A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta-analysis

The Copas parametric model is aimed at exploring the potential impact of publication bias via sensitivity analysis, by making assumptions regarding the probability of publication of individual studies related to the standard error of their effect sizes. Reviewers often have prior assumptions about t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistics in medicine Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 51 - 66
Main Authors Mavridis, Dimitris, Sutton, Alex, Cipriani, Andrea, Salanti, Georgia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 15.01.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The Copas parametric model is aimed at exploring the potential impact of publication bias via sensitivity analysis, by making assumptions regarding the probability of publication of individual studies related to the standard error of their effect sizes. Reviewers often have prior assumptions about the extent of selection in the set of studies included in a meta‐analysis. However, a Bayesian implementation of the Copas model has not been studied yet. We aim to present a Bayesian selection model for publication bias and to extend it to the case of network meta‐analysis where each treatment is compared either with placebo or with a reference treatment creating a star‐shaped network. We take advantage of the greater flexibility offered in the Bayesian context to incorporate in the model prior information on the extent and strength of selection. To derive prior distributions, we use both external data and an elicitation process of expert opinion. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
AbstractList The Copas parametric model is aimed at exploring the potential impact of publication bias via sensitivity analysis, by making assumptions regarding the probability of publication of individual studies related to the standard error of their effect sizes. Reviewers often have prior assumptions about the extent of selection in the set of studies included in a meta-analysis. However, a Bayesian implementation of the Copas model has not been studied yet. We aim to present a Bayesian selection model for publication bias and to extend it to the case of network meta-analysis where each treatment is compared either with placebo or with a reference treatment creating a star-shaped network. We take advantage of the greater flexibility offered in the Bayesian context to incorporate in the model prior information on the extent and strength of selection. To derive prior distributions, we use both external data and an elicitation process of expert opinion.
The Copas parametric model is aimed at exploring the potential impact of publication bias via sensitivity analysis, by making assumptions regarding the probability of publication of individual studies related to the standard error of their effect sizes. Reviewers often have prior assumptions about the extent of selection in the set of studies included in a meta‐analysis. However, a Bayesian implementation of the Copas model has not been studied yet. We aim to present a Bayesian selection model for publication bias and to extend it to the case of network meta‐analysis where each treatment is compared either with placebo or with a reference treatment creating a star‐shaped network. We take advantage of the greater flexibility offered in the Bayesian context to incorporate in the model prior information on the extent and strength of selection. To derive prior distributions, we use both external data and an elicitation process of expert opinion. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The Copas parametric model is aimed at exploring the potential impact of publication bias via sensitivity analysis, by making assumptions regarding the probability of publication of individual studies related to the standard error of their effect sizes. Reviewers often have prior assumptions about the extent of selection in the set of studies included in a meta-analysis. However, a Bayesian implementation of the Copas model has not been studied yet. We aim to present a Bayesian selection model for publication bias and to extend it to the case of network meta-analysis where each treatment is compared either to placebo or to a reference treatment creating a star-shaped network. We take advantage of the greater flexibility offered in the Bayesian context to incorporate in the model prior information on the extent and strength of selection. To derive prior distributions, we use both external data and an elicitation process of expert opinion.
The Copas parametric model is aimed at exploring the potential impact of publication bias via sensitivity analysis, by making assumptions regarding the probability of publication of individual studies related to the standard error of their effect sizes. Reviewers often have prior assumptions about the extent of selection in the set of studies included in a meta-analysis. However, a Bayesian implementation of the Copas model has not been studied yet. We aim to present a Bayesian selection model for publication bias and to extend it to the case of network meta-analysis where each treatment is compared either with placebo or with a reference treatment creating a star-shaped network. We take advantage of the greater flexibility offered in the Bayesian context to incorporate in the model prior information on the extent and strength of selection. To derive prior distributions, we use both external data and an elicitation process of expert opinion.The Copas parametric model is aimed at exploring the potential impact of publication bias via sensitivity analysis, by making assumptions regarding the probability of publication of individual studies related to the standard error of their effect sizes. Reviewers often have prior assumptions about the extent of selection in the set of studies included in a meta-analysis. However, a Bayesian implementation of the Copas model has not been studied yet. We aim to present a Bayesian selection model for publication bias and to extend it to the case of network meta-analysis where each treatment is compared either with placebo or with a reference treatment creating a star-shaped network. We take advantage of the greater flexibility offered in the Bayesian context to incorporate in the model prior information on the extent and strength of selection. To derive prior distributions, we use both external data and an elicitation process of expert opinion.
The Copas parametric model is aimed at exploring the potential impact of publication bias via sensitivity analysis, by making assumptions regarding the probability of publication of individual studies related to the standard error of their effect sizes. Reviewers often have prior assumptions about the extent of selection in the set of studies included in a meta-analysis. However, a Bayesian implementation of the Copas model has not been studied yet. We aim to present a Bayesian selection model for publication bias and to extend it to the case of network meta-analysis where each treatment is compared either with placebo or with a reference treatment creating a star-shaped network. We take advantage of the greater flexibility offered in the Bayesian context to incorporate in the model prior information on the extent and strength of selection. To derive prior distributions, we use both external data and an elicitation process of expert opinion. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Author Cipriani, Andrea
Salanti, Georgia
Mavridis, Dimitris
Sutton, Alex
AuthorAffiliation 4 Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona
1 Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
5 Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford
3 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester
2 Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 3 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester
– name: 5 Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford
– name: 2 Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina
– name: 1 Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
– name: 4 Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dimitris
  surname: Mavridis
  fullname: Mavridis, Dimitris
  email: Dimitris Mavridis, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina, School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece., dimi.mavridis@googlemail.com
  organization: Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Alex
  surname: Sutton
  fullname: Sutton, Alex
  organization: Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, U.K
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Andrea
  surname: Cipriani
  fullname: Cipriani, Andrea
  organization: Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Georgia
  surname: Salanti
  fullname: Salanti, Georgia
  organization: Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22806991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kc1u1DAURi1URKcFiSdAltiwyeCf2E42SGVoh4oCC0B0ZznODXXrxCFO2ubtcTvtQBGsLNnHn8693x7a6UIHCD2nZEkJYa-ja5ciL_NHaEFJqTLCRLGDFoQplUlFxS7ai_GcEEoFU0_QLmMFkWVJF6g_wM3k_YzfmhmiMx02fe-dNaMLHQ4NHs8Ar0JvIo7gwd5et6EGj5sw4H6qtnDlEgTXI3Q11HgMuIPxKgwXuIXRZKYzfo4uPkWPG-MjPLs799G3o8Ovq_fZyef18ergJLMiZ3nW8KpO9lKVnCsupLSUsionksuyMrLJG16YUlhmZVNUTNREQAFArFJEUlPyffRmk5sUW6gtdONgvO4H15ph1sE4_fClc2f6R7jUIk8rLEUKeHUXMISfE8RRty5a8N50EKaoKeMFJSo5JvTlX-h5mIY0cKIky0tGBeWJevGn0VblvowELDeAHUKMAzTauvF2t0nQeU2Jvmlbp7b1Tdu_Fbcf7jP_gWYb9Mp5mP_L6S_HHx_yLo5wveXNcKGl4kro75_W-t3Rh1OxPl3pNf8FG2rIkw
CODEN SMEDDA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinepi_2016_11_015
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjment_2023_300951
crossref_primary_10_1002_jrsm_1195
crossref_primary_10_1080_03610926_2015_1109664
crossref_primary_10_1002_jrsm_1197
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinepi_2015_05_027
crossref_primary_10_1093_biostatistics_kxx004
crossref_primary_10_1093_biomtc_ujae080
crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_6475
crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_15288
crossref_primary_10_1111_biom_13441
crossref_primary_10_1093_ije_dyt074
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10463_021_00793_4
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_023_02213_5
crossref_primary_10_1002_jrsm_1506
crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000001039
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2288_14_112
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0076654
crossref_primary_10_4178_epih_e2014019
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00394_018_1849_0
crossref_primary_10_1155_2024_8683715
crossref_primary_10_1002_jrsm_1085
crossref_primary_10_1111_biom_13822
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD014744
crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_7815
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijcard_2015_01_023
crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_6321
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinepi_2016_11_002
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_021_01292_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinepi_2016_04_015
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2022_070135
crossref_primary_10_1002_jrsm_1734
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_021_02166_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spl_2022_109733
crossref_primary_10_1002_jrsm_1452
crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_9643
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2025_02_092
crossref_primary_10_1177_0962280218791602
crossref_primary_10_1097_MJT_0000000000001548
crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_825383
crossref_primary_10_1155_2017_9016924
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00184_021_00809_2
crossref_primary_10_1136_eb_2013_101700
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10869_022_09840_0
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pmed_1003082
crossref_primary_10_1002_jrsm_1143
crossref_primary_10_1002_jrsm_1266
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_053012
crossref_primary_10_1002_cl2_1080
Cites_doi 10.1136/bmj.b2981
10.1002/sim.4143
10.1023/A:1008929526011
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.009
10.1214/ss/1177011364
10.2307/1912352
10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
10.1002/bimj.201000240
10.1093/biostatistics/kxp032
10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00629.x
10.1214/06-BA117A
10.1177/096228020000900503
10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00161-4
10.1186/1471-2288-9-2
10.1214/06-BA122
10.1080/03610929008830197
10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.05.008
10.1111/1467-985X.00123
10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.247
10.1177/096228020101000402
10.1002/bimj.201000151
10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
10.2307/2347972
10.1002/sim.3813
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.002
10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16043-1
10.1214/ss/1030037958
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00513.x
10.1056/NEJMsa065779
10.1002/sim.2112
10.1007/BF00143942
10.1002/sim.2293
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Jan 15, 2013
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
– notice: Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Jan 15, 2013
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1002/sim.5494
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE


MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Statistics
Public Health
EISSN 1097-0258
EndPage 66
ExternalDocumentID PMC5410995
3495054741
22806991
10_1002_sim_5494
SIM5494
ark_67375_WNG_DFKX5GXC_G
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Feature
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: European Research Council
  grantid: 260559
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
33P
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5RE
5VS
66C
6PF
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABIJN
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABPVW
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACPOU
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
CS3
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HBH
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HZ~
IX1
J0M
JPC
KQQ
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OIG
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
ROL
RWI
RX1
RYL
SUPJJ
SV3
TN5
UB1
V2E
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WIB
WIH
WIK
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WWH
WXSBR
WYISQ
XBAML
XG1
XV2
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAHQN
AAMNL
AANHP
AAYCA
ACRPL
ACYXJ
ADNMO
AFWVQ
ALVPJ
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGQPQ
AGYGG
AMVHM
CITATION
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
5PM
FEDTE
HF~
HVGLF
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5424-f3bd2776793373566c112b406369ba6f4f38a95c2c6f8b25d05e8ee0c77061a93
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0277-6715
1097-0258
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:29:05 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 05:26:10 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 04:15:16 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:50:36 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:57 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:28:03 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 17:10:32 EST 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:58:01 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5424-f3bd2776793373566c112b406369ba6f4f38a95c2c6f8b25d05e8ee0c77061a93
Notes ArticleID:SIM5494
istex:292A3D4309225F2B0237509883F1157641E71845
ark:/67375/WNG-DFKX5GXC-G
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5494
PMID 22806991
PQID 1624921513
PQPubID 48361
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5410995
proquest_miscellaneous_1238107776
proquest_journals_1624921513
pubmed_primary_22806991
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_sim_5494
crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_5494
wiley_primary_10_1002_sim_5494_SIM5494
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_DFKX5GXC_G
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 15 January 2013
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-01-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2013
  text: 15 January 2013
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Chichester, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Chichester, UK
– name: England
– name: New York
PublicationTitle Statistics in medicine
PublicationTitleAlternate Statist. Med
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References Cartinhour J.One-dimensional marginal density functions of a truncated multivariate normal density function. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 1990; 19:197-203.
Robert CR.Simulation of truncated normal variables. Statistics in Computing 1995; 5:121-125.
Egger M, Smith GD, Scheider M, Minder C.Bias in meta analysis detected by a simple graphical test. British Medical Journal 1997; 315:629-634.
Moreno SG, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Cooper NJ, Abrams KR.Adjusting for publication biases across similar interventions performed well when compared with gold standard data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011; 64:1230-1241.
Baker R, Jackson D.Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies. Biometrics 2006; 62:785-792.
Haim S.Simple approximations for the inverse cumulative function, the density function and the loss integral of the normal distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 1982; 31:108-114.
Celeux G, Forbes F, Robert CR, Titterington DM.Deviance information criteria for missing data models. Bayesian Analysis 2006; 1:651-674.
Carpenter JR, Schwarzer G, Rucker G, Kunstler R.Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009; 62:624-631.
Hedges LV.Modeling publication selection effects in meta-analysis. Statistical Science 1992; 7:246-255.
Lambert PC, Sutton AJ, Burton PR, Abrams KR, Jones DR.How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using Winbugs. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24:2401-2428.
Bowden J, Jackson D, Thompson SG.Modelling multiple sources of dissemination bias in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2010; 29:945-955.
Moreno SG, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Stanley TD, Abrams KR, Peters JL, Cooper N.Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2009; 9:2.
Heckman JJ.Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 2011; 47:153-161.
Copas JB, Shi JQ.A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2001; 10:251-265.
Lu G, Ades AE.Modeling between-trial variance structure in mixed treatment comparisons. Biostatistics 2009; 10:792-805.
Rufibach K.Selection models with monotone weight functions in meta-analysis. Biometrical Journal 2011; 53:689-704.
Givens GH, Smith DD, Tweedie RL.Publication bias in meta-analysis: a Bayesian data-augmentation approach to account for issues exemplified in the passive smoking debate. Statistical Science 1997; 12:221-250.
Copas J, Shi JQ.Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis. Biostatistics 2000; 1:247-262.
Rucker G, Carpenter J, Schwarzer G.Detecting and adjusting for small-study in meta-analysis. Biometrical Journal 2011; 2:351-368.
Duval S, Tweedie R.Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometircs 2000; 56:455-463.
Chootrakool H, Shi JQ, Yue R.Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis for multi-arm trials with selection bias. Statistics in Medicine 2011; 30:1183-1198.
Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D.WinBUGS - a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing 2011; 10:325-337.
Duval S, Tweedie R.A nonparametric " trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2000; 95:89-98.
Sutton AJ, Song F, Gilbody SM, Abrams KR.Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2000; 9:421-445.
Whittington CJ, Kendall T, Fonagy P, Cottrel D, Cotgrove A, Boddington E.Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data. Lancet 2004; 363:1341-1345.
Schwarzer G, Carpenter J, Rucker G.Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010; 63:282-288.
Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R.Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. The New England Journal of Medicine 2008; 358:252-260.
Jackson D.The implications of publication bias for meta-analysi' other parameters. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25:2911-2921.
Thornton A, Lee P.Publication bias in meta analysis: its causes and consequences. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2000; 53:207-216.
Moreno SG, Sutton AJ, Turner EH, Abrams KR, Cooper NJ, Palmer TM, Ades AE.Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications. British Medical Journal 2009; 339:b2981.
Copas JB.What works? Selectivity models and meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Seies A 1999; 162:95-109.
Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L, Moreno SG.Assessing publication bias in meta analyses in the presence of between-study heterogeneity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Seies A 2010; 173:575-591.
Gelman R.Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Analysis 2006; 1:515-533.
2004; 363
1997; 315
2009; 62
2011; 2
2011
1990; 19
2000; 9
1982; 31
2011; 53
2000; 95
2011; 30
1999; 162
2011; 10
2000; 1
1992
2006; 1
2009; 339
2010; 63
1995; 5
2005; 24
1992; 7
2009; 10
2006; 62
2000; 56
2010; 29
2006; 25
2000; 53
1997; 12
2011; 64
2009; 9
2008; 358
2010; 173
2011; 47
2001; 10
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_26_1
e_1_2_7_27_1
e_1_2_7_28_1
e_1_2_7_29_1
Heckman JJ (e_1_2_7_14_1) 2011; 47
Lunn DJ (e_1_2_7_21_1) 2011; 10
e_1_2_7_30_1
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_31_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
e_1_2_7_32_1
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_33_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_34_1
e_1_2_7_35_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
e_1_2_7_36_1
References_xml – reference: Egger M, Smith GD, Scheider M, Minder C.Bias in meta analysis detected by a simple graphical test. British Medical Journal 1997; 315:629-634.
– reference: Moreno SG, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Cooper NJ, Abrams KR.Adjusting for publication biases across similar interventions performed well when compared with gold standard data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011; 64:1230-1241.
– reference: Whittington CJ, Kendall T, Fonagy P, Cottrel D, Cotgrove A, Boddington E.Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data. Lancet 2004; 363:1341-1345.
– reference: Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L, Moreno SG.Assessing publication bias in meta analyses in the presence of between-study heterogeneity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Seies A 2010; 173:575-591.
– reference: Copas JB.What works? Selectivity models and meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Seies A 1999; 162:95-109.
– reference: Jackson D.The implications of publication bias for meta-analysi' other parameters. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25:2911-2921.
– reference: Copas J, Shi JQ.Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis. Biostatistics 2000; 1:247-262.
– reference: Sutton AJ, Song F, Gilbody SM, Abrams KR.Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2000; 9:421-445.
– reference: Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R.Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. The New England Journal of Medicine 2008; 358:252-260.
– reference: Baker R, Jackson D.Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies. Biometrics 2006; 62:785-792.
– reference: Duval S, Tweedie R.Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometircs 2000; 56:455-463.
– reference: Carpenter JR, Schwarzer G, Rucker G, Kunstler R.Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009; 62:624-631.
– reference: Gelman R.Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Analysis 2006; 1:515-533.
– reference: Lambert PC, Sutton AJ, Burton PR, Abrams KR, Jones DR.How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using Winbugs. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24:2401-2428.
– reference: Heckman JJ.Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 2011; 47:153-161.
– reference: Hedges LV.Modeling publication selection effects in meta-analysis. Statistical Science 1992; 7:246-255.
– reference: Robert CR.Simulation of truncated normal variables. Statistics in Computing 1995; 5:121-125.
– reference: Duval S, Tweedie R.A nonparametric " trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2000; 95:89-98.
– reference: Rufibach K.Selection models with monotone weight functions in meta-analysis. Biometrical Journal 2011; 53:689-704.
– reference: Givens GH, Smith DD, Tweedie RL.Publication bias in meta-analysis: a Bayesian data-augmentation approach to account for issues exemplified in the passive smoking debate. Statistical Science 1997; 12:221-250.
– reference: Chootrakool H, Shi JQ, Yue R.Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis for multi-arm trials with selection bias. Statistics in Medicine 2011; 30:1183-1198.
– reference: Copas JB, Shi JQ.A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2001; 10:251-265.
– reference: Bowden J, Jackson D, Thompson SG.Modelling multiple sources of dissemination bias in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2010; 29:945-955.
– reference: Lu G, Ades AE.Modeling between-trial variance structure in mixed treatment comparisons. Biostatistics 2009; 10:792-805.
– reference: Cartinhour J.One-dimensional marginal density functions of a truncated multivariate normal density function. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 1990; 19:197-203.
– reference: Thornton A, Lee P.Publication bias in meta analysis: its causes and consequences. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2000; 53:207-216.
– reference: Moreno SG, Sutton AJ, Turner EH, Abrams KR, Cooper NJ, Palmer TM, Ades AE.Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications. British Medical Journal 2009; 339:b2981.
– reference: Celeux G, Forbes F, Robert CR, Titterington DM.Deviance information criteria for missing data models. Bayesian Analysis 2006; 1:651-674.
– reference: Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D.WinBUGS - a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing 2011; 10:325-337.
– reference: Schwarzer G, Carpenter J, Rucker G.Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010; 63:282-288.
– reference: Haim S.Simple approximations for the inverse cumulative function, the density function and the loss integral of the normal distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 1982; 31:108-114.
– reference: Moreno SG, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Stanley TD, Abrams KR, Peters JL, Cooper N.Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2009; 9:2.
– reference: Rucker G, Carpenter J, Schwarzer G.Detecting and adjusting for small-study in meta-analysis. Biometrical Journal 2011; 2:351-368.
– year: 2011
– volume: 2
  start-page: 351
  year: 2011
  end-page: 368
  article-title: Detecting and adjusting for small‐study in meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Biometrical Journal
– volume: 31
  start-page: 108
  year: 1982
  end-page: 114
  article-title: Simple approximations for the inverse cumulative function, the density function and the loss integral of the normal distribution
  publication-title: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C
– volume: 9
  start-page: 421
  year: 2000
  end-page: 445
  article-title: Modelling publication bias in meta‐analysis: a review
  publication-title: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
– volume: 95
  start-page: 89
  year: 2000
  end-page: 98
  article-title: A nonparametric " trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Journal of the American Statistical Association
– volume: 62
  start-page: 624
  year: 2009
  end-page: 631
  article-title: Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta‐analyses
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
– volume: 47
  start-page: 153
  year: 2011
  end-page: 161
  article-title: Sample selection bias as a specification error
  publication-title: Econometrica
– volume: 62
  start-page: 785
  year: 2006
  end-page: 792
  article-title: Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies
  publication-title: Biometrics
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1183
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1198
  article-title: Meta‐analysis and sensitivity analysis for multi‐arm trials with selection bias
  publication-title: Statistics in Medicine
– volume: 10
  start-page: 325
  year: 2011
  end-page: 337
  article-title: WinBUGS – a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility
  publication-title: Statistics and Computing
– volume: 1
  start-page: 515
  year: 2006
  end-page: 533
  article-title: Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models
  publication-title: Bayesian Analysis
– volume: 56
  start-page: 455
  year: 2000
  end-page: 463
  article-title: Trim and fill: a simple funnel‐plot‐based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Biometircs
– volume: 53
  start-page: 689
  year: 2011
  end-page: 704
  article-title: Selection models with monotone weight functions in meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Biometrical Journal
– volume: 363
  start-page: 1341
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1345
  article-title: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 10
  start-page: 251
  year: 2001
  end-page: 265
  article-title: A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews
  publication-title: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
– volume: 339
  start-page: b2981
  year: 2009
  article-title: Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications
  publication-title: British Medical Journal
– volume: 24
  start-page: 2401
  year: 2005
  end-page: 2428
  article-title: How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using Winbugs
  publication-title: Statistics in Medicine
– volume: 9
  start-page: 2
  year: 2009
  article-title: Assessment of regression‐based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study
  publication-title: BMC Medical Research Methodology
– volume: 10
  start-page: 792
  year: 2009
  end-page: 805
  article-title: Modeling between‐trial variance structure in mixed treatment comparisons
  publication-title: Biostatistics
– volume: 1
  start-page: 247
  year: 2000
  end-page: 262
  article-title: Meta‐analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis
  publication-title: Biostatistics
– volume: 162
  start-page: 95
  year: 1999
  end-page: 109
  article-title: What works? Selectivity models and meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Seies A
– volume: 315
  start-page: 629
  year: 1997
  end-page: 634
  article-title: Bias in meta analysis detected by a simple graphical test
  publication-title: British Medical Journal
– year: 1992
– volume: 64
  start-page: 1230
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1241
  article-title: Adjusting for publication biases across similar interventions performed well when compared with gold standard data
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
– volume: 12
  start-page: 221
  year: 1997
  end-page: 250
  article-title: Publication bias in meta‐analysis: a Bayesian data‐augmentation approach to account for issues exemplified in the passive smoking debate
  publication-title: Statistical Science
– volume: 1
  start-page: 651
  year: 2006
  end-page: 674
  article-title: Deviance information criteria for missing data models
  publication-title: Bayesian Analysis
– volume: 19
  start-page: 197
  year: 1990
  end-page: 203
  article-title: One‐dimensional marginal density functions of a truncated multivariate normal density function
  publication-title: Communications in Statistics ‐ Theory and Methods
– volume: 5
  start-page: 121
  year: 1995
  end-page: 125
  article-title: Simulation of truncated normal variables
  publication-title: Statistics in Computing
– volume: 63
  start-page: 282
  year: 2010
  end-page: 288
  article-title: Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim‐and‐fill method for selection bias in meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
– volume: 7
  start-page: 246
  year: 1992
  end-page: 255
  article-title: Modeling publication selection effects in meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Statistical Science
– volume: 53
  start-page: 207
  year: 2000
  end-page: 216
  article-title: Publication bias in meta analysis: its causes and consequences
  publication-title: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
– volume: 173
  start-page: 575
  year: 2010
  end-page: 591
  article-title: Assessing publication bias in meta analyses in the presence of between‐study heterogeneity
  publication-title: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Seies A
– volume: 358
  start-page: 252
  year: 2008
  end-page: 260
  article-title: Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy
  publication-title: The New England Journal of Medicine
– volume: 29
  start-page: 945
  year: 2010
  end-page: 955
  article-title: Modelling multiple sources of dissemination bias in meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Statistics in Medicine
– volume: 25
  start-page: 2911
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2921
  article-title: The implications of publication bias for meta‐analysi’ other parameters
  publication-title: Statistics in Medicine
– ident: e_1_2_7_31_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2981
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.1002/sim.4143
– volume: 10
  start-page: 325
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  article-title: WinBUGS – a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility
  publication-title: Statistics and Computing
  doi: 10.1023/A:1008929526011
– ident: e_1_2_7_32_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.009
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011364
– volume: 47
  start-page: 153
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  article-title: Sample selection bias as a specification error
  publication-title: Econometrica
  doi: 10.2307/1912352
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1002/bimj.201000240
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp032
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00629.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
  doi: 10.1214/06-BA117A
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1177/096228020000900503
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00161-4
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-2
– ident: e_1_2_7_33_1
  doi: 10.1214/06-BA122
– ident: e_1_2_7_36_1
  doi: 10.1080/03610929008830197
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.05.008
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1111/1467-985X.00123
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.247
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1177/096228020101000402
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1002/bimj.201000151
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
  doi: 10.2307/2347972
– ident: e_1_2_7_35_1
  doi: 10.1002/sim.3813
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.002
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16043-1
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1214/ss/1030037958
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_34_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00513.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa065779
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
  doi: 10.1002/sim.2112
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00143942
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  doi: 10.1002/sim.2293
SSID ssj0011527
Score 2.3194766
Snippet The Copas parametric model is aimed at exploring the potential impact of publication bias via sensitivity analysis, by making assumptions regarding the...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 51
SubjectTerms antidepressants
Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use
Bayes Theorem
Bayesian analysis
Bias
Depression - drug therapy
Humans
informative priors
Medical treatment
Meta-analysis
Meta-Analysis as Topic
mixed treatment comparison
Models, Statistical
multiple treatments
prior elicitation
Probability distribution
Publication Bias
small study effects
Title A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta-analysis
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-DFKX5GXC-G/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fsim.5494
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22806991
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1624921513
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1238107776
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5410995
Volume 32
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZQkVAlxGOBEijISAhO2ebhR3wsC7sFtD0AFStxsOzEEavSbLWblSgnfgK_kV_CTJykXSgS4hQpmcjxZGx_nhl_Q8jTQqaZZVKFsTQqZLZUoVJJHLrYsigXRZY6PO88PRQHR-zNjM_arEo8C-P5IXqHG46MZr7GAW7sau-cNHQ1PxnC5gapQDFVC_HQu545Ku6qtWKEUsiYd7yzUbLXvbixEl1FpX69DGb-mS15EcU2y9D4JvnUdcBnnxwP17Ud5t9-43b8vx7eIjdadEr3vTndJldcNSDXpm38fUCuey8f9YeXBmQbsaqner5DlvsUnfln9IU5c3g2k16IjtNFSQFr0hFs0ld01VTfwdtNJR4KyJmenjsQqZ2DUOefp_WCVj5bnZ642vz8_sO0VCp3ydH41YfRQdiWdAhzzhIWlqktEiQQUmkqU4CSOeA9sAqRCmWNKFmZZkbxPMlFmdmEFxF3mXNRLiUAD6PSe2SrWlTuPqEuiUrBCuUELxkYFWzF4hKmEysSJaxlAXne_V6dt3znWHbji_ZMzYkG_WrUb0Ce9JKnnuPjEplnjYX0AmZ5jDlxkuuPhxP9cvx2xiezkZ4EZLczId1OBysdCyRmBHCVQlv9YxjIGJ0xlVusQQbBUyRBOQHZ8RbXN4acRQKQfEDkhi32AkgSvvmkmn9uyMI5w9gnh-9vTO2vHdTvX0_x-uBfBR-S7aQpDRKHMd8lW_Vy7R4BQKvt42Yo_gI_6jlh
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFD4amwSTEJdyWWGAkRA8pcvFdmLxNAptx9Y-wCb6gGTFqSOqbenUphLjiZ_Ab-SXcE5uW2FIiKdI8UkcO8f2d86xvwPwYhIGkeGhcrwwVg43qXKU8j3Heoa7iZxEgaXzzsORHBzx92MxXoPX9VmYkh-icbjRyCjmaxrg5JDeuWANXUxPO2jd8GuwQQm9C3vqQ8Md5dX5WilGKUNP1Myzrr9TP7myFm1Qt369Cmj-uV_yMo4tFqLebfhcN6Hcf3LcWeamk3z7jd3xP9t4B25VAJXtlhp1F9Zs1oLrwyoE34KbpaOPleeXWrBJcLVke74H811Grz5nb-JzS8cz2aUAOZulDOEm66KdvmCLIgEP3S6S8TAEz-zswofIzBSFahc9y2csKzess1Obxz-__4grNpX7cNR7d9gdOFVWBycR3OdOGpiJTxxCKgjCANFkgpAPFUMGUplYpjwNoliJxE9kGhlfTFxhI2vdJAwRe8QqeADr2SyzW8Cs76aST5SVIuWoV2iNeSnOKEb6ShrD2_Cq_r86qSjPKfPGiS7Jmn2N_aupf9vwvJE8K2k-rpB5WahIIxDPj2lbXCj0p1Ffv-3tj0V_3NX9NmzXOqSrGWGhPUncjIivAqyrKcaxTAGaOLOzJcoQfnJD7Jw2PCxVrqmMaIskgvk2hCvK2AgQT_hqSTb9UvCFC07hT4HfX-jaXxuoP-4N6froXwWfwY3B4fBAH-yN9h_Dpl9kCvEcT2zDej5f2ieI13LztBiXvwCkgj18
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3bbtNAEB1BK1WVEJdwaaDAIiF4curL7tr7WBKSlpIIARWReFh57bUalTpRLhLliU_gG_kSZnxrA0VCPFmyx7J3fXZ9dmb2DMDzNAwiw0PleGGsHG4y5Sjle471DHcTmUaBpf3Ow5E8OOZvxmJcZVXSXphSH6JxuNHIKOZrGuCzNNu7EA1dTM46uLjh12GTSzciRPfeN9JRXl2ulUKUMvRELTzr-nv1nWu_ok3q1a9X8cw_0yUv09jiP9S_BZ_rFpTpJ6ed1dJ0km-_iTv-XxNvw82KnrL9Ek934JrNW7A1rALwLbhRuvlYuXupBdtEVkut57sw32fkzT9nr-JzS5sz2aXwOJtmDMkm6-IqfcEWRfkdOl2U4mFIndnswoPIzASNagc9W05ZXqarszO7jH9-_xFXWir34Lj_-mP3wKlqOjiJ4D53ssCkPikIqSAIA-SSCRI-hIUMpDKxzHgWRLESiZ_ILDK-SF1hI2vdJAyRecQquA8b-TS3O8Cs72aSp8pKkXFEFa7FvAznEyN9JY3hbXhZf16dVILnVHfjiy6lmn2N_aupf9vwrLGclSIfV9i8KBDSGMTzU0qKC4X-NBroXv9oLAbjrh60YbeGkK7mg4X2JCkzIrsK8FnNZRzJFJ6JcztdoQ2xJzfEzmnDgxJxzcNItEgilW9DuIbFxoBUwtev5JOTQi1ccAp-Cnz_Amp_baD-cDik48N_NXwKW-96ff32cHT0CLb9okyI53hiFzaW85V9jGRtaZ4Uo_IX6Es8NA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+fully+Bayesian+application+of+the+Copas+selection+model+for+publication+bias+extended+to+network+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Statistics+in+medicine&rft.au=Mavridis%2C+Dimitris&rft.au=Sutton%2C+Alex&rft.au=Cipriani%2C+Andrea&rft.au=Salanti%2C+Georgia&rft.date=2013-01-15&rft.eissn=1097-0258&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fsim.5494&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22806991&rft.externalDocID=22806991
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0277-6715&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0277-6715&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0277-6715&client=summon