Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch
There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches ha...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry Vol. 97; no. 4; pp. 200 - 208 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Mosby, Inc
01.04.2007
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios.
The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation.
A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (ΔE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 ΔE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 ΔE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits.
The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 ΔE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 ΔE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different (
P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap.
Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth. |
---|---|
AbstractList | There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios.STATEMENT OF PROBLEMThere is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios.The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation.PURPOSEThe goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation.A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (DeltaE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 DeltaE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 DeltaE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits.MATERIAL AND METHODSA test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (DeltaE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 DeltaE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 DeltaE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits.The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 DeltaE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 DeltaE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different (P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap.RESULTSThe predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 DeltaE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 DeltaE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different (P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap.Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth.CONCLUSIONSTolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth. There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios. The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation. A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (ΔE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 ΔE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 ΔE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 ΔE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 ΔE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different ( P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap. Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth. Statement of problem There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios. Purpose The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation. Material and methods A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (ΔE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 ΔE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 ΔE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits. Results The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 ΔE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 ΔE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different ( P <.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap. Conclusions Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth. There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios. The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation. A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (DeltaE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 DeltaE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 DeltaE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 DeltaE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 DeltaE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different (P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap. Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth. |
Author | Douglas, R. Duane Wee, Alvin G. Steinhauer, Tad J. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: R. Duane surname: Douglas fullname: Douglas, R. Duane email: rodougl@siue.edu organization: Associate Professor and Section Head of Fixed Prosthodontics, Southern Illinois University of Dental Medicine – sequence: 2 givenname: Tad J. surname: Steinhauer fullname: Steinhauer, Tad J. organization: Assistant Professor and Section Head of Removable Prosthodontics, Southern Illinois University of Dental Medicine – sequence: 3 givenname: Alvin G. surname: Wee fullname: Wee, Alvin G. organization: Associate Professor in Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Maxillofacial Prosthodontist, Arthur James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17499089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNks1r3DAQxUVJaDZp_4XgU292R_6SDaW0hH4EAjkkhd7EWBqz2tjSVtIG9r-v3N1QyKHpSTC89zT83pyzE-ssMXbJoeDA2_ebYutd0GRjUQKIAsoCePmKrTj0Im-7mp-wFUBZ5lXPqzN2HsIGALpG8NfsjIu676HrV-zh2kaPzuOUaYrkZ2MxGmczN2ZxTVl0E3m0ipbB8p0JMWSj89mWvKJtNIOZTNxnaHWGapngcZIMYY2astmEGaNav2GnI06B3h7fC_bj65f7q-_5ze2366vPN7lq6jLmqtPNwJEjou6Gpua1IoBRqFqUFdctdqJWQreqVFDVI_VDo3sSHATWpGCsLti7Q25C9GtHIcq0gaJpQktuF6SAJrFqmyS8PAp3w0xabr2Z0e_lE54kaA8ClWAHT-NfCcilB7mRTz3IpQcJpUzZyfjhmVGZ-Adsom2ml-2fDnZKmB4NeRmUodSCNp5UlNqZlyM-PotQk7FG4fRAewobt_M2lSC5DMkg75ZbWU4FBAAH-PnvgP_Z4DdyadWX |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_01_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2016_04_003 crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjp030 crossref_primary_10_3390_ma8115379 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2013_11_017 crossref_primary_10_1179_14653121141434 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2014_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41405_023_00143_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2014_04_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2022_104223 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_10_60185_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2014_01_008 crossref_primary_10_1590_1678_775720150550 crossref_primary_10_1080_21681163_2022_2130824 crossref_primary_10_4103_jasmr_jasmr_20_22 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_06_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2022_06_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_12_60168_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60129_8 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12109 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12465 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enbuild_2017_08_017 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12559 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_017_0419_9 crossref_primary_10_5395_JKACD_2011_36_4_306 crossref_primary_10_1002_cre2_22 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2016_12_010 crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2019_11_4_193 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_08_007 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8240_2010_00370_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2017_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_06_001 crossref_primary_10_2478_bjdm_2018_0015 crossref_primary_10_5301_ijao_5000579 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2021_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xaor_2025_02_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_06_004 crossref_primary_10_1590_S1678_77572010000600006 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12906_018_2281_y crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_11_60006_1 crossref_primary_10_4103_jpbs_jpbs_218_21 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12572 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_02_015 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12783 crossref_primary_10_17214_gaziaot_1123071 crossref_primary_10_3390_dj11120275 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60290_5 crossref_primary_10_34084_bshr_1495495 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods5030047 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_02_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60110_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12335 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2021_04_029 crossref_primary_10_1002_j_0022_0337_2010_74_9_tb04956_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fdj_2017_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2020_05_003 crossref_primary_10_2341_09_344_C crossref_primary_10_1089_pho_2014_3722 crossref_primary_10_14260_jemds_2021_528 crossref_primary_10_3109_00016357_2013_777114 crossref_primary_10_4103_ccd_ccd_301_18 crossref_primary_10_3390_nano12132187 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2020_103472 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_92733_8 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12126 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00265_021_03071_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_023_02825_2 crossref_primary_10_7126_cumudj_957975 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2020_02_002 crossref_primary_10_17567_currresdentsci_1520485 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmbbm_2018_09_039 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2019_103208 crossref_primary_10_2174_1874210601913010364 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2008_06_003 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12594 crossref_primary_10_12677_acm_2024_1441124 crossref_primary_10_4028_www_scientific_net_KEM_587_360 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13894 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2009_00465_x crossref_primary_10_2341_20_155_L crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_09_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2013_07_001 crossref_primary_10_26477_jbcd_v34i3_3216 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00056_023_00453_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2023_07_035 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2009_04_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2012_04_023 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_73591 crossref_primary_10_14815_kjdm_2018_45_4_233 crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2013_5_3_262 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_09_60001_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2012_10_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpor_2015_03_001 crossref_primary_10_3390_app14104025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2012_09_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2014_11_003 crossref_primary_10_2186_jpr_JPR_D_21_00025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_09_016 crossref_primary_10_4012_dmj_2021_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2018_08_298 crossref_primary_10_3390_app13158914 crossref_primary_10_3390_dj12090284 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12149 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12759 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_012_0680_x crossref_primary_10_3390_dj13010043 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_018_0361_6 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_12201 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_matdes_2010_05_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2025_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_09_60085_8 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12195 crossref_primary_10_1590_2177_6709_21_2_081_087_oar crossref_primary_10_1007_s41779_024_00991_2 crossref_primary_10_2341_14_080_L crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2012_04_011 crossref_primary_10_1111_eje_12355 crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2015_7_5_400 crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2016_8_6_449 crossref_primary_10_1155_2024_2540174 crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2022_14_5_324 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12373 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12132 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2020_103502 crossref_primary_10_1177_0022034510376772 crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2014_6_2_71 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12740 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2013_02_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_09_028 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2013_02_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2014_05_024 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12625 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_009_0329_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joen_2011_04_014 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2012_00918_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2014_09_003 crossref_primary_10_17567_ataunidfd_522592 crossref_primary_10_1111_adj_12099 crossref_primary_10_18231_j_aprd_2023_020 crossref_primary_10_1002_jemt_22561 crossref_primary_10_17135_jdhs_2017_17_6_481 crossref_primary_10_2341_08_64 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2025_e42169 crossref_primary_10_1038_srep18498 crossref_primary_10_3109_00016357_2014_967720 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_13_60387_X crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_05_007 crossref_primary_10_1590_1678_7757_2017_0536 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_013_1118_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12604 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_014_1272_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pdpdt_2020_102151 crossref_primary_10_33808_clinexphealthsci_816231 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_12781 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1741_2358_2011_00458_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_018_2744_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_020_00554_4 crossref_primary_10_2341_08_74 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_08_010 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_013_0106_5 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_13245 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_08_005 crossref_primary_10_4041_kjod_2015_45_3_130 crossref_primary_10_1177_0022034510378012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2011_07_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_07_013 crossref_primary_10_1002_col_21896 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12649 crossref_primary_10_1002_col_21882 crossref_primary_10_4103_1735_3327_332100 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2842_2010_02120_x crossref_primary_10_4047_jkap_2020_58_1_1 crossref_primary_10_2341_13_371_L crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2020_12_015 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_024_06124_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12953 crossref_primary_10_3109_00016357_2011_654250 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12717 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_3244 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12955 crossref_primary_10_1080_19424396_2010_12221779 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13805 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_024_00998_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2009_07_009 crossref_primary_10_1080_02726351_2021_1895385 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_024_04693_w crossref_primary_10_14347_jtd_2021_43_3_77 crossref_primary_10_2334_josnusd_24_0344 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_11_60025_5 crossref_primary_10_13065_jksdh_2016_16_05_695 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jds_2017_07_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sdentj_2021_02_002 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_13146 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2012_11_009 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_2164 crossref_primary_10_1108_RPJ_04_2022_0136 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58030457 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_06_003 crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2019_11_5_286 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_017_2088_0 crossref_primary_10_32322_jhsm_1180255 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pdpdt_2016_04_016 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_13297 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_11_60091_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60282_6 crossref_primary_10_2341_20_222_C crossref_primary_10_4028_www_scientific_net_KEM_544_105 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2018_02_022 crossref_primary_10_1111_iej_13708 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpor_2018_07_005 crossref_primary_10_2341_21_209_C crossref_primary_10_3390_app13010181 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12641 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2009_03_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_12_60102_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2018_09_011 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8240_2009_00312_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_012_0069_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_07_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_12_012 crossref_primary_10_33715_inonusaglik_1027774 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmbbm_2021_105061 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2015_08_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2011_08_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_11_60136_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2016_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_023_03535_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jphotobiol_2016_04_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_10_60116_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8240_2012_00538_x crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12195 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_13_60323_6 crossref_primary_10_2186_ajps_12_150 crossref_primary_10_3390_ma14071768 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sdentj_2023_11_008 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12728 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jds_2020_06_023 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8240_2010_00347_x crossref_primary_10_14347_kadt_2015_37_4_199 crossref_primary_10_1155_2018_4985030 crossref_primary_10_4103_jfmpc_jfmpc_803_19 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pdpdt_2017_10_024 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2012_00915_x crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12309 crossref_primary_10_1002_col_22011 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1741_2358_2012_00657_x crossref_primary_10_1590_pboci_2024_079 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_3679 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_016_0287_9 crossref_primary_10_15171_joddd_2019_011 crossref_primary_10_15171_joddd_2019_010 crossref_primary_10_1002_cre2_524 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10031_1164 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_12616 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10015_2422 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2009_06_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ortho_2015_06_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2017_03_009 crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0b013e3182413bfa crossref_primary_10_2341_18_184_C crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12353 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2020_11_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2018_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_09_013 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_018_0365_2 crossref_primary_10_34172_doh_2021_08 crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2015_7_5_368 crossref_primary_10_5395_rde_2012_37_2_90 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60289_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ortho_2015_06_013 crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12099 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_023_02263_9 crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2013_5_3_319 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2012_12_003 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13676 crossref_primary_10_4028_www_scientific_net_KEM_492_349 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2010_10_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_07_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_ma13214726 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_07_001 crossref_primary_10_3109_00016357_2014_913195 crossref_primary_10_2341_13_333_LR crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2015_10_015 crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2018_10_6_422 crossref_primary_10_3390_dj12020024 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_44246_8 crossref_primary_10_14368_jdras_2021_37_4_199 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2013_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_iej_12423 crossref_primary_10_2174_1874210601812010884 crossref_primary_10_4103_JCD_JCD_401_20 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_08_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_07_004 crossref_primary_10_2334_josnusd_16_0636 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_71227 crossref_primary_10_3390_ceramics8010014 crossref_primary_10_4047_jkap_2011_49_4_308 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_020_03414_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_cre2_70091 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2008_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1177_23202068221129025 crossref_primary_10_1002_col_21821 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_3780 crossref_primary_10_4028_www_scientific_net_KEM_492_362 crossref_primary_10_1111_maec_12133 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_1004 crossref_primary_10_1111_joor_12194 crossref_primary_10_1002_cre2_555 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2017_04_031 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2009_03_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60083_9 crossref_primary_10_4047_jkap_2011_49_2_161 crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12131 crossref_primary_10_15436_2379_1705_15_14 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2011_00808_x crossref_primary_10_14815_kjdm_2023_50_3_121 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2011_11_009 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2010_00610_x crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_13406 crossref_primary_10_3390_polym15020397 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2011_11_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60155_9 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/0022-3913(82)90372-9 10.1016/0022-3913(70)90140-X 10.1016/S0022-3913(84)80001-3 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70033-3 10.1177/154405910208100815 10.1111/j.1520-6378.1979.tb00094.x 10.1002/1520-6378(200008)25:4<278::AID-COL8>3.0.CO;2-F 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70049-6 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00494.x 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90099-X 10.1067/mpr.2003.60 10.1177/00220345890680120801 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80121-2 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90077-0 10.1067/mpr.2002.125727 10.1177/00220345890680120701 10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80081-7 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70233-1 10.1177/00220345890680051301 10.1177/00220345950740011401 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2007 The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2007 The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry – notice: The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Dentistry |
EISSN | 1097-6841 |
EndPage | 208 |
ExternalDocumentID | 17499089 10_1016_j_prosdent_2007_02_012 S002239130700100X 1_s2_0_S002239130700100X |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .55 .FO .~1 0R~ 123 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 6PF 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAGKA AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV C45 CAG COF CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HDX HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LH1 M27 M41 MJL MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OB- OM. OVD OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SDF SDG SEL SES SEW SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K TEORI UHS UNMZH WUQ X7M Z5R ZGI ZXP ~G- AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW PKN RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AHPSJ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR ZA5 AAYXX AGRNS CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-c8d5b1a1aaad8b5414ce00f7c47231d6a874c7d6c2c034fe9b5d9e7107a4ec0f3 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0022-3913 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 01:14:24 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:09:29 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:05:06 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:34 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:32:20 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:19:03 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 20:19:09 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c542t-c8d5b1a1aaad8b5414ce00f7c47231d6a874c7d6c2c034fe9b5d9e7107a4ec0f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 17499089 |
PQID | 70501265 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_70501265 pubmed_primary_17499089 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2007_02_012 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_prosdent_2007_02_012 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_prosdent_2007_02_012 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S002239130700100X elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_prosdent_2007_02_012 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2007-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2007-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2007 text: 2007-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Prosthet Dent |
PublicationYear | 2007 |
Publisher | Mosby, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Mosby, Inc |
References | Okubo, Kanawati, Richards, Childress (bib8) 1998; 80 Wee, Monaghan, Johnston (bib14) 2002; 87 Hammad (bib7) 2003; 89 Bangtson, Goodkind (bib11) 1982; 48 Johnston, Kao (bib23) 1989; 68 Milleding, Haag, Neroth, Renz (bib2) 1998; 11 Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) (bib17) 1978 Douglas, Brewer (bib22) 1998; 79 Culpepper (bib4) 1970; 24 Bergman, Nilson, Andersson (bib3) 1999; 12 Seghi, Johnston, O'Brien (bib13) 1989; 68 Paul, Peter, Pietrobon, Hammerle (bib9) 2002; 81 Kuehni, Marcus (bib18) 1979; 4 O'Brien, Hemmendinger, Boenke, Linger, Groh (bib10) 1997; 13 Goodkind, Keenan, Schwabacher (bib12) 1985; 53 ten Bosch, Coops (bib16) 1995; 74 MacEntee, Lakowski (bib15) 1981; 8 Goldstein, Lancaster (bib1) 1984; 52 Haselton, Diaz-Arnold, Hillis (bib5) 2000; 83 Ruyter, Nilner, Moller (bib20) 1987; 3 Ragain, Johnston (bib21) 2000; 25 Seghi, Hewlett, Kim (bib19) 1989; 68 van der Burgt, ten Bosch, Borsboom, Kortsmit (bib6) 1990; 63 MacEntee (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib15) 1981; 8 ten Bosch (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib16) 1995; 74 van der Burgt (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib6) 1990; 63 Ruyter (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib20) 1987; 3 Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib17) 1978 Ragain (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib21) 2000; 25 Milleding (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib2) 1998; 11 Goldstein (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib1) 1984; 52 Haselton (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib5) 2000; 83 Culpepper (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib4) 1970; 24 Goodkind (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib12) 1985; 53 Douglas (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib22) 1998; 79 Paul (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib9) 2002; 81 Okubo (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib8) 1998; 80 Wee (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib14) 2002; 87 Bergman (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib3) 1999; 12 Seghi (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib13) 1989; 68 O'Brien (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib10) 1997; 13 Kuehni (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib18) 1979; 4 Seghi (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib19) 1989; 68 Bangtson (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib11) 1982; 48 Johnston (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib23) 1989; 68 Hammad (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib7) 2003; 89 19368605 - J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21(2):133-9 |
References_xml | – volume: 8 start-page: 203 year: 1981 end-page: 208 ident: bib15 article-title: Instrumental colour measurement of vital and extracted human teeth publication-title: J Oral Rehabil – volume: 68 start-page: 1755 year: 1989 end-page: 1759 ident: bib13 article-title: Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains publication-title: J Dent Res – volume: 48 start-page: 610 year: 1982 end-page: 617 ident: bib11 article-title: The conversion of Chromascan designations to CIE tristimulus values publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 63 start-page: 155 year: 1990 end-page: 162 ident: bib6 article-title: A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 53 start-page: 105 year: 1985 end-page: 109 ident: bib12 article-title: A comparison of Chromascan and spectrophotometric color measurements of 100 natural teeth publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 79 start-page: 254 year: 1998 end-page: 260 ident: bib22 article-title: Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 24 start-page: 166 year: 1970 end-page: 173 ident: bib4 article-title: A comparative study of shade-matching procedures publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 68 start-page: 1760 year: 1989 end-page: 1764 ident: bib19 article-title: Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain publication-title: J Dent Res – volume: 83 start-page: 396 year: 2000 end-page: 401 ident: bib5 article-title: Clinical assessment of high-strength all-ceramic crowns publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 89 start-page: 50 year: 2003 end-page: 53 ident: bib7 article-title: Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 11 start-page: 224 year: 1998 end-page: 232 ident: bib2 article-title: Two years of clinical experience with Procera titanium crowns publication-title: Int J Prosthodont – volume: 4 start-page: 83 year: 1979 end-page: 91 ident: bib18 article-title: An experiment in visual scaling of small color differences publication-title: Col Res Appl – volume: 81 start-page: 578 year: 2002 end-page: 582 ident: bib9 article-title: Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth publication-title: J Dent Res – volume: 25 start-page: 278 year: 2000 end-page: 285 ident: bib21 article-title: Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers publication-title: Col Res Appl – volume: 52 start-page: 775 year: 1984 end-page: 780 ident: bib1 article-title: Survey of patient attitudes toward current esthetic procedures publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 3 start-page: 246 year: 1987 end-page: 251 ident: bib20 article-title: Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers publication-title: Dent Mater – volume: 68 start-page: 819 year: 1989 end-page: 822 ident: bib23 article-title: Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry publication-title: J Dent Res – volume: 12 start-page: 135 year: 1999 end-page: 139 ident: bib3 article-title: A longitudinal clinical study of Procera ceramic-veneered titanium copings publication-title: Int J Prosthodont – volume: 74 start-page: 374 year: 1995 end-page: 380 ident: bib16 article-title: Tooth color and reflectance as related to light scattering and enamel hardness publication-title: J Dent Res – volume: 80 start-page: 642 year: 1998 end-page: 648 ident: bib8 article-title: Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – year: 1978 ident: bib17 article-title: Recommendations on uniform color spaces, color-difference equations, psychometric color terms. Supplement No. 2 of publication CIE No. 15 (E-1.3.1) ed – volume: 13 start-page: 179 year: 1997 end-page: 185 ident: bib10 article-title: Color distribution of three regions of extracted human teeth publication-title: Dent Mater – volume: 87 start-page: 657 year: 2002 end-page: 666 ident: bib14 article-title: Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain publication-title: J Prosthet Dent – volume: 48 start-page: 610 year: 1982 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib11 article-title: The conversion of Chromascan designations to CIE tristimulus values publication-title: J Prosthet Dent doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(82)90372-9 – volume: 24 start-page: 166 year: 1970 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib4 article-title: A comparative study of shade-matching procedures publication-title: J Prosthet Dent doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(70)90140-X – volume: 52 start-page: 775 year: 1984 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib1 article-title: Survey of patient attitudes toward current esthetic procedures publication-title: J Prosthet Dent doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(84)80001-3 – volume: 83 start-page: 396 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib5 article-title: Clinical assessment of high-strength all-ceramic crowns publication-title: J Prosthet Dent doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70033-3 – year: 1978 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib17 – volume: 81 start-page: 578 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib9 article-title: Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth publication-title: J Dent Res doi: 10.1177/154405910208100815 – volume: 4 start-page: 83 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib18 article-title: An experiment in visual scaling of small color differences publication-title: Col Res Appl doi: 10.1111/j.1520-6378.1979.tb00094.x – volume: 25 start-page: 278 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib21 article-title: Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers publication-title: Col Res Appl doi: 10.1002/1520-6378(200008)25:4<278::AID-COL8>3.0.CO;2-F – volume: 80 start-page: 642 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib8 article-title: Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching publication-title: J Prosthet Dent doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70049-6 – volume: 8 start-page: 203 year: 1981 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib15 article-title: Instrumental colour measurement of vital and extracted human teeth publication-title: J Oral Rehabil doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00494.x – volume: 63 start-page: 155 year: 1990 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib6 article-title: A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color publication-title: J Prosthet Dent doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90099-X – volume: 89 start-page: 50 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib7 article-title: Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides publication-title: J Prosthet Dent doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.60 – volume: 11 start-page: 224 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib2 article-title: Two years of clinical experience with Procera titanium crowns publication-title: Int J Prosthodont – volume: 68 start-page: 1760 year: 1989 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib19 article-title: Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain publication-title: J Dent Res doi: 10.1177/00220345890680120801 – volume: 13 start-page: 179 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib10 article-title: Color distribution of three regions of extracted human teeth publication-title: Dent Mater doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80121-2 – volume: 53 start-page: 105 year: 1985 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib12 article-title: A comparison of Chromascan and spectrophotometric color measurements of 100 natural teeth publication-title: J Prosthet Dent doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90077-0 – volume: 87 start-page: 657 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib14 article-title: Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain publication-title: J Prosthet Dent doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.125727 – volume: 12 start-page: 135 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib3 article-title: A longitudinal clinical study of Procera ceramic-veneered titanium copings publication-title: Int J Prosthodont – volume: 68 start-page: 1755 year: 1989 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib13 article-title: Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains publication-title: J Dent Res doi: 10.1177/00220345890680120701 – volume: 3 start-page: 246 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib20 article-title: Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers publication-title: Dent Mater doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80081-7 – volume: 79 start-page: 254 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib22 article-title: Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns publication-title: J Prosthet Dent doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70233-1 – volume: 68 start-page: 819 year: 1989 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib23 article-title: Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry publication-title: J Dent Res doi: 10.1177/00220345890680051301 – volume: 74 start-page: 374 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib16 article-title: Tooth color and reflectance as related to light scattering and enamel hardness publication-title: J Dent Res doi: 10.1177/00220345950740011401 – reference: 19368605 - J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21(2):133-9 |
SSID | ssj0008571 |
Score | 2.3727496 |
Snippet | There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is... Statement of problem There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 200 |
SubjectTerms | Chi-Square Distribution Color Color Perception Colorimetry - instrumentation Colorimetry - methods Dentistry Dentists - psychology Dentures Female Humans Incisor Male Prosthesis Coloring - psychology Regression Analysis |
Title | Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S002239130700100X https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S002239130700100X https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17499089 https://www.proquest.com/docview/70501265 |
Volume | 97 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwEB7xOLSXqqWvBQo-9BrWcfxIjoiCliI4FWlvlmM7Aoqyq2Y59NLf3pmNs4AQatUeM8nIkWc889meB8BnrUMZvTCZrgqVofXTWelkyGrHa6VE1cRlevT5hZ5cyq9TNV2DoyEXhsIqk-3vbfrSWifKOM3meH59TTm-6NqqnJQWNxV8ug6b-KxRtTcPT88mFyuDXCqTr4qGI8ODROEbslMdpcSmaobigOfiOR_1HAZd-qKT1_AqgUh22P_nG1iL7Ra8-EKBP9S77S18P6UzW0q-Z2GIdyEJsFnDEPGxxew2UkeNSITQ83UM8Subp0CXZczsT-bawJwniksUZOiuXIgMFQTRrr96B5cnx9-OJllqq5B5JcUi82VQde5y51woa2oD7iPnjfHSINgL2pVGehO0F54XsolVrUIVEYkYJ6PnTfEeNtpZGz8CMzWXUtVOFiTg3JTKi-hDgSCxElzHEahhIq1PNcep9cWtHYLLbuwgAGqIaSwXFgUwgvGKb95X3fgjhxnkZIecUrSCFh3Dv3HGLi3mzua2wy_tE4UbQbXifKSzfzXq_qBMFuVFtzSujbO7zhqu8L1WI_jQ69j9DBjcnvKy2v6PcXfgZX86TbFHu7Cx-HEXPyGsWtR7sH7wK99Li-c3tJ4kcw |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB6VcigXRHluodQHruk6jh_JsSpUW2h7aqW9WY7tqC9lV2R74MJvZyZxtiBUgeA68ciR5_U5mQfAB61DGb0wma4KlaH301npZMhqx2ulRNXEvjz69EzPLuTnuZpvwOFYC0Nplcn3Dz6999aJMk2nOV1eXVGNL4a2KielxUsFnz-CxxLNl6xz__t9nkepTL5uGY7LfyoTviYv1VFBbOplKPZ5Lh6KUA8h0D4SHT2DpwlCsoPhLbdhI7bPYesjpf3Q5LYXcHNMX2yp9J6FMduFzp8tGoZ4j60Wt5HmaUQihIGvY4he2TKlufQZs9-YawNzniguUZChu3QhMlQPxLr-8iVcHH06P5xlaahC5pUUq8yXQdW5y51zoaxpCLiPnDfGS4NQL2hXGulN0F54XsgmVrUKVUQcYpyMnjfFK9hsF218A8zUXEpVO1mQeHNTKi-iDwVCxEpwHSegxoO0PnUcp8EXt3ZMLbu2owBoHKaxXFgUwASma77l0HPjjxxmlJMdK0rRB1oMC__GGbtkyp3NbYcr7W_qNoFqzfmLxv7VrnujMlmUF_2jcW1c3HXWcIXPtZrA60HH7k_A4OWUl9XOf-y7B1uz89MTe3J89uUtPBm-U1MW0jvYXH29i7sIsFb1-96AfgAihCU3 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoral+determination+of+the+tolerance+of+dentists+for+perceptibility+and+acceptability+of+shade+mismatch&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+prosthetic+dentistry&rft.au=Douglas%2C+R.+Duane%2C+DMD%2C+MS&rft.au=Steinhauer%2C+Tad+J.%2C+DMD&rft.au=Wee%2C+Alvin+G.%2C+DDS%2C+MS%2C+MPH&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=200&rft.epage=208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.prosdent.2007.02.012&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S002239130700100X&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S002239130700100X |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00223913%2FS0022391307X01872%2Fcov150h.gif |