Comparative study on landslide susceptibility mapping based on unbalanced sample ratio

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 5823 - 23
• Main Authors: Tang, Li, Yu, Xianyu, Jiang, Weiwei, Zhou, Jianguo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 10.04.2023; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 704/172; 704/4111; Canyons; Comparative studies; Humanities and Social Sciences; Landslides; Mapping; multidisciplinary; Neural networks; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Statistical methods; Support vector machines; Susceptibility; Training
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33186-z
• ISSN: 2045-2322

The Zigui–Badong section of the Three Gorges Reservoir area is used as the research area in this study to research the impact of unbalanced sample sets on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) and determine the sample ratio interval with the best performance for different models. We employ 12 LSM factors, five training sample sets with different sample ratios (1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16), and C5.0, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and one-dimensional Convolution Neural Network (CNN) models are used to obtain landslide susceptibility index and landslide susceptibility zoning in the study area, respectively. The prediction performance of the model is evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve value, five statistical methods, and specific category precision. The results show that the CNN, SVM, and LR models in the sample ratio of 1:2 achieve better performance than on the balanced sample set, which indicates the importance of the unbalanced sample set in training the LSM modeling. The C5.0 model is always in a state of overfitting in this study and needs to be further studied. The conclusions put forward in this study help improve the scientificity and reliability of LSM.