The gut microbiota composition in patients with right- and left-sided colorectal cancer and after curative colectomy, as analyzed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing
Background Gut pathological microbial imbalance or dysbiosis is closely associated with colorectal cancer. Although there are observable differences in molecular and clinical characteristics between patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer, differences in their gut microbiomes have not been...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC gastroenterology Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 1 - 13 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central Ltd
25.06.2022
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1471-230X 1471-230X |
DOI | 10.1186/s12876-022-02382-y |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background Gut pathological microbial imbalance or dysbiosis is closely associated with colorectal cancer. Although there are observable differences in molecular and clinical characteristics between patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer, differences in their gut microbiomes have not been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, subsequent changes in microbiota status after partial colectomy remain unknown. We examined the human gut microbiota composition to determine its relationship with colon cancer and partial colon resection according to location. Methods Stool samples from forty-one subjects (10 in the control group, 10 in the right-sided colon cancer [RCC] group, 6 in the sigmoid colon cancer [SCC] group, 9 in the right colon resection [RCR] group and 6 in the sigmoid colon resection [SCR] group) were collected, and DNA was extracted. After terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis, the samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and the metabolic function of the microbiota was predicted using PICRUSt2. Results T-RFLP analysis showed a reduced ratio of clostridial cluster XIVa in the SCC patients and clostridial cluster IX in the RCC patients, although these changes were not evident in the RCR or SCR patients. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing demonstrated that the diversity of the gut microbiota in the RCC group was higher than that in the control group, and the diversity in the SCR group was significantly higher than that in the RCR group. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed significant differences according to the group. Analyses of the microbiota revealed that Firmicutes was significantly dominant in the RCC group and that the SCC group had a higher abundance of Verrucomicrobia. At the genus level, linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) revealed several bacteria, such as Ruminococcaceae, Streptococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Gemellaceae, and Desulfovibrio, in the RCC group and several oral microbiomes in the SCC group. Metabolic function prediction revealed that cholesterol transport- and metabolism-related enzymes were specifically upregulated in the RCC group and that cobalamin metabolism-related enzymes were downregulated in the SCC group. Conclusion Gut microbial properties differ between RCC and SCC patients and between right hemicolectomy and sigmoidectomy patients and may contribute to clinical manifestations. Keywords: Colon cancer, Microbiota, T-RFLP, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background Gut pathological microbial imbalance or dysbiosis is closely associated with colorectal cancer. Although there are observable differences in molecular and clinical characteristics between patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer, differences in their gut microbiomes have not been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, subsequent changes in microbiota status after partial colectomy remain unknown. We examined the human gut microbiota composition to determine its relationship with colon cancer and partial colon resection according to location. Methods Stool samples from forty-one subjects (10 in the control group, 10 in the right-sided colon cancer [RCC] group, 6 in the sigmoid colon cancer [SCC] group, 9 in the right colon resection [RCR] group and 6 in the sigmoid colon resection [SCR] group) were collected, and DNA was extracted. After terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis, the samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and the metabolic function of the microbiota was predicted using PICRUSt2. Results T-RFLP analysis showed a reduced ratio of clostridial cluster XIVa in the SCC patients and clostridial cluster IX in the RCC patients, although these changes were not evident in the RCR or SCR patients. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing demonstrated that the diversity of the gut microbiota in the RCC group was higher than that in the control group, and the diversity in the SCR group was significantly higher than that in the RCR group. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed significant differences according to the group. Analyses of the microbiota revealed that Firmicutes was significantly dominant in the RCC group and that the SCC group had a higher abundance of Verrucomicrobia. At the genus level, linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) revealed several bacteria, such as Ruminococcaceae, Streptococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Gemellaceae, and Desulfovibrio, in the RCC group and several oral microbiomes in the SCC group. Metabolic function prediction revealed that cholesterol transport- and metabolism-related enzymes were specifically upregulated in the RCC group and that cobalamin metabolism-related enzymes were downregulated in the SCC group. Conclusion Gut microbial properties differ between RCC and SCC patients and between right hemicolectomy and sigmoidectomy patients and may contribute to clinical manifestations. Gut pathological microbial imbalance or dysbiosis is closely associated with colorectal cancer. Although there are observable differences in molecular and clinical characteristics between patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer, differences in their gut microbiomes have not been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, subsequent changes in microbiota status after partial colectomy remain unknown. We examined the human gut microbiota composition to determine its relationship with colon cancer and partial colon resection according to location. Stool samples from forty-one subjects (10 in the control group, 10 in the right-sided colon cancer [RCC] group, 6 in the sigmoid colon cancer [SCC] group, 9 in the right colon resection [RCR] group and 6 in the sigmoid colon resection [SCR] group) were collected, and DNA was extracted. After terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis, the samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and the metabolic function of the microbiota was predicted using PICRUSt2. T-RFLP analysis showed a reduced ratio of clostridial cluster XIVa in the SCC patients and clostridial cluster IX in the RCC patients, although these changes were not evident in the RCR or SCR patients. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing demonstrated that the diversity of the gut microbiota in the RCC group was higher than that in the control group, and the diversity in the SCR group was significantly higher than that in the RCR group. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed significant differences according to the group. Analyses of the microbiota revealed that Firmicutes was significantly dominant in the RCC group and that the SCC group had a higher abundance of Verrucomicrobia. At the genus level, linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) revealed several bacteria, such as Ruminococcaceae, Streptococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Gemellaceae, and Desulfovibrio, in the RCC group and several oral microbiomes in the SCC group. Metabolic function prediction revealed that cholesterol transport- and metabolism-related enzymes were specifically upregulated in the RCC group and that cobalamin metabolism-related enzymes were downregulated in the SCC group. Gut microbial properties differ between RCC and SCC patients and between right hemicolectomy and sigmoidectomy patients and may contribute to clinical manifestations. Background Gut pathological microbial imbalance or dysbiosis is closely associated with colorectal cancer. Although there are observable differences in molecular and clinical characteristics between patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer, differences in their gut microbiomes have not been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, subsequent changes in microbiota status after partial colectomy remain unknown. We examined the human gut microbiota composition to determine its relationship with colon cancer and partial colon resection according to location. Methods Stool samples from forty-one subjects (10 in the control group, 10 in the right-sided colon cancer [RCC] group, 6 in the sigmoid colon cancer [SCC] group, 9 in the right colon resection [RCR] group and 6 in the sigmoid colon resection [SCR] group) were collected, and DNA was extracted. After terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis, the samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and the metabolic function of the microbiota was predicted using PICRUSt2. Results T-RFLP analysis showed a reduced ratio of clostridial cluster XIVa in the SCC patients and clostridial cluster IX in the RCC patients, although these changes were not evident in the RCR or SCR patients. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing demonstrated that the diversity of the gut microbiota in the RCC group was higher than that in the control group, and the diversity in the SCR group was significantly higher than that in the RCR group. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed significant differences according to the group. Analyses of the microbiota revealed that Firmicutes was significantly dominant in the RCC group and that the SCC group had a higher abundance of Verrucomicrobia. At the genus level, linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) revealed several bacteria, such as Ruminococcaceae, Streptococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Gemellaceae, and Desulfovibrio, in the RCC group and several oral microbiomes in the SCC group. Metabolic function prediction revealed that cholesterol transport- and metabolism-related enzymes were specifically upregulated in the RCC group and that cobalamin metabolism-related enzymes were downregulated in the SCC group. Conclusion Gut microbial properties differ between RCC and SCC patients and between right hemicolectomy and sigmoidectomy patients and may contribute to clinical manifestations. Keywords: Colon cancer, Microbiota, T-RFLP, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing Gut pathological microbial imbalance or dysbiosis is closely associated with colorectal cancer. Although there are observable differences in molecular and clinical characteristics between patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer, differences in their gut microbiomes have not been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, subsequent changes in microbiota status after partial colectomy remain unknown. We examined the human gut microbiota composition to determine its relationship with colon cancer and partial colon resection according to location.BACKGROUNDGut pathological microbial imbalance or dysbiosis is closely associated with colorectal cancer. Although there are observable differences in molecular and clinical characteristics between patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer, differences in their gut microbiomes have not been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, subsequent changes in microbiota status after partial colectomy remain unknown. We examined the human gut microbiota composition to determine its relationship with colon cancer and partial colon resection according to location.Stool samples from forty-one subjects (10 in the control group, 10 in the right-sided colon cancer [RCC] group, 6 in the sigmoid colon cancer [SCC] group, 9 in the right colon resection [RCR] group and 6 in the sigmoid colon resection [SCR] group) were collected, and DNA was extracted. After terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis, the samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and the metabolic function of the microbiota was predicted using PICRUSt2.METHODSStool samples from forty-one subjects (10 in the control group, 10 in the right-sided colon cancer [RCC] group, 6 in the sigmoid colon cancer [SCC] group, 9 in the right colon resection [RCR] group and 6 in the sigmoid colon resection [SCR] group) were collected, and DNA was extracted. After terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis, the samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and the metabolic function of the microbiota was predicted using PICRUSt2.T-RFLP analysis showed a reduced ratio of clostridial cluster XIVa in the SCC patients and clostridial cluster IX in the RCC patients, although these changes were not evident in the RCR or SCR patients. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing demonstrated that the diversity of the gut microbiota in the RCC group was higher than that in the control group, and the diversity in the SCR group was significantly higher than that in the RCR group. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed significant differences according to the group. Analyses of the microbiota revealed that Firmicutes was significantly dominant in the RCC group and that the SCC group had a higher abundance of Verrucomicrobia. At the genus level, linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) revealed several bacteria, such as Ruminococcaceae, Streptococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Gemellaceae, and Desulfovibrio, in the RCC group and several oral microbiomes in the SCC group. Metabolic function prediction revealed that cholesterol transport- and metabolism-related enzymes were specifically upregulated in the RCC group and that cobalamin metabolism-related enzymes were downregulated in the SCC group.RESULTST-RFLP analysis showed a reduced ratio of clostridial cluster XIVa in the SCC patients and clostridial cluster IX in the RCC patients, although these changes were not evident in the RCR or SCR patients. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing demonstrated that the diversity of the gut microbiota in the RCC group was higher than that in the control group, and the diversity in the SCR group was significantly higher than that in the RCR group. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed significant differences according to the group. Analyses of the microbiota revealed that Firmicutes was significantly dominant in the RCC group and that the SCC group had a higher abundance of Verrucomicrobia. At the genus level, linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) revealed several bacteria, such as Ruminococcaceae, Streptococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Gemellaceae, and Desulfovibrio, in the RCC group and several oral microbiomes in the SCC group. Metabolic function prediction revealed that cholesterol transport- and metabolism-related enzymes were specifically upregulated in the RCC group and that cobalamin metabolism-related enzymes were downregulated in the SCC group.Gut microbial properties differ between RCC and SCC patients and between right hemicolectomy and sigmoidectomy patients and may contribute to clinical manifestations.CONCLUSIONGut microbial properties differ between RCC and SCC patients and between right hemicolectomy and sigmoidectomy patients and may contribute to clinical manifestations. Abstract Background Gut pathological microbial imbalance or dysbiosis is closely associated with colorectal cancer. Although there are observable differences in molecular and clinical characteristics between patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer, differences in their gut microbiomes have not been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, subsequent changes in microbiota status after partial colectomy remain unknown. We examined the human gut microbiota composition to determine its relationship with colon cancer and partial colon resection according to location. Methods Stool samples from forty-one subjects (10 in the control group, 10 in the right-sided colon cancer [RCC] group, 6 in the sigmoid colon cancer [SCC] group, 9 in the right colon resection [RCR] group and 6 in the sigmoid colon resection [SCR] group) were collected, and DNA was extracted. After terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis, the samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and the metabolic function of the microbiota was predicted using PICRUSt2. Results T-RFLP analysis showed a reduced ratio of clostridial cluster XIVa in the SCC patients and clostridial cluster IX in the RCC patients, although these changes were not evident in the RCR or SCR patients. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing demonstrated that the diversity of the gut microbiota in the RCC group was higher than that in the control group, and the diversity in the SCR group was significantly higher than that in the RCR group. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed significant differences according to the group. Analyses of the microbiota revealed that Firmicutes was significantly dominant in the RCC group and that the SCC group had a higher abundance of Verrucomicrobia. At the genus level, linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) revealed several bacteria, such as Ruminococcaceae, Streptococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, Gemellaceae, and Desulfovibrio, in the RCC group and several oral microbiomes in the SCC group. Metabolic function prediction revealed that cholesterol transport- and metabolism-related enzymes were specifically upregulated in the RCC group and that cobalamin metabolism-related enzymes were downregulated in the SCC group. Conclusion Gut microbial properties differ between RCC and SCC patients and between right hemicolectomy and sigmoidectomy patients and may contribute to clinical manifestations. |
ArticleNumber | 313 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Mizutani, Hiroki Nakazawa, Yuuichi Moritani, Isao Dohi, Kaoru Shiraki, Katsuya Inoue, Hidekazu Suga, Daisuke Fukui, Shunsuke Shimada, Yasuaki Yamanaka, Yutaka Nishiura, Yuuki Takaba, Kei Kobayashi, Mayu Kawasaki, Yuuya Nakagawa, Hayato Ojima, Eiki Wada, Hideo Mohri, Yasuhiko |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Daisuke surname: Suga fullname: Suga, Daisuke – sequence: 2 givenname: Hiroki surname: Mizutani fullname: Mizutani, Hiroki – sequence: 3 givenname: Shunsuke surname: Fukui fullname: Fukui, Shunsuke – sequence: 4 givenname: Mayu surname: Kobayashi fullname: Kobayashi, Mayu – sequence: 5 givenname: Yasuaki surname: Shimada fullname: Shimada, Yasuaki – sequence: 6 givenname: Yuuichi surname: Nakazawa fullname: Nakazawa, Yuuichi – sequence: 7 givenname: Yuuki surname: Nishiura fullname: Nishiura, Yuuki – sequence: 8 givenname: Yuuya surname: Kawasaki fullname: Kawasaki, Yuuya – sequence: 9 givenname: Isao surname: Moritani fullname: Moritani, Isao – sequence: 10 givenname: Yutaka surname: Yamanaka fullname: Yamanaka, Yutaka – sequence: 11 givenname: Hidekazu surname: Inoue fullname: Inoue, Hidekazu – sequence: 12 givenname: Eiki surname: Ojima fullname: Ojima, Eiki – sequence: 13 givenname: Yasuhiko surname: Mohri fullname: Mohri, Yasuhiko – sequence: 14 givenname: Hayato surname: Nakagawa fullname: Nakagawa, Hayato – sequence: 15 givenname: Kaoru surname: Dohi fullname: Dohi, Kaoru – sequence: 16 givenname: Kei surname: Takaba fullname: Takaba, Kei – sequence: 17 givenname: Hideo surname: Wada fullname: Wada, Hideo – sequence: 18 givenname: Katsuya surname: Shiraki fullname: Shiraki, Katsuya |
BookMark | eNp9UltrFDEYHaRiL_oHfAr44oNTc51kXoRSqhaKglbwLWQymdmUmWRNspX1B_k7_Wa3oi0iIReSc86XnJzj6iDE4KrqOcGnhKjmdSZUyabGlEJnitbbR9UR4ZLUlOGvB3-tD6vjnG8wJlJR9qQ6ZEIKKht-VP28Xjk0bgqavU2x87EYZOO8jtkXHwPyAa1N8S6UjL77skLJj6tSIxN6NLmh1Nn3rgfKFJOzxUzImmBd2gHMUGBlNwkUbt0CAkict6-QyQAw0_YHcLstIs1nlD59OEOjCw6ZeT15C8Wz-7ZxwfowPq0eD2bK7tndfFJ9eXtxff6-vvr47vL87Kq2guNSM8kE5oxSRwfrWua4VLgjigsisBiU4bQnvRC4MwzTFgYh8dDKtuWMU9Wzk-pyr9tHc6PXyc8mbXU0Xu82Yhq1ScXbyWnheuOwaHAvOi5U1yolwV-JWT-QlmDQerPXWm-62fUWPExmuid6_yT4lR7jrW4pY7IRIPDyTiBFMCIXPfts3TSZ4OIma9ooKNMIvkBfPIDexE0ChxdUSzi8ntM_qNHAA3wYItS1i6g-k1hBmqRc7n36DxS03s3Lt7jBw_49gtoTIEE5Jzdo64tZ4gNEP2mC9ZJXvc-rhrzqXV71Fqj0AfW3Pf8h_QLYge2w |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1039_D4FO06350C crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms25179463 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_023_02778_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10238_023_01165_3 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2024_1282932 crossref_primary_10_3389_fgstr_2022_1021050 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina58111598 crossref_primary_10_3393_ac_2024_00346_0049 crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2023_1037406 |
Cites_doi | 10.3892/or.2015.4398 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008702 10.1371/journal.pone.0105592 10.1159/000477890 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108645 10.1016/j.tim.2020.01.001 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309595 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000465 10.12938/bmfh.2020-054 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.07.007 10.7554/eLife.37420 10.1186/s12876-015-0330-2 10.1128/AEM.69.2.1251-1262.2003 10.1007/s00430-018-0542-5 10.3390/microorganisms9051108 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.048 10.1128/AEM.00759-10 10.1371/journal.pone.0009085 10.1038/s41591-019-0405-7 10.12938/bifidus.25.99 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01514.x 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.03.037 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30952-5 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00979 10.1186/s12885-019-5644-y 10.4161/gmic.1.3.12360 10.1002/ijc.23299 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 10.1038/ismej.2012.158 10.1038/s41522-017-0040-3 10.1038/nrmicro2819 10.1093/jnci/djt300 10.12659/MSM.904220 10.1093/jn/132.5.1012 10.14740/gr1062w 10.1159/000510944 10.1002/ijc.30168 10.1371/journal.pone.0218436 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.165 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300865 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2022. The Author(s). The Author(s) 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2022. The Author(s). – notice: The Author(s) 2022 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7QP 7QR 7T5 7X7 7XB 88E 8FD 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. M0S M1P P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12876-022-02382-y |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Immunology Abstracts Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1471-230X |
EndPage | 13 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_5edae0560d5b458b9887178703df1910 PMC9233765 A708287770 10_1186_s12876_022_02382_y |
GeographicLocations | Japan United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Japan – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB PMFND 3V. 7QP 7QR 7T5 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC DWQXO FR3 H94 K9. P64 PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-373504322e2fce93e4780b18451505f8a42d1d550ba3029a30570f979943428d3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1471-230X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:11:31 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:07:19 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 09:48:27 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 09:16:59 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:54:43 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:08:45 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:12:08 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:29 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c540t-373504322e2fce93e4780b18451505f8a42d1d550ba3029a30570f979943428d3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/5edae0560d5b458b9887178703df1910 |
PMID | 35752764 |
PQID | 2691450542 |
PQPubID | 44673 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5edae0560d5b458b9887178703df1910 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9233765 proquest_miscellaneous_2681036545 proquest_journals_2691450542 gale_infotracmisc_A708287770 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A708287770 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12876_022_02382_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_022_02382_y |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-06-25 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-06-25 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2022 text: 2022-06-25 day: 25 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC gastroenterology |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | S Zhang (2382_CR17) 2021; 172 I Allali (2382_CR36) 2018; 207 P Van den Abbeele (2382_CR29) 2013; 7 H Nakagawa-Senda (2382_CR39) 2019; 19 M Yamauchi (2382_CR9) 2012; 61 JL Drewes (2382_CR37) 2017; 3 N Larsen (2382_CR19) 2010; 5 P Louis (2382_CR18) 2009; 294 JG Caporaso (2382_CR24) 2010; 7 N Segata (2382_CR27) 2011; 12 K Nagashima (2382_CR21) 2003; 69 C Kasai (2382_CR7) 2016; 35 Y Ye (2382_CR26) 2009; 5 G De Renzi (2382_CR11) 2021; 99 P Van den Abbeele (2382_CR28) 2010; 76 B Baran (2382_CR10) 2018; 11 SJ O'Keefe (2382_CR2) 2016; 13 M Song (2382_CR3) 2020; 158 AB Jensen (2382_CR15) 2015; 5 SA Broitman (2382_CR42) 1993; 17 M Oya (2382_CR30) 2021; 40 AM Thomas (2382_CR40) 2019; 25 S Ussar (2382_CR16) 2015; 22 Q Sheng (2382_CR8) 2019; 18 XH Lin (2382_CR20) 2019; 14 K Nagashima (2382_CR22) 2006; 25 C Kasai (2382_CR25) 2015; 15 O Phipps (2382_CR13) 2021; 9 XJ Shen (2382_CR6) 2010; 1 C Wang (2382_CR41) 2017; 42 D Ternes (2382_CR4) 2020; 28 B Flemer (2382_CR12) 2017; 66 H Tjalsma (2382_CR1) 2012; 10 JL McQuade (2382_CR35) 2019; 20 AM Dahlin (2382_CR43) 2008; 122 J Yu (2382_CR38) 2016; 139 F Wang (2382_CR5) 2021 K Xu (2382_CR33) 2017; 23 AB Jensen (2382_CR14) 2018; 7 J Ahn (2382_CR34) 2013; 105 S Takahashi (2382_CR23) 2014; 9 A Rivière (2382_CR31) 2016; 7 BF Hinnebusch (2382_CR32) 2002; 132 |
References_xml | – volume: 35 start-page: 325 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 2382_CR7 publication-title: Oncol Rep doi: 10.3892/or.2015.4398 – volume: 5 issue: 12 year: 2015 ident: 2382_CR15 publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008702 – volume: 9 issue: 8 year: 2014 ident: 2382_CR23 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105592 – volume: 42 start-page: 729 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 2382_CR41 publication-title: Cell Physiol Biochem doi: 10.1159/000477890 – volume: 172 year: 2021 ident: 2382_CR17 publication-title: Diabetes Res Clin Pract doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108645 – volume: 28 start-page: 401 issue: 5 year: 2020 ident: 2382_CR4 publication-title: Trends Microbiol doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.01.001 – volume: 66 start-page: 633 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 2382_CR12 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309595 – volume: 17 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 1993 ident: 2382_CR42 publication-title: Prog Food Nutr Sci – volume: 5 issue: 8 year: 2009 ident: 2382_CR26 publication-title: PLoS Comput Biol doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000465 – volume: 40 start-page: 168 issue: 4 year: 2021 ident: 2382_CR30 publication-title: Biosci Microbiota Food Health doi: 10.12938/bmfh.2020-054 – volume: 22 start-page: 516 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 2382_CR16 publication-title: Cell Metab doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.07.007 – volume: 7 year: 2018 ident: 2382_CR14 publication-title: Elife doi: 10.7554/eLife.37420 – volume: 15 start-page: 100 year: 2015 ident: 2382_CR25 publication-title: BMC Gastroenterol doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0330-2 – volume: 69 start-page: 1251 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 2382_CR21 publication-title: Appl Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.2.1251-1262.2003 – volume: 207 start-page: 211 issue: 3–4 year: 2018 ident: 2382_CR36 publication-title: Med Microbiol Immunol doi: 10.1007/s00430-018-0542-5 – volume: 9 start-page: 1108 issue: 5 year: 2021 ident: 2382_CR13 publication-title: Microorganisms doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9051108 – volume: 158 start-page: 322 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 2382_CR3 publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.048 – volume: 76 start-page: 5237 issue: 15 year: 2010 ident: 2382_CR28 publication-title: Appl Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1128/AEM.00759-10 – volume: 5 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 2382_CR19 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009085 – volume: 25 start-page: 667 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 2382_CR40 publication-title: Nat Med doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0405-7 – volume: 25 start-page: 99 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: 2382_CR22 publication-title: Biosci Microflora doi: 10.12938/bifidus.25.99 – volume: 294 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 2382_CR18 publication-title: FEMS Microbiol Lett doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01514.x – volume: 12 start-page: R60 issue: 6 year: 2011 ident: 2382_CR27 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 – year: 2021 ident: 2382_CR5 publication-title: Semin Cancer Biol doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.03.037 – volume: 20 start-page: e77 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 2382_CR35 publication-title: Lancet Oncol doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30952-5 – volume: 7 start-page: 979 year: 2016 ident: 2382_CR31 publication-title: Front Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00979 – volume: 18 start-page: 4834 issue: 5 year: 2019 ident: 2382_CR8 publication-title: Oncol Lett – volume: 19 start-page: 431 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 2382_CR39 publication-title: BMC Cancer doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5644-y – volume: 1 start-page: 138 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: 2382_CR6 publication-title: Gut Microbes doi: 10.4161/gmic.1.3.12360 – volume: 122 start-page: 2057 issue: 9 year: 2008 ident: 2382_CR43 publication-title: Int J Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.23299 – volume: 7 start-page: 335 issue: 5 year: 2010 ident: 2382_CR24 publication-title: Nat Methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 – volume: 7 start-page: 949 issue: 5 year: 2013 ident: 2382_CR29 publication-title: ISME J doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.158 – volume: 3 start-page: 34 year: 2017 ident: 2382_CR37 publication-title: NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes doi: 10.1038/s41522-017-0040-3 – volume: 10 start-page: 575 issue: 8 year: 2012 ident: 2382_CR1 publication-title: Nat Rev Microbiol doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2819 – volume: 105 start-page: 1907 issue: 24 year: 2013 ident: 2382_CR34 publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt300 – volume: 23 start-page: 4422 year: 2017 ident: 2382_CR33 publication-title: Med Sci Monit doi: 10.12659/MSM.904220 – volume: 132 start-page: 1012 issue: 5 year: 2002 ident: 2382_CR32 publication-title: J Nutr doi: 10.1093/jn/132.5.1012 – volume: 11 start-page: 264 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 2382_CR10 publication-title: Gastroenterol Res doi: 10.14740/gr1062w – volume: 99 start-page: 135 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 2382_CR11 publication-title: Oncology doi: 10.1159/000510944 – volume: 139 start-page: 1318 issue: 6 year: 2016 ident: 2382_CR38 publication-title: Int J Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.30168 – volume: 14 issue: 6 year: 2019 ident: 2382_CR20 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218436 – volume: 13 start-page: 691 issue: 12 year: 2016 ident: 2382_CR2 publication-title: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.165 – volume: 61 start-page: 847 issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: 2382_CR9 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300865 |
SSID | ssj0017823 |
Score | 2.3731265 |
Snippet | Background Gut pathological microbial imbalance or dysbiosis is closely associated with colorectal cancer. Although there are observable differences in... Gut pathological microbial imbalance or dysbiosis is closely associated with colorectal cancer. Although there are observable differences in molecular and... Abstract Background Gut pathological microbial imbalance or dysbiosis is closely associated with colorectal cancer. Although there are observable differences... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing Analysis Bacteria Cancer Care and treatment Cholesterol Colectomy Colon cancer Colorectal cancer Colorectal carcinoma Colorectal surgery Diabetes Diagnosis Discriminant analysis Disease Dysbacteriosis Enzymes Feces Gastroenterology Gene amplification Gene polymorphism Genetic aspects Genetic polymorphisms Gut microbiota Health aspects Intestinal microflora Laboratories Lipid metabolism Metabolic disorders Microbiomes Microbiota Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) Mutation Pathogenesis Patient outcomes Patients Phylogenetics Restriction fragment length polymorphism Ribosomal RNA Risk factors rRNA 16S Software T-RFLP Tumors Vitamin B12 |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQD4gL4ikCBRkJiQNYTfyIk-OCqCqk9gBU6s1y_ICVtinazR7CD-rv7IzjXTUgwYXLHuLxJvG84_E3hLzhkBpH4RRrfWmZdC4y23g8sVyDKYxlpzmeHT49q0_O5ecLdXGr1RfWhE3wwNPCHangbQAvXXrVSdV0LWhFhVImfIRcI2Xr4PN2yVTePwC_J3ZHZJr6aANWWGOxLWfoozgbZ24oofX_aZN_r5O85XiOH5D7OWKki-lJH5I7oX9E7p7mPfHH5Bo4Tb9vB3q5nECVBkuxUDxXY9FlTzN46obiV1ea8nFGbe_pKsSBYcNOTxG9Gq0f3MqhJKwTQWohTt12wgdHIvzKfzm-p3YDBHY1_oK53Uir-itdfzlbUBDIQG2qU4eb50pt8I9PyPnxp28fT1juvsAcRHEDWB6B6GacBx5daEWQuik7SAghAipVbKzkvvKQ4HRWlLyFH6XLiLuEUkBO48VTctBf9eEZoVVUHaRZUQcVZcR_KbmzSvgWGyqItiDVjhnGZWhy7JCxMilFaWozMdAAA01ioBkL8m4_5-cEzPFX6g_I4z0lgmqnCyBqJoua-ZeoFeQtSohB1YfHczafYICXRBAts9CpfYDWQHk4owSVdfPhnYyZbDI2htdtJWFlJS_I6_0wzsQyuD5cbZGmqSDkgKi3IHomm7M3m4_0yx8JNhxCefAm6vn_WIoX5B5P2lQzrg7JwbDehpcQnQ3dq6SIN6DONcg priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lj9MwELZgkRAXxFMEFmQkJA5gbWLHcXJCBbFaIe0egJV6sxw_lkrddLdJD-EH8TuZcd1CQNpLD_W4aTTjb2bs8TeEvOGQGgdhJWtcblhpbWCmdnhjuQIoDHmrON4dPj2rTs7LL3M5TxtufSqr3GFiBGq3srhHfsSrpijBXZf8w9U1w65ReLqaWmjcJneQugyTLzXfJ1wFeD-xuyhTV0c9YLHCklvO0FNxNk6cUeTs_x-Z_62W_Mv9HD8g91PcSGdbRT8kt3z3iNw9TSfjj8kv0De92Az0crGlVhoMxXLxVJNFFx1NFKo9xb1XGrNyRk3n6NKHgWHbTkeRwxoxEB5l0R7WUSA2Eqd2s2UJRyHc678c31PTg4BZjj9hbjvSovpG11_PZhTM0lMTq9Xh4aleG7zkE3J-_Pn7pxOWejAwC7HcAPgjkOOMc8-D9Y3wparzFtJCiINyGWpTclc4SHNaI3LewIdUecCzwlJAZuPEU3LQrTr_jNAiyBaSraC8DGXAX8m5NVK4BtsqiCYjxU4Z2iaCcuyTsdQxUakrvVWgBgXqqEA9ZuTdfs7Vlp7jRumPqOO9JFJrxy9W6wudVqqW3hkPYWHuZFvKum0AhguENeECJLd5Rt6ihWgEAPh71qR7DPCSSKWlZyo2EVAKJA8nkrBw7XR4Z2M6AUev_5h5Rl7vh3EmFsN1frVBmbqAwANi34yoiW1O3mw60i1-RPJwCOjBp8jnNz_8BbnH4zqpGJeH5GBYb_xLiL6G9lVcYr8B7kEuNg priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | The gut microbiota composition in patients with right- and left-sided colorectal cancer and after curative colectomy, as analyzed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2691450542 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2681036545 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9233765 https://doaj.org/article/5edae0560d5b458b9887178703df1910 |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3dq9MwFA_3A8QX8ROn1xFB8EGjbdo07YPIJvdyETZkOhi-hDQf9w52O906sP5B_p2ek3XT6kXwpQ_NSZsm57M5-R1CnnEIjX1iBCtspFlqjGc6t3hiOQNV6KNScjw7PBpn59P0_UzMDsiu3FE7getrQzusJzVdLV59-9q8BYF_EwQ-z16vQcdKTKXlDC0QZ80hOQbLJLGUwyj9tasA1jAk3MMoGLjes90hmmuf0TFUAc__b639Zyblb6bp7Da51fqUdLBlgjvkwFV3yY1Ru2t-j_wAXqAXm5pezbewS7WmmEre5mvReUVbeNU1xf-yNETsjOrK0oXzNcOSnpYivjXqR3iVQV5ZBYJQZJyazRZBHIlwH-CqeUn1Ggj0ovkOfcuGxtlHupqMBxRY1lEdMtnh5W0uN1jQ-2R6dvrp3Tlr6zMwA35eDbopQfwzzh33xhWJS2UelRAygo8UCZ_rlNvYQghU6iTiBVyEjDzuI6YJRD02eUCOqmXlHhIae1FCIOalEz71-JSIGy0SW2DJhaTokXi3GMq04OVYQ2OhQhCTZ2q7gAoWUIUFVE2PvNj3-bKF7vgn9RDXeE-JsNvhxnJ1oVopVsJZ7cBljKwoU5GXBajoGFVeYj0EvlGPPEcOUciuMDyj2zMO8JEIs6UGMhQYkBIoTzqUINSm27zjMbWTCcWzIk5hZlPeI0_3zdgTE-Uqt9wgTR6DUwJ-cY_IDm92vqzbUs0vA7A4OPtgb8Sj_5q4x-QmD2KTMS5OyFG92rgn4KjVZZ8cypnsk-Ph6fjDpB9-d_SDRMJ1Mvz8EzsVPDk |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbKVgIuiKcIFDASiANETZw4jwNCW2i1pd0VKq3Um3H8KCtts2U3KxR-EEd-IzNOshCQeutlD-txnGhmvpmxxzOEvGAQGttIcT_XgfRjpawvM403lhOAQhsUKcO7w-NJMjqJP57y0w3yq7sLg2mVHSY6oNZzhXvk2yzJwxjMdczeXXzzsWsUnq52LTQasTgw9XcI2ZZv9z8Af18ytrd7_H7kt10FfAXeSQUaFWHVLsYMs8rkkYnTLCgg0AHLHnCbyZjpUIPjXsgoYDn88DSwePoVR-Cr6wiee41sxhG4CgOyubM7-XS0PrcAext1V3OyZHsJ6J9iki_z0TYyv-6ZP9cl4H9b8G9-5l8Gb-82udV6qnTYiNYdsmHKu-T6uD2Lv0d-goTRs1VFz6dNMadKUkxQb7PA6LSkbdHWJcXdXur2AXwqS01nxlY-NgrVFKtmI-rCUgolcOEIXOtyqlZNXXIkwtOF8_oNlUsgkLP6B8wtahomn-niaDKkoAiGSpcfD4u3GeJgl--TkyvhzwMyKOeleUhoaHkB4Z1NDbexxacETEke6RwbOUS5R8KOGUK1JdGxM8dMuNAoS0TDQAEMFI6BovbI6_Wci6YgyKXUO8jjNSUW83Z_zBdnosUGwY2WBhzRQPMi5lmRA_CHCKSRthBOBx55hRIiEHLg9ZRsb07AR2LxLjFMXduCNAXKrR4lQIXqD3cyJlqoWoo_iuWR5-thnInpd6WZr5AmC8HVAW_bI2lPNntf1h8pp19duXIIIcCK8UeXL_6M3Bgdjw_F4f7k4DG5yZzOJD7jW2RQLVbmCfh-VfG0VThKvly1jv8Gm7ZoyQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+gut+microbiota+composition+in+patients+with+right-+and+left-sided+colorectal+cancer+and+after+curative+colectomy%2C+as+analyzed+by+16S+rRNA+gene+amplicon+sequencing&rft.jtitle=BMC+gastroenterology&rft.au=Suga%2C+Daisuke&rft.au=Mizutani%2C+Hiroki&rft.au=Fukui%2C+Shunsuke&rft.au=Kobayashi%2C+Mayu&rft.date=2022-06-25&rft.issn=1471-230X&rft.eissn=1471-230X&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12876-022-02382-y&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s12876_022_02382_y |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-230X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-230X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-230X&client=summon |