Screening and identification of evaluation indicators of low phosphorus tolerant germplasm in Gleditsia sinensis Lam
This study aims to explore the low phosphorus (P) tolerance of saplings from different Gleditsia sinensis Lam. families. It also seeks to screen for Gleditsia sinensis families with strong low P tolerance and identify key indicators for evaluating their tolerance. This research provides a foundation...
Saved in:
| Published in | Scientific reports Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 31716 - 16 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
30.12.2024
Nature Publishing Group Nature Portfolio |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | This study aims to explore the low phosphorus (P) tolerance of saplings from different
Gleditsia sinensis
Lam. families. It also seeks to screen for
Gleditsia sinensis
families with strong low P tolerance and identify key indicators for evaluating their tolerance. This research provides a foundation for the breeding of superior families of
Gleditsia sinensis
and the study of mechanisms underlying low P tolerance. Using saplings from 30
Gleditsia sinensis
families as the research subjects, a sand culture pot experiment was conducted. This study set up low P treatment (0.01 mmol L
−1
) and normal P treatment (1 mmol L
−1
). Twenty-five indicators including growth morphology, biomass, root morphology, and P content were measured. The low P tolerance coefficient was used as the basic data for assessing the low P tolerance of
Gleditsia sinensis
. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was employed to comprehensively assess the low P tolerance types of
Gleditsia sinensis
a stepwise regression model was established to identify the key evaluation indicators for low P tolerance. The results indicate that low P stress reduced plant height, stem diameter, and biomass in most
Gleditsia sinensis
families, but increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs. Principal component analysis transformed the 25 indicators into 6 independent comprehensive indicators, with a cumulative contribution rate of 86.743%. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method calculated a comprehensive evaluation value (D value), enabling the screening of
Gleditsia sinensis
families into low P tolerant and low P sensitive types. Cluster analysis grouped the 30
Gleditsia sinensis
families into 4 types. Among them, F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 were classified as low P tolerant types; F6, F23, F3, F17, F20, F2, F12, F11, F16, F8, F5, F27, F1, and F26 were categorized as intermediate types; F30, F7, F22, F4, F19, F29, F24, F14 and F25 were considered low P sensitive types, and F21 was classified as extremely low P sensitive types. The stepwise regression analysis identified the indicators stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area, and leaf P content as the key factors for discriminating the low P tolerance of
Gleditsia sinensis
. The regression model is as follows: D=-0.005 + 0.323 stem diameter *+0.154 * total root volume + 0.196* shoot dry weight + 0.139* total root projection area − 0.112* leaf P content. In summary, low P stress inhibited the growth of
Gleditsia sinensis
saplings, but it increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs to cope with low P environments. The screening identified F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 as low P tolerant
Gleditsia sinensis
families. The evaluation indicators for low P tolerance in
Gleditsia sinensis
were identified as stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area and leaf P content. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | This study aims to explore the low phosphorus (P) tolerance of saplings from different
Gleditsia sinensis
Lam. families. It also seeks to screen for
Gleditsia sinensis
families with strong low P tolerance and identify key indicators for evaluating their tolerance. This research provides a foundation for the breeding of superior families of
Gleditsia sinensis
and the study of mechanisms underlying low P tolerance. Using saplings from 30
Gleditsia sinensis
families as the research subjects, a sand culture pot experiment was conducted. This study set up low P treatment (0.01 mmol L
−1
) and normal P treatment (1 mmol L
−1
). Twenty-five indicators including growth morphology, biomass, root morphology, and P content were measured. The low P tolerance coefficient was used as the basic data for assessing the low P tolerance of
Gleditsia sinensis
. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was employed to comprehensively assess the low P tolerance types of
Gleditsia sinensis
a stepwise regression model was established to identify the key evaluation indicators for low P tolerance. The results indicate that low P stress reduced plant height, stem diameter, and biomass in most
Gleditsia sinensis
families, but increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs. Principal component analysis transformed the 25 indicators into 6 independent comprehensive indicators, with a cumulative contribution rate of 86.743%. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method calculated a comprehensive evaluation value (D value), enabling the screening of
Gleditsia sinensis
families into low P tolerant and low P sensitive types. Cluster analysis grouped the 30
Gleditsia sinensis
families into 4 types. Among them, F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 were classified as low P tolerant types; F6, F23, F3, F17, F20, F2, F12, F11, F16, F8, F5, F27, F1, and F26 were categorized as intermediate types; F30, F7, F22, F4, F19, F29, F24, F14 and F25 were considered low P sensitive types, and F21 was classified as extremely low P sensitive types. The stepwise regression analysis identified the indicators stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area, and leaf P content as the key factors for discriminating the low P tolerance of
Gleditsia sinensis
. The regression model is as follows: D=-0.005 + 0.323 stem diameter *+0.154 * total root volume + 0.196* shoot dry weight + 0.139* total root projection area − 0.112* leaf P content. In summary, low P stress inhibited the growth of
Gleditsia sinensis
saplings, but it increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs to cope with low P environments. The screening identified F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 as low P tolerant
Gleditsia sinensis
families. The evaluation indicators for low P tolerance in
Gleditsia sinensis
were identified as stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area and leaf P content. Abstract This study aims to explore the low phosphorus (P) tolerance of saplings from different Gleditsia sinensis Lam. families. It also seeks to screen for Gleditsia sinensis families with strong low P tolerance and identify key indicators for evaluating their tolerance. This research provides a foundation for the breeding of superior families of Gleditsia sinensis and the study of mechanisms underlying low P tolerance. Using saplings from 30 Gleditsia sinensis families as the research subjects, a sand culture pot experiment was conducted. This study set up low P treatment (0.01 mmol L−1) and normal P treatment (1 mmol L−1). Twenty-five indicators including growth morphology, biomass, root morphology, and P content were measured. The low P tolerance coefficient was used as the basic data for assessing the low P tolerance of Gleditsia sinensis. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was employed to comprehensively assess the low P tolerance types of Gleditsia sinensis a stepwise regression model was established to identify the key evaluation indicators for low P tolerance. The results indicate that low P stress reduced plant height, stem diameter, and biomass in most Gleditsia sinensis families, but increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs. Principal component analysis transformed the 25 indicators into 6 independent comprehensive indicators, with a cumulative contribution rate of 86.743%. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method calculated a comprehensive evaluation value (D value), enabling the screening of Gleditsia sinensis families into low P tolerant and low P sensitive types. Cluster analysis grouped the 30 Gleditsia sinensis families into 4 types. Among them, F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 were classified as low P tolerant types; F6, F23, F3, F17, F20, F2, F12, F11, F16, F8, F5, F27, F1, and F26 were categorized as intermediate types; F30, F7, F22, F4, F19, F29, F24, F14 and F25 were considered low P sensitive types, and F21 was classified as extremely low P sensitive types. The stepwise regression analysis identified the indicators stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area, and leaf P content as the key factors for discriminating the low P tolerance of Gleditsia sinensis. The regression model is as follows: D=-0.005 + 0.323 stem diameter *+0.154 * total root volume + 0.196* shoot dry weight + 0.139* total root projection area − 0.112* leaf P content. In summary, low P stress inhibited the growth of Gleditsia sinensis saplings, but it increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs to cope with low P environments. The screening identified F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 as low P tolerant Gleditsia sinensis families. The evaluation indicators for low P tolerance in Gleditsia sinensis were identified as stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area and leaf P content. This study aims to explore the low phosphorus (P) tolerance of saplings from different Gleditsia sinensis Lam. families. It also seeks to screen for Gleditsia sinensis families with strong low P tolerance and identify key indicators for evaluating their tolerance. This research provides a foundation for the breeding of superior families of Gleditsia sinensis and the study of mechanisms underlying low P tolerance. Using saplings from 30 Gleditsia sinensis families as the research subjects, a sand culture pot experiment was conducted. This study set up low P treatment (0.01 mmol L−1) and normal P treatment (1 mmol L−1). Twenty-five indicators including growth morphology, biomass, root morphology, and P content were measured. The low P tolerance coefficient was used as the basic data for assessing the low P tolerance of Gleditsia sinensis. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was employed to comprehensively assess the low P tolerance types of Gleditsia sinensis a stepwise regression model was established to identify the key evaluation indicators for low P tolerance. The results indicate that low P stress reduced plant height, stem diameter, and biomass in most Gleditsia sinensis families, but increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs. Principal component analysis transformed the 25 indicators into 6 independent comprehensive indicators, with a cumulative contribution rate of 86.743%. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method calculated a comprehensive evaluation value (D value), enabling the screening of Gleditsia sinensis families into low P tolerant and low P sensitive types. Cluster analysis grouped the 30 Gleditsia sinensis families into 4 types. Among them, F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 were classified as low P tolerant types; F6, F23, F3, F17, F20, F2, F12, F11, F16, F8, F5, F27, F1, and F26 were categorized as intermediate types; F30, F7, F22, F4, F19, F29, F24, F14 and F25 were considered low P sensitive types, and F21 was classified as extremely low P sensitive types. The stepwise regression analysis identified the indicators stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area, and leaf P content as the key factors for discriminating the low P tolerance of Gleditsia sinensis. The regression model is as follows: D=-0.005 + 0.323 stem diameter *+0.154 * total root volume + 0.196* shoot dry weight + 0.139* total root projection area − 0.112* leaf P content. In summary, low P stress inhibited the growth of Gleditsia sinensis saplings, but it increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs to cope with low P environments. The screening identified F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 as low P tolerant Gleditsia sinensis families. The evaluation indicators for low P tolerance in Gleditsia sinensis were identified as stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area and leaf P content. This study aims to explore the low phosphorus (P) tolerance of saplings from different Gleditsia sinensis Lam. families. It also seeks to screen for Gleditsia sinensis families with strong low P tolerance and identify key indicators for evaluating their tolerance. This research provides a foundation for the breeding of superior families of Gleditsia sinensis and the study of mechanisms underlying low P tolerance. Using saplings from 30 Gleditsia sinensis families as the research subjects, a sand culture pot experiment was conducted. This study set up low P treatment (0.01 mmol L ) and normal P treatment (1 mmol L ). Twenty-five indicators including growth morphology, biomass, root morphology, and P content were measured. The low P tolerance coefficient was used as the basic data for assessing the low P tolerance of Gleditsia sinensis. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was employed to comprehensively assess the low P tolerance types of Gleditsia sinensis a stepwise regression model was established to identify the key evaluation indicators for low P tolerance. The results indicate that low P stress reduced plant height, stem diameter, and biomass in most Gleditsia sinensis families, but increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs. Principal component analysis transformed the 25 indicators into 6 independent comprehensive indicators, with a cumulative contribution rate of 86.743%. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method calculated a comprehensive evaluation value (D value), enabling the screening of Gleditsia sinensis families into low P tolerant and low P sensitive types. Cluster analysis grouped the 30 Gleditsia sinensis families into 4 types. Among them, F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 were classified as low P tolerant types; F6, F23, F3, F17, F20, F2, F12, F11, F16, F8, F5, F27, F1, and F26 were categorized as intermediate types; F30, F7, F22, F4, F19, F29, F24, F14 and F25 were considered low P sensitive types, and F21 was classified as extremely low P sensitive types. The stepwise regression analysis identified the indicators stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area, and leaf P content as the key factors for discriminating the low P tolerance of Gleditsia sinensis. The regression model is as follows: D=-0.005 + 0.323 stem diameter *+0.154 * total root volume + 0.196* shoot dry weight + 0.139* total root projection area - 0.112* leaf P content. In summary, low P stress inhibited the growth of Gleditsia sinensis saplings, but it increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs to cope with low P environments. The screening identified F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 as low P tolerant Gleditsia sinensis families. The evaluation indicators for low P tolerance in Gleditsia sinensis were identified as stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area and leaf P content. This study aims to explore the low phosphorus (P) tolerance of saplings from different Gleditsia sinensis Lam. families. It also seeks to screen for Gleditsia sinensis families with strong low P tolerance and identify key indicators for evaluating their tolerance. This research provides a foundation for the breeding of superior families of Gleditsia sinensis and the study of mechanisms underlying low P tolerance. Using saplings from 30 Gleditsia sinensis families as the research subjects, a sand culture pot experiment was conducted. This study set up low P treatment (0.01 mmol L-1) and normal P treatment (1 mmol L-1). Twenty-five indicators including growth morphology, biomass, root morphology, and P content were measured. The low P tolerance coefficient was used as the basic data for assessing the low P tolerance of Gleditsia sinensis. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was employed to comprehensively assess the low P tolerance types of Gleditsia sinensis a stepwise regression model was established to identify the key evaluation indicators for low P tolerance. The results indicate that low P stress reduced plant height, stem diameter, and biomass in most Gleditsia sinensis families, but increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs. Principal component analysis transformed the 25 indicators into 6 independent comprehensive indicators, with a cumulative contribution rate of 86.743%. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method calculated a comprehensive evaluation value (D value), enabling the screening of Gleditsia sinensis families into low P tolerant and low P sensitive types. Cluster analysis grouped the 30 Gleditsia sinensis families into 4 types. Among them, F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 were classified as low P tolerant types; F6, F23, F3, F17, F20, F2, F12, F11, F16, F8, F5, F27, F1, and F26 were categorized as intermediate types; F30, F7, F22, F4, F19, F29, F24, F14 and F25 were considered low P sensitive types, and F21 was classified as extremely low P sensitive types. The stepwise regression analysis identified the indicators stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area, and leaf P content as the key factors for discriminating the low P tolerance of Gleditsia sinensis. The regression model is as follows: D=-0.005 + 0.323 stem diameter *+0.154 * total root volume + 0.196* shoot dry weight + 0.139* total root projection area - 0.112* leaf P content. In summary, low P stress inhibited the growth of Gleditsia sinensis saplings, but it increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs to cope with low P environments. The screening identified F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 as low P tolerant Gleditsia sinensis families. The evaluation indicators for low P tolerance in Gleditsia sinensis were identified as stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area and leaf P content.This study aims to explore the low phosphorus (P) tolerance of saplings from different Gleditsia sinensis Lam. families. It also seeks to screen for Gleditsia sinensis families with strong low P tolerance and identify key indicators for evaluating their tolerance. This research provides a foundation for the breeding of superior families of Gleditsia sinensis and the study of mechanisms underlying low P tolerance. Using saplings from 30 Gleditsia sinensis families as the research subjects, a sand culture pot experiment was conducted. This study set up low P treatment (0.01 mmol L-1) and normal P treatment (1 mmol L-1). Twenty-five indicators including growth morphology, biomass, root morphology, and P content were measured. The low P tolerance coefficient was used as the basic data for assessing the low P tolerance of Gleditsia sinensis. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was employed to comprehensively assess the low P tolerance types of Gleditsia sinensis a stepwise regression model was established to identify the key evaluation indicators for low P tolerance. The results indicate that low P stress reduced plant height, stem diameter, and biomass in most Gleditsia sinensis families, but increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs. Principal component analysis transformed the 25 indicators into 6 independent comprehensive indicators, with a cumulative contribution rate of 86.743%. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method calculated a comprehensive evaluation value (D value), enabling the screening of Gleditsia sinensis families into low P tolerant and low P sensitive types. Cluster analysis grouped the 30 Gleditsia sinensis families into 4 types. Among them, F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 were classified as low P tolerant types; F6, F23, F3, F17, F20, F2, F12, F11, F16, F8, F5, F27, F1, and F26 were categorized as intermediate types; F30, F7, F22, F4, F19, F29, F24, F14 and F25 were considered low P sensitive types, and F21 was classified as extremely low P sensitive types. The stepwise regression analysis identified the indicators stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area, and leaf P content as the key factors for discriminating the low P tolerance of Gleditsia sinensis. The regression model is as follows: D=-0.005 + 0.323 stem diameter *+0.154 * total root volume + 0.196* shoot dry weight + 0.139* total root projection area - 0.112* leaf P content. In summary, low P stress inhibited the growth of Gleditsia sinensis saplings, but it increased the root morphological indicators, root-shoot ratio and PUE of various organs to cope with low P environments. The screening identified F13, F10, F9, F18, F15, and F28 as low P tolerant Gleditsia sinensis families. The evaluation indicators for low P tolerance in Gleditsia sinensis were identified as stem diameter, total root volume, shoot dry weight, total root projection area and leaf P content. |
| ArticleNumber | 31716 |
| Author | Zou, Rong Lu, Chunyun Wang, Xiurong Xiao, Feng Zhao, Yang |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Chunyun surname: Lu fullname: Lu, Chunyun organization: Institute for Forest Resources and Environment of Guizhou, College of Forestry, Guizhou University – sequence: 2 givenname: Xiurong surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Xiurong organization: Institute for Forest Resources and Environment of Guizhou, College of Forestry, Guizhou University – sequence: 3 givenname: Yang surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Yang email: zhy737@126.com organization: Institute for Forest Resources and Environment of Guizhou, College of Forestry, Guizhou University – sequence: 4 givenname: Rong surname: Zou fullname: Zou, Rong organization: Institute for Forest Resources and Environment of Guizhou, College of Forestry, Guizhou University – sequence: 5 givenname: Feng surname: Xiao fullname: Xiao, Feng organization: Institute for Forest Resources and Environment of Guizhou, College of Forestry, Guizhou University |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39738241$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kktv1DAUhSNURB_0D7BAkdiwCfiZ2CuEKmgrjcQCWFuOfTP1yLEHO-mo_x7PpIW2i1qK7OSe8_nGPqfVUYgBquodRp8wouJzZphL0SDCGkFQh5vdq-qEIMYbQgk5erQ-rs5z3qAyOJEMyzfVMZUdFYThk2r6aRJAcGFd62BrZyFMbnBGTy6GOg413Go_L28u2H0hprwv-LirtzcxlyfNuZ6ih6TDVK8hjVuv81j09aUH66bsdJ1dgJBdrld6fFu9HrTPcH4_n1W_v3_7dXHVrH5cXl98XTWGMzw1A1jGDcE9J6KzdBBGy04Sji30hElmcScsoi0nemglMVwOAnhLAHjfMeD0rLpeuDbqjdomN-p0p6J26vAhprXSaXLGg7JW98UMgoqeIWr6oYD7sqMp8AGLwvqysLZzP4I15ZyS9k-gTyvB3ah1vFUYt4J3HSqEj_eEFP_MkCc1umzAex0gzllRzBFlbctlkX54Jt3EOYVyVgcVlq3s9r_3_nFL_3p5uN0iEIvApJhzgkEZNx3usnTovMJI7bOkliypkiV1yJLaFSt5Zn2gv2iiiykXcShB-N_2C66_AwjfLA |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2025_107747 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115127 10.1007/s11104-013-1696-y 10.3389/fpls.2016.00408 10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00035-9 10.1093/jxb/ern303 10.1111/jipb.12163 10.1007/s40626-021-00227-9 10.3390/d14050385 10.1155/2020/2148032 10.3390/f14020243 10.1007/s00468-018-1683-2 10.1104/pp.111.175281 10.1007/s11104-024-06769-6 10.1007/s10681-022-03145-2 10.2307/2656994 10.1093/treephys/tpad138 10.3390/agronomy11102010 10.1081/CSS-100103001 10.1007/s11104-023-05976-x 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.04.030 10.1007/s11540-016-9330-z 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.08.040 10.1007/s00468-020-01961-4 10.2134/jeq2010.0216 10.1080/01904167.2011.544351 10.1073/pnas.202474599 10.3390/horticulturae8070636 10.1007/s11676-018-0597-6 10.3389/fpls.2022.983788 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132235 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.001 10.1080/01904160902943171 10.3390/f13020203 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x 10.1186/s12870-023-04171-5 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.10.007 10.1007/s00468-021-02161-4 10.1007/s13562-020-00586-5 10.3390/agriculture11070668 10.1186/s12870-020-2283-z 10.2175/106143007X184195 10.1093/aob/mcs285 10.1023/A:1010329902165 10.1104/pp.124.2.615 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118994 10.1104/pp.111.174987 10.3390/agriculture13122270 10.1017/S0033583512000157 10.1007/s42729-021-00436-w 10.3390/agronomy14010041 10.1080/15592324.2023.2217389 10.3390/ijms23094896 10.1071/CP19281 10.1080/01904167.2020.1729803 10.1071/CP07125 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.03.011 10.1104/pp.112.209254 10.1155/2014/506356 10.1086/701353 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.01233 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2001.tb00020.x 10.3390/plants10010051 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150101.x 10.1104/pp.111.175232 10.1104/pp.107.096958 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60489-X 10.3390/agronomy9110689 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2024 2024. The Author(s). Copyright Nature Publishing Group 2024 The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2024 – notice: 2024. The Author(s). – notice: Copyright Nature Publishing Group 2024 – notice: The Author(s) 2024 2024 |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88A 88E 88I 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. LK8 M0S M1P M2P M7P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-024-82071-w |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Proquest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Biology Database (Alumni Edition) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Science Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Database ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Science Database Biological Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Open Access Full Text |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Biology Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Open Access Full Text url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 5 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology |
| EISSN | 2045-2322 |
| EndPage | 16 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_ddab8e5e838b403cbf036b8cac2aff18 PMC11685770 39738241 10_1038_s41598_024_82071_w |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: The characteristic forestry industry research project of Guizhou province grantid: GZMC-ZD20202102 – fundername: The China National Key R&D Program grantid: 2022YFD1601712 |
| GroupedDBID | 0R~ 3V. 4.4 53G 5VS 7X7 88A 88E 88I 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAKDD ABDBF ABUWG ACGFS ACSMW ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AJTQC ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS AZQEC BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BHPHI BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU DIK DWQXO EBD EBLON EBS ESX FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HH5 HMCUK HYE KQ8 LK8 M0L M1P M2P M48 M7P M~E NAO OK1 PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RNT RNTTT RPM SNYQT UKHRP AASML AAYXX AFPKN CITATION PHGZM PHGZT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7XB 8FK AARCD K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-fed45c21b5287d3f8ca979251deb2494d178d03652af692c59f8e562ee5b74e53 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 2045-2322 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 00:37:51 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:35:45 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 22:48:29 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 11:33:44 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:11:47 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:06:30 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:44 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:36:03 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Low phosphorus stress Lam Screening evaluation Germplasm resources Gleditsia sinensis Lam |
| Language | English |
| License | 2024. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c541t-fed45c21b5287d3f8ca979251deb2494d178d03652af692c59f8e562ee5b74e53 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1038/s41598-024-82071-w |
| PMID | 39738241 |
| PQID | 3150196975 |
| PQPubID | 2041939 |
| PageCount | 16 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ddab8e5e838b403cbf036b8cac2aff18 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11685770 proquest_miscellaneous_3150346659 proquest_journals_3150196975 pubmed_primary_39738241 crossref_citationtrail_10_1038_s41598_024_82071_w crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_82071_w springer_journals_10_1038_s41598_024_82071_w |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2024-12-30 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-12-30 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2024 text: 2024-12-30 day: 30 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Scientific reports |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | Sci Rep |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Sci Rep |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK Nature Publishing Group Nature Portfolio |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Nature Publishing Group UK – name: Nature Publishing Group – name: Nature Portfolio |
| References | S Bichara (82071_CR78) 2021; 35 JA O’Rourke (82071_CR20) 2013; 161 J López-Bucio (82071_CR70) 2003; 6 P Withers (82071_CR9) 2001; 17 Z Ahmad (82071_CR50) 2001; 32 A Iqbal (82071_CR48) 2023; 23 82071_CR77 S Abel (82071_CR1) 2002; 115 82071_CR72 AM Fernandes (82071_CR82) 2016; 59 BL Chen (82071_CR40) 2020; 71 Q Wu (82071_CR59) 2016; 42 AE Richardson (82071_CR3) 2009; 60 M Abbas (82071_CR18) 2019; 35 CP Vance (82071_CR8) 2003; 157 WC Plaxton (82071_CR24) 2011; 156 S Cao (82071_CR33) 2019; 32 LB Owens (82071_CR10) 2011; 40 A Acharya (82071_CR68) 2023; 18 W Tantriani, Cheng (82071_CR47) 2023; 219 PP Wang (82071_CR62) 2019; 47 HF Dai (82071_CR36) 2014; 47 TT Hang (82071_CR79) 2024; 44 XH Zou (82071_CR83) 2018; 32 TC Zhang (82071_CR2) 2007; 79 M Zhang (82071_CR14) 2022; 14 Y Liu (82071_CR32) 2019; 223 Z Tan (82071_CR74) 2023; 13 JH Li (82071_CR27) 2019; 30 AY Hu (82071_CR41) 2021; 10 J Gao (82071_CR56) 2019; 40 B Forde (82071_CR71) 2001; 232 I Ciereszko (82071_CR21) 2011; 34 WC Lee (82071_CR45) 2021; 11 SCL Kamerlin (82071_CR38) 2013; 46 82071_CR39 YF Niu (82071_CR16) 2013; 112 S Haran (82071_CR23) 2000; 124 PR Soumya (82071_CR64) 2021; 21 P Li (82071_CR46) 2022; 8 A Iqbal (82071_CR51) 2019; 9 C Calderón-Vázquez (82071_CR35) 2011; 156 TR Bates (82071_CR19) 2000; 87 Y Dai (82071_CR76) 2024; 218 ZY Guan (82071_CR57) 2010; 43 ZY Li (82071_CR37) 2017; 50 J Zeng (82071_CR60) 2021; 34 JS Bayuelo-Jiménez (82071_CR67) 2011; 121 HC Zhang (82071_CR12) 2001; 25 82071_CR53 HY Duan (82071_CR42) 2009; 32 RR Kale (82071_CR44) 2021; 30 82071_CR52 C Hermans (82071_CR73) 2006; 11 WY Lin (82071_CR34) 2009; 60 C Li (82071_CR81) 2020; 43 H Zhao (82071_CR85) 2022; 23 YK Zhang (82071_CR15) 2013; 12 TT Sun (82071_CR80) 2021; 167 ZH Bai (82071_CR11) 2013; 372 JJ Li (82071_CR55) 2018; 41 82071_CR5 JB Shen (82071_CR7) 2011; 156 CT Yang (82071_CR49) 2018; 29 Q Liu (82071_CR30) 2023; 14 JC Yang (82071_CR4) 2012; 112 82071_CR65 JJ Li (82071_CR31) 2018; 43 MHU Rashid (82071_CR43) 2020; 34 X Qu (82071_CR86) 2020; 152 82071_CR22 Z Zhang (82071_CR25) 2014; 56 JJ Luo (82071_CR26) 2020; 20 SY Gong (82071_CR63) 2019; 25 82071_CR61 A Acharya (82071_CR69) 2022; 34 PD Johan (82071_CR6) 2021; 11 82071_CR17 X Hu (82071_CR54) 2020; 41 82071_CR58 F Xiao (82071_CR28) 2024; 270 J Zeng (82071_CR75) 2022; 13 G Hernández (82071_CR66) 2007; 144 L Wang (82071_CR29) 2020; 22 ABL Rondina (82071_CR13) 2019; 180 ZW Sun (82071_CR84) 2024; 14 |
| References_xml | – volume: 223 start-page: 115127 year: 2019 ident: 82071_CR32 publication-title: Carbohydr. Polym. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115127 – volume: 372 start-page: 27 year: 2013 ident: 82071_CR11 publication-title: Plant. Soil. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1696-y – ident: 82071_CR72 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00408 – volume: 6 start-page: 280 year: 2003 ident: 82071_CR70 publication-title: Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00035-9 – volume: 60 start-page: 1427 year: 2009 ident: 82071_CR34 publication-title: J. Exp. Bot. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern303 – volume: 56 start-page: 192 year: 2014 ident: 82071_CR25 publication-title: J. Integr. Plant Biol. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12163 – volume: 34 start-page: 37 year: 2022 ident: 82071_CR69 publication-title: Theor. Exp. Plant. Physiol. doi: 10.1007/s40626-021-00227-9 – volume: 14 start-page: 385 year: 2022 ident: 82071_CR14 publication-title: Diversity doi: 10.3390/d14050385 – ident: 82071_CR17 doi: 10.1155/2020/2148032 – ident: 82071_CR52 – volume: 14 start-page: 243 year: 2023 ident: 82071_CR30 publication-title: Forests doi: 10.3390/f14020243 – volume: 32 start-page: 897 year: 2018 ident: 82071_CR83 publication-title: Trees doi: 10.1007/s00468-018-1683-2 – volume: 156 start-page: 1006 year: 2011 ident: 82071_CR24 publication-title: Plant Physiol. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.175281 – ident: 82071_CR77 doi: 10.1007/s11104-024-06769-6 – volume: 219 start-page: 13 year: 2023 ident: 82071_CR47 publication-title: Euphytica doi: 10.1007/s10681-022-03145-2 – volume: 35 start-page: 17 year: 2019 ident: 82071_CR18 publication-title: Pakistan J. Agric. Agric. Eng. Veterinary Sci. – volume: 34 start-page: 166 year: 2021 ident: 82071_CR60 publication-title: For. Res. – volume: 87 start-page: 958 year: 2000 ident: 82071_CR19 publication-title: Am. J. Bot. doi: 10.2307/2656994 – volume: 44 start-page: tpad138 year: 2024 ident: 82071_CR79 publication-title: Tree Physiol. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpad138 – volume: 11 start-page: 2010 year: 2021 ident: 82071_CR6 publication-title: Agronomy doi: 10.3390/agronomy11102010 – ident: 82071_CR61 – volume: 25 start-page: 661 year: 2019 ident: 82071_CR63 publication-title: J. Plant. Nutr. Fertilizers – volume: 32 start-page: 171 year: 2001 ident: 82071_CR50 publication-title: Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. doi: 10.1081/CSS-100103001 – ident: 82071_CR39 doi: 10.1007/s11104-023-05976-x – volume: 41 start-page: 57 year: 2020 ident: 82071_CR54 publication-title: Food Ind. – volume: 152 start-page: 12 year: 2020 ident: 82071_CR86 publication-title: Plant Physiol. Biochem. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.04.030 – volume: 59 start-page: 259 year: 2016 ident: 82071_CR82 publication-title: Potato Res. doi: 10.1007/s11540-016-9330-z – volume: 167 start-page: 639 year: 2021 ident: 82071_CR80 publication-title: Plant Physiol. Biochem. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.08.040 – volume: 34 start-page: 825 year: 2020 ident: 82071_CR43 publication-title: Trees doi: 10.1007/s00468-020-01961-4 – volume: 25 start-page: 14 year: 2001 ident: 82071_CR12 publication-title: J. Nanjing Forestry Univ. – volume: 47 start-page: 8 year: 2019 ident: 82071_CR62 publication-title: Guizhou Agric. Sci. – volume: 40 start-page: 153 year: 2011 ident: 82071_CR10 publication-title: J. Environ. Qual. doi: 10.2134/jeq2010.0216 – volume: 34 start-page: 815 year: 2011 ident: 82071_CR21 publication-title: J. Plant Nutr. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2011.544351 – ident: 82071_CR22 doi: 10.1073/pnas.202474599 – volume: 8 start-page: 636 year: 2022 ident: 82071_CR46 publication-title: Horticulturae doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8070636 – ident: 82071_CR53 – volume: 30 start-page: 183 year: 2019 ident: 82071_CR27 publication-title: J. Res. doi: 10.1007/s11676-018-0597-6 – ident: 82071_CR65 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.983788 – volume: 270 start-page: 132235 year: 2024 ident: 82071_CR28 publication-title: Int. J. Biol. Macromol. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132235 – volume: 121 start-page: 350 year: 2011 ident: 82071_CR67 publication-title: Field Crops Res. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.001 – volume: 32 start-page: 1148 year: 2009 ident: 82071_CR42 publication-title: J. Plant Nutr. doi: 10.1080/01904160902943171 – volume: 22 start-page: 181 year: 2020 ident: 82071_CR29 publication-title: J. Liaoning Univ. TCM – volume: 43 start-page: 4063 year: 2010 ident: 82071_CR57 publication-title: Scientia Agricultura Sinica – volume: 13 start-page: 203 year: 2022 ident: 82071_CR75 publication-title: Forests doi: 10.3390/f13020203 – volume: 157 start-page: 423 year: 2003 ident: 82071_CR8 publication-title: New Phytol. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x – volume: 23 start-page: 168 year: 2023 ident: 82071_CR48 publication-title: BMC Plant. Biol. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04171-5 – volume: 11 start-page: 610 year: 2006 ident: 82071_CR73 publication-title: Trends Plant Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.10.007 – volume: 35 start-page: 1933 year: 2021 ident: 82071_CR78 publication-title: Trees doi: 10.1007/s00468-021-02161-4 – volume: 30 start-page: 275 year: 2021 ident: 82071_CR44 publication-title: J. Plant. Biochem. Biotechnol. doi: 10.1007/s13562-020-00586-5 – volume: 11 start-page: 668 year: 2021 ident: 82071_CR45 publication-title: Agriculture doi: 10.3390/agriculture11070668 – volume: 20 start-page: 85 year: 2020 ident: 82071_CR26 publication-title: BMC Plant Biol. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2283-z – volume: 79 start-page: 2343 year: 2007 ident: 82071_CR2 publication-title: Water Environ. Res. doi: 10.2175/106143007X184195 – volume: 41 start-page: 2296 year: 2018 ident: 82071_CR55 publication-title: J. Chin. Med. Mater. – volume: 112 start-page: 391 year: 2013 ident: 82071_CR16 publication-title: Ann. Botany doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs285 – volume: 232 start-page: 51 year: 2001 ident: 82071_CR71 publication-title: Plant. Soil. doi: 10.1023/A:1010329902165 – volume: 124 start-page: 615 year: 2000 ident: 82071_CR23 publication-title: Plant Physiol. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.2.615 – ident: 82071_CR58 – volume: 218 start-page: 118994 year: 2024 ident: 82071_CR76 publication-title: Ind. Crops Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118994 – volume: 156 start-page: 1067 year: 2011 ident: 82071_CR35 publication-title: Plant Physiol. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.174987 – volume: 13 start-page: 2270 year: 2023 ident: 82071_CR74 publication-title: Agriculture doi: 10.3390/agriculture13122270 – volume: 46 start-page: 1 year: 2013 ident: 82071_CR38 publication-title: Q. Rev. Biophys. doi: 10.1017/S0033583512000157 – volume: 47 start-page: 1290 year: 2014 ident: 82071_CR36 publication-title: Scientia Agricultura Sinica – volume: 21 start-page: 1236 year: 2021 ident: 82071_CR64 publication-title: J. Soil. Sci. Plant. Nutr. doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00436-w – volume: 14 start-page: 41 year: 2024 ident: 82071_CR84 publication-title: Agronomy doi: 10.3390/agronomy14010041 – volume: 18 start-page: 2217389 year: 2023 ident: 82071_CR68 publication-title: Plant Signal. Behav. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2023.2217389 – volume: 23 start-page: 4896 year: 2022 ident: 82071_CR85 publication-title: Int. J. Mol. Sci. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094896 – volume: 29 start-page: 2997 year: 2018 ident: 82071_CR49 publication-title: Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. – volume: 40 start-page: 124 year: 2019 ident: 82071_CR56 publication-title: Sci. Technol. Food Ind. – volume: 71 start-page: 56 year: 2020 ident: 82071_CR40 publication-title: Crop Pasture Sci. doi: 10.1071/CP19281 – volume: 43 start-page: 68 year: 2018 ident: 82071_CR31 publication-title: Biology Teach. – volume: 43 start-page: 1320 year: 2020 ident: 82071_CR81 publication-title: J. Plant Nutr. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2020.1729803 – volume: 60 start-page: 124 year: 2009 ident: 82071_CR3 publication-title: Crop Pasture Sci. doi: 10.1071/CP07125 – volume: 32 start-page: 78 year: 2019 ident: 82071_CR33 publication-title: World Forestry Res. – volume: 112 start-page: 64 year: 2012 ident: 82071_CR4 publication-title: J. Environ. Radioact. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.03.011 – volume: 161 start-page: 705 year: 2013 ident: 82071_CR20 publication-title: Plant Physiol. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.209254 – ident: 82071_CR5 doi: 10.1155/2014/506356 – volume: 180 start-page: 186 year: 2019 ident: 82071_CR13 publication-title: Int. J. Plant Sci. doi: 10.1086/701353 – volume: 42 start-page: 1233 year: 2016 ident: 82071_CR59 publication-title: Acta Agron. Sinica doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.01233 – volume: 17 start-page: 139 year: 2001 ident: 82071_CR9 publication-title: Soil Use Manag. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2001.tb00020.x – volume: 10 start-page: 51 year: 2021 ident: 82071_CR41 publication-title: Plants doi: 10.3390/plants10010051 – volume: 115 start-page: 1 year: 2002 ident: 82071_CR1 publication-title: Physiol. Plant. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150101.x – volume: 156 start-page: 997 year: 2011 ident: 82071_CR7 publication-title: Plant Physiol. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.175232 – volume: 50 start-page: 3898 year: 2017 ident: 82071_CR37 publication-title: Scientia Agricultura Sinica – volume: 144 start-page: 752 year: 2007 ident: 82071_CR66 publication-title: Plant Physiol. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.096958 – volume: 12 start-page: 1098 year: 2013 ident: 82071_CR15 publication-title: J. Integr. Agric. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60489-X – volume: 9 start-page: 689 year: 2019 ident: 82071_CR51 publication-title: Agronomy doi: 10.3390/agronomy9110689 |
| SSID | ssj0000529419 |
| Score | 2.4422596 |
| Snippet | This study aims to explore the low phosphorus (P) tolerance of saplings from different
Gleditsia sinensis
Lam. families. It also seeks to screen for
Gleditsia... This study aims to explore the low phosphorus (P) tolerance of saplings from different Gleditsia sinensis Lam. families. It also seeks to screen for Gleditsia... Abstract This study aims to explore the low phosphorus (P) tolerance of saplings from different Gleditsia sinensis Lam. families. It also seeks to screen for... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 31716 |
| SubjectTerms | 631/443 631/449 Biomass Dry weight Evaluation Germplasm Germplasm resources Gleditsia sinensis Gleditsia sinensis Lam Humanities and Social Sciences Lamiaceae - drug effects Lamiaceae - growth & development Lamiaceae - metabolism Lamiaceae - physiology Leaves Low phosphorus stress Morphology multidisciplinary Phosphorus Phosphorus - metabolism Plant Roots - drug effects Plant Roots - growth & development Plant Roots - metabolism Principal components analysis Regression analysis Science Science (multidisciplinary) Screening evaluation Sensitivity analysis Shoots |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Open Access Full Text dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlUOilNH26TYsKvbUmlvU-piFpKG0vbSA3IetBFnbtJfay5N9nJHs32T4vPfhiyTDMw_MNGn2D0DsRoc5QPJaycqFk2opSc-9KrxwXkQtp84ylr9_E2Tn7fMEv7oz6Sj1hIz3wqLhD722jAg-KqoZV1DUR_rmNctbVNkaSr_lCzrtTTI2s3rVmRE-3ZCqqDnvIVOk2Wc1KSHqSlOudTJQJ-3-HMn9tlvzpxDQnotNH6OGEIPHRKPk-uhfax-j-OFPy-gkavrvUSgOfYtt6PPNTO1C2AO4ivuX3xum82qWqu08L826Nl5ddD8_VqsdDNw-QyAYMMiyWALIXsB9_mkO2G_qZxalhvu1nPf5iF0_R-enJj-OzchqtUDrOyFDG4Bl3NWk4VEyeRtCnlhqwjodKm2nmiVQeFM1ByULXjusIRhB1CLyRLHD6DO21XRteICwUa4jggLx4YDERH1uZKHwAOgA4o7RAZKNm4ybe8TT-Ym7y-TdVZjSNAdOYbBqzLtD77TfLkXXjr7s_JuttdybG7PwC_MhMfmT-5UcFOtjY3kxh3BsKcDnxB0leoLfbZQjAdKpi29Ctxj2UCcF1gZ6PrrKVBMAeVYCRCqR2nGhH1N2VdnaZSb4JgRCSsirQh42_3cr1Z128_B-6eIUe1ClQEp9ldYD2hqtVeA3Ya2je5DC7AW8cLU4 priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Proquest Health & Medical Complete dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lj9MwELZgERIXxJvAgozEDayNYzt2TggQywoBF1iptyjxg63UJqVJVe2_35nETVUee8gldiRPZibz2TP5hpDXeYB9hlGB6dR6JosqZ4VyljljVR5Urquhx9K37_nZufwyU7N44NbFssrdN3H4ULvW4hn5iQDkglQuWr1b_WbYNQqzq7GFxk1yC6nL0Kr1TE9nLJjFkryI_8qkwpx0EK_wn7JMMgh9mrPtQTwaaPv_hTX_Lpn8I286hKPTe-RuxJH0_aj4--SGbx6Q22NnycuHpP9hsaAGHqVV4-jcxaKgQQ-0DXTP8k0xa21x793hwKLd0tVF28G13nS0bxcewllPYQ3LFUDtJcynnxcQ8_puXlEsm2-6eUe_VstH5Pz008-PZyw2WGBWSd6z4J1UNuO1gn2TE8HYqtAFIB4H-21ZSMe1cRDiVFaFvMisKoLxAJi8V7WWXonH5KhpG_-U0NzImucK8JfyMiD9caWRyAcABEA0IRLCd6-5tJF9HJtgLMohCy5MOaqmBNWUg2rKbULeTM-sRu6Na2d_QO1NM5E3e7jRrn-V0Q1L56oaRPBGmFqmwtYBxKtBbgsiBm4ScrzTfRmduSv3ppeQV9MwuCHmVqrGt5txjpB5roqEPBlNZVoJQD5hACklxBwY0cFSD0ea-cVA9c05OJLWaULe7uxtv67_v4tn14vxnNzJ0AWQrzI9Jkf9euNfALbq65eDA10BnJ0i8A priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Springer Nature HAS Fully OA dbid: AAJSJ link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LbxMxELZKKyQuiHe3FGQkbrBid_3cY0CUKgIupVJvltcPGinZjbIbRfz7jr2PKlCQOOQSj6WxZybzOTP-jNBb7uGcIZlPRWZcSkvN05JZk1ppGPeMCx3fWPr2nZ9f0vkVuzpAxXgXJjbtR0rL-DM9dod9aCHRhMtgBU0hZ4k83d1DR4GqHXz7aDabX8ynf1ZC7Yrm5XBDJiPyjsl7WSiS9d-FMP9slPytWhqT0Nkj9HBAj3jW6_sYHbj6Cbrfvyf56ynqLkxoo4GpWNcWL-zQChR3Hzce33J741CrNuHE3YaBZbPD6-umhc9m2-KuWTpIYh0GHVZrANgrkMdflpDpunahcWiWr9tFi7_q1TN0efb5x6fzdHhWITWM5l3qnaXMFHnF4LRkiZdGl6IEnGPhlE1LanMhLSQ2VmjPy8Kw0ksHMMk5VgnqGHmODuumdscIc0mrnDNAXcxRH0iPtQj0PQAbAJgRkqB83GZlBs7x8PTFUsXaN5GqN40C06hoGrVL0Ltpzrpn3Pin9MdgvUkysGXHL5rNTzV4j7JWV7AEJ4msaEZM5WF5FazbwBJ9LhN0OtpeDSHcKgJQOXAHCZagN9MwBF-oqOjaNdtehlDOWZmgF72rTJoA0CMS8FGC5J4T7am6P1IvriPBd55D-AiRJej96G-3ev19L07-T_wlelCEkAisldkpOuw2W_cKEFZXvR5C6gaKKSKX priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | Screening and identification of evaluation indicators of low phosphorus tolerant germplasm in Gleditsia sinensis Lam |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/s41598-024-82071-w https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39738241 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3150196975 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3150346659 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11685770 https://doaj.org/article/ddab8e5e838b403cbf036b8cac2aff18 |
| Volume | 14 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3di9NAEB_uA8EX8dvcnWUF3zTaJPuVB5FeufMo3iGehb6FZD-8QprUJqXef-9skvaoVsGHEMjOwu7ODPOb7O5vAF5zi3mGZNYXfWV8Gqfcj5lWvpaKccu4SJsaS5dX_GJMRxM22YN1uaNuAaudqZ2rJzVe5O9-_rj9iA7_ob0yLt9XGITcRbGQ-hjPROCv9uEQI5NwFQ0uO7jfcn2HMQ3i7u7M7q5b8amh8d-FPf88QvnbPmoTns4fwoMOV5JBawiPYM8Uj-FeW2ny9gnU18odsMGuJC00merukFCjF1Jacsf6TdwutnK5eOUa8nJF5jdlhc9iWZG6zA2Gt5rgGGZzhN4zlCefcoyBdTVNiTtGX1TTinxOZ09hfH72bXjhdwUXfMVoUPvWaMpUGGQM8ygdWanSWMSIgDTm3zSmOhBSY8hjYWp5HCoWW2kQQBnDMkENi57BQVEW5gUQLmkWcIZ4jBlqHR1yKhyxDwIKhGxR5EGwXuZEdWzkrihGnjS74pFMWtUkqJqkUU2y8uDNps-85eL4p_Sp095G0vFoNx_Kxfekc8tE6zTDKRgZyYz2I5VZnF6G81Y4RRtID07Wuk_WtplECKIdq5BgHrzaNKNbur2WtDDlspWJKOcs9uB5ayqbkSAEjCTapwdyy4i2hrrdUkxvGurvIEDHEqLvwdu1vd2N6-9rcfR_4sdwP3Qu4fgs-ydwUC-W5iVirzrrwb6YiB4cDgaj6xG-T8-uvnzFr0M-7DX_M3qNy_0CadcwuQ |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqIgQXxJtAASPBCaLmYcfOASFeZUu3vdBKezOJH3Sl3WTZZLXqn-I3MpPXann01kMusSPZntc3mfEMIS8TB36G5M4XgbY-S7PET7nRvpGaJ44nImt6LB2fJKMz9nXCJzvkV38XBtMqe53YKGpTavxHvh8DcsFSLoK_W_z0sWsURlf7FhotWxzZizW4bNXbw09A31dRdPD59OPI77oK-JqzsPadNYzrKMw5OAsmdlJnqUjBzBtwMlnKTCikAb3Oo8wlaaR56qQFlGAtzwWz2CUCVP41MLwBOntiIoZ_Ohg1Y2Ha3c0JYrlfgX3EO2wR88HUitBfb9m_pk3Av7Dt3ymaf8RpG_N3cJvc6nArfd8y2h2yY4u75HrbyfLiHqm_aUzggU9pVhg6NV0SUkN3Wjq6qSpOMUqu0devcGBWrunivKzgWa4qWpczC-azprCG-QKg_Rzm0y8zsLF1Nc0opukX1bSi42x-n5xdydE_ILtFWdhHhCaS5WHCAe9xyxyWW84EFg4CwAKQMI49EvbHrHRX7RybbsxUE3WPpWpJo4A0qiGNWnvk9fDNoq31censD0i9YSbW6W5elMsfqhN7ZUyWwxasjGXOgljnDraXw741bNGF0iN7Pe1VpzwqtWF1j7wYhkHsMZaTFbZctXNiliQ89cjDllWGlQDEjCUgM4_ILSbaWur2SDE9b0qLhyEIrhCBR970_LZZ1__P4vHl23hOboxOj8dqfHhy9ITcjFAcsFZmsEd26-XKPgVcV-fPGmGi5PtVS-9v-DRfaw |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEF5VqUBcEG8MBRYJTmAltne96wNClDa0tEQVUKm3rb0PGimxQ-wo6l_j1zHjR6Lw6K0HX7xraXfn9Y1ndoaQV7EDP0Ny54uBtj5L0thPuNG-kZrHjscirXssfRnFB6fs8xk_2yK_urswmFbZ6cRaUZtC4z_yfgTIBUu5CN53bVrEyd7w_eynjx2kMNLatdNoWOTIXi7BfSvfHe4BrV-H4XD_-8cDv-0w4GvOgsp31jCuwyDj4DiYyEmdJiIBk2_A4WQJM4GQBnQ8D1MXJ6HmiZMWEIO1PBPMYscIUP_bAr2iHtne3R-dfF394cEYGguS9qbOIJL9Eqwl3mgLmQ-GVwT-csMa1k0D_oV0_07Y_CNqWxvD4R1yu0Wx9EPDdnfJls3vkRtNX8vL-6T6pjGdBz6laW7o2LQpSTUX0MLRdY1xijFzjZ5_iQOTYklnF0UJz3xR0qqYWDCmFYU1TGcA9Kcwn36agMWtynFKMWk_L8clPU6nD8jptRz-Q9LLi9w-JjSWLAtiDuiPW-aw-HIqsIwQwBcAiFHkkaA7ZqXb2ufYgmOi6hh8JFVDGgWkUTVp1NIjb1bfzJrKH1fO3kXqrWZi1e76RTH_oVoloIxJM9iClZHM2CDSmYPtZbBvDVt0gfTITkd71aqSUq0Z3yMvV8OgBDCyk-a2WDRzIhbHPPHIo4ZVVisBwBlJwGkekRtMtLHUzZF8fFEXGg8CEGMhBh552_Hbel3_P4snV2_jBbkJkquOD0dHT8mtEKUBC2cOdkivmi_sMwB5Vfa8lSZKzq9bgH8DYIJlBg |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening+and+identification+of+evaluation+indicators+of+low+phosphorus+tolerant+germplasm+in+Gleditsia+sinensis+Lam&rft.jtitle=Scientific+reports&rft.au=Lu%2C+Chunyun&rft.au=Wang%2C+Xiurong&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Yang&rft.au=Zou%2C+Rong&rft.date=2024-12-30&rft.pub=Nature+Publishing+Group+UK&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038%2Fs41598-024-82071-w&rft.externalDocID=10_1038_s41598_024_82071_w |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2045-2322&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2045-2322&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2045-2322&client=summon |