Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch

There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches ha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of prosthetic dentistry Vol. 97; no. 4; pp. 200 - 208
Main Authors Douglas, R. Duane, Steinhauer, Tad J., Wee, Alvin G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Mosby, Inc 01.04.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios. The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation. A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (ΔE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 ΔE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 ΔE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 ΔE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 ΔE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different ( P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap. Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth.
AbstractList There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios.STATEMENT OF PROBLEMThere is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios.The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation.PURPOSEThe goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation.A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (DeltaE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 DeltaE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 DeltaE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits.MATERIAL AND METHODSA test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (DeltaE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 DeltaE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 DeltaE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits.The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 DeltaE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 DeltaE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different (P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap.RESULTSThe predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 DeltaE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 DeltaE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different (P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap.Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth.CONCLUSIONSTolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth.
There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios. The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation. A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (ΔE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 ΔE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 ΔE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 ΔE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 ΔE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different ( P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap. Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth.
Statement of problem There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios. Purpose The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation. Material and methods A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (ΔE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 ΔE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 ΔE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits. Results The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 ΔE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 ΔE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different ( P <.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap. Conclusions Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth.
There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is considered perceivable to observers. Most studies attempting to determine perceptibility and acceptability of tolerances for shade mismatches have been conducted under in vitro conditions that are not applicable to clinical scenarios. The goal of this study was to determine valid acceptability and perceptibility tolerances for shade mismatch in an actual clinical scenario using spectroradiometric instrumentation. A test denture was fabricated that allowed 10 maxillary left central incisors of varying shade mismatch with the right central incisor to be interchanged within the denture base. A spectroradiometer was used to determine the CIELAB coordinates and color differences (DeltaE) between the right central incisor and the interchangeable left central incisor denture teeth. The interchangeable denture teeth ranged uniformly from 1 DeltaE unit (visually undetectable) to greater than 10 DeltaE units (an obvious shade mismatch). The test denture with each of the interchangeable teeth was modeled by a subject to 28 dentists in a clinical setting. For each of the interchangeable teeth, dentist observers were asked if they could see a difference between the central incisors and, if so, whether the difference was acceptable. A Probit regression analysis was used to predict acceptability and perceptibility tolerances with 95% confidence limits. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the dentist observers could perceive a color difference (50/50 perceptibility) was 2.6 DeltaE units. The predicted color difference at which 50% of the subjects would remake the restoration due to color mismatch (clinically unacceptable color match) was 5.5 DeltaE. Acceptability and perceptibility color tolerances at the 50/50 level were significantly different (P<.05), as their 95% confidence limits did not overlap. Tolerances for perceptibility were significantly lower than tolerances for acceptability for shade mismatch between 2 denture teeth.
Author Douglas, R. Duane
Wee, Alvin G.
Steinhauer, Tad J.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: R. Duane
  surname: Douglas
  fullname: Douglas, R. Duane
  email: rodougl@siue.edu
  organization: Associate Professor and Section Head of Fixed Prosthodontics, Southern Illinois University of Dental Medicine
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Tad J.
  surname: Steinhauer
  fullname: Steinhauer, Tad J.
  organization: Assistant Professor and Section Head of Removable Prosthodontics, Southern Illinois University of Dental Medicine
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Alvin G.
  surname: Wee
  fullname: Wee, Alvin G.
  organization: Associate Professor in Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Maxillofacial Prosthodontist, Arthur James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17499089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNks1r3DAQxUVJaDZp_4XgU292R_6SDaW0hH4EAjkkhd7EWBqz2tjSVtIG9r-v3N1QyKHpSTC89zT83pyzE-ssMXbJoeDA2_ebYutd0GRjUQKIAsoCePmKrTj0Im-7mp-wFUBZ5lXPqzN2HsIGALpG8NfsjIu676HrV-zh2kaPzuOUaYrkZ2MxGmczN2ZxTVl0E3m0ipbB8p0JMWSj89mWvKJtNIOZTNxnaHWGapngcZIMYY2astmEGaNav2GnI06B3h7fC_bj65f7q-_5ze2366vPN7lq6jLmqtPNwJEjou6Gpua1IoBRqFqUFdctdqJWQreqVFDVI_VDo3sSHATWpGCsLti7Q25C9GtHIcq0gaJpQktuF6SAJrFqmyS8PAp3w0xabr2Z0e_lE54kaA8ClWAHT-NfCcilB7mRTz3IpQcJpUzZyfjhmVGZ-Adsom2ml-2fDnZKmB4NeRmUodSCNp5UlNqZlyM-PotQk7FG4fRAewobt_M2lSC5DMkg75ZbWU4FBAAH-PnvgP_Z4DdyadWX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_01_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2016_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1093_ejo_cjp030
crossref_primary_10_3390_ma8115379
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2013_11_017
crossref_primary_10_1179_14653121141434
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2014_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41405_023_00143_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2014_04_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2022_104223
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_10_60185_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2014_01_008
crossref_primary_10_1590_1678_775720150550
crossref_primary_10_1080_21681163_2022_2130824
crossref_primary_10_4103_jasmr_jasmr_20_22
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_06_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2022_06_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_12_60168_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60129_8
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12109
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12465
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enbuild_2017_08_017
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12559
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_017_0419_9
crossref_primary_10_5395_JKACD_2011_36_4_306
crossref_primary_10_1002_cre2_22
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2016_12_010
crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2019_11_4_193
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_08_007
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8240_2010_00370_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2017_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_06_001
crossref_primary_10_2478_bjdm_2018_0015
crossref_primary_10_5301_ijao_5000579
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2021_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xaor_2025_02_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_06_004
crossref_primary_10_1590_S1678_77572010000600006
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12906_018_2281_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_11_60006_1
crossref_primary_10_4103_jpbs_jpbs_218_21
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12572
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_02_015
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12783
crossref_primary_10_17214_gaziaot_1123071
crossref_primary_10_3390_dj11120275
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60290_5
crossref_primary_10_34084_bshr_1495495
crossref_primary_10_3390_foods5030047
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_02_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60110_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12335
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2021_04_029
crossref_primary_10_1002_j_0022_0337_2010_74_9_tb04956_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fdj_2017_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2020_05_003
crossref_primary_10_2341_09_344_C
crossref_primary_10_1089_pho_2014_3722
crossref_primary_10_14260_jemds_2021_528
crossref_primary_10_3109_00016357_2013_777114
crossref_primary_10_4103_ccd_ccd_301_18
crossref_primary_10_3390_nano12132187
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2020_103472
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_92733_8
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12126
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00265_021_03071_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_023_02825_2
crossref_primary_10_7126_cumudj_957975
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2020_02_002
crossref_primary_10_17567_currresdentsci_1520485
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmbbm_2018_09_039
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2019_103208
crossref_primary_10_2174_1874210601913010364
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2008_06_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12594
crossref_primary_10_12677_acm_2024_1441124
crossref_primary_10_4028_www_scientific_net_KEM_587_360
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13894
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2009_00465_x
crossref_primary_10_2341_20_155_L
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2013_07_001
crossref_primary_10_26477_jbcd_v34i3_3216
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00056_023_00453_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2023_07_035
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2009_04_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2012_04_023
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_73591
crossref_primary_10_14815_kjdm_2018_45_4_233
crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2013_5_3_262
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_09_60001_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2012_10_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpor_2015_03_001
crossref_primary_10_3390_app14104025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2012_09_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2014_11_003
crossref_primary_10_2186_jpr_JPR_D_21_00025
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_09_016
crossref_primary_10_4012_dmj_2021_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2018_08_298
crossref_primary_10_3390_app13158914
crossref_primary_10_3390_dj12090284
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12149
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12759
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_012_0680_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_dj13010043
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_018_0361_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_12201
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_matdes_2010_05_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2025_01_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_09_60085_8
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12195
crossref_primary_10_1590_2177_6709_21_2_081_087_oar
crossref_primary_10_1007_s41779_024_00991_2
crossref_primary_10_2341_14_080_L
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2012_04_011
crossref_primary_10_1111_eje_12355
crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2015_7_5_400
crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2016_8_6_449
crossref_primary_10_1155_2024_2540174
crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2022_14_5_324
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12373
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12132
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2020_103502
crossref_primary_10_1177_0022034510376772
crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2014_6_2_71
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12740
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2013_02_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_09_028
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2013_02_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2014_05_024
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12625
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_009_0329_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joen_2011_04_014
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2012_00918_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2014_09_003
crossref_primary_10_17567_ataunidfd_522592
crossref_primary_10_1111_adj_12099
crossref_primary_10_18231_j_aprd_2023_020
crossref_primary_10_1002_jemt_22561
crossref_primary_10_17135_jdhs_2017_17_6_481
crossref_primary_10_2341_08_64
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2025_e42169
crossref_primary_10_1038_srep18498
crossref_primary_10_3109_00016357_2014_967720
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_13_60387_X
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_05_007
crossref_primary_10_1590_1678_7757_2017_0536
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_013_1118_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12604
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_014_1272_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pdpdt_2020_102151
crossref_primary_10_33808_clinexphealthsci_816231
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_12781
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1741_2358_2011_00458_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_02_003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_018_2744_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_020_00554_4
crossref_primary_10_2341_08_74
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_08_010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_013_0106_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_13245
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_08_005
crossref_primary_10_4041_kjod_2015_45_3_130
crossref_primary_10_1177_0022034510378012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2011_07_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_07_013
crossref_primary_10_1002_col_21896
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12649
crossref_primary_10_1002_col_21882
crossref_primary_10_4103_1735_3327_332100
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2842_2010_02120_x
crossref_primary_10_4047_jkap_2020_58_1_1
crossref_primary_10_2341_13_371_L
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2020_12_015
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_024_06124_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12953
crossref_primary_10_3109_00016357_2011_654250
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12717
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_3244
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12955
crossref_primary_10_1080_19424396_2010_12221779
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13805
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_024_00998_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2009_07_009
crossref_primary_10_1080_02726351_2021_1895385
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_024_04693_w
crossref_primary_10_14347_jtd_2021_43_3_77
crossref_primary_10_2334_josnusd_24_0344
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_11_60025_5
crossref_primary_10_13065_jksdh_2016_16_05_695
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jds_2017_07_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sdentj_2021_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_13146
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2012_11_009
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_2164
crossref_primary_10_1108_RPJ_04_2022_0136
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58030457
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_06_003
crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2019_11_5_286
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_017_2088_0
crossref_primary_10_32322_jhsm_1180255
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pdpdt_2016_04_016
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_13297
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_11_60091_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60282_6
crossref_primary_10_2341_20_222_C
crossref_primary_10_4028_www_scientific_net_KEM_544_105
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2018_02_022
crossref_primary_10_1111_iej_13708
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpor_2018_07_005
crossref_primary_10_2341_21_209_C
crossref_primary_10_3390_app13010181
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12641
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2009_03_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_12_60102_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2018_09_011
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8240_2009_00312_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_012_0069_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2013_07_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_12_012
crossref_primary_10_33715_inonusaglik_1027774
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmbbm_2021_105061
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2015_08_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2011_08_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_11_60136_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2016_05_001
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_023_03535_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jphotobiol_2016_04_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_10_60116_3
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8240_2012_00538_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12195
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_13_60323_6
crossref_primary_10_2186_ajps_12_150
crossref_primary_10_3390_ma14071768
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sdentj_2023_11_008
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12728
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jds_2020_06_023
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8240_2010_00347_x
crossref_primary_10_14347_kadt_2015_37_4_199
crossref_primary_10_1155_2018_4985030
crossref_primary_10_4103_jfmpc_jfmpc_803_19
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pdpdt_2017_10_024
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2012_00915_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12309
crossref_primary_10_1002_col_22011
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1741_2358_2012_00657_x
crossref_primary_10_1590_pboci_2024_079
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_3679
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_016_0287_9
crossref_primary_10_15171_joddd_2019_011
crossref_primary_10_15171_joddd_2019_010
crossref_primary_10_1002_cre2_524
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10031_1164
crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_12616
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10015_2422
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2009_06_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ortho_2015_06_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2017_03_009
crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0b013e3182413bfa
crossref_primary_10_2341_18_184_C
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12353
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2020_11_020
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2018_11_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2015_09_013
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10266_018_0365_2
crossref_primary_10_34172_doh_2021_08
crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2015_7_5_368
crossref_primary_10_5395_rde_2012_37_2_90
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60289_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ortho_2015_06_013
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_12099
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_023_02263_9
crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2013_5_3_319
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2012_12_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_13676
crossref_primary_10_4028_www_scientific_net_KEM_492_349
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2010_10_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_07_004
crossref_primary_10_3390_ma13214726
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_07_001
crossref_primary_10_3109_00016357_2014_913195
crossref_primary_10_2341_13_333_LR
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2015_10_015
crossref_primary_10_4047_jap_2018_10_6_422
crossref_primary_10_3390_dj12020024
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_44246_8
crossref_primary_10_14368_jdras_2021_37_4_199
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2013_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_iej_12423
crossref_primary_10_2174_1874210601812010884
crossref_primary_10_4103_JCD_JCD_401_20
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2010_08_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_07_004
crossref_primary_10_2334_josnusd_16_0636
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_71227
crossref_primary_10_3390_ceramics8010014
crossref_primary_10_4047_jkap_2011_49_4_308
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00784_020_03414_1
crossref_primary_10_1002_cre2_70091
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2008_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1177_23202068221129025
crossref_primary_10_1002_col_21821
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_3780
crossref_primary_10_4028_www_scientific_net_KEM_492_362
crossref_primary_10_1111_maec_12133
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10024_1004
crossref_primary_10_1111_joor_12194
crossref_primary_10_1002_cre2_555
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2017_04_031
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2009_03_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60083_9
crossref_primary_10_4047_jkap_2011_49_2_161
crossref_primary_10_1111_jopr_12131
crossref_primary_10_15436_2379_1705_15_14
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2011_00808_x
crossref_primary_10_14815_kjdm_2023_50_3_121
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2011_11_009
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2010_00610_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_jerd_13406
crossref_primary_10_3390_polym15020397
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2011_11_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_08_60155_9
Cites_doi 10.1016/0022-3913(82)90372-9
10.1016/0022-3913(70)90140-X
10.1016/S0022-3913(84)80001-3
10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70033-3
10.1177/154405910208100815
10.1111/j.1520-6378.1979.tb00094.x
10.1002/1520-6378(200008)25:4<278::AID-COL8>3.0.CO;2-F
10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70049-6
10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00494.x
10.1016/0022-3913(90)90099-X
10.1067/mpr.2003.60
10.1177/00220345890680120801
10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80121-2
10.1016/0022-3913(85)90077-0
10.1067/mpr.2002.125727
10.1177/00220345890680120701
10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80081-7
10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70233-1
10.1177/00220345890680051301
10.1177/00220345950740011401
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2007 The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Copyright_xml – notice: 2007 The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
– notice: The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic


MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Dentistry
EISSN 1097-6841
EndPage 208
ExternalDocumentID 17499089
10_1016_j_prosdent_2007_02_012
S002239130700100X
1_s2_0_S002239130700100X
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.FO
.~1
0R~
123
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
6PF
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAGKA
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HDX
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LH1
M27
M41
MJL
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OB-
OM.
OVD
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
TEORI
UHS
UNMZH
WUQ
X7M
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
PKN
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AHPSJ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
ZA5
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-c8d5b1a1aaad8b5414ce00f7c47231d6a874c7d6c2c034fe9b5d9e7107a4ec0f3
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 0022-3913
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 01:14:24 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:09:29 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:05:06 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:34 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:32:20 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:03 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 20:19:09 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c542t-c8d5b1a1aaad8b5414ce00f7c47231d6a874c7d6c2c034fe9b5d9e7107a4ec0f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 17499089
PQID 70501265
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_70501265
pubmed_primary_17499089
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2007_02_012
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_prosdent_2007_02_012
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_prosdent_2007_02_012
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S002239130700100X
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_prosdent_2007_02_012
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2007-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2007-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2007
  text: 2007-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
PublicationTitleAlternate J Prosthet Dent
PublicationYear 2007
Publisher Mosby, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Mosby, Inc
References Okubo, Kanawati, Richards, Childress (bib8) 1998; 80
Wee, Monaghan, Johnston (bib14) 2002; 87
Hammad (bib7) 2003; 89
Bangtson, Goodkind (bib11) 1982; 48
Johnston, Kao (bib23) 1989; 68
Milleding, Haag, Neroth, Renz (bib2) 1998; 11
Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) (bib17) 1978
Douglas, Brewer (bib22) 1998; 79
Culpepper (bib4) 1970; 24
Bergman, Nilson, Andersson (bib3) 1999; 12
Seghi, Johnston, O'Brien (bib13) 1989; 68
Paul, Peter, Pietrobon, Hammerle (bib9) 2002; 81
Kuehni, Marcus (bib18) 1979; 4
O'Brien, Hemmendinger, Boenke, Linger, Groh (bib10) 1997; 13
Goodkind, Keenan, Schwabacher (bib12) 1985; 53
ten Bosch, Coops (bib16) 1995; 74
MacEntee, Lakowski (bib15) 1981; 8
Goldstein, Lancaster (bib1) 1984; 52
Haselton, Diaz-Arnold, Hillis (bib5) 2000; 83
Ruyter, Nilner, Moller (bib20) 1987; 3
Ragain, Johnston (bib21) 2000; 25
Seghi, Hewlett, Kim (bib19) 1989; 68
van der Burgt, ten Bosch, Borsboom, Kortsmit (bib6) 1990; 63
MacEntee (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib15) 1981; 8
ten Bosch (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib16) 1995; 74
van der Burgt (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib6) 1990; 63
Ruyter (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib20) 1987; 3
Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib17) 1978
Ragain (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib21) 2000; 25
Milleding (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib2) 1998; 11
Goldstein (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib1) 1984; 52
Haselton (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib5) 2000; 83
Culpepper (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib4) 1970; 24
Goodkind (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib12) 1985; 53
Douglas (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib22) 1998; 79
Paul (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib9) 2002; 81
Okubo (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib8) 1998; 80
Wee (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib14) 2002; 87
Bergman (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib3) 1999; 12
Seghi (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib13) 1989; 68
O'Brien (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib10) 1997; 13
Kuehni (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib18) 1979; 4
Seghi (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib19) 1989; 68
Bangtson (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib11) 1982; 48
Johnston (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib23) 1989; 68
Hammad (10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib7) 2003; 89
19368605 - J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21(2):133-9
References_xml – volume: 8
  start-page: 203
  year: 1981
  end-page: 208
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Instrumental colour measurement of vital and extracted human teeth
  publication-title: J Oral Rehabil
– volume: 68
  start-page: 1755
  year: 1989
  end-page: 1759
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains
  publication-title: J Dent Res
– volume: 48
  start-page: 610
  year: 1982
  end-page: 617
  ident: bib11
  article-title: The conversion of Chromascan designations to CIE tristimulus values
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– volume: 63
  start-page: 155
  year: 1990
  end-page: 162
  ident: bib6
  article-title: A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– volume: 53
  start-page: 105
  year: 1985
  end-page: 109
  ident: bib12
  article-title: A comparison of Chromascan and spectrophotometric color measurements of 100 natural teeth
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– volume: 79
  start-page: 254
  year: 1998
  end-page: 260
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– volume: 24
  start-page: 166
  year: 1970
  end-page: 173
  ident: bib4
  article-title: A comparative study of shade-matching procedures
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– volume: 68
  start-page: 1760
  year: 1989
  end-page: 1764
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain
  publication-title: J Dent Res
– volume: 83
  start-page: 396
  year: 2000
  end-page: 401
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Clinical assessment of high-strength all-ceramic crowns
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– volume: 89
  start-page: 50
  year: 2003
  end-page: 53
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– volume: 11
  start-page: 224
  year: 1998
  end-page: 232
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Two years of clinical experience with Procera titanium crowns
  publication-title: Int J Prosthodont
– volume: 4
  start-page: 83
  year: 1979
  end-page: 91
  ident: bib18
  article-title: An experiment in visual scaling of small color differences
  publication-title: Col Res Appl
– volume: 81
  start-page: 578
  year: 2002
  end-page: 582
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth
  publication-title: J Dent Res
– volume: 25
  start-page: 278
  year: 2000
  end-page: 285
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers
  publication-title: Col Res Appl
– volume: 52
  start-page: 775
  year: 1984
  end-page: 780
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Survey of patient attitudes toward current esthetic procedures
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– volume: 3
  start-page: 246
  year: 1987
  end-page: 251
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers
  publication-title: Dent Mater
– volume: 68
  start-page: 819
  year: 1989
  end-page: 822
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry
  publication-title: J Dent Res
– volume: 12
  start-page: 135
  year: 1999
  end-page: 139
  ident: bib3
  article-title: A longitudinal clinical study of Procera ceramic-veneered titanium copings
  publication-title: Int J Prosthodont
– volume: 74
  start-page: 374
  year: 1995
  end-page: 380
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Tooth color and reflectance as related to light scattering and enamel hardness
  publication-title: J Dent Res
– volume: 80
  start-page: 642
  year: 1998
  end-page: 648
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– year: 1978
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Recommendations on uniform color spaces, color-difference equations, psychometric color terms. Supplement No. 2 of publication CIE No. 15 (E-1.3.1) ed
– volume: 13
  start-page: 179
  year: 1997
  end-page: 185
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Color distribution of three regions of extracted human teeth
  publication-title: Dent Mater
– volume: 87
  start-page: 657
  year: 2002
  end-page: 666
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
– volume: 48
  start-page: 610
  year: 1982
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib11
  article-title: The conversion of Chromascan designations to CIE tristimulus values
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(82)90372-9
– volume: 24
  start-page: 166
  year: 1970
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib4
  article-title: A comparative study of shade-matching procedures
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(70)90140-X
– volume: 52
  start-page: 775
  year: 1984
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib1
  article-title: Survey of patient attitudes toward current esthetic procedures
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(84)80001-3
– volume: 83
  start-page: 396
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib5
  article-title: Clinical assessment of high-strength all-ceramic crowns
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70033-3
– year: 1978
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib17
– volume: 81
  start-page: 578
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib9
  article-title: Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth
  publication-title: J Dent Res
  doi: 10.1177/154405910208100815
– volume: 4
  start-page: 83
  year: 1979
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib18
  article-title: An experiment in visual scaling of small color differences
  publication-title: Col Res Appl
  doi: 10.1111/j.1520-6378.1979.tb00094.x
– volume: 25
  start-page: 278
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib21
  article-title: Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers
  publication-title: Col Res Appl
  doi: 10.1002/1520-6378(200008)25:4<278::AID-COL8>3.0.CO;2-F
– volume: 80
  start-page: 642
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib8
  article-title: Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70049-6
– volume: 8
  start-page: 203
  year: 1981
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib15
  article-title: Instrumental colour measurement of vital and extracted human teeth
  publication-title: J Oral Rehabil
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00494.x
– volume: 63
  start-page: 155
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib6
  article-title: A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90099-X
– volume: 89
  start-page: 50
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib7
  article-title: Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.60
– volume: 11
  start-page: 224
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib2
  article-title: Two years of clinical experience with Procera titanium crowns
  publication-title: Int J Prosthodont
– volume: 68
  start-page: 1760
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib19
  article-title: Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain
  publication-title: J Dent Res
  doi: 10.1177/00220345890680120801
– volume: 13
  start-page: 179
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib10
  article-title: Color distribution of three regions of extracted human teeth
  publication-title: Dent Mater
  doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80121-2
– volume: 53
  start-page: 105
  year: 1985
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib12
  article-title: A comparison of Chromascan and spectrophotometric color measurements of 100 natural teeth
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90077-0
– volume: 87
  start-page: 657
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib14
  article-title: Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.125727
– volume: 12
  start-page: 135
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib3
  article-title: A longitudinal clinical study of Procera ceramic-veneered titanium copings
  publication-title: Int J Prosthodont
– volume: 68
  start-page: 1755
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib13
  article-title: Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains
  publication-title: J Dent Res
  doi: 10.1177/00220345890680120701
– volume: 3
  start-page: 246
  year: 1987
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib20
  article-title: Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers
  publication-title: Dent Mater
  doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80081-7
– volume: 79
  start-page: 254
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib22
  article-title: Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns
  publication-title: J Prosthet Dent
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70233-1
– volume: 68
  start-page: 819
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib23
  article-title: Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry
  publication-title: J Dent Res
  doi: 10.1177/00220345890680051301
– volume: 74
  start-page: 374
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012_bib16
  article-title: Tooth color and reflectance as related to light scattering and enamel hardness
  publication-title: J Dent Res
  doi: 10.1177/00220345950740011401
– reference: 19368605 - J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21(2):133-9
SSID ssj0008571
Score 2.3727496
Snippet There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much color difference is...
Statement of problem There is little agreement in the dental literature as to how much color difference constitutes an acceptable shade mismatch or how much...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 200
SubjectTerms Chi-Square Distribution
Color
Color Perception
Colorimetry - instrumentation
Colorimetry - methods
Dentistry
Dentists - psychology
Dentures
Female
Humans
Incisor
Male
Prosthesis Coloring - psychology
Regression Analysis
Title Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S002239130700100X
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S002239130700100X
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17499089
https://www.proquest.com/docview/70501265
Volume 97
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwEB7xOLSXqqWvBQo-9BrWcfxIjoiCliI4FWlvlmM7Aoqyq2Y59NLf3pmNs4AQatUeM8nIkWc889meB8BnrUMZvTCZrgqVofXTWelkyGrHa6VE1cRlevT5hZ5cyq9TNV2DoyEXhsIqk-3vbfrSWifKOM3meH59TTm-6NqqnJQWNxV8ug6b-KxRtTcPT88mFyuDXCqTr4qGI8ODROEbslMdpcSmaobigOfiOR_1HAZd-qKT1_AqgUh22P_nG1iL7Ra8-EKBP9S77S18P6UzW0q-Z2GIdyEJsFnDEPGxxew2UkeNSITQ83UM8Subp0CXZczsT-bawJwniksUZOiuXIgMFQTRrr96B5cnx9-OJllqq5B5JcUi82VQde5y51woa2oD7iPnjfHSINgL2pVGehO0F54XsolVrUIVEYkYJ6PnTfEeNtpZGz8CMzWXUtVOFiTg3JTKi-hDgSCxElzHEahhIq1PNcep9cWtHYLLbuwgAGqIaSwXFgUwgvGKb95X3fgjhxnkZIecUrSCFh3Dv3HGLi3mzua2wy_tE4UbQbXifKSzfzXq_qBMFuVFtzSujbO7zhqu8L1WI_jQ69j9DBjcnvKy2v6PcXfgZX86TbFHu7Cx-HEXPyGsWtR7sH7wK99Li-c3tJ4kcw
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB6VcigXRHluodQHruk6jh_JsSpUW2h7aqW9WY7tqC9lV2R74MJvZyZxtiBUgeA68ciR5_U5mQfAB61DGb0wma4KlaH301npZMhqx2ulRNXEvjz69EzPLuTnuZpvwOFYC0Nplcn3Dz6999aJMk2nOV1eXVGNL4a2KielxUsFnz-CxxLNl6xz__t9nkepTL5uGY7LfyoTviYv1VFBbOplKPZ5Lh6KUA8h0D4SHT2DpwlCsoPhLbdhI7bPYesjpf3Q5LYXcHNMX2yp9J6FMduFzp8tGoZ4j60Wt5HmaUQihIGvY4he2TKlufQZs9-YawNzniguUZChu3QhMlQPxLr-8iVcHH06P5xlaahC5pUUq8yXQdW5y51zoaxpCLiPnDfGS4NQL2hXGulN0F54XsgmVrUKVUQcYpyMnjfFK9hsF218A8zUXEpVO1mQeHNTKi-iDwVCxEpwHSegxoO0PnUcp8EXt3ZMLbu2owBoHKaxXFgUwASma77l0HPjjxxmlJMdK0rRB1oMC__GGbtkyp3NbYcr7W_qNoFqzfmLxv7VrnujMlmUF_2jcW1c3HXWcIXPtZrA60HH7k_A4OWUl9XOf-y7B1uz89MTe3J89uUtPBm-U1MW0jvYXH29i7sIsFb1-96AfgAihCU3
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoral+determination+of+the+tolerance+of+dentists+for+perceptibility+and+acceptability+of+shade+mismatch&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+prosthetic+dentistry&rft.au=Douglas%2C+R.+Duane%2C+DMD%2C+MS&rft.au=Steinhauer%2C+Tad+J.%2C+DMD&rft.au=Wee%2C+Alvin+G.%2C+DDS%2C+MS%2C+MPH&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=200&rft.epage=208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.prosdent.2007.02.012&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S002239130700100X&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S002239130700100X
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00223913%2FS0022391307X01872%2Fcov150h.gif