A constricted opening in Kir channels does not impede potassium conduction

The canonical mechanistic model explaining potassium channel gating is of a conformational change that alternately dilates and constricts a collar-like intracellular entrance to the pore. It is based on the premise that K + ions maintain a complete hydration shell while passing between the transmemb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature communications Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 3024 - 13
Main Authors Black, Katrina A., He, Sitong, Jin, Ruitao, Miller, David M., Bolla, Jani R., Clarke, Oliver B., Johnson, Paul, Windley, Monique, Burns, Christopher J., Hill, Adam P., Laver, Derek, Robinson, Carol V., Smith, Brian J., Gulbis, Jacqueline M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 15.06.2020
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The canonical mechanistic model explaining potassium channel gating is of a conformational change that alternately dilates and constricts a collar-like intracellular entrance to the pore. It is based on the premise that K + ions maintain a complete hydration shell while passing between the transmembrane cavity and cytosol, which must be accommodated. To put the canonical model to the test, we locked the conformation of a Kir K + channel to prevent widening of the narrow collar. Unexpectedly, conduction was unimpaired in the locked channels. In parallel, we employed all-atom molecular dynamics to simulate K + ions moving along the conduction pathway between the lower cavity and cytosol. During simulations, the constriction did not significantly widen. Instead, transient loss of some water molecules facilitated K + permeation through the collar. The low free energy barrier to partial dehydration in the absence of conformational change indicates Kir channels are not gated by the canonical mechanism. The transition between conducting and non-conducting states of K + channels has been explained by conformational changes at the intracellular entrance to the conduction pathway. Here authors demonstrate that control over K + currents in Kir channels is not explained by the canonical pore-gating model, as conduction is not impaired by a constricted inner helix bundle.
ISSN:2041-1723
2041-1723
DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-16842-0