Condom Versus Indwelling Urinary Catheters: A Randomized Trial
OBJECTIVES: To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial. SETTING: An academically affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized men aged 40 and older wh...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) Vol. 54; no. 7; pp. 1055 - 1061 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.07.2006
Blackwell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00785.x |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | OBJECTIVES: To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial.
SETTING: An academically affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized men aged 40 and older who required a urinary collection device.
MEASUREMENTS: The incidence of adverse outcomes (bacteriuria, symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), or death) and patient device‐related satisfaction as determined according to a questionnaire. Dementia status was recorded to assess effect modification by the presence of dementia.
RESULTS: Seventy‐five subjects were randomized: 41 receiving an indwelling catheter and 34 a condom catheter. The incidence of an adverse outcome was 131/1,000 patient‐days with an indwelling catheter and 70/1,000 patient‐days with a condom catheter (P=.07). The median time to an adverse event was 7 days in the indwelling group and 11 days in the condom group. After adjusting for other risk factors, it was found that condom catheter use reduced adverse outcomes (P=.04). Patients without dementia who had an indwelling catheter were approximately five times as likely to develop bacteriuria or symptomatic UTI or to die (hazard ratio=4.84, 95% confidence interval=1.46–16.02) as those with a condom catheter (P=.01). Patients reported that condom catheters were more comfortable (P=.02) and less painful (P=.02) than indwelling catheters.
CONCLUSION: The use of condom catheters is less likely to lead to bacteriuria, symptomatic UTI, or death than the use of indwelling catheters. This protection is especially apparent in men without dementia. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction. A prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial. An academically affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Hospitalized men aged 40 and older who required a urinary collection device. The incidence of adverse outcomes (bacteriuria, symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), or death) and patient device-related satisfaction as determined according to a questionnaire. Dementia status was recorded to assess effect modification by the presence of dementia. Seventy-five subjects were randomized: 41 receiving an indwelling catheter and 34 a condom catheter. The incidence of an adverse outcome was 131/1,000 patient-days with an indwelling catheter and 70/1,000 patient-days with a condom catheter (P =.07). The median time to an adverse event was 7 days in the indwelling group and 11 days in the condom group. After adjusting for other risk factors, it was found that condom catheter use reduced adverse outcomes (P =.04). Patients without dementia who had an indwelling catheter were approximately five times as likely to develop bacteriuria or symptomatic UTI or to die (hazard ratio=4.84, 95% confidence interval=1.46-16.02) as those with a condom catheter (P =.01). Patients reported that condom catheters were more comfortable (P =.02) and less painful (P =.02) than indwelling catheters. The use of condom catheters is less likely to lead to bacteriuria, symptomatic UTI, or death than the use of indwelling catheters. This protection is especially apparent in men without dementia. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] OBJECTIVES: To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial. SETTING: An academically affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized men aged 40 and older who required a urinary collection device. MEASUREMENTS: The incidence of adverse outcomes (bacteriuria, symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), or death) and patient device‐related satisfaction as determined according to a questionnaire. Dementia status was recorded to assess effect modification by the presence of dementia. RESULTS: Seventy‐five subjects were randomized: 41 receiving an indwelling catheter and 34 a condom catheter. The incidence of an adverse outcome was 131/1,000 patient‐days with an indwelling catheter and 70/1,000 patient‐days with a condom catheter ( P =.07). The median time to an adverse event was 7 days in the indwelling group and 11 days in the condom group. After adjusting for other risk factors, it was found that condom catheter use reduced adverse outcomes ( P =.04). Patients without dementia who had an indwelling catheter were approximately five times as likely to develop bacteriuria or symptomatic UTI or to die (hazard ratio=4.84, 95% confidence interval=1.46–16.02) as those with a condom catheter ( P =.01). Patients reported that condom catheters were more comfortable ( P =.02) and less painful ( P =.02) than indwelling catheters. CONCLUSION: The use of condom catheters is less likely to lead to bacteriuria, symptomatic UTI, or death than the use of indwelling catheters. This protection is especially apparent in men without dementia. To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction.OBJECTIVESTo compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction.A prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial.DESIGNA prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial.An academically affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center.SETTINGAn academically affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center.Hospitalized men aged 40 and older who required a urinary collection device.PARTICIPANTSHospitalized men aged 40 and older who required a urinary collection device.The incidence of adverse outcomes (bacteriuria, symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), or death) and patient device-related satisfaction as determined according to a questionnaire. Dementia status was recorded to assess effect modification by the presence of dementia.MEASUREMENTSThe incidence of adverse outcomes (bacteriuria, symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), or death) and patient device-related satisfaction as determined according to a questionnaire. Dementia status was recorded to assess effect modification by the presence of dementia.Seventy-five subjects were randomized: 41 receiving an indwelling catheter and 34 a condom catheter. The incidence of an adverse outcome was 131/1,000 patient-days with an indwelling catheter and 70/1,000 patient-days with a condom catheter (P=.07). The median time to an adverse event was 7 days in the indwelling group and 11 days in the condom group. After adjusting for other risk factors, it was found that condom catheter use reduced adverse outcomes (P=.04). Patients without dementia who had an indwelling catheter were approximately five times as likely to develop bacteriuria or symptomatic UTI or to die (hazard ratio=4.84, 95% confidence interval=1.46-16.02) as those with a condom catheter (P=.01). Patients reported that condom catheters were more comfortable (P=.02) and less painful (P=.02) than indwelling catheters.RESULTSSeventy-five subjects were randomized: 41 receiving an indwelling catheter and 34 a condom catheter. The incidence of an adverse outcome was 131/1,000 patient-days with an indwelling catheter and 70/1,000 patient-days with a condom catheter (P=.07). The median time to an adverse event was 7 days in the indwelling group and 11 days in the condom group. After adjusting for other risk factors, it was found that condom catheter use reduced adverse outcomes (P=.04). Patients without dementia who had an indwelling catheter were approximately five times as likely to develop bacteriuria or symptomatic UTI or to die (hazard ratio=4.84, 95% confidence interval=1.46-16.02) as those with a condom catheter (P=.01). Patients reported that condom catheters were more comfortable (P=.02) and less painful (P=.02) than indwelling catheters.The use of condom catheters is less likely to lead to bacteriuria, symptomatic UTI, or death than the use of indwelling catheters. This protection is especially apparent in men without dementia.CONCLUSIONThe use of condom catheters is less likely to lead to bacteriuria, symptomatic UTI, or death than the use of indwelling catheters. This protection is especially apparent in men without dementia. OBJECTIVES: To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial. SETTING: An academically affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized men aged 40 and older who required a urinary collection device. MEASUREMENTS: The incidence of adverse outcomes (bacteriuria, symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), or death) and patient device‐related satisfaction as determined according to a questionnaire. Dementia status was recorded to assess effect modification by the presence of dementia. RESULTS: Seventy‐five subjects were randomized: 41 receiving an indwelling catheter and 34 a condom catheter. The incidence of an adverse outcome was 131/1,000 patient‐days with an indwelling catheter and 70/1,000 patient‐days with a condom catheter (P=.07). The median time to an adverse event was 7 days in the indwelling group and 11 days in the condom group. After adjusting for other risk factors, it was found that condom catheter use reduced adverse outcomes (P=.04). Patients without dementia who had an indwelling catheter were approximately five times as likely to develop bacteriuria or symptomatic UTI or to die (hazard ratio=4.84, 95% confidence interval=1.46–16.02) as those with a condom catheter (P=.01). Patients reported that condom catheters were more comfortable (P=.02) and less painful (P=.02) than indwelling catheters. CONCLUSION: The use of condom catheters is less likely to lead to bacteriuria, symptomatic UTI, or death than the use of indwelling catheters. This protection is especially apparent in men without dementia. To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction. A prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial. An academically affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Hospitalized men aged 40 and older who required a urinary collection device. The incidence of adverse outcomes (bacteriuria, symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), or death) and patient device-related satisfaction as determined according to a questionnaire. Dementia status was recorded to assess effect modification by the presence of dementia. Seventy-five subjects were randomized: 41 receiving an indwelling catheter and 34 a condom catheter. The incidence of an adverse outcome was 131/1,000 patient-days with an indwelling catheter and 70/1,000 patient-days with a condom catheter (P=.07). The median time to an adverse event was 7 days in the indwelling group and 11 days in the condom group. After adjusting for other risk factors, it was found that condom catheter use reduced adverse outcomes (P=.04). Patients without dementia who had an indwelling catheter were approximately five times as likely to develop bacteriuria or symptomatic UTI or to die (hazard ratio=4.84, 95% confidence interval=1.46-16.02) as those with a condom catheter (P=.01). Patients reported that condom catheters were more comfortable (P=.02) and less painful (P=.02) than indwelling catheters. The use of condom catheters is less likely to lead to bacteriuria, symptomatic UTI, or death than the use of indwelling catheters. This protection is especially apparent in men without dementia. OBJECTIVES To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction. DESIGN A prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial. SETTING An academically affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS Hospitalized men aged 40 and older who required a urinary collection device. MEASUREMENTS The incidence of adverse outcomes (bacteriuria, symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), or death) and patient device-related satisfaction as determined according to a questionnaire. Dementia status was recorded to assess effect modification by the presence of dementia. RESULTS Seventy-five subjects were randomized: 41 receiving an indwelling catheter and 34 a condom catheter. The incidence of an adverse outcome was 1311,000 patient-days with an indwelling catheter and 701,000 patient-days with a condom catheter (P=.07). The median time to an adverse event was 7 days in the indwelling group and 11 days in the condom group. After adjusting for other risk factors, it was found that condom catheter use reduced adverse outcomes (P=.04). Patients without dementia who had an indwelling catheter were approximately five times as likely to develop bacteriuria or symptomatic UTI or to die (hazard ratio=4.84, 95% confidence interval=1.46-16.02) as those with a condom catheter (P=.01). Patients reported that condom catheters were more comfortable (P=.02) and less painful (P=.02) than indwelling catheters. CONCLUSION The use of condom catheters is less likely to lead to bacteriuria, symptomatic UTI, or death than the use of indwelling catheters. This protection is especially apparent in men without dementia. Tables, Figures, 4, References. Adapted from the source document. |
| Author | Kaufman, Samuel R. Baker, Paul D. Lipsky, Benjamin A. Ossenkop, Kathleen Rogers, Mary A. M. Saint, Sanjay |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sanjay surname: Saint fullname: Saint, Sanjay organization: From theCenter for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor, Michigan†Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan‡Department of Veterans Affairs/University of Michigan Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan§Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle Division, Seattle, Washington∥Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington – sequence: 2 givenname: Samuel R. surname: Kaufman fullname: Kaufman, Samuel R. organization: From theCenter for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor, Michigan†Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan‡Department of Veterans Affairs/University of Michigan Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan§Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle Division, Seattle, Washington∥Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington – sequence: 3 givenname: Mary A. M. surname: Rogers fullname: Rogers, Mary A. M. organization: From theCenter for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor, Michigan†Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan‡Department of Veterans Affairs/University of Michigan Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan§Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle Division, Seattle, Washington∥Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington – sequence: 4 givenname: Paul D. surname: Baker fullname: Baker, Paul D. organization: From theCenter for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor, Michigan†Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan‡Department of Veterans Affairs/University of Michigan Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan§Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle Division, Seattle, Washington∥Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington – sequence: 5 givenname: Kathleen surname: Ossenkop fullname: Ossenkop, Kathleen organization: From theCenter for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor, Michigan†Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan‡Department of Veterans Affairs/University of Michigan Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan§Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle Division, Seattle, Washington∥Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington – sequence: 6 givenname: Benjamin A. surname: Lipsky fullname: Lipsky, Benjamin A. organization: From theCenter for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor, Michigan†Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan‡Department of Veterans Affairs/University of Michigan Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan§Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle Division, Seattle, Washington∥Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17965166$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16866675$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNkVFvFCEUhYmpsdvqXzATE32bEWa4wBjTpI7tWtNoom1NfCEsA8p2lqkwk2799TLu2iZ9sbwAud85cO_ZQzu-9wahjOCCpPV6WRCoyhwogaLEmBUYcwHF-hGa3RZ20AxjXOaCEbqL9mJcYkxKLMQTtEuYYIxxmKGDpvdtv8ouTIhjzE58e226zvkf2XlwXoWbrFHDTzOk8pvsMPuiJtr9Nm12FpzqnqLHVnXRPNvu--j8-Ois-ZCffp6fNIenuQZaQt5Wi0pXoBagOae6EtQYQiwtdVsTTFtqbK0sNjRdbclwrUxNLbPCYL5gta320auN71Xof40mDnLlok4_Vd70Y5SpH84Bw39B4Kl3AJLAF_fAZT8Gn5qQJcEVr0HQBD3fQuNiZVp5FdwqzUT-m18CXm4BFbXqbFBeu3jH8ZoBYSxxYsPp0McYjL1DsJwilUs5JSen5OQUqfwbqVwn6cE9qXaDGlzvh6Bc9xCDtxuDa9eZmwc_LD_Ov6ZDkucbuYuDWd_KVbiUjFcc5LdPc8m_w7uLRjTyffUHgXbGlw |
| CODEN | JAGSAF |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_7739_jkafn_2012_19_2_223 crossref_primary_10_12968_bjon_2014_23_Sup9_S20 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suc_2014_08_011 crossref_primary_10_12968_bjon_2014_23_Sup9_S25 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eursup_2016_10_001 crossref_primary_10_1017_ice_2023_65 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mcna_2007_11_004 crossref_primary_10_1086_671267 crossref_primary_10_1086_524662 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuro_2017_01_006 crossref_primary_10_1086_524663 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40520_018_0974_1 crossref_primary_10_1097_QCO_0b013e328334dda8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suc_2014_08_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajic_2014_02_028 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD013788_pub2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idc_2010_11_005 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD004201_pub3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_purol_2014_01_003 crossref_primary_10_4037_ccn2023317 crossref_primary_10_1002_msj_20070 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idc_2021_08_003 crossref_primary_10_1002_nau_20918 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1134_2072_07_71960_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11908_018_0616_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mcna_2011_02_006 crossref_primary_10_3928_00989134_20090428_05 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idc_2024_03_011 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijun_12025 crossref_primary_10_4140_TCP_n_2021_381 crossref_primary_10_1111_acem_12334 crossref_primary_10_4236_ojneph_2022_121012 crossref_primary_10_7326_M14_1304 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuro_2012_12_001 crossref_primary_10_12968_bjnn_2007_3_12_27901 crossref_primary_10_1111_nicc_12299 crossref_primary_10_5937_Galmed2409055D crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idc_2017_07_004 crossref_primary_10_12968_nrec_2014_16_4_186 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjqs_2015_004114 crossref_primary_10_12788_jhm_2724 crossref_primary_10_1017_ash_2022_30 crossref_primary_10_1038_ncpuro0569 crossref_primary_10_1097_01_NHH_0000360920_11109_7f crossref_primary_10_2147_IJGM_S289314 crossref_primary_10_1086_592416 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_72105 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mayocp_2012_02_025 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0959259811000244 crossref_primary_10_1017_ice_2024_73 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ehmc_2014_11_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idc_2013_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_WON_0000000000000220 crossref_primary_10_1086_591743 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idh_2022_05_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cger_2011_01_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ucl_2015_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjopharm_2011_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1086_591066 crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMcp1503950 crossref_primary_10_1086_650482 crossref_primary_10_2217_ahe_11_65 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idc_2011_09_009 crossref_primary_10_1177_1757177408098265 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cger_2007_03_001 crossref_primary_10_12968_nrec_2014_16_10_568 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idc_2016_07_007 crossref_primary_10_1002_msj_20276 crossref_primary_10_12968_bjnn_2014_10_2_62 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11908_008_0081_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idc_2018_07_002 crossref_primary_10_12968_bjnn_2014_10_Sup2_25 crossref_primary_10_4103_0972_5229_123451 crossref_primary_10_1097_01_NAJ_0000298069_65467_f6 crossref_primary_10_12968_bjon_2015_24_5_290 crossref_primary_10_1590_S0080_62342011000500009 crossref_primary_10_1086_518453 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_053632 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acvd_2024_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_contre_2023_100040 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_khinf_2016_04_009 crossref_primary_10_1038_sc_2015_100 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_69482 crossref_primary_10_1128_microbiolspec_UTI_0001_2012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjmed_2015_11_008 crossref_primary_10_1086_529589 crossref_primary_10_1177_175045891002000701 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajic_2019_05_031 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD013788 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2012_08_047 crossref_primary_10_1093_cid_ciq205 crossref_primary_10_36106_ijsr_8007673 crossref_primary_10_14777_kjutii_2013_8_2_73 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cger_2016_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1310_sci2503_195 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuroe_2012_12_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhin_2017_05_007 crossref_primary_10_4103_joah_joah_184_20 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjoq_2021_001534 crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_109_576413 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajic_2008_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajic_2009_12_017 crossref_primary_10_1177_17571774211060423 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pop_2008_01_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00120_017_0457_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuroe_2017_11_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idc_2022_11_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_020_03159_2 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_73911 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11908_013_0316_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ccc_2012_10_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1553_7250_16_42091_X |
| Cites_doi | 10.1056/NEJM198408303110903 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67157-1 10.1086/646977 10.1128/jcm.26.6.1115-1119.1988 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb04426.x 10.1001/jama.1979.03300040026017 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00531-3 10.1001/archinte.1987.00370020104045 10.1001/archinte.1989.00390070073009 10.1002/14651858.CD004375.pub2 10.1093/infdis/148.1.57 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49146.x 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1987.tb04922.x 10.1016/S0924-8579(00)00359-9 10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70376-7 10.1016/S0196-6553(00)90015-4 10.1016/S0891-5520(03)00011-4 10.1086/501964 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116283 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113988 10.1086/647281 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2006 INIST-CNRS 2006, The American Geriatrics Society |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2006 INIST-CNRS – notice: 2006, The American Geriatrics Society |
| DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7TK K9. NAPCQ 7QJ 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00785.x |
| DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1532-5415 |
| EndPage | 1061 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 1074271831 16866675 17965166 10_1111_j_1532_5415_2006_00785_x JGS785 ark_67375_WNG_7Z5BVC8C_D |
| Genre | technicalNote Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Feature |
| GeographicLocations | United States |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States |
| GroupedDBID | --- --Z -~X ..I .3N .55 .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1CY 1KJ 1OB 1OC 29L 31~ 33P 36B 3O- 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8F7 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AAQQT AARRQ AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYJJ AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDPE ABEML ABIVO ABJNI ABLJU ABOCM ABPPZ ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACHQT ACMXC ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFZJQ AHBTC AHMBA AI. AIACR AIAGR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BKOMP BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 DUUFO EBS EJD EMOBN ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ H~9 IHE IX1 J0M J5H K48 KBYEO L7B LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N4W N9A NF~ NHB O66 O9- OHT OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QN7 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TAE TEORI TN5 TWZ UB1 UKR UPT V9Y VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQ9 WQJ WRC WVDHM WXI WXSBR X7M XG1 XOL YCJ YF5 YFH YOC YQJ YQT YUY YZZ ZGI ZHY ZXP ZY1 ZZTAW ~IA ~S- ~WT AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AAYCA ACRPL ACYXJ ADNMO AFWVQ ALVPJ AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PKN YIN Z5M 7QP 7TK K9. NAPCQ 7QJ 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5425-d3b3c35ab5c774c384ee11f42cd9104d4ef9af0e4d91f2609ae94f6f8e07b69f3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 0002-8614 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 10:15:19 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:05:28 EDT 2025 Sun Jul 13 05:08:20 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:51:24 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:16:52 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:50:55 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:05 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:25:20 EST 2025 Wed Oct 30 09:49:53 EDT 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 7 |
| Keywords | Human Urinary system disease Cognitive disorder Bacteriuria Condom Sexual behavior Catheter Urinary tract disease Gerontology Randomization Urinary tract infection urinary catheter Clinical trial cognitive impairment Elderly Comparative study Geriatrics |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor CC BY 4.0 |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5425-d3b3c35ab5c774c384ee11f42cd9104d4ef9af0e4d91f2609ae94f6f8e07b69f3 |
| Notes | ark:/67375/WNG-7Z5BVC8C-D ArticleID:JGS785 istex:BD318CEB14EEEFDA0CA3FAE9D3E471AFBCE3C074 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66301 |
| PMID | 16866675 |
| PQID | 210379584 |
| PQPubID | 41968 |
| PageCount | 7 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_68677505 proquest_miscellaneous_57168551 proquest_journals_210379584 pubmed_primary_16866675 pascalfrancis_primary_17965166 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_5415_2006_00785_x crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1532_5415_2006_00785_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1532_5415_2006_00785_x_JGS785 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_7Z5BVC8C_D |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | July 2006 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2006-07-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2006 text: July 2006 |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationPlace | Malden, USA |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Malden, USA – name: Malden, MA – name: United States – name: New York |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Am Geriatr Soc |
| PublicationYear | 2006 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc Blackwell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Inc – name: Blackwell – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | Burke JP. Patient safety: Infection control-a problem for patient safety. N Engl J Med 2003;348:651-656. Warren JW. Catheter-associated bacteriuria in long-term care facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:557-562. Zimakoff J, Stickler DJ, Pontoppidan B et al. Bladder management and urinary tract infections in Danish hospitals, nursing homes, and home care: A national prevalence study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:215-221. Kunin CM, Douthitt S, Dancing J et al. The association between the use of urinary catheters and morbidity and mortality among elderly patients in nursing homes. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:291-301. Warren JW. Urethral catheters, condom catheters, and nosocomial urinary tract infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:212-214. Saint S, Wiese J, Amory JK et al. Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters? Am J Med 2000;109:476-480. Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:68-75. Esclarin De Ruz A, Garcia Leoni E, Herruzo Cabrera R. Epidemiology and risk factors for urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury. J Urol 2000;164:1285-1289. Gerberding JL. Hospital-onset infections: A patient safety issue. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:665-670. Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW et al. The nationwide nosocomial infection rate. A new need for vital statistics. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:159-167. Jamison J, Maguire S, McCann J. Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (2): CD004375. Tambyah PA, Knasinski V, Maki DG. The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:27-31. Lipsky BA, Ireton RC, Fihn SD et al. Diagnosis of bacteriuria in men: Specimen collection and culture interpretation. J Infect Dis 1987;155:847-854. Warren JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997;11:609-622. Haley RW, Hooton TM, Culver DH et al. Nosocomial infections in U.S. hospitals, 1975-1976: Estimated frequency by selected characteristics of patients. Am J Med 1981;70:947-959. Gammack JK. Use and management of chronic urinary catheters in long-term care: Much controversy, little consensus. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2003;4 (2 Suppl):S52-S59. Warren JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2001;17:299-303. Saint S, Lipsky BA, Baker PD et al. Urinary catheters: What type do men and their nurses prefer? J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47:1453-1457. Saint S, Chenoweth CE. Biofilms and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2003;17:411-432. Warren JW, Steinberg L, Hebel JR et al. The prevalence of urethral catheterization in Maryland nursing homes. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1535-1537. Saint S, Lipsky BA, Goold SD. Indwelling urinary catheters: A one-point restraint? Ann Intern Med 2002;137:125-127. Ouslander JG, Greengold B, Chen S. Complications of chronic indwelling urinary catheters among male nursing home patients: A prospective study. J Urol 1987;138:1191-1195. Johnson TM, Ouslander JG, Uman GC et al. Urinary incontinence treatment preferences in long-term care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:710-718. Brandeis GH, Baumann MM, Hossain M et al. The prevalence of potentially remediable urinary incontinence in frail older people: A study using the Minimum Data Set. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:179-184. Nicolle LE, Harding GK, Kennedy J et al. Urine specimen collection with external devices for diagnosis of bacteriuria in elderly incontinent men. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:1115-1119. Stark RP, Maki DG. Bacteriuria in the catheterized patient. What quantitative level of bacteriuria is relevant? N Engl J Med 1984;311:560-564. Krieger JN, Kaiser DL, Wenzel RP. Urinary tract etiology of bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients. J Infect Dis 1983;148:57-62. Ouslander JG, Greengold B, Chen S. External catheter use and urinary tract infections among incontinent male nursing home patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1987;35:1063-1070. Saint S, Lipsky BA. Preventing catheter-related bacteriuria: Can we? Should we? How? Arch Intern Med 1999;159:800-808. Hirsh DD, Fainstein V, Musher DM. Do condom catheter collecting systems cause urinary tract infection? JAMA 1979;242:340-341. Ouslander JG, Greengold BA, Silverblatt FJ et al. An accurate method to obtain urine for culture in men with external catheters. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:286-288. Johnson DE, Muncie HL, O'Reilly JL et al. An external urine collection device for incontinent women. Evaluation of long-term use. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990;38:1016-1022. 1987; 35 1979; 242 1996; 17 1981; 70 2000; 28 1990; 38 1987; 147 1997; 45 1999; 47 2002; 137 2003; 17 2001; 49 2004 1985; 121 1983; 148 1989; 149 2003; 348 1987; 155 1997; 11 1987; 138 1984; 311 2002; 23 1992; 135 1988; 26 2000; 109 2003; 4 2000; 164 1994; 15 2001; 17 1999; 159 Ouslander JG (e_1_2_6_20_2) 1987; 138 e_1_2_6_31_2 e_1_2_6_30_2 Brandeis GH (e_1_2_6_7_2) 1997; 45 Saint S (e_1_2_6_10_2) 1999; 47 Hirsh DD (e_1_2_6_26_2) 1979; 242 Burke JP. (e_1_2_6_14_2) 2003; 348 Gerberding JL. (e_1_2_6_16_2) 2002; 137 e_1_2_6_18_2 Saint S (e_1_2_6_33_2) 1999; 159 e_1_2_6_19_2 e_1_2_6_12_2 e_1_2_6_13_2 e_1_2_6_32_2 e_1_2_6_17_2 e_1_2_6_15_2 Zimakoff J (e_1_2_6_22_2) 1996; 17 Haley RW (e_1_2_6_4_2) 1981; 70 Lipsky BA (e_1_2_6_27_2) 1987; 155 Gammack JK. (e_1_2_6_8_2) 2003; 4 e_1_2_6_9_2 e_1_2_6_3_2 e_1_2_6_6_2 e_1_2_6_5_2 e_1_2_6_24_2 e_1_2_6_23_2 e_1_2_6_2_2 e_1_2_6_21_2 Nicolle LE (e_1_2_6_29_2) 1988; 26 e_1_2_6_28_2 Saint S (e_1_2_6_11_2) 2002; 137 e_1_2_6_25_2 |
| References_xml | – reference: Gammack JK. Use and management of chronic urinary catheters in long-term care: Much controversy, little consensus. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2003;4 (2 Suppl):S52-S59. – reference: Johnson TM, Ouslander JG, Uman GC et al. Urinary incontinence treatment preferences in long-term care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:710-718. – reference: Saint S, Chenoweth CE. Biofilms and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2003;17:411-432. – reference: Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW et al. The nationwide nosocomial infection rate. A new need for vital statistics. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:159-167. – reference: Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:68-75. – reference: Brandeis GH, Baumann MM, Hossain M et al. The prevalence of potentially remediable urinary incontinence in frail older people: A study using the Minimum Data Set. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:179-184. – reference: Burke JP. Patient safety: Infection control-a problem for patient safety. N Engl J Med 2003;348:651-656. – reference: Warren JW. Catheter-associated bacteriuria in long-term care facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:557-562. – reference: Krieger JN, Kaiser DL, Wenzel RP. Urinary tract etiology of bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients. J Infect Dis 1983;148:57-62. – reference: Jamison J, Maguire S, McCann J. Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (2): CD004375. – reference: Lipsky BA, Ireton RC, Fihn SD et al. Diagnosis of bacteriuria in men: Specimen collection and culture interpretation. J Infect Dis 1987;155:847-854. – reference: Saint S, Lipsky BA. Preventing catheter-related bacteriuria: Can we? Should we? How? Arch Intern Med 1999;159:800-808. – reference: Zimakoff J, Stickler DJ, Pontoppidan B et al. Bladder management and urinary tract infections in Danish hospitals, nursing homes, and home care: A national prevalence study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:215-221. – reference: Ouslander JG, Greengold BA, Silverblatt FJ et al. An accurate method to obtain urine for culture in men with external catheters. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:286-288. – reference: Hirsh DD, Fainstein V, Musher DM. Do condom catheter collecting systems cause urinary tract infection? JAMA 1979;242:340-341. – reference: Nicolle LE, Harding GK, Kennedy J et al. Urine specimen collection with external devices for diagnosis of bacteriuria in elderly incontinent men. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:1115-1119. – reference: Johnson DE, Muncie HL, O'Reilly JL et al. An external urine collection device for incontinent women. Evaluation of long-term use. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990;38:1016-1022. – reference: Stark RP, Maki DG. Bacteriuria in the catheterized patient. What quantitative level of bacteriuria is relevant? N Engl J Med 1984;311:560-564. – reference: Warren JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997;11:609-622. – reference: Gerberding JL. Hospital-onset infections: A patient safety issue. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:665-670. – reference: Haley RW, Hooton TM, Culver DH et al. Nosocomial infections in U.S. hospitals, 1975-1976: Estimated frequency by selected characteristics of patients. Am J Med 1981;70:947-959. – reference: Esclarin De Ruz A, Garcia Leoni E, Herruzo Cabrera R. Epidemiology and risk factors for urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury. J Urol 2000;164:1285-1289. – reference: Ouslander JG, Greengold B, Chen S. Complications of chronic indwelling urinary catheters among male nursing home patients: A prospective study. J Urol 1987;138:1191-1195. – reference: Saint S, Lipsky BA, Goold SD. Indwelling urinary catheters: A one-point restraint? Ann Intern Med 2002;137:125-127. – reference: Saint S, Wiese J, Amory JK et al. Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters? Am J Med 2000;109:476-480. – reference: Kunin CM, Douthitt S, Dancing J et al. The association between the use of urinary catheters and morbidity and mortality among elderly patients in nursing homes. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:291-301. – reference: Tambyah PA, Knasinski V, Maki DG. The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:27-31. – reference: Ouslander JG, Greengold B, Chen S. External catheter use and urinary tract infections among incontinent male nursing home patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1987;35:1063-1070. – reference: Saint S, Lipsky BA, Baker PD et al. Urinary catheters: What type do men and their nurses prefer? J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47:1453-1457. – reference: Warren JW, Steinberg L, Hebel JR et al. The prevalence of urethral catheterization in Maryland nursing homes. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1535-1537. – reference: Warren JW. Urethral catheters, condom catheters, and nosocomial urinary tract infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:212-214. – reference: Warren JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2001;17:299-303. – volume: 4 start-page: S52 issue: (2 Suppl) year: 2003 end-page: S59 article-title: Use and management of chronic urinary catheters in long‐term care publication-title: Much controversy, little consensus – volume: 11 start-page: 609 year: 1997 end-page: 622 article-title: Catheter‐associated urinary tract infections publication-title: Infect Dis Clin North Am – volume: 28 start-page: 68 year: 2000 end-page: 75 article-title: Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter‐related bacteriuria publication-title: Am J Infect Control – volume: 137 start-page: 125 year: 2002 end-page: 127 article-title: Indwelling urinary catheters publication-title: A one-point restraint? – volume: 138 start-page: 1191 year: 1987 end-page: 1195 article-title: Complications of chronic indwelling urinary catheters among male nursing home patients publication-title: A prospective study – issue: (2) year: 2004 article-title: Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 109 start-page: 476 year: 2000 end-page: 480 article-title: Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters? publication-title: Am J Med – volume: 348 start-page: 651 year: 2003 end-page: 656 article-title: Patient safety publication-title: Infection control—a problem for patient safety – volume: 49 start-page: 710 year: 2001 end-page: 718 article-title: Urinary incontinence treatment preferences in long‐term care publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc – volume: 121 start-page: 159 year: 1985 end-page: 167 article-title: The nationwide nosocomial infection rate. A new need for vital statistics publication-title: Am J Epidemiol – volume: 159 start-page: 800 year: 1999 end-page: 808 article-title: Preventing catheter‐related bacteriuria publication-title: Can we? Should we? How? – volume: 311 start-page: 560 year: 1984 end-page: 564 article-title: Bacteriuria in the catheterized patient. What quantitative level of bacteriuria is relevant? publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 164 start-page: 1285 year: 2000 end-page: 1289 article-title: Epidemiology and risk factors for urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury publication-title: J Urol – volume: 47 start-page: 1453 year: 1999 end-page: 1457 article-title: Urinary catheters publication-title: What type do men and their nurses prefer? – volume: 17 start-page: 411 year: 2003 end-page: 432 article-title: Biofilms and catheter‐associated urinary tract infections publication-title: Infect Dis Clin North Am – volume: 155 start-page: 847 year: 1987 end-page: 854 article-title: Diagnosis of bacteriuria in men publication-title: Specimen collection and culture interpretation – volume: 35 start-page: 1063 year: 1987 end-page: 1070 article-title: External catheter use and urinary tract infections among incontinent male nursing home patients publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc – volume: 17 start-page: 215 year: 1996 end-page: 221 article-title: Bladder management and urinary tract infections in Danish hospitals, nursing homes, and home care publication-title: A national prevalence study – volume: 137 start-page: 665 year: 2002 end-page: 670 article-title: Hospital‐onset infections publication-title: A patient safety issue – volume: 26 start-page: 1115 year: 1988 end-page: 1119 article-title: Urine specimen collection with external devices for diagnosis of bacteriuria in elderly incontinent men publication-title: J Clin Microbiol – volume: 45 start-page: 179 year: 1997 end-page: 184 article-title: The prevalence of potentially remediable urinary incontinence in frail older people publication-title: A study using the Minimum Data Set – volume: 135 start-page: 291 year: 1992 end-page: 301 article-title: The association between the use of urinary catheters and morbidity and mortality among elderly patients in nursing homes publication-title: Am J Epidemiol – volume: 23 start-page: 27 year: 2002 end-page: 31 article-title: The direct costs of nosocomial catheter‐associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care publication-title: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol – volume: 17 start-page: 212 year: 1996 end-page: 214 article-title: Urethral catheters, condom catheters, and nosocomial urinary tract infections publication-title: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol – volume: 70 start-page: 947 year: 1981 end-page: 959 article-title: Nosocomial infections in U.S. hospitals, 1975–1976 publication-title: Estimated frequency by selected characteristics of patients – volume: 38 start-page: 1016 year: 1990 end-page: 1022 article-title: An external urine collection device for incontinent women. Evaluation of long‐term use publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc – volume: 15 start-page: 557 year: 1994 end-page: 562 article-title: Catheter‐associated bacteriuria in long‐term care facilities publication-title: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol – volume: 149 start-page: 1535 year: 1989 end-page: 1537 article-title: The prevalence of urethral catheterization in Maryland nursing homes publication-title: Arch Intern Med – volume: 148 start-page: 57 year: 1983 end-page: 62 article-title: Urinary tract etiology of bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients publication-title: J Infect Dis – volume: 242 start-page: 340 year: 1979 end-page: 341 article-title: Do condom catheter collecting systems cause urinary tract infection? publication-title: JAMA – volume: 147 start-page: 286 year: 1987 end-page: 288 article-title: An accurate method to obtain urine for culture in men with external catheters publication-title: Arch Intern Med – volume: 17 start-page: 299 year: 2001 end-page: 303 article-title: Catheter‐associated urinary tract infections publication-title: Int J Antimicrob Agents – ident: e_1_2_6_28_2 doi: 10.1056/NEJM198408303110903 – ident: e_1_2_6_23_2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67157-1 – volume: 70 start-page: 947 year: 1981 ident: e_1_2_6_4_2 article-title: Nosocomial infections in U.S. hospitals, 1975–1976 publication-title: Estimated frequency by selected characteristics of patients – ident: e_1_2_6_17_2 doi: 10.1086/646977 – volume: 26 start-page: 1115 year: 1988 ident: e_1_2_6_29_2 article-title: Urine specimen collection with external devices for diagnosis of bacteriuria in elderly incontinent men publication-title: J Clin Microbiol doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.6.1115-1119.1988 – ident: e_1_2_6_31_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb04426.x – volume: 47 start-page: 1453 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_6_10_2 article-title: Urinary catheters publication-title: What type do men and their nurses prefer? – volume: 242 start-page: 340 year: 1979 ident: e_1_2_6_26_2 article-title: Do condom catheter collecting systems cause urinary tract infection? publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.1979.03300040026017 – ident: e_1_2_6_3_2 doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00531-3 – ident: e_1_2_6_30_2 doi: 10.1001/archinte.1987.00370020104045 – ident: e_1_2_6_5_2 doi: 10.1001/archinte.1989.00390070073009 – volume: 137 start-page: 665 year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_6_16_2 article-title: Hospital‐onset infections publication-title: A patient safety issue – volume: 45 start-page: 179 year: 1997 ident: e_1_2_6_7_2 article-title: The prevalence of potentially remediable urinary incontinence in frail older people publication-title: A study using the Minimum Data Set – ident: e_1_2_6_24_2 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004375.pub2 – ident: e_1_2_6_13_2 doi: 10.1093/infdis/148.1.57 – volume: 137 start-page: 125 year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_6_11_2 article-title: Indwelling urinary catheters publication-title: A one-point restraint? – ident: e_1_2_6_9_2 doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49146.x – ident: e_1_2_6_21_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1987.tb04922.x – volume: 155 start-page: 847 year: 1987 ident: e_1_2_6_27_2 article-title: Diagnosis of bacteriuria in men publication-title: Specimen collection and culture interpretation – volume: 348 start-page: 651 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_6_14_2 article-title: Patient safety publication-title: Infection control—a problem for patient safety – volume: 138 start-page: 1191 year: 1987 ident: e_1_2_6_20_2 article-title: Complications of chronic indwelling urinary catheters among male nursing home patients publication-title: A prospective study – ident: e_1_2_6_32_2 doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(00)00359-9 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_2 doi: 10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70376-7 – ident: e_1_2_6_18_2 doi: 10.1016/S0196-6553(00)90015-4 – volume: 159 start-page: 800 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_6_33_2 article-title: Preventing catheter‐related bacteriuria publication-title: Can we? Should we? How? – ident: e_1_2_6_12_2 doi: 10.1016/S0891-5520(03)00011-4 – ident: e_1_2_6_19_2 doi: 10.1086/501964 – volume: 4 start-page: S52 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_6_8_2 article-title: Use and management of chronic urinary catheters in long‐term care publication-title: Much controversy, little consensus – ident: e_1_2_6_6_2 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116283 – ident: e_1_2_6_15_2 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113988 – volume: 17 start-page: 215 year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_6_22_2 article-title: Bladder management and urinary tract infections in Danish hospitals, nursing homes, and home care publication-title: A national prevalence study – ident: e_1_2_6_25_2 doi: 10.1086/647281 |
| SSID | ssj0012088 |
| Score | 2.2300308 |
| Snippet | OBJECTIVES: To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized,... OBJECTIVES: To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized,... To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction. A prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial.... To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction. A prospective, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial.... OBJECTIVES To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction. DESIGN A prospective, randomized, unblinded,... To compare condom and indwelling urinary catheters in terms of infection risk and patient satisfaction.OBJECTIVESTo compare condom and indwelling urinary... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref wiley istex |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 1055 |
| SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Bacterial diseases Bacterial diseases of the urinary system bacteriuria Bacteriuria - epidemiology Bacteriuria - prevention & control Biological and medical sciences Catheterization Catheters Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects Clinical outcomes cognitive impairment Cross Infection - epidemiology Dementia - epidemiology Equipment Design General aspects Human bacterial diseases Humans Incidence Infection Infectious diseases Male Medical sciences Medical supplies Men Middle Aged Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Older people Patient Satisfaction Prospective Studies Risks Studies United States - epidemiology urinary catheter Urinary Catheterization Urinary Incontinence - therapy Urinary system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous urinary tract infection Urinary tract. Prostate gland Veterans |
| Title | Condom Versus Indwelling Urinary Catheters: A Randomized Trial |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-7Z5BVC8C-D/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1532-5415.2006.00785.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16866675 https://www.proquest.com/docview/210379584 https://www.proquest.com/docview/57168551 https://www.proquest.com/docview/68677505 |
| Volume | 54 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwEB2hVkJcaPkOheID4pbVeuNxshyQykJbKrWH0oWKi2UntoS2TavNrlT11zOTZFOCilQhbrEcJ8pkxn5jz7wBeEvmr9CiiguUIabZD2PnCscnhUoSAnaYcu7w4ZHen6qDUzxt4584F6bhh-g23Ngy6vmaDdy6qm_kmDCPv8TVmUKa4YDxJIduMT467pik5GiYZR0SpiWpH9Rz64N6K9U6C_2KIydtRcILTdWL22BpH-XWy9TuBsxWH9hEp8wGy4Ub5Nd_cD_-HwlswsMWzYqdRv0ewT1fPob7h-15_RP4MOFqIeeCd-WWlfhSFrxXSKulmM7rRGBRZyAyw-d7sSOOLd_989oX4oQN4ylMdz-fTPbjtmJDnCMZf1wkLskTtA5zgpV5kinvpQxqlBcES1ShfBjbMPSKmoE8KWYGV0GHzA9Tp8cheQZr5UXpX4DQBfntdhQcTRlqaJVTXjtqoUytJVQaQbr6OyZv6cy5qsaZ-c2tIfEYFg8X2-TwPRKPuYpAdiMvG0qPO4x5VytAN8DOZxwSl6L5frRn0h_48dskm5hPEWz3NOTmDelYo9Q6gq2Vyph2uqjMiLM1x4QFI3jT9ZKd8-GNLf3FsjJIjm1G8Pbvd2imJiRAG8HzRhNv3k1dmjzDCLDWpzt_tjnY-0oXL_9x3BY8aHasOLr5Fawt5kv_mjDcwm3X1vkLxgA0CQ |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3dT9RAEJ8YSNQX_JaKwD4Y33q5Xne2PR9M8BAO5O4B75T4stltdxMDFnMfCeGvd6btFWswIca3Nu226XRm9zezM78BeEPmL9GgDHOMfEizH4bW5pZ3CmVECNhiwrXDo7EaTuXxGZ7V7YC4Fqbih2gCbmwZ5XzNBs4B6baVY8xE_hGuNhWSFDsEKNe5wXfpX502XFJRr5umDRamRamd1nPrk1pr1TqL_YpzJ82cxOervhe3AdM2zi0XqoNHcLH6xCo_5byzXNhOdv0H--N_ksFj2KgBrdirNPAJ3HPFU7g_qrfsn8H7ATcM-SE4MLeci6Mi53AhLZhiOitrgUVZhMgkn-_Enjg1fPf3a5eLCdvGc5gefJwMhmHdtCHMkOw_zGMbZzEaixkhyyxOpXNR5GUvywmZyFw63ze-6ySdenKmmBxceuVT102s6vv4BawVl4XbBKFyct1Nz1uaNWTXSCudsnSGUWIMAdMAktXv0VnNaM6NNS70b54NiUezeLjfJmfwkXj0VQBRM_JnxepxhzFvSw1oBpjZOWfFJai_jg918g0_fBmkA70fwE5LRW7ekPRJL5UKYGulM7qeMea6xwWbfYKDAew2V8nUef_GFO5yOddIvm1KCPfvdyhmJyRMG8DLShVv3k2XFDmHAWCpUHf-bH18-JkOXv3juF14MJyMTvTJ0fjTFjysAlic7Pwa1hazpdsmSLewO6Wp_gIJiDgk |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEB5KAqGXNukrTtrEh9KbF2styd4cAuluNo82S0mzbehFSJYEZVsn7ANCfn1nbK9TlxRC6c1Clo3HM9I30sw3AG_R_LnQgkdWMB_h7CciY6yhk0LOEAEbkVLu8NlIHo_56aW4rOOfKBem4odoNtzIMsr5mgz82vq2kYuEePyZWJ4ppJnoIJ5c5TLOSMMH5w2VFOvGWdZAYVyT2lE99z6ptVStktRvKHRSz1B6vip7cR8ubcPccp0aPoXJ8gur8JRJZzE3nfz2D_LH_yOCdXhSw9nwoNK_DXjkimewdlYf2D-H_T6VC_kZ0rbcYhaeFJY2C3G5DMfTMhM4LFMQieJzLzwIzzXd_f3W2fCCLOMFjIeHF_3jqC7ZEOUCrT-yiUnyRGgjcsSVeZJx5xjzvJtbxCXccud72seOY9OjK0XU4NxLn7k4NbLnk5ewUlwVbhNCadFx111vcM7gseaGO2mwJViqNcLSANLl31F5zWdOZTV-qN_8GhSPIvFQtU2K30PxqJsAWDPyuuL0eMCYd6UCNAP0dEIxcalQX0dHKv0m3n_pZ301CGCnpSF3b0h7UjApA9heqoyq54uZ6lK6Zg_BYAC7TS8aOp3e6MJdLWZKoGebIb79-x2SuAkR0QbwqtLEu3djl0TXMABR6tODP1udHn3Gi61_HLcLa58GQ_XxZPRhGx5Xu1cU6fwaVubThXuDeG5udkpD_QU7eTbc |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Condom+versus+indwelling+urinary+catheters%3A+a+randomized+trial&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+Geriatrics+Society+%28JAGS%29&rft.au=Saint%2C+Sanjay&rft.au=Kaufman%2C+Samuel+R&rft.au=Rogers%2C+Mary+A+M&rft.au=Baker%2C+Paul+D&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1532-5415.2006.00785.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0002-8614&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0002-8614&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0002-8614&client=summon |