Weight Status Moderates the Relationship between Package Size and Food Intake

Single-serving packages (SSPs) may assist people in reducing consumption. Because overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary restraint may be more responsive to external food cues regarding an amount of food to consume, we examined whether weight and restraint status influence t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Vol. 114; no. 8; pp. 1251 - 1256
Main Authors Haire, Chrystal, Raynor, Hollie A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.08.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Single-serving packages (SSPs) may assist people in reducing consumption. Because overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary restraint may be more responsive to external food cues regarding an amount of food to consume, we examined whether weight and restraint status influence the relationship between package size and consumption. It was hypothesized that SSPs would reduce intake in overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary restraint compared with standard packages (STPs). Using a 2×2×2 (unrestrained/restrained×normal weight/overweight×SSP/STP) between-subjects design, 64 participants (aged 23.7±3.3 years; 81.3% white; 46.9% female), from June to October 2011, were randomly assigned to receive 20 oz pretzels packaged in SSPs or STPs, and were instructed to eat the pretzels ad libitum for 4 days. Each condition in the design contained eight participants. Total grams consumed was determined by subtracting postconsumption from preconsumption weight of packages provided. Using an analysis of variance for total grams of pretzels consumed, there was a significant interaction (P=0.01) between package size and weight status. Overweight/obese participants in the SSP condition ate fewer grams of pretzels than overweight/obese participants in the STP condition (107.0±101.9 g vs 204.4±144.9; P<0.05). No effect of restraint was found on consumption. For overweight/obese individuals, fewer pretzels were consumed when packaged in SSPs compared with STPs. Thus, replacing STPs with SSPs may assist with reducing consumption in some overweight/obese individuals.
AbstractList Single-serving packages (SSPs) may assist people in reducing consumption. Because overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary restraint may be more responsive to external food cues regarding an amount of food to consume, we examined whether weight and restraint status influence the relationship between package size and consumption. It was hypothesized that SSPs would reduce intake in overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary restraint compared with standard packages (STPs). Using a 2×2×2 (unrestrained/restrained×normal weight/overweight×SSP/STP) between-subjects design, 64 participants (aged 23.7±3.3 years; 81.3% white; 46.9% female), from June to October 2011, were randomly assigned to receive 20 oz pretzels packaged in SSPs or STPs, and were instructed to eat the pretzels ad libitum for 4 days. Each condition in the design contained eight participants. Total grams consumed was determined by subtracting postconsumption from preconsumption weight of packages provided. Using an analysis of variance for total grams of pretzels consumed, there was a significant interaction (P=0.01) between package size and weight status. Overweight/obese participants in the SSP condition ate fewer grams of pretzels than overweight/obese participants in the STP condition (107.0±101.9 g vs 204.4±144.9; P<0.05). No effect of restraint was found on consumption. For overweight/obese individuals, fewer pretzels were consumed when packaged in SSPs compared with STPs. Thus, replacing STPs with SSPs may assist with reducing consumption in some overweight/obese individuals.Single-serving packages (SSPs) may assist people in reducing consumption. Because overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary restraint may be more responsive to external food cues regarding an amount of food to consume, we examined whether weight and restraint status influence the relationship between package size and consumption. It was hypothesized that SSPs would reduce intake in overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary restraint compared with standard packages (STPs). Using a 2×2×2 (unrestrained/restrained×normal weight/overweight×SSP/STP) between-subjects design, 64 participants (aged 23.7±3.3 years; 81.3% white; 46.9% female), from June to October 2011, were randomly assigned to receive 20 oz pretzels packaged in SSPs or STPs, and were instructed to eat the pretzels ad libitum for 4 days. Each condition in the design contained eight participants. Total grams consumed was determined by subtracting postconsumption from preconsumption weight of packages provided. Using an analysis of variance for total grams of pretzels consumed, there was a significant interaction (P=0.01) between package size and weight status. Overweight/obese participants in the SSP condition ate fewer grams of pretzels than overweight/obese participants in the STP condition (107.0±101.9 g vs 204.4±144.9; P<0.05). No effect of restraint was found on consumption. For overweight/obese individuals, fewer pretzels were consumed when packaged in SSPs compared with STPs. Thus, replacing STPs with SSPs may assist with reducing consumption in some overweight/obese individuals.
Single-serving packages (SSPs) may assist people in reducing consumption. Because overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary restraint may be more responsive to external food cues regarding an amount of food to consume, we examined whether weight and restraint status influence the relationship between package size and consumption. It was hypothesized that SSPs would reduce intake in overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary restraint compared with standard packages (STPs). Using a 2×2×2 (unrestrained/restrained×normal weight/overweight×SSP/STP) between-subjects design, 64 participants (aged 23.7±3.3 years; 81.3% white; 46.9% female), from June to October 2011, were randomly assigned to receive 20 oz pretzels packaged in SSPs or STPs, and were instructed to eat the pretzels ad libitum for 4 days. Each condition in the design contained eight participants. Total grams consumed was determined by subtracting postconsumption from preconsumption weight of packages provided. Using an analysis of variance for total grams of pretzels consumed, there was a significant interaction (P=0.01) between package size and weight status. Overweight/obese participants in the SSP condition ate fewer grams of pretzels than overweight/obese participants in the STP condition (107.0±101.9 g vs 204.4±144.9; P<0.05). No effect of restraint was found on consumption. For overweight/obese individuals, fewer pretzels were consumed when packaged in SSPs compared with STPs. Thus, replacing STPs with SSPs may assist with reducing consumption in some overweight/obese individuals.
Abstract Single-serving packages (SSPs) may assist people in reducing consumption. Because overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary restraint may be more responsive to external food cues regarding an amount of food to consume, we examined whether weight and restraint status influence the relationship between package size and consumption. It was hypothesized that SSPs would reduce intake in overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary restraint compared with standard packages (STPs). Using a 2×2×2 (unrestrained/restrained×normal weight/overweight×SSP/STP) between-subjects design, 64 participants (aged 23.7±3.3 years; 81.3% white; 46.9% female), from June to October 2011, were randomly assigned to receive 20 oz pretzels packaged in SSPs or STPs, and were instructed to eat the pretzels ad libitum for 4 days. Each condition in the design contained eight participants. Total grams consumed was determined by subtracting postconsumption from preconsumption weight of packages provided. Using an analysis of variance for total grams of pretzels consumed, there was a significant interaction ( P =0.01) between package size and weight status. Overweight/obese participants in the SSP condition ate fewer grams of pretzels than overweight/obese participants in the STP condition (107.0±101.9 g vs 204.4±144.9; P <0.05). No effect of restraint was found on consumption. For overweight/obese individuals, fewer pretzels were consumed when packaged in SSPs compared with STPs. Thus, replacing STPs with SSPs may assist with reducing consumption in some overweight/obese individuals.
Author Haire, Chrystal
Raynor, Hollie A.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Chrystal
  surname: Haire
  fullname: Haire, Chrystal
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hollie A.
  surname: Raynor
  fullname: Raynor, Hollie A.
  email: hraynor@utk.edu
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28688687$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24556428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkktv1DAUhb0ooqX0D7BA3iCxmeBXEg8LJFRRqNQKxIBYWrZz03EmY09tB1R-PQ4zFRISxRtvvnPu49wn6MgHDwg9o6SihDavhmrQvqsYobyirCKMHaETxihbsKZlx-gspYGU1xDOJXmMjpmo60YweYKuv4G7WWe8yjpPCV-HDqLOkHBeA_4Mo84u-LR2O2wg_wDw-JO2G30DeOV-Ai5l8UUIHb70WW_gKXrU6zHB2eE_RV8v3n05_7C4-vj-8vzt1cLWguUFW5K67Tjnpl62xCyl0SA7wzhptWxMa4nttK21MYLIntOGGmkICCFl09Gm56fo5d53F8PtBCmrrUsWxlF7CFNSrAzLJBWU_BeltZANb1shCvr8gE5mC53aRbfV8U7db6sALw6ATlaPfdTeuvSHk01pULaFk3vOxpBShF5Zl39vMkftRkWJmnNTg5pzU3NuijJVcitS9pf03v1B0Zu9CMrOvzuIyo7Ou9LiBu4gDWGKvsShqEpFoFbzacyXQTmhcinmhl__20B1wT1U_RdDccRT
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s13679_019_00365_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_foods11162494
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12041062
crossref_primary_10_5720_kjcn_2016_21_2_131
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2023_106542
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD011045_pub2
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14010009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbusres_2016_07_019
Cites_doi 10.1038/oby.2010.306
10.1038/oby.2009.480
10.1016/j.appet.2009.02.015
10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00426.x
10.1016/j.appet.2003.10.003
10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
10.1086/591103
10.1093/ajcn/56.6.975
10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8
10.1016/j.jada.2009.08.009
10.3758/BF03193146
10.1038/oby.2007.274
10.1038/oby.2007.348
10.1038/oby.2010.233
10.1037/0021-843X.101.2.348
10.1186/1475-2891-8-31
10.1126/science.161.3843.751
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2014 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright © 2014 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2014 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
– notice: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
– notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright © 2014 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA

MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Diet & Clinical Nutrition
EndPage 1256
ExternalDocumentID 24556428
28688687
10_1016_j_jand_2013_12_022
1_s2_0_S2212267213018947
S2212267213018947
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations Tennessee
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Tennessee
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
-RU
..I
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
186
1P~
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5VS
7-5
7RV
8G5
8P~
AABNK
AABSN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAHBH
AAIKC
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAMNW
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABGRD
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIEU
ACJTP
ACPRK
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADHUB
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADQTV
ADUKH
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEQOU
AEUPX
AEUYN
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFKRA
AFPUW
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXBA
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGNAY
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHMBA
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
AXJTR
AZQEC
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CCPQU
COPKO
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EX3
FAFAN
FDB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
GBLVA
HF~
HMCUK
HZ~
K-O
KOM
M41
MO0
NAPCQ
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
P-8
P-9
P-O
PADUT
PC.
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PRG
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
Q2X
Q38
ROL
S0X
SDF
SEL
SNC
SND
SNG
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UBH
UBW
UKHRP
WH7
WOW
Z5R
~G-
AACTN
AATLK
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
SSA
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
IQODW
UCJ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-29057d333b5970b98bae8db2307a86b7c0cdac5abb408f3161b8b0e44886d16f3
ISSN 2212-2672
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 00:08:33 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 05 10:38:58 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:49 EDT 2025
Wed Apr 02 07:16:17 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:53:22 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:17 EDT 2025
Sun Feb 23 10:19:53 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:58:11 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Keywords Package size
Intake
Weight
Dietary restraint
Metabolic diseases
Food intake
Size
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
CC BY 4.0
Copyright © 2014 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c542t-29057d333b5970b98bae8db2307a86b7c0cdac5abb408f3161b8b0e44886d16f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
PMID 24556428
PQID 1548637744
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2000281410
proquest_miscellaneous_1548637744
pubmed_primary_24556428
pascalfrancis_primary_28688687
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jand_2013_12_022
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jand_2013_12_022
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S2212267213018947
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jand_2013_12_022
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace New York, NY
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York, NY
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
PublicationTitleAlternate J Acad Nutr Diet
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Elsevier
References Cools, Schotte, McNally (bib16) 1992; 101
Tarasuk, Beaton (bib17) 1999; 129
Stroebele, Ogden, Hill (bib2) 2009; 52
Wansink, Payne, Shimizu (bib3) 2011; 19
Devitt, Mattes (bib6) 2004; 42
Freedman, Brochado (bib5) 2010; 18
Bryant, King, Blundell (bib20) 2008; 9
Mikolajczyk, Ansari, Maxwell (bib19) 2009; 8
Cohen (bib13) 1992; 112
Raynor, Van Walleghen, Niemeier, Butryn, Wing (bib4) 2009; 109
Raynor, Wing (bib1) 2007; 15
Scott, Nowlis, Mandel, Morales (bib7) 2008; 35
Schachter (bib14) 1968; 161
Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, Buchner (bib12) 2007; 39
Wansink, Payne, Chandon (bib8) 2007; 15
Yanovski, Leet, Yanovski (bib18) 1992; 56
Burger, Fisher, Johnson (bib10) 2011; 19
Lohman, Roche, Martorell (bib11) 1988
AJ Stunkard, Messick (bib9) 1985; 29
(bib15) 2010
Devitt (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib6) 2004; 42
Burger (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib10) 2011; 19
AJ Stunkard (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib9) 1985; 29
Bryant (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib20) 2008; 9
Yanovski (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib18) 1992; 56
Wansink (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib3) 2011; 19
Lohman (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib11) 1988
Wansink (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib8) 2007; 15
Cools (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib16) 1992; 101
Mikolajczyk (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib19) 2009; 8
Scott (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib7) 2008; 35
Tarasuk (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib17) 1999; 129
Schachter (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib14) 1968; 161
Cohen (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib13) 1992; 112
Raynor (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib4) 2009; 109
Faul (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib12) 2007; 39
Raynor (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib1) 2007; 15
Stroebele (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib2) 2009; 52
Freedman (10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib5) 2010; 18
(10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib15) 2010
References_xml – volume: 15
  start-page: 2311
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2319
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Package unit size and amount of food: Do both influence intake?
  publication-title: Obesity
– volume: 42
  start-page: 213
  year: 2004
  end-page: 220
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Effects of food unit size and energy density on intake in humans
  publication-title: Appetite
– year: 1988
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual
– volume: 56
  start-page: 975
  year: 1992
  end-page: 980
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Food selection and intake of obese women with binge-eating disorder
  publication-title: Am J Clin Nutr
– volume: 101
  start-page: 348
  year: 1992
  end-page: 351
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Emotional arousal and overeating in restrained eaters
  publication-title: J Abnorm Psychol
– volume: 109
  start-page: 1922
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1925
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Do food provisions packaged in single-servings reduce energy intake at breakfast during a brief behavioral weight-loss intervention?
  publication-title: J Am Diet Assoc
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1098
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1100
  ident: bib3
  article-title: The 100-calorie semi-solution: Sub-packaging most reduces intake among the heaviest
  publication-title: Obesity
– volume: 161
  start-page: 751
  year: 1968
  end-page: 756
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Obesity and eating
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 19
  start-page: 546
  year: 2011
  end-page: 551
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Mechanisms behind the portion size effect: Visibility and bite size
  publication-title: Obesity
– volume: 15
  start-page: 2920
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2924
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Internal and external cues of meal cessation: The French paradox redux?
  publication-title: Obesity
– year: 2010
  ident: bib15
  publication-title: Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelies for Americans, 2010
– volume: 112
  start-page: 155
  year: 1992
  end-page: 159
  ident: bib13
  article-title: A power primer
  publication-title: Psychol Bull
– volume: 52
  start-page: 793
  year: 2009
  end-page: 796
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Do calorie-controlled portion sizes of snacks reduce energy intake?
  publication-title: Appetite
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1864
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1866
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Reducing portion size reduces food intake and plate waste
  publication-title: Obesity
– volume: 29
  start-page: 71
  year: 1985
  end-page: 83
  ident: bib9
  article-title: The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
  publication-title: J Psychosom Res
– volume: 129
  start-page: 672
  year: 1999
  end-page: 679
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Women's dietary intakes in the context of household food insecurity
  publication-title: J Nutr
– volume: 8
  start-page: 31
  year: 2009
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Food consumption frequemcy and perceived stress and depressive symptoms among students in three European countries
  publication-title: Nutr J
– volume: 35
  start-page: 391
  year: 2008
  end-page: 405
  ident: bib7
  article-title: The effects of reduced food size and package size on the consumption behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters
  publication-title: J Consum Res
– volume: 39
  start-page: 175
  year: 2007
  end-page: 191
  ident: bib12
  article-title: G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences
  publication-title: Behav Res Methods
– volume: 9
  start-page: 409
  year: 2008
  end-page: 419
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Disinhibition: Its effects on appetite and weight regulation
  publication-title: Obes Rev
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1098
  issue: 5
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib3
  article-title: The 100-calorie semi-solution: Sub-packaging most reduces intake among the heaviest
  publication-title: Obesity
  doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.306
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1864
  issue: 9
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib5
  article-title: Reducing portion size reduces food intake and plate waste
  publication-title: Obesity
  doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.480
– volume: 52
  start-page: 793
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib2
  article-title: Do calorie-controlled portion sizes of snacks reduce energy intake?
  publication-title: Appetite
  doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.02.015
– volume: 9
  start-page: 409
  issue: 5
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib20
  article-title: Disinhibition: Its effects on appetite and weight regulation
  publication-title: Obes Rev
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00426.x
– volume: 42
  start-page: 213
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib6
  article-title: Effects of food unit size and energy density on intake in humans
  publication-title: Appetite
  doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2003.10.003
– volume: 112
  start-page: 155
  issue: 1
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib13
  article-title: A power primer
  publication-title: Psychol Bull
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
– volume: 35
  start-page: 391
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib7
  article-title: The effects of reduced food size and package size on the consumption behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters
  publication-title: J Consum Res
  doi: 10.1086/591103
– year: 1988
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib11
– volume: 56
  start-page: 975
  issue: 6
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib18
  article-title: Food selection and intake of obese women with binge-eating disorder
  publication-title: Am J Clin Nutr
  doi: 10.1093/ajcn/56.6.975
– volume: 29
  start-page: 71
  issue: 1
  year: 1985
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib9
  article-title: The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
  publication-title: J Psychosom Res
  doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8
– volume: 109
  start-page: 1922
  issue: 11
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib4
  article-title: Do food provisions packaged in single-servings reduce energy intake at breakfast during a brief behavioral weight-loss intervention?
  publication-title: J Am Diet Assoc
  doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.08.009
– volume: 39
  start-page: 175
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib12
  article-title: G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences
  publication-title: Behav Res Methods
  doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
– volume: 15
  start-page: 2311
  issue: 9
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib1
  article-title: Package unit size and amount of food: Do both influence intake?
  publication-title: Obesity
  doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.274
– volume: 129
  start-page: 672
  issue: 3
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib17
  article-title: Women's dietary intakes in the context of household food insecurity
  publication-title: J Nutr
– volume: 15
  start-page: 2920
  issue: 12
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib8
  article-title: Internal and external cues of meal cessation: The French paradox redux?
  publication-title: Obesity
  doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.348
– volume: 19
  start-page: 546
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib10
  article-title: Mechanisms behind the portion size effect: Visibility and bite size
  publication-title: Obesity
  doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.233
– volume: 101
  start-page: 348
  issue: 2
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib16
  article-title: Emotional arousal and overeating in restrained eaters
  publication-title: J Abnorm Psychol
  doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.101.2.348
– volume: 8
  start-page: 31
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib19
  article-title: Food consumption frequemcy and perceived stress and depressive symptoms among students in three European countries
  publication-title: Nutr J
  doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-8-31
– year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib15
– volume: 161
  start-page: 751
  issue: 3843
  year: 1968
  ident: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.022_bib14
  article-title: Obesity and eating
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.161.3843.751
SSID ssj0000603380
Score 2.1527312
Snippet Single-serving packages (SSPs) may assist people in reducing consumption. Because overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary restraint may...
Abstract Single-serving packages (SSPs) may assist people in reducing consumption. Because overweight/obese individuals and individuals practicing dietary...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1251
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
analysis of variance
Biological and medical sciences
Body Mass Index
Body Weight
Dietary restraint
dietary restriction
Energy Intake
Feeding. Feeding behavior
Female
females
food intake
Food Packaging
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Humans
Intake
Internal Medicine
Male
Obesity
Overweight
Package size
Portion Size
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tennessee
Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
Weight
Young Adult
Title Weight Status Moderates the Relationship between Package Size and Food Intake
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S2212267213018947
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S2212267213018947
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24556428
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1548637744
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2000281410
Volume 114
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dT9swELc69jJpmva97gN50rSXKVUcO67zOBVQtwmEBmi8WXbiCkoVEEkf4GH_yf7XnT-SptCijZeoTZzE8f3iu_vl7ozQpzyLC1AFLJooLiKmhkUkWGYiqhgBlyjWhXJRvnt8fMS-H6fHvd6fTtTSvNaD_HplXsl9pAr7QK42S_Y_JNteFHbAb5AvbEHCsP0nGf9yvKYzGOeVX9bMmo7OmGyj3LrRWPsqP7NBOgen1_6zwY4tavytrNXZckjQwkx1qSeLtJO9pnq_j2E-BZu77gTMj1Xgukcnl1dgeM487x3t7o-9r-94gK32-89PdVV6wmBsq4PDrQae5tm63TxwE4S1kXFhCktAMUYJHy7Ptz5rNABLdGZPa2x1NDH85StneU84TAdTeFIbnUcdo-vzm5dLam-PfpCogoPRge2L7QoobSIyX-bzRqltIqtExvJW0wfoYQJeiJ1GB79JS-HFPAYH37J47XOGtCwfQXize-tMn8cXqoIXcuJXUlnv6jiT5_ApehJAgL964D1DPVM-R30rc_wZh4KyM9wi4gXa9YDEHpC4BSQGEOEuIHEAJA6AxBaQGB4EW0BiD8iX6Ghn-3A0jsJ6HVGesqSOkgyM_4JSqsFLjXUmtDKi0DbVQAmuh3mcFypPldYsFhMKvoYWOjYMdAgvCJ_QV2ijPC_NG4QzaibMEFrwwjDhvBhTcKJE7hY8NX1EmqGUeShmb9dUmckmanEq7fBLO_ySgFSTpI--tOdc-FIud7amjYRkk6QMalUCBu88a7jqLFOFWaOS6zDWR5tLMGi7mAgO4yOgwccGFxJUgP2up0pzPodLpkxwCn4cW98mcTy6Deruo9ceVIs7sDS1NMTbe3f-HXq0eP3fo436cm4-gLFe6033yvwFr1TfXA
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Weight+Status+Moderates+the+Relationship+between+Package+Size+and+Food+Intake&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+Academy+of+Nutrition+and+Dietetics&rft.au=Haire%2C+Chrystal%2C+MS-MPH%2C+RD%2C+LDN&rft.au=Raynor%2C+Hollie+A.%2C+PhD%2C+RD%2C+LDN&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.issn=2212-2672&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1251&rft.epage=1256&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jand.2013.12.022&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S2212267213018947&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S2212267213018947
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F22122672%2FS2212267213X0022X%2Fcov150h.gif