Association between poor self-reported health and unmarried status among adults: examining the hypothesis of marriage protection and marriage selection in the Indian context

Background The link between marital status and health differences has long been a topic of debate. The substantial research on marriage and health has been conducted under two important hypotheses: marital protection and marriage selection. While the majority of evidence on the marriage-health relat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC public health Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
Main Authors Hossain, Babul, James, K. S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central Ltd 22.09.2022
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1471-2458
1471-2458
DOI10.1186/s12889-022-14170-0

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background The link between marital status and health differences has long been a topic of debate. The substantial research on marriage and health has been conducted under two important hypotheses: marital protection and marriage selection. While the majority of evidence on the marriage-health relationship using these hypotheses comes from developed countries, there is a lack of evidence from Asia, particularly from India. Objectives The current study examines theoretical frameworks of marriage i.e., marital protection and marriage selection in the Indian setting concurrently, bringing substantial empirical evidence to explore the link between marriage and health, considering this subject in the context of self-reported health (SRH). Secondly, this study will aid in investigating age and gender differences in marriage and health. Methods Using the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE), a cohort study of individuals aged 50 years and older with a small section of individuals aged 18 to 49 for comparative reasons, the present study population was 25 years and above individuals with complete marital information. Logistic regressions were employed to explore the connection between marital status and self-reported health. In the marriage protection hypothesis, the follow-up poor SRH was the dependent variable, whereas the initial unmarried status was the independent variable. For the marriage selection effects, initial poor SRH as the independent variable and follow-up unmarried status as the dependent variable had considered. Results Examining the marital protection hypothesis, the initial unmarried status (OR: 2.14; CI at 95%: 1.17, 3.92) was associated with the followed-up SRH transition from good to poor between 2007 and 2015 for young men, while initial unmarried status was linked with a lower likelihood of stable good SRH and a higher likelihood of stable poor SRH status across all age categories among women. Focusing on the marriage selection hypothesis, among young men, a significant association exists between the initial poor SRH and departure in marital status from married to unmarried. Young women with initial poor SRH (OR: 0.68; CI at 95%: 0.40, 1.00) had lower odds of stable married. In comparison, women with initially poor SRH, irrespective of age, were more likely to have higher odds of being stably unmarried. Conclusion Marriage indeed protects health. There are also shreds of evidence on health-selected marital status in India. Taken together, the aspect of marital protection or marriage selection is gender and age-specific in India. The findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between marriage and health, which may have significant implications for health-related public policies aimed at unmarried women. Keywords: Marriage protection, Marriage selection, Unmarried women, SAGE, India
AbstractList The link between marital status and health differences has long been a topic of debate. The substantial research on marriage and health has been conducted under two important hypotheses: marital protection and marriage selection. While the majority of evidence on the marriage-health relationship using these hypotheses comes from developed countries, there is a lack of evidence from Asia, particularly from India. The current study examines theoretical frameworks of marriage i.e., marital protection and marriage selection in the Indian setting concurrently, bringing substantial empirical evidence to explore the link between marriage and health, considering this subject in the context of self-reported health (SRH). Secondly, this study will aid in investigating age and gender differences in marriage and health. Using the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE), a cohort study of individuals aged 50 years and older with a small section of individuals aged 18 to 49 for comparative reasons, the present study population was 25 years and above individuals with complete marital information. Logistic regressions were employed to explore the connection between marital status and self-reported health. In the marriage protection hypothesis, the follow-up poor SRH was the dependent variable, whereas the initial unmarried status was the independent variable. For the marriage selection effects, initial poor SRH as the independent variable and follow-up unmarried status as the dependent variable had considered. Examining the marital protection hypothesis, the initial unmarried status (OR: 2.14; CI at 95%: 1.17, 3.92) was associated with the followed-up SRH transition from good to poor between 2007 and 2015 for young men, while initial unmarried status was linked with a lower likelihood of stable good SRH and a higher likelihood of stable poor SRH status across all age categories among women. Focusing on the marriage selection hypothesis, among young men, a significant association exists between the initial poor SRH and departure in marital status from married to unmarried. Young women with initial poor SRH (OR: 0.68; CI at 95%: 0.40, 1.00) had lower odds of stable married. In comparison, women with initially poor SRH, irrespective of age, were more likely to have higher odds of being stably unmarried. Marriage indeed protects health. There are also shreds of evidence on health-selected marital status in India. Taken together, the aspect of marital protection or marriage selection is gender and age-specific in India. The findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between marriage and health, which may have significant implications for health-related public policies aimed at unmarried women.
Background The link between marital status and health differences has long been a topic of debate. The substantial research on marriage and health has been conducted under two important hypotheses: marital protection and marriage selection. While the majority of evidence on the marriage-health relationship using these hypotheses comes from developed countries, there is a lack of evidence from Asia, particularly from India. Objectives The current study examines theoretical frameworks of marriage i.e., marital protection and marriage selection in the Indian setting concurrently, bringing substantial empirical evidence to explore the link between marriage and health, considering this subject in the context of self-reported health (SRH). Secondly, this study will aid in investigating age and gender differences in marriage and health. Methods Using the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE), a cohort study of individuals aged 50 years and older with a small section of individuals aged 18 to 49 for comparative reasons, the present study population was 25 years and above individuals with complete marital information. Logistic regressions were employed to explore the connection between marital status and self-reported health. In the marriage protection hypothesis, the follow-up poor SRH was the dependent variable, whereas the initial unmarried status was the independent variable. For the marriage selection effects, initial poor SRH as the independent variable and follow-up unmarried status as the dependent variable had considered. Results Examining the marital protection hypothesis, the initial unmarried status (OR: 2.14; CI at 95%: 1.17, 3.92) was associated with the followed-up SRH transition from good to poor between 2007 and 2015 for young men, while initial unmarried status was linked with a lower likelihood of stable good SRH and a higher likelihood of stable poor SRH status across all age categories among women. Focusing on the marriage selection hypothesis, among young men, a significant association exists between the initial poor SRH and departure in marital status from married to unmarried. Young women with initial poor SRH (OR: 0.68; CI at 95%: 0.40, 1.00) had lower odds of stable married. In comparison, women with initially poor SRH, irrespective of age, were more likely to have higher odds of being stably unmarried. Conclusion Marriage indeed protects health. There are also shreds of evidence on health-selected marital status in India. Taken together, the aspect of marital protection or marriage selection is gender and age-specific in India. The findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between marriage and health, which may have significant implications for health-related public policies aimed at unmarried women. Keywords: Marriage protection, Marriage selection, Unmarried women, SAGE, India
Background The link between marital status and health differences has long been a topic of debate. The substantial research on marriage and health has been conducted under two important hypotheses: marital protection and marriage selection. While the majority of evidence on the marriage-health relationship using these hypotheses comes from developed countries, there is a lack of evidence from Asia, particularly from India. Objectives The current study examines theoretical frameworks of marriage i.e., marital protection and marriage selection in the Indian setting concurrently, bringing substantial empirical evidence to explore the link between marriage and health, considering this subject in the context of self-reported health (SRH). Secondly, this study will aid in investigating age and gender differences in marriage and health. Methods Using the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE), a cohort study of individuals aged 50 years and older with a small section of individuals aged 18 to 49 for comparative reasons, the present study population was 25 years and above individuals with complete marital information. Logistic regressions were employed to explore the connection between marital status and self-reported health. In the marriage protection hypothesis, the follow-up poor SRH was the dependent variable, whereas the initial unmarried status was the independent variable. For the marriage selection effects, initial poor SRH as the independent variable and follow-up unmarried status as the dependent variable had considered. Results Examining the marital protection hypothesis, the initial unmarried status (OR: 2.14; CI at 95%: 1.17, 3.92) was associated with the followed-up SRH transition from good to poor between 2007 and 2015 for young men, while initial unmarried status was linked with a lower likelihood of stable good SRH and a higher likelihood of stable poor SRH status across all age categories among women. Focusing on the marriage selection hypothesis, among young men, a significant association exists between the initial poor SRH and departure in marital status from married to unmarried. Young women with initial poor SRH (OR: 0.68; CI at 95%: 0.40, 1.00) had lower odds of stable married. In comparison, women with initially poor SRH, irrespective of age, were more likely to have higher odds of being stably unmarried. Conclusion Marriage indeed protects health. There are also shreds of evidence on health-selected marital status in India. Taken together, the aspect of marital protection or marriage selection is gender and age-specific in India. The findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between marriage and health, which may have significant implications for health-related public policies aimed at unmarried women.
The link between marital status and health differences has long been a topic of debate. The substantial research on marriage and health has been conducted under two important hypotheses: marital protection and marriage selection. While the majority of evidence on the marriage-health relationship using these hypotheses comes from developed countries, there is a lack of evidence from Asia, particularly from India.BACKGROUNDThe link between marital status and health differences has long been a topic of debate. The substantial research on marriage and health has been conducted under two important hypotheses: marital protection and marriage selection. While the majority of evidence on the marriage-health relationship using these hypotheses comes from developed countries, there is a lack of evidence from Asia, particularly from India.The current study examines theoretical frameworks of marriage i.e., marital protection and marriage selection in the Indian setting concurrently, bringing substantial empirical evidence to explore the link between marriage and health, considering this subject in the context of self-reported health (SRH). Secondly, this study will aid in investigating age and gender differences in marriage and health.OBJECTIVESThe current study examines theoretical frameworks of marriage i.e., marital protection and marriage selection in the Indian setting concurrently, bringing substantial empirical evidence to explore the link between marriage and health, considering this subject in the context of self-reported health (SRH). Secondly, this study will aid in investigating age and gender differences in marriage and health.Using the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE), a cohort study of individuals aged 50 years and older with a small section of individuals aged 18 to 49 for comparative reasons, the present study population was 25 years and above individuals with complete marital information. Logistic regressions were employed to explore the connection between marital status and self-reported health. In the marriage protection hypothesis, the follow-up poor SRH was the dependent variable, whereas the initial unmarried status was the independent variable. For the marriage selection effects, initial poor SRH as the independent variable and follow-up unmarried status as the dependent variable had considered.METHODSUsing the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE), a cohort study of individuals aged 50 years and older with a small section of individuals aged 18 to 49 for comparative reasons, the present study population was 25 years and above individuals with complete marital information. Logistic regressions were employed to explore the connection between marital status and self-reported health. In the marriage protection hypothesis, the follow-up poor SRH was the dependent variable, whereas the initial unmarried status was the independent variable. For the marriage selection effects, initial poor SRH as the independent variable and follow-up unmarried status as the dependent variable had considered.Examining the marital protection hypothesis, the initial unmarried status (OR: 2.14; CI at 95%: 1.17, 3.92) was associated with the followed-up SRH transition from good to poor between 2007 and 2015 for young men, while initial unmarried status was linked with a lower likelihood of stable good SRH and a higher likelihood of stable poor SRH status across all age categories among women. Focusing on the marriage selection hypothesis, among young men, a significant association exists between the initial poor SRH and departure in marital status from married to unmarried. Young women with initial poor SRH (OR: 0.68; CI at 95%: 0.40, 1.00) had lower odds of stable married. In comparison, women with initially poor SRH, irrespective of age, were more likely to have higher odds of being stably unmarried.RESULTSExamining the marital protection hypothesis, the initial unmarried status (OR: 2.14; CI at 95%: 1.17, 3.92) was associated with the followed-up SRH transition from good to poor between 2007 and 2015 for young men, while initial unmarried status was linked with a lower likelihood of stable good SRH and a higher likelihood of stable poor SRH status across all age categories among women. Focusing on the marriage selection hypothesis, among young men, a significant association exists between the initial poor SRH and departure in marital status from married to unmarried. Young women with initial poor SRH (OR: 0.68; CI at 95%: 0.40, 1.00) had lower odds of stable married. In comparison, women with initially poor SRH, irrespective of age, were more likely to have higher odds of being stably unmarried.Marriage indeed protects health. There are also shreds of evidence on health-selected marital status in India. Taken together, the aspect of marital protection or marriage selection is gender and age-specific in India. The findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between marriage and health, which may have significant implications for health-related public policies aimed at unmarried women.CONCLUSIONMarriage indeed protects health. There are also shreds of evidence on health-selected marital status in India. Taken together, the aspect of marital protection or marriage selection is gender and age-specific in India. The findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between marriage and health, which may have significant implications for health-related public policies aimed at unmarried women.
Abstract Background The link between marital status and health differences has long been a topic of debate. The substantial research on marriage and health has been conducted under two important hypotheses: marital protection and marriage selection. While the majority of evidence on the marriage-health relationship using these hypotheses comes from developed countries, there is a lack of evidence from Asia, particularly from India. Objectives The current study examines theoretical frameworks of marriage i.e., marital protection and marriage selection in the Indian setting concurrently, bringing substantial empirical evidence to explore the link between marriage and health, considering this subject in the context of self-reported health (SRH). Secondly, this study will aid in investigating age and gender differences in marriage and health. Methods Using the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE), a cohort study of individuals aged 50 years and older with a small section of individuals aged 18 to 49 for comparative reasons, the present study population was 25 years and above individuals with complete marital information. Logistic regressions were employed to explore the connection between marital status and self-reported health. In the marriage protection hypothesis, the follow-up poor SRH was the dependent variable, whereas the initial unmarried status was the independent variable. For the marriage selection effects, initial poor SRH as the independent variable and follow-up unmarried status as the dependent variable had considered. Results Examining the marital protection hypothesis, the initial unmarried status (OR: 2.14; CI at 95%: 1.17, 3.92) was associated with the followed-up SRH transition from good to poor between 2007 and 2015 for young men, while initial unmarried status was linked with a lower likelihood of stable good SRH and a higher likelihood of stable poor SRH status across all age categories among women. Focusing on the marriage selection hypothesis, among young men, a significant association exists between the initial poor SRH and departure in marital status from married to unmarried. Young women with initial poor SRH (OR: 0.68; CI at 95%: 0.40, 1.00) had lower odds of stable married. In comparison, women with initially poor SRH, irrespective of age, were more likely to have higher odds of being stably unmarried. Conclusion Marriage indeed protects health. There are also shreds of evidence on health-selected marital status in India. Taken together, the aspect of marital protection or marriage selection is gender and age-specific in India. The findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between marriage and health, which may have significant implications for health-related public policies aimed at unmarried women.
ArticleNumber 1797
Audience Academic
Author James, K. S.
Hossain, Babul
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Babul
  surname: Hossain
  fullname: Hossain, Babul
– sequence: 2
  givenname: K. S.
  surname: James
  fullname: James, K. S.
BookMark eNp9ksFu1DAURSNUJNrCD7CyxIZNiu0kjsMCaVQVGKkSG1hbL87LjEeJHWwH2o_iH_FkpoWpEMrC0c2959nOvcjOrLOYZa8ZvWJMineBcSmbnHKes5LVNKfPsnNW1iznZSXP_np_kV2EsKOU1bLi59mvVQhOG4jGWdJi_IloyeScJwGHPvc4OR-xI1uEIW4J2I7MdgTvTRJDhDgHAqOzGwLdPMTwnuAdjMaapMQtku395NIaTCCuJ0sQNkgm7yLqZege-ainoUfZ2CW_tp0BS7SzEe_iy-x5D0PAV8f1Mvv28ebr9ef89sun9fXqNtdVSWOOCKKkDHXRNoAF1MCrSrRdR6WomqZtJTIGtMWG1U3VMwHAoehRiAKQFWVxma0P3M7BTk3epA3eKwdGLYLzGwU-Gj2gkgVFSUXftpqWTdm1rCo0CIFa0yJRE-vDgTXN7YidRhs9DCfQ0y_WbNXG_VBNwsliD3h7BHj3fcYQ1WiCxmEAi24OitesFrIqmzpZ3zyx7tzsbbqq5OKCpWYU9I9rA-kAxvYuzdV7qFrVrOElE4wn19U_XOnpcDTpf2Bvkn4SkIeA9i4Ej73SJi7FSkEzKEbVvqvq0FWVuqqWrqr9jviT6MP1_Cf0G_Yf8kU
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2174_0118746098297063240409070531
crossref_primary_10_1002_pchj_666
crossref_primary_10_3390_clinpract15030041
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13054_024_05160_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_022_14569_9
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2023_1271595
crossref_primary_10_1089_tmj_2024_0196
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_17887_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_024_04975_6
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_19787_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina60111893
crossref_primary_10_26453_otjhs_1297589
Cites_doi 10.1007/s10834-013-9371-2
10.1007/s11150-018-9406-4
10.1186/s12889-016-3682-9
10.1007/s11113-020-09593-9
10.1007/s13524-018-0671-x
10.1007/s00737-002-0148-0
10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.611
10.1016/0277-9536(94)00281-W
10.2307/585665
10.1016/0277-9536(95)00347-9
10.1007/s12199-012-0274-x
10.2105/AJPH.86.8_Pt_1.1087
10.1353/dem.2000.0010
10.1037/hea0000049
10.1177/002214650804900301
10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.035
10.1177/0022146513484766
10.2307/2061837
10.1080/13811110600791205
10.1080/08952841.2021.2011562
10.1177/0022146515596354
10.1080/02692171.2011.587109
10.1007/s13524-011-0032-5
10.1177/0192513X14538029
10.1186/1741-7015-12-42
10.1080/00220388.2015.1066497
10.1080/00223980.1977.9915853
10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00420.x
10.1093/ije/dym214
10.1080/00324720701524466
10.1023/A:1023079219538
10.1136/jech.2005.037606
10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0
10.1177/0022146512470564
10.1093/pubmed/fdt044
10.1016/j.soscij.2017.08.001
10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.08.007
10.1093/geront/38.5.618
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.04.001
10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00546-4
10.2307/2061451
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.011
10.1093/eurpub/ckr065
10.1080/01494929.2013.879555
10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112428
10.1186/s12888-021-03587-3
10.1038/s41598-020-61603-0
10.1177/0192513X16680090
10.1016/j.tcm.2019.05.012
10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.038
10.9790/0837-191172730
10.1186/1471-2458-13-320
10.1207/s15327019eb0101_6
10.1080/15313204.2010.523650
10.1007/s10433-014-0320-1
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.
2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2022. The Author(s).
The Author(s) 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2022. The Author(s).
– notice: The Author(s) 2022
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7T2
7X7
7XB
88E
8C1
8FE
8FG
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABJCF
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AN0
ATCPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
COVID
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
L6V
M0S
M1P
M7S
PATMY
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PTHSS
PYCSY
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12889-022-14170-0
DatabaseName CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Public Health Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
British Nursing Database
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
Engineering Database
Environmental Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Collection
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Acceso a contenido Full Text - Doaj
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
Health & Safety Science Abstracts
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Engineering Collection
Engineering Database
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
British Nursing Index with Full Text
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
EISSN 1471-2458
EndPage 10
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_830e806fbbc0494db153ca66ecc032a3
PMC9494833
A719241612
10_1186_s12889_022_14170_0
GeographicLocations India
China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: India
– name: China
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
2XV
44B
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
7XC
88E
8C1
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
A8Z
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABJCF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AN0
AOIJS
ATCPS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BMC
BNQBC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
L6V
M1P
M48
M7S
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PATMY
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PTHSS
PYCSY
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
PMFND
3V.
7T2
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
C1K
COVID
DWQXO
GNUQQ
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-eea6401ec3b9ae3a7a2556bdd086599bb8e11a0be91795f16aa2a3fe663ae1343
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1471-2458
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:30:46 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:39:49 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 01:56:13 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 10:15:58 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:33:59 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:13:40 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:12:04 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:56:38 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c540t-eea6401ec3b9ae3a7a2556bdd086599bb8e11a0be91795f16aa2a3fe663ae1343
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/830e806fbbc0494db153ca66ecc032a3
PQID 2726117030
PQPubID 44782
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_830e806fbbc0494db153ca66ecc032a3
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9494833
proquest_miscellaneous_2717685497
proquest_journals_2726117030
gale_infotracmisc_A719241612
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A719241612
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12889_022_14170_0
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_022_14170_0
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-09-22
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-09-22
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-09-22
  day: 22
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
PublicationTitle BMC public health
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References M Murphy (14170_CR29) 2007; 61
J Bookwala (14170_CR15) 2014; 33
S Sudha (14170_CR39) 2007
Y Hu (14170_CR22) 1990; 27
J Robards (14170_CR11) 2012; 73
A Shastri (14170_CR48) 2014; 19
BS Schone (14170_CR10) 1998; 38
AA Marphatia (14170_CR46) 2017; 5
14170_CR52
FH Jhang (14170_CR42) 2018; 55
G Lorem (14170_CR32) 2020; 10
H Liu (14170_CR4) 2008; 49
GW Jones (14170_CR40) 2014; 35
P Cutright (14170_CR26) 2006; 10
J Espinosa (14170_CR24) 2008; 27
S Leikin (14170_CR56) 1991; 1
L Artazcoz (14170_CR27) 2011; 72
Z Wu (14170_CR57) 2002; 64
14170_CR9
JL Kohn (14170_CR31) 2014; 35
R Fu (14170_CR38) 2018; 16
P Lloyd-Sherlock (14170_CR54) 2015; 51
N Goldman (14170_CR1) 1993; 30
14170_CR8
TJ Iwashyna (14170_CR62) 2003; 57
B Hossain (14170_CR18) 2021; 21
L Strohschein (14170_CR58) 2017; 38
M Mori (14170_CR60) 2002; 5
14170_CR63
P Martikainen (14170_CR14) 1996; 86
S Floud (14170_CR12) 2014; 12
DS Dhindsa (14170_CR16) 2020; 30
IMA Joung (14170_CR55) 2007; 41
D Jasilionis (14170_CR28) 2012; 22
P Kowal (14170_CR44) 2010; 3
JM Raymo (14170_CR41) 2015; 41
H Zheng (14170_CR7) 2013; 54
MS Rendall (14170_CR6) 2011; 48
J Caputo (14170_CR17) 2013; 54
N Goldman (14170_CR2) 1995; 40
14170_CR36
M Sengupta (14170_CR51) 2002; 17
14170_CR37
RSI Sreerupa (14170_CR50) 2010; 19
FI Gunasekara (14170_CR34) 2012; 74
P Chowdhry (14170_CR47) 1997; 32
I Waldron (14170_CR3) 1996; 43
GL Gerber (14170_CR59) 1977; 95
C Yamada (14170_CR35) 2012; 17
B Hossain (14170_CR20) 2021; 00
Y Zheng (14170_CR45) 2014; 36
M Hagedoorn (14170_CR5) 2006; 21
I Chakraborty (14170_CR49) 2020; 9
GS Goda (14170_CR19) 2013; 32
MK Pandey (14170_CR21) 2012; 26
JE Murray (14170_CR23) 2000; 37
14170_CR43
Z Qian (14170_CR25) 2018; 55
M Chen (14170_CR53) 2016
JB Dowd (14170_CR33) 2007; 36
RM Kaplan (14170_CR13) 2006; 60
K Larsson (14170_CR61) 2014; 11
KL Hanson (14170_CR30) 2014; 50
References_xml – volume: 35
  start-page: 295
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  ident: 14170_CR31
  publication-title: J Fam Econ Issues
  doi: 10.1007/s10834-013-9371-2
– ident: 14170_CR52
– volume: 3
  start-page: 11
  issue: SUPPL. 2
  year: 2010
  ident: 14170_CR44
  publication-title: Glob Health Action
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1003
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 14170_CR38
  publication-title: Rev Econ Househ
  doi: 10.1007/s11150-018-9406-4
– ident: 14170_CR43
  doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3682-9
– ident: 14170_CR37
  doi: 10.1007/s11113-020-09593-9
– volume: 55
  start-page: 849
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  ident: 14170_CR25
  publication-title: Demography.
  doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0671-x
– start-page: 43
  volume-title: Widows and health in rural North India
  year: 2016
  ident: 14170_CR53
– volume: 5
  start-page: 161
  issue: 4
  year: 2002
  ident: 14170_CR60
  publication-title: Arch Womens Ment Health
  doi: 10.1007/s00737-002-0148-0
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1019
  issue: 19
  year: 1997
  ident: 14170_CR47
  publication-title: Econ Polit Wkly
– volume: 21
  start-page: 611
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  ident: 14170_CR5
  publication-title: Psychol Aging
  doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.611
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1717
  issue: 12
  year: 1995
  ident: 14170_CR2
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
  doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00281-W
– ident: 14170_CR9
  doi: 10.2307/585665
– volume: 43
  start-page: 113
  issue: 1
  year: 1996
  ident: 14170_CR3
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
  doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00347-9
– volume: 17
  start-page: 457
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  ident: 14170_CR35
  publication-title: Environ Health Prev Med
  doi: 10.1007/s12199-012-0274-x
– volume: 86
  start-page: 1087
  issue: 8 I
  year: 1996
  ident: 14170_CR14
  publication-title: Am J Public Health
  doi: 10.2105/AJPH.86.8_Pt_1.1087
– volume: 37
  start-page: 511
  issue: 4
  year: 2000
  ident: 14170_CR23
  publication-title: Demography.
  doi: 10.1353/dem.2000.0010
– volume: 33
  start-page: 505
  issue: 6
  year: 2014
  ident: 14170_CR15
  publication-title: Health Psychol
  doi: 10.1037/hea0000049
– volume: 49
  start-page: 239
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  ident: 14170_CR4
  publication-title: J Health Soc Behav
  doi: 10.1177/002214650804900301
– volume: 72
  start-page: 600
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  ident: 14170_CR27
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.035
– volume: 54
  start-page: 240
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  ident: 14170_CR17
  publication-title: J Health Soc Behav
  doi: 10.1177/0022146513484766
– volume: 30
  start-page: 189
  issue: 2
  year: 1993
  ident: 14170_CR1
  publication-title: Demography.
  doi: 10.2307/2061837
– volume: 10
  start-page: 365
  issue: 4
  year: 2006
  ident: 14170_CR26
  publication-title: Arch Suicide Res
  doi: 10.1080/13811110600791205
– volume: 00
  start-page: 1
  issue: 00
  year: 2021
  ident: 14170_CR20
  publication-title: J Women Aging
  doi: 10.1080/08952841.2021.2011562
– ident: 14170_CR63
  doi: 10.1177/0022146515596354
– volume: 26
  start-page: 111
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 14170_CR21
  publication-title: Int Rev Appl Econ
  doi: 10.1080/02692171.2011.587109
– volume: 48
  start-page: 481
  issue: 2
  year: 2011
  ident: 14170_CR6
  publication-title: Demography.
  doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0032-5
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1567
  issue: 12
  year: 2014
  ident: 14170_CR40
  publication-title: J Fam Issues
  doi: 10.1177/0192513X14538029
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 14170_CR12
  publication-title: BMC Med
  doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-42
– volume: 51
  start-page: 1374
  issue: 10
  year: 2015
  ident: 14170_CR54
  publication-title: J Dev Stud
  doi: 10.1080/00220388.2015.1066497
– volume: 95
  start-page: 9
  issue: 1
  year: 1977
  ident: 14170_CR59
  publication-title: J Psychol Interdiscip Appl
  doi: 10.1080/00223980.1977.9915853
– volume: 64
  start-page: 420
  issue: 2
  year: 2002
  ident: 14170_CR57
  publication-title: J Marriage Fam
  doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00420.x
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1214
  issue: 6
  year: 2007
  ident: 14170_CR33
  publication-title: Int J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1093/ije/dym214
– volume: 61
  start-page: 287
  issue: 3
  year: 2007
  ident: 14170_CR29
  publication-title: Popul Stud (NY)
  doi: 10.1080/00324720701524466
– volume: 17
  start-page: 313
  issue: 4
  year: 2002
  ident: 14170_CR51
  publication-title: J Cross Cult Gerontol
  doi: 10.1023/A:1023079219538
– volume: 60
  start-page: 760
  issue: 9
  year: 2006
  ident: 14170_CR13
  publication-title: J Epidemiol Community Health
  doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.037606
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1708
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 14170_CR49
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0
– volume: 54
  start-page: 128
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 14170_CR7
  publication-title: J Health Soc Behav
  doi: 10.1177/0022146512470564
– volume: 36
  start-page: 104
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 14170_CR45
  publication-title: J Public Heal (United Kingdom)
  doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt044
– volume: 55
  start-page: 87
  issue: 2
  year: 2018
  ident: 14170_CR42
  publication-title: Soc Sci J
  doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2017.08.001
– volume: 5
  start-page: 1
  issue: October
  year: 2017
  ident: 14170_CR46
  publication-title: Front Public Health
– volume: 41
  start-page: 653
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  ident: 14170_CR55
  publication-title: Encycl Stress
– volume: 73
  start-page: 295
  issue: 4
  year: 2012
  ident: 14170_CR11
  publication-title: Maturitas.
  doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.08.007
– volume: 38
  start-page: 618
  issue: 5
  year: 1998
  ident: 14170_CR10
  publication-title: Gerontologist.
  doi: 10.1093/geront/38.5.618
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1326
  issue: 5
  year: 2008
  ident: 14170_CR24
  publication-title: J Health Econ
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.04.001
– volume: 57
  start-page: 2137
  issue: 11
  year: 2003
  ident: 14170_CR62
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
  doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00546-4
– volume: 27
  start-page: 233
  issue: 2
  year: 1990
  ident: 14170_CR22
  publication-title: Demography.
  doi: 10.2307/2061451
– volume: 32
  start-page: 647
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: 14170_CR19
  publication-title: J Health Econ
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.011
– volume: 22
  start-page: 602
  issue: 4
  year: 2012
  ident: 14170_CR28
  publication-title: Eur J Pub Health
  doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr065
– volume: 50
  start-page: 373
  issue: 5
  year: 2014
  ident: 14170_CR30
  publication-title: Marriage Fam Rev
  doi: 10.1080/01494929.2013.879555
– ident: 14170_CR8
– volume: 41
  start-page: 471
  year: 2015
  ident: 14170_CR41
  publication-title: Annu Rev Sociol
  doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112428
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 14170_CR18
  publication-title: BMC Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03587-3
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 14170_CR32
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61603-0
– volume: 38
  start-page: 1899
  issue: 13
  year: 2017
  ident: 14170_CR58
  publication-title: J Fam Issues
  doi: 10.1177/0192513X16680090
– volume: 30
  start-page: 215
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  ident: 14170_CR16
  publication-title: Trends Cardiovasc Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.05.012
– volume: 74
  start-page: 1117
  issue: 7
  year: 2012
  ident: 14170_CR34
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.038
– volume: 19
  start-page: 27
  issue: 11
  year: 2014
  ident: 14170_CR48
  publication-title: IOSR J Humanit Soc Sci
  doi: 10.9790/0837-191172730
– start-page: 103
  volume-title: Marital status, family ties , and self-rated health among elders in South India
  year: 2007
  ident: 14170_CR39
– ident: 14170_CR36
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-320
– volume: 1
  start-page: 63
  issue: 1
  year: 1991
  ident: 14170_CR56
  publication-title: Ethics Behav
  doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0101_6
– volume: 19
  start-page: 287
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  ident: 14170_CR50
  publication-title: J Ethn Cult Divers Soc Work
  doi: 10.1080/15313204.2010.523650
– volume: 11
  start-page: 349
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 14170_CR61
  publication-title: Eur J Ageing
  doi: 10.1007/s10433-014-0320-1
SSID ssj0017852
Score 2.4252627
Snippet Background The link between marital status and health differences has long been a topic of debate. The substantial research on marriage and health has been...
The link between marital status and health differences has long been a topic of debate. The substantial research on marriage and health has been conducted...
Abstract Background The link between marital status and health differences has long been a topic of debate. The substantial research on marriage and health has...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Adults
Age
Aging
Context
Dependent variables
Developed countries
Divorce
Gender
Gender aspects
Gender differences
Health aspects
Hypotheses
Independent variables
India
Industrialized nations
Marital status
Marriage
Marriage protection
Marriage selection
Men
Mortality
Population studies
Public policy
Response rates
SAGE
Self report
Sex differences
Single women
Social aspects
Source studies
Unmarried women
Women
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Public Health Database
  dbid: 8C1
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9RAEF-0vggifmK0ygiCDxKaTXL58EVqsVRBnyz0bdmPWXvQJtfLHegf5f_ozGYvNgp9C_uR3N7MzsfuzG-EeEMatkFTurRk4FaSfnmqW5vRE3osS5Te8Tnk12_VyWn55WxxFg_chhhWuZOJQVC73vIZ-UFek60vmT8_rK5SrhrFt6uxhMZtcUeSDGbs_OZoCvHgwvP5LlGmqQ4GksUcIETulyxDwZWZMgqY_f9L5n-jJa-pn-MH4n60G-FwJPRDcQu7R-LeeOgGYy7RY_H72p8NMQILVn2_hgEvfDreD6CDMfkRdOdg213qNbnLDji1aDtAqD4EAZZjeA_4U1-GEhJAhiKc_1pxwtawHKD3ECaSOIKI9cAf5VdO7UOoscPNyy7M_9wxNwKHx5NOeCJOjz99PzpJYz2G1JJdt0kRdUXuGNrCtBoLXWvGLzPOkVu0aFtjGpRSZwbJBWwXXlZa57rwSEaNRlmUxVOx1_UdPhPgPOYLnyPxRVuWmisea1svvMuQ7I_GJ0LuCKNsBCvnmhkXKjgtTaVGYioipgrEVFki3k1zViNUx42jPzK9p5EMsx0a-vUPFXetaooMm6zyxljG0XGG9IPVVUV8nxW0tkS8ZW5RLAzo51kdcxpokQyrpQ5r9m_JqM4TsT8bSZvYzrt3_KaiEBnUX5ZPxOupm2dyYFyH_ZbHSHIYycmvE1HP-HS2snlPtzwPQOItYwMVxfObP_5C3M15z_BVXL4v9jbrLb4kS2xjXoXt9gf86zbJ
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9QwEA_n-SKI-InVUyIIPki1TdMvQeQUj1PQJxfuLSTNxFvYS9d2F-7-KP9HZ9J2verhk28lyew2mZlkppn5DWPP8YStwEgbSwJuxd1PxLpuEnwCB1JC6ix9h_zytTheyM8n-ckem8odjQvYX-naUT2pRbd6df7j4h0q_Nug8FXxusc9lgJ_0K1KZSikco1dF_REoXzy961CWeViSpy5km52OAUM_7936j-jJy8dR0e32a3RjuSHA-PvsD3wd9nN4SMcH3KL7rGflxafjxFZfN22He9h5eLhvgAsH5IhufaWb_2Z7tB9tpxSjbY9D9WIeIDp6N9wONdnoaQER8ORn16sKYGrX_a8dTwQ4vbER-wH-lP6yV17H2ruUPPSB_pPnqSTU7g8nhH32eLo47cPx_FYnyFu0M7bxAC6QPcMmszUGjJdasIzM9aim5TXtTEVpKlODKBLWOcuLbQWOnOARo6GNJPZA7bvWw8PGbcORO4EoJzUUmqqgKybMnc2AbRHKhexdGKMakbwcqqhsVLBiakKNTBTITNVYKZKIvZyR7MeoDv-Ofo98Xs3kmC3Q0PbfVejFqsqS6BKCmdMQ7g61uB50eiiQD1IMpxbxF6QtCgSV3y9Ro85DjhJgtlShyX5u2hki4gdzEaiUjfz7kne1KQTSpTo7qa0RUfs2a6bKClQzkO7pTEpOpDo9JcRK2dyOpvZvMcvTwOweE1YQVn26H8sxWN2Q5Bm0QWeOGD7m24LT9B-25inQSl_AfGbR3Y
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Association between poor self-reported health and unmarried status among adults: examining the hypothesis of marriage protection and marriage selection in the Indian context
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2726117030
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2717685497
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9494833
https://doaj.org/article/830e806fbbc0494db153ca66ecc032a3
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9QwEA96vggifmL1XCIIPki5pk3b1Lfb49ZTuEMODxZfQtJMuIW7dtnugv5R_o_OpN1lq6AvvoSSj35kJpOZZuY3jL3FHVaBlS6WBNyK0i-NTVUneAUepAThHf2HPL8ozq7k53k-30v1RT5hPTxwP3FHKktAJYW3tiYoE2dxidamKPDRSZaagPOJe97WmBrOD0qVp9sQGVUcdSiFyTUIDS8hQ6qV0TYU0Pr_lMm_-0nubTyzR-zhoDHy4_5NH7M70DxhD_rfbbyPInrKfu5NMx98r_iybVe8gxsf9ycD4Hgf9shN4_imuTUrNJQdp6CiTcdD3iEeADm6Dxy-m9uQPIKjisivfywpVKtbdLz1PAxEQcQHlAd6KN1yV9-F7DpUvWjC-E8N8SEnx3jcDZ6xq9np15OzeMjEENeo0a1jAFOgIQZ1ZisDmSkNIZdZ59AgyqvKWgVCmMQCGn9V7kVhDJLGA6ozBkQms-fsoGkbeMG485DmPgXkiEpKQ7mOTV3m3iWAmofyERNbwuh6gCmnbBk3OpgrqtA9MTUSUwdi6iRi73djlj1Ix197T4neu54EsB0qkO30wHb6X2wXsXfELZrEAL5ebYZoBvxIAtTSxyVZtqhOpxE7HPXE5VuPm7f8pgfx0em0RMNWkDCO2JtdM40kl7gG2g31EWgqonlfRqwc8enoy8YtzeI6QIhXhAqUZS__x1S8YvdTWll0VJcesoP1agOvUVNb2wm7W85LLNWJoHL2ccLuTU8vvlxOwnLF8lwqLC-n334BwRlGEQ
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Zb9QwELZKeQAJIU41UMBIIB5Q1MR2LiSESqHapcdTK_XNOMmYrtQmy2ZX0B8Fv5EZ56ABqW99i3wksWY8hz3zDWOvUMOmkKvSVwTcitJP-CYrAnwCC0pBaEs6hzw4jCfH6stJdLLGfve5MBRW2ctEJ6jLuqAz8i2RoK0fEn9-mH_3qWoU3a72JTRattiDix_osjXvp5-Qvq-F2P18tDPxu6oCfoHWydIHMDE6FVDIPDMgTWIIhSsvSzTuoyzL8xTC0AQ5oCOTRTaMjRFGWkDVbCCUSuJ7b7CbSsqEsPrTnSGkhArdiz4xJ423GpT9FJCE7l6oXIGXkfJzNQL-1wT_RmdeUne799jdzk7l2y1j3WdrUD1gd9pDPt7mLj1kvy4Rl3cRX3xe1wvewJn12_sIKHmbbMlNVfJVdW4W6J6XnFKZVg131Y64gwFp3nH4ac5dyQqOhik_vZhTglgza3htuZuI4o932BL0UXrl0N64mj7UPKvc_GlF3M8pHB910CN2fC2UeszWq7qCDcZLCyKyApAPM6UMVVg2RRLZMgC0d1LrsbAnjC46cHSq0XGmnZOUxrolpkZiakdMHXjs7TBn3kKDXDn6I9F7GEmw3q6hXnzTnZTQqQwgDWKb5wXh9pQ56qPCxDHus0Di2jz2hrhFk_DB3ytMl0OBiyQYL72dkD-NRrzw2OZoJAqNYtzd85vuhFaj_24xj70cumkmBeJVUK9oTIgOaqSyxGPJiE9HKxv3VLNTB1yeERaRlE-u_vgLdmtydLCv96eHe0_ZbUH7h64BxSZbXy5W8AytwGX-3G09zr5e917_A1mvdHk
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association+between+poor+self-reported+health+and+unmarried+status+among+adults%3A+examining+the+hypothesis+of+marriage+protection+and+marriage+selection+in+the+Indian+context&rft.jtitle=BMC+public+health&rft.au=Babul+Hossain&rft.au=K.+S.+James&rft.date=2022-09-22&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12889-022-14170-0&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_830e806fbbc0494db153ca66ecc032a3
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2458&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2458&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2458&client=summon