option‐based compensation to restricted stock‐based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of business finance & accounting Vol. 38; no. 3-4; pp. 395 - 412
Main Authors Irving, James H., Landsman, Wayne R., Lindsey, Bradley P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2011
Wiley Blackwell
SeriesJournal of Business Finance & Accounting
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract :  In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option‐based compensation to restricted stock‐based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate cross‐sectional valuation equations that include the value of stock option and restricted stock grants summed over the current and past two years, residual income, and book value of equity, after controlling for endogeneity. Consistent with prior research, our findings indicate that the market on average values stock option grants positively. However, in contrast to stock option grants, restricted stock grants are valued negatively. This result is consistent with restricted stock grants lacking the positive incentive effects of stock options and being viewed as a liability or expense to the firm.
AbstractList In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option-based compensation to restricted stock-based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate cross-sectional valuation equations that include the value of stock option and restricted stock grants summed over the current and past two years, residual income, and book value of equity, after controlling for endogeneity. Consistent with prior research, our findings indicate that the market on average values stock option grants positively. However, in contrast to stock option grants, restricted stock grants are valued negatively. This result is consistent with restricted stock grants lacking the positive incentive effects of stock options and being viewed as a liability or expense to the firm. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers
In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option‐based compensation to restricted stock‐based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate cross‐sectional valuation equations that include the value of stock option and restricted stock grants summed over the current and past two years, residual income, and book value of equity, after controlling for endogeneity. Consistent with prior research, our findings indicate that the market on average values stock option grants positively. However, in contrast to stock option grants, restricted stock grants are valued negatively. This result is consistent with restricted stock grants lacking the positive incentive effects of stock options and being viewed as a liability or expense to the firm.
In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option-based compensation to restricted stock-based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate cross-sectional valuation equations that include the value of stock option and restricted stock grants summed over the current and past two years, residual income, and book value of equity, after controlling for endogeneity. Consistent with prior research, our findings indicate that the market on average values stock option grants positively. However, in contrast to stock option grants, restricted stock grants are valued negatively. This result is consistent with restricted stock grants lacking the positive incentive effects of stock options and being viewed as a liability or expense to the firm. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
:  In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option‐based compensation to restricted stock‐based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate cross‐sectional valuation equations that include the value of stock option and restricted stock grants summed over the current and past two years, residual income, and book value of equity, after controlling for endogeneity. Consistent with prior research, our findings indicate that the market on average values stock option grants positively. However, in contrast to stock option grants, restricted stock grants are valued negatively. This result is consistent with restricted stock grants lacking the positive incentive effects of stock options and being viewed as a liability or expense to the firm.
Author Lindsey, Bradley P.
Landsman, Wayne R.
Irving, James H.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: James H.
  surname: Irving
  fullname: Irving, James H.
  organization: The first and third authors are from the College of William and Mary. The second author is from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The authors thank participants at the 2010 JBFA Conference for valuable comments and suggestions. Special thanks to the editors - Peter Pope, Andy Stark and Martin Walker - for detailed comments that helped to improve the paper. The authors are grateful to Jack Ciesielski of R.G. Associates, Inc., for providing the stock option and restricted stock grant data used in this study. Professor Landsman acknowledges funding from the Center for Finance and Accounting Research at UNC-Chapel Hill and Professors Irving and Lindsey acknowledge funding provided by the Mason School of Business at the College of William and Mary. (Paper received March 2010, revised version accepted December 2010)
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Wayne R.
  surname: Landsman
  fullname: Landsman, Wayne R.
  organization: The first and third authors are from the College of William and Mary. The second author is from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The authors thank participants at the 2010 JBFA Conference for valuable comments and suggestions. Special thanks to the editors - Peter Pope, Andy Stark and Martin Walker - for detailed comments that helped to improve the paper. The authors are grateful to Jack Ciesielski of R.G. Associates, Inc., for providing the stock option and restricted stock grant data used in this study. Professor Landsman acknowledges funding from the Center for Finance and Accounting Research at UNC-Chapel Hill and Professors Irving and Lindsey acknowledge funding provided by the Mason School of Business at the College of William and Mary. (Paper received March 2010, revised version accepted December 2010)
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Bradley P.
  surname: Lindsey
  fullname: Lindsey, Bradley P.
  email: bradley.lindsey@mason.wm.edu
  organization: The first and third authors are from the College of William and Mary. The second author is from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The authors thank participants at the 2010 JBFA Conference for valuable comments and suggestions. Special thanks to the editors - Peter Pope, Andy Stark and Martin Walker - for detailed comments that helped to improve the paper. The authors are grateful to Jack Ciesielski of R.G. Associates, Inc., for providing the stock option and restricted stock grant data used in this study. Professor Landsman acknowledges funding from the Center for Finance and Accounting Research at UNC-Chapel Hill and Professors Irving and Lindsey acknowledge funding provided by the Mason School of Business at the College of William and Mary. (Paper received March 2010, revised version accepted December 2010)
BackLink http://econpapers.repec.org/article/blajbfnac/v_3a38_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a3-4_3ap_3a395-412.htm$$DView record in RePEc
BookMark eNqNUE1v1DAQjVCR2Bb-Q8SFU4I_Yse5IHVLN3ysqERbFnEZOc5ETZpNgp2lu_8eZ1PtgROWPDPyvPf0_M6Ds67vMAhCSmLqz_smpolUkchEGjNCaUwY4yLevwgWp8VZsCCcyEgq-fNVcO5cQwhhVKaLYHP3gOEP3e70WPdd-LGuKrTYGXThEscnxC68HXvzGN4MR4DuyvA7utHWZsTyeZdb3Y0urHob3t-Gq9pu3evgZaVbh2-e-0Vwv7q-u_oUrW_yz1eX68iIhIuISZGoklaZQlMoLlJUlU5TZEnKtM4Uw5SUQhgkBTWm5CpJJPqemVKwBAt-EbybdQfb_955Y7CtncG21R32OweZ5JInLOMe-fYfZNPvbOfNgZIZTYWSqQepGWRs75zFCgZbb7U9ACUw5Q0NTLHCFCtMecMxb9h76nqmWhzQnHhFq5ui6rSBP8A1V74c_D1Sua6nN0h8HaYpE5BQBg_j1st9mOWe6hYP_20DvixXl9PoBaJZoHYj7k8C2j6C_2gqYPMth1xu8l_y6xJW_C9MZ7B5
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_intaccaudtax_2017_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1111_jbfa_12023
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03372885
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmrv_2017_03_002
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2395859
crossref_primary_10_2308_iace_10016
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijfe_2117
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pacfin_2022_101842
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajfs_12486
crossref_primary_10_1111_jbfa_12404
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0281244
crossref_primary_10_2308_jfir_52351
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1786332
crossref_primary_10_5465_amj_2017_0455
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_finmar_2016_09_003
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4150861
crossref_primary_10_1002_smj_2252
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcorpfin_2020_101788
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1468_5957_2011_02247_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_irfa_2024_103417
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1468_5957_2011_02262_x
crossref_primary_10_1177_0148558X14537824
crossref_primary_10_1111_abac_12057
crossref_primary_10_1111_abac_12199
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1537682
crossref_primary_10_1177_1476127018804159
crossref_primary_10_2308_atax_51791
crossref_primary_10_1108_JAAR_01_2020_0013
crossref_primary_10_1111_1911_3838_12287
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4107250
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lrp_2021_102165
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_irfa_2019_101403
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2515304
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acclit_2017_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jeconbus_2016_04_002
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1468_5957_2012_02304_x
crossref_primary_10_2308_JFAR_2020_017
Cites_doi 10.2139/ssrn.527822
10.1177/0148558X0502000401
10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.008
10.1177/0148558X0702200203
10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01208.x
10.1093/rfs/hhm077
10.2308/accr.2007.82.2.327
10.1016/S0165-4101(96)00439-9
10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.971
10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.01357.x
10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00062-9
10.1023/A:1009630100586
10.1162/00335530360535162
10.1086/209658
10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00514.x
10.2308/accr.2010.85.2.483
10.1023/A:1011377902967
10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00258-1
10.2307/3666404
10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02133.x
10.2139/ssrn.1561923
10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x
10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00049-4
10.1016/0165-4101(96)00421-1
10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00050-7
10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00017-2
10.1007/s11142-006-9008-x
10.1007/s11142-008-9068-1
10.2139/ssrn.1012306
10.1111/1468-5957.00459
10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00019-1
10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.251
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Apr/May 2011
Copyright_xml – notice: 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– notice: Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Apr/May 2011
DBID BSCLL
DKI
X2L
AAYXX
CITATION
8BJ
FQK
JBE
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2011.02235.x
DatabaseName Istex
RePEc IDEAS
RePEc
CrossRef
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
DatabaseTitleList International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
CrossRef
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DKI
  name: RePEc IDEAS
  url: http://ideas.repec.org/
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Business
EISSN 1468-5957
EndPage 412
ExternalDocumentID 2362005281
10_1111_j_1468_5957_2011_02235_x
blajbfnac_v_3a38_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a3_4_3ap_3a395_412_htm
JBFA2235
ark_67375_WNG_G6WGZ6KB_F
Genre article
Feature
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GroupedDBID -~X
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
1XV
29K
31~
33P
3EH
4.4
41~
50Y
50Z
51W
51Y
52M
52O
52Q
52S
52T
52U
52W
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
8VB
930
A04
AABCJ
AABNI
AAESR
AAHHS
AAONW
AAOUF
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYOK
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABSOO
ABTAH
ACAHQ
ACBKW
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACSCC
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADEMA
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADMHG
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AEMOZ
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFKFF
AFPWT
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIAGR
AIFKG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AKVCP
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ASTYK
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BKOMP
BMXJE
BNVMJ
BQESF
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
CAG
COF
CS3
D-C
D-D
D-I
DC6
DCZOG
DJZPD
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSSH
EBA
EBE
EBO
EBR
EBS
EBU
EJD
EMK
F00
F01
FEDTE
FZ0
G-S
G.N
G50
GODZA
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K1G
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC4
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSSH
MSFUL
MSSSH
MXFUL
MXSSH
N04
N06
N9A
NEJ
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
P2P
P2W
P2Y
P4C
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QWB
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
RXW
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TAE
TH9
TN5
U5U
UB1
UPT
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WEBCB
WH7
WIH
WII
WOHZO
WQZ
WRC
WSUWO
WXSBR
XG1
XSW
ZL0
ZY4
ZZTAW
~IA
~WP
08R
AAJUZ
ABCVL
ABFLS
ABWRO
ACXME
ADDAD
AFVGU
AGJLS
AJYWA
DKI
IPNFZ
PQEST
UMP
X2L
XFK
AAYXX
CITATION
8BJ
FQK
JBE
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5435-26548d1f98ecb8357e8fa77e2472aa982e70d55ce0b1ccd38446ecd39cd524eb3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0306-686X
IngestDate Thu Oct 24 23:14:57 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 16:23:13 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 00:28:32 EDT 2024
Tue Nov 15 02:04:52 EST 2022
Sat Aug 24 00:41:15 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 30 10:05:18 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3-4
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5435-26548d1f98ecb8357e8fa77e2472aa982e70d55ce0b1ccd38446ecd39cd524eb3
Notes ark:/67375/WNG-G6WGZ6KB-F
ArticleID:JBFA2235
istex:038F7F8034D4E0760AE733DE8001976E9A7AEC99
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PQID 869175867
PQPubID 38035
PageCount 18
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_963634293
proquest_journals_869175867
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1468_5957_2011_02235_x
repec_primary_blajbfnac_v_3a38_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a3_4_3ap_3a395_412_htm
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1468_5957_2011_02235_x_JBFA2235
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_G6WGZ6KB_F
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate April/May 2011
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2011
  text: April/May 2011
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Oxford, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford, UK
– name: Oxford
PublicationSeriesTitle Journal of Business Finance & Accounting
PublicationTitle Journal of business finance & accounting
PublicationYear 2011
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Blackwell
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Blackwell
References Carter, M., L. Lynch and I. Tuna (2007), 'The Role of Accounting in the Design of CEO Equity Compensation', The Accounting Review, Vol. 82, No. 2 (March), pp. 327-57.
Kahl, M., J. Liu and F. Longstaff (2003), 'Paper Millionaires: How Valuable is Stock to a Stockholder Who is Restricted from Selling It?', Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 67, No. 3 (March), pp. 385-410.
Gow, I., G. Ormazabal and D. Taylor (2010), 'Correcting for Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Dependence in Accounting Research', The Accounting Review, Vol. 85, No. 2 (March), pp. 483-512.
Ohlson, J. (1995), 'Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation', Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No. 2 (Spring), pp. 661-87.
Barth, M. and G. Clinch (2009), 'Scale Effects in Capital Markets-Based Accounting Research', Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 36, Nos. 3-4 (April/May), pp. 253-88.
Core, J. and W. Guay (2001), 'Stock Option Plans for Non-Executive Employees', Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 61, No. 2 (August), pp. 253-87.
Harter, C. and T. Harikumar (2002), 'Accounting for Option-Based Compensation: The Economic Cost Approach', Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 29, Nos. 7-8 (September/October), pp. 1007-22.
Barth, M., W. Beaver, J. Hand and W. Landsman (1999), 'Accruals, Cash Flows, and Equity Values', Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 4, Nos. 3-4 (December), pp. 205-29.
Barth, M., W. Beaver, J. Hand and W. Landsman (2005), 'Accruals, Accounting-Based Valuation Models, and the Prediction of Equity Values', Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Fall), pp. 311-45.
Aboody, D. (1996), 'Market Valuation of Employee Stock Options', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 22, Nos. 1-3 (August/December), pp. 357-91.
Hall, B. and K. Murphy (2002), 'Stock Options for Undiversified Executives', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 33, No. 1 (February), pp. 3-42.
Aboody, D. M. Barth and R. Kasznik (2004), 'SFAS No. 123 Stock-Based Compensation Expense and Equity Market Values', The Accounting Review, Vol. 79, No. 2 (April), pp. 251-75.
Core, J. and W. Guay (1999), 'The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 28, No. 2 (December), pp. 151-84.
Meulbroek, L. (2001), 'The Efficiency of Equity-Linked Compensation: Understanding the Full Cost of Awarding Executive Stock Options', Financial Management, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Summer), pp. 5-44.
Gompers, P., J. Ishii and A. Metrick (2003), 'Corporate Governance and Equity Prices', Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118, No. 1 (February), pp. 107-55.
Hanlon, M., S. Rajgopal and T. Shevlin (2003), 'Are Executive Stock Options Associated with Future Earnings?', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 36, Nos. 1-3 (December), pp. 3-43.
Kadan, O. and J. Swinkels (2008), 'Stock or Options? Moral Hazard, Firm Viability, and the Design of Compensation Contracts', Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 21, No. 1 (January), pp. 451-82.
Barth, M. and S. Kallapur (1996), 'The Effects of Cross-Sectional Scale Differences on Regression Results in Empirical Accounting Research', Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Fall), pp. 527-67.
Baber, W., S. Janakiraman and S. Kang (1996), 'Investment Opportunities and the Structure of Executive Compensation', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 21, No. 3 (June), pp. 297-318.
Bryan, S., L. Hwang and S. Lilien (2000), 'CEO Stock-Based Compensation: An Empirical Analysis of Incentive-Intensity, Relative Mix, and Economic Determinants', Journal of Business, Vol. 73, No. 4 (October), pp. 661-93.
Bell, T., W. Landsman, B. Miller and S. Yeh (2002), 'The Valuation Implications of Employee Stock Option Accounting for Profitable Computer Software Firms', The Accounting Review, Vol. 77, No. 4 (October), pp. 971-96.
Landsman, W., M. Lang and S. Yeh (2007), 'Governance and the Split of Options between Executive and Nonexecutive Employees', Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, Vol. 22, No. 2 (Spring), pp. 109-38.
Barth, M., W. Beaver and W. Landsman (1998), 'Relative Valuation Roles of Equity Book Values and Net Income as a Function of Financial Health', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 25, No. 1 (February), pp. 1-34.
Landsman, W., K. Peasnell, P. Pope and S. Yeh (2006), 'Which Approach to Accounting for Employee Stock Options Best Reflects Market Pricing?', Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 11, Nos. 2-3 (September), pp. 203-45.
Dechow, P., A. Hutton and R. Sloan (1999), 'An Empirical Assessment of the Residual Income Valuation Model', Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 26, Nos. 1-3 (January), pp. 1-34.
Dittmann, I. and E. Maug (2007), 'Lower Salaries and No Options? On the Optimal Structure of Executive Pay', Journal of Finance, Vol. 62, No. 1 (February), pp. 303-43.
Williams, M. and R. Rao (2006), 'CEO Stock Options and Equity Risk Incentives', Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 33, Nos. 1-2 (January/March), pp. 26-44.
Aboody, D. and R. Kasznik (2008), 'Executive Stock-Based Compensation and Firms' Cash Payout: The Role of Shareholders' Tax-Related Payout Preferences', Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 13, Nos. 2-3 (September), pp. 216-51.
Feltham, G. and M. Wu (2001), 'Incentive Efficiency of Stock versus Options', Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1 (March), pp. 7-28.
2003; 118
2010
2006; 11
2006; 33
1999; 28
1999; 26
1995; 11
2002; 77
2002; 33
2000; 73
2003; 36
2005; 20
2007
2008; 13
1999; 4
2004
1996; 13
2010; 85
1998; 25
2009; 36
2001; 61
2002; 29
2001; 6
2004; 79
2007; 82
2008; 21
2007; 62
2007; 1
2007; 22
1996; 21
2001; 30
1996; 22
2003; 67
e_1_2_8_28_1
e_1_2_8_24_1
e_1_2_8_25_1
e_1_2_8_26_1
e_1_2_8_27_1
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_20_1
e_1_2_8_21_1
e_1_2_8_22_1
e_1_2_8_23_1
e_1_2_8_17_1
e_1_2_8_18_1
e_1_2_8_19_1
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_14_1
e_1_2_8_35_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_16_1
e_1_2_8_32_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_31_1
e_1_2_8_11_1
e_1_2_8_34_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
e_1_2_8_33_1
Lambert R. (e_1_2_8_29_1) 2007
e_1_2_8_30_1
References_xml – volume: 4
  start-page: 205
  issue: 3‐4
  year: 1999
  end-page: 29
  article-title: ‘Accruals, Cash Flows, and Equity Values’
  publication-title: Review of Accounting Studies
– volume: 82
  start-page: 327
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  end-page: 57
  article-title: ‘The Role of Accounting in the Design of CEO Equity Compensation’
  publication-title: The Accounting Review
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 1998
  end-page: 34
  article-title: ‘Relative Valuation Roles of Equity Book Values and Net Income as a Function of Financial Health’
  publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics
– volume: 77
  start-page: 971
  issue: 4
  year: 2002
  end-page: 96
  article-title: ‘The Valuation Implications of Employee Stock Option Accounting for Profitable Computer Software Firms’
  publication-title: The Accounting Review
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1007
  issue: 7‐8
  year: 2002
  end-page: 22
  article-title: ‘Accounting for Option‐Based Compensation: The Economic Cost Approach’
  publication-title: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting
– volume: 11
  start-page: 661
  issue: 2
  year: 1995
  end-page: 87
  article-title: ‘Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation’
  publication-title: Contemporary Accounting Research
– volume: 22
  start-page: 357
  issue: 1‐3
  year: 1996
  end-page: 91
  article-title: ‘Market Valuation of Employee Stock Options’
  publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics
– year: 2007
– volume: 13
  start-page: 216
  issue: 2‐3
  year: 2008
  end-page: 51
  article-title: ‘Executive Stock‐Based Compensation and Firms’ Cash Payout: The Role of Shareholders’ Tax‐Related Payout Preferences’
  publication-title: Review of Accounting Studies
– volume: 20
  start-page: 311
  issue: 4
  year: 2005
  end-page: 45
  article-title: ‘Accruals, Accounting‐Based Valuation Models, and the Prediction of Equity Values’
  publication-title: Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance
– volume: 61
  start-page: 253
  issue: 2
  year: 2001
  end-page: 87
  article-title: ‘Stock Option Plans for Non‐Executive Employees’
  publication-title: Journal of Financial Economics
– volume: 33
  start-page: 26
  issue: 1‐2
  year: 2006
  end-page: 44
  article-title: ‘CEO Stock Options and Equity Risk Incentives’
  publication-title: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting
– volume: 85
  start-page: 483
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  end-page: 512
  article-title: ‘Correcting for Cross‐Sectional and Time‐Series Dependence in Accounting Research’
  publication-title: The Accounting Review
– volume: 21
  start-page: 451
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  end-page: 82
  article-title: ‘Stock or Options? Moral Hazard, Firm Viability, and the Design of Compensation Contracts’
  publication-title: Review of Financial Studies
– year: 2010
– volume: 6
  start-page: 7
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  end-page: 28
  article-title: ‘Incentive Efficiency of Stock versus Options’
  publication-title: Review of Accounting Studies
– volume: 28
  start-page: 151
  issue: 2
  year: 1999
  end-page: 84
  article-title: ‘The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels’
  publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics
– volume: 62
  start-page: 303
  issue: 1
  year: 2007
  end-page: 43
  article-title: ‘Lower Salaries and No Options? On the Optimal Structure of Executive Pay’
  publication-title: Journal of Finance
– volume: 36
  start-page: 3
  issue: 1‐3
  year: 2003
  end-page: 43
  article-title: ‘Are Executive Stock Options Associated with Future Earnings?’
  publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics
– volume: 1
  start-page: 247
  year: 2007
  end-page: 68
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1‐3
  year: 1999
  end-page: 34
  article-title: ‘An Empirical Assessment of the Residual Income Valuation Model’
  publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics
– year: 2004
– volume: 67
  start-page: 385
  issue: 3
  year: 2003
  end-page: 410
  article-title: ‘Paper Millionaires: How Valuable is Stock to a Stockholder Who is Restricted from Selling It?’
  publication-title: Journal of Financial Economics
– volume: 73
  start-page: 661
  issue: 4
  year: 2000
  end-page: 93
  article-title: ‘CEO Stock‐Based Compensation: An Empirical Analysis of Incentive‐Intensity, Relative Mix, and Economic Determinants’
  publication-title: Journal of Business
– volume: 79
  start-page: 251
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  end-page: 75
  article-title: ‘SFAS No. 123 Stock‐Based Compensation Expense and Equity Market Values’
  publication-title: The Accounting Review
– volume: 21
  start-page: 297
  issue: 3
  year: 1996
  end-page: 318
  article-title: ‘Investment Opportunities and the Structure of Executive Compensation’
  publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics
– volume: 11
  start-page: 203
  issue: 2‐3
  year: 2006
  end-page: 45
  article-title: ‘Which Approach to Accounting for Employee Stock Options Best Reflects Market Pricing?’
  publication-title: Review of Accounting Studies
– volume: 36
  start-page: 253
  issue: 3‐4
  year: 2009
  end-page: 88
  article-title: ‘Scale Effects in Capital Markets‐Based Accounting Research’
  publication-title: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting
– volume: 118
  start-page: 107
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  end-page: 55
  article-title: ‘Corporate Governance and Equity Prices’
  publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Economics
– volume: 22
  start-page: 109
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  end-page: 38
  article-title: ‘Governance and the Split of Options between Executive and Nonexecutive Employees’
  publication-title: Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance
– volume: 30
  start-page: 5
  issue: 2
  year: 2001
  end-page: 44
  article-title: ‘The Efficiency of Equity‐Linked Compensation: Understanding the Full Cost of Awarding Executive Stock Options’
  publication-title: Financial Management
– volume: 13
  start-page: 527
  issue: 2
  year: 1996
  end-page: 67
  article-title: ‘The Effects of Cross‐Sectional Scale Differences on Regression Results in Empirical Accounting Research’
  publication-title: Contemporary Accounting Research
– volume: 33
  start-page: 3
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  end-page: 42
  article-title: ‘Stock Options for Undiversified Executives’
  publication-title: Journal of Accounting and Economics
– ident: e_1_2_8_30_1
  doi: 10.2139/ssrn.527822
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1177/0148558X0502000401
– ident: e_1_2_8_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.008
– ident: e_1_2_8_31_1
  doi: 10.1177/0148558X0702200203
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01208.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_27_1
  doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhm077
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.2.327
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(96)00439-9
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
  doi: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.971
– ident: e_1_2_8_35_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.01357.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00062-9
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1009630100586
– ident: e_1_2_8_21_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_22_1
  doi: 10.1162/00335530360535162
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
  doi: 10.1086/209658
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00514.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_23_1
  doi: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.2.483
– ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1011377902967
– ident: e_1_2_8_28_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00258-1
– ident: e_1_2_8_33_1
  doi: 10.2307/3666404
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02133.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
  doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1561923
– ident: e_1_2_8_34_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00049-4
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(96)00421-1
– ident: e_1_2_8_24_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00050-7
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00017-2
– ident: e_1_2_8_32_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11142-006-9008-x
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11142-008-9068-1
– start-page: 247
  volume-title: Handbook of Management Accounting Research
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_8_29_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Lambert R.
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1012306
– ident: e_1_2_8_26_1
  doi: 10.1111/1468-5957.00459
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00019-1
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.251
SSID ssj0002167
Score 2.1117034
Snippet :  In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option‐based compensation to restricted stock‐based compensation....
In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option‐based compensation to restricted stock‐based compensation....
In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option-based compensation to restricted stock-based compensation....
SourceID proquest
crossref
repec
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 395
SubjectTerms Book value
Compensation
Endogeneity
Enterprises
Financial research
Firm value
Options on stocks
Restricted stock
Securities markets
stock compensation
Stock options
Stocks
Studies
U.S.A
Valuation
Valuation methods
Title The Valuation Differences Between Stock Option and Restricted Stock Grants for US Firms
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-G6WGZ6KB-F/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1468-5957.2011.02235.x
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/blajbfnac/v_3a38_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a3-4_3ap_3a395-412.htm
https://www.proquest.com/docview/869175867
https://search.proquest.com/docview/963634293
Volume 38
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQKyEuUF4iFCofELeskjh-5NilzZZWFKll2RUXy7EdUZamq2wWtf31HTvJolQcEOIQx4oVJ37M-BvnywxC7wpTMmJ0BmaJsWFKVRQqakhIdVYaGilNfEiWT6fsaJoez-m84z-5f2Fa_xCbDTcnGV5fOwFXxeq-kIuQZpR3njhhpaMjhydjwh276-DstyepJPbBZB1CDplg8yGp548VDVaqbdfp1wMYul3bpdVDUOtXpfwJWvTtackoi9G6KUb69p6rx__T4B30uAOveL-dbU_RA1s9Qw977vxzNINJh7_27sPxQRd8BVQRHrd8MHzegALGn72iwqoy-My6yCEagG9XNqkdNQcDmMbTc5xf1JerF2iaH375cBR2kRtCTQF_hYmLRm_iMhNWF4DxuBWl4twmKU-UykRieWQo1TYqYq0NEWCUWjhn2tAkBfv-Jdqqrir7CmEGFpwCVKHAFE1jGwlFANMIBfUTankZoLgfJblsHXTIgWEjpOsx6XpM-h6T1wF674dzc4OqF47gxqmcnU7khM0m39jJWOYB2u3HW3ayvZKCgYlLBeMBwptSEEr3pUVV9mq9kqDVGIGVngTo0M-SzZOKn-pHUVZKy1-SQFMguYHDvx1RF-6aTCFdulxGZRon8ntzGSDup8ZfN1Eej_N9l339z3fuokftBrqjKb1BW029tm8BgTXFHsjWycc9L2F3EuYgtg
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,1378,4018,27938,27939,46308,46732
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwELfQKgEvjE-RjQ8_IN5SJXHsOI8rW1r2UaRtpRUvlmM7YmzLqjRFg7-es5MUZeIBIR7iWLHi5Gzf3e-cyx1C73JdMKJVCmaJNn5MZeBLqolPVVpoGkhFXEqWkymbzOLDBV206YDsvzBNfIjNhpvlDCevLYPbDem7XM59mtKkDcUJqo4OAVAOgPuJTWewf_o7llQUunSyFiP7jLNF363njz31dNXADvttD4gOKrM0qg9rnV7KttFVR1HjjnI5XNf5UP28E-zxP5H8GD1q8SveaxbcE3TPlE_R_c59_hmaw7rDn7sI4ni_zb8C0giPGpcwfFaDDMafnKzCstT41NjkIQqwb9s2rqx3DgY8jWdnOLuorlfP0Sw7OP8w8dvkDb6iAMH8yCak12GRcqNygHmJ4YVMEhPFSSRlyiOTBJpSZYI8VEoTDnapgXOqNI1iMPFfoK3ypjQvEWZgxEkAFhKs0Tg0AZcEYA2X0D-hJik8FHbTJJZNjA7Rs224sCMm7IgJN2Li1kPv3XxubpDVpfVxS6iYT8dizObjL-xoJDIP7XYTLlr2XgnOwMqlnCUewptW4Ev7sUWW5ma9EiDYGAFlTzx04JbJ5kn5lfyWF6VU4rsgQAoUP-Bwb0fkhb0mYiiXtpZSEYeR-Fpfeyhxa-OvSRSHo2zPVnf--c636MHk_ORYHH-cHu2ih81-uvVaeoW26mptXgMgq_M3jtF-AVTaI9c
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Nb9MwFLfQKk1cYHyJsAE-IG6pkjh2nONKl44NCtoorbhYju1ooyyr0hQN_nqenaQoEweEOMSxYsWJP97z7zm_vIfQq1wXjGiVglmijR9TGfiSauJTlRaaBlIRF5Ll_ZQdz-KTBV20_Cf7L0zjH2K74WYlw-lrK-ArXdwWcu7TlCatJ05Y6egQ8OQgZiSw9K7x2W9XUlHooslaiOwzzhZ9Vs8fa-otVQPb6zc9HDqozMqoPqp1y1J2Hy27BjVslOVwU-dD9fOWr8f_0-I9dK9Fr_iwmW4P0B1TPkS7HXn-EZrDrMOfO__heNxGXwFdhEcNIQyf16CB8QenqbAsNT4zNnSIAuTblk0qy83BgKbx7Bxnl9XV-jGaZUef3hz7begGX1EAYH5kw9HrsEi5UTmAvMTwQiaJieIkkjLlkUkCTakyQR4qpQkHq9TAOVWaRjEY-E_QTnldmqcIMzDhJMAKCbZoHJqASwKghkuon1CTFB4Ku1ESq8ZDh-hZNlzYHhO2x4TrMXHjodduOLc3yGppGW4JFfPpREzYfPKFnY5E5qH9brxFK9xrwRnYuJSzxEN4WwpSaT-1yNJcb9YC1BojsNQTDx25WbJ9Uv5Nfs2LUirxXRBoCiQ_4HBvR-SlvSZiSFc2l1IRh5G4qK88lLip8ddNFCej7NBmn_3znS_R7sdxJt69nZ7uo7vNZrqlLB2gnbramOeAxur8hROzX7T8IoY
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Valuation+Differences+Between+Stock+Option+and+Restricted+Stock+Grants+for+US+Firms&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+business+finance+%26+accounting&rft.au=Irving%2C+James+H.&rft.au=Landsman%2C+Wayne+R.&rft.au=Lindsey%2C+Bradley+P.&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0306-686X&rft.eissn=1468-5957&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3%E2%80%904&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1468-5957.2011.02235.x&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fj.1468-5957.2011.02235.x&rft.externalDocID=JBFA2235
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0306-686X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0306-686X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0306-686X&client=summon