Anticipatory responses of catecholamines on muscle force production
1 Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; and 2 Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey Submitted 22 May 2006 ; accepted in final form 28 August 2006 Few data exist on the temporal relati...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 102; no. 1; pp. 94 - 102 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bethesda, MD
Am Physiological Soc
01.01.2007
American Physiological Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 8750-7587 1522-1601 |
DOI | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00586.2006 |
Cover
Abstract | 1 Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; and 2 Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey
Submitted 22 May 2006
; accepted in final form 28 August 2006
Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1 ) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2 ) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F peak ) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F mean ) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased ( P 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F peak and F mean decreased by 2025% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F maintainers ) showed no decline ( P 0.05) in muscular performance (F peak , F mean ) during AHREP and that five subjects (F reducers ) had significant reductions in F peak and F mean . Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F peak were greater ( P < 0.02) for F maintainers than F reducers . In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise.
epinephrine; norepinephrine; dopamine; strength; resistance exercise
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: W. J. Kraemer, Human Performance Laboratory, Dept. of Kinesiology, Unit 1110, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1110 (e-mail: William.Kraemer{at}uconn.edu ) |
---|---|
AbstractList | Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (...) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (...) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased (P ...= 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. ... and ... decreased by ...20-25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (...maintainers) showed no decline (P ...= 0.05) in muscular performance (...) during AHREP and that five subjects (...) had significant reductions in ... and ... Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F... were greater (P ... 0.02) for ... than ... In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise. (ProQuest Information and Learning: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.) 1 Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; and 2 Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey Submitted 22 May 2006 ; accepted in final form 28 August 2006 Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1 ) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2 ) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F peak ) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F mean ) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased ( P 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F peak and F mean decreased by 2025% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F maintainers ) showed no decline ( P 0.05) in muscular performance (F peak , F mean ) during AHREP and that five subjects (F reducers ) had significant reductions in F peak and F mean . Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F peak were greater ( P < 0.02) for F maintainers than F reducers . In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise. epinephrine; norepinephrine; dopamine; strength; resistance exercise Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: W. J. Kraemer, Human Performance Laboratory, Dept. of Kinesiology, Unit 1110, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1110 (e-mail: William.Kraemer{at}uconn.edu ) Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 × 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F peak ) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F mean ) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased ( P ≤ 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F peak and F mean decreased by ∼20–25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F maintainers ) showed no decline ( P ≥ 0.05) in muscular performance (F peak , F mean ) during AHREP and that five subjects (F reducers ) had significant reductions in F peak and F mean . Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F peak were greater ( P < 0.02) for F maintainers than F reducers . In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise. Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F(peak)) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F(mean)) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased (P <or= 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F(peak) and F(mean) decreased by approximately 20-25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F(maintainers)) showed no decline (P >or= 0.05) in muscular performance (F(peak), F(mean)) during AHREP and that five subjects (F(reducers)) had significant reductions in F(peak) and F(mean). Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F(peak) were greater (P < 0.02) for F(maintainers) than F(reducers). In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise.Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F(peak)) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F(mean)) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased (P <or= 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F(peak) and F(mean) decreased by approximately 20-25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F(maintainers)) showed no decline (P >or= 0.05) in muscular performance (F(peak), F(mean)) during AHREP and that five subjects (F(reducers)) had significant reductions in F(peak) and F(mean). Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F(peak) were greater (P < 0.02) for F(maintainers) than F(reducers). In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise. Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F sub(peak)) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F sub(mean)) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased (P less than or equal to 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F sub(peak) and F sub(mean) decreased by similar to 20-25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F sub(maintainers)) showed no decline (P greater than or equal to 0.05) in muscular performance (F sub(peak), F sub(mean)) during AHREP and that five subjects (F sub(reducers)) had significant reductions in F sub(peak) and F sub(mean). Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F sub(peak) were greater (P < 0.02) for F sub(maintainers) than F sub(reducers). In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise. Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of preexercise arousal on sympathoadrenal neurohormones on muscular force expression during resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men completed two experimental conditions separated by 7 days: 1) acute heavy resistance exercise protocol (AHREP; 6 x 10 repetitions parallel squats, 80% 1 repetition maximum) and 2) control (Cont; rest). Peak force (F(peak)) was recorded during a maximal isometric squat preceding each set and mean force (F(mean)) was measured during each set. Serial venous blood samples were collected before the AHREP and immediately preceding each set. Blood collection times were matched during Cont. Preexercise epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA) increased (P <or= 0.05) above Cont by 270, 255, and 164%, respectively. During exercise, Epi, NE, and DA continued to increase by 512, 271, and 38%, respectively, above preexercise values. F(peak) and F(mean) decreased by approximately 20-25% over the course of the AHREP. Post hoc data analysis revealed that five subjects (F(maintainers)) showed no decline (P >or= 0.05) in muscular performance (F(peak), F(mean)) during AHREP and that five subjects (F(reducers)) had significant reductions in F(peak) and F(mean). Integrated area under the curve for Epi, NE, and F(peak) were greater (P < 0.02) for F(maintainers) than F(reducers). In conclusion, an anticipatory rise in catecholamines existed, which may be essential for optimal force production at the onset of exercise. |
Author | Volek, Jeff S Judelson, Daniel A French, Duncan N Kraemer, William J Hoffman, Jay R Maresh, Carl M Spiering, Barry A |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: French, Duncan N – sequence: 2 fullname: Kraemer, William J – sequence: 3 fullname: Volek, Jeff S – sequence: 4 fullname: Spiering, Barry A – sequence: 5 fullname: Judelson, Daniel A – sequence: 6 fullname: Hoffman, Jay R – sequence: 7 fullname: Maresh, Carl M |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18445714$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16959907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkV1rFDEUhoNU7Lb6F3QQ1KtZk5nJx1x4URarQsGbeh2yyUk3SyYZkxl0_70Zd6tSkIZAIHmenOS8F-gsxAAIvSJ4TQht3u_VOPpxd8gu-jXGVLB1gzF7glbltKkJw-QMrQSnuOZU8HN0kfMeY9J1lDxD54T1tO8xX6HNVZicdqOaYjpUCfIYQ4ZcRVtpNYHeRa8GF5adUA1z1h4qG5OGakzRzHpyMTxHT63yGV6c1kv07frj7eZzffP105fN1U2taUemGjRo2ygtmGkbBrZTgm2FpVxxa0HQlllmGsKM6AjuTE8t7rA1W85wD8KY9hK9Pd5bSn-fIU9ycFmD9ypAnLNkosOckvZRkPS05ZR2BXz9ANzHOYXyCdmUgctkBXp5gubtAEaOyQ0qHeR9Ewvw5gSorJW3SQXt8l9OlK5zslT7cOR0ijknsFK7SS0dnJJyXhIsl3Dlv-HK3-HKJdzi8wf-nxKPmu-O5s7d7X64BPIExbvDIpULGklkv7yx_T95PXt_Cz-nRbk35Ghs-wsNrc8p |
CODEN | JAPHEV |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00429_2016 crossref_primary_10_52082_jssm_2021_391 crossref_primary_10_3390_jfmk6010003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jevs_2010_12_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1748_1716_2010_02179_x crossref_primary_10_1123_ijspp_2021_0221 crossref_primary_10_2337_diaspect_28_1_32 crossref_primary_10_1123_ijspp_2021_0340 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_thromres_2013_02_014 crossref_primary_10_1113_expphysiol_2009_048553 crossref_primary_10_1113_jphysiol_2013_255554 crossref_primary_10_1519_JSC_0000000000000392 crossref_primary_10_1519_JSC_0000000000001162 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18136953 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcp_30866 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12024_009_9100_1 crossref_primary_10_1113_EP088219 crossref_primary_10_3390_neurolint16060131 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physbeh_2012_05_009 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_91235_2008 crossref_primary_10_7600_jspfsm_72_387 crossref_primary_10_1519_JSC_0000000000001758 crossref_primary_10_2165_11590430_000000000_00000 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2021_684848 crossref_primary_10_15171_ijbsm_2016_05 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13247728 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03262294 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychsport_2008_05_004 crossref_primary_10_1152_ajpendo_00539_2015 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40798_022_00527_7 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00039_2011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychsport_2017_11_014 crossref_primary_10_3109_10253891003743432 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2019_01007 crossref_primary_10_5432_jjpehss_23076 crossref_primary_10_1590_s1980_65742021002221 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbi_2021_07_010 crossref_primary_10_1097_JES_0b013e3181c5cde7 crossref_primary_10_1111_cpf_12443 crossref_primary_10_14814_phy2_12202 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjsem_2017_000229 crossref_primary_10_7600_jspfsm_73_233 crossref_primary_10_1519_JSC_0000000000004931 crossref_primary_10_47529_2223_2524_2022_3_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci2040649 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcjd_2013_07_020 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph191710608 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yhbeh_2011_09_006 |
Cites_doi | 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.1.8 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb10868.x 10.1519/00124278-200008000-00016 10.1007/BF00233847 10.1152/jappl.1974.37.2.247 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1984.tb04994.x 10.1123/ijsn.3.3.306 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.5.2157 10.1038/clpt.1981.3 10.1139/h99-034 10.1249/00005768-199107000-00012 10.2165/00007256-200333010-00004 10.1007/s00421-002-0591-7 10.1152/jappl.1991.71.4.1427 10.1139/h94-032 10.1123/jsp.6.3.351 10.1055/s-2008-1025663 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1980.tb02434.x 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2003.01124.x 10.1097/00005768-200208000-00020 10.1210/jcem.81.5.8626864 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.2.941 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.6.1869 10.1152/jappl.1985.59.4.1061 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.6.2352 10.1097/00005768-199904000-00010 10.1055/s-2007-1021240 10.1249/00005768-199107000-00013 10.1152/ajpregu.00392.2005 10.1097/00005768-200108000-00019 10.1152/ajpendo.1981.240.5.E526 10.1007/BF01185789 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2007 INIST-CNRS Copyright American Physiological Society Jan 2007 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2007 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright American Physiological Society Jan 2007 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7QR 7TK 7TS 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00586.2006 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Physical Education Index Toxicology Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Engineering Research Database Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Physical Education Index Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Technology Research Database CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1522-1601 |
EndPage | 102 |
ExternalDocumentID | 1191549941 16959907 18445714 10_1152_japplphysiol_00586_2006 jap_102_1_94 |
Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article Feature |
GroupedDBID | - 02 2WC 39C 4.4 53G 55 5VS 85S AALRV ABFLS ABOCM ABUFD ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ADBBV ADBIT AEILP AENEX AEULQ AFDAS AFRAH AGCDD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL C1A CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD F5P FRP GX1 H13 H~9 KQ8 L7B MYA NEJ O0- OHT OK1 P-O P2P PQEST PQQKQ RAP RHF RHI RPL SJN UHB UKR UPT WH7 WOQ X X7M YCJ --- -~X .55 .GJ 18M 1CY 29J 3O- 8M5 AAFWJ AAYXX ABCQX ABDNZ ABHWK ABJNI ABKWE ACBEA ACGFO ACKIV ACYGS ADFNX ADXHL AETEA AFOSN AGNAY AI. AIDAL AJUXI BKKCC BTFSW C2- CITATION EMOBN ITBOX J5H MVM P6G RPRKH TR2 VH1 W8F XOL XSW YBH YQJ YQT YWH ZXP ~02 IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM VXZ 7QP 7QR 7TK 7TS 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-ececf2ac86d326ef4a86b8f57a7ffe8536f6d216d84104d95f040fdb7609e8dd3 |
ISSN | 8750-7587 |
IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 14:26:39 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 21:33:17 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 08:33:13 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:43:09 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:13:27 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:48 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:13:18 EDT 2025 Tue Jan 05 17:53:31 EST 2021 Mon May 06 11:50:16 EDT 2019 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Epinephrine Physical exercise Vertebrata Dopamine Mammalia strength Muscle force Neurotransmitter Norepinephrine resistance exercise Catecholamine |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c541t-ececf2ac86d326ef4a86b8f57a7ffe8536f6d216d84104d95f040fdb7609e8dd3 |
Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
PMID | 16959907 |
PQID | 222202206 |
PQPubID | 40905 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | pascalfrancis_primary_18445714 pubmed_primary_16959907 proquest_miscellaneous_68407513 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00586_2006 proquest_miscellaneous_19537554 crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_japplphysiol_00586_2006 proquest_journals_222202206 highwire_physiology_jap_102_1_94 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20070101 2007-01-00 2007 2007-Jan |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2007-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2007 text: 20070101 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Bethesda, MD |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Bethesda, MD – name: United States – name: Bethesda |
PublicationTitle | Journal of applied physiology (1985) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Appl Physiol (1985) |
PublicationYear | 2007 |
Publisher | Am Physiological Soc American Physiological Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: Am Physiological Soc – name: American Physiological Society |
References | R21 R20 R23 R22 R25 R24 R27 R26 R29 R28 R4A R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R30 R10 R32 R31 R12 R11 R33 R14 R13 R16 R15 R18 R17 R19 |
References_xml | – ident: R20 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.1.8 – ident: R3 doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb10868.x – ident: R8 doi: 10.1519/00124278-200008000-00016 – ident: R21 – ident: R13 doi: 10.1007/BF00233847 – ident: R4A doi: 10.1152/jappl.1974.37.2.247 – ident: R5 doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1984.tb04994.x – ident: R10 doi: 10.1123/ijsn.3.3.306 – ident: R1 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.5.2157 – ident: R6 doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.3 – ident: R16 doi: 10.1139/h99-034 – ident: R23 doi: 10.1249/00005768-199107000-00012 – ident: R32 doi: 10.2165/00007256-200333010-00004 – ident: R22 doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0591-7 – ident: R28 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1991.71.4.1427 – ident: R9 doi: 10.1139/h94-032 – ident: R33 doi: 10.1123/jsp.6.3.351 – ident: R12 – ident: R19 doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1025663 – ident: R14 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1980.tb02434.x – ident: R26 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2003.01124.x – ident: R27 doi: 10.1097/00005768-200208000-00020 – ident: R30 doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.5.8626864 – ident: R11 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.2.941 – ident: R24 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.6.1869 – ident: R15 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1985.59.4.1061 – ident: R7 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.6.2352 – ident: R2 doi: 10.1097/00005768-199904000-00010 – ident: R18 doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021240 – ident: R4 doi: 10.1249/00005768-199107000-00013 – ident: R25 doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00392.2005 – ident: R17 doi: 10.1097/00005768-200108000-00019 – ident: R29 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1981.240.5.E526 – ident: R31 doi: 10.1007/BF01185789 |
SSID | ssj0014451 |
Score | 2.132736 |
Snippet | 1 Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; and 2 Department of Health and Exercise Science, The... Few data exist on the temporal relationship between catecholamines and muscle force production in vivo. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref highwire |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 94 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Arousal - physiology Biological and medical sciences Blood Catecholamines - blood Cross-Over Studies Dopamine - blood Epinephrine - blood Exercise Exercise - physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Homeostasis - physiology Hormones Humans Male Muscle Contraction - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Neurotransmitters Norepinephrine - blood Physical Exertion - physiology Testosterone - blood Weight Lifting - physiology |
Title | Anticipatory responses of catecholamines on muscle force production |
URI | http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/102/1/94 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16959907 https://www.proquest.com/docview/222202206 https://www.proquest.com/docview/19537554 https://www.proquest.com/docview/68407513 |
Volume | 102 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Nb9MwFLeqISEuCDY-wmD4gDiR0aSxnRyr0qll2phGh3az4sQ-rem0tofxV_An857tJC1tNeBSVandOO_98vy-_B4hH3KjsMyTCpMkK8JE8CJMOVOhVibHutiqa-sWnJ3z0VXy9Zpddzq_VrKWlgt1XPzceq7kf7gK14CveEr2Hzjb_ClcgO_AX_gEDsPnX_G4X_mcaAyU37lsV1dEFvOcrNk6xbR2jAhMl3OYjVmFBZ6NsnVea55sKqe5V06t48OVacKKTlnKVlwHJ5fD88HISi3YHUFQNGGd08s-thC1CXzOodOGn358Gw9P60Nkref1-8XYlrfyQRB4oP6aR0K06KmDTBf14izQfP5pK9nARuqGYKiINTHcjTfw5oSq64Lst2c_bFPys9h2HADyeNIcY8tEm4Wypdb2H3tgk5kIBm_CBHZGfxQLEWGS6JfxaROXwnJuzmPsHsBnDMLNP--49bq-U9egxhTcfA7EMa59ym77xuo5k2fkqccA7Tu0PScdXe2Tg34FIJve04-0Ifr9Pnl85jMzDshgFYu0wSKdGbqORTqrqMMitVikLRZfkKuT4WQwCn2DjrBgSbQIdaELE-dFykuwArRJ8pSr1DCRC2M0KILc8DKOeJkmYPWXGTOwZZhSCd7NdFqWvZdkr5pV-jWhzMSR0TxXiVFJHmvVA8WaYy-1MmKm7AaE12SUha9ej01UbqS1YlksV-kvLf2xxSoPSLeZeOsKuDw85VPNJ9m-ZhJ9QhNAC04DFMpIZom8LU1A6LbhMErWwwJytMbudiUebgE5rPkvvYCZS1DdYzwIDwt63_wK0h9DenmlZ8u5xCC4AItg9wgs5iRY1AvIKwer9t48Y6CLijcPLe6QPHERDXQ8viV7i7ulfgeq-EId2bfjN0m75Rw |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anticipatory+responses+of+catecholamines+on+muscle+force+production&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+applied+physiology+%281985%29&rft.au=FRENCH%2C+Duncan+N&rft.au=KRAEMER%2C+William+J&rft.au=VOIEK%2C+Jeff+S&rft.au=SPIERING%2C+Barry+A&rft.date=2007&rft.pub=American+Physiological+Society&rft.issn=8750-7587&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjapplphysiol.00586.2006&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=18445714 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon |