Anticipatory responses of catecholamines on muscle force production

1 Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; and 2 Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey Submitted 22 May 2006 ; accepted in final form 28 August 2006 Few data exist on the temporal relati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 102; no. 1; pp. 94 - 102
Main Authors French, Duncan N, Kraemer, William J, Volek, Jeff S, Spiering, Barry A, Judelson, Daniel A, Hoffman, Jay R, Maresh, Carl M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bethesda, MD Am Physiological Soc 01.01.2007
American Physiological Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN8750-7587
1522-1601
DOI10.1152/japplphysiol.00586.2006

Cover

Abstract 1 Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; and 2 Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey Submitted 22 May 2006 ; accepted in final form 28 August 2006 Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1 ) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2 ) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F peak ) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F mean ) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased ( P 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F peak and F mean decreased by 20–25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F maintainers ) showed no decline ( P 0.05) in muscular performance (F peak , F mean ) during AHREP and that five subjects (F reducers ) had significant reductions in F peak and F mean . Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F peak were greater ( P < 0.02) for F maintainers than F reducers . In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise. epinephrine; norepinephrine; dopamine; strength; resistance exercise Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: W. J. Kraemer, Human Performance Laboratory, Dept. of Kinesiology, Unit 1110, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1110 (e-mail: William.Kraemer{at}uconn.edu )
AbstractList Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (...) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (...) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased (P ...= 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. ... and ... decreased by ...20-25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (...maintainers) showed no decline (P ...= 0.05) in muscular performance (...) during AHREP and that five subjects (...) had significant reductions in ... and ... Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F... were greater (P ... 0.02) for ... than ... In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise. (ProQuest Information and Learning: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)
1 Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; and 2 Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey Submitted 22 May 2006 ; accepted in final form 28 August 2006 Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1 ) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2 ) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F peak ) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F mean ) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased ( P 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F peak and F mean decreased by 20–25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F maintainers ) showed no decline ( P 0.05) in muscular performance (F peak , F mean ) during AHREP and that five subjects (F reducers ) had significant reductions in F peak and F mean . Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F peak were greater ( P < 0.02) for F maintainers than F reducers . In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise. epinephrine; norepinephrine; dopamine; strength; resistance exercise Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: W. J. Kraemer, Human Performance Laboratory, Dept. of Kinesiology, Unit 1110, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1110 (e-mail: William.Kraemer{at}uconn.edu )
Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 × 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F peak ) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F mean ) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased ( P ≤ 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F peak and F mean decreased by ∼20–25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F maintainers ) showed no decline ( P ≥ 0.05) in muscular performance (F peak , F mean ) during AHREP and that five subjects (F reducers ) had significant reductions in F peak and F mean . Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F peak were greater ( P < 0.02) for F maintainers than F reducers . In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise.
Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F(peak)) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F(mean)) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased (P <or= 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F(peak) and F(mean) decreased by approximately 20-25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F(maintainers)) showed no decline (P >or= 0.05) in muscular performance (F(peak), F(mean)) during AHREP and that five subjects (F(reducers)) had significant reductions in F(peak) and F(mean). Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F(peak) were greater (P < 0.02) for F(maintainers) than F(reducers). In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise.Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F(peak)) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F(mean)) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased (P <or= 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F(peak) and F(mean) decreased by approximately 20-25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F(maintainers)) showed no decline (P >or= 0.05) in muscular performance (F(peak), F(mean)) during AHREP and that five subjects (F(reducers)) had significant reductions in F(peak) and F(mean). Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F(peak) were greater (P < 0.02) for F(maintainers) than F(reducers). In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise.
Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F sub(peak)) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F sub(mean)) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased (P less than or equal to 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F sub(peak) and F sub(mean) decreased by similar to 20-25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F sub(maintainers)) showed no decline (P greater than or equal to 0.05) in muscular performance (F sub(peak), F sub(mean)) during AHREP and that five subjects (F sub(reducers)) had significant reductions in F sub(peak) and F sub(mean). Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F sub(peak) were greater (P < 0.02) for F sub(maintainers) than F sub(reducers). In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise.
Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F(peak)) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F(mean)) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased (P <or= 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F(peak) and F(mean) decreased by approximately 20-25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F(maintainers)) showed no decline (P >or= 0.05) in muscular performance (F(peak), F(mean)) during AHREP and that five subjects (F(reducers)) had significant reductions in F(peak) and F(mean). Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F(peak) were greater (P < 0.02) for F(maintainers) than F(reducers). In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise.
Author Volek, Jeff S
Judelson, Daniel A
French, Duncan N
Kraemer, William J
Hoffman, Jay R
Maresh, Carl M
Spiering, Barry A
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: French, Duncan N
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Kraemer, William J
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Volek, Jeff S
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Spiering, Barry A
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Judelson, Daniel A
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Hoffman, Jay R
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Maresh, Carl M
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18445714$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16959907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkV1rFDEUhoNU7Lb6F3QQ1KtZk5nJx1x4URarQsGbeh2yyUk3SyYZkxl0_70Zd6tSkIZAIHmenOS8F-gsxAAIvSJ4TQht3u_VOPpxd8gu-jXGVLB1gzF7glbltKkJw-QMrQSnuOZU8HN0kfMeY9J1lDxD54T1tO8xX6HNVZicdqOaYjpUCfIYQ4ZcRVtpNYHeRa8GF5adUA1z1h4qG5OGakzRzHpyMTxHT63yGV6c1kv07frj7eZzffP105fN1U2taUemGjRo2ygtmGkbBrZTgm2FpVxxa0HQlllmGsKM6AjuTE8t7rA1W85wD8KY9hK9Pd5bSn-fIU9ycFmD9ypAnLNkosOckvZRkPS05ZR2BXz9ANzHOYXyCdmUgctkBXp5gubtAEaOyQ0qHeR9Ewvw5gSorJW3SQXt8l9OlK5zslT7cOR0ijknsFK7SS0dnJJyXhIsl3Dlv-HK3-HKJdzi8wf-nxKPmu-O5s7d7X64BPIExbvDIpULGklkv7yx_T95PXt_Cz-nRbk35Ghs-wsNrc8p
CODEN JAPHEV
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00429_2016
crossref_primary_10_52082_jssm_2021_391
crossref_primary_10_3390_jfmk6010003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jevs_2010_12_005
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1748_1716_2010_02179_x
crossref_primary_10_1123_ijspp_2021_0221
crossref_primary_10_2337_diaspect_28_1_32
crossref_primary_10_1123_ijspp_2021_0340
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_thromres_2013_02_014
crossref_primary_10_1113_expphysiol_2009_048553
crossref_primary_10_1113_jphysiol_2013_255554
crossref_primary_10_1519_JSC_0000000000000392
crossref_primary_10_1519_JSC_0000000000001162
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18136953
crossref_primary_10_1002_jcp_30866
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12024_009_9100_1
crossref_primary_10_1113_EP088219
crossref_primary_10_3390_neurolint16060131
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physbeh_2012_05_009
crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_91235_2008
crossref_primary_10_7600_jspfsm_72_387
crossref_primary_10_1519_JSC_0000000000001758
crossref_primary_10_2165_11590430_000000000_00000
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2021_684848
crossref_primary_10_15171_ijbsm_2016_05
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13247728
crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03262294
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychsport_2008_05_004
crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpendo_00539_2015
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40798_022_00527_7
crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00039_2011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychsport_2017_11_014
crossref_primary_10_3109_10253891003743432
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2019_01007
crossref_primary_10_5432_jjpehss_23076
crossref_primary_10_1590_s1980_65742021002221
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbi_2021_07_010
crossref_primary_10_1097_JES_0b013e3181c5cde7
crossref_primary_10_1111_cpf_12443
crossref_primary_10_14814_phy2_12202
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjsem_2017_000229
crossref_primary_10_7600_jspfsm_73_233
crossref_primary_10_1519_JSC_0000000000004931
crossref_primary_10_47529_2223_2524_2022_3_3
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci2040649
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcjd_2013_07_020
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph191710608
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yhbeh_2011_09_006
Cites_doi 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.1.8
10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb10868.x
10.1519/00124278-200008000-00016
10.1007/BF00233847
10.1152/jappl.1974.37.2.247
10.1111/j.0954-6820.1984.tb04994.x
10.1123/ijsn.3.3.306
10.1152/jappl.1994.76.5.2157
10.1038/clpt.1981.3
10.1139/h99-034
10.1249/00005768-199107000-00012
10.2165/00007256-200333010-00004
10.1007/s00421-002-0591-7
10.1152/jappl.1991.71.4.1427
10.1139/h94-032
10.1123/jsp.6.3.351
10.1055/s-2008-1025663
10.1111/j.1600-0773.1980.tb02434.x
10.1046/j.1365-201X.2003.01124.x
10.1097/00005768-200208000-00020
10.1210/jcem.81.5.8626864
10.1152/jappl.1994.77.2.941
10.1152/jappl.1997.82.6.1869
10.1152/jappl.1985.59.4.1061
10.1152/jappl.1998.85.6.2352
10.1097/00005768-199904000-00010
10.1055/s-2007-1021240
10.1249/00005768-199107000-00013
10.1152/ajpregu.00392.2005
10.1097/00005768-200108000-00019
10.1152/ajpendo.1981.240.5.E526
10.1007/BF01185789
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2007 INIST-CNRS
Copyright American Physiological Society Jan 2007
Copyright_xml – notice: 2007 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright American Physiological Society Jan 2007
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7QR
7TK
7TS
7U7
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00586.2006
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Physical Education Index
Toxicology Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Technology Research Database
Toxicology Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Physical Education Index
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Technology Research Database

CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1522-1601
EndPage 102
ExternalDocumentID 1191549941
16959907
18445714
10_1152_japplphysiol_00586_2006
jap_102_1_94
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Feature
GroupedDBID -
02
2WC
39C
4.4
53G
55
5VS
85S
AALRV
ABFLS
ABOCM
ABUFD
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADBIT
AEILP
AENEX
AEULQ
AFDAS
AFRAH
AGCDD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FRP
GX1
H13
H~9
KQ8
L7B
MYA
NEJ
O0-
OHT
OK1
P-O
P2P
PQEST
PQQKQ
RAP
RHF
RHI
RPL
SJN
UHB
UKR
UPT
WH7
WOQ
X
X7M
YCJ
---
-~X
.55
.GJ
18M
1CY
29J
3O-
8M5
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABCQX
ABDNZ
ABHWK
ABJNI
ABKWE
ACBEA
ACGFO
ACKIV
ACYGS
ADFNX
ADXHL
AETEA
AFOSN
AGNAY
AI.
AIDAL
AJUXI
BKKCC
BTFSW
C2-
CITATION
EMOBN
ITBOX
J5H
MVM
P6G
RPRKH
TR2
VH1
W8F
XOL
XSW
YBH
YQJ
YQT
YWH
ZXP
~02
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
VXZ
7QP
7QR
7TK
7TS
7U7
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-ececf2ac86d326ef4a86b8f57a7ffe8536f6d216d84104d95f040fdb7609e8dd3
ISSN 8750-7587
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 14:26:39 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 21:33:17 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 08:33:13 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:43:09 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:13:27 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:48 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:13:18 EDT 2025
Tue Jan 05 17:53:31 EST 2021
Mon May 06 11:50:16 EDT 2019
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Epinephrine
Physical exercise
Vertebrata
Dopamine
Mammalia
strength
Muscle force
Neurotransmitter
Norepinephrine
resistance exercise
Catecholamine
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c541t-ececf2ac86d326ef4a86b8f57a7ffe8536f6d216d84104d95f040fdb7609e8dd3
Notes SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 16959907
PQID 222202206
PQPubID 40905
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pascalfrancis_primary_18445714
pubmed_primary_16959907
proquest_miscellaneous_68407513
crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00586_2006
proquest_miscellaneous_19537554
crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_japplphysiol_00586_2006
proquest_journals_222202206
highwire_physiology_jap_102_1_94
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20070101
2007-01-00
2007
2007-Jan
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2007-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2007
  text: 20070101
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Bethesda, MD
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Bethesda, MD
– name: United States
– name: Bethesda
PublicationTitle Journal of applied physiology (1985)
PublicationTitleAlternate J Appl Physiol (1985)
PublicationYear 2007
Publisher Am Physiological Soc
American Physiological Society
Publisher_xml – name: Am Physiological Soc
– name: American Physiological Society
References R21
R20
R23
R22
R25
R24
R27
R26
R29
R28
R4A
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R30
R10
R32
R31
R12
R11
R33
R14
R13
R16
R15
R18
R17
R19
References_xml – ident: R20
  doi: 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.1.8
– ident: R3
  doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb10868.x
– ident: R8
  doi: 10.1519/00124278-200008000-00016
– ident: R21
– ident: R13
  doi: 10.1007/BF00233847
– ident: R4A
  doi: 10.1152/jappl.1974.37.2.247
– ident: R5
  doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1984.tb04994.x
– ident: R10
  doi: 10.1123/ijsn.3.3.306
– ident: R1
  doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.5.2157
– ident: R6
  doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.3
– ident: R16
  doi: 10.1139/h99-034
– ident: R23
  doi: 10.1249/00005768-199107000-00012
– ident: R32
  doi: 10.2165/00007256-200333010-00004
– ident: R22
  doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0591-7
– ident: R28
  doi: 10.1152/jappl.1991.71.4.1427
– ident: R9
  doi: 10.1139/h94-032
– ident: R33
  doi: 10.1123/jsp.6.3.351
– ident: R12
– ident: R19
  doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1025663
– ident: R14
  doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1980.tb02434.x
– ident: R26
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2003.01124.x
– ident: R27
  doi: 10.1097/00005768-200208000-00020
– ident: R30
  doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.5.8626864
– ident: R11
  doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.2.941
– ident: R24
  doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.6.1869
– ident: R15
  doi: 10.1152/jappl.1985.59.4.1061
– ident: R7
  doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.6.2352
– ident: R2
  doi: 10.1097/00005768-199904000-00010
– ident: R18
  doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021240
– ident: R4
  doi: 10.1249/00005768-199107000-00013
– ident: R25
  doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00392.2005
– ident: R17
  doi: 10.1097/00005768-200108000-00019
– ident: R29
  doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1981.240.5.E526
– ident: R31
  doi: 10.1007/BF01185789
SSID ssj0014451
Score 2.132736
Snippet 1 Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; and 2 Department of Health and Exercise Science, The...
Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
highwire
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 94
SubjectTerms Adult
Arousal - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Blood
Catecholamines - blood
Cross-Over Studies
Dopamine - blood
Epinephrine - blood
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Homeostasis - physiology
Hormones
Humans
Male
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Neurotransmitters
Norepinephrine - blood
Physical Exertion - physiology
Testosterone - blood
Weight Lifting - physiology
Title Anticipatory responses of catecholamines on muscle force production
URI http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/102/1/94
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16959907
https://www.proquest.com/docview/222202206
https://www.proquest.com/docview/19537554
https://www.proquest.com/docview/68407513
Volume 102
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Nb9MwFLeqISEuCDY-wmD4gDiR0aSxnRyr0qll2phGh3az4sQ-rem0tofxV_An857tJC1tNeBSVandOO_98vy-_B4hH3KjsMyTCpMkK8JE8CJMOVOhVibHutiqa-sWnJ3z0VXy9Zpddzq_VrKWlgt1XPzceq7kf7gK14CveEr2Hzjb_ClcgO_AX_gEDsPnX_G4X_mcaAyU37lsV1dEFvOcrNk6xbR2jAhMl3OYjVmFBZ6NsnVea55sKqe5V06t48OVacKKTlnKVlwHJ5fD88HISi3YHUFQNGGd08s-thC1CXzOodOGn358Gw9P60Nkref1-8XYlrfyQRB4oP6aR0K06KmDTBf14izQfP5pK9nARuqGYKiINTHcjTfw5oSq64Lst2c_bFPys9h2HADyeNIcY8tEm4Wypdb2H3tgk5kIBm_CBHZGfxQLEWGS6JfxaROXwnJuzmPsHsBnDMLNP--49bq-U9egxhTcfA7EMa59ym77xuo5k2fkqccA7Tu0PScdXe2Tg34FIJve04-0Ifr9Pnl85jMzDshgFYu0wSKdGbqORTqrqMMitVikLRZfkKuT4WQwCn2DjrBgSbQIdaELE-dFykuwArRJ8pSr1DCRC2M0KILc8DKOeJkmYPWXGTOwZZhSCd7NdFqWvZdkr5pV-jWhzMSR0TxXiVFJHmvVA8WaYy-1MmKm7AaE12SUha9ej01UbqS1YlksV-kvLf2xxSoPSLeZeOsKuDw85VPNJ9m-ZhJ9QhNAC04DFMpIZom8LU1A6LbhMErWwwJytMbudiUebgE5rPkvvYCZS1DdYzwIDwt63_wK0h9DenmlZ8u5xCC4AItg9wgs5iRY1AvIKwer9t48Y6CLijcPLe6QPHERDXQ8viV7i7ulfgeq-EId2bfjN0m75Rw
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anticipatory+responses+of+catecholamines+on+muscle+force+production&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+applied+physiology+%281985%29&rft.au=FRENCH%2C+Duncan+N&rft.au=KRAEMER%2C+William+J&rft.au=VOIEK%2C+Jeff+S&rft.au=SPIERING%2C+Barry+A&rft.date=2007&rft.pub=American+Physiological+Society&rft.issn=8750-7587&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjapplphysiol.00586.2006&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=18445714
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon