Simulation video: a tool to evaluate communications skills in radiologist residents

Background Effective communication is a crucial component of radiology resident training, and many different aspects need to be explored when teaching and evaluating communication skills. To ensure that radiology residents' communication skill levels can be measured accurately, a standardized e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC medical education Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 7
Main Authors Ding, Ning, Hu, Ge, Wang, Xuan, Sun, Hao, Song, Lan, Chen, Yu, Zhang, Daming, Xue, Huadan, Jin, Zhengyu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central Ltd 18.08.2023
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Aerospace Education
Armed Forces
Candidates
Communication Skills
Curricula
Data Analysis
Doctoral Degrees
Educational aspects
Educational Innovation
Evaluation model
Evaluators
Examiners
Hospitals
Measurement Techniques
Medical education
Medical imaging
Medical students
National Surveys
Patients
Radiology
Radiology education
Radiology, Medical
Simulated patients
Simulation
Simulation video
Skill Analysis
Skills
State Surveys
Statistical Significance
Training
Training Objectives
Verbal communication
Video Technology
China
Beijing China
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract Background Effective communication is a crucial component of radiology resident training, and many different aspects need to be explored when teaching and evaluating communication skills. To ensure that radiology residents' communication skill levels can be measured accurately, a standardized evaluation tool has been introduced. In twenty hospitals in Beijing, simulation videos have been developed as a way to assess the communication skills of radiology residents during their certification exams, to minimize evaluating biases. This study aims to assess the performance of a simulation video model in evaluating communications skills compared to the standard patient model. Methods This is a retrospective observational study. The performance of standard patient and simulation video models was evaluated through an eight-year examination of communication skills in radiology residents. From 2014 to 2021, communications skill tests were administered to 1003 radiology residents in 20 hospitals in Beijing. The standardized patient (SP) model was applied in 2014, and simulation videos were used from 2015 to 2021. The difficulty and discrimination radio of the tests were evaluated. The subjective survey for candidates on two models of communication skills evaluation was performed and analyzed. Results The simulation video model evaluation demonstrated stable difficulty (ranging from 0.92 to 0.98) and discrimination ratio (ranging from 0.37 to 0.49), except for minor exceptions of discrimination in 2019 (0.58) and 2020 (0.20). Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed no significant differences in average scores between 2016 (93.9 [+ or -] 4.6) and 2018 (94.5 [+ or -] 4.2), 2016 and 2019 (97.3 [+ or -] 3.9), 2017 (97.0 [+ or -] 5.6) and 2019, 2017 and 2020 (97.7 [+ or -] 4.7), as well as 2019 and 2020 exams (all p [greater than or equal to] 0.05). In addition, candidates who responded to the survey preferred the simulation video model (with a 77.2% response rate), with 62.7% choosing it over the SP model for communication skills evaluation. Conclusion The simulation video demonstrated a stable and better acceptable construct for assessing radiology residents' communication skills. Keywords: Communication skills, Radiology education, Evaluation model, Simulation video
AbstractList BackgroundEffective communication is a crucial component of radiology resident training, and many different aspects need to be explored when teaching and evaluating communication skills. To ensure that radiology residents’ communication skill levels can be measured accurately, a standardized evaluation tool has been introduced. In twenty hospitals in Beijing, simulation videos have been developed as a way to assess the communication skills of radiology residents during their certification exams, to minimize evaluating biases. This study aims to assess the performance of a simulation video model in evaluating communications skills compared to the standard patient model.MethodsThis is a retrospective observational study. The performance of standard patient and simulation video models was evaluated through an eight-year examination of communication skills in radiology residents. From 2014 to 2021, communications skill tests were administered to 1003 radiology residents in 20 hospitals in Beijing. The standardized patient (SP) model was applied in 2014, and simulation videos were used from 2015 to 2021. The difficulty and discrimination radio of the tests were evaluated. The subjective survey for candidates on two models of communication skills evaluation was performed and analyzed.ResultsThe simulation video model evaluation demonstrated stable difficulty (ranging from 0.92 to 0.98) and discrimination ratio (ranging from 0.37 to 0.49), except for minor exceptions of discrimination in 2019 (0.58) and 2020 (0.20). Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed no significant differences in average scores between 2016 (93.9 ± 4.6) and 2018 (94.5 ± 4.2), 2016 and 2019 (97.3 ± 3.9), 2017 (97.0 ± 5.6) and 2019, 2017 and 2020 (97.7 ± 4.7), as well as 2019 and 2020 exams (all p ≥ 0.05). In addition, candidates who responded to the survey preferred the simulation video model (with a 77.2% response rate), with 62.7% choosing it over the SP model for communication skills evaluation.ConclusionThe simulation video demonstrated a stable and better acceptable construct for assessing radiology residents’ communication skills.
Effective communication is a crucial component of radiology resident training, and many different aspects need to be explored when teaching and evaluating communication skills. To ensure that radiology residents' communication skill levels can be measured accurately, a standardized evaluation tool has been introduced. In twenty hospitals in Beijing, simulation videos have been developed as a way to assess the communication skills of radiology residents during their certification exams, to minimize evaluating biases. This study aims to assess the performance of a simulation video model in evaluating communications skills compared to the standard patient model. This is a retrospective observational study. The performance of standard patient and simulation video models was evaluated through an eight-year examination of communication skills in radiology residents. From 2014 to 2021, communications skill tests were administered to 1003 radiology residents in 20 hospitals in Beijing. The standardized patient (SP) model was applied in 2014, and simulation videos were used from 2015 to 2021. The difficulty and discrimination radio of the tests were evaluated. The subjective survey for candidates on two models of communication skills evaluation was performed and analyzed. The simulation video model evaluation demonstrated stable difficulty (ranging from 0.92 to 0.98) and discrimination ratio (ranging from 0.37 to 0.49), except for minor exceptions of discrimination in 2019 (0.58) and 2020 (0.20). Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed no significant differences in average scores between 2016 (93.9 [+ or -] 4.6) and 2018 (94.5 [+ or -] 4.2), 2016 and 2019 (97.3 [+ or -] 3.9), 2017 (97.0 [+ or -] 5.6) and 2019, 2017 and 2020 (97.7 [+ or -] 4.7), as well as 2019 and 2020 exams (all p [greater than or equal to] 0.05). In addition, candidates who responded to the survey preferred the simulation video model (with a 77.2% response rate), with 62.7% choosing it over the SP model for communication skills evaluation. The simulation video demonstrated a stable and better acceptable construct for assessing radiology residents' communication skills.
Effective communication is a crucial component of radiology resident training, and many different aspects need to be explored when teaching and evaluating communication skills. To ensure that radiology residents' communication skill levels can be measured accurately, a standardized evaluation tool has been introduced. In twenty hospitals in Beijing, simulation videos have been developed as a way to assess the communication skills of radiology residents during their certification exams, to minimize evaluating biases. This study aims to assess the performance of a simulation video model in evaluating communications skills compared to the standard patient model.BACKGROUNDEffective communication is a crucial component of radiology resident training, and many different aspects need to be explored when teaching and evaluating communication skills. To ensure that radiology residents' communication skill levels can be measured accurately, a standardized evaluation tool has been introduced. In twenty hospitals in Beijing, simulation videos have been developed as a way to assess the communication skills of radiology residents during their certification exams, to minimize evaluating biases. This study aims to assess the performance of a simulation video model in evaluating communications skills compared to the standard patient model.This is a retrospective observational study. The performance of standard patient and simulation video models was evaluated through an eight-year examination of communication skills in radiology residents. From 2014 to 2021, communications skill tests were administered to 1003 radiology residents in 20 hospitals in Beijing. The standardized patient (SP) model was applied in 2014, and simulation videos were used from 2015 to 2021. The difficulty and discrimination radio of the tests were evaluated. The subjective survey for candidates on two models of communication skills evaluation was performed and analyzed.METHODSThis is a retrospective observational study. The performance of standard patient and simulation video models was evaluated through an eight-year examination of communication skills in radiology residents. From 2014 to 2021, communications skill tests were administered to 1003 radiology residents in 20 hospitals in Beijing. The standardized patient (SP) model was applied in 2014, and simulation videos were used from 2015 to 2021. The difficulty and discrimination radio of the tests were evaluated. The subjective survey for candidates on two models of communication skills evaluation was performed and analyzed.The simulation video model evaluation demonstrated stable difficulty (ranging from 0.92 to 0.98) and discrimination ratio (ranging from 0.37 to 0.49), except for minor exceptions of discrimination in 2019 (0.58) and 2020 (0.20). Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed no significant differences in average scores between 2016 (93.9 ± 4.6) and 2018 (94.5 ± 4.2), 2016 and 2019 (97.3 ± 3.9), 2017 (97.0 ± 5.6) and 2019, 2017 and 2020 (97.7 ± 4.7), as well as 2019 and 2020 exams (all p ≥ 0.05). In addition, candidates who responded to the survey preferred the simulation video model (with a 77.2% response rate), with 62.7% choosing it over the SP model for communication skills evaluation.RESULTSThe simulation video model evaluation demonstrated stable difficulty (ranging from 0.92 to 0.98) and discrimination ratio (ranging from 0.37 to 0.49), except for minor exceptions of discrimination in 2019 (0.58) and 2020 (0.20). Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed no significant differences in average scores between 2016 (93.9 ± 4.6) and 2018 (94.5 ± 4.2), 2016 and 2019 (97.3 ± 3.9), 2017 (97.0 ± 5.6) and 2019, 2017 and 2020 (97.7 ± 4.7), as well as 2019 and 2020 exams (all p ≥ 0.05). In addition, candidates who responded to the survey preferred the simulation video model (with a 77.2% response rate), with 62.7% choosing it over the SP model for communication skills evaluation.The simulation video demonstrated a stable and better acceptable construct for assessing radiology residents' communication skills.CONCLUSIONThe simulation video demonstrated a stable and better acceptable construct for assessing radiology residents' communication skills.
Abstract Background Effective communication is a crucial component of radiology resident training, and many different aspects need to be explored when teaching and evaluating communication skills. To ensure that radiology residents’ communication skill levels can be measured accurately, a standardized evaluation tool has been introduced. In twenty hospitals in Beijing, simulation videos have been developed as a way to assess the communication skills of radiology residents during their certification exams, to minimize evaluating biases. This study aims to assess the performance of a simulation video model in evaluating communications skills compared to the standard patient model. Methods This is a retrospective observational study. The performance of standard patient and simulation video models was evaluated through an eight-year examination of communication skills in radiology residents. From 2014 to 2021, communications skill tests were administered to 1003 radiology residents in 20 hospitals in Beijing. The standardized patient (SP) model was applied in 2014, and simulation videos were used from 2015 to 2021. The difficulty and discrimination radio of the tests were evaluated. The subjective survey for candidates on two models of communication skills evaluation was performed and analyzed. Results The simulation video model evaluation demonstrated stable difficulty (ranging from 0.92 to 0.98) and discrimination ratio (ranging from 0.37 to 0.49), except for minor exceptions of discrimination in 2019 (0.58) and 2020 (0.20). Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed no significant differences in average scores between 2016 (93.9 ± 4.6) and 2018 (94.5 ± 4.2), 2016 and 2019 (97.3 ± 3.9), 2017 (97.0 ± 5.6) and 2019, 2017 and 2020 (97.7 ± 4.7), as well as 2019 and 2020 exams (all p ≥ 0.05). In addition, candidates who responded to the survey preferred the simulation video model (with a 77.2% response rate), with 62.7% choosing it over the SP model for communication skills evaluation. Conclusion The simulation video demonstrated a stable and better acceptable construct for assessing radiology residents’ communication skills.
Background Effective communication is a crucial component of radiology resident training, and many different aspects need to be explored when teaching and evaluating communication skills. To ensure that radiology residents' communication skill levels can be measured accurately, a standardized evaluation tool has been introduced. In twenty hospitals in Beijing, simulation videos have been developed as a way to assess the communication skills of radiology residents during their certification exams, to minimize evaluating biases. This study aims to assess the performance of a simulation video model in evaluating communications skills compared to the standard patient model. Methods This is a retrospective observational study. The performance of standard patient and simulation video models was evaluated through an eight-year examination of communication skills in radiology residents. From 2014 to 2021, communications skill tests were administered to 1003 radiology residents in 20 hospitals in Beijing. The standardized patient (SP) model was applied in 2014, and simulation videos were used from 2015 to 2021. The difficulty and discrimination radio of the tests were evaluated. The subjective survey for candidates on two models of communication skills evaluation was performed and analyzed. Results The simulation video model evaluation demonstrated stable difficulty (ranging from 0.92 to 0.98) and discrimination ratio (ranging from 0.37 to 0.49), except for minor exceptions of discrimination in 2019 (0.58) and 2020 (0.20). Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed no significant differences in average scores between 2016 (93.9 [+ or -] 4.6) and 2018 (94.5 [+ or -] 4.2), 2016 and 2019 (97.3 [+ or -] 3.9), 2017 (97.0 [+ or -] 5.6) and 2019, 2017 and 2020 (97.7 [+ or -] 4.7), as well as 2019 and 2020 exams (all p [greater than or equal to] 0.05). In addition, candidates who responded to the survey preferred the simulation video model (with a 77.2% response rate), with 62.7% choosing it over the SP model for communication skills evaluation. Conclusion The simulation video demonstrated a stable and better acceptable construct for assessing radiology residents' communication skills. Keywords: Communication skills, Radiology education, Evaluation model, Simulation video
ArticleNumber 586
Audience Academic
Author Jin, Zhengyu
Ding, Ning
Wang, Xuan
Zhang, Daming
Chen, Yu
Hu, Ge
Sun, Hao
Xue, Huadan
Song, Lan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ning
  surname: Ding
  fullname: Ding, Ning
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ge
  surname: Hu
  fullname: Hu, Ge
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Xuan
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Xuan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Hao
  surname: Sun
  fullname: Sun, Hao
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Lan
  surname: Song
  fullname: Song, Lan
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Yu
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Yu
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Daming
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Daming
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Huadan
  surname: Xue
  fullname: Xue, Huadan
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Zhengyu
  surname: Jin
  fullname: Jin, Zhengyu
BookMark eNp9kl1vFCEYhYmpsR_6B7yaxBtvpvLN4I1pGm2bNPGiek2AgZWVgQoz2_jvZXdrdBtjSIC8nPOQF84pOEo5OQBeI3iO0MDfVYQllD3EpIeUDbh_eAZOEBW45xLDo7_2x-C01jWESAwEvQDHRDDJGeMn4O4uTEvUc8ip24TR5fed7uacY5s6t9Fx0bPrbJ6mJQW709Wufg8x1i6krugx5JhXoc5dcbUB0lxfgudex-pePa5n4Ounj18ur_vbz1c3lxe3vWUUzT0SxI3EYY8w0UQjQgcqPKdeYyGgMQ5SSgxxiMJh9GikzFrjjMED5dIZSc7AzZ47Zr1W9yVMuvxUWQe1K-SyUrrMwUanNDdcbrtGhlDGfeNoRh0Rg6YQ-i3rw551v5jJjbb1UXQ8gB6epPBNrfJGIUiJ5JA0wttHQsk_FldnNYVqXYw6ubxUhQdGJEWciCZ980S6zktJ7a2aijMiKIbyj2qlWwch-dwutluouhAcUSYwRE11_g9VG6Obgm2B8aHVDwzD3mBLrrU4r2yYdx_bjCG2htQ2XWqfLtXSpXbpUg_Nip9Yf7_Pf0y_ANzG0lg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2024_04_024
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_024_05660_3
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13104_024_06779_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2024_111780
Cites_doi 10.1186/s12909-019-1917-z
10.1186/s12909-018-1342-8
10.1097/EJA.0000000000001139
10.1186/s13244-021-00970-2
10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.012
10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104476
10.3928/01484834-20080101-01
10.1007/s11096-017-0469-8
10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170792
10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01533.x
10.2214/AJR.14.12949
10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.04.002
10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07810-8
10.1097/00001888-199306000-00002
10.1080/01421590802530898
10.1148/radiol.2019182210
10.1080/10401334.2021.1915789
10.1007/s00330-018-5503-2
10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110464
10.1080/0142159021000000816
10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.036
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
– notice: BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
0-V
3V.
7X7
7XB
88B
88C
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
ALSLI
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
CJNVE
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
K9.
M0P
M0S
M0T
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEDU
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
Q9U
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12909-023-04582-w
DatabaseName CrossRef
ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Education Database (Alumni)
Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Social Science Premium Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials - QC
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One
Education Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Proquest Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Education Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Healthcare Administration Database
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Education
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Education
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Social Science Premium Collection
Education Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Education Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health Management
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Education Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1472-6920
EndPage 7
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_a6b6937591b3456fbeba54e378a400f9
PMC10439603
A761457201
10_1186_s12909_023_04582_w
GeographicLocations China
Beijing China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
– name: Beijing China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: ;
  grantid: 201920200102
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 201910600101
– fundername: ;
  grantid: Grant #20-385
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 2019zlgc0140
– fundername: ;
  grantid: No.2022-PUMCH-B-68
GroupedDBID ---
0-V
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIHN
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALSLI
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
AQUVI
ARALO
AZQEC
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CJNVE
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMOBN
F5P
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
IVC
KQ8
M0P
M0T
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQEDU
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SHS
SOJ
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
PMFND
3V.
7XB
8FK
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
Q9U
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-173ed3e2f123a3a134847f64fa2770bbe0443b3e1408df1d45ccbebb28469eb93
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1472-6920
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:11:18 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:40:25 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 20:24:42 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 00:25:28 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:19:13 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:19:31 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:14:25 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:25 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c541t-173ed3e2f123a3a134847f64fa2770bbe0443b3e1408df1d45ccbebb28469eb93
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12909-023-04582-w
PMID 37596556
PQID 2865374209
PQPubID 42593
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a6b6937591b3456fbeba54e378a400f9
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10439603
proquest_miscellaneous_2853941637
proquest_journals_2865374209
gale_infotracmisc_A761457201
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A761457201
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12909_023_04582_w
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12909_023_04582_w
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-08-18
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-08-18
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-08-18
  day: 18
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
PublicationTitle BMC medical education
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References AG Rockall (4582_CR3) 2022; 155
RN Uppot (4582_CR12) 2019; 291
KB Greenberg (4582_CR21) 2016; 59
CM DeBenedectis (4582_CR13) 2017; 14
T Schreckenbach (4582_CR17) 2018; 18
L Fallowfield (4582_CR23) 2002; 359
LK Daley (4582_CR22) 2008; 47
AS Gamble (4582_CR18) 2020; 91
HS Barrows (4582_CR5) 1993; 68
CS Chan (4582_CR16) 2003; 37
A Gutzeit (4582_CR4) 2019; 29
K Yin (4582_CR11) 2016; 38
C Sun (4582_CR14) 2020; 20
P Rubin (4582_CR1) 2002; 24
X Wu (4582_CR15) 2014; 8
DB Larson (4582_CR2) 2014; 203
HS Barrows (4582_CR6) 1964; 39
4582_CR19
W May (4582_CR9) 2009; 31
JM Berger-Estilita (4582_CR7) 2020; 37
SA Pawluk (4582_CR20) 2018; 10
B Paravattil (4582_CR8) 2017; 39
J Zhang (4582_CR10) 2021; 12
References_xml – volume: 20
  start-page: 8
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 4582_CR14
  publication-title: BMC Med Educ
  doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1917-z
– volume: 18
  start-page: 237
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 4582_CR17
  publication-title: BMC Med Educ
  doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1342-8
– volume: 37
  start-page: 387
  issue: 5
  year: 2020
  ident: 4582_CR7
  publication-title: Eur J Anaesthesiol
  doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001139
– volume: 12
  start-page: 25
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 4582_CR10
  publication-title: Insights Imaging
  doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-00970-2
– volume: 10
  start-page: 779
  issue: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: 4582_CR20
  publication-title: Curr Pharm Teach Learn
  doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.012
– volume: 91
  start-page: 104476
  year: 2020
  ident: 4582_CR18
  publication-title: Nurse Educ Today
  doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104476
– volume: 47
  start-page: 30
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 4582_CR22
  publication-title: J Nurs Educ
  doi: 10.3928/01484834-20080101-01
– volume: 8
  start-page: 883
  year: 2014
  ident: 4582_CR15
  publication-title: Patient Prefer Adherence
– volume: 39
  start-page: 759
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 4582_CR8
  publication-title: Int J Clin Pharm
  doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0469-8
– volume: 38
  start-page: 636
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  ident: 4582_CR11
  publication-title: Med Teach
  doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170792
– volume: 37
  start-page: 514
  issue: 6
  year: 2003
  ident: 4582_CR16
  publication-title: Med Educ
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01533.x
– volume: 203
  start-page: 957
  issue: 5
  year: 2014
  ident: 4582_CR2
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12949
– volume: 59
  start-page: 230
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 4582_CR21
  publication-title: J Adolesc Health
  doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.04.002
– volume: 359
  start-page: 650
  issue: 9307
  year: 2002
  ident: 4582_CR23
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07810-8
– volume: 68
  start-page: 443
  issue: 6
  year: 1993
  ident: 4582_CR5
  publication-title: Acad Med
  doi: 10.1097/00001888-199306000-00002
– volume: 39
  start-page: 802
  year: 1964
  ident: 4582_CR6
  publication-title: J Med Educ
– volume: 31
  start-page: 487
  issue: 6
  year: 2009
  ident: 4582_CR9
  publication-title: Med Teach
  doi: 10.1080/01421590802530898
– volume: 291
  start-page: 570
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  ident: 4582_CR12
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182210
– ident: 4582_CR19
  doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1915789
– volume: 29
  start-page: 224
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 4582_CR4
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5503-2
– volume: 155
  start-page: 110464
  year: 2022
  ident: 4582_CR3
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110464
– volume: 24
  start-page: 368
  issue: 4
  year: 2002
  ident: 4582_CR1
  publication-title: Med Teach
  doi: 10.1080/0142159021000000816
– volume: 14
  start-page: 87
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 4582_CR13
  publication-title: J Am Coll Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.036
SSID ssj0017831
Score 2.3464584
Snippet Background Effective communication is a crucial component of radiology resident training, and many different aspects need to be explored when teaching and...
Effective communication is a crucial component of radiology resident training, and many different aspects need to be explored when teaching and evaluating...
BackgroundEffective communication is a crucial component of radiology resident training, and many different aspects need to be explored when teaching and...
Abstract Background Effective communication is a crucial component of radiology resident training, and many different aspects need to be explored when teaching...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Aerospace Education
Armed Forces
Candidates
Communication Skills
Curricula
Data Analysis
Doctoral Degrees
Educational aspects
Educational Innovation
Evaluation model
Evaluators
Examiners
Hospitals
Measurement Techniques
Medical education
Medical imaging
Medical students
National Surveys
Patients
Radiology
Radiology education
Radiology, Medical
Simulated patients
Simulation
Simulation video
Skill Analysis
Skills
State Surveys
Statistical Significance
Training
Training Objectives
Verbal communication
Video Technology
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9UwEA-yB_EifmJ1XSIIHiRs-_JZb7visgjrZV3YW0jSBB8-W9l22X_fmTTv8aqgFy89NAkkk5n-Zpr8Zgh5K11SshOJ8biSEKB0jjlwCxjEbaoFB9ppjdzhiy_q_Ep8vpbXe6W-8E7YnB54FtyxU14BhMq28RzAPvnonRSRa-NA_VKm7gHmbYOpcn6gDW-2FBmjjkf829IywCeGB4MrdreAoZyt_89v8u_3JPeA5-wReVg8Rnoyz_QxuRf7J-T-RTkTf0ouL9c_Sg0uiqS64QN1dBqGDTxoSeYdadgngox0_L7ebEa67umN6zJjBbabQuiNNUan8Rm5Ovv09eM5K6USWJCimVijeexA3AmAyHHXcAGok5RIbqV17X2sheCeRwinTJeaTsgQQJIewEm10bf8OTnohz6-INRDWy24a-uuFs7JFixeJQiMTEghqboizVZyNpQ84ljOYmNzPGGUnaVtQdo2S9veVeT9bszPOYvGX3uf4obsemIG7PwC9MIWvbD_0ouKvMPttGinML3gCt0AFokZr-yJBsdEavB_KnK46An2FZbNW4Wwxb5Hi3xergVoXkXe7JpxJN5Z6-Nwi30kb9Hf1RUxC0VarGzZ0q-_5RzfDVKWVc1f_g9ZvCIPVln3DWvMITmYbm7ja_ClJn-UzeYX4JobkQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3daxQxEA9aQXwpfuLaKhEEHyR0c_na-CJVLEWoL7VwbyHJJnp47tbbK_33ndnLnV2FvuzDJmE385H5TZKZIeSN8lmrVmYm0kyBg9J65gEWMPDbtAUA7Y3B2OGzr_r0Qn6Zq3nZcBvKtcrtmjgu1G0fcY_8CCMoBfhxtf1w-Zth1Sg8XS0lNO6Se5i6DK90mfnO4eKmEXwbKNPoowH3XCwDK8XweHDGrifGaMzZ___K_O9tyRvm5-Qh2S-4kR5vGP2I3EndY3L_rJyMPyHn54tfpRIXxdC6_j31dN33S3jQktI70XgzHGSgw8_FcjnQRUdXvh3jVoDpFBxwrDS6Hp6Si5PP3z6dslIwgUUl-ZpxI1ILRM9gjrzwXEiwPVnL7GfG1CGkWkoRRAKnqmkzb6WKMaQQwERpm4IVz8he13fpOaEB2mopvK3bWnqvLOi9zuAeNTHHrOuK8C3lXCzZxLGoxdKNXkWj3YbaDqjtRmq764q824253OTSuLX3R2TIrifmwR5f9KvvrqiV8zpoAFjK8iAACmaYjVcyCdN4WJyyrchbZKdDbYXfi74EHcAkMe-VOzYAT5QBFFSRw0lP0LI4bd4KhCtaPri_MlmR17tmHIk317rUX2EfJSyiXlORZiJIk5lNW7rFjzHTN8fAZV2LF7d__YA8mI1S3TDeHJK99eoqvQSstA6vRoX4A3mPE1Y
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Simulation video: a tool to evaluate communications skills in radiologist residents
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2865374209
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2853941637
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10439603
https://doaj.org/article/a6b6937591b3456fbeba54e378a400f9
Volume 23
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3di9QwEA_3AeLL4SdWzyWC4INE2-arFURu5Y5D2EPuXFh8CUmbnIu1Pbc9Tv97J9l2veohvvSh-Wgzmcn8JsnMIPScayd4yRyhNuVgoJSaaIAFBOw2kQOA1lJ63-HZiTiesw8LvthCQ7qjnoDtjaadzyc1X1Wvfnz_-Q4E_m0Q-Ey8bv1eSk5A-xB_7JeSq220C5pJekGdsd-nCjIL-QkTJlMi8jQenGhu7GOkqEI8_79X7T9vUl5TTUd30F6PKfHBmgnuoi1b30O3Zv2p-X10drb81mfpwt7trnmDNe6apoIH7sN9W1xcdxVpcft1WVUtXtZ4pcvg0wIMgcE491lIu_YBmh8dfnp_TPpkCqTgLOlIIqktYUIcqCpNdUIZ6CUnmNOplLExNmaMGmrB4MpKl5SMF4WxxoD6Erk1OX2Iduqmto8QNlAWM6rzuIyZ1jyHNUE4MJ2ywhVOxBFKBsqpoo807hNeVCpYHJlQa2oroLYK1FZXEXq5aXOxjrPxz9pTPyGbmj5GdnjRrM5VL3JKCyMAfPE8MRRgooPRaM4slZmGhcvlEXrhp1N53oLfK3TvkACD9DGx1IEE6MIlIKQI7Y9qggQW4-KBIdTAwMp7_FLJ0hi-82xT7Fv6W221bS59HU5zj4hlhLIRI41GNi6pl19CFPDEOzWLmD7-j-6foNtpYO2MJNk-2ulWl_YpgKnOTNC2XMgJ2p0ennw8nYQtiUmQGnieTj__Agq0Hy0
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqrQRcEE8RWsBIIA7IahI_kiAh1EKrLe2uEG2l3lw7sWHVJSmbrVb8KX4jM9lkaUDqrZccYkeJxzOf54s9M4S8ksYrWQjPuIslEJTCMANuAQPepjJwoE2SYOzwaKyGJ-LzqTxdI7-7WBg8VtlhYgPURZXjP_ItjKDkwOPC7MPFT4ZVo3B3tSuhsVSLA_drAZStfr__Ceb3dRzv7R5_HLK2qgDLpYjmLEq4K-DLPGC24SbiAgDaK-FNnCShtS4UglvugHmkhY8KIfPcOmsBx1XmLCZfAshfFxyozICs7-yOv3xd7VskKY-60JxUbdX4lydjsC4y3JCM2aK3_DVVAv5fC_49n3llwdu7R-62nirdXqrWfbLmygfk1qjdi39Ijo4mP9raXxSD-ap31NB5VU3hQtsk4o7mVwNQalqfT6bTmk5KOjNFEykDakaB8mNt03n9iJzciDAfk0FZle4JoRbaQsFNFhahMEZmgDTKAyFLc597FQYk6iSn8zZ_OZbRmOqGx6RKL6WtQdq6kbZeBOTt6pmLZfaOa3vv4ISsemLm7eZGNfumW0PWRlkFLp3MIsvB-fQwGiOF40lqAA59FpA3OJ0a8QE-LzdtmAMMEjNt6e0EHCKZgN8VkM1eT7DrvN_cKYRucaXWf60gIC9XzfgknpUrXXWJfSTP0M9OApL2FKk3sn5LOfne5BaPMFRahfzp9W9_QW4Pj0eH-nB_fLBB7sSNhqcsSjfJYD67dM_AU5vb5615UHJ20xb5B1jZUZE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulation+video%3A+a+tool+to+evaluate+communications+skills+in+radiologist+residents&rft.jtitle=BMC+medical+education&rft.au=Ding%2C+Ning&rft.au=Hu%2C+Ge&rft.au=Wang%2C+Xuan&rft.au=Sun%2C+Hao&rft.date=2023-08-18&rft.issn=1472-6920&rft.eissn=1472-6920&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12909-023-04582-w&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6920&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6920&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6920&client=summon